1

The Role of Human Rights Regime in Changing the World

 2

Contents

Introduction................................................................................................................................2

Historical Context of Human Rights Regime............................................................................2

A. Emergence of International Human Rights Declarations..................................................3

B. Evolution of Human Rights Instruments and Treaties.......................................................3

C. Milestones in the Development of Human Rights Regime...............................................4

Universal Standards and Legal Framework...........................................................................4

Advocacy, Awareness, and Mobilization................................................................................5

International Cooperation and Collaboration in Human Rights:............................................7

Contributions to Peace and Stability through Human Rights Regime...................................8

Empowerment of Individuals through the Human Rights Regime:.....................................10

Accountability and Justice Mechanisms...............................................................................11

Conclusion................................................................................................................................12

References................................................................................................................................13
 3

Introduction

The concept of human rights as a system outlining the essential freedoms of every

human has formed an essential foundation for establishing the existing international order.

The international human rights declarations, associated with developing treaties and

institutions, have also built a universal regime to safeguard human dignity. In this respect, the

essay will explore the role played by the human rights regime in instigating global

transformation. This essay presents a historical perspective allowing for tracing the evolution

of the human rights instruments and significant milestones that have marked this progress. In

getting into the finer details of this regime, the analysis will explore universal standards, legal

outlines, and mechanisms for accountability provision. In addition, the essay will reflect on

advocacy, awareness, and international cooperation as some factors that raise human rights

issues. Following the scrutiny of an institutional structure and an investigation of various

cases, this essay will endeavor to underscore some of the contributions of the human rights

regime in peace-building initiatives, stability, and empowerment. As we grapple with the

intricacies that human rights discourse poses, this essay will explore the multi-dimensional

layers of the core role played by the regime of human rights in the formation and

transformation of the global landscape.

Historical Context of Human Rights Regime

To understand better what role is being played by the human rights regime in defining the

different aspects of the global scenery today, reviewing its history is necessary. Development

of international declarations of human rights represents a radical shift in the center of

attention from traditional concern about state sovereignty towards an international matrix

securing and ensuring the entitlement of each person.

Emergence of International Human Rights Declarations

 4

The issue of the human rights regime can be traced back to the consequences of WWII.

WWII witnessed horrors that have been linked to the Holocaust and the widescale atrocities

that were committed during the war, which called for an immediate collective commitment to

make sure these would never be repeated, as they represented severe violations of human

dignity. The ‘United Nations’ (UN) founded in 1945, and the Charter undertook to promote

and encourage respect for human rights. The ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’

(UDHR), adopted by the ‘UN General Assembly’ in 1948, has been a landmark international

human rights declaration (Duan, 2017). Drafted with active participation by representatives

of diverse cultural and legal traditions, the UDHR's reflection of global consensus on ground

norms of fundamental rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled takes

prominence. It consequently crystallized the point that rights are not contingent on

nationality, ethnicity, or any other factor of discrimination among people.

Evolution of Human Rights Instruments and Treaties

After the adoption of the UDHR, the realization of the need for more binding mechanisms

that assured the reinforcement of human rights principles began to grow. This provided the

basis for forming international conventions and treaties that tried to arrange and place human

rights obligations for states. Leading examples are the ‘International Covenant on Civil and

Political Rights (ICCPR)’ as well as the ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social, and

Cultural Rights (ICESCR)’, adopted in 1966 (Pinto, 2022). The landmark is the declaration of

purposes to clear legal obligations in human rights instruments. These treaties created an

avenue through which states would be responsible for observing human rights standards. The

appearance of limbs of review like the ‘Human Rights Committee and the Committee on

Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights’ further imbibed the accountability mechanisms in the

human rights regime.

Milestones in the Development of Human Rights Regime

 5

Positives and challenges have characterized the breakthrough in human rights

development. The 1993 ‘Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action’ was a remarkable

milestone since it re-emphasized human rights' universality, indivisibility, and

interdependence. It emphasized addressing economic, social, and cultural rights on par with

civil and political rights. Another stage was represented in 1998 by the Rome Statute

establishing the ‘International Criminal Court (ICC)’ as a mechanism of persons' prosecution

for serious international crimes (Babaian, S., 2018). Significantly, with the setting up of the

ICC, there was a shift towards individual responsibility and raised concern that justice needs

to be provided to the victims of rights violations.

In the end, the path of historical contexts of the human rights regime reveals that there

is still an imperative not to let a repeat of the atrocities witnessed during World War II. In

some sense, this evolutionary process of going from declarations to instruments legally

entrenched amounts to a collective commitment to the rights and dignity of individuals

worldwide. Some milestones of the UDHR, such as the development of treaties and the

framework for accountability, have also contributed to making the human rights regime

resilient and adaptive to changes in global dynamics.

Universal Standards and Legal Framework

The Universal Standards and Legal Framework constitute significant foundations of

the human rights regime that led the world to transform. Treaties such as the ‘Universal

Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)’, the ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political

Rights (ICCPR)’, and the ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights

(ICESCR)’ are frameworks laying out principles affecting human rights in a particular way

on a global scale. Such treaties are the basis for reaching a common ground concerning

human rights in different cultures and countries. By establishing rights to life, liberty,

security, and social, economic, and cultural rights, this language even binds people and helps
 6

gain leverage over global human rights worries (Ikawa, 2020). States that have ratified these

treaties commit to upholding these standards within their nation and, in doing so, to

furthering the realization of such rights internationally. The human rights regime thus creates

these universal standards, which contribute to the shared vision of all humankind's inherent

dignity and rights.

Indeed, these standards are a measure by which the conduct of nations is measured

and, in turn, promote accountability and further the culture of respect for human rights.

Universal standards offer an opportunity to assess and address the ever-ballooning challenges

facing the globe today (Sangiovanni, 2017). Be it in uncovering discrimination, attaining

gender equality, or guarding the right to freedom of speech, making use of universal

standards is deemed more appreciative of the implications encompassed in human rights.

This makes it possible for the international community to cooperate in solving systemic

problems and act together to cause positive transformation.

The human rights regime provides a substantive legal framework that ensures

accountability and conformity to accepted standards. In this context, making laws includes

provisions for structures in the form of mechanisms working towards various ends, such as

real-time monitoring, reporting, and investigating any allegations arising from a violation.

International institutions such as the ‘United Nations Human Rights Council’ and specific

committees perform an essential function of control over observing the given commitments

and holding states under account (Pribytkova, 2021). Moreover, there is an extension of the

legal framework to putting up international courts like the ‘International Criminal Court

(ICC)’ that adjudicate cases that relate to genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

The existence of such institutions marks devotion to justice and works as a discouragement

against gross human rights abuses.

 7

Advocacy, Awareness, and Mobilization

Advocacy, awareness, and mobilization remain essential and integral parts of the role

of the human rights regime in influencing the effects of global change. Non-governmental

organizations (NGOs) are principal actors in raising the human rights agenda, contributing to

increased world awareness, and enhancing the mobilization for positive change. NGOs

translate the human rights regime's principles into activities on the ground, hence vital in

governance (McGaughey, 2018). These organizations work outside the government's control,

acting like watchdogs, echoing states' responsibility for violating human rights. In their work,

NGOs monitor, report, and challenge abuses. For instance, Amnesty International and Human

Rights Watch have been involved in human rights abuse documentation worldwide.

Additionally, NGOs have a role in narrowing the gap between international human rights

standards and local communities. They act as intermediaries so that the daily experiences of

locals are linked to the principles stipulated in the treaties. Only with direct support, legal aid,

and advocacy at a grassroots level can NGOs enable people to assert their rights. Such

realities of differing cultural and political circumstances can only be confronted from the

bottom up regarding yielding sustainable change.

Human rights advocacy is integral to elevating global awareness to new heights that

encourage empathy and invoke international support. Various platforms, such as social

media, documentaries, and demonstrations, are used to draw attention to the violation of

human rights and the production of human rights discourses (Budabin and Pruce, 2018). This

humanizes the experiences influenced by the power of storytelling to make them issues that a

wider audience can identify with. Further, advocacy for human rights has only served to

continue catalyzing policy changes at national and international levels. In this way, the NGOs

shine a light on systemic injustices and help sharpen public opinion to pressure governments

to align their policies with the principles of human rights effectively. On a similar note, the
 8

more extensive visibility of these issues related to human rights pressures all corporations to

maintain ethical standards to have an impact on a larger culture of accountability.

Analyzing successful advocacy campaigns gives concrete evidence of how the regime

of human rights has contributed to global change. An excellent example of such successful

advocacy is the worldwide movement against apartheid in South Africa. NGOs, activists, and

governments mobilized global public opinion, leading to economic sanctions and diplomatic

isolation of the regime. This unity effort led to dismantling apartheid, with a more inclusive

and just political system put in place. The ‘#MeToo’ movement is another clear-cut example

of grassroots mobilization that was equally advocated by NGOs and single individuals

pushing for the rights of survivors of sexual harassment and abuse (Gen, 2021). The

movement went beyond national boundaries to be an international discourse based on gender

assault, which helped build awareness of the systemic condition. As such, policy adjustments,

legal reforms, and changes in public attitudes regarding sexual harassment were recorded.

International Cooperation and Collaboration in Human Rights:

The degree of international cooperation and collaboration among the nations has a

more central linkage to role human rights regime in changing the world. While the way

toward global cooperation contains challenges and limitations, examples of such cooperation

illustrate the transformational power that joint efforts can harness. An example of practical

positive cooperation in human rights at the international level is the adoption of the

‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)’ in 1948. Elaborated after the Second

World War, UDHR represents proof of the joint position of states on guaranteeing and

safeguarding the fundamental human rights of individuals (Duan, 2017). Further evidence of

such effective collaboration in the classification and promotion of human rights standards is

reflected in the subsequent evolution of various international treaties for example, the
 9

‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)’ and the ‘International

Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)’.

Another example is the collective response to apartheid in South Africa. The

international community, through collective efforts like the anti-apartheid movement and the

imposition of sanctions, was very influential in forcing a hand on the South African

government towards the abolition of its policies that were ethnically based and

discriminatory. It showed that cohesive international action against gross human rights

violations could induce significant changes in the social and political landscape.

However, as much as some progress has been made, the world is far from achieving

seamless global collaboration on human rights because of several factors. One of the issues is

national sovereignty, whereby most countries account for national citizens before they can be

accountable to any international institution. Applying different human rights can result in

selective enforcement because of power dynamics, economic interests with other states, and

geopolitical considerations. Cultural relativism is a challenge that may be experienced where

cultural differences exist in the perceptions of various human rights, making it difficult to

have a general agreement. In both cases, the state's emphasis on sovereignty above human

rights norms will likely undermine efficiency in international cooperation. Moreover, there

are voids within which some nations can circumvent accountability for human rights abuses

because there is no global issuance mechanism.

Strategic approaches are essential to increasing international collaboration on human

rights. First, enhancing the entities and mechanisms of global institutions like the ‘United

Nations Human Rights Council’ will increase their ability to monitor and redress activities

related to human rights violations (Carraro, 2019). A more inclusive approach involving civil

society and non-governmental organizations will bring a broader spectrum of voices and

perspectives that should foster a collective sense of responsibility. Promoting dialogue and
 10

diplomacy as the primary means of conflict resolution is essential. This would only be

achieved through open discussion and not punitive measures that would keep nations actively

involved in international efforts, minus the fear of facing the prospect of being punished.

Besides, creating chances for economic benefits in compliance with human rights standards

may make states consider individual treatment an integral part of their policies.

Contributions to Peace and Stability through Human Rights Regime

At the heart of worldwide endeavors to develop a just and lasting world lies the

interplay between human rights and peace. With all its treaties and agreements, the

international human rights regime is integral to shaping the building blocks of peace.

Recognition of individuals' dignity, equality, and freedom translates to harmonious

cohabitation (Bell, 2017). Respect for human rights is emotionally binding and influential in

preventing conflict and establishing peaceful relationships. Countries prioritizing human

rights have become more disposed to diplomatic solutions, which create international

relations based on cooperation instead of confrontation. Regarding this, playing up conflicts

in different world hotspots becomes easy. Instead, the grievances that characterize societies

hurt by systemic human rights abuses often end up caught in cycles of violence, as grievances

then fuel resentment and resistance.

On the other hand, nations compliant with human rights experience fewer occurrences

of internal turmoil and are more likely to meet their societal challenges through consultation

and participation. Many examples show the extent of the transformation brought about by

human rights in societies, making them peaceful and stable. The template from which much

inspiration can be drawn is the transition in South Africa from the apartheid era to that of a

democratic dispensation founded on reconciliation and human rights (Naidoo and Naidoo,

2021). It did not end the dark chapter. Instead, it laid a foundation for a more collective and

inclusive nation by dismantling institutionalized discrimination. Similarly, experiences of

 11

post-conflict nations like Rwanda underscore the rights rights' pivotal rebuilding shattered

societies. Conversely, the encouragement of obtaining justice and explanation regarding the

genocide through the ‘International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda’ facilitated the restoration

of the social order to attain a lasting peace.

While the human rights regime offers a promising path to peace, various challenges

could affect its effectiveness. A big challenge rests in resistance by governments to embrace

human rights principles, viewing them as external impositions undermining their sovereignty

(Rodríguez-Garavito and Gomez, 2018). This may hamper the willingness or ability of a

government to provide its citizens with human rights, including refraining from engaging in

acts that sustain conflicts in the country. In addition, genuinely sustainable peace, anchored in

human rights approaches, requires the international community to address violations at their

worst sources: poverty, inequality, and discrimination, for example. These pervasive and

interconnected problems require long-term and systemic solutions, and too frequently, they

strain the world's capacity to bring about actual change.

Empowerment of Individuals through the Human Rights Regime:

Individual empowerment is at the fundamental of the human rights regime and serves

as a transformational force. This empowerment based on recognizing individual dignity and

worth to alter the situation is fueled by grassroots movements' international human rights

principles. When the human rights regime starts making individuals agents of the change on

which it is premised, then positive changes within the society will take dominance and signal

the reality of the system's significance in shaping a just and equitable environment. Respect

for individual dignity and worth as inherent and inalienable is a fundamental principle of the

human rights regime (Vandenhole and Gready, 2018). Human rights instruments from the

‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ voice intrinsic value. The regime states that human

beings have an innate and inalienable dignity regardless of background, ethnicity, or status.
 12

This acknowledgment offers the foundation from which empowerment builds by being given

respect and justice through equality to every individual.

It is one of the primary mechanisms for the regime of human rights to impact

grassroots empowerment by provoking social change. The regime provides a normative

framework within which individuals are motivated to demand social justice by championing

people's agency. The ‘Arab Spring’ represents a prototypical example whereby, furnished

with the international law of human rights and instruments, individuals throughout the

Middle East commenced mobilizing for political change (Rasovic-Noruzi, 2022). The

freedom of expression, and association led by the regime became a source of attention for

people striving to mark their paths in life. The elements that arise from individual

empowerment led to social development, as seen in various circumstances across the globe.

When individuals are empowered to assert their rights, it fosters a culture of accountability

and justice. For instance, South Africa observed a new regime rise upon which apartheid was

dismantled through the rise of individual empowerment toward preaching equality and, thus,

the need to end racial discrimination (Zakharov et al., 2023). For example, the Truth and

Reconciliation Commission initiatives illustrate how people can bring transformational

processes when supported by the human rights regime.

Finally, individual empowerment has consequences on social cohesion and stability.

This is important as studies indicate that societies that empower their people to engage in

decision-making and enable them to air their views are more often resilient and peaceful. In

cultivating such empowerment, the human rights regime acts as a catalytic converter for

building societies whose primary focus is dialogue, inclusivity, and the means through which

conflicts can be resolved peacefully.

Accountability and Justice Mechanisms

 13

International human rights organizations are portrayed as the international level of

human rights commitments to justice. They define collective affirmative measures towards

addressing violations of human rights issues and guarantee mechanisms of accountability by

parties. This is against a structured framework underpinning a common understanding of the

universal imperative in protecting human rights. At the center of the justice-seeking capital

and the interplay with human rights is the ‘International Criminal Court (ICC)’. The ICC is a

desired step in the ladder of individual accountability for some of the most heinous crimes.

As Tsilonis and Tsanta (2019) add, its jurisdiction also includes a scope of genocide, war

crimes, as well as crimes against humanity. Whereas the ICC symbolizes a commitment to

ending impunity, it further shows that the global justice mechanisms can be extraordinary

beyond national boundaries. Significant challenges facing ICC are non-participation by big

powers, hence shrinking its scope and impact.

From looking at particular cases, it is evident that accountability and justice

mechanisms are a massive avenue towards change in the world through the human rights

regime. Under such conditions, in this ‘International Criminal Tribunal’, the opportunity was

fixed to bring to account persons on war crimes that were committed, for example, in the

former Yugoslavia and the Rwandan genocide. The trials were not perfect, but whatever little

was achieved reminded me of the need for a united face against such severe atrocities and

rectification of them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the human rights regime has found several issues of importance in the

change in the world. Firstly, the historical development of international declarations and

treaties concerning human rights has set up grounds for a global framework that universally

shelters and promotes fundamental rights. Establishing such universal standards and

providing the legal framework actualized ways of holding nations into account regarding
 14

their commitments to respect human rights, thus giving opportunity and making this aspect a

shared responsibility on the global stage. Upon reflection, the significance of the human

rights regime remained relevant and passed above the consideration of a legal obligation by

many. Above all other observations, the scope for change was predicted by the regime

because it applied a culture characterized by accountability, justice, and empowerment. It has

greatly influenced society's fights against discrimination that could make the world a better,

just, and fair place.

Despite some progress, calling upon the continuous effort to promote human rights

globally remains mandatory. The challenges persist, from noncompliance to cultural barriers

that obstruct the full-fledged realization of human rights. With experiences of achievements

and failures, it is essential to note that the road to a world where human rights will be

universally upheld still needs to be done. Governments, civil society organizations, and

individuals should continue collaborating, advocating, and implementing policies to

strengthen the global human rights regime. This call to action will involve strengthening

international cooperation, changing systemic aspects, and giving more power to people at the

community level. Promoting human rights is not one to be seen as achieved by its static

nature but a process that requires sustained commitment and moves beyond preaching.

Recognizing its significance in aiding the human rights regime and helping to strengthen it is

a responsibility of a world order that respects and protects every individual as possessing

inherent dignity, which includes all persons.

 15

References

Ancietos, M., 2021. Political opportunism, impunity and the perpetuation of Victors Justice:

A case of the Rwandan Genocide. African Journal of Political Science and

International Relations, 15(2), pp.76-89.

Babaian, S., 2018. The International Criminal Court–An International Criminal World

Court?: Jurisdiction and Cooperation Mechanisms of the Rome Statute and its

Practical Implementation. Springer.

Bell, C., 2017. Peace settlements and human rights: A post-Cold War circular history. Journal

of Human Rights Practice, 9(3), pp.358-378.

Budabin, A.C. and Pruce, J.R., 2018. The elite politics of media advocacy in human

rights. New Political Science, 40(4), pp.744-762.

Carraro, V., 2019. Promoting compliance with human rights: the performance of the United

Nations’ Universal Periodic Review and Treaty Bodies. International Studies

Quarterly, 63(4), pp.1079-1093.

Duan, F., 2017. The universal declaration of human rights and the modern history of human

rights. Available at SSRN 3066882.

Duan, F., 2017. The universal declaration of human rights and the modern history of human

rights. Available at SSRN 3066882.

Erameh, N.I., 2017. Humanitarian intervention, Syria and the politics of human rights

protection. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(5), pp.517-530.

Gen, B.M., 2021. In the Shadow of the Carceral State: The Evolution of Feminist and

Institutional Activism Against Sexual Violence.

Ikawa, D., 2020. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and

the Optional Protocol. In Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights

as human rights (pp. 14-26). Edward Elgar Publishing.

 16

McGaughey, F., 2018. From gatekeepers to GONGOs: A taxonomy of Non-Governmental

Organisations engaging with United Nations human rights mechanisms. Netherlands

Quarterly of Human Rights, 36(2), pp.111-132.

Naidoo, M.K. and Naidoo, G.M., 2021. The erosion of Human Dignity in the New South

Africa.

Pinto, M., 2022. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. United

Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, disponível em https://legal. un.

org/avl/pdf/ha/icescr/icescr_e. pdf, acesso em, 11(01).

Pribytkova, E., 2021. Extraterritorial obligations in the United Nations system: UN treaty

bodies. In The Routledge Handbook on Extraterritorial Human Rights

Obligations (pp. 95-109). Routledge.

Rasovic-Noruzi, Z., 2022. Human rights law in Tunisia in the post-Arab Spring era (Doctoral

dissertation, Middlesex University).

Rodríguez-Garavito, C. and Gomez, K., 2018. Responding to the populist challenge: a new

playbook for the human rights field. Rising to the populist challenge: a new playbook

for the human rights actors, 1, pp.11-53.

Sangiovanni, A., 2017. Humanity without dignity: Moral equality, respect, and human rights.

Harvard University Press.

Tsilonis, V. and Tsanta, A., 2019. The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

Springer International Publishing.

Vandenhole, W. and Gready, P., 2018. Failures and successes of human rights-based

approaches to development: towards a change perspective. In Human Rights-Based

Change (pp. 15-54). Routledge.

Zakharov, N., Tate, S.A., Law, I. and Bernardino-Costa, J., 2023. South Africa and the

Struggle for Racial Equality: Debating Deracialization, Non-racialism,

 17

Decolonization, and Africanization. In Futures of Anti-Racism: Paradoxes of

Deracialization in Brazil, South Africa, Sweden, and the UK (pp. 15-67). Cham:

Springer International Publishing.