Online Group Presentation10
Online Group Presentation10
Value: 15%
Online Group Presentation: Artificial Moral Agent
Value: 15%
Group Presentation. Individual presentation will not be accepted.
The Group Presentation, due Week 13, is about designing an AI as an ethical agent. Each group will recommend a set of rules to train an AI as
an ethical agent. Each group will recommend its rules and will explain why they think their recommended rules can make an AI an ethical
agent.
1. First, join a group. Each group has 5 members. Groups were assigned randomly by eCentennial. Once you are in a group, you have
access to the email addresses of other members. After joining a group, start working on your presentation. This is a virtual
presentation, and you don’t need to meet your teammates physically. You can work on your presentation by communicating through
emails (Centennial Email). Group lockers on eCentennial are available too. Check your own online group.
2. Once your group is formed, choose an artificial intelligence such as a self-driving car or a humanoid robot e.g., Sophia the Robot or
etc.
3. You will be required to put together a 10-15-minute presentation in which you will recommend a set of rules (e.g., Three Laws of
Asimov) to train an AI as an ethical agent. Note: You do not copy the Three Laws of Asimov. They are just some examples of the
laws that you need to create as your own suggestion. It gives you an idea about the laws you are going to suggest as your own. In your
presentation, you need to discuss the applicability of your laws by means of discussing ethical problems (dilemmas). You need to
mention at least one ethical scenario (dilemma) and try to solve it based on your own suggestion.
6. You will be marked as a group. No individual presentation will be accepted. If you have a communication problem with your group
members, you need to inform the professor by the end of Week 12.
Rubric:
0 1 2 3 4 Marks
Recommending No Some rules A set of rules A set of rules A set of inclusive
a set of rules to Recommendation presented as their presented as their satisfactorily rules as their
train an AI recommendation. recommendation presented as their recommendation
No explanation and explained, but recommendation clearly presented
/4
offered. not satisfactorily. and explained and well explained.
The set is not The set is not satisfactorily, but
inclusive. inclusive. the set is not
inclusive.
The No attempt Explaining (not Explaining Explaining Explaining (in an /4
applicability of satisfactorily) why satisfactorily why satisfactorily why excellent way) why
the the recommended the recommended the recommended the recommended
recommended rules are applicable. rules are applicable. rules are applicable rules are applicable
rules No example No example by way of an by way of an
mentioned. mentioned. example of solving example of solving
a moral dilemma a moral dilemma
based on using the based on using the
recommended rules recommended rules
Delivery Delivery is unclear Delivery is Delivery and logical Delivery and logical Delivery and logical
and impossible to somewhat clear but structure of ideas structure of ideas structure of ideas
/4
follow overall poorly are satisfactory are good are very good
logically structured
Total / 12