Research Product 2018-11

A Guide for Effective Platoon Leader – Platoon

Sergeant Co-Leadership

Stefanie Plemmons Shaughnessy

U.S. Army Research Institute

Lauren A. Lanzo, Meredith R. Coats, and Melvin Walker, Jr.

Consortium Universities of Washington

July 2018

United States Army Research Institute

for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

U.S. Army Research Institute
for the Behavioral and Social Sciences

Department of the Army

Deputy Chief of Staff, G1

Authorized and approved:

MICHELLE L. ZBYLUT, Ph.D.

Director

Technical review by

Gregory A. Ruark, U. S. Army Research Institute

NOTICES

DISTRIBUTION: This Research Product has been submitted to the Defense

Information Technical Center (DTIC). Address correspondence concerning ARI reports
to: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Attn: DAPE-
ARI-ZXM,6000 6th Street Building 1464 / Mail Stop: 5610), Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5610.

FINAL DISPOSITION: Destroy this Research Product when it is no longer needed. Do

not return it to the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

NOTE: The findings in this Research Product are not to be construed as an official
Department of the Army position, unless so designated by other authorized documents.
 Form Approved
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188
1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (From - To)
July 2018 Final Jul 2017 – Jul 2018
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

A Guide for Effective Platoon Leader – Platoon Sergeant Co-Leadership 5b. GRANT NUMBER
W911NF-16-2-0092
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
611102
6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER
Stefanie Plemmons Shaughnessy B74F
Lauren A. Lanzo, Meredith R. Coats, Melvin Walker, Jr. 5e. TASK NUMBER
02
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER
1904
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT
U. S. Army Research Institute Consortium Universities of Washington NUMBER
for the Behavioral & Social Sciences 1100 H Street NW, Suite 500
6000 6TH Street (Bldg. 1464) Washington DC 20005-5493
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5610
9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)
ARI
U. S. Army Research Institute
for the Behavioral & Social Sciences 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT
6000 6TH Street (Bldg. 1464 / Mail Stop 5610) NUMBER(S)
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5610 Research Product 2018-11
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release, distribution unlimited.
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ARI POC: Dr. Stefanie Shaughnessy, Foundational Sciences Research Unit

14. ABSTRACT
The platoon leader (PL) – platoon sergeant (PSG) leadership team is a unique and influential pair of roles that exist in
the Army. In order for a platoon to succeed, an effective partnership must exist between the PL and PSG. Current Army
training, however, does not focus on teaching leaders how to effectively partner together. Accordingly, this research
product contains a guide to help leaders achieve a common understanding of their platoon and their partnership as
leaders. The intent is for this guide to be used when a new PL or PSG enters the platoon. The guide contains a
discussion exercise, exemplars from PLs and PSGs, a list of Army doctrine resources, and helpful tips grounded in
scientific evidence. The guide is designed to help PLs and PSGs set the foundation for an effective working
relationship, resulting in an efficient and effective platoon.

15. SUBJECT TERMS

Leadership, Leader Development, Platoon Leaders, Noncommissioned Officers

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION 18. 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE
OF ABSTRACT NUMBER PERSON
OF Gerald F. Goodwin
a. REPORT b. ABSTRACT c. THIS PAGE PAGES 19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER
Unlimited
Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified
703-545-2410

i
ii
Research Product 2018-11

A Guide for Effective Platoon Leader – Platoon

Sergeant Co-Leadership

Stefanie Plemmons Shaughnessy

U.S. Army Research Institute

Lauren A. Lanzo, Meredith R. Coats, and Melvin Walker, Jr.

Consortium Universities of Washington

Foundational Science Research Unit

Gerald F. Goodwin, Chief

July 2018

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of many Army personnel who supported this
research effort. In particular, we would like to thank the platoon leaders and platoon sergeants
we spoke with as part of this research; they were instrumental in the development of the
Discussion Guide. We wish to extend our gratitude to our colleague, Dr. Jonathan Kochert, who
helped support this effort.

iv
A GUIDE FOR EFFECTIVE PLATOON LEADER - PLATOON SERGEANT CO-
LEADERSHIP

CONTENTS___________________________________________________________________

Page

INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………………… 1

DISCUSSION GUIDE ………………………………………………………………………. 2

Guide Purpose ……………………………………….…………………………………… 2

Guide Audience ………………………………………………………………………….. 2

Guide Instructions ……………………….……………………………………………….. 2

Guide Supplement ……………………………………………………………………. 2

Army Doctrine Quick Reference …………………………………………………….. 2

REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………………. 3

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A: DISCUSSION GUIDE ………………………….………………………… A-1

APPENDIX B: DISCUSSION GUIDE SUPPLEMENT ………………………….……….. B-1

APPENDIX C: ARMY DOCTRINE QUICK REFERENCE ……………………………… C-1

APPENDIX D: RESEARCH PRODUCT POCKET FLIP BOOK VERSION PROOFS .… D-1

APPENDIX E: RESEARCH PRODUCT TRIFOLD VERSION ...………………………… E-1

v
vi
 A GUIDE FOR EFFECTIVE PLATOON LEADER - PLATOON SERGEANT
CO-LEADERSHIP

Introduction

The platoon leader (PL) – platoon sergeant (PSG) leadership team is a unique and
influential pair of roles that exist in the Army. The working relationship between the PL and
PSG can have large effects on the platoon (e.g., climate). It impacts the development of officers
throughout the remainder of their careers and can influence NCO development, as well. Army
doctrine makes it clear that the relationship between officers and NCOs is critical to the success
of the U.S. Army (ADRP 6-22, U.S. Department of the Army, 2012; TC 7-22.7, U.S.
Department of the Army, 2015). It is not uncommon for relationships to encounter difficulties,
though, and certain partnerships, or aspects of partnerships, may prove challenging for those in
leadership roles. Improving the relationship between a PL and their PSG improves the success
of the unit, and the effectiveness of the U.S. Army.

Many of the tools and trainings currently available to officers and NCOs focus on
learning tasks necessary for performing their duties or managing relationships with superiors and
subordinates. Less focus is placed on developing working relationships that ultimately enhance
unit effectiveness. One PSG interviewed in this research emphasized the need for tools designed
for PLs and PSGs:

“I think it’s super critical. It is the most critical relationship in the Army. It is the one
that ultimately makes decisions that affect the platoon in the next 20 minutes… It is the
most important relationship and there [are] not enough development classes. Not enough
guidance.”

To fill this gap, the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences has
developed a guide to assist in building a professional relationship between two leaders. The
intent is for this guide to be used when a new PL or PSG enters the platoon, enabling the two
leaders to arrive at a shared understanding of their partnership and their platoon. The questions
in the guide were developed from discussions with PLs and PSGs and are based upon their
experiences and recommendations. The focus of the guide is on getting to know your
counterpart better, setting and managing expectations, and general communication. The
discussion guide is meant to set a foundation for continual communication between the PL and
PSG which will benefit the platoon. As a PL emphasized:

“I would say a successful relationship is a constant dialogue. Never a day you shouldn’t
be texting or face to face talking 30 times a day. If you aren’t doing that something is
wrong… If you are communicating well you have half the battle done.”

This document provides a summary description of the Discussion Guide product and associated
supplemental material. The Discussion Guide is provided in Appendix A. The Discussion
Guide Supplement, including exemplars from PLs and PSGs, specific Army doctrine relevant to
the topic, and helpful tips, is provided in Appendix B. Appendix C contains a compiled list of
relevant Army doctrine for quick reference.

1
 Discussion Guide

Guide Purpose

The Discussion Guide was developed to help Army leaders set a foundation for effective
communication and leadership as members of a leader team. It is meant to apply concepts from
both Army doctrine and scientific research in an accessible format based on conversational
questions. Leader teams who talk through the questions in the guide should have a greater
awareness of themselves, their counterpart, and their unit. The result should be a unit that is
more cohesive, effective, and efficient.

Guide Audience

The concepts associated with building effective working relationships between joint
leaders could be used at all leadership levels. However, junior officers and their NCOs were
identified as the target training audience. As stated in TC 7-22.7, “The officer/NCO relationship
benefits officers at all levels, but especially junior officers” (p.5-5). The platoon is the first level
of leadership where an officer and NCO are paired together as a leader team. Therefore, junior
officers and their NCOs are best poised to benefit from learning how to work effectively with a
counterpart, whomever that counterpart may be. A group of company commanders and first
sergeants interviewed in this research emphasized that the PL and PSG positions were an early
opportunity to learn how to work effectively with any individual.

Guide Instructions

The guide focuses on areas that PLs and PSGs identified as important aspects for leader
teams to discuss. Topics include communication, unit goals, making decisions as a team, and
managing conflict. The guide is designed to facilitate a conversation that can occur over one or
many time points whenever the PL and PSG have some time to spare (see Appendix A). As
noted in the guide, the product is not meant to be used for formal counseling. It is meant to be
one tool in a leader’s larger toolkit.

Guide Supplement. The supplement (Appendix B) provides additional information for

each of the questions posed in the conversational guide found in Appendix A. It includes general
takeaways for each topic, quotes from PLs and PSGs, Army doctrine specific to the topic, and
tips for leaders if they are struggling with that specific aspect in their partnership.

Army Doctrine Quick Reference. The product ends with a compiled list of Army
doctrine publications (Appendix C) that are relevant to PLs and PSGs. References relate to
officers and NCOs generally, as well as the key topics in the guide, such as roles and
responsibilities, communication, managing conflict, and decision making. The Quick Reference
provides additional reading and resources for those who seek it.

2
 References

U.S. Department of the Army (2012). Army Doctrine Reference Publication 6-22 (ADRP 6-22)
Army Leadership. Retrieved from http://cape.army.mil/repository/doctrine/adrp6-22.pdf

U.S. Department of the Army (2015). Training Circular 7-22.7 (TC 7-22.7). Noncommissioned
Officer Guide. Retrieved from
http://www.apd.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/tc7_22x7.pdf

3
 APPENDIX A

DISCUSSION GUIDE

A-1
 Discussion Guide

This guide is designed to facilitate a conversation between a platoon leader and a platoon
sergeant and aid in setting the foundation for an effective leadership team. The questions
provide a starting point for you and your counterpart to learn about each other and the platoon, as
well as talk about expectations and a way forward for your unit. Take some time to talk through
the different questions and get to know each other better. This guide can be used in one sitting or
can be used over multiple conversations when you have some extra time. It is not meant to
replace formal counselings, nor is it meant to be a check-the-box task. Using it is voluntary, but
could be helpful to you and your platoon.

1. What are your expectations for your role?

a. What do you see as your primary responsibilities?

2. What are your expectations for my role?

a. What do you see as my primary responsibilities?
b. What does your ideal platoon leader/platoon sergeant partner look like?

3. What are your expectations for our joint leadership role?

a. What boundaries do you view for each role? What is my lane and what is your
lane?

4. What do you hope to gain from this relationship?

a. How can we help each other reach our long-term personal and professional goals?

5. What is your preference for communication? Ideally, how often do you see us
communicating about tasks or issues facing the platoon?

6. How do you see us making decisions about the platoon?

a. What decisions do you see us making together? What decisions do you see us
making independently?

7. How do you see us best managing conflict or resolving disagreements?

a. What do we do if we are having issues coming to consensus or resolving
problems?
b. Are there preferences you have or things that work well for you?
c. Are there things I should avoid that are more difficult or problematic?

8. What do you feel are your strengths and weaknesses?

a. How can we best use our strengths and help each other develop our weaknesses?

9. How can we help to empower or support each other as leaders of the platoon? What do
you need from me?

A-2
 a. How can I help you better lead our platoon?

10. What is your vision for the platoon?

a. What goals do you have for the platoon?
b. What does success look like to you?
c. How do you think we should track progress towards these goals?

11. What do you think is currently working well with the platoon? What do you think can be
improved?
a. What are the main issues you feel the platoon is currently facing?
i. How do you see us addressing these issues?

12. What has the company commander or first sergeant identified as working well or needing
improvement within the platoon?

A-3
 APPENDIX B

DISCUSSION GUIDE SUPPLEMENT

B-1
 Discussion Guide Supplement

The Discussion Guide Supplement contains additional information for each of the topics found
in the Discussion Guide. Each section starts with Leader Experiences, which includes both a
general synopsis and individual quotes collected during research conversations with platoon
leaders and platoon sergeants. The next piece, “Army Doctrine,” contains a quick reference list
of where you can find doctrine specific to the topic. Each section ends with “Helpful Tips”
grounded in science.

ROLE EXPECTATIONS

Guide Questions:
1. What are your expectations for your role?
o What do you see as your primary responsibilities?
2. What are your expectations for my role?
o What do you see as my primary responsibilities?
o What does your ideal platoon leader/platoon sergeant partner look like?
3. What are your expectations for our joint leadership role?
o What boundaries do you view for each role? What is my lane and what is your lane?

Leader Experiences:

Many leaders expressed frustration in their lack of knowledge about each role, despite having
some training. Leaders agreed on the importance of knowing their role, knowing their partner’s
role, and clarifying with their counterpart about roles and expectations to make sure both leaders
were on the same page. In addition to understanding each partner’s individual roles, leaders also
expressed the need to have a shared understanding of how the independent roles work together to
lead an effective platoon. Many leaders noted that problems occur when one partner doesn’t stay
in his or her lane.

“[I] think it starts with sitting down and doing an initial talk… where you talk about
what do you want to get done, how do you see things going forwards, what are the
duties and responsibilities between the two of you. Could be as simple as ‘hey I want
you to be around when writing up [a] training plan but I’ll actually submit slides but
need your input for this. Or when this comes up.’ But having that dividing or that main
hash out of where the lines are, who is responsible for what. Once you have that
conversation it gets the ball rolling in the right direction of communication going
forward.”
-First Lieutenant, 5 months of experience as a platoon leader

B-2
 “Articulate your expectations and be reasonable if you are talking about expectations.
Learn and adapt your thought process at the same time.”
-Sergeant First Class, 9 months of experience as a platoon sergeant

“It’s more important to just be able to talk to them about what a good or ideal PL is.
Your ideal PL, build me a picture of that. Pick their brain on that. How do you go
about resolving disagreements?”
-Second Lieutenant, 7 months of experience as a platoon leader

“There needs to be clearly established boundaries on what roles belong to what

individuals. Shared understanding of when you can step over the bounds if there is
comfort and understanding. A PL should be able to rely on his PSG. Really, really
important for them to understand they are the be-all-end-all, but we are their advisors.
Our job is to make them successful. A PL has to rely on his PSG and the PSG needs to
be open and tell [the] PL when he is right and wrong or deviating off track.”
-Sergeant First Class, 2 years of experience as a platoon sergeant

“Really trying to stay true to your word and trying to make sure you have an
understanding of the overall direction or what the decision is, sometimes it is a matter
of communication. Other one might [say], ‘Hey before you say yes/no maybe check in
with me.’ Or only give [a] tentative ‘Hey yes possibly but let me verify with the PL/ let
me verify with the PSG before calling orders.’”
-First Lieutenant, 5 months of experience as a platoon leader

Army Doctrine:
• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command. Sections 10-12.
• ADP 7-0 (2012). Training Units and Developing Leaders. Section 24.
• ATP 3-21.8 2016. Infantry Platoon and Squad. Sections 1-46 to 1-48.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. Sections 1-5, 1-21.
• TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned Officer Guide. Sections 4.18, 5.1-5.2, 8.1.

Helpful Tips:
1. Make sure to take the time to understand your role and responsibilities. Being aware of
each role will help you and your partner stay in your lane, which can increase overall
effectiveness and efficiency of your unit1.
2. Discuss your view of your role and your counterpart’s role to make sure you have a
shared understanding of your respective responsibilities and how they work together to
efficiently lead the platoon.
o Having a shared understanding of your purpose and supporting each other can
lead to improved team effectiveness1.
3. The four best ways to avoid role ambiguity are understanding2:

B-3
 o The scope of your (and your counterpart’s) responsibilities.
o The necessary behaviors to carry out your (and your counterpart’s)
responsibilities.
o How your (and your counterpart’s) role responsibilities are evaluated.
o The consequences of not fulfilling role responsibilities.

References

1
Beauchamp, M. R., Bray, S. R., Eys, M. A., & Carron, A. V. (2002). Role ambiguity, role
efficacy, and role performance: Multidimensional and mediational relationships within
interdependent sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(3), 229-
242.
2
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964).
Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. Oxford, England: John
Wiley.

B-4
 COMMUNICATION

Guide Questions:
4. What is your preference for communication? Ideally, how often do you see us
communicating about tasks or issues facing the platoon?

Leader Experiences:

Frequent and high-quality communication is a major contributor to high quality relationships and
was one of the most prevalent discussion points that emerged from conversations with leaders.
Communication between the leaders of the platoon impacts how and what information the
Soldiers receive, and many leaders explained how poor communication led to confusion among
the Soldiers and poor unit effectiveness.

“Come together; what do we need to do to prepare for tomorrow. With my PSG once
or twice a week we will look at the calendar, we will see where we can squeeze in SGT
time training and do small Army training on the side to make sure platoon is ready and
effective when we deploy. An effective team uses those sync meetings to effectively
manage their time.”
-Second Lieutenant, 5 months of experience as a platoon leader

“He does a morning sync and afternoon sync and compares notes about the daily
agenda and how to meet that. Synchronization is where they get on the same page.
What is my agenda for the day, what is your agenda for the day, set out PL will do
planning, property management. Go to meetings, he will go to his meetings make sure
Soldiers will do what they need to do. Come back at the end of the day and have
another sync.”
-Second Lieutenant, 9 months of experience as a platoon leader

“Communication is very important. Even if you come from two totally different places
in life, two different walks of life, you came to the same profession, same goal
ultimately. Others like to do it a different way, others do it their own way.
Communicate back and forth to each other to achieve [a] common goal without low
morale and bickering and arguing. That is how you foster a good climate in your
platoon amongst your men.”
-Staff Sergeant, 2.5 years of experience as a platoon sergeant

“Definitely open discussions tend to help sometimes…Maybe have a good heart-to-

heart, can even include [the] section sergeant or senior ones.”
-Staff Sergeant, 1 year of experience as a platoon sergeant

B-5
 “Constant interaction and having good knowledge of [the] platoon itself, just going
over the events of the day. If you can start off with that every morning it makes it a lot
better.”
-Sergeant First Class, 1 year of experience as a platoon sergeant

Army Doctrine:
• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command. Sections 9, 24, 36-37.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. Sections 1-8, 3-11, 3-35, 3-36, 3-22.

Helpful Tips:
• Although it may seem inconsequential, small talk can have huge impacts on a
relationship1, 2. Frequent small talk can help you and your counterpart get to know each
other and strengthen interpersonal relationships by showing you value that team member.
o Often, informal and relaxed communication reduces tension between
communicators1, 3, 4, 5.
• When discussing issues or actions to be taken in the platoon, make sure your comments
are focused on behaviors or events, rather than the person1, 6.
o Focusing on issues with a person rather than behaviors or characteristics of a
problem can make that person feel personally targeted, which can elicit negative
feelings and defensive reactions. Instead, try and be supportive and validate their
contribution to the team1.
o Make sure to show your counterpart that you are open to his or her ideas and
willing to consider his or her perspective.
o Allow your counterpart equal opportunity to speak and try to stay on topic1, 7.
o Avoid being overly rigid and inflexible in your opinion, or indifferent towards
your counterpart when having a conversation. Try not to give the impression that
you are superior to whomever you are speaking, regardless of rank1, 8.
• Another key component of good communication is active listening. This can decrease
the likelihood that the message will be distorted or misunderstood1, 9.
o When listening, be sure to withhold initial judgments and probe your partner to
elaborate, provide more information, or clarify vague or confusing statements1.
o Repeating the information back to the speaker can help ensure you understand the
message and shows him or her you are attentive and value their opinion1, 10.
• Nonverbal communication, such as body language (e.g., rolling your eyes), can send
conflicting signals that can undermine your message1, 11, 12, 13.
o For example, if you tell your counterpart you understand and value their opinion
but demonstrate body language inconsistent with that sentiment1, 14, he or she may
feel your words are inauthentic, which can lower the quality of communication
and in turn, damage your relationship.

B-6
 References

1
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for
teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2),
503-530.
2
Jackson, D. E. (1988). Interpersonal Communication for Technically Trained Managers. New
York, NY: Quorum.
3
Argyris, C. (1966). Interpersonal barriers to decision making. Harvard Business Review, 44(2),
84-97.
4
Likert, R. (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6
Gibb, J. R. (1961). Defensive Communication. Journal of Communication, 11(3), 141-148.
7
Wiemann, J. M., & Backlund, P. (1980). Current theory and research in communicative
competence. Review of Educational Research, 50(1), 185-199.
8
Driskell, J. E., Olmstead, B., & Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in
task groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 51-60.
9
Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective.
Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 465-487.
10
Whetten, D. A. & Cameron, K. S. (1991). Developing Management Skills (2nd ed.). New York,
NY: Harper-Collins.
11
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and Context: Essays on Body Motion Communication.
Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
12
Cooper, K. (1979). Nonverbal Communication for Business Success. New York, NY: Amacom.
13
Harrison, R. P. (1974). Beyond Words. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14
Buck, R. (1984). The Communication of Emotion. New York, NY: Guilford.

B-7
 DECISION-MAKING

Guide Questions:
5. How do you see us making decisions about the platoon?
o What decisions do you see us making together? What decisions do you see us
making independently?

Leader Experiences:

Many leaders suggested making joint decisions and moving forward as a united front when
implementing decisions within the platoon. They noted the importance of checking in with each
other before decisions were made. For time sensitive decisions, leaders expressed the
importance of letting your partner know as soon as possible about decisions made when they
weren’t present.

“[Both leaders] are in charge of the household and have their own jobs and together
we make decisions. [We] have different things to do but we work together on
it…Neither [leader] should just make a decision. If it’s any decision that is truly
affecting the platoon or a Soldier they should talk to each other. It’s a reality check
back and forth with each other.”
-First Lieutenant, 1 month experience as a platoon leader

“[I was] told to not make any major changes to platoon for 1-2 months and try to get a
feel for the platoon. After that you can make changes as you see fit. Not trying to be
there like ‘Hey I’m the one in charge. I’m going to change all this.’ Give him the
respect that he knows what is going on and is smart in a lot of different ways. Giving
that off the bat shows you value his opinion. Even from then not trying to boss him
around just ask…everything is a discussion, not ‘This is because I said so.’ Unless time
sensitive, but if not time sensitive there is no reason to be bossy, no reason not to have
a discussion.”
-First Lieutenant, 7 months experience as a platoon leader

“Not always going to agree, but need to be able to listen to ideas and come up with [a]
mutual decision that benefits [the] whole platoon, [the] whole organization.”
-Sergeant First Class

“It should be joint power. Both [leaders] should have a voice in the decision-making
process.”
-First Sergeant, 6 years of experience as a platoon sergeant

B-8
Army Doctrine:
• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command. Sections 36-37.

Helpful Tips:
• It is important to allow each individual to have a voice in the decision making process.
This can lead to more constructive discussions, debate, and better participation in the
decision process1.
o Ultimately, this will lead to better outcomes for the platoon1.
o Allowing both parties to participate in the decision making process can also
improve trust2.
• When making decisions, it can be helpful to maintain awareness of outside influences and
demands to remind both leaders that the decision should be met with external approval3.
• When making decisions, try to stay level-headed and keep emotions to a minimum. Keep
personal criticisms out of the discussion. Getting too emotional or personal can decrease
decision-making quality and performance3, 4. When discussing ideas and opinions,
sometimes challenges to an idea can improve the decision quality5. A “devil’s advocate”
can be useful if the challenges are objective and constructive.
• Try to integrate both PL and PSG knowledge and perspectives when reaching agreement
for a decision.
o Reaching agreement when making a decision is often necessary for successfully
implementing the decision.
o Integrating both perspectives has additional benefits of gaining a better
understanding of the problem and why some alternatives may be better than
others3.

References

1
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An
investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management
Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
2
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and
implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(4), 611-628.
3
Bergman, J. Z., Rentsch, J. R., Small, E. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, S. M. (2012). The
shared leadership process in decision-making teams. The Journal of Social Psychology,
152(1), 17-42.
4
De Dreu, C. K. & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance,
and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
5
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top
management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology,
85(1), 102-111.

B-9
 MANAGING CONFLICT

Guide Questions:
6. How do you see us best managing conflict or resolving disagreements?
o What do we do if we are having issues coming to consensus or resolving
problems?
o Are there preferences you have or things that work well for you?
o Are there things I should avoid that are more difficult or problematic?

Leader Experiences:

One of the most pressing issues leaders mentioned was arguing in front of your Soldiers which
can cause conflict to trickle down to the platoon, lowering morale and creating a divide in loyalty
among the Soldiers. Many leaders noted the importance of managing conflict behind closed
doors and presenting a united front to the platoon. Many leaders also offered advice to “leave
your ego at the door” when managing conflict with your counterpart. If the conflict can’t be
solved at your level, some leaders suggested approaching the company commander and first
sergeant when necessary.

“[A] healthy [relationship is] one where [leaders] can openly, and especially behind
closed doors, openly discuss plans and what needs to be done…then fully understand
the line of when the discussion is done and the decision has been made…then in front
of the Soldiers be able to show a united force and united line for executing what needs
to be done. Don’t always have to agree but need to do that in front of everyone else to
go forward with the plan and execute it in front of the Soldiers.”
-First Lieutenant, 5 months of experience as a platoon leader

“It’s not our first day in the Army. [We] should be able to take a step back, before I do
something stupid, try to see his side, see my side. Try to do this, or we can do this. Take
a second before being too high strung or letting your emotion get the best of you.
‘Alright sir, let’s do this. Alright, cool.’”
-Sergeant First Class, 1 year of experience as a platoon sergeant

“We would get into it and had our arguments, but we were able to compromise, we
accomplished the missions, talked about who had responsibilities, were just totally
successful. We were able to separate work and personality. I was allowed to voice my
opinion without repercussion.”
-First Lieutenant, 1 year of experience as a platoon leader

B-10
 “If you can have closed door arguments or disagreements but work through it between
yourselves and come up with something positive once you go out and talk to everyone
and have the same mind for the plan that is going to affect everyone positively…they
will see you are both in it for the same objectives. If you go at it with two different ideas
they will be split as well, but if you have [a] united front they will work with you
better.”
-First Lieutenant, 6 months of experience as a platoon leader

Army Doctrine:
• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command. Sections 8-37.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. Table 7-13.

Helpful Tips:
• All relationships and teams inevitably encounter conflict; however, not all conflict is
inherently bad. It can be healthy to team functioning if handled well1.
• Conflict can arise from many sources, such as differing goals or objectives, interests,
values, and miscommunications or misunderstandings1, 2. It can signal the need for
change or a problem that needs to be addressed1.
• The key to managing conflict is to confront it rather than avoid it, and approach the issue
constructively, civilly, and without personal attacks or threats1.
• Constructive conflict can decrease stress, communicate dissatisfaction with the current
state of the team, foster innovation, and ultimately create more stable relationships1, 3.
o Alternately, avoiding conflict can create a hostile environment and reduce team
effectiveness1, 4, 5.
• Productive conflict management behaviors include1:
o Active listening – this can decrease conflict arising from miscommunications.
o Generating alternative solutions, finding common goals, and effectively
communicating your perspective – this can decrease conflict arising from joint
decision-making issues.
o Remaining open to ideas and perspectives different from your own – this can
decrease conflict arising from different opinions, attitudes, values, interests etc.
• One of the most important things to remember is to not personally attack others when
disagreeing and managing conflict. Personal attacks on others can create negative
feelings of self-worth, increase defensive reactions, and damage interpersonal
relationships1.

References

1
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for
teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2),
503-530.

B-11
2
Thomas, K. W. (1977). Toward multi-dimensional values in teaching: The example of conflict
behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 2(3), 484-490.
3
Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
4
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of
Psychology, 41(1), 585-634.
5
Nemeth, C. J., & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups
and organizations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 175-210.

B-12
 LEARNING FROM EACH OTHER

Guide Questions:
7. What do you hope to gain from this relationship?
o How can we help each other reach our long-term personal and professional goals?
8. What do you feel are your strengths and weaknesses?
o How can we best use our strengths and help each other develop our weaknesses?

Leader Experiences:

Leaders who viewed this joint partnership as a positive experience noted the importance of being
willing to learn from each other, as each leader has unique experiences, knowledge, and skills to
contribute to the platoon and the partnership. Many noted that both the PL and PSG are
necessary for an effective unit, and that the leaders can complement each other’s strengths to
benefit the platoon. Importantly, many PLs expressed a desire for their more experienced PSG
to be willing to mentor, advise, and help them develop as leaders.

“Eventually that PL can go away and if he can take that knowledge away from [the]
PSG I would imagine that would probably help him down the road. Same for [the]
PSG, [it] would make it easy for [a] new PL if [the] PSG knew some of what PL has to
do so he can help. They should both be involved with everything that goes on a daily
basis to teach [each other]. You will never know everything you need to know. Never …
Can’t be too proud to ask for help so to speak. If [the] PL is saying his thing and I
don’t understand what he is saying I would like to think I’ve never been too proud to
ask what he is saying. [If] he doesn’t understand, he has to be willing to set his ego
aside and ask me to explain it a little bit better.”
-Staff Sergeant

“Ideally [the] PSG shouldn’t have any problem that this young, inexperienced leader is
in charge. They should look at it as someone they can mentor to be a better leader.
They need that mentorship. [The] PL should look at [the] PSG as [a] mentor to go to
when they have questions and ask how they should do things right and then tweak it to
make it their own. I am responsible for plan, but go to [the] PSG and say ‘You have
done this a million times. Show me to do this right.’”
-Second Lieutenant, 6 months of experience as a platoon leader

“Humility is a huge thing. I don’t know how many times in [the] first 6 months I said
‘I don’t know.’ It doesn’t subordinate yourself to your PSG, but it brings you down to a
more humble approach of how do I learn from my NCO. Help me learn. That is their
job to help you learn and be better. Don’t say ‘I know everything, I learned it at
school.’”
-Second Lieutenant, 8 months of experience as a platoon leader

B-13
 “It’s more about adapting to each other and adapt to strength and weakness and
[having] communication to build that team. As long as you have communication and
trust, I have found it beneficial to have many NCOs and learn from many SMEs and
their experiences. It’s an opportunity to be randomly assigned and adjust to different
people, it shows your capability as a leader.”
-First Lieutenant, 2 years and 9 months experience as a platoon leader

“Complementary skills. You both have knowledge in different realms…so you balance
each other out and execute as a team.”
-Second Lieutenant, 7 months of experience as a platoon leader

“It shouldn’t be one is greater than the other. You both need [the other] to make it run
effectively. You don’t have one or the other there’s no point. If you only need one
power why do you need the other? What’s the point? You need both.”
-Staff Sergeant, 1.5 years of experience as a platoon sergeant

Army Doctrine:
• ADP 6.0 (2014). Mission Command. Section 12.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. Section 1-6.
• TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned Officer Guide. Sections 4.18, 5.1-5.2.

Helpful Tips:
• Approach this relationship with an openness to learning from your counterpart.
o Individuals who are more focused on learning and mastering skills, as opposed to
focusing solely on performing, are more likely to seek out challenges, learn from
these experiences, acquire more skills and knowledge, and ultimately outperform
those who do not have this learning focus1.
 Focusing solely on performance rather than learning is associated with an
increased fear of failure and lower self-efficacy when failures occur. This
can hinder the ability to learn from failures and challenging experiences2.
• Learning from someone with more experience is important to personal and professional
development.
o Learning from more experienced members of the organization (such as mentors)
can result in higher performance and long-term career outcomes3, 4.
• Demonstrate your willingness to learn from your partner. Showing your openness to his
or her advice and knowledge can improve the relationship between leadership partners5.
o If the more experienced partner feels as if their counterpart is unwilling to learn,
he or she is likely to have more negative feelings about the relationship, resulting
in less support for the less experienced partner5.
o Overall, these negative feelings can result in negative outcomes for both leaders5.

B-14
 • Be proactive about seeking information. Proactive behaviors (especially from
newcomers to the unit) such as information seeking improves individual and unit
performance, as well as satisfaction within the unit 4.
• It is important to both seek and provide constructive feedback from/to your partner.
o Learning to take constructive feedback is a vital component of a healthy working
relationship5.
o Exchanging feedback can increase your performance as individuals and as a
leadership team by helping each other to learn and adjust your actions and
strategies6, 7, 8, 9.

References

1
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10),
1040-1048.
2
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
3
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated
with mentoring for protégée: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–
136.
4
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Chao, G. T., & Bauer, T. N. (2017). Taking stock of two relational
aspects of organizational life: Tracing the history and shaping the future of socialization
and mentoring research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 324-337.
5
Eby, L. T., Durley, J. R., Evans, S. C., & Ragins, B. R. (2008). Mentors' perceptions of negative
mentoring experiences: Scale development and nomological validation. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 93(2), 358-373.
6
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A
historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention
theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
7
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of
active feedback seeking. Academy of Management journal, 34(2), 251-280.
8
Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical
formulation. The Journal of General Psychology, 54(2), 279-299.
9
Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.

B-15
 SUPPORT AND EMPOWER EACH OTHER

Guide Questions:
9. How can we help to empower or support each other as leaders of the platoon? What do
you need from me?
o How can I help you better lead our platoon?

Leader Experiences:

Leaders noted how important it is to not undermine their counterpart. Undermining one leader
can lead to insubordination by Soldiers; if one leader does not have the loyalty and respect of the
platoon, they cannot effectively guide the Soldiers within the platoon. Ultimately, this can
impact the platoon’s mission. Success requires both leaders.

“If the PSG doesn’t support his PL whole heartedly, it can really easily lead to a
situation where the loyalty is split. The platoon is more willing to follow [the] PSG than
[the] PL. [The PSG] needs to do his part not to create insubordination, needs to show
he supports [the] PL. Depending on [the] time [the PL] arrives, the Joes and NCOs are
more familiar and [the] PL is new. Don’t know if they can trust him, if he deserves
their loyalty. In [the] intervening time they will follow [the] PSG’s lead and [the] PSG
needs to give [the] PL [the] benefit of the doubt.”
-First Lieutenant, 1 year of experience as a platoon leader

“In my relationship we try to empower each other. I try to give him info to run it
without having to interrupt and he lets Soldiers know what I do behind the scenes.
They don’t see my face or what I do. He creates [a] face for me and I give him the
power to run the platoon without me having to interrupt. We build each other up
rather than saying one or the other has the power. Unfortunately [the] PSG puts out
news about staying late or weekend work. So when I get good news I give it to him so
he can be the good news fairy as well. Ways to empower each other.”
-First Lieutenant, 2 years and 9 months of experience as a platoon leader

Army Doctrine:
• TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned Officer Guide. Sections 3.7, 5.1-5.2, 8.1.

Helpful Tips:
• Make sure to demonstrate support for your counterpart at all times, especially in front of
the troops. In order for the platoon to be effective, Soldiers need to view their leaders as
united and capable in their roles.
• Providing support can include both work- and role-related support as well as emotional
support.
B-16
 o Work-related support includes providing information and feedback to your
counterpart. This can be extremely useful for new leaders as they learn and adjust
to the role1.
o Emotional support includes demonstrating empathy, caring, and encouragement,
which can be vital to reducing stress and increasing commitment to the unit and
the Army1, 2.

References

1
Maertz, C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived
organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal
of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059-1075.
2
Beehrr, T. A. (1985). Organizational stress and employee effectiveness: A job characteristics
approach. In: Beehr, T.A. and Bhagat, R. S. (Eds) Human Stress and Cognition in
Organizations, (pp. 57-82). New York: Wiley.

B-17
 PLATOON VISION AND GOALS

Guide Questions:
10. What is your vision for the platoon?
o What goals do you have for the platoon?
o What does success look like to you?
o How do you think we should track progress towards these goals?
11. What do you think is currently working well with the platoon? What do you think can be
improved?
o What are the main issues you feel the platoon is currently facing?
 How do you see us addressing these issues?

Leader Experiences:

One of the most agreed on themes throughout the discussions with leaders was the importance of
understanding and agreeing on a shared vision for the platoon, including having shared goals.
Leaders said that having a common understanding of what the unit needs to improve upon was
important to developing an effective platoon. Similarly, leaders discussed the importance of
being on the same page when resolving issues and problems within the unit. Many suggested
having open conversations about what’s going right and wrong in the unit and then working
together to resolve any shortcomings.

“Set goals and what is our vision for the platoon.… You don’t know much but you can
set goals with PSG, your PSG can set goals and you can use those to measure success
as platoon leadership. Provide a vision and a path for your platoon to follow. I have
seen this in coaching teams, in leading my platoon anytime we have a clear direct
vision or a goal to meet we are pretty effective in doing it. We have been really good at
doing it with PT. Identifying shortfalls and getting our platoon where we want it to be
in the realm of physical fitness.”
-Second Lieutenant, 9 months of experience as a platoon leader

“He comes in do a little meet me, talk about goals and intents. Talks about platoon,
what is going on, and then PL talks about goals and what he wants from SGT, section
SGT, team, whatever. If they understand they move on and talk about what they want
to do with goals they created together.”
-Staff Sergeant, 1 year of experience as a platoon sergeant

“We need to talk to each other if no one else does and figure out what is going on with
[the] company. Be on same page, support each other, have same goal, and having
everyone know you are on the same team. Not just supporting each other is important.”
-First Lieutenant, 1 year of experience as a platoon leader

B-18
 “All about being a team and working together to solve issues rather that one person
trying to spearhead.”
-Staff Sergeant, 10 months of experience as platoon sergeant

“Platoon Sergeant and Platoon Leader have to discuss issues. If we do have Soldier
issues, we want to keep [it at] its lowest level within ethics and protecting [the] Soldier.”
-Sergeant First Class, 7 years of experience as a platoon sergeant

Army Doctrine:
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. Section 1-22, 3-106; Table 1-2.
• TC 7-22.7. (2015). Noncommissioned Officer Guide. Section 8.1.

Helpful Tips:
• Tips for shared goals
o Make sure to be on the same page as your counterpart when setting goals and
sharing your vision for the platoon.
o Sometimes when working in pairs or teams, individual members may have
personal goals that are not consistent with team goals1.
 Having shared goals and a shared purpose among team members is crucial
for team success2 as it results in increased perceptions that your teammates
have similar values and objectives3, 4, which can result in higher quality
communication, social integration, group affiliation, and cohesion1.
 Shared goals can also increase beliefs among team members that the team
will support you when striving to attain these valued outcomes which can
increase satisfaction with your partner or team1.
o The impact of shared goals between you and your partner likely will trickle down
to your subordinates3, 5. Unit goals help Soldiers determine on which activities
they should focus their effort6. This becomes even clearer when the two unit
leaders have and express the same vision and goal for the team.
 If each leader has a different vision and set of goals for the unit, Soldiers
may be confused about which goals to focus on, which may hinder team
performance.
o The key to creating unity in shared goals is to set goals together. This helps
increase overlap between each leader’s personal goals and goals set for the team2,
7, 8
, as well as increase the quality of the goals that are set2, 9.

B-19
 • Tips for overall goal-setting
o Simply having shared goals may not be effective if the goals that are set are not
appropriate for platoon success. Below are some general tips for effective goal
setting:
 Use SMART goals10. Goals are related to performance when they are
specific and difficult (but attainable) as long as the person (or team) is
committed to the goal, does not have conflicting goals, and has the
necessary knowledge and skills to attain it6.
• Specific – goals should be specific (e.g., target PT standards) as
opposed to vague “do your best” goals.
• Measurable – if possible, set goals in which overall performance or
progress can be measured. This can help with monitoring
performance and adjusting efforts when necessary.
• Attainable – setting goals that are not reasonably attainable can
impact unit morale and satisfaction.
• Relevant – goals that are more relevant to the platoon are more
likely to be viewed as important and meaningful, thus increasing
effort towards attainment.
• Time-bound – goals should have a specific timeline to guide effort
and monitor performance.
o Phases of goal setting11 – These general phases are a good framework for setting
and monitoring goals and should be conducted together with your counterpart.

Evaluate
Set a plan of Take action to
progress and
Establish Goals action for strive towards
revise goals or
achieving goals goals
action plan

References

1
Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Stevens, C. K. (2001). Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit
between members' personal mastery and performance goals matter?. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 86(6), 1083-1095.
2
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for
teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2),
503-530.
3
Colbert, A. E., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Bradley, B. H., & Barrick, M. R. (2008). CEO
transformational leadership: The role of goal importance congruence in top management
teams. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 81-96.

B-20
4
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and
the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of
Management Journal, 41(1), 96-107.
5
Messick, D. M. (2005). On the psychological exchange between leaders and followers. In D. M.
Messick & R. M. Kramer (Eds.). The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and
research, (pp. 81-96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265-268.
7
Matsui, T., Kakuyama, T., & Onglatco, M. U. (1987). Effects of goals and feedback on
performance in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 407-415.
8
Pearson, C. A. L. (1987). Participative goal setting as a strategy for improving performance and
job satisfaction: A longitudinal evaluation with railway track maintenance gangs. Human
Relations, 40(8), 473-488.
9
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of
Psychology, 41(1), 585-634.
10
Latham, G. P. (2003). Goal setting: A five-step approach to behavior change. Organizational
Dynamics, 32(3), 309-318.
11
Gollwitzerr, P. M., (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. I. Higgins & R. M. Sorentino
(Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior, 2, (pp.
53-92). New York: Guilford Press.

B-21
 USING YOUR LEADERSHIP AS A RESOURCE

Guide Questions:
12. What has the company commander or first sergeant identified as working well or needing
improvement within the platoon?

Leader Experiences:

Leaders noted how company commanders and their first sergeants can help get a new platoon
leader and platoon sergeant on the right footing. By communicating expectations and what
works well, or doesn’t work well, within the platoon, they can assist in setting a common
understanding of where the platoon stands. They can also assist in helping PLs and PSGs figure
out what their roles are and manage conflict if it arises.

“…both [the commander and first sergeant] together sitting down with both of
us. There could be some cross-referenced information or talking about
different things. If [we are] in the same room we understand what they are
trying to say. Boss is there you say ‘Roger sir’ [and] actually absorb it. [I]
think it should be done in a group setting.”
-Sergeant First Class, 1 year of experience as a platoon sergeant

“They would help us work together, do our jobs better. Created a lot of
cohesion not just within the troop, but [the] platoon itself.”
-Staff sergeant, 1 year of experience as a platoon sergeant

“We sit down and talk about both of our intent, commander and first
sergeant’s intent, mold them together.”
-Second Lieutenant, 6 months of experience as a platoon leader

Army Doctrine:
• ADP 6.0 (2014). Mission Command.
• TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned Officer Guide. Sections 5.1-5.2.

Helpful Tips:
• Learning from someone with more experience is important to personal and professional
development.
o Learning from more experienced members of the organization (such as mentors)
can result in higher performance and long-term career outcomes1, 2.
• Be proactive about seeking information. Proactive behaviors (especially from
newcomers to the unit) such as information seeking improves individual performance and
satisfaction with the unit2.

B-22
 References
1
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated
with mentoring for protégeé: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–
136.
2
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Chao, G. T., & Bauer, T. N. (2017). Taking stock of two relational
aspects of organizational life: Tracing the history and shaping the future of socialization
and mentoring research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 324-337.

B-23
 APPENDIX C

ARMY DOCTRINE QUICK REFERENCE

C-1
 Army Doctrine Quick Reference

General Sources: Communication:

• ADP 6-22 (2012). Army Leadership. • ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command.
• ADRP 6-22 (2012) Army Leadership. Sections 9, 24, 36-37.
• ATP 3-21.8 2016. Infantry Platoon and • FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development.
Squad. Sections 1-46 to 1-48. Sections 1-8, 3-11, 3-35, 3-22.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development.
• TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned Managing Conflict:
Officer Guide.
• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command.
Role Expectations: Sections 8-37.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development.
• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command. Table 7-13.
Sections 10-12.
• ADP 7-0 (2012). Training Units and Learning from Each Other:
Developing Leaders. Section 24.
• ATP 3-21.8 2016. Infantry Platoon and • ADP 6.0 (2014). Mission Command.
Squad. Sections 1-46 to 1-48. Section 12.
• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. • FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development.
Sections 1-5, 1-21. Section 1-6.
• TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned • TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned
Officer Guide. Sections 4.18, 5.1-5.2, 8.1. Officer Guide. Sections 4.18, 5.1-5.2.

Decision-Making: Support and Empower Each Other:

• ADP 6-0 (2014). Mission Command. • TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned

Sections 36-37. Officer Guide. Sections 3.7, 5.1-5.2, 8.1.

Platoon Vision and Goals: Using Your Leadership as a Resource:

• FM 6-22 (2015). Leader Development. • ADP 6.0 (2014). Mission Command.

Section 1-22, 3-106; Table 1-2. • TC 7-22.7 (2015). Noncommissioned
• TC 7-22.7. (2015). Noncommissioned Officer Guide. Sections 5.1-5.2.
Officer Guide. Section 8.1.

C-2
 APPENDIX D

RESEARCH PRODUCT POCKET FLIP BOOK VERSION PROOFS

D-1
D-2
D-3
D-4
D-5
D-6
D-7
D-8
D-9
D-10
D-11
D-12
D-13
D-14
D-15
D-16
D-17
D-18
D-19
D-20
D-21
D-22
D-23
D-24
D-25
D-26
D-27
D-28
D-29
D-30
D-31
D-32
D-33
 APPENDIX E

RESEARCH PRODUCT TRIFOLD VERSION

E-1
E-2
E-3