0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views

SJVNL Arbitration

The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms for hydropower projects. It outlines several ADR approaches used in the hydropower industry, including dispute adjudication boards, independent engineers, conciliation committees, mediation through independent external monitors, arbitration, and amicable settlements. It also provides details on SJVN's experience resolving disputes through these mechanisms on its 1500 MW Nathpa Jhakri Hydropower Project in India.

Uploaded by

SANJAY
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views

SJVNL Arbitration

The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms for hydropower projects. It outlines several ADR approaches used in the hydropower industry, including dispute adjudication boards, independent engineers, conciliation committees, mediation through independent external monitors, arbitration, and amicable settlements. It also provides details on SJVN's experience resolving disputes through these mechanisms on its 1500 MW Nathpa Jhakri Hydropower Project in India.

Uploaded by

SANJAY
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)

MECHANISMS FOR HYDROPOWER PROJECTS

International Conference on Hydropower and Dams Development


for Water and Energy Security- Under Changing Climate

07.04.2022
Presentation Layout

• Company Profile of SJVN


• Disputes in Hydropower Projects
• ADR Mechanisms
• SJVN’s Experience in NJHEP
• Conclusion
• References

2
Shared
Beginning First Project Portfolio Presence
Vision
• Incorporated in • Commissioned • Projects with • Nine states of
1988 as JV first project, over 16,900 MW India
between GoI and 1500 MW NJHPS capacity • 5000 MW by 2023
GoHP in 2004 • Two
• 25000 MW by 2030
neighbouring
• Category-I, • NJHPS is largest • Eight projects of countries - Nepal
• 50,000MW by 2040
schedule-A mini- hydropower 3300 MW are and Bhutan.
ratna CPSE under station in India under-
MoP construction
Installed Business Recent
Subsidiaries Joint Ventures
Capacity Verticals Developments
• SAPDC -– 900 MW • CPTC - Cross Border • Generation : 2016 • Power Generation - • Five projects of
Arun-3 HEP in Power Transmission MW hydro, thermal, 5097 MW in
Nepal. Company Limited - wind and solar Arunachal Pradesh
26% equity.
• STPL - 1320 MW • Transmission :86 • Power Transmission • Seven Pump storage
Buxar Thermal • KHEL - Kholongchhu km, 400 kV (CPTC- projects (PSPs) of
Power Project in Hydro Energy JV) • Power Trading 9600 MW in
Bihar. Limited, 50% equity Maharashtra
- 600 MW
• SGEL- SJVN Green Kholongchhu HEP in
Energy Limited Bhutan.
Disputes in Hydropower Projects
• Disputes are endemic to construction industry in general and
hydroelectric projects in particular.

• Delays in dispute resolution is major reason for time and cost


overruns.

• Timely resolution of disputes is in best interests of all key


stakeholders – project developers, contractors, funding agencies,
and consumers.

• Key causes of disputes include challenging nature of projects,


owner caused delays and inflated claims by Contractors

5
ADR Mechanisms

1. Dispute Adjudication Board


2. Dispute Avoidance through Independent Engineer
3. Conciliation through Conciliation Committees
4. Mediation through Independent External Monitors
5. Arbitration
6. Amicable settlement

6
Dispute Adjudication Board
• DABs by whatever name they are called - Dispute Boards (DB), Dispute Review Board
(DRB), Dispute Avoidance and Adjudication Board (DAAB) were introduced in India by
World Bank.

• Involve a standing body of one or three independent domain experts, who undertake
regular visits to project sites, adjudicate disputes, when they are referred by one of the
parties.

• DAB is creature of contract; parties establish and empower DAB with jurisdiction to
hear and give the decision on dispute.

• Lately DABs adopt elaborate procedures with little to differentiate DAB proceedings
from Arbitration.

• Submission of Claims by Contractors after completion is major impediment.

7
Dispute Avoidance through Independent Engineer

• In Sept. 2021 MoP notified Dispute Avoidance Mechanism through Independent Engineer for
contracts of hydropower projects being implemented by CPSEs.
• It recognizes that fair and just resolution of disagreements at inception stage is key to
successful performance of contract and prevention of time and cost overruns.
• The stated objectives of engaging 'Independent Engineer' are as follows:
 To reduce the conversion of initial disagreements over issues into full-fledged disputes
 For expeditious elimination of disagreements in a just and fair manner
 To avoid time and cost overruns to ensure timely completion of the Projects
• Selection procedure of IE is a major reform. IE to be selected from panel approved by MoP. In
case of negative feedback, empanelled persons could be dropped from the panel.
• IEs are expected to comply with the timelines prescribed by MoP for site visits and
adjudication process.
• As panel is approved by MoP, neutrality of IEs is now beyond doubt

8
Conciliation through CCIE
• Conciliation exists as recognized form of dispute resolution with a
governing statute in place - The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
which inter alia provides:

 Conciliation involves reference of disputes to Conciliators, which may


number one, two, or three.
 The Conciliator assists parties to reach amicable settlement and may
make proposals for settlement, which need not be in writing and need
not be accompanied by reasons.
 The settlement agreement shall have status and effect of an arbitral
award.
 Parties to Conciliation may withdraw at any stage.

• Conciliation has found widespread recognition after NHAI and MNRE


successfully resolved many disputes through Conciliation Committees.

9
Conciliation through CCIE ... contd.
• Conciliation mechanism through Conciliation Committees of
Independent Experts (CCIE) introduced in December 2021 by MoP.

• Three CCIEs constituted and notified by MoP.

• The contractor can choose to refer dispute to any one of these


CCIEs.

• Envisaged as second tier mechanism after IE mechanism.

• Recourse to Arbitration not available to Parties availing CCIE


mechanism.
10
Mediation through Independent External Monitors

• Advised by Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) in contracts with Integrity


Pact (IP).

• Integrity Pact(IP) adopted to ensure transparency, equity, and


competitiveness in public procurement.

• Under IP Act parties agree to refer differences during pre-award as well as


execution phase to IEMs.

• Mediation through IEMs for public procurement contracts is welcome step


being cost-effective vis-a-vis Arbitration.

• Contracts of hydropower projects already contain pre-arbitral mechanisms


like DAB/Dispute Avoidance with domain experts.

11
Arbitration
• Advantages of Arbitration over other ADR methods :
 Results in binding award with limited grounds for challenge.
 Unlike conciliation and mediation, arbitration proceedings do not
terminate if a party withdraws .

• Disadvantages of Arbitration over other forms of ADR:


 Not cost effective for low-value disputes.
 Unlike mediation and conciliation which ends in win-win situation
arbitration ends in win-lose situation.

12
Arbitration ... contd.
• Following recent amendments in Arbitration Law, arbitral proceedings
now conclude in 1-1.5 years.
• As arbitral proceedings are confidential, Arbitration does not aid in
development of Law.

• Fast Tack Procedure for Arbitration


 Recently MoP issued guidelines regarding Fast Track Procedure for
Arbitration
 Introduced in A&C Act vide the 2015 amendment.
 Involves adjudication by a sole arbitrator, based on only written
pleadings within six months.
 Oral hearings will ordinarily not be held.

13
Amicable settlement

• For settlement of pending issues and eventual closure of


contracts, amicable settlement can be attempted
through a sub-committee of the Board.

• Successfully achieved by SJVN in its 1500 MW Nathpa


Jhakri HEP.

• MoP also advised for constitution of sub-committee of


Board to resolve ongoing disputes expeditiously.

14
SJVN’s Experience in NJHEP
• The major civil works of NJHEP were awarded under four
packages to joint ventures of foreign and Indian construction
companies.

• The project faced insurmountable challenges - poor geological


conditions, hot water conditions, flash floods, labour unrest, etc.
Powerhouse was inundated twice due to floods in river Satluj.

• Contracts had three-tier dispute resolution mechanism.

• Challenge of DRB decisions was an exception rather than a rule.

15
Summary of DRBs’ decisions
Amount awarded
Total claims Decided in favour Decided in favour
Contract as % of claimed Claims referred
referred of Employer of Contractor
amount to Arbitration
1 29 24% 76% 28% 4
2.1 35 23% 77% 20% 3
2.2 45 20% 80% 29% 4
3 34 53% 47% 23% 6

• Awarded amount was in the range of 20 – 29 % of claimed amount.

• Most DRB decisions implemented by parties, with 17 cases referred to Arbitration.

16
Amicable Settlement for Closure of Contract

• Efforts made to resolve all disputes/issues pending before different forums

• Settlements reached in three out of four contracts.

• Settlement could not be reached in one Contract due to Contractor’s


reluctance.

• Sub-committee of Board of Directors, assisted by internal committee


negotiated with Contractors.

• On recommendations of sub-committee, Board approved terms of


settlement.

17
Conclusion
• DABs and Dispute Avoidance with Independent Engineer suited
for inception stage.

• Conciliation and Arbitration suited as second-tier mechanism

• Conciliation has better chances of success vis-a-vis Arbitration as


it leads to a win-win situation.

• Key to success of dispute resolution process is parties faith in the


process.

• Notification of panel of IEs and Conciliation Committees are


welcome moves.

18
Conclusion ... contd.
• Need to consider Litigation history during bid evaluation. Quality-based selection
for procurement of works allowed now.

• In March 2022, MoP issued guidelines for debarment of contractors who


repeatedly raise unjustified/inflated claims and engage in frivolous
litigation/arbitrations

• SJVN’s experience in NJHEP shows adjudication of claims during progress of works


helps avoid disputes.

• Ultimate goal of parties should be expeditious resolution of all pending issues to


enable closure of contracts.

• Parties must share the belief - their interests are best served if resources are
utilized on productive pursuits.

• This belief will enable them to work together towards the common goal of dispute
resolution.

19
THANK YOU

We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we
created them.

- Albert Einstein

20
References
• The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

• MoP’s O.M dated 27.09.2021 on Model Contract Provision for “Dispute Avoidance
Mechanism” through ‘Independent Engineer (IE) in the Construction Contracts of CPSEs
executing Hydropower projects

• MoP’s O.M dated 29.12.2021 on Dispute Resolution through Conciliation for Contractual
Disputes in Projects implemented by CPSUs/Statutory Bodies under the administrative control
of Ministry of Power – Constitution of Conciliation Committee of Independent Experts (CCIE)

• MoP’s O.M dated 16.03.2022 on Guidelines for early settlement of disputes and to minimize
the arbitral claims/disputes in hydropower sector

• CVC circular dated 28.01.2022 on Standard Operating Procedure for implementation of


Integrity Pact

• Department of Expenditure, MoF’s O.M dated 29.10.2021 on General Instructions on


Procurement and Project Management

21

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy