Jurnal Multilingual

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No.

2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

THE EFFECT OF EASE OF USE, EFFECTIVENESS AND RISK


LEVEL ON THE USE OF FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY (CASE
STUDY OF E-WALLET ON PEOPLE IN DKI JAKARTA)
Nesy Putria*1, Harya Kuncara Wiralaga2 , Dicky Iranto3
1
Faculty of Economy, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
2
Lecturer, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
3
Lecturer, Faculty of Economy, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
*
Corresponding Author:
Email: nesyputria@gmail.com

Abstract.

This study aims to determine the effect of the level of convenience and level of risk on
Effectiveness of fintech. The research was conducted during October – November 2022.
The research method is quantitative. The sample used in this research is 100
respondents from DKI Jakarta residents who use fintech. Collecting data in this study
using a questionnaire / questionnaire. Data analysis technique used descriptive
statistical analysis and multiple linear regression analysis with the help of IBM SPSS
25.0 program. The results of the study show that there is a positive and significant
influence between the level of ease of Effectiveness on fintech. Meanwhile, the level of
risk has a negative effect on Effectiveness of fintech.

Keywords: Fintech, Effectiveness, Ease of use Level and Risk Level

1. INTRODUCTION
Technological developments are currently growing very rapidly, there are many innovations
that can make it easier for people in their daily lives. With the existence of technology, resource
utilization becomes easier and more efficient. Until now the use of technology is increasingly
widespread. One of the technologies that people are interested in is the internet. People who used to
use cash payment instruments (case based) are now starting to recognize and use non-cash payments
(non-cash) in carrying out various payment transaction activities (Marchelina & Pratiwi, 2018). One
of the non-cash payment instruments currently being developed in Indonesia is Financial Technology
(Fintech).
The definition of Financial Technology (Fintech) according to the Financial Services Authority
(OJK) is an innovation in the financial services industry that utilizes the use of technology. Fintech
products are usually in the form of a system built to carry out a specific financial transaction
mechanism. Financial technology providers, which include payment systems, market support,
investment management and risk management, loans, financing and capital providers, and other
financial services. Based on data from Bank Indonesia, up to now there are 60 fintech companies that
have officially obtained permits. Based on the DailySocial survey, there are 10 E-Wallets that are
frequently used.

169
Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No. 2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

Grafik 1. Produk Fintech Yang Paling Banyak Digunakan

Produk Fintech yang Paling Banyak Digunakan

Uangku
Doku
Sakuku
i.saku
Paytren
LinkAja
Dana
ShopeePay
GoPay
Ovo
Persen (%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Sumber : dailysocial.id 2022
Ease of use is an individual's opinion that using technology will not expend more effort or in
other words that using technology can make his work easier (Aulia et al., 2021). The existence of
technology should be able to make it easier for individuals, from what was initially difficult to be
easy in carrying out various activities. That way more and more individuals are interested in using
technology. The ease of use of a technology will reflect a person's interest in using that technology.
This shows that the more convenience that can be felt from the use of technology or systems, it can
affect the user's interest.
Even though in fintech itself there are guidelines or procedures for use, there are still people
who have not used fintech. Moreover, most people who access the internet only play social media,
chat online, and play online games. Actually, we only need to get used to being updated with new
technologies. If you are used to it, it will be easy to use fintech. From the results of Tri Inda Fadhila
Rahma's research regarding the perceptions of the people of Medan City towards the use of financial
technology (fintech), it was also stated that the public's interest in using fintech had been proven from
the results of interviews, 9 out of 10 respondents were interested in using it (Rahma, 2018). People
already really understand the benefits and uses fintech karena penggunaan fintech lebih efisien dan
efektif dibandingkan jasa keuangan lainnya sehingga masyarakat termotivasi untuk menggunakan
fintech.
The definition of effectiveness according to the Big Indonesian Dictionary comes from the
word "effective" which means effect, effect, influence or can bring results. The effectiveness referred
to in this study is the result obtained from the use of a technology that is in accordance with the
purpose of its users. Initially, people still used cash, now with fintech, transactions are easier and
more effective.
Risk is an uncertainty felt by the user that causes harm to the user. The initial risk felt by users
is the risk of cyber crime (cyber risk) (Aulia et al., 2021). According to Narain in (Nizar, 2017) the
existence of fintech besides bringing benefits also has the potential to bring a number of risks. The
earliest fintech risks are borne by consumers, especially data security risks (cyber risks), privacy, and
data ownership and data governance. This risk can arise due to the vulnerability of computer-based
systems and processes that are interrelated and can be exploited by hackers for pleasure or criminal
intent. The fintech business is a business of trust between users and companies, if there is a data leak,
data misuse and so on, it will damage user trust. That way, trust here is very important and of course
the role of the government is needed which can guarantee that the public can avoid the risks of using
fintech.
Based on data from the Association of Indonesian Internet Service Providers (APJII), 98.64%
of internet users are millennials. Therefore I am interested in researching the Effect of Ease of Use
and Risk Level on Effectiveness of Financial Technology (Fintech) in DKI Jakarta.
170
Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No. 2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

II. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK


The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is an analytical tool used to determine the attitude
of user acceptance of the presence of technology (Fatmawati, 2015). The theory developed by Davis
in 1989 is based on the theory of reasoned action (TRA) developed by Fishbein and Ajzen (1975). In
TAM, user acceptance of information systems is determined by two key factors, namely perceived
usefulness and perceived ease of use (Wida et al., 2018). According to (Jogiyanto, 2007), there are
five TAM constructions, these five constructions are as follows:
1. Perceived usefulness.
2. Perceived ease of use
3. Attitude towards behavior or attitude towards using technology
4. Behavioral intention to use technology (behavioral intention to use)
5. Use of actual technology (actual technology use)

TAM theory construction drawings (Fatmawati, 2015)


Another theory that can explain individual acceptance of using technology is Theory of
Planned Behavior (TPB), this theory can explain that trust and risk can affect individuals who are
interested or have a desire to use technology. The theory developed by Ajzen in 1991 has been widely
used to explain usage behavior in the use of technology. TPB has the advantage of being able to
analyze situations when individuals cannot control their behavior (Nurul, 2021). In this study, the
TAM and TPB theories will be combined by taking one of the variables from each of these theories,
namely ease of use, effectiveness and risk.
III. METHODS
The research method used in this study is a quantitative research method. According to
(Sugiyono, 2019) quantitative research is defined as a research method based on the philosophy of
positivism, used to examine certain populations or samples, collecting data using research
instruments, data analysis is quantitative / statistical, with the aim of testing a predetermined
hypothesis.
To find out the effect of the independent variable (X), namely the Level of Ease of Use,
Effectiveness and Risk Level with the dependent variable (Y), namely the Use of Financial
Technology (Fintech), the data collection method in this study used a questionnaire that contains a
list of written statements that given to respondents to respond in the form of google form.

IV. RESULT AND DISCUSSION


Hasil Uji validitas dan reliabilitas
From the results of the Validity Test it proves that the total value of r counts for all question
items has a value exceeding r table 0.196. Therefore, it can be concluded that all items are said to be
valid. While the results of the reliability test if the alpha value is more than 0.6 then the data is declared
reliable. the results of the variable level of ease with a Cronbach alpha coefficient value of 0.953 are
declared reliable. The effectiveness variable with a Cronbach alpha coefficient value of 0.933 is

171
Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No. 2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

declared reliable. The risk level variable with a Cronbach alpha coefficient value of 0.753 is declared
reliable. The fintech use variable with a Cronbach alpha coefficient value of 0.817 is declared reliable.
Hasil Uji Normalitas
Table 1. Normality Test Results
Exact Sig Nilai Kritis Keterangan
0,200 0.05 Normal
Source: Primary data processed by researchers

From the output results above the significant value of 0.200, it is more than 0.05 so that the
data used in this study can be normally distributed using the Kolmogrof Smirnov Test.

Hasil Uji Multikolinieritas


Table 2 Multicollinearity Test Results
Variabel Collinearity Statistics
Tolerance VIF Keterangan

Tingkat Kemudahan 0,559 1,790 Bebas Multikolinieritas

Efektivitas 0,570 1,753 Bebas Multikolinieritas


Tingkat Risiko 0,973 1,028 Bebas Multikolinieritas
Source: Primary data processed by researchers

The table above shows that all independent variables have tolerance values greater than 0.1 and
VIF values less than 10 so that it can be concluded that in this study with the regression model there
was no multicollinearity.

Heteroscedasticity Test Results


Table 3 Heteroscedasticity Test Results
Variabel Sig. Keterangan
Tingkat Kemudahan 0,590 Bebas Heteroskedastisitas
Efektivitas 0,054 Bebas Heteroskedastisitas
Tingkat Risiko 0,331 Bebas Heteroskedastisitas
Source: Primary data processed by researchers

The table above shows that all independent variables have sig values. above 0.05 so that it can
be concluded that the regression model does not have heteroscedasticity.

Multiple Linear Regression Test Results


Table 4 Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analysis
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 4.122 1.349 3.056 .003
Tingkat Kemudahan .331 .121 .279 2.729 .008
Efektivitas .419 .095 .444 4.389 .000
Tingkat Risiko -.054 .024 -.170 -2.198 .030
a. Dependent Variable: Penggunaan Fintech
Source: Primary data processed by researchers
Based on the results in the table above, the regression equation in this study is
Y = 4,122+ 0,331X1 + 0,419X 2 – 0,054X 3 + ℯ

172
Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No. 2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

T test results
Table 5 T Test Results
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 4.122 1.349 3.056 .003
Tingkat Kemudahan .331 .121 .279 2.729 .008
Efektivitas .419 .095 .444 4.389 .000
Tingkat Risiko -.054 .024 -.170 -2.198 .030
a. Dependent Variable: Penggunaan Fintech
Source: Primary data processed by researchers
The results of testing the hypothesis of the Ease of Use variable (X1) have a significant effect
on the use of Fintech because the t_count ≥ t_table is 2.729 > 1.984 and the resulting significance
value is 0.008 which is less than 0.05. Effectiveness (X2) has a significant effect on the use of Fintech
because the t_count ≥ t_table is 4.389 > 1.984 and the resulting significance value is 0.000 which is
less than 0.05. The risk level (X3) has a significant effect on the use of Fintech because the t_count ≥
t_table is 2.198 > 1.985 and the resulting significance value is 0.030 which is less than 0.05.

F test results
Table 6 F Test Results
ANOVAa
Model Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
1 Regression 70.817 3 23.606 25.198 .000b
Residual 89.933 96 .937
Total 160.750 99
a. Dependent Variable: Penggunaan Fintech
b. Predictors: (Constant), Tingkat Risiko, Efektivitas, Tingkat Kemudahan
Source: Primary data processed by researchers

From the results of the F test it is known that the Level of Convenience, Effectiveness and Risk
Level simultaneously or together have a significant effect on the use of Fintech because f_count ≥
f_table, namely 25.198 > 2.70 with a resulting significance value of 0.000 which is smaller than the
level of significance of 0.05. So this means that the Level of Convenience, Effectiveness and Risk
Level together have a significant effect on the Use of Fintech.

Test Results for the Coefficient of Determination (𝐑𝟐 )

Table 7 Test Results for the Coefficient of Determination (R2 )


Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
1 .664a .441 .423 .968
a. Predictors: (Constant), Tingkat Risiko, Efektivitas, Tingkat
Kemudahan
Source: Primary data processed by researchers
Based on the table above, it can be obtained that the magnitude of R Square (R^2) is 0.441.
These results indicate that 44.1% of the variables Level of Convenience, Effectiveness and Risk Level
affect the Use of Fintech. Meanwhile, 55.9% was influenced by other factors that were not included
in this study.
Based on the results of the data analysis that has been carried out on all the data obtained, there
is:
1. The Effect of Convenience Level on the Effectiveness of Fintech

173
Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No. 2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

The results of data analysis show that the level of convenience has a significant positive effect
on the effectiveness of fintech. This means that the higher the convenience level of an e-wallet,
the higher the effectiveness of a fintech. Ease of use is defined as the extent to which a technology
user believes that using a particular technology can be free of effort (Davis, 1989). Ease of use
of a technology will reflect the size of the effectiveness in using the technology. This shows that
the more convenience that can be felt from the use of technology or systems, it can affect the
effectiveness of its users.This research is in line with previous research conducted by Faizah
(2020) and Rahayu (2018) which shows that the level of convenience has a positive influence on
the effectiveness of fintech.
2. The Effect of Risk Level on the Effectiveness of Fintech
The results of the data analysis show that the level of risk has a significant negative effect on the
effectiveness of fintech. According to (Wijayanti, 2017) Risk is an uncertainty and unwanted
consequences in carrying out activities. The fintech business is a business of trust between users
and companies. The higher the level of risk that an individual gets, the lower the individual's
trust in using fintech. Conversely, the lower the level of risk that an individual gets, the higher
the individual's trust in using fintech. This research is also in line with previous research
conducted by Nasir (2021) and Nurdin (2020) which shows that risk has a negative influence on
the effectiveness of fintech.
3. Effect of Convenience Level and Risk Level on the Effectiveness of Fintech
Based on the results of this study, it shows that the variable level of ease of use and level of risk
has an effect on the effectiveness of fintech, this can be proven by the results of the simultaneous
test (F test), obtained 𝑓ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 ≥ 𝑓𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 namely 25.198 > 2.70 with the resulting significance
value of 0.000 smaller than the level of significance 0.05. This means that the Convenience Level
and Risk Level have a significant effect on the Effectiveness of Fintech. This research is also in
line with previous research conducted by Nurul (2021) and Diba (2019) which shows that the
level of ease of use and the level of risk have an influence on the effectiveness of fintech.
V. CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the data analysis that has been carried out on all the data obtained, the
following conclusions can be drawn:
1. The level of convenience (X1) has a significant effect on the effectiveness of Fintech because
the value of 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 ≥ 𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 is 2.729 > 1.984 and the resulting significance value is 0.008
which is less than 0.05. So this means that 𝐻0 is rejected and 𝐻𝑎 is accepted, in other words
that the Ease of Use variable has a positive influence on the Effectiveness of Fintech in the
people of DKI Jakarta.
2. The level of risk (X3) has a significant effect on the effectiveness of Fintech because the value
of 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 ≥ 𝑡𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 is 2.198 > 1.985 and the resulting significance value is 0.030 which is less
than 0.05. Then this means 𝐻0 is rejected and 𝐻𝑎 is accepted. A negative t value indicates that
the Risk Level variable has the opposite relationship to the Effectiveness variable. Thus it can
be concluded that the Risk Level variable has a negative and significant effect on the
effectiveness of Fintech in the people of DKI Jakarta.
3. The level of ease and level of risk simultaneously or jointly have a significant effect on the
effectiveness of Fintech because 𝑓ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 ≥ 𝑓𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 is 25.198 > 2.70 with the resulting
significance value of 0.000 smaller than the level of significance of 0.05. So this means that
the Level of Convenience and the Level of Risk together have a significant effect on the
Effectiveness of Fintech in the people of DKI Jakarta.

VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful to all those involved in State University of Jakarta for supporting this
research, especially to Mr. Harya Kuncara Wiralaga as my supervisor lecture and also to Mr. Dicky
Iranto as my supervisor lecture.

174
Jurnal Multilingual Vol. 3, No. 2 February (2023)
ISSN: 1412-4823 (Print)
ISSN: 2620-625x (Online)

REFERENCES
Aulia, Zulkarnaini, & Ridho Kismawadi, E. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat
masyarakat mengajukan kredit di Financial Technology. Jurnal Investasi Islam, 5(2), 135–152.
https://doi.org/10.32505/jii.v5i2.2391
Fatmawati, E. (2015). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) untuk Menganalisis Sistem
Informasi Perpustakaan. Iqra’: Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 9(1), 1–13.
http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/iqra/article/view/66
Jogiyanto. (2007). Sistem informasi keperilakuan. Andi Offset.
Marchelina, D., & Pratiwi, R. (2018). Pengaruh Persepsi Manfaat, Persepsi Kemudahan,
Persepsi Risiko dan Fitur Layanan terhadap Minat Penggunaan E- Money (Studi Kasus Pada
Pengguna E-Money Kota Palembang). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 1–17.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/162164902.pdf
Nizar, M. A. (2017). Teknologi keuangan (Fintech) : Konsep dan implementasinya di
Indonesia. Warta Fiskal, 5(March), 5–13.
Nurul, cut A. (2021). Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan, Efektivitas, Dan Risiko
Terhadap Minat Bertransaksi Menggunakan Financial Technology (Fintech). 6.
Rahma, T. I. F. (2018). Persepsi Masyarakat Kota Medan Terhadap Penggunaan Financial
Technology (Fintech). At-Tawassuth: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 3(1), 642 – 661.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Wida, P. A. M. W., Yasa, N. N. K., & Sukaatmadja, I. P. G. (2018). APLIKASI MODEL TAM
(TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL)PADA PERILAKU PENGGUNA INSTAGRAM.
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16(1), 59–72.
https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2004010104

175

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy