Most Notable Artist in History
Most Notable Artist in History
Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Soup Cans are perhaps the most well-known images of American modern
art. Initially created as a series of thirty two canvases in 1962, the soup cans gained international
acclaim as a breakthrough in Pop Art. Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Soup Cans are perhaps the most
well-known images of American modern art. Initially created as a series of thirty two canvases in
1962, the soup cans gained international acclaim as a breakthrough in Pop Art.
Warhol’s inspiration for the series developed from his personal life. He explains “I used to drink it. I
used to have the same lunch every day, for 20 years, I guess, the same thing over and over again.”
This sense of repetition was definitely both internalized by the artist and embodied by commercial
mass culture. Initially, the debut of the Campbell’s Soup Cans was widely contested as many viewers
struggled to grapple with such flagrant appropriation of a commonplace object. However, Warhol
would take the themes of repetition and mass production further by creating two portfolios of
Campbell’s Soup Can screen prints in 1968.
Vincent Van Gogh: Starry Night
Starry Night is one of the most recognized pieces of art in the world. It is absolutely everywhere, too.
It can be seen on coffee, mugs, t-shirts, towels, magnets, etc. Honestly, it sometimes feels as if the
painting’s fame has exceeded that of its creator. It is a magnificent piece of art. That Starry Night
resonates with so many people is a testament to how its beauty is timeless and universal.
Salvador Dali- The Persistence of Memory (1931) by Spanish artist and Surrealist icon Salvador
Dalí is one of the rare works of art that can be conjured with the mention of two simple words:
melting clocks.Like Van Gogh’s Starry Night (1889) and Picasso’s Les Demoiselles
D’Avignon (1907), The Persistence of Memory attracts visitors from all over the world to
the Museum of Modern Art as a work that has come to represent an entire movement. The
Surrealist vision brings an uncanny landscape to life with unnerving accuracy—when you imagine
how a clock would melt, this is how it would melt. It would droop, distort, and elongate. “My
whole ambition in the pictorial domain is to materialize the images of my concrete irrationality
with the most imperialist fury of precision,” Dalí wrote in his book Conquest of the Irrational.
Da Vinci’s artistic prowess is manifested in Mona Lisa and the Last Supper paintings. The two
paintings put Da Vinci on the world map and until now he is regarded as the best painter of all
time. Historical sources reveal that Da Vinci did not work on the two paintings during the same
time. Da Vinci painted the Last Supper painting before he started working on the Mona Lisa
painting. The events in the renaissance period influenced the majority of Da Vinci’s paintings
including Mona Lisa and the Last Supper. This paper will compare and contrast Mona Lisa and
the Last Supper paintings done by Leonardo Da Vinci.
The Last Supper painting was specifically done for Da Vinci’s master known as Duke
Ludovico. The Last Supper is a sacred painting that represents the last meeting that Jesus
held with his disciples a few moments before his death.
The painting shows Jesus taking the last supper with his disciples as he disclosed to them
who among his disciples would betray him. The painting is influenced by the chronology of
Jesus that is recorded in the book of John chapter 13.
On the other hand, Mona Lisa is a secular painting that depicts an Italian woman with a
very attractive smile seated on an arm chair. The woman has an enigmatic expression on
her face. The identity of the woman in the painting is not exactly known but sources
suggest that the woman in the Mona Lisa painting is Lisa Del Giocondo who was the wife of
a rich Italian merchant.
Pablo Picasso- Displayed near the entrance of the Republican’s pavilion, Guernica was the first
thing many visitors saw. The complex composition, with Picasso’s characteristic Cubist figures
and disquieting representation of space, was not easy to read. A braying horse occupies the
painting’s centre, stumbling over its fallen rider sprawled below and lit by the spiked rays of
a light bulb above. A bellowing bull on the left seems to encompass a wailing mother with her
child laying slack in her arms. A ghostly figure emerges from an opening to the right, holding a
gaslight, while a woman closer to the foreground hangs her arms in despair. Farther back, flames
and possibly ruins consume a howling figure. The dramatic subject is subdued, painted in
the grisaille technique, a method using a neutral monochrome palette. Picasso said very little
about the painting’s meaning, leaving interpretation to viewers, critics, and art historians.
Although clear as an emotional response to war’s senseless violence, the painting, with its
mismatched subjects, confounded world’s fair viewers.
Another is the Weeping Woman is based on an image of a woman holding her dead child. It
is taken from Picasso’s anti-war mural, Guernica. Picasso painted both works during the
Spanish Civil War (1936-39). It was in response to the bombing of the Basque town of
Guernica. The attack was carried out in April 1937 by Nazi Germany’s air force, in support of
Spain's Nationalist forces. Hundreds of people were killed. The figure of the Weeping
Woman is based on artist and photographer Dora Maar. Maar photographed Picasso's
making of Guernica.
Painted by Judy Chicago- an important icon of 1970s feminist art and a milestone in twentieth-century
art, is presented as the centerpiece around which the Elizabeth A. Sackler Center for Feminist Art is
organized. The Dinner Party comprises a massive ceremonial banquet, arranged on a triangular table
with a total of thirty-nine place settings, each commemorating an important woman from history. The
settings consist of embroidered runners, gold chalices and utensils, and china-painted porcelain plates
with raised central motifs that are based on vulvar and butterfly forms and rendered in styles
appropriate to the individual women being honored. The names of another 999 women are inscribed
in gold on the white tile floor below the triangular table. This permanent installation is enhanced by
rotating Herstory Gallery exhibitions relating to the 1,038 women honored at the table.
Johannes Vermeer-Girl with a Pearl Earring, oil painting on canvas (c. 1665) by Dutch
artist Johannes Vermeer, one of his most well-known works. It depicts an imaginary young
woman in exotic dress and a very large pearl earring. The work permanently resides in
the Mauritshuis museum in The Hague.
An observant and deliberate painter, Vermeer produced only 36 known works in his
lifetime, while many of his contemporaries completed hundreds.
Girl with a Pearl Earring represents a young woman in a dark shallow space,
an intimate setting that draws the viewer’s attention exclusively on her. She wears a blue
and gold turban, the titular pearl earring, and a gold jacket with a visible white collar
beneath.
Unlike many of Vermeer’s subjects, she is not concentrating on a daily chore and unaware
of her viewer. Instead, caught in a fleeting moment, she turns her head over her shoulder,
meeting the viewer’s gaze with her eyes wide and lips parted as if about to speak.
Her enigmatic expression coupled with the mystery of her identity has led some to compare
her to the equivocal subject in Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa (c. 1503–19). Unlike the Mona
Lisa, however, Girl with a Pearl Earring is not a portrait but a tronie, a Dutch term for a
character or type of person. A young woman might have sat for Vermeer, but the painting
is not meant to portray her or any specific individual in the same way that Leonardo’s piece
portrayed an existing person (likely Lisa Gherardini, the wife of a Florentine merchant).
Edvard Munch's The Scream is an icon of modern art, the Mona Lisa for our time. As Leonardo da
Vinci evoked a Renaissance ideal of serenity and self-control, Munch defined how we see our
own age - wracked with anxiety and uncertainty.
Essentially The Scream is autobiographical, an expressionistic construction based on
Munch's actual experience of a scream piercing through nature while on a walk, after his
two companions, seen in the background, had left him. Fitting the fact that the sound must
have been heard at a time when his mind was in an abnormal state, Munch renders it in a
style which if pushed to extremes can destroy human integrity. As previously noted, the
flowing curves of art nouveau represent a subjective linear fusion imposed upon nature,
whereby the multiplicity of particulars is unified into a totality of organic suggestion with
feminine overtones. But man is part of nature, and absorption into such a totality liquidates
the individual. Beginning at this time Munch included art nouveau elements in many
pictures but usually only in a limited or modified way. Here, however, in depicting his own
morbid experience, he has let go, and allowed the foreground figure to become distorted
by the subjectivized flow of nature; the scream could be interpreted as expressing the
agony of the obliteration of human personality by this unifying force. Significantly, although
it was Munch himself who underwent the experience depicted, the protagonist bears no
resemblance to him or anyone else. The creature in the foreground has been
depersonalized and crushed into sexlessness or, if anything, stamped with a trace of the
femininity of the world that has come close to assimilating it.
Sandro Boticelli- Known as the “Birth of Venus”, the composition actually shows the goddess of
love and beauty arriving on land, on the island of Cyprus, born of the sea spray and blown there
by the winds, Zephyr and, perhaps, Aura. The goddess is standing on a giant scallop shell, as pure
and as perfect as a pearl. She is met by a young woman, who is sometimes identified as one of
the Graces or as the Hora of spring, and who holds out a cloak covered in flowers. Even the
roses, blown in by the wind are a reminder of spring. The subject of the painting, which
celebrates
Venus as symbol of love and beauty, was perhaps suggested by the poet Agnolo Poliziano.
is widely used throughout the 15th century for decorative works destined to noble houses.
Botticelli takes his inspiration from classical statues for Venus’ modest pose, as she covers
her nakedness with long, blond hair, which has reflections of light from the fact that it has
been gilded; even the Winds, the pair flying in one another’s embrace, is based on an
ancient work, a gem from the Hellenistic period, owned by Lorenzo the Magnificent.
About Nighthawks Edward Hopper recollected, “unconsciously, probably, I was painting the
loneliness of a large city.” In an all-night diner, three customers sit at the counter opposite a
server, each appear to be lost in thought and disengaged from one another. The composition is
tightly organized and spare in details: there is no entrance to the establishment, no debris on the
streets. Through harmonious geometric forms and the glow of the diner’s electric lighting,
Hopper created a serene, beautiful, yet enigmatic scene. Although inspired by a restaurant
Hopper had seen on Greenwich Avenue in New York, the painting is not a realistic transcription
of an actual place. As viewers, we are left to wonder about the figures, their relationships, and
this imagined world.