Marketing Decision Support System
Marketing Decision Support System
1. DSS tends to be aimed at the less well structured, underspecified problem that upper
level managers typically face;
2. DSS attempts to combine the use of models or analytic techniques with traditional data
access and retrieval functions;
3. DSS specifically focuses on features which make them easy to use by non-computer-
proficient people in an interactive mode; and
4. DSS emphasizes flexibility and adaptability to accommodate changes in
the environment and the decision making approach of the user.
DSSs include knowledge-based systems. A properly designed DSS is an interactive software-
based system intended to help decision makers compile useful information from a combination
of raw data, documents, and personal knowledge, or business models to identify and solve
problems and make decisions.
Typical information that a decision support application might gather and present includes:
inventories of information assets (including legacy and relational data sources, cubes, data
warehouses, and data marts),
comparative sales figures between one period and the next,
projected revenue figures based on product sales assumptions.
Example
A MKDSS is used to support the software vendors’ planning strategy for marketing
products. It can help to identify advantageous levels of pricing, advertising spending, and
advertising copy for the firm’s products.[5] This helps determine the firm's marketing
mix for product software.
History:
The concept of decision support has evolved mainly from the theoretical studies of
organizational decision making done at the Carnegie Institute of Technology during the late
1950s and early 1960s, and the implementation work done in the 1960s. DSS became an area
of research of its own in the middle of the 1970s, before gaining in intensity during the
1980s. In the middle and late 1980s, executive information systems (EIS), group decision
support systems (GDSS), and organizational decision support systems (ODSS) evolved from
the single user and model-oriented DSS.
According to Sol (1987) the definition and scope of DSS has been migrating over the
years: in the 1970s DSS was described as "a computer-based system to aid decision
making"; in the late 1970s the DSS movement started focusing on "interactive computer-
based systems which help decision-makers utilize data bases and models to solve ill-
structured problems"; in the 1980s DSS should provide systems "using suitable and
available technology to improve effectiveness of managerial and professional activities",
and towards the end of 1980s DSS faced a new challenge towards the design of
intelligent workstations.[4]
In 1987, Texas Instruments completed development of the Gate Assignment Display
System (GADS) for United Airlines. This decision support system is credited with
significantly reducing travel delays by aiding the management of ground operations at
various airports, beginning with O'Hare International Airport in Chicago and Stapleton
Airport in DenverColorado.[5] Beginning in about 1990, data warehousing and on-line
analytical processing (OLAP) began broadening the realm of DSS. As the turn of the
millennium approached, new Web-based analytical applications were introduced.
The advent of more and better reporting technologies has seen DSS start to emerge as a
critical component of management design. Examples of this can be seen in the intense
amount of discussion of DSS in the education environment.
DSS also have a weak connection to the user interface paradigm of hypertext. Both
the University of Vermont PROMIS system (for medical decision making) and the
Carnegie Mellon ZOG/KMS system (for military and business decision making) were
decision support systems which also were major breakthroughs in user interface research.
Furthermore, although hypertext researchers have generally been concerned
with information overload, certain researchers, notably Douglas Engelbart, have been
focused on decision makers in particular.
Taxonomies:
Using the relationship with the user as the criterion,
Haettenschwiler differentiates passive, active, and cooperative DSS. A passive DSS is a system
that aids the process of decision making, but that cannot bring out explicit decision suggestions
or solutions. An active DSS can bring out such decision suggestions or solutions. A cooperative
DSS allows for an iterative process between human and system towards the achievement of a
consolidated solution: the decision maker (or its advisor) can modify, complete, or refine the
decision suggestions provided by the system, before sending them back to the system for
validation, and likewise the system again improves, completes, and refines the suggestions of the
decision maker and sends them back to them for validation.
Another taxonomy for DSS, according to the mode of assistance, has been created by Daniel
Power: he differentiates communication-driven DSS, data-driven DSS, document-driven
DSS, knowledge-driven DSS, and model-driven DSS.
1. The actual application that will be used by the user. This is the part of the application that
allows the decision maker to make decisions in a particular problem area. The user can
act upon that particular problem.
2. Generator contains Hardware/software environment that allows people to easily develop
specific DSS applications. This level makes use of case tools or systems such as
Crystal, Analytica and iThink.
3. Tools include lower level hardware/software. DSS generators including special
languages, function libraries and linking modules
An iterative developmental approach allows for the DSS to be changed and redesigned at various
intervals. Once the system is designed, it will need to be tested and revised where necessary for
the desired outcome.
Classification:
There are several ways to classify DSS applications. Not every DSS fits neatly into one of the
categories, but may be a mix of two or more architectures.
Holsapple and Whinston classify DSS into the following six frameworks: text-oriented DSS,
database-oriented DSS, spreadsheet-oriented DSS, solver-oriented DSS, rule-oriented DSS, and
compound DSS. A compound DSS is the most popular classification for a DSS; it is a hybrid
system that includes two or more of the five basic structures.[14]
The support given by DSS can be separated into three distinct, interrelated categories: Personal
Support, Group Support, and Organizational Support.
DSS components may be classified as: