Bcog 171
Bcog 171
ANSWER(1)
A Production Possibility Curve (PPC), also known as a Production Possibility Frontier (PPF), is a graphical
representation used in economics to demonstrate the trade-offs a society or business faces when allocating its
resources between the production of two different goods or services. The PPC illustrates the maximum combination
of two goods that can be produced with the available resources and technology, assuming that all resources are fully
employed and efficiently allocated. Here's a breakdown of the concept, its assumptions, and an example:
Limited Resources: The central idea behind the PPC is the scarcity of resources. In the real world, resources such as
labour , capital, and raw materials are limited, and therefore, choices must be made about what to produce.
Opportunity Cost: The PPC reflects the concept of opportunity cost. Opportunity cost refers to the value of the next
best alternative foregone when a choice is made. As a society or business decides to produce more of one good, it
must sacrifice the production of the other good.
Efficiency: The PPC assumes that resources are used efficiently, meaning there is no waste, and all resources are fully
employed. Any point within or on the curve represents an efficient allocation of resources, while points outside the
curve indicate inefficiency.
Fixed Technology: The PPC assumes that the level of technology remains constant. Changes in technology can shift
the curve outward (indicating increased production possibilities) or inward (indicating decreased production
possibilities).
Two Goods: The PPC focuses on the trade-off between two goods or services. This simplification is necessary to
create a graphical representation, but in reality, economies produce a wide variety of goods and services.
Let's illustrate the concept of a PPC with an example involving the production of two goods: "Cars" and "Bicycles."
We'll assume that there are limited resources (labour , capital, and materials) and that the technology remains
constant.
Suppose a country has 100 units of labour and 100 units of capital. It can allocate these resources to produce cars
and bicycles. The following table shows different production combinations:
Cars (per month) Bicycles (per month)
0 500
20 400
40 300
60 200
80 100
100 0
The curve starts at point A, where all resources are allocated to produce bicycles (500 bicycles and 0 cars).
As we move to point B, the country decides to allocate more resources to produce cars and fewer to produce
bicycles. This results in a reduction in bicycle production but an increase in car production.
Point C represents a balanced allocation of resources.
Point D shows a scenario where the country is producing mainly cars and very few bicycles.
Finally, point E represents a situation where all resources are allocated to produce cars, resulting in zero bicycle
production.
The curve connecting these points illustrates the trade-off between cars and bicycles that the country faces. It shows
that to produce more of one good, it must produce less of the other, given the limited resources and constant
technology.
The shape of the curve can change if there are changes in technology or resource availability. A shift outward would
indicate economic growth, while a shift inward could represent a recession or resource depletion.
ANSWER(2)
Positive economics and normative economics are two distinct approaches within the field of economics, and they
serve different purposes. Let's distinguish between the two and discuss their respective roles and preferences:
Positive Economics:
Objective Analysis: Positive economics is concerned with describing and explaining economic phenomena as they
are, without introducing value judgments or opinions. It focuses on empirical data and the scientific method to
analyze economic events, behaviors, and outcomes.
Fact-Based: Positive economics seeks to answer questions about what is happening in the economy, how people
make economic decisions, and the consequences of these decisions. It relies on empirical evidence, data, and
statistical analysis.
Descriptive: It provides an understanding of how the economy works based on observable facts, data, and historical
trends. Positive economic statements can be tested and verified.
Normative Economics:
Value-Based: Normative economics is concerned with making judgments and recommendations about what should
be done in the economy. It involves subjective opinions, values, and ethical considerations. Normative statements
express what ought to happen or what is morally or ethically desirable.
Prescriptive: Normative economics deals with policy recommendations, suggesting how resources should be
allocated, what goals the economy should pursue, and what policies are best for society.
"The government should increase spending on education to improve the long-term prospects of the workforce."
"Tax policy should be designed to reduce income inequality."
Preference and Importance:
The preference for either positive or normative economics depends on the context and the specific goals of the
analysis:
Positive Economics:
Positive economics is generally preferred when the aim is to provide an objective, unbiased, and empirical analysis of
economic issues. It is especially important for building a solid understanding of how economic systems operate.
Positive economics forms the foundation upon which normative economic analysis can be built. Policy
recommendations should ideally be grounded in a thorough understanding of the underlying facts.
Normative Economics:
Normative economics is essential for guiding policy decisions and addressing questions of fairness, justice, and ethics.
It plays a crucial role in addressing societal goals and values.
While normative statements involve subjective judgments, they are essential for influencing policy, as economic
decisions often have profound social and ethical implications.
In summary, both positive and normative economics have their place in economic analysis. Positive economics
provides the factual basis upon which normative economics can be constructed. While positive economics is
concerned with "what is," normative economics addresses "what should be" based on individual and societal values
and goals. The preference between the two depends on the specific context and the goals of the analysis.
ANSWER(3)
The Law of Variable Proportions, also known as the Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns, is an important concept in
economics that describes the relationship between the inputs of production and the outputs or products. It states
that as a firm increases the quantity of one input while keeping other inputs constant, there will come a point at
which the additional output produced from each additional unit of the variable input (labour , for example) will
decrease.
This law can be explained using the concepts of Total Product (TP), Average Product (AP), and Marginal Product (MP):
Total Product (TP): Total Product refers to the total output or quantity of goods produced by a firm or a production
process. It's the sum of all the units of output produced from a given combination of inputs.
Average Product (AP): Average Product is the per-unit output, calculated by dividing the total product (TP) by the
quantity of the variable input (typically labour ). Mathematically, it is expressed as: AP = TP / Quantity of the Variable
Input (e.g., labour ).
Marginal Product (MP): Marginal Product represents the additional output or product that results from increasing the
quantity of the variable input by one unit while keeping all other inputs constant. Mathematically, it is expressed as:
MP = Change in Total Product (ΔTP) / Change in Quantity of the Variable Input (ΔQ).
Now, let's illustrate the Law of Variable Proportions using these concepts:
Stages of Production under the Law of Variable Proportions:
Increasing Returns (Stage I): In the initial stages of production, as more units of the variable input are added, the
Total Product (TP) increases at an increasing rate. This is because the additional input is making more efficient use of
the fixed inputs. The Average Product (AP) also rises during this stage because TP is increasing at a faster rate than
the quantity of the variable input. MP is positive and increasing, indicating that each additional unit of the variable
input contributes more than the previous unit.
Diminishing Returns (Stage II): At some point, the Law of Variable Proportions comes into effect. In this stage, as
more units of the variable input are added, the TP continues to increase, but at a diminishing rate. The AP starts to
decline, although it remains positive. MP, in this stage, is positive but decreasing, indicating that each additional unit
of the variable input contributes less to the total output than the previous unit.
Negative Returns (Stage III): In this stage, if the firm continues to increase the quantity of the variable input, TP
begins to decrease. The AP is negative, indicating that the output per unit of the variable input is now less than one.
MP is also negative, showing that each additional unit of the variable input reduces the total output. This stage
represents inefficiency and is generally avoided in production.
The Law of Variable Proportions highlights the idea that there is an optimal level of input combination for maximizing
production efficiency, and beyond that point, the marginal returns diminish. It's a crucial concept for firms and
producers to consider when making decisions about input levels and resource allocation in the production process.
ANSWER(4)
The "backward bending supply curve" is a concept from economics that describes a situation in which the supply of
labour decreases as wages increase beyond a certain point. This phenomenon is often used to illustrate the labour -
leisure trade-off that individuals face when making decisions about how much time to allocate to work and how
much time to allocate to leisure activities. The backward bending supply curve is typically associated with the labour
market.
Here's a more detailed explanation with an example:
This concept is based on the assumption that individuals have a finite amount of time, and they value leisure as well
as income. As wages rise, individuals may choose to work longer hours to earn more money up to a certain point.
However, beyond this point, as wages increase further, individuals may prefer to work fewer hours and use the
additional income to enjoy more leisure activities.
Example of a Backward Bending Supply Curve:
Let's consider a hypothetical example involving a worker, John, who has a choice between working and leisure. John's
decision depends on his wage rate and his preference for leisure. For the sake of illustration, let's assume the
following:
John works 40 hours a week at a wage of $10 per hour, earning $400 per week.
If the wage increases to $15 per hour, John may choose to work more, say 50 hours a week, earning $750 per week.
However, when the wage further increases to $25 per hour, John may decide to work fewer hours, perhaps 45 hours
a week, earning $1,125 per week.
In this example, the backward bending supply curve suggests that John is willing to work more hours when his wage
increases from $10 to $15 per hour. Still, as his wage rises further to $25 per hour, he starts to reduce his labour
supply because he values the additional leisure more than the additional income beyond a certain point.
This behaviour may occur for various reasons, including a desire for more free time, diminishing marginal utility of
income, or the existence of alternative ways to spend time that are more satisfying than working longer hours.
It's important to note that the concept of the backward bending supply curve is more relevant to individual labour
supply decisions and may not apply to all workers or labour markets. Different individuals have varying preferences
and income needs, which can lead to different shapes of labour supply curves in the real world.
ANSWER(5)
In a perfectly competitive industry, the short-run equilibrium refers to a situation where the industry is in a state of
balance, where the supply and demand for the product are equal, and firms within the industry are earning zero
economic profit. Here's an explanation of an industry's short-run equilibrium in perfect competition:
Firm's Output Decision: In the short run, firms aim to maximize profit. To do this, they compare the market price with
their marginal cost (MC) of production. A profit-maximizing firm will produce the quantity of output where MR
(Marginal Revenue) equals MC. Since the demand curve is horizontal, MR is equal to the market price.
Profit or Loss: If the market price (P) is greater than the average total cost (ATC) at the profit-maximizing level of
output, the firm earns a positive economic profit. If P is less than ATC, the firm incurs a loss. If P equals ATC, the firm
breaks even (earns zero economic profit).
Shut Down Decision: If a firm incurs a loss but the price is greater than its variable cost, the firm may continue to
produce in the short run, covering its variable costs. If the price falls below the variable cost, it may choose to shut
down and produce nothing. The firm will still incur its fixed costs in the short run.
Industry Equilibrium: The industry's short-run equilibrium is achieved when the total quantity supplied by all firms
equals the total quantity demanded in the market at the prevailing market price. This equilibrium price and quantity
are determined by the interaction of all the individual firms operating in the industry.
Zero Economic Profit: In perfect competition, firms tend to earn zero economic profit in the long run. If firms were
earning above-normal profits in the short run, new firms would enter the market, increasing supply, and driving
down prices. Conversely, if firms were incurring losses, some firms might exit the market, reducing supply and
pushing prices up.
In summary, the short-run equilibrium in a perfectly competitive industry is characterized by firms producing at the
quantity where MR equals MC, and the industry achieving a market equilibrium where supply equals demand at a
price that allows firms to earn zero economic profit. This equilibrium can change in the long run as new firms enter or
existing firms exit the industry in response to profit conditions.
SECTION-B
ANSWER(6)
A unitary elastic demand curve, also known as unitary elasticity, represents a specific type of demand curve in
economics where the elasticity of demand is equal to 1. Elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of the
quantity demanded of a good to changes in its price. When the elasticity of demand is exactly equal to 1, it is referred
to as unitary elastic.
Mathematically, the formula for calculating the price elasticity of demand (PED) is:
PED = (% Change in Quantity Demanded) / (% Change in Price)
In the case of unitary elastic demand, PED equals 1. This means that a 1% increase in price will lead to a 1% decrease
in quantity demanded, resulting in no change in total expenditure or revenue.
Graphical Representation:
A unitary elastic demand curve is depicted on a graph as a straight line passing through the origin (0,0). The slope of
this line is exactly -1. It indicates that the percentage change in quantity demanded is equal in magnitude but
opposite in direction to the percentage change in price.
Interpretation:
If the price of a unitary elastic good increases by 10%, the quantity demanded will decrease by 10%. Total revenue
(price multiplied by quantity) remains constant.
If the price decreases by 10%, the quantity demanded will increase by 10%, and total revenue remains constant.
Examples:
Gasoline: Gasoline often exhibits unitary elastic demand in the short run. When the price of gasoline rises,
consumers tend to reduce their consumption by a similar percentage, so total spending on gasoline remains relatively
stable.
Unbranded, generic products: Generic products that are perfect substitutes for branded goods may have unitary
elastic demand. As their prices change, consumers tend to respond proportionally with changes in quantity
demanded.
It's important to note that unitary elastic demand is relatively rare in real-world markets. Most goods have elastic
(PED > 1) or inelastic (PED < 1) demand, meaning that a change in price has a proportionally greater or smaller effect
on the quantity demanded, respectively. Unitary elastic demand represents a special case where price and quantity
demanded change by the same percentage, resulting in constant total revenue.
ANSWER(7)
The elasticity of supply for a commodity, or how responsive the quantity supplied is to changes in price, is influenced
by several key determinants. These determinants help us understand the degree to which producers can adjust their
supply in response to price changes. The main determinants of the elasticity of supply for a commodity include:
Production Time Frame: The time available for producers to adjust their supply is a crucial determinant. In the short
run, supply may be relatively inelastic because some factors of production (e.g., capital and facilities) cannot be easily
changed. In the long run, supply tends to be more elastic as more factors can be adjusted.
Resource Availability: The availability and flexibility of inputs or resources required for production play a significant
role. If inputs are readily available, interchangeable, and can be increased or decreased easily, supply tends to be
more elastic. Scarce or specialized inputs can lead to inelastic supply.
Technology and Production Techniques: The specific technology and production methods used in the industry affect
supply elasticity. Advanced, adaptable, and efficient production methods can lead to a more elastic supply. Outdated
or inflexible technology may result in less elastic supply.
Market Structure: The nature of the market in which the commodity is produced and sold has an impact. In perfectly
competitive markets with numerous producers, supply is often more elastic, as firms can enter or exit the market
with ease. In markets with monopolistic or oligopolistic tendencies, supply may be less elastic due to barriers to entry
and exit.
Storage and Inventory Capacity: The ability to store and hold inventory can influence supply elasticity. If producers
can store goods and release them into the market as needed, supply may be more elastic. If storage capacity is
limited, supply may be less elastic.
Government Policies: Government regulations and policies, such as taxes, subsidies, price controls, and trade
restrictions, can have a significant impact on supply elasticity. For example, taxes and regulations may increase
production costs and reduce supply elasticity, while subsidies can lower costs and increase supply elasticity.
Natural Conditions: Natural factors like weather, climate, and natural disasters can affect the supply of certain
commodities. Agricultural products, for example, may have less elastic supply due to their vulnerability to weather-
related risks.
Perishability: Perishable goods often have less elastic supply because producers must sell them quickly to avoid
spoilage or decay. Non-perishable goods may have more elastic supply, as producers can adjust production over time.
Economies of Scale: The presence of economies of scale, where costs per unit decrease as production increases, can
influence supply elasticity. In industries with significant economies of scale, supply may be more elastic as producers
can benefit from producing more.
Excess Capacity: The degree of excess capacity within production facilities can impact supply elasticity. If a producer
operates well below its full production capacity, it may have the ability to increase supply quickly and respond to
price changes more elastically.
Expectations of Future Prices: The expectations of producers regarding future prices can influence supply elasticity. If
producers expect prices to rise in the future, they may be more willing to increase supply now, resulting in a more
elastic supply.
Understanding these determinants is essential for analyzing how supply responds to changes in price and for making
informed economic decisions and policy recommendations. The combination of these factors varies from one
industry to another and shapes the overall elasticity of supply for different commodities.
ANSWER(8)
Government intervention in price determination involves using various tools and policies to influence or control
prices in different markets. The choice of tools and policies depends on the economic context and the government's
objectives. Here are some of the main tools of government intervention and how they are applied when determining
prices:
Price Controls:
Price Ceilings: These are government-imposed maximum prices that can be charged for certain goods or services.
Price ceilings are typically used to protect consumers from excessive price increases. For example, rent control laws
may establish price ceilings on apartment rents in some cities to make housing more affordable.
Price Floors: These are government-imposed minimum prices for specific goods or services. Price floors are often
used to ensure that producers receive a minimum income. For instance, minimum wage laws set a price floor on
labor, ensuring that workers are paid a certain wage.
Trade Policies:
Tariffs: Governments may impose import tariffs, which are taxes on imported goods. This increases the price of
imported products, protecting domestic industries and providing revenue for the government.
Quotas: Quotas limit the quantity of imported goods, increasing their price by restricting supply. These are used to
protect domestic industries or for political reasons.
Monopoly Regulation:
Governments may regulate the prices charged by natural monopolies (industries with high fixed costs and decreasing
average costs) to prevent them from abusing their market power. These regulations aim to ensure that consumers
are charged fair and reasonable prices for essential services like water, electricity, or telecommunications.
Anti-Trust Laws:
Anti-trust laws are used to prevent anti-competitive practices and ensure that market competition is not restricted.
Breaking up monopolies or preventing anti-competitive mergers can help maintain competitive pricing.
ANSWER(9)
Joint profit maximization, in the context of an oligopoly, refers to a scenario in which firms in an industry work
together to maximize the total profits of all the firms involved, rather than engaging in cutthroat competition that
could reduce their collective profitability. Oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of large
firms that dominate an industry. Joint profit maximization typically occurs through collusion or cooperative behavior
among these firms.
Price Fixing: One common form of collusion is price fixing, where firms agree to set a common price for their
products or services. By doing this, they avoid price wars and maintain stable, higher prices, leading to higher profits
for all firms involved.
Output Quotas: Firms can also agree to limit their production or output levels to avoid oversupply in the market. This
helps maintain higher prices and overall profitability.
Market Sharing: In some cases, firms may agree to divide the market among themselves. Each firm serves a specific
segment or geographical area, reducing the risk of intense competition and allowing them to charge higher prices.
Barriers to Entry: Colluding firms may work together to erect barriers to entry, making it difficult for new competitors
to enter the market. This can include actions like controlling essential resources, establishing high capital
requirements, or using legal tactics to protect their market position.
Cartels: In some industries, firms form cartels, which are formal agreements among competitors to regulate
production, pricing, and sales. Cartels are often illegal because they distort market competition and reduce consumer
welfare.
Achieving joint profit maximization under an oligopoly can be challenging and may not always be sustainable. Several
factors can affect the success of such cooperation:
Cheating: The incentive for individual firms to cheat on the agreement is a significant challenge. Firms may find it
tempting to undercut agreed-upon prices or production levels to capture a larger share of the market.
Monitoring and Enforcement: Enforcing collusion agreements and monitoring competitors' actions can be difficult
and costly. This requires trust and reliable mechanisms to ensure compliance.
Legal and Ethical Constraints: Collusion is often illegal and subject to antitrust laws in many countries, which can lead
to severe penalties for firms involved in such activities.
External Shocks: Changes in market conditions, the entry of new competitors, shifts in consumer preferences, or
external economic shocks can disrupt collusion efforts.
Potential Retaliation: If one firm suspects that another is cheating, retaliation may occur, leading to a breakdown of
cooperation and returning to more competitive behaviour.
While joint profit maximization can be profitable for firms in an oligopoly in the short term, it often raises concerns
about its impact on consumers, competition, and economic efficiency. Therefore, it is often subject to government
scrutiny and regulation to prevent or address anticompetitive behaviour in the marketplace
ANSWER(10)
Functional distribution and personal distribution are two important concepts in economics that help analyze the
distribution of income within an economy. They differ in what aspect of income distribution they focus on:
Components: Functional distribution categorizes income into components such as wages, interest, rent, and profit
based on the role each factor plays in the production process. In contrast, personal distribution examines how these
income components are received by individuals or households based on their labor, investments, or other sources.
Analysis: Functional distribution is primarily concerned with how factors of production are compensated for their
contributions to economic activities, whereas personal distribution assesses income disparities among people within
the economy, considering various sources of income and factors affecting individual or household earnings.
In summary, functional distribution looks at how the economic pie is divided among factors of production, while
personal distribution examines how this income is further distributed among individuals or households. Both
concepts are vital for understanding income inequality, economic disparities, and the overall well-being of different
groups in society
SECTION C
ANSWER(11)
The indifference curve approach is a fundamental concept in microeconomics used to analyze consumer preferences
and choices. It is based on a set of assumptions that underpin its utility in explaining consumer behavior. Here are the
key assumptions of the indifference curve approach:
Transitivity: Consumers' preferences are assumed to be transitive, meaning that if a consumer prefers bundle A to
bundle B and bundle B to bundle C, then the consumer also prefers bundle A to bundle C. This assumption ensures
that consumers have consistent preferences.
Completeness: It is assumed that consumers can compare and rank all possible combinations of goods. In other
words, for any two bundles of goods, consumers can either prefer one over the other, find them equally desirable, or
be indifferent between them.
Non-Satiation: Consumers are assumed to always prefer more of a good to less. This implies that more is better, and
there is no level of consumption at which a consumer becomes completely satiated or indifferent to additional units of
a good.
Convexity: Indifference curves are typically assumed to be convex to the origin, meaning that they slope downward
and become flatter as they move to the right. This reflects the diminishing marginal rate of substitution, indicating
that consumers are willing to trade less of one good for more of another as they move along the curve.
Rationality: Consumers are assumed to be rational decision-makers, seeking to maximize their utility (satisfaction)
given their budget constraints and preferences.
Constant Prices: The prices of goods are assumed to be constant, allowing for a focus on changes in consumer
preferences and budget constraints.
No Income Effects: The analysis often assumes that changes in prices do not impact the consumer's income or budget,
keeping the focus on price changes alone (known as the Hicksian approach).
These assumptions provide a foundation for understanding how consumers make choices based on their preferences
for various combinations of goods and their budget constraints. The indifference curve approach is a powerful tool for
illustrating consumer choices and is commonly used in consumer theory to explain demand, consumer surplus, and
related economic concepts.
ANSWER (12)
Money Wage:
Money wage refers to the nominal wage or the wage expressed in terms of the currency or money. It represents the
actual dollar amount or currency unit that a worker receives as compensation for their labor. Money wages are what
people typically think of when discussing wages and income. They are essential for measuring an individual's income
and purchasing power.
Real Wage:
Real wage, on the other hand, takes into account the purchasing power of the money wage. It is the wage adjusted for
changes in the general price level or inflation. Real wage reflects how much an individual's income can buy in terms of
goods and services, considering changes in the price level. In other words, it measures the actual standard of living or
the real value of earnings.
The relationship between money wage and real wage is influenced by inflation. When prices rise (inflation), the real
wage may decrease, even if the money wage remains the same. Conversely, during periods of deflation, the real wage
may increase.
The formula for calculating the real wage is as follows:
Real Wage = Money Wage / Price Index
Understanding the concept of real wage is important because it provides insight into the true purchasing power of
workers' earnings, taking into account changes in the cost of living due to inflation or deflation .
ANSWER (13)
Isoquants are graphical representations of the production function in microeconomics, specifically in the context of
production theory. Isoquants depict various combinations of inputs (typically labor and capital) that can produce the
same level of output. These curves exhibit several key properties:
Downward Sloping: Isoquants slope downward from left to right. This means that as you move to the right along an
isoquant, you are increasing the quantity of one input while holding the level of output constant. This property
reflects the law of diminishing marginal returns, which states that as more units of one input are added while holding
others constant, the additional output produced from each additional unit of the input will decrease.
Convex Shape: Isoquants are generally convex to the origin. This curvature represents the diminishing marginal rate of
technical substitution (MRTS). As you move along an isoquant from left to right, the trade-off between inputs changes.
Initially, it may be easy to substitute one input for another (e.g., labor for capital) without sacrificing much output.
However, as you move to the right along the isoquant, the trade-off becomes less favorable, and more of one input is
required to replace a unit of the other input.
No Gaps or Intersections: Isoquants do not have gaps or intersections with each other. Each isoquant represents a
unique level of output. If isoquants were to cross, it would imply that the same combination of inputs could produce
two different levels of output, violating the basic premise of the production function.
Higher Isoquants Indicate Greater Output: Higher isoquants represent higher levels of output. In other words, if you
move from one isoquant to a higher one, you are achieving greater production. This reflects the principle that more
input combinations lead to higher output levels.
Isoquants Can Be Parallel: In some cases, isoquants may be parallel to each other. This occurs when the production
function exhibits constant returns to scale, meaning that if all inputs are increased by a certain factor, output increases
by the same factor. Parallel isoquants indicate that doubling inputs, for example, will double the level of output.
Understanding these properties of isoquants is essential for analyzing the production process, input combinations,
and the trade-offs between inputs in the context of production theory and firm decision-making.
ANSWER(14)
The Ricardian Theory of Rent, developed by the British economist David Ricardo in the early 19th century, is a
fundamental concept in economics that explains the economic rent earned by landowners. This theory is based on
several key assumptions and principles:
Economic Rent:
Ricardo introduced the concept of economic rent. Economic rent is the payment made to the owner of land for the
use of land that is in excess of the return that could be earned on the marginal (or least productive) land in use. In
other words, it is the surplus earned by landowners due to the superior productivity of their land compared to
marginal land.