Mercy Petition

Mercy Petition
drishtiias.com/printpdf/mercy-petition
Why in News
The Tihar Jail administration had asked the convicts in the Nirbhaya case, 2012 to apply for
mercy petition before the President within seven days. The order has come after all other
legal options have been exhausted by the convicts.
Even if one of the convicts applies for the mercy plea, it becomes applicable to all.
For seeking mercy petition, the death sentence by a sessions (trial) court must be
confirmed by the High Court.
The death sentence convict has an option to appeal to the Supreme Court. If the
Supreme Court either refuses to hear the appeal or upholds the death sentence,
then the convict or his relative can submit a mercy petition to the President of
India (Articles 72) or the Governor of the State (161).
Session Court: District court is referred to as sessions court when it exercises its jurisdiction
on criminal matters under the Code of Criminal procedure (CrPc).
Grounds of Appeal
In his/her mercy petition, the person concerned is required to state the grounds
upon which he/she requests for the grant of pardon.
These grounds may not have any value in the eyes of law for exonerating the accused
person from the offence, but they may play an important role in the release of the
person by the President.
The grounds, such as the convicted person is the only bread earner of the
family or the physical fitness of the convict, his age or even the law was
quite harsh or the court by chance committed any mistake or error
inadvertently, may be taken into consideration at the time of disposal of the
mercy petition.
1/4
Supreme Court in Kehar Singh v Union of India, 1988 case reiterated its stand and
held that the grant of pardon by the President is an act of grace and, therefore, cannot
be claimed as a matter of right.
Need for the Pardoning Power

The philosophy underlying the pardon power is that “every civilized country
recognizes and provides for the pardoning power as an act of grace and humanity in
course of law”.
The pardoning power is founded on the consideration of public good and is to be
exercised on the grounds of public welfare, which is the legitimate objective of all
punishments.
Constitutional Provision
Article 72 provides the pardoning power to the President of India, it says:
The President shall have the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or
remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of
any person convicted of any offence-
in all cases where the punishment or sentence is by a Court-martial;
in all cases where the punishment or sentence for an offence against any
law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union
extends;
in all cases where the sentence is a sentence of death.
Article 161 provides that the Governor of a State shall have the power to grant
pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or
commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence against any law relating
to a matter to which the executive power of the State extends.
In Dhananjoy Chatterjee alias Dhana v State of West Bengal, 1994 case the
Supreme Court has said that “The power under Articles 72 and 161 of the Constitution
can be exercised by the Central and State Governments, not by the President or
Governor on their own”.
The advice of the appropriate Government binds the Head of the state.
Pardon: The president can totally absolve/acquit the person for the offence and let him go
free like a normal citizen.
Commute: To reduce the type of punishment into a less harsh one. For example Rigorous
imprisonment to simple imprisonment.
Remission: To reduce the punishment without changing the nature of the punishment. For
example 20 years rigorous imprisonment to 10 years rigorous imprisonment.
2/4
Reprieve: A delay is allowed in the execution of a sentence, usually a death sentence for a
guilty person to prove his innocence.
Respite: Reduce the degree of punishment looking at specific grounds like pregnancy, old
age etc.
Note: A Court-martial is a trial in a military court of a member of the armed forces who are
charged with breaking military law.
Difference between the pardoning power of President and Governor

Death sentence: President can pardon the death sentence but the Governor has no
power to pardon the death sentence.
Court-martial: The President can pardon in case of Court-martial. But the Governor
cannot pardon in the court-martial.
Jurisdiction: President exercises his judicial powers for the punishment which is given
under the law made by the Union. Whereas the Governor exercises his judicial powers
for the punishment which is given under the law made by the State.
Procedure Involved
A convict under the sentence of death is allowed to file a mercy petition within a
period of seven days after the date on which the Superintendent of Jail informs him
about the dismissal of the appeal or special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court.
The petitions are to be presented to the President of India. The President office seeks
the cabinet advice.
The appeal is examined by the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry
before giving recommendations to the President, takes the view of State
concerned.
There is no written procedure to deal with mercy petition.
Judicial review: President’s pardon/rejection/delay is also subjected to judicial review.
However, if a court finds that the process of the decision taken by the President
under Article 72 was not arbitrary or unreasonable, the decision then cannot be
interfered with.
A curative petition is the last judicial corrective measure which can be pleaded
in any judgment or decision passed by the Supreme Court which is normally
decided by Judges in-chamber.
Curative petition: The concept of the curative petition was first evolved by the Supreme
Court of India in the matter of Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra and Anr. (2002) where
the question was whether an aggrieved person is entitled to any relief against the final
judgement/order of the Supreme Court, after the dismissal of a review petition.
3/4
Article 137: It provides that in the matter of laws and rules made under Article 145, the
Supreme Court has the power to review any judgement pronounced (or order made) by it.
Such a petition needs to be filed within 30 days from the date of judgement or order.
Source: TH
4/4

Mercy Petition

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mercy Petition

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mercy Petition

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mercy Petition

Need for the Pardoning Power

Difference between the pardoning power of President and Governor

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.