The Story of Ancient Egypt Author George Rawlinson

3 1162 04538901 3
THE STORY OF TIE NATIONS

vou 9 arte, ci Tor. $8.98
TTHUE STORY
STORY OFOF GREECE.
ROME. iy RyAurion Prof. Grae
Jas A. Harmon
THE STORY OF THE JEWS, By Prof, Jas K. Homwn
THE STORY
STORY OFOF CHALDEA,
GERMANY, fylyS, ZABssinc-Goven
. Racane
THE
THe STORY OF NORWAY. Ry Prof HH, Rovesex
TIE STORY OF SPAIN. By EE. andSioa Have
THE STORY OF HUNGARY. Ry Prot.A. Viscene
THE THE STORY OF CARTHAGE,
CTORY OF THE SARACENS,.By Prot.hy Avturn Aurnro J Gasay
Cuuncn
THE STORY OF THE NOORSIN SPAIN, ByStasuey Lose
‘THE
Tilk STORY
STORY OFOF THE PERSIA. NORMANS.
Hy'S. G. W.hy Svtan
BangaO, rvs
THE THE STORY
STORY OFOF ALEXANDER’S
ASSYRIA. Ily ZA,EMPIRE, Racor By Prot). P. Mawarry
TIE STORY OF IRELAND. By Hos, Hanis Lawtase
THE STORY OF TURKEY. ly Sranter Laxs-Pooux
‘THE
THE STORYSTORYOFOF MEDLAVAL
MEDIA, BABYLON, FRANCE.ANDly PERSIA, ByZ. A. Racor
Gosrare Mason
THE STORY OF MEXICO, hy Snax lata
THE STORY
STORY OFOF PHGNICIA.
HOLLAND. ‘iyBy Joss
TUE GroxceE. Twosoto
RawusaonRoos
THE STORY OF THE HANSA TOWNS. fy Hots Zann
‘THE
THE STORY
STORY OFOF THE EARLYBARIARY
BRITAIN, CORSAIRS,By Prot, Atrano J. Cnumcn
Ry Sravexy Lane-Poots
THE STORY OF RUSSIA. Ry WR, Soni
AME STORY OFOF THE JEWS UNDER
THE STORY SCOTLAND. By Jons ROME,
MacateroseRy W. D, Mosssox
‘THE STORY OF SWITZERLAND. lyR. Sera and Mes, A. Hos
THE STORY
STORY OFOF THE PORTUGAL, Ry 1, EMPIRE,
Mone Srarnens
‘THE HYZANTINE By C, W., Onas
THE STORY OF SICILY. “Ty EA. Fennax
THE STORY
STORY OFOF THE
TUE POLAND.TUSCANBy W.REPUBLICS,
R, Moera, y Bruin Dorey
THE STORY OF PARTHIA, Ty Groton Rawaon
THE STORY OF JAPAN. iy Davo Mouaar
THE
THE STORY
STORY OFOF THE CHRISTIAN lyRECOVERY OF SPAIN, fy 1. Warrs
AUSTRALASIA, Geevicin Tercaxrnen
THE
‘THE STORY
STORY OFOF SOUTHERN
VENICE, Ry AFRICA. hy Gro. M. Tuna
Auernes Wire
THE STORY OF THE CRUSADES, ly 7, S.Axcutn and C.L. Knesrono
TTHE STORY OFOF VEDIC
HOHEMIA.INDIA.By C.y'Z.8. Maonice
A. Recoum
HE STORY
TUE STORY OF CANADA. By 6. tovsmor
‘THE
‘THE STORY
STORY OFOF THE BRITISH RULE INiy Wassnu INDIA. ByMiceR. W esses
BALKANS,
For prospect ofthe series see end of his volume
P, PUTNAM'S SONS, NEW YORK AND LONDON
Attention Scanner:
Foldout in Book!
TP Siow oe Yoon
THE STORY OF
FUNG @iGE) NGI Gaver
RAWLINSON,
ARTHUR GILMAN, WA.
NEW YORK
Corvaicitr
By G. P Porway's Sows
1887
Eatoredat Statonr® Halt Landos
Fy T, Fisnex Uswit
©
REGINALD STUART POOLE,
CONTENTS,
iveGheolor Eoren | fate e yo

Chief divisions + twofold
av 3—The Egypt of the maps
nunreal, 4—Ezypt, the river,” in awhat sens,
§, 6 —The Fayou,7 pian speculations concerning the
Nile, 7, 8—The Nile not beatifal, S—Size of Egypt, 9 Fer=
tility, 10—Geographical situation, 1 , 12—The Nile, a5 a
means of communication, 12, 13~Phenomena of the imunda
spp 14 Geology, 15—Flora and
tony, 19--Exceptions, 20-22
u,
Propue or ever.» 4 5 + 2
OW a of the Egyptians Phenomena of their language
and type, 24—Two marked varieties of physique, 25
types of character: the melancholic, 25, 272 he gay 27
Character of the Egyptian religion + polytheism,
Animal worship, 31-33—Worship of ‘the monarch, 3
Osirid saga, 34 35—Evil gos, 36-—Local cults, 37 Esoteric
religion, 38of alfe
how alter
reconciled
death, with40, 41—Morl
the popularcle,belief,4-43
39—
Conviction
‘Actual state of morals, 45—Ranks of society, 44, 45+
x conrents.
mm.
‘Tue Daw or Hisrory. . 0. 0. st
Early Egyptian myths: the Seb and Thoth lege
The destruction of mankind by Ra, 48—Traditions concer
Dhiba at Memphis, 50, 5t—Names of Memphis, §1—Que
ofthe existence of Mina, $2, 53—Supposed suecesions of M'na,
§54—First historical Egyptian, Snefers, §5—The Egypt of his
time, 6—Hicroglyphies, 57—Tombn, §8-Incipient_ py
‘ids, 50, 60—Socal condition of the people, 6o-—Manners
61—Poniton of women, 62-64
wv.
e Pyratp Berepens
Dita to rete the eanespion of a
Eaypia idea of one, 66—Number of pyramids in Egypt
al Ts 6 Daerndn he TH
of the “Secon! Pyramid,” 72; of the
The adional builder Khuta,
hata, and Menara, S2 the pyramids their tombs, 82—
Grandeur of Khufu’ conception, 83—Cruelty isolved in
‘84, 85-—The builders’ hopes not realized, $5, $6—Still dis
played in the constriction, 86—Magniticenee of the archi
tectural effect, 89 —Inferorty of the **Thied Pyramid,” 90
=Contnwance of the pyramid period, 91-04.
v.
‘Tue Rise oF Tuenes To Power, aNp THE Earty
Ta paw KINGS 7. © 6) =e) Uneli@tusaumal
Shift of the seat of pomer—site of Thebes, 9§—Origin of the
1eof Thebes, 96-—Eaticat known Theban king, Ant I
o7—His successors, Menturhotep I. and s*Antef the Great
(98-Other Antefs and Mentu-hoteps, 08, 99-—Sankh-ka-ra and
his eet, 99, 100—Dynasty of Usurasens and. Amenembats:
conTENTS, xi
spirit of thir civilization, 100, 1o1—Reiga of Amenemhat
To2—His wars and hunting expeditions, 103, 104—Usurtasen
Le his wars, 105—His sculptures and architectural works,
06-—His obclsk, 107-109 Reign of Amenemhat I, + tablet
Delonging to his time, 109, 110—Usurtasen IL. and his con-
quests, 1 4, 112
VL
‘Tue Goop Amesesuar axp is Works. 113-123
Dangers connected with the inundation of the Nile twofold
113—An excessive inundation, 114; a defective one, 115—
Saiferings rom these causes nvr Amen
Powible storage of water, 117—Amen
\ Lake Moers,” 118 Doubts as tots dimensions, 19, 120—
Amenembat’s * Labyrinth,” 121—His pyramid, and name of
Ramat, 123, 125.
vn,
Apeautant 1s Bi Pr Mae Pedi ay 2403
Wanderingsof the riach, 124 —Nevesity which drove him
Into Bgypt, 125 Passage ‘of the Desert, 126—A dread.
‘nfithally met, 127
of Sarah to the court, 128--Abraham's material well-being,
29 —The Pharaoh restores Sarah, 130—Probable date of the
ants 13H.
vi.
‘Tue Grear Invasion —THe Hyksos on Suep.
exp Kinos—Josera axp Avr = 132-146
Exemption of Egypt hitherto from foreign attack, 132—
‘Threatening movements among the populations of Ass
Manetho's fen invasion, 134-—The probe
135, 136—Upper Egypt not overrun, 137—The
CONTENTS.
first Hyksos hing, Set, oF Saites, 138 the rule,”
Aloubeal, 139~Characterof the rule improves with time, 140
—Apepis great works at Tanis, 144—Apepi and Rasekenen,
145—Apepi and Jooeph, 146
1X,
How Te HyKsos were EXpetuep From Raver 147-169
Rapid deterioration of conquering races generally, 147, 148—
Recovery of the Egyptians frm the il effets of the invasion,
149—Second rise of Thebesto greatness, 150 —War of Apepi
with Rasekenen TIL, 151—Succession of Aahines; war
continues, 152—The Hiyksos quit Eaynt, 153-—Aahmes perhaps
ansisted by the Ethiopians, 154-157.
Tue First Great Warrior Kino, THornmes I. 158-169

ly wars of Thothimes in
is dlsie to avenge the
Western Asia at this per 163—Geographical sketch
of the comnties 10 be a 164, 165- Prebble informs
tion of Thothmes on these matters, 167—His great expel
tion into. Syrin and Mesopotamia, 167—His buildings, 165—
His greames inticiently appreciatel, 169.
XL
QUEEN Harasu ano ner Mencuant Freer, 170-188
High ex Egypt, 170- sy postion of
otast a joint role with Thothmes Uy 173-Het buildings
at this period, 173—Her assumption of male ati and ties,
174-17 nominal regency for Thothines TH. and real
sovereignty, 177, 178—-Constraction and voyage of her Ree
178-183 Ketumn of the expedition to Thebes, 184—Construe-
tion of a temple to. com
Hatasu with Thothmes Her obdiks,
‘obliterated by Thothmes, 18
conrENTs. xiii
a ree
lores THE 1 IRD AND. Ast HOTER THE
SecoxD. 189-207
int expedition of Thothmes III. into Asia, 189-101—Hs
expedition
re with an elephant,
19)—Further expeditions: amount of plunder and
terest in natural tory, 196-—Employment of a navy,
‘of victory |
198-199--Architectiral works, 199-201
sion, 202—Thothmes compated with Alexanler, 203—
Descriptor of his person, 204-—Fosition ofthe Istaeites under
‘Thothmes IIL, 205—Short reign of Amenbotep il, 206,
xm,
Awex-norer TI. axp mts Great Works—'
Vocat, Mratxox’ +. 208-222
‘The “Twin Colosi” of Thches: their impressiveness, 208
|The account given of then by their sculptor, 212—Th
astern Colossi, hy called * The Vocal Memon, au
Earls testimony to its being 214— Rational ac
‘count of the phenomenon, -217-—Amenl tem at
Lasor, 217, 218 His other buildings, 319—oHtiesp’swars anplde exe
Peiltons, 219, 220—His lion hunts; his physiognomy and
character, 221, 222
NIV.
Knvenaren axp THe Disk-Worsi ERS. 223-230
Obscure nature of the heresy of the Disk-worshippers,225-
225—Powible connection of Disk-worship with the Israelites,
226—Hostilty ofthe Disk-worshippers to the old Egypti
religion, 227-—The introduction of the “heresy” traced to
Queen Tain, 228—Great development of the “heresy” oner
her son, Amenhotep IV., of Khiuenaten, 229~Other changes
Introduced by him, 230.
xiv conreENTS.
xv.
Broiwxinc or THe Decie or Eoyer . «231
Advance of the Hit ite power in Syria, 231—War of Saplal
swith Ramesses I., 231-—Warof Seti I with Mautenar, 232—
eat Syrian campaign of Set, followed by a treayy 233-235
Sets other wats, 236—His great wall, 237—Hintite war
of Ramesses IL, 238-240—Poem of Pentaose, 241 Rests
of the battle of Kadesh, new treaty and an inter marrage
242, 243 Miltary decline of Egypt, 244—Egyptian art reaches
i highest point: Great Hall of Columnsat Karnak, 245—
‘Tomb of Seti, 246, 247-—Colossi of Ramesses Il, 248—
Rameses I, the great oppressor of the Tsraclites, 249—
Physiognomies of Seti I. and Ramesses IL, 250-252.
XV
Mexeriruan L, THe PuaKson oF Tue Exopus 253- 268
Got prospect of peace on Menephthah’s accesion, 255—
General sketch of his reign, 254—Invasion ofthe Maxyes, 255
Repuleoftheinvasion,
262-264—Loss of the Fgyp
tian eiatot force in the Ked Sea, 265— Internal revolts a
Aificlties, 265—General review of the civilization of the
Peto, 266-268,
XVI.
Tue Decuixe or Ecyrr UNDER THE LATER
Ramesses 68 es 2600 287
‘Temporary disintegration of Egypt, 260-—Reign of Setnekht,
270—Reign of Ramesses I, 271 —General restlessness of
the nations in his time, 272-—Libyan invasion of B 2734
274-Greatinvasion ofthe Tekars, Tanauna, and others 275,
276—Fint naval battle on record, 277, 278 Part taken by
Ramesses in the fight, 278-281 —Campaignof revenge, 282—
Later years of Ramesses peaceful, 283—General decline of
Egypt, 284—Imsignicance of thelater Ramesides, 284, 285—
‘Deterioration ina, literature, and morals, 285-287
CONTENTS. xv
xvi,
‘Tue Prrost-Kincs—Pin pM AND SoLoMoN . 288-297
Influence of the priests in Egypt, 288—Ondinary relations
between them andthe kings, 289—High-priesthood of Ammon
Uiecomes herelitary; Herlor, 200—Rel
“Reign of Men-khepess, 204—Kise of the ki
sracites, 295—Frienlly relations established between Pine
tem I ant Solonion, 296—Effect on Hebrew art and archi-
tecture, 297.
XIX.
SuIsHAK AND HIS DyNasty 9... 298
Shishal’s family Semitic, but not Assyrian or Babylonian, 298
—Connectel by marriage with the priest-kings, 299, 300-Re-
ception of Jeroboam by Shishak, 301—Shishak’s expedition
against Rehoboam, 302—Aid lent to. Jeroboam in his own
Kingdom, 303—Arab conquests, 305—Kamak insertion
305 -Shishak’s successors, 306-—War of Zerah (Osorkon I. 2)
With Asa, 308 Erect of Zerah’s defeat, 309—Decline of the
Disintegration of Egypt, 310, 3t#—Further
literature and art, 311-313
XX.
‘Tue Laxp Suanowixc wirn Wixes—Eover
UNDER TH Eruioriaxs . «314-330
Vague use of the term Ethiopia, 314—Ethiopian kingtom of
Napata, 315—Wealth of Napata, 316—Piankhis rise to
potter, 317 His protectorate of Egypt, 318—Revolt of Tat
rnekht and others, 318 Suppressionof the revlt, 319-322
Deathof Piankhi, and revolt of Hek-en-ranf,323-~Power
Shabak established over Egypt, 324—General character of the
Ethiopianale, 324—Advance of Assyria towards the Egyptian
border, 325—Collision between Sargon atl Shabak, 326—
Reign of ShabatokScnnachesib threatens Egypt. 327—
Reign of Tehrak, 328-330.
xvi CONTENTS.
XXL ‘
‘Tur Ficur over tHe Caxcask—Ermoria 1.
AssvRIA . . 33-340
Egypt attacked by Bsarhaldo, 331, 332 Great battle near
Memphis, 333—Memphis taken, amd fight of Tehesk to
Napata, 334-—Fgypt split upinto small states by Esarhaddon,
334, 335 —Tebrak renews the strugcle, 336 —Tebrak driven
‘nt by Asshur-baoipal, 337-—His last cbt, 337 —Artempt
tmade by Kut-Ammon fils, 38—Temporary saccess of Mi
Ammon-nat, 339-—Kgypt becomes oace more an Asian
Alependeney, 340-Hee wretched comition, 341
NI
‘Tue Conrse comes 10 Lire cats —Psawavix T.
AND 11S Sox, Neco . = ieezmas0)
help nestled to save a sinking state, 342~
‘of Psumatik Le 344-—His revolt connected with the
‘eeline of Assyria, 345—Assistance rendered him by Gyges,
1345-Hlis struggle with the petty prince, 346—Reign of
place assigned Ly him to the mercenaries, 347
His measutes for restoring Egypt to her former prosperity,
318, 349—He encorazes intercourse between Egypt and
Greece, 350-352Egypt restorel to life: charateraf the new
lite, 353 Later years of Psamatik: conquestof Ato, 354
“Reign of Neco: his two fleets, 355—His ctcamnavigation
‘of Aiea, 356 —Ilis conquest of Syria, 357—Jeremiah on the
butte of Carcheminh, 335—Necols dream of empire termi-
nates, 359.
sium,
THE Laver Sane Kixcs—Psawavtk TL, APRIES,
axp Awasis + 360-367
‘The Saitc revival in at and architecture, 360-—Some recovery
of military strength, 361—Expedition of Psamatik 1 into
Ethiopia, 362—Part taken by Apries in the war between
Nebuchadnezzar ani Zeekiah cian conquest,
364—His expedition against Cyrene, 364 Invasion of Egypt
iby Nebucharinerar, 365—CQuiet reign of Amass, 366—The
Saitc revival not the recovery of true nationallife, 367+
Tne Persian Conquest... + 368

Patient acquiescenceof Amass in his postion of tributary to
Babylon, 368-—Kise of the Fenian power under Cyrus, and
made by Cranas to Amavis, League of Egypt, Lydia,
160, 370 Precpitancy of Crass, 371—Fak of
371-—Later wats of Cyrus, 372-—Preparations made
against Egypt by Cambyses, 373, 374-—Great battle of Pel
Slum, 375--Pssmatik 1 , besieged in Memphis
Memphis, and evel treatmentof the Egyptians by Cambyses,
His iconoclasm checke by some considerations of
policy, 379—Conciiatory measures of Darius Hystaspis, 379,
380.
XXV.
‘Tuer Desperate Revours . . . + 380-386
Fisst revolt, under Khabash, easily suppressed by Nerses,
4381, 382—Second revolt under Inards and Amr, asst
iby Athens, 382, 383—Suppressed by Megabyzus, 384—Hero-
dows in Egypt, 383—Third revolt, under Nefaacret, attains
certain success; a native monarchy re-established, 386.
VE.
ccraweno ILA Last Guram oF Suxsuixe . 387-392
Unguiet time under the earlier suecesons of Nefa-eat, 387—
Preparations of Nectanebo (Nekht Horcheb for the better
protection of Egypt against the Persians, 388—Invasion of
Egypt by Pharnabazas and Iphirates, 38—Failare of the
‘expeition, 30-A faint revival of art and architecture, 39%
avi
NXVIL
THe Licht Gors ovr «:
Reign of Te-her(Tacho), 393 Reignof NectaneloTH, (Nekht-
nebt), 304 Revolt ofSi Ochs,
304, 398 Sidon betaye non of Rhos,
396--March upon Egypt the Persian forces,
Sor—Shinnish at Peluiom, and retreat of Nekh-neht 10
Memphis, 398, 399—Capture of Pelasiom, 399-—Surrender of
Bubastiy, 4oo"Nebktnelt fies to. Ethiopia, 401 Gencea
reflections, 402,
inpex oh) a oe eee

LIST OF IL] STRATIONS.
Frontispiece
7
6
37
‘TABLED OF SNEFERU AT WADY-MAGHARAH
59
6
TOME CHAMH
SARCOPHAGUS OF MYCERIN co 8
TRUCTION
”
7
VIEW OF THE FIRST AND SECOND PYRAMIDS 87
xx LISP OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
SPFARING THE CROCODILE en
opouis 0 eg
HUST OF A SHEPHERD KING « 7 ae
HEAD OF NEFERTARLANHMES. es
BUST OF THOTAMES|1.) 4/50) 0 ee
MEAD OF THOTHMES I. LON ec
HEAD OF QUEEN HATASU 6 0. 5s) s 7
OF TEMPLE At MPDINET: pou. 175
PGVPTIAN SHIP INTHE TIME OF HATASU eee
HOUSE BUILT OX PILES IN THE LAND OF PUNT. . 181
que OF PUNE AT THE COURE OF HATASU «183
SECTION OF THE P ARED HALL OF THOTHMES111
RUST OF THOTHMES UL. 55 sss 205;
TWIN COLOSSI OF AMENHOTEP I AT THERES . 209)
HUST OF AMENHOTEP
KHUENATEN WOR: IE SOLAR DIK. 235
BUST OF RAMESSES IL. 4 4 5 5 «= 125i

HEAD OF MENEPHTHAH ‘ a2 Pemeiacs
SEA-FIGHT IN THE TIME OF RAMESSES II. 4.279
CARICATURE OF THE Wk OF HE SAME... 286
HEAD OF ROR) = uel a Tia
FIGURE RECORD! 1G THE cONQUES oF Juba. By
‘suIsHAK + 305,
LIST OF ILLUSTKATIONS. xxi
HE NAHR-EL-KELY
HEAD OF PSAMATIK 1 eS
BAS-RELIEFS OF THE TIME OF PSAMATIK 1 351
HEAD OF NECO ap 8 355
THE STORY OF ANCIENT EGYPT.
i
THE LAND OF EGYPT,
IN shape Egypt is like a lily with a crooked stem.
A broad blossom terminates it at its upper end; a
button of a bud projects from the stalk a little below.
the blossom, on the left-hand side. The broad blossom
is the Delta, extending from Aboosir to Tinch, a
direct distance of a hundred and cighty miles, which
the projection of the coast—the graceful swell of the
petais—enlarges to two hundred and thirty. ‘The bud
is the Fayoum, a natural depression in the hills that
shut in the Nile valley on the west, which has been
rendered cultivable for many thousands of years by the
introduction into it of the Nile water, through a canal
known as the “Bahr Yousouf” ‘The long stalk of the
lily is the Nile valley itself, which is a ravine scooped
in the rocky soil for seven hundred miles from the
First Cataract to the apex of the Delta, sometimes,
not more than a mile broad, never more than eight or
ten miles. No other country in the world isso strangely,
2 THE LAND OF EGYPT.
shaped, so long compared to its width, so straga Be
so hard to govern from a single centre.
‘At the first glance, the country seems to divide
itself into two strongly contrasted regions; and this
was the original impression which it made upon its
inhabitants. The natives from a very early time
designated their land as “ the two lands,” and repre=
sented it by a hieroglyph in which the form used to
express “land” was doubled. The kings were called,
«chiefs of the Two Lands,” and wore two crowns, as
being kings of two countries. The Hebrews caught
up the idea, and though they sometimes called Egypt
“Mazor ” in the singular number, preferred commonly
ate it by the dual form “ Mizraim,” which
means “the two Mazors.” These “two Mazors,”
“two Egypts)” or “two lands,” were, of course, the
blossom and the stalk, the broad tract upon the
Mediterranean known as “ Lower
Delta,” and the long narrow valley that
green snake, to the south, which bears the
“Upper Egypt;” or “the Said.” Nothing is more
striking than the contrast between these two regions,
itering Egypt from the Mediterranean, or from
Asia by the caravan route, the traveller sees stretching
before him an apparently boundless plain, wholly uns
broken by natural clevations, generally green with,
crops or with marshy plants, and canopied by a cloud
less sky, which rests everywhere on a distant flat
horizon. An absolute monotony surrounds him, No,
alternation of plain and highland, meadow and forest
no slopes of hills, or hanging woods, or dells, or gorges,
or cascades, or rushing streams, or babbling rills, meet
THE CHIEF DIVISIONS. 3
his gaze on any side; look which way he will, all is
sameness, one vastsmooth expanse of rich alluvial
soil, varying only in being cultivated or else allowed
to lie waste. Turning his back with something of
weariness on the dull uniformity of this featurctess
plain, the wayfarer proceeds southwards,and enters, at
the distance of a hundred miles from the coast, on an
entirely new scene, Instead of an illimitable prospect,
meeting him on every side, he finds himself in a com-
paratively narrow vale, up and down which the eye still
‘commands an extensive view, but where the prospect
‘on cither side is blocked at the distance of a few miles
by rocky ranges of hills, white or yellow or tawny
sometimes drawing so near as to threaten an obstruc-
tion of the river course, sometimes receding so far as
to leave some miles of cultivable soil on either side of
the stream. The rocky ranges, as he approaches
them, have a stern and forbidding aspect. They rise
for the most part, abruptly in bare grandeur ; on their
craggy Jdes grows neither moss nor heather ; no trees
clothe th steep heights, They sec nded, like
the mountains that enclosed the abode of Rasselas, to
keep in the inhabitants of the vale within their narrow,
its, and bar them out from any commerce or ac-
quaintance with the regions beyond.
Such is the twofold division of the country which
impresses the observer strongly at the first. On a
longer sojourn and a more intimate familiarity, the
twofold division gives place t0 one which is three-
fold. The lower differs from the upper valley, it is a
sort of debatable region, half plain, half vale; the
fable surface spreads itself out more widely, the
enclosing hills recede into the distance ; above all, to
the middle tract belongs the open space of the Fayoum,
nearly fifty miles across in its greatest diameter, and
containing an area of four hundred square miles,
Hence, with some of the occupants of Egypt a triple
division has been preferred to a twofold one, the
Greeks interposing the “Heptanomis” between the
‘Thebais and the Delta, and the Arabs the “ Vostani”
between the Said and the Bahari, or “ country of the
8¢%
It may be objected to this description, that the Egypt
hn it presents to the reader is not the Egypt of the
maps. Undoubtedly it is not. ‘The maps give the
name of Egypt to a broad rectangular space which
they mark out in the north-eastern corner of Africa,
bounded on two sides by the Mediterranean and the
Red Sea, and on the two others by two imaginary,
lines which the map-makers kindly draw for us across
the sands of the desert. But “this Egypt,” as has
been well observed, “is a fiction of the geographers,
as untrue to fact as the island Atlantis of Greek
legend, or the Lyonnesse of medieval romance, both,
sunk beneath the ocean to explain their disappearance.
‘The true Egypt of the old monuments, of the Hebrews,
of the Greeks and Romans, of the Arabs, and of its
‘own people in this day, is a mere fraction of this vast
ea of the maps, nothing more than the valley and
n watered by the Nile, for nearly seven hundred
s course from the Mediterranean
southwards”* ‘The great wastes on either side of the
Nile valley are pt, neither the un-
4 R, Swart Post, * Cities
of Beypt” Pode
NATURE PREFERABLE TO MAPS. 5
dulating sandy desert to the west, nor the rocky and
gravelly highland to the east, which rises in terrace
after terrace to a height, in some places, of six thou-
sand fe t. Both are sparsely inhabited, and by tribes
of adifferent race from the Egyptian—tribes whose
allegiance to the rulers of Egypt is in the best times
nominal, and who for the most part spurn the very
jdea of submission to authority.
the true Egypt be the tract that we have
valley, with the Fayoum and the
Delta—the lily stalk, the bud, and the blossom—we
can welll understand how it came to be said of old,
that “ Egypt was the gift of the river.” Not that the
lively Greck, who first used the expression, divined
exactly the scientific truth of the matter. The fancy
of Herodotus saw Africa, originally, doubly severed
from Asia by two parallel fjords, one running inland
northwards from the Indian Ocean, as the Red
does to this day, and the other penetrating inland
southwards from the Mediterranean to an equal or
greater distance! ‘The Nile, he said, pouring itself
into this latter fjord, had by degrees filled it up, and
hhad then gone on and by further deposits turned into
land a large piece of the “sea of the Greeks,” as was
evident from the projection of the shore of the Delta
beyond the general coast-line of Africa eastward and
westward ; and, he added, “I am convinced, for my.
own part, that if the Nile should please to divert
waters from their present bed into the Red Sea, he
would fill it up and turn it into dry land in the space
of twenty thousand years, or maybe in half that
time—for he is a mighty river and a most energetic
one” Here, in this last expression, he is thoroughly,
ht, though the method of the Nile’s energy has
bbeen other than he supposed. The Nile, working from
its immense reservoirs in the equatorial regions, has
gradually scooped itself out a deep bed in the sand
and rock of the desert, which must have originally
extended across the whole of northern Africa from
the Atlantic to the Red Sea. Having scooped itself
‘out this bed toa depth, in places, of three hundred
feet from the desert level, it has then proceeded,
partially to fill it up with its own deposits. Occupying,
when it is at its height, the entire bed, and presenting
at that time the appearance of a vast lake, or succession
of lakes, it deposes every day a portion of sediment
over the whole space which it covers: then, co
tracting gradually, it leaves at the base of the hills,
on both sides, or at any rate on one, a strip of land.
fresh dressed with mud, which gets wider daily as the
‘waters still recede, until yards grow into furlongs, and.
furlongs into miles, and at last the shrunk stream is
content with a narrow channel a few hundred yards
in width, and leaves the rest of its bed to the embraces
of sun and air, and, if he so wills, to the industry of
man, The land thus left exposed Egypt—Egypt
is the temporaril y uncovered bed of the Nile, which it
reclaims and recovers duringa portion of each year,
when Egypt disappears from view, save where human
labour has by mounds and embankments formed
artifcal islands thatraise their heads above the waste
of waters, for the most part crowned with build-
ings.
‘There is one exception to this broad and sweeping
THE NILE. 7
statement. The Fayoum is no pert of the natura’
bed of the Nile, and has not bees: scooped out by its
energy. It is a natural depression in the western
desert, separated off from the Nile valley by a
Of limestone hills from two hundred to five hu
feet in height, t from the activity of man
would have been arid, treeless, and waterless. Still,
it derives from the Nile all its value, all its richness,
all its fertility. Human energy at some remote
introduced into the depressed tract through an.
artificial channel from the Nile, cut in some places
through the rock, the life-giving fluid ; and this fluid,
bearing the precious Nile sediment, has sufficed to
spread fertility over the entire region, and to make
the desert blossom like a gard
The Egyptians were not unaware of the source of
From a remote date they speculated
ysterious river, They deified it under the
that he was an inscrutable
god, that none could tell his they acknow-
Tedged him as the giver of all good things, and espe
ially of the fruits of the earth. They said—
Hit to thes, O Nilet
how showest thyself in
Coming in peace, givin
© Ammon, shou lendest night unto day,
A leading that rejoices the hex
‘sertlowing the gardens crated by Ra y
Giving life to all animals
‘Watering the land without ceasing
‘The way of heaven descending
LLorer of food, bustower of co
Giving life to every home, O Phihaht« <2
0 inunation of Nile, offerings are made to thee5
(Oxen are slain to thee;
Great festivals are kept for thees
Fowls are sacrificed to thee;
Beasts of the field are caught fo thee
ure ames are offered to thes
(Offerings are made to every god,
As they are made unto Nile,
Incense ascends unto
als, fowlsa
takes for himself chasms in the Thebafd5
Unknown is hisname in heaven,
He doth not manifest his forms
‘Vain ae all representations!
‘Mortals extol him, and the eycle of gots2
‘Ave is fel by the terrible ones 5
His son is male Lord of all,
shine forth?
Giving ifeto his oxen by the pastures!
Shine forth in glory, O Nile t"*
‘Though thus useful, beneficent, and indeed essential
to the existence of Egypt, the Nile can scarcely be said
to add much to the variety of the landscape or to the
beauty of the scenery. It is something, no doubt, to
have the sight of water in a land where the sun beats
down all day long with unremitting force till the earth
is likea furnace of iron beneath a sky of molten brass.
But the Nile is never clear. During the inundation it,
is deeply stained with the red argillaceous soil brought,
down from the Abyssinian highlands. At other
seasons it is always more or less tinged with the
vegetable matter which it absorbs on its passage from,
Lake Victoria to Khartoum; and this vegetable
* Translation by F. C. Cook.
SMALL SIZE OF EGYPT. 9
matter, combined with its depth and volume, gives it
a dull deep hue, which prevents it from having the
attractiveness of purer and more translucent str
The Greek name, Neilos, and the Hebrew, Sichor,
are thought to embody this attribute of the mighty
and to mean “dark blue” or“ blue-black,” terms
sui ntly expressive of the stream’s ordinary colour.
Moreover, the Nile is too wide to be picturesque. It
is seldom less than a mile broad from the point where
it enters Egypt, and running generally between flat
shores it scarcely reflects anything, unless it be the
grey-blue sky overhead, or the sails of a passing
pleasure boat.
The size of Egypt, within the limits which have
een here assigned to it, is about eleven. thousand
four hundred square miles, or less than that of any
European State, except Belgium, Saxony, and Servia,
Magnitude is, however, but an insignificant element
in the greatness of States—witness Athens, Sparta,
Rhodes, Genoa, Florence, Venice. Egypt is the
richest and most productive land in the whole world.
In its most flourishing age we are told that it con-
tained twenty thousand cities. It deserved to be called,
more (probably) than even Belgium, “ one great town.
But its area was undoubtedly small. Still, as little
men have often taken the highest rank among
warriors, so little States have filled a most important
place in the world’s history. Palestine was about the
size of Wales; the entire Peloponnese was no larger
than New Hampshire ; Attica had nearly the same
area as Cornwall. ‘Thus the case of Egypt does not
stand by itself, but is merely oneout of many exceptions
to what may perhaps be called the general rule,
10 THe LAND OF & ver.
If stinted for space, 'gypt was happy in her soil
and in her situation, The rich alluvium, continually
growing deeper and deeper, and top-dressed each
year by nature’s bountiful hand, was of an inexhaust-
ible fertility, and bore readily year after yeara three-
fold harvest—first a grain crop, and then two erops of
grasses or escuilent vegetables. The wheat sown
returned a hundredfold to the husbandman, and was
gathered at harvest-time in prodigal abundance—
as the sand of the sea, very much,’— till men “left
numbering” (Gen. xli. 49). Flax and doora were
largely cultivated, and enormous quantities were
produced of the most nutritive vegetables, such as
lentils, garlic, leeks, onions, endive, radishes, melons,
cucumbers, lettuces, and the like, which formed a most
important element in the food of the people. The
vine was also grown in many places, as along the
flanks of the hills between Thebes and Memphis. i
the basin of the Fayoum,at Anthylla in the Mareoti
at Sebennytus (now Semnood), and at Plisthiné, on
the shore of the Mediterranean, ‘The date-palm,
springing naturally from the soil in clumps, or groves,
or planted in avenues, everywhere offered its golden
* clusters to the wayfarer, dropping its fruit into his
lap. Wheat, however, was throughout antiquity the
chief product of Egypt, which was reckoned the
granary of the world, the refuge and resource of all
the neighbouring nations in time of dearth, and on
which in the later republican, and in the imperial
times, Rome almost wholly depended for her sus-
tenance.
If the soil was thusall that could be wished, still more
ADVANTAGES OF GEOGRAPHIC POSITION. ti
advantageous was the situation. Egypt was the only
nation of the ancient world which had ready access
to two seas, the Northern Sea, or “ Sea of the Greeks,”
and the Eastern Sea, or “Sea of the Arabians and the
Indians.” Phoenicia might carry her traffic by the
painful travel of caravans across fifteen degrees of
desert from her cit es on the Levantine coast to the
inner recess of the Persian Gulf, and thus get a share
in the trade of the East at a vast expenditure of time
and trouble. Assyria and Babylonia might for a
time, when at the height of their dominion, obtain a
temporary hold on lands which were not their own,
and boast that they stretched from the “sea of the
rising” to “ that of the setting sun”—from the Persian
Guif to the Mediterranean ; but Egypt, at all times
and under all circumstances, commands by her
geographic position an access both to the Mediter-
ranean and to the Indian Ocean by way of the Red
Sea, whereof nothing can deprive her. Suez must
always be hers, for the Isthmus is her natural
boundary, and her water-system has been connected
with the head of the Arabian Gulf for more than three
thousand years; and, in the absence of any strong
State in Arabia or Abyssinia, the entire western
coast of the Red Sea falls naturally under her influence
with its important roadsteads and harbours. Thus
Egypt had two great outlets for her productions, and
‘two great inlets by which she received the productions
of other countries. Her ships could issue from the
Nilotic ports and trade with Pheenicia, or Carthage, or
Italy, or Greece, exchanging her corn and wine and
glass and furniture and works in metallurgy for
Etruscan vases, or Grecian statues, or purple Tyrlan
robes, or tin brought by Carthaginian merchantmen,
from the Scilly islands and from Cornwall; or they,
could start from Heroopolis, or Myos Hormus, ot
some port further to the southward, and pass by way
of the Red Sea to the spice-region of “Araby the
Blest,” or to the Abyssinian timber-region, or to the
shores of Zanzibar and Mozambique, or round Arabia
to Teredon on the Persian Gulf, or possibly to Ceylon
or India. ‘The products of the distant east, even of
“far Cathay,” certainly flowed into the land, for they
have been dug out of the ancient tombs ; but whether
they were obtained by direct or by indirect commerce
must be admitted to be doubtful.
The possession of the Nile was of extraordinary
advantage to Egypt, not merely as the source of fer-
tility, but asa means of rapid communication. One
of the greatest impediments to progress and civili
tion which Nature offers to man in regions which he
has not yet subdued to his will, is the difficulty of
locomotion and of transport. Mountains, forests,
torrents, marshes, jungles, are the curses of “new
countries,” forming, until they have been cut through,
bridged over, or tunnelled under, insurmountable
barriers, hindering commerce and causing hatreds
through isolation. Egypt had from the first a broad
road driven through it from end to end—a road seven
hundred miles long,and seldom much less than a mile
fde—which allowed of ready and rapid communica-
tion between the remotest parts of the kingdom,
Rivers, indeed, are of no use as arteries cf commerce
o¢ vehicles for locomotion until men have invented
BGYPT DURING THE NUNDATION, 13
ships or boats, or at least rafts, to descend and ascend
them ; but the Egyptians were acquainted with the
use of boats and rafts from a very remote period, and,
took to the water like a brood of ducks or a parcel
of South Sea Islanders, Thirty-two centuries ago an,
Egyptian king built a temple on the confines of the
Mediterranean entirely of stone which he floated dow
the Nile for six hundred and fifty miles from the
quarries of Assouan and the passage up the
river is fora considerable portion of the year as easy
as the passage down, Northerly winds—the famous
“Etesian gales "—prevail in Egypt during the whole
of the summer and autumn, and by hoisting a sail
most always possible to ascend the stream at a
good pace. If the sail be dropped, the current will
at all times take a vessel down-stream ; and thus boats,
and even vessels of a large size, pass up and down the
water-way with equal facility.
Egypt is at all seasons a strange country, but pre-
sents the most astonishing appearance at the period
of the inundation, At that time not only is the
lengthy valley from Assouan to Cairo laid under
water, but the Delta itself becomes one vast lake,
interspersed with islands, which stud its surface here
and there at intervals, and which reminded Herodotus,
of “the islands of the Agean.” The clevations, which,
are the work of man, are crowned for the most pa
with the white walls of towns and vi lages sparkling
in the sunlight, and sometimes glassed in the flood
beneath them. The palms and sycamores stand up,
out of the expanse of waters shortened by some five
or six feet of their height. Everywhere, when the
inundation begins, the inhabitants are seen hurrying
their cattle to the shelter provided in the villages, and,
if the rise of the water is more rapid than usual,
numbers rescue their beasts with difficulty, causing
them to wade or swim, or even saving them by means
of boats. An excessive inundation brings not only
animal, but human life into peril, endangering the
villages themselves, which may be submerged and
swept away if the water rises above a certain height,
‘A deficient inundation, on the other hand, brings no
immediate danger, but by limiting production may.
create a dearth that causes incalculable suffering.
Nature's operations are, however, so uniform that
these calamities rarely arise. Egypt rejoices, more
than almost any other country, in an equable climate,
an equable temperature, and an equable productive-
ness. The summers, no doubt, are hot, especially in
the south, and an occasional sirocco produces intense
discomfort while it lasts. But the cool Etesian wind,
blowing from the north through nearly all the summer-
time, tempers the ardour of the sun’s rays even in the
hottest season of the year ; and during the rem:
months, from October to April, the climate is
delightful. Egypt has been said to have but two
seasons, spring and summer. Spring reigns from
October into May—crops spring up, flowers bloom,
soft zephyrs fan the check, when it is mid-winter in
Europe; by February the fruit-trees are in full
blossom; the crops begin to ripen in March, and are
reaped by the end of April; snow and frost are
wholly unknown at any time; storm, fog, and even,
rain are rare. A bright, lucid atmosphere rests upon
GEOLOGY AND FLORA. 5
the entire scene. ‘There is no moisture in the air, no,
cloud in the sky; no mist veils the distance. Oneday
follows another, each the counterpart of the preceding;
until at length spring retires to make room for
summer, anda ficrcer light, a hotter sun, a longer
day, show that the most enjoyable part of the year
is gone by.
‘The geology of Egypt is simple. The entire flat
country is alluvial. The hills on either side are, in the
north, limestone, in the central region sandstone, and
in the south granite and syenite, ‘The granitic forma.
tion begins between the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth
parallels, but occasional masses of primitive rock are
intruded into the secondary regions, and these extend
northward as far as lat. 27°10’. Above the rocks are,
in many places, deposits of gravel and sand, the
former hard, the latter loose and shifting. A portion
of the eastern desert is metalliferous, Gold is found
even at the present day in small quantities, and seems
anciently to have been more abundant. Copper,
and lead have been also met with in modern times,
and one iron mine shows signs of having been anciently
worked. Emeralds abound in the region about
Mount Zabara, and the eastern desert further yields
jaspers, carnelians, breccia verde, agates, chaleedonies,
and rock-crystal.
‘The flora of the country is not parti larly interest-
ing. Dom and date palms are ¢ c prineipal trees, the
latter having a single taper the former divid-
ing into branches. ‘The sy sus sycamorus) is
also tolerably common, as are several species of
acacia. The acacia seyal, which furnishes the gum
arabic of commerce, is “a gnarled and thorny tree,
somewhat like a solitary hawthorn in its habit and
manner of growth, but much larger.” Its height, when,
full grown, is from fifteen to twenty feet. The fersea,a
sacred plant among the ancient Egyptians, is a bushy,
tree or shrub, which attains the height of eighteen or
twenty feet under favourable circumstances, and bears,
a fruit resembling a date, with a subacid flavour. The
bark is whitish, the branches gracefully curved, the
foliage of an ashy grey, more especially on its under
surface. Specially characteristic of Egypt, though,
not altogether peculiar to it, were the papyrus and the.
lotus—the Cyperus papyrus and Nymphaea lotus of
botanists. The papyrus was a tall smooth reed, with,
a large triangular stalk containing a delicate pith, out
of which the Egyptians manufactured their paper.
‘The fabric was excellent, as is shown by its continu-
ance to the present day, and by the fact that the
Grecks and Romans, after long trial, preferred it to
parchment. The lotus was a large white water-lilyof
‘exquisite beauty. Kings offered itto the gods ; guests
wore it at banquets ; architectural forms were modelled
upon it; it was employed in the ornamentation of
thrones, Whether its root had the effect on men as-
cribed to it by Homer may be doubted; but no one
evor saw it without recognizing it instantly as “a
thing of beauty,” and therefore as ‘a joy for ever:
Nor can Egypt have afforded in ancient times
any very exciting amusement to sportsmen. At the
present day gazelles are chased with hawk and hound
during the dry season on the broad expanse of the
Delta; but anciently the thick population scared off the
MONOTONY OF EGYPT. 19
whole antelope tribe, which was only to be found in the
desert region beyond the limits of the alluvium. Nor
can Egypt, in the proper sense of the word, have ever
been the home of red-deer, roes, or fallow-deer,of lions,
bears, hyenas, lynxes, or rabbits. Animals of these
lasses may occasionally have appeared in the alluvial
plain, but they would only be rare visitants driven by
hunger from their true habitat in the Libyan or the
Arabian uplands. The crocodile, however, and the
hippopotamus were actually hunted by the ancient
Egyptians; and they further indulged their love of sport
in the pursuits of fowling and fishing. All kinds of
waterfowl are at all seasons abundant in the Nile
wate and especially frequent the pools left by the
retiring river—pelicans, geese, ducks, ibises, cranes,
storks, herons, dotterels, Kingfishers, and sea-swallows.
Quails also arrive in great numbers in the month of
March, though there are no pheasants, snipe, wood
nor partridges. Fish are very plentiful in
the Nile and the canals derived from it ; but there
are not many kinds which afford much sport to the
fisherman,
ether, Egypt is a land of tranquil monotony.
commonly travels either over a waste of
waters, or over a green plain unbroken by elevations.
‘The hills which inclose the Nile valley have level tops,
and sides that are bare of trees, or shrubs, or flowers,
or even mosses. The sky is generally cloudless. No
fog or mist enwraps the distance in mystery; no
rainstorm sweeps across the scene; no rainbow spans
the empyrean ; no shadows chase each other over the
landscape. There is an entire absence of picturesque
scenery. A single broad river, unbroken within the
limits of Egypt even by a rapid, two flat strips of green,
plain at its side, two low lines of straight-topped hills,
beyond them, and a boundless open space where the
river divides itself into half a dozen sluggish branches
before reaching the sea, constitute Egypt, which is by
naturea southern Holland—* weary, stale, flat and un-
profitable.” ‘The monotony is relieved, however, in two,
ways, and by two causes. Nature herself does some-
thing to relieve it. Twice a day, in the morning and
in the evening, the sky and the landscape are lit up
by hues so bright yet so delicate, that the homely
features of the prospect are at once transformed as by
magic, and wear an aspect of exquisite beauty. At
dawn long streaks of rosy light stretch themselves
across the eastern sky, the haze above the western
horizon blushes a deep red ; a ruddy light diffuses it-
self around, and makes walls and towers and minarets
and cupolas to glow like fire; the long shadows
thrown by each tree and building are purple or violet.
A glamour is over the scene, which seems trans-
figured by an enchanter’s wand ; but the enchanter
Nature, and the wand she wields is composed of sun-
rays, Again, at eve, nearly the same effects are pro-
duced as in the morning, only with a heightened
cffect; “the redness of flames” passes into “the redness
of roses”"—the wavy cloud that fled in the morning
comes into sight once more—comes blushing, yet still
‘comes on—comes burning with blushes, and clings to
the Sun-god'’s side.t
Night brings a fresh transfiguration. The olive
* Adapted fiom Mr. Kinglake's “ Bothen,"p. 188.
MONOTONY BROKEN BY ARCHITECTURE. 21
after-glow gives place to a deep blue-grey. The
yellow moon rises into the vast expanse. A softened
light diffuses itself over earth and sky. The orb of
night walks in brightness through a firmament of
sapphire ; or, if the moon is below the horizon, then
the purple vault is lit up with many-coloured. stars.
Silence profound reigns around. A phase of beauty
wholly different from that of the day-time smites the
sense; and the monotony of feature is forgiven to the
changefulness of expression, and to the experience of
a new delight.
‘Man has also done his part to overcome the dulness
and sameness that brood over the “land of Mizraim.”
Where nature is most tame and commonplace, man
is tempted to his highest flights of audacity. As in
the level Babylonia he aspired to build a tower that
should “ reach to heaven ” (Gen. xi. 4), so in Egypt he
strove to startle and surprise by gigantic works, enor-
mous undertakings, 1 ‘erprises that might have seemed.
wholly beyond his powers. And these ha consti-
tuted in all ages, except the very earliest, the great
attractiveness of Egypt. Men are drawn there, not,
by the mysteriousness of the Nile,or the mild beauties,
of orchards and palm-groves, of well-cultivated fields
and gardens—no, nor by the lovelinessof sunrises and,
sunsets, of moonlit skies andstars shining with many,
hues, but by the huge masses of the pyramids, by the
colossal statues, the tal obelisks, the enormous tem-
ples, the deeply-excavated tombs, the mosques, the
castles, and the palaces. The architecture of Egypt
s great glory. It began carly, and it has con-
tinued late, But for the great works, strewn thickly
over the whole valley of the Nile, the land of Egypt
would have obtained but a small share of the world’s,
attention; and it is at least doubtful whether its
“story” would ever have been thought necessary to
complete “ the Story of the Nations.”
IL
‘THE PEOPLE OF FGYPT,
Wrere the Egyptians came from, is a difficult
question to answer. Ancient speculators, when they
could not derive a people definitely from any other,
took refuge in the statement, ur the figment,that they
were the children of the soil which they had always
occupied. Modern theorists may say, if it please
them, that they were evolved out of the monkeys that
had their primitive abode on that particular portion of
the earth's surface, Monkeys, howeves, are not found
everywhere ; and we have no evidence that in Egypt
they were ever indigenous, though, as pets, they were
very common, the Egyptians delighting in keeping
them. Such evidence as we have reveals to us the
man as anterior to the monkey in the land of Mizraim,
Thus we are thrown back on the original question—
Where did the man, or race of men, that is found in
Egypt at the dawn of history come from?
It is generally answered that they came from Asi
but this is not much more than a conjecture. The
physical type of the Egyptians is different from that
of any known Asiatic nation. ‘The Egyptians had no
traditions that at all connected them with Asia. ‘Their
language, indeed, in historic times was partially
24. THE PEOPLE OF KaYPT.
‘Semitic, and allied to the Hebrew, the Phoenician, ana,
the Aramaic; but the relationship was remote, and,
may be partly accounted for by later intercourse, with-
out involving original derivation, The fundamental
character of the Egyptian in respect of physical type,
language, and tone of thought, is Nigritic The
yptians were not negroes, but they bore a resem-
blance to the negro which is indisputable. ‘Their type
differs from the Caucasian in exactly those respects
which when exaggerated produce the negro. They
were darker, had thicker lips, lower forcheads, larger
heads, more advancing jaws, a flatter foot, anda more
attenuated frame. It is quite conceivable that the
negro type was produced by'a gradual degeneration
from that which we find in Egypt. It is even con-
ceivable that the Egyptian type was produced by
gradual advance and amelioration from that of the
negro.
Still, whencesoever derived, the Egyptian people, as
it existed in the flourishing times of Egyptian history,
was beyond all question a mixed race, showing diverse
finities. Whatever the people was originally, it re-
ceived into it from time to time various foreign
slements, and those in such quantities as seriously
to affect its physique—Ethiopians from the south,
Libyans from the west, Semites from the north-east,
where Africa adjoined on Asia. There are two quite
different types of Egyptian form and feature, blending
together in the mass of the nation, but strongly de-
veloped, and (so to speak) accentuated in individuals.
One is that which we see in portraits of Rameses IIL,
and in some of Rameses II.—a moderately high fore-
EGYPTIAN PHYSIQUE—TWO TYPES. 25
head, a large, well-formed aquiline nose, a well-shaped
mouth with lips not over full, and a delicately rounded
chin, The other is comparatively coarse—forehead
low, nose depressed and short, lower part of the face
prognathous and sensual-looking, chin heavy, jaw
large, lips thick and projecting. The two types of
face are not, however, accompanied by much differ-
ence of frame. The Egyptian is always slight in
figure, wanting in muscle, flat in foot, with limbs that
are too long, too thin, too lady-like. Something more
of muscularity appears, perhaps, in the earlier than in
the later forms; but this is perhaps attributable to a
modification of the ar ic ideal
As Egypt presents us with two t ypes of ph ysique,
0 it brings before us two strongly different types of
character. On the one hand we see, alike in the pic-
tured scenes, in the native literary remains, and in the
accounts which foreigners have left us of the people,
‘a grave and dignified race. full of serious and sober
thought, given to speculation and reflection, occupied
rather with the terests belonging to another world
than with those that tach to this present scene of
existence, and. in. ed to indulge in a gentle and
dreamy melancholy. The first thought of a king, when
he began his reign, s to begin his tomb. The desire
of the grandee was similar. It isa ti fe tale how at
feasts a slave carried round toalll the guests the repre-
sentation ofa mummied corpse, and showed it to each
in turn, with the solemn words—* Look at this, and so
eat and drink; for be sure that one day such as this
thou shalt be” ‘The favourite song of the Egyptians,
according to Herodotus, was a dirge. The“ Lay of
26 THE PEOPLE OF EGYPT.
Harper,” which we subjoin, sounds a key-note that
was very familiar, at any rate, to large numbers among,
the Egyptians.
‘The Great One! has gone to
de his task and is ra
‘This men are aye passing away,
‘And youths are aye taking ther pace,
As Ra tises up every morn,
‘And Tum every evening doth st,
So women conceive and bring fort,
"And men without ceasing beget
ach soul inits tuen draweth breath
‘Each man bom of woman sees Death.
‘Take thy pleasure to-day,
Father! Holy One! See,
Spices and fragrant oil,
Father, we bring to thee.
(On thy sister's bosom and arms
‘Wreaths of lots we pa
(On thy sister, dear to thy heart,
‘Aye siting before thy fac
Sound the song ; let music be played
‘And let cates behind thee be Li
‘Take thy pleasure to-days
‘Mind thee of jy and delight
Soon life's pilgrimage ends,
‘And we pass to Silence Wt Night.
Patriarch perfect and pare,
Nefer-hotep, blessed one
Dist finish thy course upon.
‘And act with the bese ones now,
Men pass tothe Silent Shore,
‘And their place doth know them no more:
‘They areas they never had been,
Since the sn went forth wpon high $
‘They siton the banks of the steam
‘That foweth in sillness by.
* Neferhotep, a deceased king,
TWO TYPES OF CHARACTER. 27
‘Thy soul is among them thou
Dost drink of the sacred tide,
Hoang the wish of thy heart—
[At peace ever since thou hast died,
Give bread to the man who is poor,
‘And thy naine shall be blest evermore.
‘Take thy pleasure to-lay,
Neferhotep, blessed and pare,
What availed thee thy other buildings?
‘OF thy tomb alone thow art sure
(On the earth thou hast nought beside,
NNowght of thee ele is remaining 5
And when thou wentest below,
“Thy lst sip of life thou w
sn they who have millions to spend
Find that life comes t Ins to an ends
et all, then, think of the day
Of departe without
Twill then be well has
{All in and injustice spurning.
For he who has loved the right,
Tn the hour that none ean
ters upon the delight
(Of glad eternity.
Give freely from out thy st
Ad thou shalt be blest evermore,
On the other hand, there is evidence of a lightsome,
joyous, and even frolic spirit as pervading numbers,
especially among the lower classes of the Egyptians.
“Traverse Egypt,” says a writer who knows more of
the ancient country than almost any other living
person, “examine the scenes sculptured or painted on
the walls of the chapels attached to tombs, consult
the inscriptions graven on the rocks or traced with
ink on the papyrus rolls, and you will be compelled
to modify your mistaken notion of the Egyptians
being a nation of philosophers. I defy you to find
anything more gay, more amusing, more freshly
simple, than this good-natured Egyptian people,
was fond of life and felt a profound pleasure in its
existence. Far from desiring death, they addressed,
prayers to the gods to preserve them in life, and to
give them a happy old age—an old age that should
reach, if possible, to the ‘perfect term of 110 years?
They gave themselves up to pleasures of every kind ;
they sang, they drank, they danced, they delighted in
making excursions into the country, where hunting
and fishing were occupations reserved especially for
the nobility. In conformity with this inclination
towards pleasure, sportive proposals, a pleasantry,
that was perhaps over-free, witticisms, raillery, and
a mocking spirit, were in vogue among the people,
and fun was allowed entrance even into the tombs.
In the large schools the masters had a difficulty in
training the young and keeping down their passion,
for amusements When oral exhortation failed of
success, the cane was used pretty smartly in its place;
for the wise men of the land had a saying that ‘a
boy's ears grow on his back?
Herodotus tells us how gaily the Egyptians kept
their festivals, thousands of the common people—
men, women, and children together—crowding into
the boats, which at such times covered the Nile, the
men piping, and the women clapping their hands or
striking their castanets, as they passed from town to
town along the banks of the stream, stopping at the
various landing-places, and challenging the inhabi-
" ragsch, “Histoieed'Egypte," p 15
BGYPTIAN DROLLERY, 29
tants to a contest of good-humoured Billingsgate.
From the monuments we see how the men sang at
their labours—here as they trod the wine-press or the
dough-trough, there as they threshed out the corn by
driving the oxen through the golden heaps. In one
case the words of a harvest-song have come down to
us
“Tesh for yourselves,” they sang, “thresh for yourselves,
© oxen, thresh for yourselves, for yourselves—
Bushel for yourselves, bushels for your masters 1”
Their light-hearted drollery sometimes found vent
in caricature. The grand sculptures wherewith a
king strove to perpetuate the m
exploits were travestied by satirists, who reproduced
the scenes upon papyrus as combats between cats
and rats, ‘The amorous follies of the monarch were
held up to derision by sketches of a harem interior,
where the kingly wooer was represented by a lion,
and his favourites of the softer sex by g
in serious scenes depicting the trial of souls in the
next world, the sense of humour breaks out, where
the bad man, transformed into a pig or a monk
walks off with a comical air of surprise and d
comfiture.
It does not, however, help us much towards the
true knowledge of a people to sean their frames or
study their facial angle, or even to contemplate the
outer aspect of their daily life. We want to know
their thoughts, their innermost feelings, their hopes,
their fears—in a word, their belief. Nothing tells the
character of a people so much as their religion ; and
we are only dealing superficially with the outward
shows of things until we get down to the root of their,
being, the conviction, or convictions, held in the
recesses of a people's heart. What, then, was the
Egyptian religion? What did they worship? What
did they reverence ? What future did they look,
forward to?
Enter the huge courts of an Egyptian temple, or
temple-palace, and you will see portrayed upon its
lofty walls row upon row of deities. Here the king
makes his offering to Ammon, Maut, Khons, Neith,
Mentu, Shu, Seb, Nut, Osiris, Set, Horus; there he
pours a libation to Phthah, Sekhet, Tum, Pasht,
Anuka, Thoth, Anubis ; elsewhere, it may be, he
Nephthys, Athor,
Harmachis, Nausaas, and Nebhept. One monarch
erects an altar to Satemi, Tum, Khepra, Shu, Tefnut,
Seb, Netpe, Osiris, Isis, Set, Nephthys, Horus, and
Thoth, mentioning on the same monument Phthah,
Num, Sabak, Athor, Pasht, Mentu, Neith, Anubi
Nishem, and Kartak. Another represents himself on,
a similar object as offering adoration to Ammon,
Khem, Phthah-Sokari, Seb, Nut, Thoth, Khons,
Horus, Athor, Uat (Buto),
Sekhet, Anata, Nuneb, Nebhept, and Hapi
deities are represented by distinct forms, and have
distinct attributes. Nor do they at all exhaust the
Pantheon. One modern writer enumerates seventy-
three divinities, and gives their several names and,
forms. Another has a list of sixty-three “principal
deities,” and notes that there were “ others which per-
sonified the elements, or presided over the operations
of nature, the seasons, and events.”
BGYPTIAN POLYTHEISM. 3r
themselves speak not unfrequently of “the thousand
gods,” sometimes further qualifying them, as “the
gods male, the gods female, those which belong to the
land of Egypt.” Practically, there were before the
eyes of worshippers some scores, if not some hundreds,
of deities, who invited their approach and challenged
their affections.
Nor was this the whole, or the worst. The
tian was taught to pay a religious regard to animals.
In one place goats, in another sheep, in a third hippo-
potami, in a fourth crocodiles, in a fifth vultures, in a
sixth frogs,in a seventh shrew-mice, were sacred crea-
tures, to be treated with respect and honour, and
under no circumstances to be slain, under the penalty
of death to the slayer. And besides this local animal-
cult, there was a cult which was general. Cows, cats,
dogs, ibises, hawks, and cynocephalous apes, were
sacred throughout the whole of Egypt, and woe to the
man who injured them! A Roman who accidentally
caused the death cf a cat was immediately “lynched”
by the populace. Inhabitants of neighbouring villages
would attack each other with the utmost fury if the
native of one had killed or eaten an animal held sacred,
in the other. In any house where a cat or a dog
died, the inmates were expected to mourn for them as
for a relation. Both these and the other sacred
animals wer carefully embalmed after death, and
their bodies were interred in sacred repositories.
‘The animal-worship reached its utmost pitch of
grossness and absurdity when certain individual brute
beasts were declared to be incarnate deities, and
treated accordingly. At Memphis, the ordinary
capital, there was maintained, at any rate from the
time of Aahmes I. (about 1.c, 1650),a sacred bull,
known as Hapi or Apis, which was believed to be an,
actual incarnation of the id. was an.
object of the highest ve is bull
dwelt ina temple of his own near the city, had his
train of attendant priests, his harem of cows, his meals
of the choicest food, his grooms and currycombers
who kept his coat clean and beautiful, his chamber-
Jains who made his bed, his cup-bearers who brought
him water, &c., and on fixed days was led in a festive
procession through the main streets of the town, so
that the inhabitants might see him, and come forth
from their dwellings and make obeisance. When he
died he was carefully embalmed, and deposited, to-
gether with magnificent jewels and statuettes and
vases, in a polished granite sarcophagus, cut out of a
single block, and weighing between sixty and seve
tons! The cost of an Apis funeral amounted som:
Ss we are told, to as much as £20000. To
in the sarcophagi, several long galleries were cut
in the solid rock near Memphis, from which arched
lateral chambers went off on ci her side, each con-
structed to hold one sarcophagus. The number of
Apis bulls buried in the galleries was found to be
ixty-four,
Nor was tl the only incarnate god of which Egypt
boasted. Another bull, called Mnevis, was maintained
the great temple of the Sun at Heliopolis, and,
being regarded as an incarnation of Ra or Tum, was
as much reverenced by the Heliopolites as Apis by
the Memphites. A third, called Bacis or Pacis, was
THE KING RECKONED A GOD. 33
kept at Hermonthis, which was also an incarnation of
Ra. And a white cow at Momemphis was reckoned
fan incarnation of Athor, Who can wonder that
foreign nations ridiculed a religion of this kind—one
that “turned the glory” of the Eternal Godhead
into the similitude of a calf that eateth hay ”?
The Egyptians had also a further god incarnate, who
was not shut up out of sight like the Apis and Mnevis,
and Bacis bulls and the Athor cow, but was continu-
ally before their eyes, the centre of the nation’s life,
the prime object of attention. This was the monarch,
who for the time being occupied the throne. Each
ng of Egypt claimed not only to be “son of the
Sua,” but to be an actual incarnation of the sun—
“the living Horus.” And this claim was, from an
early date, received and allowed. “Thy Majesty,’
says a courtier under the twelfth dynasty, “is the
good God . . . the great God, the equal of the Sun-
God. . . . I live from the breath which thou givest.”
Brought into the king’s presence, the courtier * falls
‘on his belly,” amazed and confounded. “I was as
one brought out of the dark ; my tongue was dumb ;
my lips failed me; my heart was no longer in my
body to know whether T was alive or dead ;” and
this, although “the god” had “addressed him mildly.”
Another courtier attributes his long life to the king's
favour, Ambassadors, when presented to the king,
“raised their arms in adoration of the good god,” and
declared to him—* Thou art like the Sun in all that
thou doest : thy heart realizesall its wishes ; shouldest
thou wish to make it day during the night,it
forthwith. . If thou sayest to the water, “Come
from the rock, it will come in a torrent suddenly at
the words of thy mouth, The god Ra is like thee in
his limbs, the god Khepra in creative force. Truly,
thou art the living image of thy father, Tum.
All thy words are accomplished daily.” Some of the
kings set up their statues in the temples by the side
of the greatest of the national deities, to be the objects
ofa similar worship.
Amid this wealth of gods, earthly and heavenly,
human, animal, and divine, an Egyptian might well feel
puzzled to make a choice. In his hesitation he was apt
to turn to that only portion of his religion which had
the attraction that myth possesses—the introduction
into a supramundane and superhuman world of a
quasi-human element, The chief Egyptian myth was
the Osirid saga, which ran somewhat as follows: “Once
upon a time the gods were tired of ruling in the upper
sphere, and resolved to take it in turns to reign over
Egypt in the likeness of men. So, after four of them,
had in succession been kings, each for a long term of
years, it happened that Osiris, the son of Seb and
Nut, took the throne, and became monarch of the
two regions, the Upper and the Lower. Osiris was
of a good and bountiful nature, beneficent in will and
words : he set himself to civilize the Egyptians, taught
them to till the fields and cultivate the vine, gave
them law and religion, and instructed them in various
useful arts, Unfortunately, he had a wicked brother,
called Set or Sutekh, who hated him for his goodness,
and resolved to compass his death. This he effected
after a while, and, having placed the body in a coffin,
he threw it into the Nile, whence it floated down to
EK :D OF OSIRIS. 35
the sea, Isis, the sister and widow of Osiris, together
with her sister Nephthys, vainly sought for a long
time her lord’s remains, but at last found them on the
Syrian shore at Byblus, where they had been cast up
by the waves. She was conveying the corpse for
embalmment and interment to Memphis, when Set
stole it from her, and cut it up into fourteen pice
which he concealed in various places. The unhappy
queen set forth in a light boat made of the papyrus
plant, and searched Egypt from end to end, until sh:
had found all the fragments, and buried them with,
due honours, She then called on her son, Horus, to
avenge his father, and Horus engaged him in a long
war, wherein he was at last victorious and took Si
prisoner. Isis now relented, and released Set, who
be it remembered, was her brother ; which so enraged
Horus that he tore off her crown, or (according to
some) struck off her head, which injury Thoth re-
paired by giving her a cow's head in place of her ow
Horus then re swed the war with his uncle, and
finally slew him th a long spear, which he drove
The gods and goddesses of the
J, Seb, Nut or Netpe, Osiris, Isis, Neph-
thys, Set, and Horus or Harmachis, were those which
‘most drew towards them the thoughts of the Egyp-
tians, the greater number being favourite objects of
worship, while Set was held in general detestation.
Tt wasa peculiar feature of the Egyptian religion,
that it contained distinctively evil and malignant
gods. Set was not, originally, such a deity ; but he
became such in course of time, and was to the later
Egyptians the very principle of evil—Evil personified.
36 THE PEOPLE OF BGYPT.
Another evil deity was Taour or Taourt, who is
represented as a hippopotamus standing on its hind-
legs, with the skin and tail of a crocodile dependent.
down its back, and a knife or a pair of shears in one
hand. Bes seems also to have been a divinity of the
same class. He was represented as a hideous dwarf,
with large outstand ears, bald, or with a plume of
feathers on his head and with a lion-skin down his
back, often carrying in his two hands two knives.
>
Even more terrible than Bes was Apep, the great

serpent, with its huge and many folds, who helped
Setagainst Osiris, and was the adversary and accuser
of souls, Savak, a god with the head of a crocodile,
seems also to have belonged to the class of malignant
beings, though he was a favourite deity with some of
the Ramesside kings, and a special object of worship.
in the Fayoum.
The complex polytheism of the monuments and
EVIL DEITIES—TAOURT, BES. 37
the literature was not, however, the practical religi
of many Egyptians, Local cults held possession of
most of the nomes, and the ordin ry Egyptian,
instead of dissipating his religious affections by
distributing them among the thousand divinities ot
the Pantheon, concentrated them on those of his
nome. If he was a Memphite, worshipped Phthah
Sekhet, and Tum ; if a Theb: |, Ammon-Ra, Maut,
Khons, and Neith; if a Heliopolite, Tum, Nebhebt

and Horas ; if a Elephantinite, Kneph, Sati, Anuka,
and Hak ; and so on, The Egyptian Pantheon was
fa gradual acerction, the result of amalgamating the
various local cults ; but these continued predominant
ir several localities ; and practically the only
deities that obtained anything like a general recog-
nition were Osi Isis, Horus, and the Nile-god,
Hapi.
Besides the common popular religion, the belief of
the masses, there was another which prevailed among
the priests and among the educated. The primary
doctrine of this esoteric rel on was the real essential
unity of the Divine Nature. The sacred tex
only to the priests and to the initiated, taught that
there was a single Being, “the sole producer of all
things both in heaven and carth, himself not pro-
duced of any,” “the only true living God, self-origi-
nated,” “who exists from the beginning,” “who has
made all things, but has not himself been made.”
This Being seemsnever to have been represented by
material, even symbolical, form. It is thought
that he had no name, or, if he had, that it must have
been unlawful to pronounce or write it. He was a
pure spirit, perfect in every respect—all-wise, almighty,
supremely good. It is of him that the Egyptian poets
use such expressions as the following: “He is not
graven in marble ; he is not beheld ; his abode is not
Known ; no shrine is found with painted figures of
him; there is no building that can contain him ;”
and, again : “Unknown is his name in heaven; he
doth not manifest his forms; vain are all representa-
tions ;” and yet again : “ His commencement is from
the beginning; he is the God who has existed from
old time; there is no God without him; no mother
bore him ; no father hath begotten him; he is a god-
goddess, ereated from himself; all gods came into
existence when he began.”
‘The other gods, the gods of the popular mythology,
ESOTERIC RELIGION. 30
were understood in the esoteric religion to be either
personified attributes of the Deity, or parts of the
nature which he had created, considered as informed
and inspired by him. Num or Kneph represented
the creative mind, Phthah the creative hand, or act
of creating; Maut represented matter, Ra the sun,
Khons the moon, Seb the earth, Khem the generative
power in nature, Nut the upper hemisphere of the
heavens, Athor the lower world or under hemisphere
‘Thoth personified the Divine Wisdom, Ammon per-
haps the Divine mysteriousness or incomprehensibility,
Osiris the Divine Goodness. It is difficult in many
cases to fix on the exact quality, act, or part of nature
intended; but the principle admits of no doubt. No
educated Egyptian conceived of the popular gods as
really separate and distinct beings. All knew that
there was but One God, and understood that, when,
worship was offered to Khem, or Kneph, or Maut, oF
Thoth, or Ammon, the One God was worshipped
under some one of his forms or in some one of his
aspects. He was every god, and thus all the gods’
names were interchangeable, and in one and the same
hymn we may find a god, say Ammon, addressed also
as Ra and Khem and Tum and Horus and Khepra;
or Hapi, the Nile-god, invoked as Ammon and
Phthah; or Osiris as Ra and Thoth; or, in fact,
any god invoked as almost any other. If there be a
limit, itis in respect of the evil deities, whose names
are not given to the good on
Common to all
belief, if not, strictly speaking, in the immortality of
the soul, yet, at any rate, ina life after death, and a
judgment of every man according to the deeds which)
hhe had done in the body while upon earth, It was
universally received, that, immediately after death,
the soul descended into the Lower World, and was
conducted to the “Hall of Truth,” where it was
judged in the presence of Osiris and of the forty-two
assessors, the “Lords of Truth” and judges of the
dead. Anubis, “ the director of the weight,” brought
forth a pair of scales, and, placing in one scale a
figure or emblem of Truth, set in the other a vase
containing the good actions of the deceased; Thoth
standing by the while, with a tablet in his hand,
whereon to record the result. According to the
side on which the balance inclined, Osiris, the presi
dent, delivered sentence. If the good deeds prepon-
derated, the blessed soul was allowed to enter the
“boat of the Sun,” and was led by good spirits to
Aahlu (Elysium), to the “pools of peace” and the
dwelling-place of Osiris. If, on the contrary, the
good deeds were insufficient, if the ordeal was not
passed, then the unhappy soul was sentenced, accord-
ing to its deserts, to begin a round of transmigrations
into the bodies of more or Jess unclean animals, the
number, nature, and duration of the transmigrations
depending on the degree of the deceased’s demerits,
and the consequent length and severity of the punish-
ment which he deserved or the purification which he
needed. Ultimately,if after many trials purity was
not attained, then the wicked and incurable soul
underwent a final sentence at the hands of Osiris,
Judge of the Dead, and being condemned to annihila-
tion, was destroyed upon the steps of heaven by Shu,
EGYPTIAN MORALITY. 4t
the Lord of Light. The good soul, having first been
completely cleansed of its impurities by passing
through the basin of purgatorial fire guarded by the
four ape-faced geni , was made the companion of Osiris
for a period of three thousand years ; after which it
returned from Amenti, re-entered its former body,
and lived once more a human life upon the earth
The process was repeated till a mystic number of
years had gone by, when, finally, the blessed attained
the crowning joy of union with God, being absorbed
into the Divine Essence, from which they had ema-
nated, and thus attaining the true end and full
perfection of their being.
Such a belief as this, if earnest and thorough,
should be productive of a high standard of moral
action; and undoubtedly the Egyptians had a code
of morality that will compare favourably with that of
most ancient nations. It has been said to have
contained “ three cardinal requirements—love of God,
love of virtue, and love of man.” ‘The hymns suffi-
ciently indicate the first ; the second may be allowed,
if by “virtue” we understand justice and truth ; the
third is testified by the constant claim of men, in their
epitaphs, to have been benefactors of their species. “I
‘was not an idler,” says one; “I was no listener to the
counsels of sloth; my name was not heard in the
place of reproof . .. all men respected me; I gave
water to the thirsty; I set the wanderer on his path
T took away the oppressor, and put a stop to violence.
“I myself was just and true,” writes another : “without
malice, having put God in my heart, and being quick
to discern His will. Ihave done good upon earth:
42 THE PEOPLE OP EGYPP.
T have harboured no prejudice; I have not been
vicked; I have not approved of any offence ot
‘quity; I have taken pleasure in speaking the
truth. ... Pure is my soul; while living I bore no
malice. There are no errors attributable to me ; no
sins of mine are before the judges. . . The men of
the future, while they live, will be charmed by my re-
markable merits” And another: I have not oppressed
any widow; no prisoner languished in my days; no
cone died of hunger. When there were years of famine,
I had my fields ploughed. 1 gave food to the in-
habitants, so that there was no hungry person. I
gave the widow an equal portion with the married5
T did not prefer the rich to the poor.”
‘The moral standard thus set up, though satisfactory,
so far as it went, was in many respects deficient. Tt
did not comprise humility ; it scarcely seems to have
comprised purity. The religious sculptures of the
Egyptians were grossly indecent ; their religious fes-
ivals were kept in an indecent way; phallic orgies
were a part of them, and phallic orgies of a gross
kind. The Egyptians tolerated incest, and could de-
fend it by the example of the gods. Osiris had married
his sister; Khem was “the Bull of his mother.”
The Egyptian novelettes are full of indecency and
morality, and Egyptian travellers describe thei
amours very much in the spirit of Ferdinand, Count
Fathom ; moreover, the complacency with which
each Egyptian declares himself on his tomb to have
possessed every virtue, and to have been free from
all vices, is most remarkable, “I was a good man
before the king; I saved the population in the dire
DIVISIONS OF socrETY. B.
calamity which befell all the land ; I shielded the weak
against the strong; I did all good things when the
time came to do them; I was pious towards my
father, and did the will of my mother ; T was kind-
hearted towards my brethren...I made a good
sarcophagus for him who had no coffin. When the
dire calamity befell the land, I made the children to
live, I established the houses, I did for them all such
good things as a father does for his sons.”
And, notwithstanding all this braggadocio, per-
formance seems to have lagged sadly behind profes.
Kings boast of slaying their unresisting prisoners
with their own hand, and represent themselvesin the
act of doing so. ‘They come back from battle with
the gory heads of their slain enemies hanging from
theirchariots. Licentiousness prevailed in the palace,
‘and members of the royal harem intrigued with those
who sought the life of the king. A belief in magic
was general, and men endeavoured to destroy or inj
those whom they hated by wasting their waxen effigies
at a slow fire to the accompani nent of incantations.
Thieves were numerous, and did not scruple even to
violate the sanctity of the tomb in order to obtain
a satisfactory booty. A famous “thieves! society,”
formed for the purpose of opening and plundering
the royal tombs, contained among its members persons
of the sacerdotal order.
Social ranks in Egypt were divided somewhat
sharply. ‘Therewas a large class of nobles, who were
mostly great landed proprietors living on their estates,
and having under them a vast body of dependents,
servants, labourers, artizans, &c. ‘There was also a
44 THE PEOPLE OF EGYPR.
numerous official class, partly employed at the court,
partly holding government posts throughout the
country, which regarded itself as highly dignified,
nd looked down de haut en bas on “the people.”
‘Commands in the army seem to have been among
the prizes which from time to time fell to the lot of
such persons. uurther, there was a literary class,
which was eminently respectable, and which viewed
with contempt those who were engaged in trade or
handicrafts
Below these three classes, and removed from them
by a long interval, was the mass of the population—
the multitude ” as the Egyptians called them. ‘These
ced in manual labour of different
‘The greater number were employed on the
farms of the nobles, in the cultivation of the soil o
the rearing of cattle. A portion were boatmen,
fishermen, or fowlers. Others pursued the various
Known handicrafts. They were weavers, workers in
‘metal, stone-cutters, masons, potters, carpenters, up-
holsterers, tailors, shoe-makers, glass-blowers, boat-
builders, wig-makers, and embalmers. There were
also among them painters and sculptors. But all
these employments “stank” in the nostrils of the
upper classes, and were regarded as unworthy of any
‘one who wished to be thought respectable.
Still, the line of demarcation, decided as wa
might be crossed. It is an entire mistake to suppose
that caste existed in Egypt. Men frequently bred up,
their sons to their own trade or profession, as they do
in al countries, but they were not obliged to do so—
there was absolutely no compulsion in the matter
CONDITION OF THE LOWER ORDERS. 45
‘The “public-schools” of Egypt were open to all
comers, and the son of the artizan sat on the same
bench with the son of the noble, enjoyed the same
education, and had an equal opportunity of dis.
tinguishing himself. If he showed sufficient promise,
he was recommended to adopt the literary life; and
the literary life was the sure passport to State employ
ment, State employment once entered upon, merit
secured advancement; and thus there was, in fact, no
obstacle to prevent the son ofa labouring man from
rising to the very highest positions in the administra-
tion of the empire. Successful ministers were usually
rewarded by large grants of land from the royal
domain ; and it follows that a clever youth of the
labouring class might by good conduct andability make
his way even into the ranks of the landed aristocracy.
On the other hand, practically, the condition of the
labouring class was, generally speaking a hard and
sad one. The kings were entitled to employ as many
of their subjects as they pleased in forced labours, and
monarchs often sacrificed to their inordinate vanity the
lives and happiness of thousands. Private employers
of labour were frequently cruel and exacting; their
overseers used the stick, and it was not easy for those
who suffered to obtain any redress. Moreover, taxation
was heavy, and y to satisfy the collector sub-
jected the defaulter to the bastinado. ‘Those who
have studied the antiquities of Egypt with most care,
tell us that there was not much to choose between
the condition of the ancient labourers and that of the
unhappy fella/tin * of the present day.
+ A fel ah isa peasant, one ofthe labo g las, jst above the slave,
mt
THE DAWN OF HISTORY,
ALL nations, unless they be colonies, have a pre-
hi toric time—a dark period of mist and gloom,
before the keen light of history dawns upon them.
This period is the favourite playground of the myth-
spirits, where they disport themselves freely, or lounge
heavily and fistlessly, according to their different
natures, The Egyptian spirits were of the heavier
and duller kind—not light and frolicsome, like the
Greek and the Indo-Iranian, It has been said that
pt never produced more than one myth, the
in no other
the story told at iderable length, or
with considerable number of exciting incidents,
There are, however, many short legends in the
yptian remains, which have more or less of interest,
and show that the people was not altogether devoid
of imagination, though their imagination was far from
lively. Seb, for instance, once upon a time, took the
form of a goose, and laid the mundane egg, and
hatched it. ‘Thoth once wrote a wonderful book, full
of wisdom and science, which told of everything con.
cerning the fowls of the air, and the fishes of the sea,
and the four-footed beasts of the earth. He who knew
EGYPTIAN MYTHS. 47
a single page of the book could charm the heaven, the
earth, the great abyss, the mountains, and the seas
Thoth took the work and enc in a box of gold,
and the box of gold he placed within a box of silver,
and the silver box within a box of ivory and ebony,
and that again within a box of bronze ; and the bronze
box he enclosed within a box of brass, and the brass
box within a box of iron; and the box, thus guarded,
he threw into the Nile at Coptos. But a priest
discovered the whereabouts of the book, and sold the
knowledge toa young noble fora hundred pieces of
silver, and the young noble with great trouble fished
the book up. But the possession of the book brought
him not good but evil. He lost his wife ; he lost his
child ; he became entangled in a disgraceful intrigu
He was glad to part with the book. But the next,
possessor was not more fortunate ; the book brought
him no luck. ‘The quest after unlawful knowledge
involved all who sought it in calamity.
Another myth had for its subject the proposed
destruction of mankind by Ra, the Sun-god. Ra
had succeeded Phthah as king of Egypt, and had
reigned for a long term of years in peace, contented
with his subjects and they with him. But a time
came when they grew headstrong and unruly ; they
uttered words against Ra ; they plotted evil thing:
they grievously offended him. So Ra called the council
of the gods together and asked them to advise him
what he should do. They said mankind must be
destroyed, and committed the task of destruction to
Athor and Sekhet, who proceeded to smite the men
over the whole land. But now fear came upon,
THE DAWN OP HISTORY.
and the men of Elephantine made haste,
juice from the best of their fruits,
nd mingled it with human blood, and filled seven
thousand jars, and brought them as an offering to
the offended god. Ra drank and was content, and
ordered the liquor that remained in the jars to be
poured out; and, lo! it was an inundation which
covered the whole land of Egypt; and when Athor
went forth the next day to destroy, she saw no men
in the fields, but only water, which she drank,
pleased her, and she went away satisfied.
Tt would require another Euhemerus to find any.
groundwork of history in these narratives. We must
turn away from the “shadow-land” which the Egyptians
called the time of the gods on earth, if we would find
trace of the real doings of men in the Nile valley,
and put before our readers actual human beings in
the place of airy phantoms. The Egyptians the
selves taught that the first man of whom they had
any record was a king called M’na, a name which the
Greeks represented by Mén or Menes. M’na was
born at Tena (This or Thinis) in Upper Egypt,
where his ancestors had borne sway before him. He
was the first to master the Lower country, and thus
to unite under a single sceptre the “two Egypts”.
the long narrow Nile valley and the broad Delta
plain. Having placed on his head the double crown
which thenceforth symbolized dominion over both
tracts, his first thought was that a new capital was
needed. Egypt could not, he felt, be ruled conve-
niently from the latitude of Thebes, or from any site
in the Upper country; it required a capital which
SUPPOSED FIRST KING. 49.
should abut on both regions, and so command both.
Nature pointed out one only fit locality, the junction
of the plain with the vale—* the balance of the two
as the Egyptians called it ; the place where
Upper Country” terminates, and Egypt
‘opens out into the wide smiling plain that thence
spreads itself on every side to the sea. Hence there
would be easy access to both regions; both would
be, in a way, commanded; here, too, was a readily
defensible position, one assailable only in front.
perience has shown that the instinct of the first founder
was right, or that his political and strategic foresight
was extraordinary. ‘Though circumstances, once
and again, transferred the seat of government to
‘Thebes or Alexandria, yet such removals were short
lived. The force of geographic fact was too strong to
be permanently overcome, and after a few centuries
power gravitated back to the centre pointed out by
nature,
If we may believe the tradition, there was, when
the idea of building the new capital arose, a difficulty
in obtaining a site in all respects advantageous. The
Nile, before debouching upon the plain, hugged for
many miles the base of the Libyan hills, and was thus
‘on the wrong side of the valley. It was wanted on
the other side, in order to be a water-bulwark against
an Asiatic invader. The founder, therefore, before
building his city, undertook a gigantic work. He
raised a great embankment across the natural course
of the river ; and, forcing it from its bed, made it
enter a new channel and run midway down the valley
or, if anything, rather towards its eastern side, He
50 THE DAWN OF HISTORY.
thus obtained the bulwark against invasion that he
required, and he had an ample site for his capital
between the new channel of the stream and the foot
of the western hills.
It is undoubtedly strange to hear of such a work
being constructed at the very dawn of history, by a
population that was just becominga people. But in
Egypt precocity is the rule—a Minerva starts full-
grown from the head of Jove. ‘The pyramids them-
selves cannot be placed very long after the supposed,
reign of Menes; and the engineering skill implied in
the pyramids is simply of a piece with that attributed,
to the founder of Memphis
In ancient times a city was nothing without a
temple; and the capital city of the most religious,
people in the world could not by any possibility lack,
that centre of civic life which its chief temple always
was to every ancient town. Philosophy must settle
the question how it came to pass that religious ideas
‘were in ancient times so universally prevalent and so
strongly pronounced. History is only bound to note
the fact. Coeval, then, with the foundation of the
city of Menes was, according to the tradition, the
erection of a great temple to Phthah— the Revealer.”
the Divine artificer, by whom the world and mar
were created, and the hidden thought of the remote
Supreme Being was made manifest to His creatures.
Phthah’s temple lay within the town, and was ori-
ginallya naos or “cell,” a single building probably
not unlike that between the Sphinx’s paws at Ghizeh,,
situated within a femenos, or “sacred enclosure,”
watered from the river, and no doubt planted with
MEMPHIS AND ITS TEMPLE. 5
trees, Like the medieval cathedrals, the building
lapse of centuries, great kings continu-
adding new structures to the edifice, and
enriching it with statuary and pai Herodotus
saw it in its full glory, and calls it “a vast edifice,
very worthy of commemoration.” Abd-el-Latif saw
it in its decline, and notes the beauty of its remains:
“the great monolithic shrine of breccia verde, nine
cubits high, cight long,and seven broad, the doorswhich
swung on hinges of stone, the well-carven statues, and
the lions terrific in their aspect.”* At the present
day scarcely a trace remains. One broken colossus
of the Great Ramesses, till very recently prostrate, and
a few nondescript fragments, alone continue on the
spot, to attest to moderns the position of that antique
fane, which the Egyptians themselves regarded as,
the oldest in their land.
The new city received from its founder the name
of Men-nefer—“ the Good Abode.” It was alse
known as Ei-Ptah—“the House of Phthah.” From
the former name came the prevailing appellations—
the “Memphis” of the Grecks and Romans, the
“Moph” of the Hebrews, the * Mimpi” of the Assy-
jans, and the name still given to the ruins, “ Tel
Monf.” It was indeed a “ good abode ”—watered by,
an unfailing stream, navigable from the sea, which at
once brought it supplies and afforded it a strong pro
tection, surrounded on three sides by the richest anc
‘most productive alluvium, close to quarries of excel-
ent stone, warm in winter, fanned by the cool norther
breezes in the summer-time, within easy reach of the
* R, Stuart Pool, “ Cities of Egypt,” pp. 24 25.
sea, yet not so near as to attract the cupidity of
pirates. Few capitals have been more favourably
placed. It was ble that when the old town
went to ruins, a new one should spring up in its
stead. Memphis still e: ists, ina ertain sense, in the
glories of the modern Cairo, which occupies an ad-
jacent site, and is composed largely of the same
materials.
The Egyptians knew no more of their first king
than that he turned the course of the Nile, founded
Memphis, built the nucleus of the great temple of
Phthah, and “was devoured by a hippopotamus.”
This last fact is related with al due gravit
Manetho, notwithstanding that the hippopotamus
is agraminivorous animal, one that “eats grass like
an ox” (Job xi. 15). Probably the old Egyptian
writer whom he followed meant that M’na at last fell
a victim to Taourt, the Goddess of Evil, to whom the
hippopotamus was sacred, and who was herself figured
as a hippopotamus erect. This would be merely
equivalent to relating that he succumbed to death.
Manetho gave him a reign of sixty-two years
The question is asked by the modern crities, who
will take nothing on trust, “ Have we in Menes a real
Egyptian, a being of flesh and blood, one who truly
lived, breathed, fought, built, ruled, and at last died ?
Or are we still dealing with a phantom, as much as
when we spoke of Seb, and Thoth, and Osiris, and Set,
and Horus?” The answer seems to be, that we can-
not tell. ‘The Egyptians believed in Menes as a man;
they placed him at the head of their dynastic lists;
but they had no contemporary monument to show
ANA AND HIS SUCCESSORS. 33
inscribed with his name. A name like that of Menes
is found at the beginning of things in so many
nations, that on that account alone the word would
be suspicious; in Greece it is Minos, in Phrygia
Manis, in Lydia Manes, in India Menu, in Germany
Mannus. And again, the name of the founder is so
like that of the city which he founded, that another
suspicion —Have we not here one of the ma
instances of a personal name made out of a local one,
as Nin or Ninus from Nineveh (Ninna), Romulus
from Roma, and the like 2 Probably we shall do
best to acquiesce in the judgment of Dr Birch
“Menes must be placed among those founders of
monarchies whose personal a ere and
enlightened criticism doubts or de
‘The ci was, however, a reality, the emb ment
was a reality, the temple of Phthah was a reality, and
the founding of a kingdom in Egypt, which included
both the Upper and the Lower country some con-
siderable time before the date of Abraham, was a
reality, which the sternest criticism need not—nay,
cannot—doubt. All antiquity attests that the valley
of the Nile was one of the first seats of civilization,
Abraham found a settled government established
there when he visited the country, and a consecutive
ries of monuments carries the date of the first
civilization at least as far back as B.C. 2700—probably
further.
If the great Menes, then, notwithstanding all that
we are told of his doings, be a mere shadowy person-
age, little more than magni nominis umbra, what
shall we say of his twenty or thirty successors of the
first, second, and third dynasties? What but that
they are shadows of shadows? The native monuments
of the early Ramesside period (about B.C. 1400-1300)
assign to this time some twenty-five names of kings;
but they do not agree in their order, nor do they
altogether agree in the names. ‘The kings, if they
were kings, have left_no history—we can only by
cojecture attach to them any particular buildi
we can give no account of their actions, we can
ussign no chronology to their reigns. They are of no
more importance in the “story of Egypt” than the
Alban kings in the “story of Rome.” * Non ragionam
di loro, ma guarda e passi.”
‘The first living, breathing, acting, flesh-and-blood
personage, whom so-called histories of Egypt present,
to us, is a certain Sneferu, or Seneferu, whom the
Egyptians seem to have regarded as the first monarch
of their fourth dynasty. Sneferu—called by Manetho,
we know not why, Soris—has left us a representation
of himself, and an inscription. On the rocks of
Wady Magharah, in the Sinaitic peninsula, may be
seen to this day an incised tablet representing the
monarch in the act of smiting an enemy, whom he
holds by the hair of his head, with a mace. The
action is apparently emblematic, for at the side we
see the words Ta satu, “ Smiter of the nations ;” and
it is a fair explanation of the tablet, that its intention
was to signify that the Pharaoh in question had re-
duced to subjection the tribes which in his time in-
habited the Sinaitic regions. The motive of the
attack was not mere lust of conquest, but rather the
desire of gain. The Wady Magharah contained
SNEFERU, THE PIRST CERPAIN KING. 33
mines of copper and of turquoise, which the Egyptians
desired to work ; and for this purpose it was necessary
to hold the country by a set of military posts, in
order that the miners might pursue their labours
without molestation, Some ruins of the fortifications
are still to be seen ; and the mines themselves, now
exhausted, pierce the sides of the rocks, and bear in
many places traces of hieroglyphical inscriptions.

The remains of temples show that the expatriated
colonists were not left without the consolations of
religion, while a deep well indicates the care that was
taken to supply their temporal needs. Thousands of
stone arrow-heads give evidence of the presence of a
strong garrison, and make us acquainted with the
weapon which they found most effectual against their
enemies
feru calls himself Neter aa, “the Great God,”
and Neb mat, “the Lord of Justice.” Heis also “the
Golden Horus,” or “the Conqueror.” Neb mat is not
a usual title with Egyptian monarchs ; and its as-
sumption by Sneferu would seem to mark, at any
rate, his appreciation of the excellence of justice, and
is desire to have the reputation of a just ruler.
ater ages give him the title of “the beneficent king,”
so that he would seem to have been a really unselfish
and kindly sovereign. His form, however, only just
emerges from the mists of the period to be again
concealed from our view, and we vainly ask ourselves
what exactly were the benefits that he conferred on
Egypt, so as to attain his high reputation,
Still, the monuments of his time are sufficient to
tell us something of the Egypt of his day, and of the
amount and character of the civilization so early
attained by the F people, Besides his own
tablet in the Wady Magharah, there are in the
neighbourhood of the pyramids of Ghizch a number
of tombs which belong to the officials of his court
and the members of his family. These tombs contain
both sculptures and inscriptions, and throw consider-
able light on the condition of the country.
In the first place, it is apparent that the style of
writing has been invented which is called hiero-
glyphical, and which has the appearance of a picture
writing, though it is almost as absolutely phonetic as
any other, Setting apart a certain small number of
“determinatives,” cach sign stands for a sound—the
CIVILIZATION OF SNEFERU'S TIME. 57
reater part for those elementary sounds which we
express by letters. An eagle is a,a leg and foot 4,
a horned serpent f,a hand ¢, an owl , a chicken x,
and the like. It is true that there are signs which
express a compound sound, a whole word, even a
word of two syllables. A bowl or basin represents
the sound of ned, a hatchet that of eter, a guitar that
of afer, a crescent that of al, and so on. Secondly,
is clear that artistic power is considerable. The
animal forms used in the hicroglyphics—the bee, the
vulture, the uraeus, the hawk, the chicken, the eagle
are well drawn, In the human forms there is less
merit, but still they are fairly well proportioned and
have spirit, No rudeness or want of finish attaches
cither-to the writing or to the drawing of Sneferu’s
times the artists do not attempt much, but what they
attempt they accomplish.
Next, we may notice the character of the tombs.
Already the tomb was more important than the
house; and while every habitation constructed for the
living men of the time has utterly perished, scores of
the dwellings assigned to the departed still exist,
many in an excellent condition. They are stone
buildings resembling small houses, each with its door
of entrance, but with no windows, and forming
internally a small chamber generally decorated with
sculptures. The walls slope at an angle of seventy-
five or eighty degrees externally, but in the interior
are perpendicular. The roof is composed of large
flat stones. Strictly speaking, the chambers are not
actual tombs, but mortuary chapels. The embalmed
body of the deceased, encased in its wooden coffin
38 THe DAWN OF mISTORY.
(Gen. 1, 26), was not deposited in the chamber, but in.
an excavation under one of the walls, which was
carefully closed up after the coffin had been placed
inside it. ‘The chamber was used by the relations for
sacred rites, sacrificial feasts, and the like, held in
honour of the deceased, especially on the anniversary
of his death and entrance into Amenti. The early
Egyptians indulged, like the Chinese, in a worship of
ancestors. The members of a family met from time
to time in the sepulchral chamber of their father, oF
their grandfather, and went through various cere-
monies, sang hymns, poured libations, and made
s, which were regarded as pleasing to the
departed, and which secured their protection and
help to such of their descendants as took part in the
pious practices.
Sometimes a tomb was more pretentious than those
above described. ‘There is an edifice at Meydoum,
improperly termed a pyramid, which is thought to be
older than Sneferu, and was probably erected by one
of the “shadowy kings” who preceded him on the
throne, Situated on a natural rocky knoll of some
considerable height, itrises in three stages at an angle
of 74° 10 to an elevation of a hundred and twent
five feet. It is built of a compact limestone, which
must have been brought from some distance. ‘The
first stage has a height alittle short of seventy feet;
the next excecds thirty-two feet; the thicd is a little
over twenty-two feet. It is possible that originally
there were more stages, and probable that the present
highest stage has in part crumbled away; so that we
may fairly reckon the original height have been
PyRAMID OF MEYDOUM. 39
between a hundred and forty and a hundred and fifty
fect. The monument is generally regarded asa tomb,
from situation in the Memphian necropolis and its
remote resemblance to the pyramids ; but as yet it
has not been penetrated, and consequently has not
been proved to have been sepulchral
A construction, which has even a greater appear-
ance of antiquity than the Meydoum tower, exists at
Saccarah. Here the architect carried up a monument

to the height of two hundred feet, by constructing it in
six or seven sloping stages, having an angle of 73° 30
‘The core of his building was composed of rubble, but
this was protected on every side by a thick casing of
limestone roughly hewn, and apparently quarried on
the spot. The sepulchral intention of the construction,
is unquestionable. Tt covered a. spacious chamber
excavated in the rock, whercon the monument was
built, which, when first discovered, contained a sareo-
phagus and was lined with slabs of granite, Carefully
concealed passages connected the chamber with the
outer world, and allowed of its being entered by
those in possession of the “secrets of the prison-
house.” In this structure we have, no doubt, the
tomb of aking more ancient than Sneferu—though
for our own part we should hesitate to assign the
‘monument to one king rather than another.
If we pass from the architecture of the period to
its social condition, we remark that grades of society
already existed, and were as pronounced as in later
times. The kings were already deities, and treated
with superstitious regard. ‘The state-officials were a
highly privileged class, generally more or less con
neeted with the royal family. The land was partly
owned by the king (Gen. xIvii. 6), who employed his
‘own labourers and herdsmen upon it; partly, mainly
pethaps, it was in the hands of great landed propri
tors—nobles, who lived in country houses upon thei
estates, maintaining large houscholds, and giving em-
ployment to scores of peasants, herdsmen, artizans,
huntsmen, and fishermen. The “lower orders” were
of very little account. They were at the beck and
call of the landed aristocracy in the country districts,
of the state-officials in the towns. Above all, the
monarch had the right of impressing them into his
service whenever he pleased, and employing them in
the “ great works” by which he strove to perpetuate
his name.
‘There prevailed, however, a great simplicity of man-
ners. The dress of the upper classes was wonderfully
THE GREAT PYRAMID OF SACCARAH. 61
plain and unpretending, presenting little variety and
scarcely any omament. The grandee wore, indeed, an.
elaborate wig, it being imperative on all men to shave
the head for the sake of cleanliness. But otherwise.

his costume was of the simplest and the scantiest.
Ordinarily, when he was employed in the common
duties of life, a short tunic, probably of white linen,
reaching from the waist to a little above the knee,
was his sole garment. His arms, chest, legs, even h
fect, were naked ; for sandals, not to speak of stoc!
ings or shoes, were unknown, The only decoration,
which he wore was a chain or riband round the neck,
to which was suspended an ornament like a locket—
probably an amulet. In his right hand he carried a
long staff or wand, either for the purpose of be-~
labouring his inferiors, or else to use it as a walking-
stick. On special occasions he made, however, a
more elaborate toilet. Doffing his linen tunic, he
clothed himself in a single, somewhat scanty, robe,
which reached from the neck to the ankles; and
having exchanged his chain and locket for a broad,
collar, and adorned his wrists with bracelets, he was
ready to pay visits or to receive company. He had,
no carriage, so far as appears, not even a palang
no horse to ride, nor even a mule or adonkey. ‘The
great men of the East rode, in later times, on “ white
asses” (Judges v. 10) ; the Egyptian of Sneferu’s age
had to trudge to court, or to make calls upon his
friends, by the sole aid of those means of locomotion
which nature had given hi
Women, who in most civilized countries claim to
themselves far more elaboration in dress and variety
of ornament than men, were content, in the Egypt of
which we are here speaking, with a costume, and a
personal decoration, scarcely less simple than that of
their husbands. The Egyptian materfamilias of the
time wore her hair long, and gathered into thr
ma:ses, one behind the head, and the other two in
front of either shoulder. Like her spouse, she had,
STATUARY OF SNEPERU'S TIME. 63,
but a single garment—a short gown or petticoat
reaching from just below the breasts to half way down
the calf of the leg, and supported by two broad straps
passed over the two shoulders. She exposed her
arms and bosom to sight, and her feet were bare, like
her husband's. Her only ornaments were bracelets.
There was no seclusion of women at any time
among the ancient Egyptians. The figure of the
on the early monuments constantly accompanies that
of her husband. She is his associate in all his oc-
cupations. Her subordination is indicated by her
representation being on an unduly smaller scale, and,
by her ordinary position, which is behind the figure of
her ord and master.” In statuary, however, she
appears ted with him on the same seat or chair
There is no appear been either a
drudge or a plaything. She was regarded as man’s
true“ helpmate,” shared his thoughts, ruled his family,
and during their early years had the charge of his
children, Polygamy was unknown in Egypt during
the primitive period ; even the kings had then but
‘one wife, Sneferu’s wife was a certain Mertitefs, who
bore him a son, Nefer-mat, and after his death became
the wife of his successor. Women were entombed
with as much care, and almost with as much pomp,
as men, Their right to ascend the throne is said to
have been asserted by one of the kings who pre-
ceded Sneferu ; and from time to time women actually
exercised in Egypt the royal authority.
Iv.
‘THE PYRAMID BUILDERS.
a European, or an American, whe
pt, to realize the conception of a
the pyramidal form has gone en-
ly out of use as an architectural type of mom
mental perfection ; nay, even as an architectural
embellishment. It maintained an honourable position
in architecture from its first discovery to the time of
the Maccabee kings (1 Mac. xi, 28) ; but, never having
been adopted by either the Greeks or the Romans, it
passed into desuetude in the Old World with the
conquest of the East by the West. In the New
World it was found existent by the early discoverers,
and then held a high place in the regards of the native
race which had reached the furthest towards eiviliza-
tion; but Spanish bigotry looked with horror on
everything that stood connected with an idolatrous
religion, and the pyramids of Mexico were first
wantonly injured, and then allowed to fall into such
astate of decay, that thei 1 form is by some
questioned. A visit to the plains of Teotihuacan
will not convey to the mind which is a blank on the
subject the true conception of a great pyramid. It
requires a pilgrimage to Ghizeh or Saccarah, or a
66 THE PyRaMiD BUILDE!
lively and swell-instructed imagination, to enable a
man to call up before his mind’s eye the true
form and appearance and impressiveness of such a,
structure.
Lord Houghton endeavoured to give expression to
the feelings of one who sees for the first time these
wondrous, these incomprehensible creations in the
following lines:
Alice the fantasies of many aight,
Aer the deep destes of manya day,
gjoicing as an anci i Eremite
Upon the deserts edge at last Tay
Before me ros, in onvlerfal aay,
“Those works where man has rivalled Nature most
™ © Pyramid fear no more decay
‘Than waves inflict upon the rockist coast,
(+ winds on mountain-steeps, and lke endurance boasts
Fragments the deluge of old Time bas left
Behind in is subsidence—tong long walls
(Of cities of thee very names beret,
‘Lone columns, remnants of majeike halls
Rich tracried chambers, where the night-dew fll—
‘All have [seen with feelings de, T trom,
‘Yetnot with sich as these memorials
{OF the great untemembere, that eam show
‘The mass and shape they wore four thousand years ago,
‘The Egyptian idea of a pyramid was that uf a
structure on a square base, with four inclining. sid
cach one of which should be an equilateral triangle, all,
meeting in a point at the top. The structure might,
be solid, and in that case might be cither of hewn
stone throughout, or consist of a mass of rubble
merely held together by an external casing of stone ;
nt contain chambers and passages, in which
case the employment of rubble was scarcely possible,
THE THREE PYRAMIDS OF GHIZEH. 67
Tthas been demonstrated by actual excavation, that
all the great pyramids of Egypt were of the latter
character—that they were built for the express pur-
pose of containing chambers and passages, and of,
preserving those chambers and passages intact. They
required, therefore, to be, and in most cases are, of@
good construction throughout.
‘There are from sixty to seventy pyramids in Egypt.
chiefly in the neighbourhood of Memphis Some of
them are nearly perfect, some more or less in rui
but most of them still preserving their ancient shape
when seen from afar. Two of them greatly exceed
all the others in their dimensions, and are appropriately
designated as “ the Great Pyramid” and “ the Second
Pyramid ° A thiedin their immediate vicinity is of
very inferior size, and scarcely deserves the pre-emin-
ence which has been conceded to it by the designation
of “the Third Pyramid”
Still, the three seem all of them, to deserve descrip
tion, and to challenge a place in “the story of Egypt,”
ever yet been told without some account
narvels of each of them. ‘The smallest of the
three was a square of three hundred and fifty-four fect
cach way, and had a height of two hundred and
cighteen feet. It covered an area of two acres, three
roods, and. tiventy-one poles, or about that of an or-
dinary London square, ‘The cubic contents amounted
to above nine million fect of solid masonry, and are
caleulated to have weighed 702,460 tons. The height
was not very impressive. Two hundred and twenty
feet is an altitude attained by the towers of many
churches, and the “Pyramid of the Sun” at Teotihuae
68 THE PYRAMID BUILDERS.
can did not fall much short of it ; but the mass was
immense, the masonry excellent, and the in-
genuity shown in the construction was great. Sunk
the rock from which the pyramid rose, was a series
of sepulchral chambers. One, the largest, almost
directly under the apex of the pyramid, was empty.
In another, which had an arched roof, constructed in
the most careful and elaborate way, was found the
sarcophagus of the king, Men-kau-ra, to whom tradi-
tion assigned the building, formed of a single mass of
blue-black basalt, exquisitely polished and beautifully
carved, externally eight feet long, three feet high, and
three feet broad, internally six feet by two. In the
sarcophagus was the wooden coffin of the monarch,
and on the lid of the coffin was his name. The
chambers were connected by two long passages with
the open air ; and another passage had, apparently,
been used for the same purpose before the pyramid
attained its ultimate size. ‘The tomb-chamber, though.
carved in the rock, had been paved and lined with
slabs of solid stone, which were
rock by iron cramps. ‘The weight of the sarcophagus
which it contained, now unhappily lost, was three tons.
‘The “ Second Pyramid,” which stands to the north-
‘east of the Third, at the distance of about two hundred
and seventy yards, was a square of seven hundred and
seven fect cach way, and thus covered an area of
almost eleven acres and a half, or nearly double that
of the greatest building which Rome ever produc»d—
the Coliseum, The sides rose at an angle of 52° to!
and the perpendicular height was four hundred and
fifty-four feet, or fifty fect more than that of the spire
MASS OF THE SECOND PYRAMID. aa
of Salisbury Cathedral. The cubie contents are
‘estimated at 71,670,000 feet; and their weight is cal-
culated at 5,309,000 tons. Numbers of this vast
amount convey but little idea of the reality to an
‘ordinary reader, and require to be made intelligible
by comparisons, Suppose, then,a solidly built stone
house, with walls a foot thick, twenty fect of frontage,
and thirty fe t of depth from front to back ; let the
walls be twenty-four feet high and have a foundation
of six fect; throw in party-walls to one-third. the
extent of the main walls—and the result will be a
building containing four thousand cubie fect of
masonry. Let there be a town of eighteen thousand
such houses, suited to be the abode of a hundred
thousand inhabitants—then pull these houses to
pieces, and pile them up into a heap to a_height
exceeding that of the spire of the Cathedral of Vienna,
and you will have a rough representation of the
“Second Pyramid of Ghizeh.” Or lay down the
‘contents of the structure in a line a foot in breadth
and depth—the line would be above 13,500 miles long,
and would reach more than half-way round the earth
at the equator. Again, suppose that a single man
can quarrya ton of stone in a week, then it would
have required above twenty thousand to be employed
constantly for five years in order to obtain the
material for the pyramid; and if the blocks were
required to be large, the number employed and the
‘time occupied would have had to be greater.
The internal construction of the “Second Pyramid ”
is less elaborate than that of the Third, but not very
different. Two passages lead from the outer air to a
sepulchral chamber almost exactly under the apex of
the pyramid, and exactly at its base, one of them
commencing abo t fifty fect from the base midway
the north side, and the other commencinga little
outside the base, in the pavement at the foot of the
pyramid. ‘The first passage was carried through the
substance of the pyramid for a distance of a hundred
and ten feet at a descending angle of 25° 53/, after
which it became horizontal, and was tunnelled through
thenative rock on which the pyramid was built. The
second passage was wholly in the rock. It began
with a descent at an angle of 21° 4o’, which continued
for a hundred feet; it was then horizontal for fifty
feet; after which it ascended gently for ninety-six
feet, and joined the first passage about midway
between the sepulchral chamber and the outer air.
The sepulchral chamber was carved mainly out of the
solid rock below the pyramid, but was roofed in by
some of the basement stones, which were sloped at an
‘The chamber measured forty-six feet in length
sxteen feet in breadth ; its height in the centre
t. It contained a plain granite
sarcophagus, without inscription of any kind,
feet and a half in length, three feet and a half in
breadth, and in depth three fe t. There was no coffin
in the sarcophagus at the time of its discovery, and
no inscription on any part of the pyramid or of its
contents. The tradition, however, which ascribed it
to the immediate predecessorof Men-kau-ra, may be
accepted as sufficient evidence of its author.
‘Come we now to the “Great Pyramid,” “which is,
still,” says Lenormant, “at least in respect of its mass,
aE
MCU
THE GREAT PYRAMID. 75
the most prodigious of all Iuman constructions.” The
Great Pyramid,” or “ First Pyramid of Ghizeh,” as it
is indifferently termed, is situated almost due north-
east of the “Second Pyramid,” at the distance of
about two hundred yards. The length of each side
at the base was originally seven hundred and si
four feet, or fifty-seven feet more than that of the
sides of the “Second Pyramid,” Its original per-
pendicular height was something over four hundred
and eighty fect, its cubic contents exceeded eighty-
ine million feet, and the weight of its mass 6,840,000
tons. In height it thus exceeded Strasburg Cathedral
by abovesix feet, St. Peter's at Rome by above thirty
feet, St. Stephen’s at Vienna by fifty feet, St. Paul's,
London, by a hundred and twenty feet, and the
Capitol at Washington by nearly two hundred feet.
Its area was thirteen acres, one rood, and twenty-two
poles, or nearly two acres more than the area of the
“Second Pyramid,” which was fourfold that of the
“Third Pyramid,” which, as we have seen, was that
of an ordinary London square. Its cubie contents
would build a city of twenty-two thousand such houses
as were above described, and laid in a line of cubic
squares would reach a distance of nearly seventeen
thousand miles, or girdle two-thirds of the earth's cir-
cumference at the equator. Herodotus says that its
construction required the continuous labour of a
hundred thousand men for the space of twenty years,
and moderns do not regard theestimate as exaggerated.
‘The “Great Pyramid” presents, moreover, many.
other marvels besides its size. First, there is the
massiveness of the blocks of which it is composed.
‘The basement stones are in many cases thirty fect
long by five feet high, and four or five wide: they
must contain from six hundred to seven hundred and
fifty cubic fect each, and weigh from forty-six to fifty-
seven tons. ‘The granite blocks which roof over the
upper sepulchral chamber are nearly nineteen feet
Jong, by two broad and from three to four deep. The
relieving stones above the same chamber, and those
of the entrance passage, are almost equally massive.

Generally the external blocks are of a size with which
modern builders scarcely ever venture to deal, though,
the massiveness diminishes as the pyramid is as-
cended. The bulk of the interior is, however, of
comparatively small stones; but even these are care-
fully hewn and squared,so as to fit together compactly.
Further, there are the passages, the long gallery,
THE GREAT PYRAMID. ”
the ventilation shafts, and the sepulchral chambers
all of them remarkable, and some of them simply
astonishing, The “Great Pyramid” guards three
chambers. One p in the rock, about a hundred
and twenty fe hy the n: surface of the
ground, and is placed al rectly below the apex
of thestructure. It measures forty-six feet by twenty-

seven, and is eleven feet high. The access to it is by
a long and narrow passage which commences in the
north side of the pyramid, about seventy feet above
the original base, and descends for forty yards through
the masonry, and then for seventy more in the same
line through the solid rock, when it changes its
direction, becoming horizontal for nine yards, and so
entering the chamber itself, The two ofher chambers
are reached by an ascending passage, which branches
off from the descending one at the distance of about
thirty yards from the entrance, and mounts up through
the heart of the pyramid for rather more than forty
yards, when it divides into two. A low horizontal
gallery, a hundred and ten feet long, leads to a
chamber which has been called “the Queen’s”—a room
about nineteen feet long by seventeen broad, roofed
in with sloping blocks, and having a height of twenty
feet in the centre. Another longer and much loftier
gallery continues on for a hundred and fifty feet in
the line of the ascending passage, and is then con-
nected by a short horizontal passage with the upper-
most or “King’s Chamber.” Here was found a
sarcophagus believed to be that of King Khufu, since
the name of Khufu was scrawled in more than one
place on the chamber walls,
The construction of this chamber—the very kernel
of the whole building —is exceedingly remarkable.
It is a room of thirty-four feet in length, witha width,
of seventeen feet, and a height of ninetec poset
wholly of granite blocks of great size, beau
polished, and fitted together with great care.
construction of the roof is particularly admirable.
First, the chamber is covered in with nine huge
blocks, each nearly nineteen feet long and four feet
wide, which are laid side by side upon the walls so as
to form a complete ceiling. Then above these blocks,
is a low chamber similarly covered in, and this is
GALLERY IN THE GREAT PYRAMID. — 81
repeated four times; after which there is a fifth
opening, triangular, and roofed in by a set of huge
sloping blocks, which meet at the apex and support
each other. The object is to relieve the chamber
from any superincumbent weight, and prevent it from
being crushed in by the mass of material above it;
and this object has been so completely attained that
still, at the expiration of above forty centuries, the
entire chamber, with its elaborate roof, remains intact,
without crack or settlement of any kind
Further, from the great chamber are carried two
ventilation-shafts, or air - passages, northwards and,
southwards, which open on the outer surface of the
pyramid, and are respectively two hundred and thirty
three and one hundred and ninety-four feet long.
These passages are square, or nearly so, and have @
diameter varying between six and nine inches. They
a continual supply of pure air to the chamber,
and keep it dr y at all seasons.
‘The Great allery is also of curious constructi
fending for ance of one hundred and fifty feet,
and rising at a angle of 26° 18’, it has a width of five
feet at the base and ah ht of above thirty feet. The
side walls are formed of seven layers of stone, each pro-
jecting a few inches over that below it.The gallery
thus gradually contracts towards the top, which has
width of four feet only, and is covered in with stones,
that reach across it, and rest on the walls at either side.
‘The exact object of so lofty a gallery has not been,
ascertained; but it must have helped to keep the air
of the interior pure and sweet, by increasing the space
through which it had to circulate,
82. THE PYRAMID BUILDERS.
‘The “Pyramid Builders,” or kings who constructed
the three monuments that have now been described,
were, according to a unanimous tradition, three con-
secutive monarchs, whose native names are read as
Khufu, Shafra, and Menkaura. These kings belonged
to Manetho’s fourth dynasty ; and Khufu, the first of
the three, seems to have been the immediate successor
speculations as to the objects which the builders had,
in view when they raised such magnificent constru
ns. One holds that the Great Pyramid, at any
rate, was built to embody cosmic discoveries, as the
exact length of the earth's diameter and circumfe-
rence, the length of an are of the meridian, and the
true unit of measure. Another believes the great
work of Khufu to have been an observatory, and the
ventilating passages to have been designed for “ tele-
scopes,” through which observations were to be made
upon the sun and stars ; but it has not yet been shown
that there is any valid foundation for these fancies,
which have been spun with much art out of the deli-
cate fabric of their propounders’ brains. The one hard
fact which rests upon abundant evidence is this—the
pyramids were built for tombs, to contain the mum.
mies of deceased Egyptians. ‘The chambers in their
interiors, at the time of their discovery, held within,
them sarcophagi, and in one instance the sarcophagus
had within it a coffin, ‘The coffin had an inscription,
upon it, which showed that it had once contained the
body of a king. If anything more is necessary, we
may add that every pyramid in Egypt—and there are,
as we have said, more than sixty of them—was built
PYRAMIDS NOT GRADUAL ACCRETIONS. 83
for the same purpose, and that they all occupy sites
in the great necropolis, or burial-ground opposite
Memphis, where the inhabitants are known to have
laid their dead.
‘The marvel is, how Khufu came suddenly to have
so magnificent a thought as that of constructing
edifice double the height of any previously exist
covering five times the area, and containing ten times
the mass, Architecture does not generally proceed,
by “leaps and bounds;” but here was a case of a
sudden extraordinary advance, such as we shall find
it difficult to parallel elsewhere. An attempt has
been made to solve the mystery by the supposition
that all pyramids were gradual accretions, and that
their size marks simply the length of a king’s reign,
ch making his sepulchral chamber, with a
mid above it, in his first year, and s his
reign went on, adding each year an outer coating; so
that the number of these coatings tells the length,
of his reign, as the age of a tre is known from the
number of its annual rings. In this case there would
have been nothing ideally great in the conception of
Khufu—he would simply have happened to erect the
biggest pyramid because he happened to have the
longest reign ; but, except in the case of the “ Third
Pyramid,” there is a unity of design in the structures
which implies that the architect had conceived the
whole structure in his mind from the first. The
lengths of the several parts are proportioned one to
another. In the “ Great Pyramid,” the main chamber
would not have needed the five relieving chambers
above it unless it was known that it would have to be
pressed down by a superincumbent mass, such as
actually lies upon it. Moreover, how is it possible
to conceive that in the later years of a decrepid
monarch, the whole of an enormous pyramid could be
coated over with huge blocks—and the blocks are
largest at the external surface—the work requiring
to be pushed each year with more vigour, as becoming
cach year greater and more difficult? Again, what
shall we say of the external finish? Each pyramid
‘was finally smoothed down to a uniform sloping sur-
face. ‘This alone must have been a work of years
id a pyramid builder leave it to his successor to
finish his pyramid? It is at least doubtful whether
any pyramid at all would ever have been finished had
he done so.
We must hold, therefore, that Khufu did suddenly
conceive a design without a parallel—did require his
architect to construct him a tomb, which should put
to shame all previous monuments, and should with
difficulty be surpassed, or even equalled. He must
have possessed much elevation of thought, and an
intense ambition, together with inordinate selfishness,
overweening p' de, and entire callousness to the
s of others before he could have approved
master-builder set before him.
‘That pla including the employment of huge blocks
of stone, their conv ince to the top of a hill a hun-
dred feet high, andtheir emplacement, in some cases,
at a further elevation of above 430 fect, involved,
under the circumstances of the time, such an amount
of human suffering, that no king who had any regard
for the happiness of his subjects could have consented
TYRANNY OF THE PYRAMID BUILDERS. 83
to it, Khufu must have forced his subjects to labour
for a long term of years—twenty, according to Hero-
dotus—at a servile work which was wholly unproduc-
tive, and was carried on amid their sighs and groans
for no object but his own glorification, and the sup-
posed safe custody of his remains. Shafra must have
done nearly the same. Hence an evil repute attached
to the pyramid builders, whose names were handed
down to posterity as those of evil-minded and impious
kings, who neglected the service of the gods to gratify
their own vanity, and, so long as they could exalt
themselves, did not care how much they oppressed
their people. ‘There was not even the poor apology,
for their conduct that their oppression fell on slaves,
or foreigners, or prisoners of war. Egypt was not
yeta conquering power; prisoners of war were few,
Slaves not very common. ‘The labourers whom the
pyramid builders employed were their own free sub-
jects whom they impressed into the heavy service,
It is by a just Nemesis that the kings have in a
great measure failed to secure the ends at which they
ed, and in hope of which they steeled their hearts
against their subjects’ cries. ‘They have indeed handed
down their names to a remote age : but it s as tyrants
and oppressors. ‘They are world-famous, or rather
world-infamous. But that preservation of their cor-
poreal frame which they especially sought, is exactly
what they have missed attaining,
Let nota monument give you oF me hopess
Since not a pinch of dust remains of Chedps,
says the doggerel of the satiric Byron ; and it is the
absolute fact that while thousands of mummies buried
in common graves remain untouched even to the
present day, the very grandeur of the pyramid
builders’ tombs attracted attention to them, caused
the monuments to be opened, the sareophagi to be
rifled, and the remains inclosed in them to be dis-
persed to the four winds of heave
Still, whatever gloomy associations attach to the
pyramids in respect of the sufferings caused by their
erection, as monuments they must always challenge
acertain amount of admiration. A great authority de-
clares: “ No one can possibly examine the interior of
the Great Pyramid without being struck with astonish-
‘ment at the wonderful mechanical skill displayed in its
construction. ‘The immense blocks of granite brought
from Syene, a distance of five hundred miles, polished
like glass, and so fitted that the joints can scarcely be
detected! Nothing can be more wonderful than the
extraordinary amount of knowledge displayed in the
construction of the discharging chambers over the
roof of the principal apartment, in the alignment of
the sloping galleries, in the provision of the ventilating,
shafts, and in all the wonderful contrivances of the
structure, Alll these, too, are carried out with such,
precision that, notwithstanding the immense super-
icumbent weight, no settlement in any part can be
detected to an appreciable fraction ofan inch. Nothing
more perfect mechanically has ever been erected since
that time” #
The architectural effect of the two greatest of the
pyramids is certainly magnificent. ‘They do not,
+ Fergusson, “History of Architecture,” vol. pp. 98, 92
IMPRESSIVENESS OF THE PYRAMIDS. 89
greatly impress the beholder at first sight, for a pyra~
mid, by the very law of its formation, never looks as
large as it is—it slopes away from the eye in every
direction, and cludes rather than courts observation,
But as the spec fator gazes, as he prolongs his exami-
nation and inspectior the pyramids gai upon him,
their impressiveness inereases. By the vastness of
their mass, by the impression of solidity and dura-
bility which they produce, partly also, perhaps, by
the symmetry and harmony of their lines and their
perfect simplicity and freedom from ornament, th
convey to the beholder a sense of grandeur and
majesty, they produce within him a fecling of aston-
ishment and awe, such as is scarcely caused by any
other of the erections of man, In all ages travellers
have felt and expressed the warmest admiration for
them. ‘They impressed Herodotus as no works that
he had seen elsewhere, except, perhaps, the Baby-
lonian. ‘They astonished Germanicus, familiar as he
was with the great constructio of Rome. They
furnished Napoleon with the telling phrase, “ Soldiers,
forty centuries look down upon you from the top of
the pyramids” Greece and Rome reckoned them,
among the Seven Wonders of the world. Moderns
have doubted whether they could really be the work
of human hands. If they possess only one of the
‘elements of architectural excellence, they possess that
clement to so great an extent that in respect of it
they are unsurpassed, and probably unsurpassable.
These remarks apply especially to the first and
second pyramids. The “Third” is not a work of
any very extraordinary grandeur, The bulk is not
greater than that of the chief pyramid of Saccarah,
which has never attracted much attention ; and the
height did not greatly exceed that of the chief Mexi-
can temple-mound., Moreover, the stones of which
the pyramid was composed are not excessively mas-
sive. The monument aimed at being beautiful rather
than grand, It was coated for half its height with
blocks of pink granite from Syene, bevelled at the
‘edges, which remain still in place on two sides of the
structure. The entrance to it, on the north side, was
conspicuous, and seems to have had a metal orna-
mentation let into the stone. ‘The sepulchral chamber
was beautifully lined and roofed, and the sarcopl
was exquisitively carved. Menkaura, the constructor,
was not regarded as a tyrant, or an oppressor, but as
a mild and religious monarch, whom the gods
by giving him too short a reign. His religioust
is indicated by the inscription on the coffin which
contained his remains: “ O Osiris,” it reads, “ King of
Upper and Lower Egypt, Menkaura, living eternally,
engendered by the Heaven, born of Nut, substance of
Seb, thy mother Nut stretches herself over thee in,
her name of the abyss of heaven, She renders thee
divine by destroying all thy en © King Men-
kaura, living eternally.”
‘The fashion of burying in pyramids continued to
the close of Manetho’s sixth dynasty, but no later
monarchs rivalled the great works of Khufu and
Shafra. ‘The tombs of their successors were monu-
ments of a moderate size, involving no oppression
of the people, but perhaps rather improving their
condition by causing a rise in the rate of wages.
CONDITION OF EGYPT UNDER THEM. gt
Certainly, the native remains of the period give a
cheerful representation of the condition of all classes.
The nation for the most part enjoys peace, and
applies itself to production, The wealth of the
nobles increases, and the position of their dependents
Slaves were few, and there was ample
employment for the labouring classes. We donot see
the stick at work upon the backs of the labourers
the sculptures of the time; they seem to accomplish
their various tasks with alacrity and gaicty of heart.
‘They plough, and hoe, and reap; drive cattle or asses;
winnow and store corm; gather grapes and tread
them, singing in chorus as they tread; cluster round
the winepress or the threshingfloor, on which the
animals tramp out the grain; gather lotuses; save
cattle from the inundation; engage in fowling or
fishing ; and do all with an apparent readiness and,
cheerfulness which seems indicative of real content.
There may have been a darker side to the picture,
and undoubtedly was while Khufu and Shafra held
the throne; but kings of a morose and cruel temper
seem to have been the exception, rather than the rule,
in Egypt ; and the moral code, which required kind-
ness to be shown to dependents, seems, at this period
at any rate, to have had a hold upon the consciences,
and to have influenced the conduct, of the mas of the
people. “Happy the nation that has no history!”
Egypt duringthis goldenage was neither assailed by
any aggressive power beyond her borders, nor had
herself conceived the idea of distant conquest. An,
‘occasional raid upon the negroes of the South, or
chastisement of the nomades of the East, secured her
THE PYRAMID BUILDERS.
interests in those quarters, and prevented her warlike
virtues from dying out through lack of use. But
otherwise tranquillity was undisturbed, and the ener-
gies of the nation were directed to increasing its
jal prosperity,
and to progressin the arts.
Among the marvels of Egypt perhaps the Sphinx
is second to none. The mysterious being with the
head ofa man and the body of a lion is not at all
common ia Egyptian architectural adornment, but
the one placed before the Second Pyramid (the
Pyramid of Shafra), and supposed to be contem-
porary with it, astonishes the observer by its gigantic
proportions. It is known to the Arabs as Abul-
hol, the father of terror, It measures more than one,
hundred fect in length, and was partially carved from
the rocks of the Lybian hills. Between its out=
stretched fect there stands a chapel, uncovered in
1816, three walis of which are formed by tablets
bearing inscriptions indicative of its use and origin.
A small temple behind the great Sphinx, probably
also built by Shafra, is formed of great blocks of the
hardest red granite, brought from the neighbour-
hood of Syene and fitted to each other with a nicety
astonishing to modern architects, who are unable to
imagine what tools could have proved equal to the
difficult achievement. Mysterious passages pierce
the great Sphinx and connect it with the Second,
Pyramid, three hundred feet west of it, In the face
of this mystery all questions are vain, and yet every
‘or adds new queries to those that others have
asked before him.
THE GREAT SPHINX, 93
Since what unnumbered year
Hast thou kept watch and ward,
And o'er the buried land of fear
‘So grimly held thy guard?
No faithless slumber snatching,
Sill couched in silence brave,
Like some fiere hound, long watching
“Above her master’s graves vs +
Dost thoa fn anguish thus
Sill brood o'er CEdipus?
Dall headsof human-kind,
And inly make thy moan,
‘That, mid the hated erew,
Whom thou so long eotldst vex,
Bewildee and perplex,
‘Thou yet eouldst finda subiler than thine owe”
‘Been now, methinks that those
Dark, heavy lips which close
Tn such astern repose,
‘Seem burdened with some thought unas,
‘ad hoard within thei portals dread
Some fearfl secret there,
Which othe listening earth
She may not whisper forth,
Not even to the air!
Of awful wonders hid
Tn yonder dread Pyra
‘The home of magic feas +
Ofchambers vast and lonely,
Watched by the Geni only,
‘Who tend their masters’ long: ten bier,
‘And treasures that have shone
‘On cavern walls alone,
For thousand, thovsand years.
Would she but tel . She knows
‘Of the old Pharaohs 5
THE PYRAMID BUILDERS.
Could count the Ptolemies? longline5
Each mighty myth's original hath seen,
Apis, Aubisy—ahosts that haunt between
And Oxymandyas
Decp-versed in many a dark Egyptian
‘The Hebrew boy hath eyed
Cold to the master's bide
And that Medusan stare hat frozen the smile
(Of all her love and guile,
For whom the Cxsar sighed,
‘And the word-loser died,—
‘The darling ofthe Nile,
¥
THE RISE OF THEBES TO POWER, AND THE EARLY
‘THEBAN KINGS.
Hrrnerto Egypt had been ruled from « site at
the junction of the narrow Nile valley with the broad
plain of the Delta—a site sufficiently represented by.
the modern Cairo. But now there was as!
seat of power. There is reason to believe that some-
thing like a disruption of
doms took place, and that for a while several dist
dynasties bore sway in different parts of the count
Disruption was ly accompanied by weakness
and decline. The old order ceased, and opportunity
was offered for some new order—some new power—
to assert itself, The site on which it arose was one
three hundred and fifty miles distant from the ancient,
zapital, or four hundred and more by the river. Here,
about lat, 267, the usually narrow valley of the Nile
opens into a sort of plain or basin, The mountains
on either side of the river recede, as though by con
‘mon consent, and leave between themselves and the
river's bank a broad amphitheatre, which in each case
isarich green plain—an alluvium of the most pro-
ductive character—dotted with dom and date palms,
sometimes growing single, sometimes collected into
96 THE RISE o THEBES TO POWER
clumps or groves. On the western side the Libyan
range gathers itself up into a single considerable
peak, which has an elevation of twelve hundred feet.
On the east the desert-wall maintains its usual level
character, but is pierced by valleys conducting to the
coast of the Red Sea. The situation was one favour-
able for commerce. On the one side was the nearest
route through the sandy desert to the Lesser Oasis,
which commanded the trade of the African interior
on the other the way led through the valley of Ham-
mamat, rich with dreecéa verde and other valuable and,
rare stones, to a district abounding in mines of gold,
silver, and lead, and thence to the Red Sea coast,
from which, even in very early times, there was com-
munication with the opposite coast of Arabia, the
region of gums and spices.
In this position there had existed, probably from
the very beginnings of Egypt, a provincial city of
some repute, called by its inhabitants Apé or Apiu,
and, with the feminine article prefixed, Tapé, or
Tapiu, which some interpret “The city of thrones.”
To the Greeks the name “Tapé” seemed to resemble
their own well-known “ Thebai,” whence they trans-
ferred the familiar appellation from the Baotian to
the Mid-Fgyptian town, which has thus come to be
known to Englishmen and Anglo-Americans as
“Thebes” Thebes had been from the first the
capital of a “nome.” It lay so far from the court,
that it acquired a character of its own—a special cast.
of religion, manners, speech, nomenclature, mode of
writing, and the like—which helped to detach it from
Lower or Northern Egypt more even than its isola-
ANTEF 1, THE FIRST KNOWN THEBAN KING. 97
tion. Still, it was not until the northern kingdom
sank into decay’ from internal weakness and exhaus-
tion, and disintegration supervened in the Delta and
elsewhere, that Thebes resolved to assert herself and
claim independent sovereignty. Apparently, she
achieved her purpose without having recourse to arms.
The kingdoms of the north were content to let her
go. They recognized their own weakness, and allowed
the nascent power to de op itself unchecked and
unhindered.
The first known Theban monarch is a certain
Antef or Enantef, whose coffin was discovered in
the year 1827 by some Arabs near Qurnah, to the
west of Thebes. The mummy bore the royal
diadem, and the epigraph on the lid of the coffin
declared the body which it contained to be that of
“Antef, king of de two Egypts.” The phrase im-
plied a claim to dominion over the whole country,
but a claim as purely nominal as that of the kings
England from Edward IV, to George III. to be
chs of France and Navarre. Antef’s rule may
possibly have reached to Elephantine on the one
hand, but is not likely to have extended much beyond
Coptos on the other. He was a local chieftain
posing as a great sovereign, but probably with no
intention to deceive either his own contemporaries
or posterity. His name appears in some of the later
Egyptian dynastic lists; but no monument of his
time has come down to us except the one that has
been mentione:
Antef I. is thought to have been succeeded by
Mentu-hotep 1, a monarch even more shadowy.
98 THE RISE OF THEBES TO POWER.
known to us only from the “Table of Sarak.” This
prince, however, is followed by one who possesses a
greater amount of substance—Antef-aa, or “ Antef
the Great,” grandson, as it would seem, of the first
Antef—a sort of Egyptian Nimrod, who delighted
above all things in the chase. Antefaa’s sepulchral
‘monument shows him to us standingin the midst of his,
dogs, who wear collars, and have their names engraved,
over them, ‘The dogs are four in number, and are of
distinct types. The first, which is called Makut, or
“ Antelope,” has drooping ears, and long but somewhat
heavy legs; it resembles a foshound, and was no doubt
both swift and strong, though it can scarcely have
been so swiftas its namesake. ‘The second was called
Abakaru,a name of unknown meaning ; it has pricked,
pointed ears, a pointed nose, and a curly tail.
Some have compared it with the German spitz dog,
but it seems rather to be the original dog of nature,
a near congener of the jackal, and the type to which,
all dogs revert when allowed to run wild and breed,
indiscriminately. ‘The third, named Pafats or
Kamu, ie. “ Blacky,” is a heavy animal, not unlike a
mastiff; it has a small, rounded, drooping ear, a
juare, blunt nose, a deep chest, and thick limbs.
The late Dr. Birch supposed that it might have been
mployed by Antefaa in “the chase of the lion ;” but
wwe should father regard it asa watch-dog, the terror
of thieves, and we suspect that the artist gave it the
sitting attitude to indicate that its business was not to,
hunt, but to keep watch and ward at its master’s gate.
The fourth dog, who bears the name of Tekal, and
walks between his master’s legs, has ears that seem
ANTEF Il. AND HIS DOGS. 99
to have been cropped. He has been said to resemble
“the Dalmatian hound” ; but this is questionable.
His peculiarities are not marked ; but, on the whole,
it seems most probable that he is “a pet house-dog” ©
of the terrier class, the special favourite of his master.
Antefaa’s dogs had their appointed keeper, the master
of his kennel, who is figured on the sepulchral tablet
behind the monarch, and bears the name of Tekenru.
‘The hunter king was buried in a tomb marked only
by a pyramid of unbaked brick, very humble in its
character, but containinga mortuary chapel in which
the monument above described was set up. An in-
scription on the tablet declared that it was erected to
the memory of Antef the Great, Son of the Sun, King
of Upper and Lower Egypt, in the fiftieth year of his
Other Mentu-hoteps and other Antefs continued on.
the line of Theban kings, reigning quietly and inglo-
riously, and leaving no mark upon the scroll of time,
yet probably advancing the material prosperity of
their country, and preparing the way for that rise to
greatness which gives Thebes, on the whole, the fore=
most place in Egyptian history. Useful projects,
occupied the attention of these monarchs One of
them sank wells in the valley of Hammamat, to pro-
vide water for the caravans which plied between
Coptos and the Red Sea. Another established
military posts in the valley to protect the traffic and
the Egyptian quarrymen. Later on,a king called
Sankh-ka-ra launched a fleet upon the Red Sea waters,
* So Mr. A. D. Bartlett,F.Z.S. in the “Transactions
of the Society
of Biblial Arehaology,” vol. iv. p. 195-
100 THE RISE OF THEBES 0 POWER.
and opened direct communications with the sacred
nd of Punt, the region of odoriferous gums and ci
nge ani raffes, panthers, hunting leopards,
eynocephalous apes, and long-tailed monkeys, ‘There
is some doubt whether “Punt” was Arabia Felix, or
the Somauli country. Ina , it lay far down
the Gulf, and could only be reached after a voyage of
many days
‘The dynasty of the Antefs and Mentu-hoteps, which
terminated with Sankh-ka-ra, was followed by one
in which the prevailing names were Usurtasen and
Amenemhat. ‘This dynasty is Manetho's twelfth,
and the time of its rule has been characterized as “ the
happiest age of Egyptian history?” The second
phase of Egyptian civilization now set in—a phase
which is regarded by many as outshining the glories
of the first. ‘The first civilization had subordinated
the people to the monarch, and had aimed especially
at eternizing the memory and setting forth the power
and greatness of king after king. The second had
the benefit and advantage of the people for its primary
object ; it was utilitarian, beneficent, appealing less to,
the eye than to the mind, far-sighted in
‘most successful in the results which it effected. The
wise rulers of the time devoted their energies and
their resources, not, as the carlicr kings, to piling
up undying memorials of themselves in the shape
of monuments that “reached to heaven,” but to,
usefull works, to the excavation of wells and reservoirs,
the making of roads, the encouragement of commerce,
and the development of the vast agricultural wealth
1, Stuat Powe, * Cites of Egypt, psa
ACCESSION OF AMENEMHAT 1, rot
of the country. They also diligently guarded the
frontiers, chastised aggressive tribes, and checked
invasion by the establishment of strong fortresses in
positions of importance. ‘They patronized art, em-
ploying themselves in building temples rather than
tombs, and adorned their temples not only with
reliefs and statues, but also with the novel architectu
embellishment of the obelisk, a delicate form, and one,
especially suited to the country.
‘The founder of the “twelfth dynasty.” Amenemhat
I, deserves a few words of description. He found
hebes in a stateof anarchy ; civil war raged on every
ide; all the traditions of the past were forgotten;
noble fought against noble ; the poor were oppressed
life and property were alike insecure; “there was,
stability of fortune neither for the ignorant nor for
the learned man.” One night, after he had lain
down to sleep, he found himself attacked in his bed-
chamber ; the clang of arms sounded near at hand,
Starting from his couch, he seized his own weapons,
and struck out; when lo! his assailants fled ; detected,
in their attempt to assassinate him, they dared not
offer any resistance, thus showing themselves alike
treacherous and cowardly. Amenemhat, having once
taken arms, did not lay them down til he had
defeated every rival, and so fought his way to the
crown, Once acknowledged as king, he ruled with
moderation and equity ; he “gave to the humble, and
made the weak to live;” he “caused the afflicted to
cease from their afflictions, and their cries to be heard
no more ;” he brought it to pass that none hu
or thirsted in the land; he gave such orders to his
servants as continually increased the love of his
people towards him. At the same time, he was an
energetic warrior. He “stood on the boundaries of
the land, to keep watch on its borders,” personally.
leading his soldiers to battle, armed with the £/cpesh
or falchion, He carried on wars with the Petti, or
bowmen of the Libyan interior, with the Sakti or
Asiaties, with the Maxyes or Mazyes of the north-
west, and with the Ua-uat and other negro tribes of
the south ; not, however, as it would seem, with any,
desire of making conquests, but simply for the pro-
tection of his own frontier. With the same object he
constructed on his north-eastern frontier a wall or
fortress “to keep out the Sakti,” who continually
harassed the people of the ste Delta by their
‘The wars of Amenemhat I. make it evident that by.
his time Thebes had advanced from the position of a
petty kingdom situated in a remote part of Egypt,
and held in check by two or more rival kingdoms in
the lower Nile valley and the Delta, to that of a
power which bore sway over the whole land from
Elephantine to the Mediterranean, “I sent my.
messengers up to Abu (Elephantine) and my couriers
down to Athu” (the coast lakes), says th
his “Instructions” to his son—the earl
production from a royal pen that has come down to
our days; and there is no reason to doubt the truth,
of his statement. In the Delta alone could he come
into contact with either the Mazyes or the
aking of Thebes could not hold the Delta without
being master also of the lower Nile valley from,
AMENI MHAT'S HUNTING PROWESS. 103
Coptos to Memphis. We must regard Egypt, then,
under the “twelfth dynasty,” as once more consoli-
dated into a single state—a state ruled, however, not
from Memphis, but from Thebes, a decidedly inferior
positio
Amenemhat I. is the only Egyptian king who.
makes a boast of his hunting prowess. “I hunted
the lion,” he says, “and brought back the crocodile
a prisoner.” Lions do not at the present time frequent
Egypt, and, indeed, are not found lower down the
Nile valley than the point where the Great Stream
receives its last tributary, the Atbara. But anciently

they seem to have haunted the entire desert tracts
on either side of the river. The Roman Emperor
Hadrian is said to have hunted one near Ale: .
and the monuments repre: and
used in the chase by the Some-
times they even accompanied their masters to the
battlefield. We know nothing of Amenemhat’s mode
of hunting the king of beasts, but may assume that it
was not very different from that which prevailed at a
later date in Assyria. There, dogs and beaters were
employed to rouse the animals from their lairs, while
the king and his fellow-sportsmen either plied them
hts of arrows, or withstood their onset with
swords and spears. The crocodile was certainly
sometimes attacked while he was in the water, the
hunters using a boat, and endeavouring to spear him
at the point where the head joins the spine; but this
could not have been the mode adopted by Amenem-
hat, since it would have resulted in instant death,
whereas he tells us that he “brought the crocodile
home a prisoner.” Possibly, therefore, he employed
the method which Herodotus says was in common
use in his day. This was to bait a hook with a joint
of pork and throw it into the water at a point where
the current would carry it out into mid-stream ; then
to take a live pig to the river-side, and belabour him
well with a stick till he set up the squeal familiar to
most ears, Any crocodile hearing was sure
to come to the sound, and falling in with the pork on
the way, would instantly swallow it down. Upon
this the hunters hauled at the rope to which the hook
was attached, and, notwithstanding his struggles, drew,
“leviathan” to shore Amenemhat, having thus
made the crocodile a prisoner,” may have carried
his captive in triumph to his capital, and exhibited
him before the eyes of the people.
‘Amenemhat, having reigned as sole king for twenty
years, was induced to raise his eldest son, Usurtasen,
to the royal dignity, and associate him with himself
in the government of the empire. Usurtasen was a
REIGN OP USURT: rs 05
prince of much promise, He “brought prosperity to
the affairs of his father. He was, as a god, without
fears ; before him was never one like to him. Most
skilful in affairs, beneficent in his mandates, both in
his going out and in his coming in he made Egypt
flourish.” His courage and his warlike capacity were
Already, in the lifetime of his father, he had
hed himself in combats with the Petti and
When he was settled upon the throne, he
made war upon the Cushite tribes who bordered
Egypt upon the south, employing the services of a
general named Ameni, but also taking a part per-
sonally in the campaign. ‘The Cushites or Ethiopians,
who in later times became such dangerous neighbours,
to Egypt, were at this carly period weak and insigni
ficant. After the king had made his expedit
Ameni was able with a mere handful of four hundred
troops to penetrats into their country, to “conduct
the golden treasur:s” which it contained to the
presence of his master, and to capture and carry off a,
herd of three thousand cattle
It was through his sculptures and his architectural
works that the first Usurtasen made himself chiefly
conspicuous. Thebes, Abydos, Heliopolis or On, the
Fayoum and the Delta, were equally the scenes of his
constructive activity, and still show traces of his
presence. At Thebes, he carried to its completion
the cel , or xaos, of the great temple of Ammon, in
later times the innermost sanctuary of the building,
and reckoned so sacred, that when Thothmes IIT
rebuilt and enlarged the entire edifice he reproduced
the structure of Usurtasen, unchanged in form, and
rob THE RISE OF THEDI 70 POWER.
merely turned from limestone into granite. At
Abydos and other cities of Middle Egypt, he cone
structed temples adorned with sculptures, inscriptions,
and colossal statues. AtTanis, he set up his own statue,
exhibiting himself as seated upon his throne. In the
Fayoum he erected an obelisk forty-one feet high to,
the honour of Ammon, Phthah, and Mentu, which
now lies prone upon the ground near the Arab village
ig. Indications of his ubiquitous acti
found also at the Wady Magharah, in the
peninsula, and at Wady Hal
the Second Cataract; but his gr
elaborate work was his construction of the great
temple of the Sun at Heliopolis, and his best memorial
is that tall finger pointing to the sky which greets
the traveller approaching Egypt from the east as the
first sample of its strange and mystic wonders. This
temple the king began in his third year. After a
consultation with his lords and counsellors, he issued
solemn decree: “It is determined to execute the
it made. Let the
superintendent ca on in the way that is desired;
let all those employed upon it be vigilant; let them
see that it is made without weariness; let every due
seremonybe performed; let the beloved place ari
Phen the king rose up, wearing a diadem, and holding
the double pen; and all present followed him. ‘The
scribe read the holy book, and extended the measuring
cord, and laid the foundations on th: spot which the
temple was to occupy. A grand building arose; but
it has been wholly demolished by the ruthless hand
of time and the barbarity of conquerors, Of all its
OBELISK OF USURTASEN 1. O8
REIGN OF THE SECOND USURTASEN. 109
glories nothing now remains but the one taper
obelisk of pink granite, which rises into the soft sleepy
air above the green cornfields of Matariyeh, no
longer tipped with gold, but still catching on its,
summit the earliest and latest sun-rays, while wild-bees,
nestle in the crannies of the w rd characters cut into
tthe stone.
Usurtasen, after reigning fen years in conjunction
with his father and thirty-two years alone, associated
his son, Amenemhat IL, who became sole king about,
three years later. His reign, though long, was undis-
nguished, and need not occupy our attention. He
followed the example of his predecessors in associating
son in the government ; and this son succeeded him,
and is known as Esurtasen-II, One event of interest,
alone belongs to this time. It is the reception by.
‘one of his great officials of a large family or tribe of
Semitic immigrants from Asia, who beg permission
to settle permanently in the fertile Egypt under the
protection of its powerful king, Thirty-sev
‘men, women, and children, present themselves at the
court which the great noble holds near the castern,
border, and offer him their homage, while they solicit
a favourable hearing. ‘The men are represented
draped in long garments of various colours, and wear-
ing sandals unlike the Egyptian—more resembling,
fact, open shoes with many straps. Th
are bows, arrows, spears, and clubs. One plays on a.
seven-stringed lyre by means of a plectrum. Four
women, wearing fillets round their heads, with gar-
ments reaching below the knee, and wearing anklets
but no sandals, accompany them. A boy, armed with
110 THE RISE OF THEBES TO POWER,
a spear, walks at the side of the women
children, seated in a kind of panier placed 0
back of an ass, ride on in front. Another ass, carrying,
a spear,a shield, and a pannier, precedes the man who
plays on the lyre. a
Khnum-hotep, receives the foreigners, accompanied
by an attendant who carries his sandals and a staff,
and who is followed by three dogs. A scribe, named
Nefer-hotep, unrolls before his master a strip of
Papyrus, on which are inscribed the words, “The
sixth year of the reign of King Usurtasen. Sha-khepr-
ra: account rendered of the Amu who in the lifetime
of the chief, Khnum-hotep, brought to him the mineral,
‘mastemut, from the country of Pit-shu—they are in
all thirty-seven persons” ‘The mineral sastemut is
thought to be a species of stibium or antimony, used
for dying the skin around the eyes, and so increasing
their beauty, Besides this offering, the head of the
tribe, who is entitled 4/al, or “prince,” and named,
Abusha, presents to Khnum-hotep a magnificent wild-
goat, of the kind which at the present day frequents
the rocky mountain tract of Sinai. He wears a richer
dress than his companions, one which is ornamented,
witha fringe, and has a wavy border round the neck.
‘The scene has been generally recognized as strikingly.
illustrating the coming of Jacob's family into Egypt
(Gen. xIvi. 28-34), and was at one time thought by
some to represent that occurrence; but the date of
Abusha’s coming is long anterior to the arrival in
Egypt of Jacob’s family, the number is little more
than half that of the Hebrew immigrants, the names
do not accord ; and it is now agreed on all hands,
AFRICAN CONQUESTS OF USURTASEN 111, 11%
thatthe interest of the representation is confined to its
illustrative force,
Usurtasen II. reigned for nineteen years. He does
not seem to have associated a son, but was succeeded,
by another Usurtasen, most probably a nephew. ‘The
third Usurtasen. was a conquering monarch, and
advanced the power and glory of Egypt far more
than any other ruler belonging to the Old Empire.
He began his military operations in his cighth year,
and starting from Elephantine in the month
or May, moved southward, like another Lord Wolseley,
with a fixed intention, which he expressed in writing
upon the rocks of the Elephantine island, of per-
ently reducing to subjection “the miserable land
of Cush.” His expedition was so far successful that
in the same year he established two forts, one on
cither side of the Nile, and set up two pillars with
inscriptions warning the black races that they were
not to proceed further northward, except with the
object of importing into Egypt cattle, oxen, goats, or
asses. The forts are still visible on either bank of
the river a little above the Second Cataract, and bear
the names of Koommeh and Semnch. They are
massive constructions, built of numerous squared
blocks of granite and sandstone, and perched upon,
two steep rocks which rise up perpendicularly from,
the river. Usurtasen, having made this beginning
proceeded, from his eighth to his sixteenth year, to
carry on the war with perseverance and ferocity in,
the district between the Nile and the Red Sea—to,
Kill the men, fire the crops, and carry off the women
and children, much as recently did the Arab traders,
whom Baker and Gordon strove to crush, The
memory of his razzi ‘was perpetuated upon stone
column set up to record his successes. Later on, in
his nineteenth year he made a last expedition, to
‘complete the conquest of “the miserable Kashi,” and,
recorded his victory at Abydos.
‘The effect of these inroads was to advance the
Egyptian frontier one hundred and fifty miles to the
south, to carry it, in fact, from the First to above the
Second Cataract. -Usurtasen drew the line between
Egypt and Ethiopia at this period, very much where
the British Government drew it between Egypt and
the Soudan in 1883. ‘The boundary is a somewhat
artificial one, as any boundary must be on the course,
of a great river ; but it is probably as convenient a
point as can be found between Assouan (Syene) and
Khartoum, The conquest was regarded as redound-
ing greatly to Usurtasen’s glory, and made him the
hero of the Old Empire. Myths gathered about his
name, which, softened into Sesostris, became a
favourite one in the mouths of Egyptian minstrels
and minnesingers. Usurtasen grew to be a giant
more than seven feet high, who conquered, not only
but also Europe and Asia ; his columns
to be found in Palestine, Asia Minor,
Scythia, and Thrace; he left a colony at Colchis, the city
of the golden fleece; he dug all the canals by which
Egypt was intersected; he invented geometry ; he set
up colossi above fifty feet high ; he was the greatest
monarch that had ruled Egypt since the days of Osiris
No doubt these tales were, in the main, imaginary ;
but they marked the fact that in Usurtasen IIL the
military glories of the Old Empire culminated,
VL
THE GOOD AMENEMHAT AND HIS WORKS.
‘Tue great river to which Egypt owes her being,
at once the source of all her blessings and her chiefest
danger. Swelling with a uniformity, well calculated
to call forth man’s gratitude and admiration, almost
from a fixed day in each year, and continuing to rise
steadily for months, it g radually spreads over the
lands, covering the entire soil with a fresh coating of,
the richest possible alluvium id thus securing’ to
the country a perpetual and inexhaustible ferti ye
Nature's mechanism is so perfect, that the rise yea
after year scarcely aries a foot, and is almost exactly
the same now as it was when the first Pharaoh poured
his libation to the river od from the embankment
which he had made at but though this,
uniformity is great, and remarkable, and astonish
it is not absolute.
or three centuries, when the rainfall in Abyss
excessive. The Blue Nile and the Atbara pour into
the deep and steady stream of the White Nile torrents
of turbid water for months together. The windows of
heaven seem to have been opened, and the rain pours
down as if it would never cease. Then the river of
the Egyptians assumes a threatening character; faster
114 THE GOOD AMENEMHAT AND HIS WORKS.
and faster it rises, and higher and higher ; and further
and further it spreads, until it begins to cre p up the
sides of the two ranges of hills. Calamitous results,
ensue. The mounds erected to protect the cities, the
villages, and the pasture lands, are surmounted, oF
Jermined, or washed away ; the houses, built often
of mud, and seldom of any better material than crude,
brick, collapse; cattle are drowned by hundreds;
hun life is itself imperilled ; the population has to
betal itselfto boats, and to. fly to the desert regions
which enclose the Nile valley to the cast and west,
regions of frightful sterility, which with difficulty:
support the few wandering tribes that are their normal
inhabitants, If the excessive rise continues long,
thousands or millions starve ; if it passes off rapidly,
then the inhabitants return to find th iF homes deso-
lated, their cattle drowned, their household goods
washed away, and themselves dependent on the few,
rich men who may have stored their corn in stone
granaries which the waters have not been able to
penetrate. Disasters of this kind are, however, ex-
ceedingly rare, though, when they occur, their results,
are terrible to contemplat
The more usual form of calamity is of the oppo
kind, Once or twice in a century the Abyssinian
rainfall is deficient. ‘The rise of the Nile is deferred
beyond the proper date. Anxious eyes gaze daily on
the sluggish stream, or consult the “ Nilometers” which
kings and princes have constructed
to measure the increase of the waters. Hopes and
fears alternate as good or bad news reaches the i
habitants of the lower valley from those who dwell
EVILS OF A DEFICIENT INUNDATION. 115
higher up the stream. Each little rise is expected to,
herald a greater one, and the agony of suspense is,
prolonged until the “hundred days,” traditionally,
assigned to the increase, have gone by c is
no longer a doubt that the river has b fall
Then hope is swallowed up in despair. Only the
lands lying nearest to the river have beet inunda d
those at a greater distance from it lie parched and,
arid during the entire summer-time, and fail to pro-
duce a single blade of grass or spike of corn. Famine
stares the poorer classes in the face, and unless large
supplies of grain have been laid up in store previously,
or can be readily imported from abroad, the actual
starvation of large numbers is the inevitable con-
sequence. We have heartrending accounts of such,
famines. In the year 457 of the Hegira (A.D. 1064)
a famine began, which lasted seven years, and was so
wvere that dogs and ci fs, and even human flesh,
were caten ; all the horses of the Caliph but three
perished, and his family had to fly into Syria,
Another famine in A.D. 1199 is recorded by Abd-el-
nilar terms.
sason to believe that, under the twelfth
, some derangement of meteoric or atmo-
conditions passed over Abyssinia and Upper
Egypt, cither in both the directions above noticed, or,
at any rate, in the latter and more ordinary one. An
was no poverty in my my time,

even when there were years of famine. I ploughed
all the fields of Mah to its southern and northern
316 THE GOOD AMENEMHAT AND HIS WORKS,
boundaries ; T gave life to its inhabitants, making its,
food ; no one was starved T gave to the widow
as to the married woman,” As the late Dr. Birch,
observes, “ Egypt was occasionally subject to famin
and these, at the time of the twelfth dynast
t, that they attracted great atten ion, and
jered worthy of record by the p
Under the twelfth dynasty, also, the tombs of Al
show the creation of superintendents, or storekeepers
of the public granaries,a class of functionaries ap-
parently created to meet the contingency.”
‘The distress of his subjects under these circum-
stances seems to have drawn the thoughts of “the
good Amenemhat” to the devising of some system
which should effectually remedy these evils, by pre-
venting their occurrence. In all countries where the
supply of water is liable to be deficient, it is of the
utmost importance to utilize to the full that amount
of the life-giving fluid, be it more or be it less, which,
the bounty of nature furnishes, Rarely, indeed, is
nature absolutely a niggard. Mostly she gives far
more than is needed, but the improvidence or the
apathy of man allows her gifts to run to waste
Careful and provident husbanding of her store will
nerally make it suffice for all man’s needs and r
ements, Sometimes this has been effected
thirsty land by conducting all the rills and brooks
that flow from the highlands or hills into subterranean,
conduits, where they are shielded from the sun’s rays,
and prolonging the: ducts for miles upon miles, till
+ + Records ofthe Pat," vol a, p, 60.
POSSIBLE MODES OF STORING WATER. 117
every drop of the precious fluid has been utilized for
itrigation. Such is the Aarees or kanat system of
Persia. In other places vast efforts have been made
to detain the abundant supply of rain which nature
commonly provides in the spring of the year, to store
it, and prevent it from flowing off down the river-
courses to the sea, where it is absolutely lost. For
this purpose, either huge reservoirs must be construe-
ted by the hand of man, or else advantage must be
taken of some facility which nature offers for storing
the water in convenient situations. Valleys may be
blocked by massive dams, and millions of gallons thus
imprisoned for future use, as is done in many parts of
the North of England, but for manufacturing and not
for irrigation purposes. Or naturally land-locked
ns may be found, and the overflow of streams at
ime turned into them and arrested, to be
c of later in the year.
In Egypt the one and only valley was that of the
Nile, and the one and only stream that which had.
formed it, and flowed along it, at a lower or higher
level, ceaselessly. It might perhaps have been possible
for Egyptian engineering skill to have blocked the
valley at Silsilis, or at the Gebelein, and to have thus
turned Upper Egypt into a huge reservoir always
full, and always capable of supplying Lower Egypt
with enough water to eke out a deficient inundation.
Bat this could only have been done by an enormous
work, very difficult to construct, and at the sacrifice
of several hundred square miles of fertile territory,
thickly inhabited, which would have been covered
permanently by the artificial lake. Moreover, the
m8 THE GOOD AMENEMHAT AND HIS WORKS.
Egyptians would have known that such an embanke
ment can under no circumstances be absolutely
secure, and may have forescen that its rupture would
spread destruction over the whole of the lower coun-
try. Amenemhat, at any rate, did not venture to
adopt so bold a design, He sought for a natural
depression, and found one in the Libyan range of
hills to the west of the Nile valley, about a degree
south of the latitude of Memphis—a depression of,
great depth and of ample expanse, fifty miles or more
in length by thirty in breadth, and containing an area
ofsix or seven hundred square miles, It was sepa-
rated from the Nile valley by a narrow ridge of hills
about two hundred feet high, through which ran from,
south-east to north-west a narrow rocky gorge, giving
access to the depression, It is possible that in very
high floods some of the water of the inundation passed,
naturally into the basin through this gorge; but
whether this were s0 or no, it was plain that by the
employment of no very large amount of labour a
canal or cutting might be carried along the gorge,
and the Nile water given free access into the depres-
sion, not only in very high floods, but annually when
the inundation reached a certain moderate height.
TI it Amenemhat did. He dug
a canal from the western branch of the Nile—the
modern Bahr Yousuf-—leaving it at El-Lahoun, carried
his canal through the gorge, in places cutting deep
into its rocky bottom, and by a system of sluices
and flood-gates retained such am absolate control
over the water that he could either admit or exclude
the inundation at his will, as it rose; an
AMENEMHAT’S GREAT RESERVOIR. 119
fell, could either allow the water that had flowed in
to return, of imprison it and keep it back. Within
the gorge he had thus at all times a copious store of
the invaluable fluid, banked up to the height of high
le, and capable of being applied to purposes of
cultivation both within and without the depression by
the opening and shutting of the sluices.
So much appears to be certain. The exact size
and position of Amenemhat's reservoir within the
depression, which a French sazant was supposed to
have discovered, are now called in question, and must
be admitted to be still sub judice, M. Linant de
Bellefonds regarded the reservoir as occupying the
south-eastern or upper portion of the depression only,
as extending from north to south a distance of fot
teen miles only, and from east to west a distance
varying from six to eleven miles. He regarded it as
artificially confined towards the west and north by.
two long lines of embankment, which he considered
that he had traced, and gave the area of the lake as
four hundred and five millions of square métres, or
about four hundred and eighty millions of square
yards. Mr. Cope Whitehouse believes that the
water was freely admitted into the whole of the
depression, which it filled, with the exception of
certain parts, which stood up out of the water as
islands, from one hundred and fifty to two hundred
feet high. He believes that it was in places three
hundred feet deep, and that the circuit of its shores
was from three hundred to five hundred miles. It is,
to be hoped that a scientific expedition will ere long,
set this dispute at rest, and enable the modern student
120. THE GOOD AMENEMHAT AND HIS WORKS.
distinctly to grasp and understand the great work of
Amenemhat. Whi y be the truth regarding
Lake Meeris,” as this great reservoir was called, itis
certain that it furnished the ancients one of the least
explicable of all the many problems that the remark=
able land of the Nile presented to them, Herodotus
added to the other marvels of the place a story about,
two sitting statues based upon pyramids, which stood,
three hundred feet above the level of the lake, and
famous labyrinth, of which we shall soon speak.
Whether the reservoir of Amenemhat had the larger
or the smaller dimensions ascribed to it, there can be
no doubt that it was a grand construction, undertaken
mainly for the benefit of his people, and greatly con-
ducing to their advantag if the reservoir had
only the dim ned to it by M. de Belle-
fonds, it would, according to his calculations, have
contained water sufficient, not only for irrigating the
northern and western portions of the Fayoum through-
out the year, but also for the supply of the whole
western bank of the Nile from Beni
embouchure at Canopus for six months
would in dry seasons have been a sensible relief to
a large portion of the population. If the dimensions,
exceeded those of De Bellefonds, the relief would have
been proportionately greater.
‘The good king was not, however, content merely to
benefit his people by increasing the productiveness of
Egypt and warding off the calamities that occasionally
befell the land ; he further gave employment to large
numbers, which was not of a severe or oppressive
kind, but promoted their comfort and welfare. In
YAAMID/(Sproseasite
ee res
:
8
i
HIS LABYRINTH. mr
connection with his hy aulic works in the Fayoum
he constructed a novel species of building, which after
ages admired even above the constructions of the
pyramid-builders, and regarded as the most wonderful
edifice in all the world. “TI visited the place,” says
Herodotus,' “and found it to surpass description; for
if all the walls and other great works of the Greeks
could be put together in one, they would not equal,
either for labour or expense, this Labyrinth ; and yet,
the temple of Ephesus is a building worthy of note,
and so is the temple of Samos. The pyramids like-
wise surpass description, and are severally equal to a
number of the greatest works of the Grecks ; but the
Labyrinth surpasses the pyramids. It has twelve
courts, all of them roofed, with gates exactly opposite
one another, six looking to the north, and six to the
south. A single wall surrounds the whole building.
It contains two different sorts of chambers, half of
them underground, and half above-ground, the
latter built upon the former; the whole number is
three thousand, of each kind fifteen hundred, The
upper chambers I myself passed through and saw, and
what I say of them is from my own observation;
of the underground chambers I can only speak from
report, for the keepers of the building could not be
induced to show them, since they contained (they
said) the sepulchres of the kings who built the
Labyrinth, and also those of the sacred crocodiles.
Thus it is from hearsay only that I can speak of
them; but the upper chambers I saw with my own,
eyes, and found them to excel all other human pro-
+ Buterpe, chs 148.
322 THE GOOD AMENEMHAT AND HIS WORKS.
ductions ; for the passages through the houses, and
the varied windings of the paths across the courts,
excited in me infinite admiration, as I passed from
the courts into chambers, and from the chambers into,
colonnadles, and from the colonnades into fresh houses,
and again from these into courts unseen before. ‘The
roof was, throughout, of stone, like the walls ; and the
Is were carved all over with figures; every court
was surrounded with a colonnade, which was built
of white stones, exquisitely fitted together. At the
corner of the Labyrinth stands a pyramid, forty
fathoms high, with large figures engraved upon it,
which is entered by a subterranean passage.”
‘The pyramid intended is probably that examined
by Perring and Lepsius, which had a base of three
hundred feet, and an clevation, probably, of about
‘one hundred and eighty-five feet. It was built of
crude brick mixed with a good deal of straw, and
cased with a white silicious limestone. ‘The same
material was employed for the greater part of the
so-called “Labyrinth,” but many of the columns
were of red granite, and some perhaps of porphyry.
Most likely the edifice was intended as a mausoleum,
for the sacred erocodil and was gradually enlarged
for their accommod: ion—Amenemha
nomen was found on the pyramid, being merely the
first founder, ‘The number of the pillared courts,
and their similarity, made the edifice confusing to
ners, and got it the name of “ The Labyrinth” ;
but it is not likely the designers of the building had
any intention to mislead or to confuse.
‘Amenembhat's prenomen, or throne-name, assumed
HIS NAME OF MERIS. 323
(according to ordinary custom) on his accession, was,
Ra-n-mat, “Sun of Justice” or “Sun of Righteous-
ness.” ‘The assumption of the title indicates his desire
to leave behind him a character for justice and equity.
It is perhaps noticeable that the name by which the
Greeks knew him was Mceris, which may mean “the
beloved.” With him closes the first period of Theban,
greatness. A cloud was impending, and darker days
about to follow ; but as yet Egypt enjoyed a time of
progressive, and in the main peaceful, development.
Commerce, art, religion, agriculture, occupied her.
She did not covet other men’s lands, nor did other
men covet hers. The world beyond her borders knew
little of her, except that she was a fertile and well-
ordered Jand, whercto, in time of dearth, the needy
of other countries might resort with confidence.
vi.
ADRAHAM IN EGYPT,
“Now there was a famine in the land of Canaan;
and Abram went down into Egypt to sojourn there”,
(Gen. xii. 10). Few events in the history of mankind
more interesting than the visit which the author
of the Pentateuch thus places before us in les than,
a dozen words. The “father of the faithful,” the
great apostle of Monotheism, the wanderer from the
distant “Ur of the Chaldees,” familiar with Baby-
Jonian greatness, and Babylonian dissofuteness, and
Babylonian despotism, having quitted his city home
and adopted the simple habits of a Syrian nomadic
sheikh, finds himself forced to make acquaintance
with a second form of civilization, a second great
organized mo and to become for a time a
sojourner among the people who had held for cen-
turies the valley of the Nile. He had obeyed the
call which took him from Ur to Haran, from Haran
to Damascus, from Damascus to the hills of Can
he had divorced himself from city life and city usages;
he had embraced the delights of that free, wandering
e which has at all times so singular a charm
for ma yy» and had dwelt for we know not how many:
years in differ nt parts of Palestine, the chief of a
tribe rich in flocks and herds, moving with the: from
WHY ABRAIAM VISITED EGYPT. 125
place to place as the fancy took him. Tt was assuredly
with much reluctance that he quitted the open downs
and fresh breezes and oak groves of Canaan—the
and promised to him and to his seed after him, and
took his way through the “desert of the south” to
the great kingdom with which he and his race could
never hope to be on terms of solid friendship. But
the necessity which constrained him was imperative.
When, from the want of the ordinary spring rains,
drought and famine set in on the Palestinian uplands,
there was in ancient times but one resource. Egypt
was known as a land of plenty. Whether it were
Hebrew nomads, or Hittite warriors, or Phoenician
traders that suffered, Egypt was the sole refuge, the
sole hope. There the river gave the plenteous sts-
tenance which would be elsewhere sought in vain.
‘There were granaries and storehouses, and an old
established system whereby corn was laid up as a,
reserve in case of need, both by private individuals of
the wealthier classes and by the kings. ‘There among
the highest officers of state was the “ steward of the
public granary,” whose business it was, when famine
pressed, to provide, so far as was possible, both for
natives and foreigners, alleviating the distress of all,
while safeguarding, of course, the king’s interests
vii. 13-26).
therefore, when he found that ‘the famine
was grievous in the land” of Canaan, did the only,
thing that it was possible for him to do—left Pales-
tine, and wended his way through the desert to the
What company he took with him
A few years later we find him at the
126 ABRAHAM IN EGYPT.
head of a body of three hundred and eighteen men
capable of bearing arms—trained servants born in
his house ”—which implies the headship over a tribe
of at Ieast twelve hundred persons. He can scarcely,
have entered Egypt with a much smaller number. It
was before his separation from his nephew, Lot, whose
followers were not much fewer than his own. And to
leave any of his dependents behind would have been
to leave them to starvation, We must suppose a
numerous caravan organized, with asses and camels
to carry provisions and household stuff, and with the
women and the little ones conveyed as we see them,
in the sculpture representing the arrival of Abusha
from the same quarter, albeit with a smaller entourage.
The desert journey would be trying, and probably
entail much loss, especially of the cattle and beasts;
but at length, on the seventh or eighth day, as the
water was getting low in the skins and the camels
were beginning to faint and groan with the scant fare
and the long travel,a dark low line would appear
upon the edge of the horizon in front, and soon the
lie would deepen into a delicate fringe, sparkling
here and there as though it were sown with diamonds.
Then it would be recognized that there lay before
the travellers the fields and gardens and palaces and
obelisks of Egypt, the broad flood and rich plain of
the Nile, and their hearts would leap with joy, and,
life themselves up in thanksgiving to the Most High,
who had brought them through the great and terrible
wilderness to a land of plenty.
But now a fresh anxiety fell upon the spirit of the
* Adapted fom Kinglake’
HIS DECEIT RESPECTING SARAH. 127
chief Tradition tells us that already in Babylon
he had had experience of the violence and tyranny of
earthly potentates, and had with difficulty escaped
from an attempt which the king of Babylon made
upon his life. Either memory’ recalled this and
similar dangers, or reason suggested what the uw
bridied licence of irresponsible power might conceive
and execute under the circumstances. The Pharaohs
had, it is plain, already departed from the simple
manners of the earlier times, when each prince was
contented with a single wife, and had substituted for
the primitive law of monogamy that corrupt system
of hareem life which has kept its ground in the East
from an ancient date to the present day. Abraham,
was aware of this, and “as he was come near to enter
into Egypt,” but was not yet entered, he was seized
with a great fear. “ Behold,” he said to Sarai his wife,
“Behold now, I know that thou art a fair woman to
look upon; therefore it shall come to pass, wh
Egyptians shall see the , that they shall say,
his wife: and they wil kill me, but they will save
thee alive.” Under these circumstances Abraham,
with a craft not unnatural in an Oriental, but ce
tainly far from commendable, resolved to dissemble
his relationship towards Sarah, and to represent her
as not his wife, but his sister. She was, in point of
fact, his half-sister, as he afterwards pleaded to/
melech (Gen. x . 12), being the daughter of Terah by
a secondary wife, and married to her half-brother.
“Say, I pray thee,” he said, “thou art my sister, that
it may be well with me for thy sake; and my soul
shall live because of thee.” Sarah acquiesced; and
no doubt the whole tribe was made acquainted with
the resolution come to, so that they might all be in
one story.
‘The fr was then approached. We learn from
the history of Abusha, as well as from other scattered.
notices in the papyri, how carefully the eastern
border was always guarded, and what precautions
were taken to apprise the Court when any consider
able body of immigrants arrived. The chief official
upon the frontier, either Khnumhotep or some one
‘occupying a similar position, would receive the in-
comers, subject them to interrogation, and cause his
secretary to draw up a report, which would be for-
warded by courier to the capital. The royal orders
would be awaited, and meantime perhaps fresh reports
would be sent by other officials of the neighbourhood.
In the present instance, we are told that several
“princes of Pharaoh,” having been struck with the
beauty of Sarah, commended her to their royal
master, who sent for her and had her brought into
his own house. Abraham himself was well received
and treated with much distinction for her sake.”
According to Eupolemus, he and his were settled in
the sa-red city of On or Heliopolis; and there, in
tha: seat of learning and religion, the Patriarch, as the
same authority declares, lived peacefully for many
years and taught the Egyptians the sciences of as-
tronomy and arithmetic. The author of Genesis says
nothing of the place of his abode, but simply informs
us of his well-being. “Pharaoh entreated Abram well
for Sarai’s sake; and he had sheep, and oxen, and
hhe-asses, and men-servants, and maid-servants, and
HIS DECEIT DISCOVERED. 129
she-asses, and camels.” The collocation of the clauses
implies that all these were presents from the king.
‘The pleased monarch lavished on his brother-in-law
such gifts of honour as were usual at the time and,
suitable to his circumstances. Abraham became “very
rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold” (Gen. xi i. 2).
He flourished greatly, whether for months or for years,
the scripture does not say. He was separated from
his wife, and she was an inmate of Pharaoh’s hareem;
but he kept his secret, and no one betrayed him.
Apparently, he was content
Ere long, however, a discovery was made, Calami
came upon the royal house in some marked way, pro-
bably either in the form of sickness or of death, The
King became convinced that he was the object of a
Divine chastisement,and cast about fora cause to which,
his sufferings might reasonably be attributed. How
had he provoked God's anger? Either, as Josephus
thinks, the priests had by this time found out the truth,
and made the suggest n to him, that he was being
punished for having taken another m 's wife into his
seraglio ; or possibly,as others have surmised, Sarah.
herself divined the source of the calamities, and made
confession of the truth. At any rate, by some means
‘or other, the facts of the case became known ; and
the Pharaoh thereupon hastened to set matters right.
Sarah, though an inmate of the hareem, was probably
still in the probationary condition, undergoing the
purification necessary before the final completion of
her nuptials (Esth. ii, 12), and could thus be restored
intact. The Pharaoh sent for Abraham, reproached
him with his deceit, pointed out the ill consequences
which had followed, and, doubtless in some displeae
sure, required him to take his wife and depart. The
famine was at an end, and there was no reason why
he should linger. Beyond reproach, however, Pharaoh
inflicted no punishment. He “commanded his men
concerning Abraham ; and they sent him away, and
his wife, and alf that he had?”
Such is the account which has come down to us
of Abraham's sojourn in Egypt. If it be asked, Why,
inserted into the “ story of Egypt” at this point ?
the reply must be, because, on a dispassion:
ration of all the circumstances, chronological and
other, which attach to the narrative, it has been gene-
rally agreed that the event belongs to aoutthis time.
‘There is no spec to which it can be definitely
signed ; but the best crities acquiesce in the judg-
ment of Canon Cook upon the point, who says: “ For
my own part, I regard it as all but certain that Abra-
ham visited Egypt in some reign between the middle
of the eleventh and the thirteenth dynasty, and most.
probably under one of the earliest Pharaohs of the
twelfth.” *
This is not the only entrance of Hebrews or people
of Semitic race into Egypt. Emigrants from less
favoured countries had frequently looked with interest
to the fertile Delta of the Nile, hoping that there they,
might find homes free from the vicissitudes of their
own. Previous to this, one Amu had entered Eg
perhaps from Midi mily, counting thi
seven, the little ones riding upon asses, and had sought
the protection of the reigning sovereign. It was again
* See * Speaker's Commentary,” ol ip 447s 61
OTHER SEMITIC IMMIGRANTS. 331
the experience of Egypt to receive emigrants from the
north-east, from Syria or Northern Arabia, at a little
later period, when the nomads in those regions looked,
over to the south and, by contrast with their over-
peopled country, thought they saw a sort of “ fairy-
land of wealth, culture, and wisdom,” which they
hoped to enjoy by force; and they were not the last
to seck asylum there. We shall soon have to remark:
on the familiar case of the immigration of the sons of
Jacob with their households. In process of time the
Semitic wanderers increased so materially that the
population in the eastern half of the Delta became
half Asiatic, prepared to submit readily to Asiatic
rule and to worship Semitic deities ; they had already
imposed a number of their words upon the language
of Egypt.
Vit.
THE GREAT INVASION: B HYKSOS OR SHEPHERD
KINGS—JOSE LAND APEPL
Tue prowess of the Egyp ians had not yet been
put to any severe proof, They had themselves
shown little of an aggressive spirit. Attracted by
the mineral wealth of the Sinaitic peninsula, they had
indeed made settlements in that region, which had,
involved them in occasional wars with the natives,
whom they spoke of as “Mena” or “ Menti” ; and,
they had had a contest of more importance with the
tribes of the south, negro and Ethiopic, in which,
they had shown a decided superiority over those rude
barbarians; but, as yet, they had attempted no in
portant conquest, and had been subjected to no
serious attack. The countries upon their borders
were but sparsely peopled, and from neither the
Berber tribes of the northern African coast, nor from,
the Sinaitie nomads, nor even from the negroes of the
south, with their allies—the “ miserable Cushites "—
was any dangerous on to. be apprehended,
a able to devote herself almost wholly
to the cultivation of the arts of peace, and had not
been subjected to the severe ordeal, which most
nations pass through in their infancy, of a struggle
for existence with warlike and powerful enemies.
MoVEME SIN ASIA. 133
‘The time was now come for a great change. Move-
ments had begun among the populations of Asia
which threatened a general disturbance of the peace
vf the world, Asshur had had to “go forth” out of
the land of Shinar, and to make himself a habitation
further to the northward, which must have pressed
painfully upon other races. In Elam an
spirit had sprung up, and military expeditions had
been conducted by Elamitic kings, which started from
the shores of the Persian Gulf and terminated in
Southern Syria and Palestine. The migration of the
tribes which moved with Terah and Abraham from,
Ur to Haran, and from Haran to Hebron, is but,
one of many indications of the restlessness of the
period. The Hittites were growing in power, and
required an enlarged territory for their free expansion.
It was now probably that they descended from the
hills of Cappadocia upon the region below Taurus,
and Amanus, where we find them dominant in later
ages. Such a movement on their part would dis-
place a large population in Upper Syria, and force it
to migrate southwards, ‘There are signs of a pressure
upon the north-eastern frontier of Egypt on the part
of Asiatics needing a home as carly as the com-
mencement of the twelfth dynasty ; and it is probable
that, while the dynasty lasted, the pressure was con-
tinually becoming greater. Asiatics were from time
to time received within the barrier of Amenemhat L.,
some to sojourn and some to dwell. ‘The eastern
Delta was more or less Asiaticized ; and a large
portion of its inhabitants was inclined to welcome a,
further influx from Asia.
134 THE GREAT INVASION.
We have one account only of the circumstances of
the great invasion by which Egypt fell under a.
forcign yoke. It purports to come from the native
historian, Manetho; but it is delivered to us directiy,
by Josephus, who, in his reports of what other writers
had narrated, is not always to be implicitly trusted
Manetho, according to him, declared as. follows:
“There was once a king of Egypt named Tim
in whose reign the gods being offended, forI know
jot what cause, with our nation, certain men of
ignoble race, coming from the eastern regions, had,
the courage to invade the country, and falling upon,
it unawares, conquered it easily without a battle.
After the submission of the princes, they conducted,
themselves ina most barbarous fashion towards the
whole of the inhabitants, slaying some, and reducing
to slavery the wives and the children of the others.
Moreover they savagely sct the cities on fire, and
demolished the temples of the gods. At last, they
took one of their number called Salatis, and made
him king over them. Salatis resided at Memphis,
where he received tribute both from Upper and Lowes
Egypt, while at the same time he placed garrisons in
all the most suitable situations. He strongly forti-
fied the frontier, especially on the side of the east,
ince he foresaw that the Assyrians, who were then
exceedingly powerful, might desire to make them-
selves masters of his kingdom, Having found,
inoreover, in the Sethroite nome, to the east of the
Bubastite branch of the Nile, a city very favourably
situated, and called, on account of an ancient thec~
logical tradition, Avaris, he rebuilt it and strengthened
ITS OVERWHELMING FORCE 135
it with walls of great thickness, which he guarded
with a body of two hundred and forty thousand men,
Each summer he visited the place, to see their sup-
plies of corn measured out for his soldiers and thei
pay delivered to them, as well as to superintend their
military exercises, in order that foreigners might hold
them in respect.”
The king, Timaus, does not appear cither in the
lists of Manetho or upon the monuments, nor is it
possible to determine the time of the invasion more
precisely than this—that it fell into the interval be-
tween Manetho’s twelfth and his eighteenth dynas
‘The invaders are characterized by the Egyptians as
Menti or Sati; but these terms are used so vaguely
that nothing definite can be concluded from them.
On the whole, it is perhaps most probable that the
invading army, like that of Attila, consisted of a vast
variety of races—“a collection of all the nomadi
hordes of Syria and Arabia”—who made common,
cause against a foe known to be wealthy, and who all
equally desired settlements in a land reputed the
most productive in the East. An overwhel ng
flood of men—a quarter of a million, if we 1
believe Manetho—poured into the land, impetuous,
irresistible, All at once,a danger had come beyond,
all possible previous calculation—a danger from,
which there was no escape. It was as when the
northern barbarians swooped down in their count=
ids on the outlying provinces of the
pire, or as when the hordes of Jingis Khan
overran Kashgar and Kharesm—the contest was too
‘unequal for anything that can be called a struggle to
be made. tpt collapsed before the invader.
netho says that there was no battle; and we can
jerstand that in the divided condition of
with two or three subordinate dynasties
erent parts of the Delta, and another
at Thebes, no army could be levied which
could dare to meet the enemy in the field, The
nhabitants fled to their cities, and endeavoured to
defend themselves behind walls; but it was in vain.
The walls of the Egyptian cities were rather banks to,
keep out the inundation than ramparts to repel an
In a short time the strongholds that re-
were taken, the male population put to the
sword, the women and children enslaved, the houses,
burnt, the t nples ruthlessly demolished. An icono-
clastic spiri possessed the conquerors. The gods
and worship of Egypt were hateful to them. Where-
ever the flood passed, it swept away the existing,
civilization, deeply impregnated as it was with
religion ; it covered the ground with the débris of
temples and shrines, with the fragments of statues,
and sphinxes; it crushed existin jous usages,
and for a time, as it would seem, substituted nothing,
in their place. “A study of the monuments,” says M.
Frangois Lenormant, “attests the reality of the fright-
ful devastations which took place at the first moment
of the invasion, With a solitary exception, all the
temples anterior to the event have disappeared, and
no traces can be found of them except scattered
ns which bear the marks of a destructive violence.
ay what during these centuries Egypt had to
endure in the way of upsetting of her past is impos-
LIMITS TO WHICH IT EXTENDED 137
sible, The only fact which can be stated as certain,
is, that not a sinzle monument of this desolate epoch,
has come down to our days to show us what became
of the ancient splendour of Egypt under the Hyksos.
We witness under the fifteenth and sixteenth,
dynasties a fresh shipwreck of Egyptian civilization.
Vigorous as it had be n, the impulse given to it by
the Usurtasens suddenly stops ; the series of monu-
ments is interrupted, and Egypt informs us by her
very sil e of the calamities with which she was
smitten.” ©
Tt wat fort ely, not the entire country that
was overrun, So far as appears, the actual occu-
pation of Egypt by the Hyks0s was confined to the
to the Lower Nile valley, and to the district of
the ;phantine, Thebes, Abydos, escaped
the destroyers, and though forced to certain formal
acts of submission, to an acknowledgment of the
Hyks6s suzerainty, and to the payment of an annual
tribute, retained a qualified independence. The
Theban monuments of the eleventh and twelfth
dynasties were undisturbed. Even in Lower Egypt
there were structures that suffered little or nothing at
the conquerors hands, being too humble to attract
his attention or too massive to yield to the means
of destruction known to him. Thus the pyramids
scarcely suffered, though it is possible that at this
time their sanctity was first violated and their con-
tents rifled. ‘The great obelisk of Usurtasen I, which
still stands at Heliopolis, was not overthrown. The
humbler tombs at Ghizch, so precious to the antiquary,
+ (Manuel d'Histoire Ancienne de 10 * voli. ps 360.
were for the most part untouched. _Amencmbat's
buildings in the Fayoum may have been damaged,
but they were not demolished. Though Egyptian
civilization received a rude shock from the invasion,
it was not altogether swallowed up or destroyed; and,
when the deluge had passed it emerged once more,
and soon reached, and ev surpassed, its ancient
glories.
‘The Hyks6s king who led the invasion, or who, at.
rate, was brought to the front in its course, bore,
we are told, either the name of Salatis, or that of
Saites. Of these two forms the second is undoubtedly
to be preferred, since the first has in its favour only the
single authority of Josephus, while the second is sup-
ported by Africanus, Eusebius, George the Syncellus,
and to a certain extent by the monuments. The
“tablet of four hundred years” contains the
of Sut-Aapehtias that of a king of Egypt who
have belonged to the Middle Empire, and this name
may fairly be regarded as represented in an abbre-
viated form by the Greck “Saites.” Saites, having
made himself absolute master of the Lower Country,
and forced the king of the Upper Country to become
his tributary, fixed his residence at Memphis, at the
same time strongly fortifying and garrisoning various
other towns in important positions. Of these the
most considerable was the city, called Auaris, or Avaris,
in the Sethroite nome, which lay east of the Pelusiac
branch of the Nile, and was probably not far from
Pelusium itself, if indeed it was not identical with that,
city. Another strong fort, by means of which the
Delta was held and overawed, seems to have been
DURATION OF THE HYKS IS RULE. 139
Zan or Tanis, now San, situated on what was called
the Tanitic branch of the Nile, the next most easterly
branch to the Pelusiac. A third was in the Fayoum,
on the site now called Mit-Fares. A large body of
troops must also have been maintained at Memphis,
if the king,as we are told, ordinarily held his court
there.
How long the Egyptians groaned under the
tyranny of the “Shepherds,” it is difficult to say.
‘The epitomists of Manetho are hopelessly at variance
‘on the subject, and the monuments are silent, or nearly
so. Moderns vary in the time, which they assign to
the period between two centuries and five. On the
whole, criticism seems to incline towards the shorter
term, though why Manetho, or his epitomists, should
have enlarged it, remains an insoluble problem. There
is but one dynasty of « Shepherd Kings” that has any,
distinct historical substance, or to which we can assign
any names, This is a dynasty of six kings only,
whose united reigns are not likely to have exceeded
two centuries. Nor does it seem possible that, if the
duration of the foreign oppression had been much
longer, Egypt could have returned, so nearly as she
id, to the same manners and customs, the same reli-
gious usages, the same rules of art, the same system of
government, even the very same proper names, at the
end of the period, as had been in use at its begin-
ning. One cannot but think that the Gouleversement
which Egypt underwent has been somewhat exagge-
rated by the native historian for the sake of rhetorical
effect, to enhance by contrast the splendour of the
New Empire,
140 THE GREAT INVASION,
In another respect, too, if he has not misrepresented
the rule of the “Shepherd Kings,” he has failed to do
it justice. He has painted in lurid colours the advent,
of the fore gn race, the war of extermination in wh
they engaged, the eruel usage to which they subjected
the conquered people; he has represented th
vaders as rude, savage, barbarous, bent on destru
careless of art, the enemies of progress and civiliza-
tion. He has neglected to point out, that, as time
went on, there was a sensible change. ‘The period of
constant bitter hostilities came to an end. Peace sue~
ceeded to war. In Lower Egypt the “ Shepherds”
reigned over quiet and unresisting subjects ; in Upper
ypt they bore rule over submissive tributaries.
Jer these circumstances a perceptible softening of
their manners and general character took place. As,
the Mongols and the Mandchus in China suffered,
themselves by degrees to be conquered by the superior
civilization of the people whom they had overrun and,
subdued, so the Hyksbs yielded little by little to the
influences which surrounded them, and_insensibly
ssimilated themselves to their Egyptian subjects.
hey adopted the Egyptian dress, titles, official lan-
guage, art, mode of writing, architecture. In Tanis,,
especially, temples were built and sculptures set up
under the later “Shepherd Kings,” differing little in
their ge F
periods. The foreign monarchs erected thei
at this site, which were sculptured by native arti
according to the customary rules of
art, and only differ from those of the earlie native
Pharaohs in the head-dress, the expression of the
REI ON OF THE HYKSOS. 143
countenance, and a peculiar arrangement of the
beard, A friendly intercourse took place during this,
period between the kings of the North, established at
is and Memphis, and those of the South, resident
frequent embassies were interchanged ;
eee eee,
floated down the Nile, past Thebes, to be employed,
by the “ Shepherds” in their erections at the southern
capitals
The “Shepherds” brought with them into Egypt
the worship of a deity, whom they called Sut or
Sutekh, and apparently identified with the sun. He.
was described as “the great ruler of heaven,” and
identified with Baal in later times. ‘The kings re-
garded themselves as especially under his protection.
‘At the time of the invasion, they do not seem to have
considered this deity as having any special connection
with any of the Egyptian gods, and they consequently
made war indiscriminately against the entire Egyp
Pantheon, plundering and demolishing all the temples
alike. But when the first burst of savage hostility
was gone by, when more settled times followed, and
the manners and temper of the conquerors. grew
softened by pacific intercourse with their subjects,
a likeness came to be seen between Sutekh, their own
ancestral god, and the “Set” of the Egyptians. Set,
in the old Egyptian mythology was recognized as,
“the patron of foreigners, the power which swept the
children of the desert like a sand-storm over the
fertile land.” He was a representative of physical,
but not of moral, evil ; a strong and powerful dit
worthy of reverence and worship, but less an object of
a4 THE GREAT INVASION.
love than of fear. ‘The “ Shepherds” acknowledged in
this god their Sutekh; and as they acquired settled
habits, and assimilated themselves to their subjects,
they began to build temples to him, after the Egyptian,
model, in their principal towns. After the dynasty had
borne rule for five reigns, covering the space perhaps of,
one hundred and fifty years,a king came to the throne
named Apepi, who has left several monuments, and
is the only one of the “Shepherds” that stands out
for us in definite historical consistency as a living and
breathing person. Apepi built a great temple to,
Sutekth at Zoan, or Tanis, his principal capital, com-
posed of blocks of red granite, and adorned it with
obelisks and sphinxes. ‘The obelisks are said to have
been fourteen in number, and must have been dis.
persed about the courts, and not, as usual, placed,
only at the entrance. The sphinxes, which differed
from the ordinary Egyptian sphinx in having a mane
likea lion and also wings, seem to have formed an
avenue or vista leading up to the temple from the
town. They are in diorite, and have the name of
Apepi engraved upon ther
The pacific rule of Apepi and his predecessors
allowed Thebes to increase in power, and her monu-
ments now recommence. Three kings who bore the
family name of Taa, and the throne name of Ra-
Sekenen, bore rule in succession at the southern
capital. The third of these, Taa-ken, or “Ta the
Victorious,” was contemporary with Apepi, and paid
his tribute punctually, year by year, to his lawful
suzerain, He does not scem to have had any desire
to provoke war ; but Apepi probably thought that he
APEPI AND ¥OSEPH. 145
was becoming too powerful, and would, if unmolested,
shortly make an effort to throw off the Hyksds yoke.
He therefore determined to pick a quarrel with him,
and proceeded to send to Thebes a succession of
embassies with continually increasing demands. First
of all he required Taa-ken to relinquish the worship
of all the Egyptian gods except Amen-Ra, the chief
god of Thebes, whom he probably identified with hi
own Sutekh, It is not quite clear whether Taa-ken
consented to this demand, or politely evaded it. At
any rate, a second embassy soon followed the first,
with a fresh requirement; and a third followed the
second. The policy was successful, and at last Taa-
ken took up arms. It would seem that he was suc-
cessful, or was at any rate able to hold his own ; for
he maintained the war till his death, and left it to his
suecessor, Aahmes.
‘There was an ancient tradition, that the king who
made Joseph his prime minister, and committed into
his hands the entire administration of Egypt, was
Apepi. George the Syncellus says that the synchron-
ism was accepted by all, It is clear that Joseph's arrival,
did not fall, like Abraham’s, into the period of the
Old Empire, since under Joseph horses and chariots,
are in use, as well as wagons or carts, all of w
were unknown till after the Hyks6s invasion. It is,
also more natural that Joseph, a foreigner, should
have been advanced bya foreign king than by a,
native one, and the favour shown to his brethren, who,
were shepherds (Gen. xlvi. 32), is consonant at any
rate with the tradition that it was a “Shepherd
King” who held the throne at the time of their
arrival, A priest of Heliopolis, moreover, would,
scarcely have given Joseph his daughter in marriage
unless at a time when the priesthood was in a state of,
depression, Add to this that the Pharaoh of Joseph
is evidently resident in Lower Egypt, not at Thebes,
which was the seat of government for many hundred
years both before and after the Hyks6s rule.
If, however, we are to place Joseph under one of
the “ Shepherd Kings,” there can be no reason why we,
should not accept the tradition which connects. him,
with Apepi. Apepi was dominant over the whole of
Egypt, as Joseph’s Pharaoh seems to have been. He
acknowledged a single god, as did that monarch
(Gen. xli. 38, 39). He was a thoroughly Egyptianized
king. He had a council of learned scribes, a magni-
ficent court, and a peaceful reign until towards its,
close. His1 dence w s in the Delta, either at Tanis
or Auaris, He was a prince ofa strong will, firm and,
determined ; one who did not shrink from init
great ch
somewhat arbitrary way. The arguments in favour
of his identity with Joseph's master are, perhaps, not.
wholly conclusive; but they raise a presumption,
which may well incline us, with most modern his-
torians of Egypt, to assign the touching story of
Joseph to the reign of the last of the Shepherds,
HOW THE HYKSOs WERE XPELLED FROM EGYP’
AY first sight it seems strange that the terrible
warriors who, inder Set or Saites, so easily reduced
Egypt to subjection, and then still further weakened
the population by massacre and oppression, should
have been got rid of, after two centuries or two cen.
turies and a half, with such comparative ease. But
the rapid deterioration of conquering races under cer-
tain circumstances is a fact familiar to the historian,
umites, Babylonians, Assyrians, Medes, Persians,
Greeks, rapidly succeeded each other as the dominant,
powerin Western Asia, each race growing weaker
and becoming exhausted, after a longer or a shorter
interval, through nearly the same causes. Nor are
the reasons for the deterioration far to seek. Each
race when it sets out upon its career of conquest
active, energetic, inured to warlike habits, simple i
its manners, or at any rate simpler than those which
it conquers, and, comparatively speaking, poor. It is
urged on by the desire of bettering its condition. If
it meets with a considerable resistance, if the conquest
‘oceupies a long space, and the conquered are with
difficulty held under, rebelling from time to time,
and making frantic efforts to throw off the yoke
ry8 ny 08: PELLED FROM EGYPT.
which galls and frets them, then the warlike habits
of the conquerors are kept up, and their dominion
may continue for several centuries. Or, if the nation
is very energetic and unresting, not content with its
earlier conquests, or willing to rest upon its oars, but
continual 1g out fresh enemies upon its borders,
and regarding war as the normal state of its existence,
then the centuries may be prolonged into millennia,
and it may be long indeed before any tendency to
decline shows itself; but, ordinarily, there is no very
prolonged resistance on the one side, and no very
constant and unresting energy on the other. A poor.
and hardy people, having swooped down upon one
that is softer and more civilized, easily carries all
before it, acquires the wealth and luxury which it
desires, and being content with them, seeks for
nothing further, but assimilates itself by degrees to
the character and condition of the people whom it
has conquered. A standing army, disposed in camps
and garrisons, may be kept up; but if there is a ces-
sation of actual war even for a generation, the seve-
rity of military discipline will become relaxed, the
use of arms will grow unfamiliar, the physical type
will decline, the belligerent spirit will die away, and
the conquerors of a century ago will have lost all the
qualities which secured them success when they made,
their attack, and have sunk to the level of their sub-
jects. When this point is reached, thoughts of rebel-
lion are apt to arise in the hearts of these latter ; the
old terror which made the conqueror appear irre-
sistible is gone, and is perhaps succeeded by contempt,
—the subjects feel that they have at least the advan-
POSITION OF THEB: S UNDER THEM. 149
tage of numbers on their side; they have also pro
ably been leading harder and more bracing
they sce that, man for man, they are physically
stronger than their conquerors; and at last they
rebel, and are successful.
In Egypt there was, further, this peculiarity—the
conquered people occupied two entirely distinct posi-
tions. In the Delta, the Fayoum, and the northern
Nile valley, they were completely reduced, and lived
intermixed with their conquerors, a despised class,
suffering more or less of oppression, In Upper Egypt
the case was different. There the people had sub-
mitted in a certain sense, acknowledged the Hyksos
monarchs as their suzerains, and indicated their sub-
jection by the payment of an annual tribute ; but they
retained their own native princes, their own admit
tration and government, their own religion, their own,
laws; they did not live intermixed with the new
comers ; they were not subject to daily insult or il
treatment; the fact that they paid a tribute did not
hinder their preserving their self-respect, and conse-
quently they suffered neither moral nor physical
deterioration. Further, it would seem to have been,
possible for them to engage in wars on their own,
account with the races living further up the Nile, or
with the wild tribesof the desert, and thus to mainta
warlike habits among themselves, while the Hyks0s
were becoming unaccustomed to them. The Ra-
Sekenens of Thebes, who called themselves “great”
and “very great,” had probably built up a considerable
power in Upper Egypt during the reigns of the later
“Shepherd Kings ;” had improved their military
150 XPELLED PROM Ei yen,
system by the adoption of the horse and the chariot,
which the Hyks6s had introduced ; had practised,
their people in arms, and acquired a reputation as
More particularly must thishave been the case with
‘ekenen IIL, the contemporary of Apepi. Ra
Sekenen the Third called himself “the great vietorious
ounded himself withacouncil of “mighty.
chiefs, captains, and expert leaders.” He acquired so
much repute, that he provoked Apepi’s jealousy before
he had in any way transgressed the duties which he
owed him as a feudatory. In the long negotiation
between the two, of which the “ First Sallier Papyrus”
gives an account, it is evident that, while Ra-Sekenen
has committed no act whereof Apepi has any right to
complain, he has awoke in him feelings of such hos-
tility, that Apepi will be content with nothing less
than cither unqualified submission to every demand,
that he chooses to make, or war @ outrance. Never
was a subject monarch more goaded and driven inte
rebellion against clination by over-bea
duct on the part of his suzerain than was Ra
by the last Shepherd King.” The disinclination of
himself and his court to fight is almost ludicrous:
they “are silent and in great dismay ; they know not
how to answer the messenger sent to them, good or
ill” Ra-Sekenen, powerful as he had become,
“victorious” as he may have been against Libyans
and negroes, and even Cushites, dreaded exceedingly
to engage in a struggle with the redoubted people
which, two centuries previously, had shown itself so
irresistible.
WAR FORCED UPON RA-SEKENEN. 154
Tt would seem, however, that he was forced to take
up arms at last. We have, unfortunately, no descrip-
tion of the war which followed, so far as it was con-
ducted by this monarch. But it is evident that
Apepi was completely disappointed in his hope of
crushing the rising native power before it had grown,
too strong. He had in fact delayed too late.
Sekenen, compelled to defend
aggre: , raised the stand:
independence, invited aid from all parts of Egypt,and
succeeded in bringing a large army into the field. At.
the first he simply held his own against Apepi, but
by degrees he was able to do more. The Hyks0s,
who marched against Thebes, found enemies rise up
against them in their rear, as first one and then
another native chief declared against them in this
or that city ; their difficulties continually increased;
they had to re-descend the Nile valley
trate their forces nearer home, But ea
ost ground. First the Fayoum was yielded, then
Memphis, then Tanis. At last nothing remained to
the invaders but their great fortified camp, Uar or
Auaris, which they had established at the time of,
their arrival upon the eastern frontier, and had ever
since kept up. In this district, which was strongly
fortified by walls and moats, and watered by canals,
derived from the Pelusiac branch of the Nile, they had.
concentrated themselves, we are told, to the number
‘of 240,000 men, determined to make there a final
stand against the Egyptians
Tt was when affairs were in this position that Ra-
Sekenen died, and was succeeded by a king of a
152 HYKSOS EXPELLED FROM EGYPT.
different family, the first monarch of the “ Eighteenth
Dynasty,” Aahmes. Aahmes was a prince of great
force of character, brave, active, energetic, liberal,
beloved by his subjects. He addressed himself at
‘once to the task of completing the liberation of his
country by dislodging the Hyks6s from Auaris, and,
driving them beyond his borders. With this object
he collected a force, which is said to have amounted
to nearly halfa million of men, and at the same time
placed a flotilla of ships upon the Nile, which was of
the greatest service in his later operations. Auaris,
was not only defended by broad moats connected
with the waters of the Nile, but also bordered upon
a lake, or perhaps rather a lagoon, of considerable
dimensions. Hence it was necessary that it should
be attacked not only by land, but also by water.
Aahmes seems to have commanded the land forces in
person, riding in a war-chariot, the first of which we.
have distinct mention. A favourite officer, who bore
the same name as his master, accompanied him,
sometimes marching at his side as he rode in hi
chariot, sometimes taking his place in one of the war-
vessels, and directing the movements of the flect.
After a time formal siege was laid to Auaris; the
feet was ordered to attack the walls on the side of
the lagoon, while the land force was engaged in
battering the defences elsewhere. Assaults were
made day after day with only partial success; but at
last the defenders were wearied outa panic seized
them, and, hastily evacuating the place, they retired
towards Syria, the quarter from which they had
originally come, Aahmes may have been willing,
AAHMES TAKES AUARIS. 153
that they should escape; since, if they had been
completely blocked in and driven to bay, they might
have made a desperate resistance, and caused the
Egyptians an enormous loss. He followed, however,
upon their footsteps, to 1 did_not
settle anywhere in his neighbourhood, and was not
content till they had crossed the desert and entered
the hill country of Palestine, Even then he still
hung upon their rear, harassing them and cutting off
their stragglers ; finally, when they made a stand at
Sharuhen in Southern Palestine, he laid siege to the
town, took it, and made a great slaughter of the
hapless defenders.
‘The war did not terminate until the fifth year of
Aahmes’ reign. Its result was the complete defeat
of the invading hordes which had held Lower and
nd their expulsion fro
ypt with such ignominy and loss that they made
no effort to retaliate or to recover themselves. Vast
numbers must have been slain in the battles, or have
perished amid the hardships of the retreat ; and many
thousands were, no doubt, made prisoners and carried,
back into Egypt as slaves. It is thought that these
captives were so numerous as to become an important,
clement in the population of the eastern Delta, and,
even to modify the character of the Egyptian race in,
that quarter. The lively imagination of M. Francois
Lenormant sees their descendants in the “strange
people, with robust limbs, an elongated face, and a
severe expression, which to this day inhabits the tract,
bordering on Lake Menzaleh.”*
+ 6 Manuel dHistote Ancinne de TO: vol kp. 368
154 HYKSOS EXPELLED FROM EGYPT.
Itis probable that Aahmes had for allies in his war
with the “ Shepherds” the great nation which adjoined
Egypt on the south, and which was continually grow-
ing in power—the Kashi, Cushites, or Ethiopians.
His wife appears by her features and complexion to
have been a Cushite princess, and the marriage is,
likely to have been less one of inclination than of
policy. The \s admired fair women rather
than dark ones, as is plain from the unduly light
complexions which the artists in their desire to flatter,
ordinarily assign to women, ‘well as from the attrac
tiveness of Sarah, even in advanced age. When a,
‘Theban king contracted marriage with an Ethiopian,
of ebon blackness, we are entitled to assume a political
motive; and the most probable political motive under
the circumstances of the time was the desire for
military assistance. Though in the early wars be-
tween the Kashi and the Egyptians the prowess of
the formei epresented as great, and the desig-
na e Cushites” is evidently used in
depres warlike qualities, yet the very
use of the epithet implies a feeling of hostility which
could scarcely have been provoked by a weak people.
And the Cushites certainly advanced in prowess and,
in military vigour as time went on. They formed the
most important portion of the Egyptian troops for
some centuries; at a later period they conquered
gypt, and were the dominant power for a hundred
years; still further on, they defied the might of
Persia when Egypt succumbed to it. Aahmes,
contracting his marriage with the Ethiopian princess,
to whom he gave the name of Nefertari-Aahmes—or
AAHMES HELPED BY THE CUSHITES. 157
the good companion of Aahmes”—\ fas, we may be
tolerably sure, bent on obtaining contingent of those
stalwart troops whose modern representatives are
either the Blacks of the Soudan or the Gallas of
the highlands of Abyssinia. The “ Shepherds” thus
yielded to a combination of the North with the South,
pptians with the Ethiopians, such as in
, on more than one occasion, drove the
Assyrians out of the country.
‘THOTHMES 1, IE FIRST GREAT EGYPTIAN
CONQUEROR.
TuornMes I, was the grandson of the Aahmes
who drove out the Hyksés. He had thus heredi-
tary claims to valour and military distinction. The
hiopian blood which flowed in his veins through
his grandmother, Nefertari-Aahmes, may have
him an additional touch of audacity, and certainly
showed itself in his countenance, where the short
depressed nose and the unduly thick lips are of the
Cushite rather than of the Egyptian type. Hit
father, Amen-hotep I, was a somewhat undistin-
guished prince; so that here, as so often, where
superior talent runs in a family, it scems to have
skipped a generation, and to have leapt from the grand~
sire to the grandson, Thothmes began his military
career by an invasion of the countries upon the Upper
Nile, which were still in an unsettled state, notwith-
standing the campaigns which had been ca
and the victories which had been gained in them,
during the two preceding reigns, by King Aahmes,
and by the generals of Amen-hotep. He placed a
flotilla of ships upon the Nile above the Second
Cataract, and supporting it with his land forces on
ACCE ON OF THOTHMES 1. 159
cither side of the river, advanced from Semneh, the
boundary established by Usur
lat. 21° 50" to Tombos, in lat. 199, conquering the
Nubian and Cushite, as he proceeded, and
ishing himself in personal
On one occasion, we
majesty became more furious than a
and placing an arrow on his bowstring,
directed it against the Nubian chief so surely that it

struck him, and remained fixed in his knee, where-
upon the chief “fell fainting down before the royal
diadem.” He was at once seized and madea prisoner;
his followers were defeated and dispersed; and he
himself, together with others, was carried off on board
the royal ship, hanging with his head downwards, to
the royal palace at the capital. This victory was the
160 THE FIRST GREAT EGYPTIAN CONQUEROR.
precursor of others ; everywhere “the Petti of Nubia
were hewed in pieces, and scattered all over their
lands,” till “their stench filled the valleys” At last a.
general submission was made, and a large tract of
territory was ceded. The Egyptian terminus was
pushed on from the twenty-second parallel to the
nineteenth, and at Tombos, beyond Dongola, an
inscription was set up, at once to mark the new’
fronticr, and to hand down to posterity the glor
of the conquering monarch. The inscription stil
remains, and is couched in inflated terms, which show
a departure from the old official style. ‘Thothmes
declares that “he has taken tribute from the nations
of the North, and from the nations of the South, as,
well as from tose of the whole earth ; he has laid hold,
of the barbarians; he has not let a single one of them
escape his gripe upon their hair; the Petti of Nubia
have fallen beneath his blows; he has made their
waters to flow backwards; he has overflowed their
valleys like a deluge, like waters which mount and,
mount. He has resembled Horus, when he took,
possession of his eternal kingdom ; alll the countries,
included within the circumference of the entire earth
are prostrate under his feet.” Having effected his
conquest, Thothmes sought to secure it by the ap-
pointment of a new officer, who was to govern the
newly-annexed country under the title of “ Prince of
uush,” and was to have his ordinary residence at
‘Semneh.
ished with his vietories in this quarter, and
ated with the delight of conquest, Thothmes,
on his return'to Thebes, raised his thoughts to a still,
HOW MOVED TO INVADE ASIA. 161
grander and more adventurous enterprize. Egypt
had a great wrong to avenge, a huge disgrace to wipe
out. She had been invaded, conquered, plundered,
by an enemy whom she had not provoked by any
aggression ; she had seen her cities laid in ashes, her
temples torn down and demolished, the images of
her gods broken to pieces, her soil dyed with her
children’s blood ; she had been trampled under the
iron heel of the conqueror for centuries; she had been,
exhausted by the payment of taxes and tribute; she
had had to bow the knee, and lick the dust under the
conqueror’s feet—was not retribution needed for all
this? True, she had at last risen up and expelled
her enemy, she had driven him beyond her borders,
and he scemed content to acquiesce in his defeat, and,
to trouble her no more; but was this enough? Did
not the law of eternal justice require something more?
«© Nee lex stor alls est
Quin nevis artiices arte perie sua.”
Was it not proper, fitting, requisite for the honour
of Egypt, that there should be retaliation, that the
aggressor should suffer what he had inflicted, should
be attacked in hisown country, should be made to feel
the grief, the despair, the rage, the shame, that he had
forced Egypt to feel for so many years; should expiate
his guilt by a penalty, not only proportioned to the
offence, but its exact counterpart? Such thoughts,
we may be sure, burned in the mind of the young,
warrior, when, having secured Egypt on the south, he
turned his attention to the north, and asked himself
the question how he should next employ the power
162. THE FIRST GREAT EGYPTIAN CONQUEROR.
that he had inherited, and the talents with which
nature had endowed him.
It is uncertain what amount of knowledge the
Egyptians of the time possessed concerning the in-
ternal condition, population, and resources, of the
continent which adjoined them on the north-east.
We cannot say whether Thothmes and his counsellors
could, or.could not, bring before their mind’s eye a
fairly correct view of the general position of Asiati
and form a reasonable estimate of the pro-
ities of success or discomfiture, if a great ex-
pedition were led into the heart of Asia. Whatever
may have been their knowledge or ignorance, it will
be necessary for the historical student of the present
day to have some general ideas on the subject, if he
is to form an adequate conception either of the dangers,
which Thothmes affronted, or of the amount of credit,
due to him for his victories. We propose, therefore,
in the present place, to glance our eye over the
previous history of Western Asia, and to describe, so
far as is possible, its condition at the time when
‘Thothmes began to contemplate the invasion which
it is his great glory to have accomplished.
Western Asia is generally allowed to have been
the cradle of the human race. Its more fertile portions,
were thickly peopled at a very early date. Monarchy,
it is probable, first grew up in Babylonia, towards the
mouths of the Tigris and Euphrates. But it was not
long ere a sister kingdom established itself in Susiana,
lam, the fertile tract between the Lower Tigri
and the Zagros mountains. The ambition of con-
quest first showed itself in this latter country, whence
STATE OF asia aT THE TIME, 163
Kudur-Nakhunta, about nc. 2300, made an attack
on Erech, and Chedor-laomer (about 1c. 2000)
established an empire which extended from the
Zagros mountains on the one hand to the shores of
the Mediterranean on the other (Gen, xiv. 1-4)
Shortly after this, a third power, that of the Hitt
grew up towards the north, chiefly perhaps in Asia
Minor, but with a tendeney to project itself southward
to the Mesopotamian region. Upper Mesopotamia,
Syria, and Palestine, were at this time inhabited by
weak tribes, each under its own chief, with no co-
erence, and no great military spirit. The chief of
these tribes, at the time when ThothmesI. ascended
the Egyptian throne, were the Rutennuin Syria, and
the Nahari or Nairi in Upper Mesopotamia. ‘The
two monarchies of the south, Elam and Babylon
were not in a flourishing condition, and exercised no
suzerainty beyond their own natural limits. They
were, in fact, a check upon each other, constantly.
ngaged in feuds and quarrels, which prevented either
from maintaining an extended sway for more than a
few years, Assyria had not yet acquired any great
distinetion, though it was probably independent, and,
ruled by monarchs who dwelt at Asshur (Kileh-
Sherghat). The Hittites, about .. 1900, had received,
fa severe check from the Babylonian monarch, Sargon,
and had withdrawn themselves into their northern
fortresses. Thus the circumstances of the time were,
on the whole, favourable to the enterprize of Thothmes.
No great organized monarchy was likely to take the
field against him, or to regard itself as concerned to
interfere with the exccution of his projects, unless #
164 THR FIRST GREAT FGYPTIAN CONOUI OR.
they assumed extraordinary dimensions. So long as
he did not proceed further north than Taurus, of
further cast than the western Khabour, the great
affluent of the Euphrates, he would come into contact,
with none of the “great powers” of the time; he
would have, at the worst, to contend with loose
confederacies of tribes, distrustful of each other, un-
accustomed to act together, and, though bra
possessing no disripline or settled military orgat
tion. At the same time, his adversaries must not be
regarded as altogether contemptible. The Philistines
and Canaanites in Palestine, the Arabs of the Sinaitie
and Syrian deserts, the Rutennu of the Lebanon and
of Upper Syria, the Nairi of the western Mesopo-
tamian region, were indi lly brave men, were
inured to warfare, had a strong love of independence,
nd were likely to resist with energy any attempt to
bring them under subjection. They were also, most
of them, well acquainted with the value of the horse
for military service, and could bring into the field a
number of war-chariots, with riders well accustomed
to their management. Egypt had only recently added
the horse to the list of its domesticated animals,
and followed the example of the Asiaties by or-
ganizing a chariot force. It was open to doubt
whether this new and almost untried corps would be
able to cope with the experienced chariot-troops of
Asia.
‘The country also in which military operations were
to be carried on was a difficult one. It consisted
mainly of alternate mountain and desert. First, the
sandy waste called El Tij—the “Wilderness of the
DESCRIPTION OF THE ToPOGRAPHY. — x65
Wanderings”—had to be passed, a tract almost wholly
without water, where an army must carry its own
supply. Next, the high upland of the Negeb would,
present itself, a n water may be pro-
‘cured from wells, and which in some periods of the
world’s history has been highly cultivated, but which
n the time of Thothmes was probably almost as
unproductiveas the desert itself, Then would come
the green rounded hills, the lofty ridges, and the deep
gorges of Palestine, untraversed by any road, in
places thickly wooded, and offering continually greater
obstacles to the advance of an army, as it stretched,
further and further towards the north. From Palestine
the Lebanon region would have to be entered on,
where, though the Coele-Syrian valley presents a
comparatively easy line of march to the latitude of
Antioch, the country on either side of the valley is
almost untraversable, while the valley itself contains,
many points where it can be easily blocked by a,
small force. The Orontes, moreover, and the Litany,
are difficult to cross, and in the time of ThothmesI
would be unbridged, and form no contemptible
obstacles. From the lower valley of the Orontes,
first mountains and then a chalky desert had to be
crossed in order to reach the Euphrates, which could,
only be passed in boats, or else by swimming.
Beyond the Euphrates was another dreary and in-
fertile region, the tract about Haran, where Crassus,
lost his army and his life.
How far Thothmes and his counsellors were aware
of these topographical difficulties, or of the general con-
dition of Western Asia, it is, as already observed, ira
possible to determine. But, on the whole, there are
reasons fot believing that intercourse between nation
and nation was, even in very early times, kept up,
and that each important country had its “intelligence
department,” which was not badly served. Merchants,
refugees, spies, adventurers desirous of bettering their
condition, were continually moving, singlyor in bodies,
from one land to another, and through them a consi-
derable acquaintance with mundane affairs generally
was spread abroad. The knowledge was, of course,
very inexact. No surveys were made, no plans of
cities or fortresses, no maps; the military force that
could be brought into the field by the several nations,
roughly estimated; but still, ancient con-
art off on their expeditions wholly
in the dark as to the forces which they might have to
encounter, or the difficulties which were likely to beset
their march.
‘Thothmes probably set out on his expedition into
Asia in about his sixth or seventh year. He was
accompanied by two officers, who had served his father
and his grandfather, known respectively as “ Aahmes,,
son of Abana,” and “ Aahmes Pennishem.” Both of
them had been engaged in the war which he had
conducted against the Petti of Nubia and their
Ethiopian allies, and both had greatly dis
themselves. Aahmes, the son of Abana, boasts that
he seven times received the prize of valour—a collar
of gold—for his conduct in the field ; and Aahmes
Pennishem gives a list of twent
to him as military rewards by three king
not appear that any resistance was offered to the
INVASION OF ASIA. 17
invading force as it passed through Palestine ; but in
Syria Thothmes engaged the Rutennu, and “exacted,
satisfaction” from them, probably on
part which they had taken in the Hyksos struggle;
after which he crossed the
the far more powerful nation of the Natri. TI Natri,
when first attacked by the Assyrians, had twent; three
cities, and as many kings; they were rich in horses
and mules, and had so large a chariot force that we
hear of a hundred and twenty chariots being taken
from them ina single battle. At this time the number
of the chariots was probably much smaller, for cach of
the two officers named Ahmes takes great credit to
himselfon account of the capture of one such vehicle.
It is uncertain whether more than a single battle was,
fought. All that we are told is, that “His Majesty,
having arrived in Naharina” (ée. the Natri country),
“encountered the enemy, and organized an attack.
His Majesty made a great slaughter of them ; an im-
mense number of live captives was carried off by Hit
Majesty.” These words would apply equally to a
single battle and to a series of battles. All that can
be said is, that Thothmes returned victorious from his
Asiatic expedition, having defeated the Rutennu and
the Natri, and brought with him into Egypt a goodly
booty, and a vast number of Asiatic prisoners.
The warlike ambition of ThothmesI. was satisfied
by his Nubian and Asiatc victories. On his return
to Egypt at the close of his Mesopotamian campaign,
he engaged in the peaceful work of adorning and
beautifying his capital cities. At Thebes he greatly
enlarged the temple of Ammon, begun by Amenem-
hat I, and continued under his son, the first Usurtasen,
by adding to it the cloistered court in front of the
central cell—a court two hundred and forty feet long,
by sixty-two broad, surrounded by a colonnade, of
which the supports were Osirid pillars, or square piers
with a statue of Osiris in front. This is the first
known example of the cloistered court, which became
afterwards so common ; though it is possible that
constructions of a similar character may have been,
made by the “Shepherd Kings” at Tanis, Thoth-
mes also adorned this temple with obelisks, In\ffont
of the main entrance to his court he erected two vast
monoliths of granite, cach of them seventy-five feet in,
height, and bearing dedicatory inscriptions, which,
indicated his piety and his devotion to all the chief
deities of Egypt
Further, at Memphis he built a new royal palace,
which he called “The Abode of Aa-khepr-ka-ra,” a,
grand building, afterwards converted into a magazine
for the storage of grain.
‘The greatness of Thothmes I. has scarcely been
sufficiently recognized by historians. It may be true
that he did not effect much; but he broke ground
ina new direction ; he set an example which led on to
grand results, To him it was due that Egypt ceased
tobe the isolated, unaggressive power that she had re-
mained for pechaps ten centuries, that she came boldly
to the front and aspired to bring Asia into subjection.
Henceforth she exercised a potent influence beyond .
her borde influence which affected, more or less,
all the western Asiatic powers. She had forced her
way into the comity of the great nations. Henceforth,
GREATNESS OF THOTHMES 1. 169
whether it was for good or for evil, she had to take
her place among them, to reckon with them, as they
reckoned with her, to be a factor in the problem which
the ages had to work out—What should be the general
march of events, and what states and nations should
most affect the destiny of the world,
cs
QUEEN HATASU AND HER MERCHANT FLEET,
Ps, or Hatasu, was the daughter of the great
ng, Thothmes the First, and, according to
some, was, during his later years, associated with him
in the government. An inscription is quoted in which
he assigns to her her throne-name of Ra-ma-ka, and
calls her Queen of the South and of the North.” But
it was not till after the death of her father that she
came prominently forward, and assumed a position
not previously held by any female in Egypt, unless it
were Net-akret (Nitocris). Women in Egypt had been,
it is true, from very carly times held in high estimation,
were their husbands’ companions, not their playthings
or their slaves, appeared freely in public, and enjoyed
much liberty of action. One of the ancient mythical
monarchs, of the time before Sneferu, is said to have
passed a law permitting them to exercise the sove-
reign authority. Nitocris of the sixth dynasty of
Manetho ruled, apparently, as sole queen ; and Sabak-
nefru-ra of the twelfth, the wife of Amenemhat IV.,
igned for some years conjointly with her husband.
Hatasu’'s position was intermediate between these.
Her father had left behind him two sons, as well as a
daughter; and the elder of these, according to Egyp-
HATASU AS REG NT FOR THOTHMES 1. 173
tian law, succeeded him, He reignd as Thothmes-
nefer-shau, and is known to moderns as Thothmes the
Second. He was, however,a mere youth, of a weak
and amiable temper ; while Hatasu, his senior by
some years, was a woman of great energy and of a
masculine mind, clever, enterprizing, vindictive, and,
unscrupulous. The contrast of their portrait busts is,
remarkable, and gives a fair indication of the character
of each of them. Thothmes has the pearance of a
soft and yielding boy: he has a lang hing eye, a
short upper lip, a sen: 1ous mouth and chin, Hatasu
looks the Amazon : she holds her head erect, has a
bold aquiline nose,a firmly-set mouth, and a chin that,
projects considerably, giving her an indescribable air
of vigour and resolution. The effect is increased, no
doubt, by her having attached to it the male appen-
dage of an artificial beard; but even apart from,
this, her face would be a strong one, expressive of
firmness, pride, and decision. It is thought that she
contracted a marriage with her brother, such unions
being admissible by the Egyptian marriage law, and
not infrequent among the Pharaohs, whether of the
‘earlier or the later dynasties. In any case, itis cer
that she took the direction of affairs under his reign,
reducing him to a cipher, and making her influence
paramount in every department of the government.
At this period of her life the ambition of Queen
Hatasu was to hand her name down to posterity as a
constructor of buildings. She made many additions
to the old temple of Ammon at Karnak
built at Medinet Abou, in the vicinity of Thebes,a
temple of a more elaborate character than any that.
174 QUEEN HATASU AND HER MERCHANT FLEBT.
had preceded it, the remains of which are still standing,
ind have attracted much attention from architects,
Egyptian temple-architecture is here seen tentatively
making almost its first advances from the simple
cell of Usurtasen I. towards that richness of com-
plication and multiplicity of parts which it ulti-
mately reached. Pylons, courts, corridors supported
by columns, pillared apartments, meet us here in
their earliest germ; while there are also indica-
tions of constructive weakness, which show that the
builders were aspiring to go beyond previous models.
‘The temple is cruciform in shape, but the two arms
of the cross are unequal. In front, two pylons of
moderate dimensions, not eacceding twenty-four feet
in height, and built with the usual sloping sides and
strongly projecting cornice, guarded a doorway which
gave entrance into a court, sixty fect long by thirty
broad. At the further end of the court stood 2 porch,
thirty fect long and nine deep, supported by four
square stone piers, emplaced at equal distances. The
porch led into the cell, a long, narrow chamber of
‘treme plainness, about twenty-five feet long by nine
ide, with a doorway at either end. At either side
of the cell were corridors, supported, like the porch, by
square piers, and roofed in by blocks of stone from,
nine to ten fect long. These blocks have in some
instances shown signs of giving way ; and, to counter.
act the tendency, octagonal pillars have been intro-
duced at the weak points, without regard to exact
regularity or correspondence. Behind the cell are
chambers for the officiating priests, which are six in
number, and on cither side of the porch ate also
HATASU ACTUAL QUEEN. m7
chambers, forming the arms of the cross, but of un-
equal dimensions. That on the left is nearly square,
about fifteen feet by twelve ; that on the right is ob-
long, twenty-seven feetby fifteen, and has needed the
support of two pillars internally, which seem, however,
to have been part of the original design. This chamber
is open towards the north-east, terminating in a porch
of three square piers.
‘The joint reign of Hatasu and Thothmes II. did
not continue for more than a few years, It is sus-
pected that she engaged in a conspiracy against him
in order to rid herself of the small restraint which
his participation in the sovereignty exercised upon
her, and was privy to his murder. But there is no
sufficient evidenceto substantiate these charges, which
have been somewhat recklessly made. All that dis-
tinctly appears is, that Thothmes II. died while he
was still extremely young, and when he had reigned
only a short time, and that after his death Hatasu
showed her hostility to his memory by erasing his
name wherever it occurred on the monuments, and,
substituting for it either her own name or that of her
father. She appears also at the same time to have
taken full possession of the throne, and to have been
accepted as actual sovereign of the Egyptian people.
She calls herself “The living Horus, abounding in
divine gifts, the mistress of diadems, rich in years, the
golden Horus, goddess of diadems, Queen of Upper
and Lower Egypt, daughter of the Sun, consort of
Ammon, living for ever, and daughter of Ammon,
dwelling in his heart.” Nor was she content,
with attributes which made acknowledgment of her
178 QUEEN HATASU AND HER MERCHANT FLEET,
sex, She wished to be regarded asa man, assumed,
male apparel and an artificial beard, and gave herself
on many of her monuments the style and title of a
king. Her name of Hatasu she changed into Hatasu-
Khnum-Ammon, thus identifying herself with two of
the chief Egyptian gods. She often represented her-
selfas crowned with the tal plumes of Ammon. She
took the titles of “son of the sun,” “the good god”
“lord of the two lands,” “beloved of Ammon, the
protector of ings.” A curious anomaly appears in
some of her inscriptions, where masculine and femi
nine forms are inextricably mixed up ; though spoken
of consistently as “the king,” and not “the queen,”
yet the personal and possessive pronouns which refer
to her are feminine for the most part, while sometimes
such perplexing expressions occur as “le roi qui est
bien aimée par Ammon,” or “ His Majesty herself.”
‘The legal position which Hatasu occupied during
the sixteen years shat followed the death of Thothmes
II. was probably that of regent for Thothmes IIL,
his (and her) younger brother; but practically she
was full sovercign of Egypt. It was now that she
formed her grand schemes of foreign commerce, and
had them carried out by her officers. First of all, she
caused to be built, in some harbour on the western
coast of the Red Sea,a flect of ships, certainly not
fewer than five, each constructed so as to be propelled
both by oars and sails, and each capable of accommo-
dating some sixty or seventy passengers. Of these
thirty were the rowers, whose long sweeps were to
plough the waves, and bring the vessels into port,
whether the wind were favourableor no; some ten or
THE FLEET SETS SAIL 181
twelve formed the erew ; and the remainder consisted
of men-at-arms, whose services, it was felt, might be
required,if the native tribes were not sufficiently im-
pressed with the advantages of commercial dealings
An expedition then started from Thebes under the
conduct of a royal ambassador, who was well furnished
with gifts for distribution among the barbarianc
and instructed to proceed with his fleet down the Red
Sea to its mouth, or perhaps even further, and open
communications with the land of “ Punt,” which was
in this quarter, “Punt” has been generally identified
with Southern Arabia, and it is certainly in favour of
this view that the chief object of the expedition was
to procure incense and spices, which Arabia is known,
to have produced anciently in profusion, But among
the other products of the land mentioned in the in-
scriptions of Hatasu, there are several which Arabia
could not possibly have furnished ; and the conjecture
has therefore Leen made that Punt, or at any rate the
Punt of this expedition, was not the Arabian penin-
sula, or any part of it, but the African tract outside
the Gulf, known to moderns as “the Somauli coun-
try.” However this may have been, it is certain that
the fleet weighed anchor, and sailed down the Red,
Sea, borne by favourable winds, which were ascribed
to the gracious majesty of Ammon, and reached their
destination, the Ta-neter, or “Holy Land ”—the
* abode of Athor,” and perhaps the original home of
Ammon himself—without accident or serious diffi-
culty. The natives gave them a good reception.
They were simple folk, living in rounded huts or
cabins, which were perched on floors supported by.
182 QUE! N HATAS J AND HER MERCHANT FLEET.
piles, probably on account of the marshiness of the
ground, and which had to be entered by means of
ladders. Cocoa-nut palms overshadowed the huts,
interspersed with incense trees, while neat them
flowed a copious stream, in which were a great variety
of fishes. The principal chief of the country was ac
tain Parihu, who was married to a wife of an extra-
ordinary appearance. A dwarf, hunchbacked, with a
drawn face and short, deformed legs, she can scarcely,
one would think, have been a countrywoman or tne

Queen of Sheba. She belonged, more probably, to
one of the dwarfish tribes of which Africa has so
many, as Dokos, Bosjesmen, and others. The royal
couple were delighted with their visitors, and
the presents which they received from them; they
made a sort of acknowledgment of the suzerainty of
the Pharaohs, but at the same time stipulated that the
peace and liberty of the land of Punt should be re-
FREE TRADE IN THE LAND OF PUNT. 183
spected by the E syptians. Perfect freedom of trade
was established. The Egyptians had permission to
enter the incense forests, and cither to cut down the
trees for the sake of the resin which they exuded, or
to dig them up and convey them to the ships. We
see the trees, or rather bushes, dug up with as much
arth as possible about their roots, then slung on
poles and carried to the sea-shore, and finally placed
upright upon the ships’ decks, and screened from the

hheat of the sun's rays by an awning. Thirty-one
trees were thus embarked, with the object of trans-
planting them to Egypt, where it was hoped that they
might grow and flourish. A large quantity of the resin
was also collected and packed in sacks, which were
tied at the mouth and piled up upon the decks.
Various other produets and commodities were likewise
brought to the beach by the natives, and exchanged
184 QUEEN HATASU AND HER MERCHANT FLE T.
for those which the Egyptians had taken care to,
bring with them in their ships’ holds. ‘The most prized
were gold, silver, ivory, ebony and other woods, cassia,
koh or stibium, apes, baboons, dogs, slaves, and
leopard skins. ‘The utmost friendliness prevailed
during the whole period of the Egyptians’ stay in the
country; and at their departure, a number of the
natives, of their own free-will, accompanied them to
gypt. Among these would seem to have been the
deformed queen al chiefs.
‘Thereturn journey to Thebes was effected partly by
wayof the Nile. No doubt the seagoing ships sailed,
back to the harbour from which they had started;
while the incense trees and other commodities were,
disembarkéd, and conveyed across the desert tract
which borders the Nile valley towards the cast ; but
instead of being brought to Thebes by land they were
re-shipped on board a number of large Nile boats, and.
conveyed down the river to the capital. ‘The day of
their arrival was made a grand galaday. All the
city went out to meet the returning travellers. There
was a grand parade of the houschold troops, and also
of those which had accompanied the expedition ; the
incense trees, the strange animals, the many products
of the distant country, were exhibited ; a tame leopard,
with his negro keeper, followed the soldiers; a band
of led Tamahu, engaged in a sort of sham-
fight or war-dance. The misshapen queen and the
chiefs of the land of Punt, together with a_number of
Nubian hunters from the region of Chent-hen-nefer,
which lay far up the course of the Nile, were con-
ducted to the presence of Hatasu, offered their homage
RBYOICINGS ON THE PLEET'S RETURN. 185
to her as she sat upon her throne, and presented her
with valuable gifts. “Homage to thy co 2
they said, “O Queen of Egypt, Sun beaming like the
sun-disk, Aten, Aral An offering was
then madeby Hatasu to the god Ammon; a bull was,
sacrificed, and two vases of the precious frankincense
presented to him by the queen herself: e was
likewise made and prayers offered to Queei
of Punt” and “ Mistress of Heaven.” ‘The incense trees
were finally planted in ground prepared for them
the day concluded with general festivity and rejo
‘The complete success of so important and difficult
an enterprize might well please even a great queen.
Hatasu, delighted with the result, did her best to pre-
vent it fading away from human remembrance by
buildinga new temple to Ammon, and representing
the entire expedition upon its walls. At Tel-cl-
Bahiri, in the valley of El-Assasif, near Thebes, she
found a convenient site for her new structure, which
she imposed upon four steps, and covered internally
witha series of bas-reliefs, highly coloured, depictin
the chief scenes of the expedition. Here are to be
seen, even at the present day, the ships—the most,
ancient representations of sea-going ships that the
world contains—the crews, the incense-trees, the chiefs
and queen of Punt, the native dwellings, the trees and
fish of the land, the arrival of the expedition at Theb.
in twelve large boats, the prostration of the native
chiefs before Hatasu, the festival held on the occasion,
and the offerings made to the gods. It is seldom that
any single event of ancient history is so profusely
illustrated as this expedition of Queen Hatasu, which,
186 QUEEN HATASU AND HER MERCHANT FLEET.
is placed before our eyes in all its various phases,
from the gathering of the fleet on the Red Sea coast
to the return of those engaged in it, in gladness and,
triumph, to Thebes.
After exercising all the functions of sovereignty for
fifteen years, during which she kept her royal brother
in a subjection that probably became very galling to
him, Hatasu found herself under the necessity of
admitting him to a share in the royal authority, and
allowed his name to appear on her monuments in a.
secondary and subordinate position. About this time
she was especially engaged in the ornamentation of
the old temple of Ammon &t Thebes, begun by Usur-
tasen I, and much augmented by her father, Thoth-
mes I. The chief of all her works in this quarter
were two obelisks of red granite, or syenite, drawn,
from the quarries of Elephantine, and set up before
the entrance, which her father had made in front of
Usurtasen’s construction. These great works are
tunexcelled,in form, colour, and beauty of engraving,
by any similar productions of Egyptian art, either
carlier or later. ‘They measure nearly a hundred feet
in height, and are covered with the most delicately,
finished hieroglyphics. On them Hatasu. declares
that she “has made two great obelisks for her father,
Ammon, from a heart that is full of love for him.”
hey are “of hard granite of the South, each of a
single stone, without any joining or division.” ‘The
summit of each, or cap of the pyramidion, is “ of pure
gold, taken from the chiefs of nations,” so that they,
“are seen from a distance of many leagues—Upper
and Lower Egypt are bathed in their splendour” ().
DEATH OF HaTasv. 187
Hatasu reigned conjointly with Thothmes TH, for
the space of seven years. ‘Their common monuments
have been found at the Wady Magharah,
and elsewhere, It is not probable that the relations
of the brother and sister during this period were very
cordial. Hatasu still claimed the chief authority, and,
placed her name before that of her brother on all
public documents. She was, as she has be n called,
“a bold, ambitious woman,” and evidently admitted,
with reluctance any partner of her greatness. Thoth-
mes IIL, a man of great ambition and no less,
ability, is not likely to have acquiesced very willingly
in the secondary position assigned to him, Whether
he openly rebelled against it, broke with Hatasu, and
deprived her of the throne, or even put her to death,
is wholly uncertain. The monuments hitherto dis-
covered are absolutely silent as to what became of
this great queen, She may have died a natural death,
opportunely for her brother, who must have wished to
find himself unshackled ; or she may have been the
victim of a conspiracy within the palace walls. All
that we know is that she disappears from history in,
about her fortieth year, and that her brother and suc-
‘cessor, the third Thothmes, actuated by a strong and
settled animosity, caused her name to be erased, as
far as possible, from all her monuments. There is
scarcely one on which it remains intact. The greatest
of Egyptian queens—one of the greatest of Egyptian
sovereigns—is indebted for the continuance of her
memory among mankind to the accident that the
stonemasons employed by Thothmes to carry out
his plan of vengeance were too carcless or too idle to,
188 QUEEN 1ATASU AND HER MERCHANT F EET.
effect the actual obliteration of the name, which they
everywhere marred with their chisels. Hatred, for
once, though united with absolute power, missed its
aim; and Hatasu’s great constructions, together with
her “Merchant Fleet,” are among the indisputable
facts of history which can never be forgotten.
XIL.
THOTHMES THE THIRD AND AMENHOTEP THE,
SECOND.
No sooner had Thothmes III. burst the leading-
strings in which his sister had held him for above
twenty years, then he showed the metal of which he
was made by at once placing himself at the head of
his troops, and marching into Asia. Persuaded that.
the great god, Ammon, had promised him a long,
career of victory, he lost no time in setting to work
to accomplish his glorious destiny. Starting from an
Egyptian post on the Eastern frontier, called Garu or
Zalu, in the month of February, he took his march
along the ordinary coast route, and in a short time
reached Gaza, the strong Philistine city, which was
already a fortress of repute, and. re rded as “the
key of 5} a.” ‘The day of his arrival was the anni-
ion, and according to his reckor
nty-third year. Gaza made
ce: its chief was friendly to the
and gladly opened his gates to the invading army.
Having rested at Gaza no more than a single night,
Thothmes resumed his march, and continuing to
skirt the coast, arrived on the eleventh day at a fortie
fied town called Jaham, probably Jamnia, Here he
190 THOTHMES 111. AND AMENHOTEP 11.
was met by his scouts, who brought the intelligence
that the enemy was collected at Megiddo, on the
edge of the great plain of Esdraelon, the ordinary
battle-ficld of the Palestinian nations. ‘They con-
ed of “all the people dwelling between the river
of Egypt on the one hand and the land of Naharain
(Mesopotamia) on the other.” At their head was the
king of Kadesh, a great city on the upper Orontes,
which afterwards became one of the chief seats of the
Hittite power, but was at this time in the possession
of the Rutennu (Syrians). They wer strongly posted
at the mouth of a narrow pass, behind the ridge of
hills which connects Carmel with the Samaritan up-
land, and Thothmes was advised by his captains to
avoid a direct attack, and march against them by a
circuitous route, which was undefended. But the
intrepid warrior scorned this prudent counsel.“ His
generals,” he said, “ might take the roundabout road,
if they liked; Ze would follow the straight one.”
‘The event justified his determination. Megiddo was
reached in a week without loss or difficulty, and a
great battle was fought in the fertile plain to the
north-west of the fortress, in which the Egyptian
king was completely victorious, and his enemies were
scattered like chaff before The Syrians must
have fled precipitately at the first attack ; for they
lost in killed no more than cighty-three, and in
prisoners no more than two hundred and forty, or
according to another account three hundred and forty,
while the chariots taken were nine hundred and
twenty-four, and the captured horses 2,132. Megiddo
was near at hand, and the bulk of the fugitives would
FIRST SYRIAN CAMPAIGN OF THOTHMES. 191
reach easily the shelter of its walls. Others may
have dispersed themselves among the mountains. The
Syrian camp was, however, taken, together with vast
treasures in silver and gold, lapis lazuli, turquoise, and,
alabaster; and the son of the king of Kadesh fell,
into Thothmes’ hands. Megiddo itself, soon after-
wards, surrendered, as did the towns of Inunam,
igas, and Hurankal or Herinokol, An immense
in corn and cattle was also carried off.
‘Thothmes returned to Egypt in triumph, and held a
prolonged festival to Ammon-Ra in Thebes, accom-
panied by numerous sacrifices and offerings. Among
the last we find included three of the cities take
from the Rutennu, which were assigned to the god in
order that they might “supply a yearly contribution
to his sacred food.”
It is a familiar saying, that “increase of appetite
doth grow by what it feeds on.” Thothmes certainly
found his appetite for conquest whetted, not satiated,
by his Syrian campaign, If we may trust M.
Lenormant, he took the field in the very year that
followedhis victory of Megiddo, and after traversing
the whole of Syria, and ravaging the country about
Aleppo, proceeded to Carchemish, the great Hittite
town on the Upper Euphrates, and there crossed the
river into Naharain, or Mesopotamia, whence he
carried off a number of prisoners. Two other cam-
paigns, which cannot be traced in detail, belong to
the period between his twenty-fourth and his twenty-
ninth year. Thenceforward to his fortieth year his
military expeditions scarcely knew any cessation. At
‘one time he would embark his troops on board a fleet,
392 THOTHMES III. AND AMENHOTEP 11.
and make descents upon the coast of Syria, coming
as unexpectedly and ravaging as ruthlessly as the
Normans of the Middle Ages. He would cut down
the fruit trees, carry off the crops, empty the maga-
zines of grain, lay hands upon all valuables that were
readily removable, and carry them on board his ships,
returning to Egypt with a goodly store of gold and,
silver, of lapis lazuli and other precious stones, of
vases in silver and in bronze, of corn, wine, incense,
balsam, honey, iron, lead, emery, and male and female
slaves. At another, he would march by land, besiege
and take the inland towns, demand and obtain the
sons of the chiefs as hostages, exact heavy war con-
tributions, and bring back with him horses and,
chariots, flocks and herds, strange animals, trees, and
plants.
Of all his expeditions, that undertaken in his
thirty-third year was perhaps the most remarkable.
Starting from the country of the Rutennu, he on this,
occasion directed the main force of his attack upon
the Mesopotamian region, which he ravaged far and
wide, conquering the towns, and “ reducing to a level
plain the strong places of the miserable land of
Naharain,” capturing thirty Kings or chiefs, and
erecting two tablets in the region, to indicate its sub-
jection/ It is possible that he even crossed the Tigris
into Adiabene or the Zab country, since he relates
that on his return he passed through the town of Ni
or Nini, which many of the best historians of Egypt,
identify with Nineveh. Nineveh was not now (about,
BC. 1500) the capital of Assyria, which was lower
down the Tigris, at Asshur or Kileh Sherghat, but
THOTHMES INVADES MESOPOTAMIA. 193
was onlya provincial town of some magnitude. Still,
it was within the dominions of the Assyrian monarch
of the time, and any attack upon it would have been,
an insult and a challenge to the great power of Upper
Mesopotamia, which ruled from the alluvium to the
mountains. It is certain that the king of Assyria did,
accept the challenge, but preferred to avoid an
encounter with the Egyptian troops. Both at this
time and subsequently he sent envoys with rich,
presents to court the favour of Thothmes, who ac-
cepted the gifts as “tribute,” and counted ‘the chief
of Assuru” among his tributaries. Submission was
also made to him at the same time by the “ prince of
Senkara,” a name which still exists in the lower
Babylonian marsh region, Among the gifts which
this prince sent was “lapis lazuli of Babylon.” It
is an exaggeration to represent the expedition as
having resulted in the conquest of the great empires
of Assyria and Babylon; but it is quite true to say
that it startled and shook those empires, that it filled
them with a great fear of what might be coming, and,
brought Egypt into the position of the prineipai
military power of the time. Assyrian influence
especially was checked and curtailed. ‘There is reason
to believe, from the Egyptian remains found at Arban
on the Khabour,! that Thothmes added to the
Egyptian empire the entire region between the Eu-
phrates and its great eastern affiuent—a broad tract
of valuable territory—and occupied it with permanent
garrisons. The Assyrian monarch bought off the
further hostility of his dangerous neighbour by an
* Layard, Nineveh and Babylon,” pp. 280-282
194 | THOTHMES 111. AND AMENHOTEP 1
annual embassy which conveyed rich gifts to the
court of the Pharaohs, gifts that were not recipro-
cated. Among these we find enumerated gold and,
silver ornaments, lapis lazuli, vases of Assyr
(alabaster ?), slaves, chariots adorned with
silver, silver dishes and silver beaten out into sheets
incense, wine, honey, ivory, cedar and sycomore wood,
mulberry trees, vines, and fig trees, buffaloes, bulls,
and a gold habergeon with a border of lapis laz
A curious episode of the expedition is related by
Amenemheb, an officer who accompanied it, and was
in personal attendane> upon the Egyptian monarch.
It appears that in the time of Thothmes II. the
elephant haunted the woods and jungles of the Meso-
potamian region, as he now does those of the penin-
sula of Hindustan, ‘The huge unwieldy beasts were
ally abundant in the neighbourhood of Ni or
the country between the middle Tigris and the
Zagros range. As Amenemhat I. had delighted in the
chase of the lion and the crocodile, so Thothmes III,
no sooner found a number of elephants withn his
reach than he proceeded to hunt and kill them,
mainly no doubt for the sport, but partly in order to,
obtain their tusks. No fewer than a hundred and,
twenty are said to have been killed or taken. On
one occasion, however, the monarch ran a great risk.
He was engaged in the pursuit of a herd, when the
“rogue,” or leading elephant, turned and made a rush,
at the royal sportsman, who would probably have
fallen a victim, gored by a tusk or trampled to death,
under the huge beast’s feet, had not Amenemheb,
hastened to the rescue, and by wounding the creature's
FURTHER WARS IN SYRIA AND MB: POTAMIA. 195
trunk drawn its rage upon himself, The brute
was then, after a short strug , overpowered and
captured.
Further expeditions were led by Thothmes into A:
his thirty-fourth, thirty-fifth, thirty-eighth, thirty
fortieth, and forty-second years ; but in nor
of them does he seem to have outdone the exploits
of the great campaign of the year 33. The brunt
of his attacks at this time fell
Tahai, of northern Pheenicia, and upon the
the Mesopotamian region, who continually rebelled,
and had to be reconquered. ‘The Rutennu seem for
the most patt to have paid their tribute without re-
sistance and without much difficulty. ‘This may have
been partly owing to the judicious system which
Thothmes had established among them, whereby
cach chief was forced to give a son or brother as,
hostage for his good behaviour, and if the hostage
died to send another in his place.
not because the tribute was light, since it consisted
of a number of slaves, sil ses of the weight of
762 pounds, nineteen chariots, 276 head of cattle,
1,622 goats, several hundredweight of iron and lead,
a number of suits of armour, and “all kinds of good,
plants” The Rutennu had also to supply the stations
along the military road, whereby Thothmes kept up
the communications between Egypt and Mesopo-
potamia, with bread, wine, dates, incense, honey, and,
figs.
‘While thus engaged in enlarging the limits of his
‘empire towards the north and the north-east, the care-
fal monarch did not allow the regions brought under
196 THOTHuES 111. AND AMEXHOTEP 11.
Egyptian influence by former rulers to escape him.
He took a tribute of gold, spices, male and female
slaves, cattle, ivory, ebony, and panther skins from the
and of Punt, of cattle and slaves from Cush, and of
the same products from the Uauat. Altogether he
is said to have carried off from the subject countries
above 11,000 captives, 1,670 chariots, 3,639 horses,
4491 of the larger cattle, more than 35,000 goats,
silver to the amount of 3,940 pounds, and gold to the
amount of 9.084 pounds. He also conveyed to Egypt,
from the conquered lands enormous quantities of
corn and wine, together with incense, balsam, honey,
ivory, ebony and other rare woods, lapis lazuli, fur-
ture, statues, vases, dishes, basins, tent-poles, bows,
habergeons, fruit trees, live birds, and monkeys!
With a curiosity which was insatiable, he noted all,
that was strange or unusual in the lands which he
visited, and sought to introduce the various novelties,
into his own proper country. Two unknown kinds
of birds, and a variety of the goose, which he found,
in Mesopotamia, and transported from the valley of
the Khabour to that of the Nile, are said to have
been “dearer to the king than anything else.” His,
artists had instructions to make careful studies of the
different objects, and to represent them faithfully on
his monuments. We see on these “water-lilies as
high as trees, plants of a growth like cactuses, all
sorts of trees and shrubs, leaves, flowers, and fruits,
including melons and pomegranates; oxen and
calves also figure, and among them a wonderful
animal with three horns. ‘There are likewise herons,
sparrow-hawks, geese, and doves. All these objects,
NAVAL POWER OF THOTHMES. 197
appear gaily intermixed in the pictures, as suited the
mple childlike conception of the artist.”* An in-
scription tells the intention of the monarch. “Here,”
it runs, “ are all sorts of plants and all sorts of flowers,
of the Holy Land, which the king discovered when
he went to the land of Ruten to conquer it. Thus
says the king—I swear by the sun, and I call to
witness my father Ammon, that all is plain truth;,
there is no trace of deception in that which I relate.
What the splendid soil brings forth in the way of
productions,I have had portrayed in these pictures,
with the intention of offering them to my father
Ammon, as a memorial for all times.
Besides his army, Thothmes also maintained a
naval force, and used it largely in his expeditions.
According to one writer, he placed a fleet on the
Euphrates, and in an action which took place with the
Assyrians, defeated and chased the enemy fora dis-
tance of between seven and eight miles. He certainly
upon some occasions made his attacks on Syria and
Phoenicia from the sea; nor is it improbable that,
his maritime forces reduced Cyprus (which was con-
quered and held in a much less flourishing period by
Amasis) and plundered the coast of Cilicia; but a
judicious criticism wil scarcely extend the voyages
of his fleet, as has been done by another writer, to
Crete, and the islands of the AEgean, the sea-boards
of Greece and Asia Minor, the southern coast of Italy,
Algeria, and the waters of the Euxine! There is no,
evidence in the historical inscriptions of Thothmes of
any such far-reaching expeditions. ‘The supposed
+ Brugich, History of Egypt,” vol. Pp. 367, 368.
198 THOTHMES 111, AND AMENHOTEP 11.
evidence for them is in a song of vietory, put into the
mouth of the god, Ammon, and inscribed on one of
the walls of the great temple of Karnak. The song
is interesting, but it scarcely bears out the deductions,
that have been drawn from it, as will appear from the
subjoined translation,
(Annoy loguitur)
T.eame, an thou smotes the princes of Zahi
Tseatered them under thy feet overall ther lands$
mde them regard thy Holiness asthe Basing san
‘Tho shinest fm sight of them in my frm,
Tame, and thou smotest them that dwell in Asia;
"Thou tokestexptive the goatcherds of Ruten3
ade them behold thy Holiness in thy royal adornments,
AS thou graspest thy weapons in the war-eharot,
and thos smotest the land of the
‘Thou marchedst against the dwellers in the Holy Land
made them behold thy Holiness the star Canopas,
‘Which sends forth its heat and disperses the dew.
nd thon smotest the land ofthe West ;
Kefa and Asehi (Ze. Phoenicia and Cypras) hel th cin fears
ade them look upon thy Holiness asa young bi
Courageous, with sharp horns, which none ean approach,
.eame, and thos smotest the subjects oftheir Lords
The land of Mathen trembled fr fear of thee;
Tinade them look upon thy Holiness as upon a erocodils,
‘Tenribe inthe waters, not to be encountered
cam, and thos smotest them that dwelt fn the Great Sea¢
‘The inhabitants of the isles wereataid of thy waren
Tmade them behold thy Holiness asthe Avenger,
Who shes himself atthe back of his victim.
LLexme, an thos smotest the land of the Tabenn 5
‘The people of Uten submitted themselves to thy power
Timatle them see thy Holines as a lion, fierce of eye,
‘Who leaves his den and stalks through the vallys.
GREAT BUILDINGS OF THOTHMES. 199
‘Leame, and thos smotest the hiner (i. nowthern) lands:
‘The circuit of the Great Sea is bound in thy grasp;
Timade them bebold thy Holiness asthe hovering hawk,
‘Which scizes with his glance whatever pleases hi
Tame, and thou smotest the lands in front;
‘Thowe that sat upon the sand thow carriedst away captives
Tae them behold thy Holiness ike the jackal ofthe South,
‘Which passes through the lan asa hidden wanderer,
Teame, and thou smotest the nomad te
Even tothe land of Shut, which thoubi
made them behold thy Holiness lke thy pair of bothers,
Whose hands Ihave united to give thee power!
It is impossible to conclude this sketch of Thoth-
mes III. without some notice of his buildings. He
was the greatest of Egyptian conquerors, but he was
also one of the greatest of Egyptian builders and
patrons of art. The grand temple of Ammon at
‘Thebes was the especial object of his fostering care;
and he began his career of builder and restorer by.
repairs and restorations, which much improved and,
beautified that edifice. Before the southern propyliea
he re-erected, in the first year of his independent
reign, colossal statues of his father, Thothmes I., and
his grandfather, Amenhotep,which had been thrown,
down in the troublous time succeeding Thothmes the
First's death. He then proceeded to rebuild the
central sanctuary, the work of Usurtasen I, which
had probably begun to decay, and, recognizing its
importance as the very fenetrale of the temple, he
resolved to reconstruct it in granite, instead of
common stone, that he might render it, practically,
*Bragsch, History of Egypt" (fist el. 1879), vol. i. pp. 374, 372
200 THOTHMES
imperishable. With a reverence and a self-restraini
that it might be wished restorers possessed more com-
monly, he preserved all the lines and dimensions of,
the ancient building, merely reproducing in a better
material the work of his great predecessor. Having,
accomplished this pious task, he gave avent to his
constructive ambition bya grand addition to the temple
on its eastern side. Behind the cell, at the distance of
about a hundred and fifty feet, he erected a magni-
ficent hall, or pillared chamber, of dimensions. pre-
viously unknown in Egypt, or elsewhere in the world,
at he time—an oblong square, one hundred and forty-
three fect long by fifty-three fect wide, or nearly half
as large again as the nave of Canterbury Cathedral.
‘The whole of the apartment was roofed in with slabs
of solid stone; it was divided in its longest direction
into five avenues or vistas by means of rows of pillars,
and piers, the former being towards the centre, and
attaining a height of thirty feet, with bell capitals,
and the latter towards the sides, with a height of
twenty feet. This arrangement enabled the building,
to be lighted by means of a clerestory, in the manner
shown by the accompanying woodcut. In connection
with this noble hall, on three sides of it, northwards,
eastwards, and southwards, Thothmes further erected,
chambers and corridors, partly open, partly supported,
by pillars, which might form convenient store-chambers
for the vestments of the priests and the offerings of
the people,
Thothmes also added propylzea to the temple on
the south, and crected in front of the grand entrance
‘—<iwhich was (as usual) between the pylons of the
PILLARED HALL AND OBELISKS. 201
Propyliea, two or perhaps four great obelisks, one of
which exists to the present day, and is th
most magnificent of all such monument:
It stands in front of the Church of St. John L
at Rome, and has height of a hundred and five feet,
exclusive of the base, with a width diminishing from
nine feet six inches to eight fect seven inches. It is
mated to weigh above four hundred and fity tons,
and covered with well-cut hieroglyphics. No other
obelisk approaches within twelve feet of its elevation,
or within fifty tons of its weight. Yet, if we may
believe an inscription of Thothmes, found on the spot,
the pair of obelisks whereof this was one shrank i nto

insignificance in comparison with another pair, also
placed by him before his propylea, the height of
which was one hundred and eight cubits, or one
hundred and sixty-two feet, and their weight con-
sequently from seven hundred to eight hundred tons!
As no trace has been found of these monsters, and as
it seems almost impossible that they should have
been removed, and highly improbable that they could
have been broken up without leaving some indication
of their existence, perhaps we may conclude that they
were designed rather than execnted, and that the
202 II, AND AMENHOTEP Il.
inseri mn was set up in anticipation of an achieve-
ment contemplated but never effected.
Other erections of the Great Thothmes are the
enclosure of the famous Temple of the Sun at Helio
polis, the temple of Phthah at Thebes, the small temple
at Medinet-Abou, a temple to Kneph adorned with
obelisks at Elephan nd a series of temples and
monuments erected at Ombos, Esneh, Abydos,
Coptos, Denderah, Eilcithyia, Hermonthis, and Meme.
phis in Egypt, and at Amada, Corte, Talmis, Pselcis,
Semneh, Koummeh, and Nap ta in Nubia, Exten-
sive ruins of many of these buildings still remain,
particularly at Koummeh, Semneh, Napata, Denderab,,
and Ombos. Altogether, Thothmes III. is pro-
nounced to have left behind him more monuments,
than any othi Pharaoh excepting Rameses II, and
though occasional showing himself,as a builder, some-
what capricious and whimsical, still, on the whole, to
have worked in a pure style and proved that he was,
not deficient in good taste
It has happened, moreover, by a curious train
of circumstances, that Thothmes III. is, of all the
Pharaohs, the one whose great works are most widely
diffused, and display Egyptian skill and taste to the
largest populations, and in the most important cities,
of the modern world, Rome, as we have seen, pos-
sesses his grandest obelisk, which is at the same time
the greatest of all extant monoliths. ‘The millions,
who have flocked to Rome in all ages have learnt the
lesson of Egyptian greatness from the monument
erected before the Church of St. John Lateran, Con-
* Wilkinson in Rawlinson’ Herodotus,” vo. fp. 302
THOTHMES COMPARED TO ALEXANDER. 203
stantinople holds an obelisk of Thothmes IIL, which,
is placed in the middle of the Atmeidan. London
has put on its embankment, half-way between St.
Paul’s and the Palace and Abbey of Westminster,
another obelisk of the same monarch, erected origi-
nally at Heliopolis, thence removed to Alexandria
by Augustus, and now adorning the banks of the
Thames, nearly in the centre of the most populous,
city that the world has ever seen. ‘The companion
‘monument, after having, similarly, stood at Heliopolis
for fifteen centuries, and then at Alexandria for
eighteen, has crossed the Atlantic Ocean, and now,
teaches the million residents, and the tens of thou-
sands of visitors, of New York what great things
could be done by the Egyptian engineers and artists,
of the time of the eighteenth dynasty.
‘Thothmes ITT. has been called “the Alexander of
Egyptian history.” The phrase is at once exagge-
rated and misleading. It is exaggerated as applied
to his military ability; for, though beyond a doubt,
this monarch was by far the greatest of Egyptian con
querors, and possessed considerable military talent,
‘much personal bravery, and an energy that has seldom,
been exceeded, yet, on the other hand, his task was
trivial as compared with that of the Macedonian
general, and his achievements insignificant. Instead,
of plunging with a small force into the midst of popu:
Jous countries, and contending with armies ten or
twenty times as numerous as his own, defeating them,
and utterly subduing a vast empire, Thothmes
marched at the head of a numerous disciplined army
into thinly peopled regions, governed by petty chiefs
204 THOTHMES 111. AND AMENHOTEP 11.
jealous one of another, fought scarcely a single great
battle, and succeeded in conquering two regions of a
moderate size, Syria and Upper Mesopotamia, as far
asthe Khabour river. Alexander overran and sub-
dued the entire tract between the A®gean and the
Sutlej, the Persian Gulf and the Oxus. He conquered
Egypt, and founded a dynasty there which endured,
for nearly three centuries. Thothmes subdued not a
tenth part of the space, and the empire which he.
established did not endure for much more than a
century. It is thus absurd to compare Thothmes IT.
to Alexander the Great as a conqueror.
Alexander was, besides, much more than a con-
queror; he was a first-rate administrator. Had he
lived twenty years longer he would probably have
built up a universal monarchy, which might have
lasted for a millenium. As it was, he so organized
the East that it continued for nearly three centuries
mainly under Greek rule, in the hands of the monarchs
who are known as his “ successors.” Thothmes IIL,
on the contrary, organized nothing. He left his con-
quests in such a condition that they, all of them, re-
volted at his death. His successor had to reconquer
all the countries that had submitted to his father,
and to re-establish over them the Egyptian sove-
reignty.
In person the great Egyptian monarch was not
remarkable. He had a long, well-shaped, and some-
what delicate nose, which was almost in line with
forchead, an eye prominent and larger than that of
most Egyptians,a shortish upper lip,a resolute mouth,
with rather over-full lips, and a rounded, slightly,
PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF THOTHMES. 205
retreat ig chin. The expression of his portrait statues
is grave and serious, but lacks stre sth and det
nation. Indeed, there is something about the whole
countenance that is a little womanish, though h
reign of fifty-four years,
according to his own reckoning, having practically
exercised the sovereign power for about thirty two

of the fifty-four. His age at his death must have
been about sixty.
During these stirring time: what were the children
of Israel doing? We have supposed that Joseph was
minister of the last of the Shepherd Kings, under
whose reign his people had entered upon the peaceful
206 THOTHMES 111. AND AMENHOTEP Il.
occupation of the land of Goshen, where they were
received with hospitality by a population of the same
simple pastoral habits with themselves; and it seems
probable that, under Thothmes IIL, they were increas-
ing abundantly and waxing mighty, and that the
land between the Sebennytic and Pelusiac branches,
of the Nile was gradually being filled by them. Their
period of severe oppression had not yet begun ; there
had as yet arisen no sufficient reason for any measures,
of repression,such as were pursued by the new king who
“knew not Joseph.” The name and renown of the
great minister seems still to have protected his kins-
men in the peaceful enjoyment of their privileges in
the land that must by this time have lost for them
most of its strangeness.
‘Thothmes IIL, was succeeded by his son, Amen-
hotep, whom historians commonly term Amenophis,
the Second, ‘This king was a warrior like his father,
and succeeded in reducing, without much difficulty,
the various nations that had thrown off the authority,
of Egypt on receiving the news of his father’s death,
He even carried his arms, according to some, as far
as Nineveh, which he claims to have besieged and
taken ; he does not, however, mention the Assyrians
as his opponents. His contests were with the Nair,
the Rutennu, and the Shasu (Arabs) in Asia, with
the Tahennu (Libyans) and Nubians in Africa. On
all sides victory crowned his arms; but he stained
the fair fame that his victories would have other-
wise secured him by barbarous practices, and cruel
and unnecessary bloodshed. He tells us that at
Takhisa in northern Syria he killed seven kings
cr ELTIES OF AMENHOTE 207
his own hand, and he represents himself in the act of
destroying them with his war-club, not in the heat of
battle, but after they have been taken prisoners. He
further adds that, after killing them, he suspended
their bodies from the prow of the vessel in which he
returned to Egypt, and brought them, as trophies of
victory, to Thebes, where he hung six of the seven,
outside the walls of the city, as the Philistines hung
the bodies of Saul and Jonathan on the wall of Beth-
10, 12); while he had the seventh
conveyed to Napata in Nubia, and there similarly
exposed, to terrify his enemies in that quarter. It
has been said of the Russians—not perhaps without
some justice—“ Grattez le Russe et vous trouverez le
Tartare ;” with far greater reason may we say of the
ancient Egyptians, that, notwithstanding the veneer
of civilization which they for the most part present to
our observation, there was in their nature, eve
best of times,
could not be concealed, but was continually showing
itself.
Amenéphis II. appears to have had a short reign5
his seventh year is the last noted upon his monu-
ments. As a builder he was unenterprizing. One
temple at Amada, one hall at Thebes, and his tomb
at Abd-cl-Qurnah, form almost the whole of his known,
constructions. None of them is remarkable. Egypt
under his sway had a brief rest before she braced her-
self to fresh efforts, military and architectural.
XU
HOTEP Il, AND HIS GREAT WORKS
— THE
VOCAL MEMNON.
‘Tite fame of Amen-hotep the Third, the
of the great Thothmes, rests especially upon hit
Colossi, the grandest, if not actually the largest, that,
the world has ever beheld. Imagine sitting figures,
formed of a single solid block of sandstone, which
have sat on for above three thousand years, moulder-
ing gradually away under the influence of time and,
weather changes, yet which are still more than sixty,
fect high, and must originally, when they wore the
tall crown of an Egyptian king, have reached very,
nearly the height of seventy feet! We think a statue
vast, colossal, of magnificent dimensions, if it be as,
much as ten or twenty feet high—as Chantrey’s statue
of Pitt, or Phidias’s chryselephantine statue of
Jupiter. What, then, must these be, which are of a
size so vastly greater? Let us hear how they impress,
an eye-witness of world-wide experience. “There
they sit,” says Harriet Martineau, “together, yet,
apart, in the midst of the plain, serene and
still keeping their untired watch over the lapse of
ages and the eclipse of Europe. I can never believe
that anything else so majestic as this pair has been.
TWIN COLOSSI OF AMENHOTEP II. 2x8
conceived of by the imagination of art. Nothing
certainly, even in nature, ever affected me so unspeak
inderstorms in my childhood, nor any
aspect of Niagara, or the great lakes of America, or
the Alps, or the Desert, in my later years. . . The
pair, sitting alone amid the expanse of verdure, with
islands of ruins behind them, grew more striking to
us every day. To-day, for the first time, we looked
up to them from their base. The impression of sub-
Time tranquillity which they convey when seen from
distant points, is confirmed by a nearer approach.
‘There they sit, keeping watch—hands on knees, gazing
straight forward; seeming, though so much of the
face is gone, to be looking over to the monumental,
piles on the other side of the river, which became
gorgeous temples, after these throne-seats were placed
here—the most immovable thrones that have ever
been established on this earth !”*
‘The design of erecting two such colossi must be
attributed to the monarch himself, and we must estic
mate, from the magnificence of the design, the gran-
deur of his thoughts and the wonderful depth of his
ation; but the skill to execute, the
genius to express in stone such dignity, majesty, and
repose as the statues possess, belongs to the first-rate
sculptor, who turned the rough blocks of stone, hewn
by the masons in a distant quarry, into the glorious
statues that have looked down upon the plain for so
many ages. The sculptors of Egyptian works are,
general, unknown; but, by good fortune, in this par-
ticular ease, the name of the artist has remained on
++ Baste Life," vol pp. 8. 280.
212 AMENHOTEP Il. AND HIS GREAT WORKS.
record, and he has himself given us an account of
the feelings with which he saw them set up in the
places where they still remain, ‘The sculptor, who
bore the same name as his royal master, ze. Amen-
hotep or Amen-hept, declares in the exultation of his
heart: “ I immortalized the name of the king, and no,
one has done the like of me in my works. I executed
two portrait-statues of the king, astonishing for thi
breadth and height; their completed form dwarfed
the temple tower—forty cubits was their measure ;
they were cut in the spinndid sandstone mountain on,
either side, the eastern and the western, I caused to
be built eight ships, whereon the statues were carried,
up the river; they were emplaced in their sublime
temple; they will last as long as heaven. A joyful
event was it when they were landed at Thebes and,
raised up in their place.”
peculiar and curious interest attaches to one—
the more eastern—of the two statues. It was known
to the Romans of the carly empire as “The Vocal
Memnon,” and formed one of the chief attractions
which drew travellers to Egypt, from the fact, which
is quite indisputable, that at that time, for two c
turies or perhaps more, it emitted in the early morning,
a musical sound, which was regarded as a sort of
standing miracle. The fact is mentioned by Strabo,
Pliny the elder, Pausanias, Tacitus, Juvenal, Lucian,
Philostratus, and others, and is recorded by a number
of ear-witnesses on the lower part of the colossus itself
in inscriptions which may be seen at the present day.
Amenhotep, identified by the idle fancy of some Greek
‘or Roman scholar with the Memnon of Homer, son
THE VOCAL MEMNON, 213
of Tithonus and Te Dawn, who led an army of
Ethiopians to the assistance of Priam of Troy against
the Greeks, was regarded as a god, and to hear the
sound was not only to witness a miracle, but to
receive an assurance of the god's favourable regard.
For the statue did not emit a sound—the god did not
speak—every day. Si had to depart
disappointed altogether, sometimes they y had to make
a second,a third, or a fc before hearing the
desired voice. But stil it wasa frequent phenomenon ;
and a common soldier has recorded the fact on the
base of the statue, that he heard it no fewer than thir-
teen times. The origin of the sound, the time when
it began to be heard, and the circumstances under
which it ceased, are all more or less doubtful. Some
of those exceedingly clever persons who find priest-
craft everywhere, think that the musical sound was
the effect of human contrivance, and explain the
whole matter to their entire tion by “the jug-
glery of the priests” The priests either found a
naturally vocal piece of rock, and intentionally made
the statue out of it; or they cunningly introduced a
pipe into the interior of the figure, by which they
could make musical notes issue from the mouth at
their pleasure. It is against this view that in the
palmy days of the Egyptian hierarchy, the vocal
character of the statue was entirely unknown ; we
have no evidence of the sound having been heard
earlier than the time of Strabo (8.c. 25-10), when
Egypt was in the possession of the Romans, and the
priests had little influence. Moreover, the theory is
disproved by the fact that, during the two centuries of
214 AMENHOYEP Il, AND HIS GREAT WORKS,
the continuance of the marvel, there were occasions,
when Memnon was obstinately silent, though the
priests must have been most anxious that he should,
speak, while there were others when he spoke freely,
though they must have been perfectly indifferent. The
wife of a prefect of Egypt made two visits to the spot,
to no purpose; and the Empress Sabina, wife of the
Emperor Hadrian, was, on her first visit, also disap-
pointed, so that “her venerable features were in-
flamed with anger.” On the other hand, as already
mentioned, a common Roman soldier heard the sound
thirteen times.
With respect to the time when,and the circumsta
under which, the phenomenon first showed itself, all
that can be said is, that the earliest literary witness to
the fact is Strabo (about hc. 25); that the earliest of the
inscriptions on the base that can be dated belongs to,
the reign of Nero, and that it is at least questionable
whether the sound ever issued from the stone before
BC. 27. In that year there was an earthquake which
wrought great havoc at Thebes; and it is an acute
suggestion, that it was this earthquake which at once,
shattered the upper part of the colossus, and so,
affected the remainder of the block of stone that it
became vocal then for the first time. For centuries,
the figure remained a torso, and it was while a torso
that it emitted the musical tone—
* Dimiio magies resonabant Memnone chow
After a long interval of years, probably about A.D
174, that restoration of the monument took place
which is to be scen to the present day. Five blocks
THE VOCAL MEMNON. 215
‘of stone, rudely shaped into a form like that of the
unharmed colossus, were emplaced upon the forse,
which was thus reconstructed. The intention was to
do Memnon honour; but the effect was to strike him
dumb. The peculiar condition of the stone, which,
the earthquake had superinduced, and which made it
vocal, being changed by the new arrangement, the
sound ceased, and has been heard no more
It is a fact well known to scientific persons at the
present day, that musical sounds are often given
forth both by natural rocks and by quarried m:
of stone, in consequence of a sudden change of tem-
perature, Baron Humboldt, writing on the banks of
the Oronooko, says: “The granite rock on which we
lay is one of those where travellers have heard from
time to time, towards sunrise, subterraneous sounds,
resembling those of the organ. ‘The missionaries call
these stones /oxas de musica. ‘It is witcheraft) said
our young Indian pilot... . But the existence of a
phenomenon that scems to depend on a certain state,
of the atmosphere cannot be denied. The shelves of
rock are full of very narrow and deep crevices. They,
are heated during the day to about 50°. I often found
their temperature during the night at 30°. It may
easily be conceived that the difference of temperature
between the subterrancous and the external air would
attain its maximum about sunrise.” Analogous phe-
nomena occur among the sandstone rocks of El
Nakous, in Arabia Petra, near Mount Maladetta in
the Pyrenees, and (perhaps) in the desert between
Palestine and Egypt. “On the fifth day of my
journey,” says the accomplished author of ‘ Eothen,’
216 AMENHOTEP III. AND HIS GREAT WORKS.
“the sun growing fiercer and fiercer, . . . as T drooped
my head under his fire, and closed my eyes against
the glare that surrounded me, I slowly fell asleep—
for how many minutes or moments I cannot tell—
but after a while I was gently awakened by a peal of
church bells—my native bells—the innocent bells of
Marlen that never before sent forth their music beyond
the Blagdon hills! My first turally was that
I still remained fast under the power of a dream.
roused myself, and drew aside the silk that covered
my eyes, and plunged my bare face into the light. _
Then at least I was well enough awakened, but still
those old Marlen bells rang on, not ringing for joy,
but properly, prosily, steadily, merrily ringing ‘ for
church? Aftera while the sound died away slorcly;
it happened that neither I nor any of my party had a
watch to measure the exact time of its lasting ; but it
seemed to me that about ten minutes had passed be=
fore the bells ceased.”* The gifted writer proceeds
to givea metaphysical explanation ofthe phenomena;
but it may be questioned whether he did not hear
actual musical sounds, emitted by the rocks that lay
beneath the sands over which he was moving.
And similar sounds have been heard when the
stones that sent them forth were quarried blocks, no
longer in a state of nature, but shaped by human
tools, and employed in architecture. ‘Three members,
of the French Expedition, MM. Jomard, Jollois, and
Devilliers, were together in the granite cell_which,
forms the centre of the palace-temple of Karnak,
when, according to their own account, they “heard a
Kinglake, ““Bothen,” pp. 188, 189.
AMENHOTEP'S PALACE-TEMPLES. 217
sound, resembling that of a chord breaking, issue
from the blocks at sunrise. ictly the same com-
parison is employed by Pausanias to describe the
sound that issued from “the vocal Memnon.”
the whole, we may conclude that the musical
s of his remarkable colossus were unknown
king whom it represented. To them, in its
purpose and object, it belonged, not to Music, but
wholly to the sister art of Architecture. “The Pair”
sat at one extremity of an avenue leading to one of
the great palace-temples reared by Amenhotep ITI
a palace-temple which is now a mere heap of sand-
stone, “a little roughness in the plain.”
of the king was, that this grand edifice should be ap-
proached by a dromos, or paved way, eleven hundred
feet long, which should be flanked on either side by
nine similar statues, placed at regular intervals along
the road, and al representing himself, ‘The egotism,
of the monarch may perhaps be excused on account
of the grandeur of his idea, which we nowhere else
find repeated, avenues of sphinxes being common in
Egypt, and avenues of sitting human //e-sise figures
not unknown to Greece, but the history of art con-
taining no other instance of an avenue of colossi.
Another of Amenhotep’s palace-temples has been
less unkindly treated by fortune than the one just
mentioned. The temple of Luxor, or El-Uksur, on
the eastern bank of the river, about a mile and a
half to the south of the great temple of Karnak, is a
magnificent edifice to this day; and though some
portions of it, and some of its most remarkable
218 AMENHOTEP IIL, AND HIS GREAT WORKS.
features, must be assigned to Rameses II, yet still it
is, in the main, a construction of Amenhotep’s, and
must be regarded as being, even if it stood alone,
sufficient proof of his eminence as a builder. The.
length of the entire building is about eight hundred
feet, the breadth varying from about one hundred,
feet to two hundred. Its general arrangement com:
prised, first, a great court, at a diferent angle from,
the rest, being turned so as to face Karnak, In
front of this stood two colossal statues of the
founder, together with two obelisks, one of which,
has been removed to France, and now adorns the
centre of the Place de la Concorde at Paris. Be-
hind this was a great pillared hall, of which only the
two central ranges of columns are now standing
Still further back were smaller halls and numerous,
apartments, evidently meant for the king's residence,
rather than for a temple or place exclusively devoted,
to worship. The building is remarkable for its marked
affectation of irregularity. “ Not only is there a con-
siderable angle in the direction of the axis of the
building, but the angles of the courtyards are hardly,
ever right angles; the pillars are variously spaced, and,
pains seem to have been gratuitously taken to make
it as irregular as possible in nearly every respect.”*
Besides this grand edifice, Amenhotep built two
temples at Karnak to Ammon and Maut, embellished
the old temple of Ammon there with a new propylon,
raised temples to Kneph, or Khnum, at Elephantine
and built a shrine to contain his own image at Soleb
in Nubia, another shrine at Napata, and a third at
* Fergusson, “ Handbook of Arcitectute,” vol. i.p. 254
WARS OF AMENHOTEP 11, 2x9
Sedinga. He left traces of himself at Semneh, in
the island of Konosso, on the rocks between Phila
and Assouan, at El-Kaab, at Toora near Memphis,
ilis, and at Sarabit-el-Khadim in the Si
peninsula. He was, as M. Lenormant remarks,
prince essentiellement batisseur.” The scale and
number of his works are such as to indicate unremit-
ting attention to sculpture and building during the
cntire duration of his long reign of thirty-six years.
On the other hand, as a general he gained little
distinction. He maintained, indeed, the dominion
over Syria and Western Mesopotamia, which had
been established by Thothmes IIL, and his cartouche
has been found at Arban on the Khabour ; but there
is no appearance of his having made any additional
conquests in this quarter. The subjected peoples,
brought their tribute regularly, and the neighbouring
nations, whether Hittites, Assyrians, or Babylonians,
gave him no trouble. The dominion of Egypt over
Western Asia had become “an accomplished fact,”
and was generally recognized by the old native king-
doms, It did not extend, however, beyond Taurus
and Niphates towards the north, or beyond the
Khabour eastward or southward, but remained fixed
hin the limits which it had attained under the
ter in which Amenhotep warred
was towards Ethiopia. He conducted in person
several expeditions up the valley of the Nile, against
the negro tribes of the Soudan, But these attacks
were not so much wars as raids, or razzias. They
were not made with the object of advancing the
220 AMENHOTEP IIT. AND HIS GREAT WORKS.
Egyptian frontier, or even of extending Egyptian
influence, but partly for the glorification of the
monarch, who thus obtained at a cheap rate the credit,
of military successes, and partly—probably mainly—
for the material gain which resulted from them through,
the capture of highly valuable slaves. ‘The black,
races have always been especially sought for this
purpose, and were in great demand in the Egyptian
slave-market : ladies of rank were pleased to have for
their attendants negro boys, whom they dressed in a
fanciful manner; and the court probably indulged in a,
ilar taste. Amenhotep's aim was certa nly rather
to capture than to kill. In one of his most successful
s the slain were only three hundred and twelve,
while the captives consisted of two hundred and five
men, two hundred and fifty women, and two hundred,
and eighty-five children, or a total of seven hundred
and forty ; and the proportion in the others was
similar, ‘The trade of slave hunting was so lucrative
that even a Great King could not resist the tempta-
tion of having a share in its profits.
When Amenhotep was not engaged in hunting men
his favourite recreation was to indulge in the chase
of the lion, On one of his scarabsi he states that
between his first and his tenthyear he slew with his own
hand one hundred and ten of these ferocious beasts.
Lateronin his reign he presented to the priests who had
he charge of the ancient temple of Karnak a number
of live lions, which he had probably caught in traps.
The lion was an emblem both of Horus and of Tum,
ind may, when tamed, have been assigned a part in
‘ligious processions. It is uncertain what was Amen-
HIS. LION-HUNTING. 2ar
hotep’s hunting-ground ; but the large number of his
victims makes it probable that the scene of his ex-
ploitswas Mesopotamia rather than any tract bordering
on Egypt : since lions have always been scarce animals
in North-Eastern Africa, but abounded in Mesopo-
ia even much later than the time of Amenhotep,

and are not uncommon” there even at the present
day. We may suppose that he had a hunting pavilion
at Arban, where one of his scarabs has been found,
and from that centre beat the reed-beds and jungles
of the Khabour.
222 NHOTEP III. AND HIS GREAT WORKS.
In person, Amenhotep III. was not remarkable
His features were good, except that his nose was
somewhat too much rounded at the end; his expres-
sion was pensive, but resolute; his forehead high,
his upper lip short, his chin a little too prominent.
He left behind him a character for affectionateness,
lliness, and generosity. Some historians have
reproached him with being too much under female
influence ; and certainly in the earlier portion of his,
reign he deferred greatly to his mother, Mutemua,
and in the latter portion to his wife, Tii or Taia; but,
there is no evidence that any evil result followed,or
that these princesses did not influence him for good.
It is too much taken for granted by many writers that
female influence is corrupting. No doubt it is so in
some cases; but it should not be forgotten that there
‘are women whom to have known is “a liberal educa-
tion.” Mutemua and Ti may have been of the
number,
XIV.
KHUENATEN AND THE DISK-WORSHIPPERS,
ON the death of Amenhotep IIL, his son, Amen-
hotep IV., mounted the throne. Left by Amenhotep
IIL. to the guardianship of his mother, ii, who was
of some entirely foreign “e, he embraced a new
form of religion, which she ppears to have introduced,
and shocked the Egyptians by substituting,so far as
he found to be possible, this new creed for the old
polytheism of the country. ‘The heresy of Amen-
hotep IV. has been called “ Disk-worship;” and he,
ind the next two or three kings, are known in Egyp-
tian history as “the Disk-worshippers” It is difficult
to discover what exactly was the belief professed
Externally, it consisted, primarily, in a marked pre-
ference of a single one of the Egyptian gods over all
the others, and a certain hatred or contempt for the
great bulk of the deities composing the old Pantheon,
[hus far it resembled the religion which Apepi, the
last “ Shepherd King,” had endeavoured to introduce ;
but the new differed from the old reformation in the
matter of the god selected for special honour. Apepi
had sought to turn the Egyptians away from all other
worships except the worship of Set; Amenhotep
desired their universal adhesion to the worship of
224 KHUENATEN AND THE DISK. ‘ORSHIPPERS.
Aten. Aten, in Egyptian theology, had
represented a particular aspect or character of Ra,
“the sun”—that aspect which is expressed by the
phrase, “the solar disk.” How it was possible te
keep Aten distinct from the other sun-gods, Ra,
Khepra, Tum, Shu, Mentu, Osiris, and Horus or
Harmachis, is a puzzle to moderns ; but it scems to
have been a difficulty practically overcome by the
Egyptians, to whom it did not perhaps even present
itself as a difficulty at all. Disk-worship c
then, primarily, in an undue exalt
who was made to take the place of Ammor
the Pantheon, and was ordinarily represented by a
circle with rays proceeding from it, the rays mostly
terminating in hands, which frequently pres
symbols of life and health and strength to the wor-
shipper.
What was the inward essence of the religion ? Was
it simple sun.worship—the adoration of the visible
material sun—considered as the ruling and vivifying
power in the universe, whenee heat and light, and so
life, proceeded? Of all the forms of nature worship
this was the most natural, and in the old world it was
widely spread. Men adored the orb of day as the
grandest object which nature presented to them, as
the great quickener of all things upon the carth, the
cause of germination and growth, of fruitage and har-
vest, the dispenser to man of ten thousand ble:
the sustainer of his life and health and happ
With some the worship was purely and wholly mate-
rial—the sun was viewed as a huge mass of fiery
matter, uninformed by any animate life, unintelligent,
NATURE OF THE DISK-WORSHIP. 225
impersonal; but with others, sun.worship was some-
thing higher than this: the orb of
as informed by a good, wise,bright, beneficent Spirit,
which lived in it, and worked through it, and was the
true benefactor of mankind and sustainer of life and
Baa
of the universe. of this latter kind was
no mean form of natural religion, If not purged
from the debasing clement of materialism, if not
incompatible with a certain kind of polytheism, it is
yet consistent with the firmest belief in the absolute
‘supremacy of one God over all others, with the con-
226 KHUENATEN AND THE DISK-WORSHIPPERS.
ception of that God as all-wise, all-powerful, pure,
holy, kind, loving, and with the entire devotion of the
worshipper to Him exclusively. And this latter form
of sun-worship was, quite conceivably, the religion of
the “Disk worshippers.” “Aten” is probably the
same as “Adon,” the root of Adonis and Adonai, and
has the signification of “Lord”—a term implying
personality, and when used specially of one Being,
implying absolute mastery and lordship, an exclusive
right to worship, homage, and devotion, It is not
unlikely that the“ Disk-worshippers” were drawn on
towards their monotheistic creed by the presence in
Egypt at the time of a large monotheistic population,
the descendants of Joseph and his brethren, who by
this time had multiplied greatly, and must have at-
tracted attention, from their numbers and from the
peculiarity of their tenets. A_ historian of Egypt
remarks that “curious parallels might be drawn
between the external forms of the worship of the
up by the Disk-
worshippers at Tel-el-Amarna ; portions of the sacred
furniture, as the ‘table of shewbread,’ described in
the Book of Exodus as placed within the Tabernacle,
are repeated among the objects belonging to the
worship of Aten, and do not occur among the repre-
sentations of any other epoch.” He further notes
that the commencement of the persecution of the
Israclites in Egypt coincides nearly with the downfall
of the “Disk-worshippers” and the return of the
Egyptians to their old creed, asif the captive race had
been involved in the discredit and the odium which
attached to Amenhotep and his immediate succes-
sors on account of their religious reformation,
DISK-WORSHIP 4 COURT RELIGION. 227
‘The aversion of the “ Disk-worshippers” to the old
Egyptian religion was shown (1) in the change of his
‘own name which the new monarch made soon after
his accession, from Amenhotep to Khu-en-Aten,
whereby he cleared himself from any connection with
the old discarded head of the Pantheon, and associ-
ated himself with the new supreme god, Aten; (2) in
the obliteration of the name of Ammon from monu-
ments; and (3) in the removal of the seat of govern
ment from the site polluted by Ammon-worship and
polytheism to a new site at Tel-el-Amarna, where
Aten alone was worshipped and alone represented in
the temples. The enmity, however, was not indiscri-
minate. Amenhotep took for one of his titles the
epithet, “ Mi-Harmakhu,” or “beloved by Harmachis,”
probably because he could look on Harmachis, a
purely sun-god, as a form of Aten; and to this god
he erected an obelisk at Silsilis. His monumental
war upon the old religion seems also not to have been
general, but narrowly circumscribed, being, in fact,
confined to the erasure of Ammon’s name, especially,
at Thebes, and the mutilation of his form in a few
instances ; but there does not appear to have been
any such general iconoclasm practised by the “ Disk-
worshippers” as by the “Shepherd Kings,” or any
such absolute requirement that “one god alone should
be worshipped in all the land” as was put forth by
Apepi. The “Disk-worshippers” did not so much
attempt to change the religion of Egypt as to estab-
lish for themselves a peculiar court-religion of a pure
and elevated character.
It has been remarked above that the motive power
Y AND THE DISK-WORSHIPPERS.
which brought about the religious revolution is pro-
bably to be found in the powerful influence and the
s of the queen mother, Tii or Taia.
This princess was of foreign origin; her complexion
was fair, her eyes blue, her hair flaxen, her cheeks
rosy ; she probably brought her “ disk-worship” with
her from her own country, whether it were Syria, oF
Arabia, or any other. Already in the lifetime of her
menhotep IIL, she had prevailed on hi
es prevailed on Solomon (1 Kingsxi. 4 8),
to allow her the free exercise of her own religion, and
to provide her with the means of carrying it on with all,
proper pomp and ceremony. At her instance, Amen-
hotep III. constructed a great lake or basin, more
than a mile long and a thousand feet broad, to be
made use of for religious purposes on the queen's,
special festival day. It was proper on that festival day
that “the barge of the most beautiful Disk” should,
perform a voyage on a sheet of water in the presence
of his worshippers—a v ‘age probably representing
the course of the sun through the heavens during the,
year. There is evidence that this festival was kept
on the sixteenth day of the month Athor, in the
eleventh year of Amenhotep IIL, and that the king
xypt while her husband was alive. At

his death she found herself regent for her son, or, at,
any rate, associated with him upon the throne, and
saw that a fresh opportunity for pushing her religious
views offered itself. AmenhotepIV. was of a most
extraordinary plysique and physiognomy. His ap-
PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF KHUENATEN. 229
pearance was rather that of a woman than of a man
he had a slanting forehead, a long aquiline nose, a
flexible projecting mouth, and a strongly developed
chin. His neck, which is represented as most. un-
usually long, seems scarcely equal to the support of
OF AMENHOTEE 18. (KMUEXATES).

his head ; and his spindle shanks seem ill adapted to
sustain the weight of his over-corpulent frame, He
readily yielded himself to his mother’s influence, and
completed her work in the manner which has been
already described. As Thebes opposed itself to his
230 KHUENATEN AND THE DISK-WORSHIPPERS.
reforms, he deserted it, withdrew his court to Tel-el-
Amarna, and there raised the temples, palaces, and
other monuments, in a“ very advanced ” style of art,
which may be seen at the present day.
Amenhotep also introduced certain changes into
the court ceremonial. He surrounded himself with,
officials of foreign race, probably kinsmen of his,
mother, and required from them an open display of,
submission and servility which Egyptian courts had
not witnessed previously. An abject prostration
was enforced on all, while the king posed before
courtiers as a benevolent god, who showered down
his gifts upon them from a superior sphere, since his,
greatness did not permit a closer contact. He was,
himself the “ Light of the Solar Disk,” an apaugasmna,
or “Light proceeding from Light ;” it behoved him,
to imitate the Sun-god, and perpetually bestow his
gifts on men, but it behoved them to veil their faces,
from his radiance and receive his bounty prostrate in
the dust beneath
‘The peculiar views of Khuen-Aten, or Amenhotep
IV, were maintained by the two or three succeeding
Kings, who had short and disturbed reigns. After
them there arose a king called Horus, or Har-em-
hebi, who utterly swept away the “ Disk-worshippers,
ruined their new city, obliterated their names, muti-
lated their monuments, and restored the ancient
religion of the Egyptians to its former place as the
religion, not only of the people, but of the court.
Henceforth, what was called “ heresy” ceased to show
itself in the land,
Xv.
BEGINNING OF THE DECLINE OF EGYPT,
Tue internal troubles connected with the * Disk
worship” had for about forty years distracted the
attention of the Egyptians from the posses:
sions; and this circumstance had favoured the de-
velopment of a highly important power in Westen
Asia, The Hittites, whose motto was “reculer pour
micux sauter,” having withdrawn themselves from
Syria during the time of the Egyptian attacks, retain-
ing, perhaps, their hold on Carchemish (Jerabus), but
not seeking to extend themselves further southward,
took heart of grace when the Egyptian expeditions
ceased, and descending from their mountain fast
nesses to the Syrian plains and vales, rapidly estab.
lished their dominion over the regions recently
conquered by Thothmes I. and Thothmes IIL. With-
out absorbing the old native races, they reduced them
under their sway, and reigned as lords paramount
over the entire region between the Middle Euphrates
and the Mediterranean, the Taurus range and the
borders of Egypt. The chief of the subject races
were the Kharu, in the tract bordering upon Egypt;
the Rutennu, in Central and Northern Palestine ; and
in Southern Ceelesyria, the Amairu or Amorites. The
232 BEGINNING OF THE DECLINE OF pOYPT.
Hittites themselves occupied the lower Corlesyrian
valley,and the tract reaching thence to the Euphrates,
They were at this period so far centralized into a
nation as to have placed themselves under a single
monarch; and about the time when Egypt had re-
covered from the troubles caused by the “ Disk-wor-
shippers,” and was again at liberty to look abroad,
Saplal, Grand-Duke of Khita, a great and puissant
sovereign, sat upon the Hittite throne,
ing attitude on the
ypt, drew upon him the
jealousy of Ramesses I, father of the great Seti, and
(according to the prevalent tradition) founder of the
“nineteenth dynasty. 1d oneself it is often
best to attack, and Ramesses, taking this view, in his
first or second year plunged into the enemy’s do-
minions. He had the pica that Palestine and Syria,
and even Western Mesopotamia, belonged of right to
Egypt, which had conquered them by a long series
jctories, and had never lost them by any det
aster. His invasion was a challenge to
either to fight for his ill-gotten gains, or to give them,
up. The Hittite king accepted the challenge, and
a short struggle followed with an indecisive result.
wee was made, and a formal treaty of
alliance drawn out. Its terms are unknown; but
it was probably engraved on a silver plate in the
languages of the two powers—the Egyptian hiero-
glyphics, and the now well-known Hittite picture-
writing—and set up in duplicate at Carchemish and
Thebes.
A brief pause followed the conclusion of the first
War OP SETI 1. WITH THE HITTITES. 233
act of the drama, On the opening of the second act.
we find the dramatis persone changed. Saplal and
Ramesses have alike descended into the grave, and
their thrones are occupied respectively by the son of
the one and the grandson of the other. In Egypt,
Scti-Menephthah I, the Sethos of Manetho, has,
succeeded his father, Ramesses I.; in the Hittite king.
dom, Saplal has left his sceptre to his grandson
Mautenar, the son of Marasar, who had probably
before his father. Two young and in
princes confront one the other in the two neighbour
ands, each distrustful of his rival, each covetous of
glory, each hopeful of success if war should break
out. True, by treaty the two kings were friends and,
allies—by treaty the two nations were bound to,
abstain from all aggression by the one upon the other:
but such bonds are like the “green withes” that
bound Samson, when the desire to burst them seizes,
those upon whom they have been placed. Seti and
Mautenar were at war before the latter had been on
the throne a year, and their swords were at one
another's throats. Seti was, apparently, the aggressor.
We find him at the head ofa large army in the heart
of Syria before we could have supposed that he had had
time to settle himself comfortably in his father’s seat.
Mautenar was taken unawares. He had not
pected so prompt an attack. He had perhaps been
weak enough to count on his adversary’s good faith,
of, at any rate on his regard for appearances. But
Seti, as a god upon earth, could of course do no
wrong, and did not allow himself to be trammelled
by the moral laws that were binding upon ordinary
234 BEGINNING OF THE DECLINE OF EGYPT.
mortals. He boldly rushed into war at the first
possible moment, crossed the frontier, and having
chastised the Shasu, who had recently made an inva-
sion of his territory, fell upon the Kharu, or Southern
Syrians, and gave thema severe defeat near Jamnia
in the Philistine country. He then pressed forward
into the country of the Rutennu, overcame them in
several pitched battles, and, assisted by a son who,
fought constantly at his side, slaughtered them almost
to extermination, His victorious progress brought,
him, after a time, to the vicinity of Kadesh, the im-
portant city on the Orontes which, a century earlier,
had been besieged and taken by the Great Thothmes.
Kadesh was at this time in possession of the Amorites,
who were tributary to the Khita (Hittites) and held
the great city as their subject allies. Seti, having,
carefully concealed his advance, came upon the,
stronghold suddenly, and took its defenders by sur-
prise. Outside the city peaceful herdsmen were
pasturing their cattle under the shade of the trees,
when they were startled by the appearance of the
Egyptian monarch, mounted on his war-chariot drawn
by two prancing steeds. At once all was confusion:,
every one sought to save himself; the herds with their
keepers fled in wild panic, while the Egyptians plied
them with their arrows, But the garrison of the town,
resisted bravely: a portion sallied from the gates and
met Seti in the open field, but were defeated with great
slaughter ; the others defended themselves behind
the walls. But all was in vain. The disciplined troops
of Egypt stormed the key of Northern Syria, and the
whole Orontes valley lay open to the conqueror.
TREATY OF PE. ce. 235
Hitherto the Hittites had not been engaged in the
struggle. Attacked at a disadvantage, unprepared,
they had left their subject allies to make such resist=
ance as they might find possible, and had reserved,
themselves for the defence of their own country.
Mautenar had, no doubt, made the best preparations
of which circumstances admitted—he had organized
his forces in three bodies, “ on foot, on horseback, and,
in chariots” At the head of them, he gave battle to
the invaders so soon as they attacked him in his own,
proper country, and a desperate fight followed, in
which the Egyptians, however, prevailed at last. The
ites received a“ great overthrow.” The song of
triumph composed for Seti on the occasion declared:
“Pharaoh is a jackal which rushes leaping through
the Hittite land; he is a grim lion exploring the
hidden ways of all regions; he is a powerful bull with
a pair of sharpened horns. He has struck down the
Asiatics; he has thrown to the ground the Khita;
he has slain their princes ; he has overwhelmed them
in their own blood; he has passed among them as a
flame of fire ; he has brought them to nought.”
The victory thus gained was followed by a treaty
of peace. Mautenar and Seti agreed to be henceforth,
friends and allies, Southern Syria being restored to
Egypt, and Northern Syria remaining under the do-
minion of the Hittites, probably as far as the sources,
of the Orontes river. A line of communication must,
however, have been left open between Egypt and
Mesopotamia, for Seti still exercised authority over
the Nairi, and received tribute from their chiefs. He
was also, by the terms of the treaty, at liberty to
236 BEGINNING OF THE DECLINE oF Eeyr,
make war on the nations of the Upper coast,
for we find him reducing the Tahai, who bordered on
Cilicia, without any disturbance of his relations with
Mautenar. The second act in the war between the
Egyptians and the Hittites thus terminated with an
advantage to the Egyptians, who recovered most
of their Asiatic possessions, and had, besides, the
prestige of a great victory.
he third act was deferred for a space of some
thirty-five years, and fell into the reign of Ramesses
IL, Seti’s Son and successor. Before giving an ac-
count of it, we must briefly touch the other wars of
Seti, to show how great a warrior he was,and mention
one further fact in his warlike policy indicative of
the commencement of Egypt's decline as a military,
power. Seti, then, had no sooner concluded his peace
with the great power of the North, than he turned his,
arms against the West and South, invading, first of
all, “the blue-eyed, fair-skinned nation of the Ta-
hennu,” who inhabited the North African coast from,
the borders of Egypt to about Cyrene, and engaging,
in a sharp contest with them. ‘The Tahennu were
a wild, uncivilized people, dwelling in caves, and,
having no other arms besides bows and arrows. For
dress they wore a long cloak or tunic, open in front;
and they are distinguished on the Egyptian monu-
ments by wearing two ostrich feathers and having all
shaved excepting one large lock, which is
J hangs down on the right side of the head.
This unfortunate people could make only a poor re-
sistance to the Egyptian trained infantry and powerful
chariot force. They were completely defeated in a
SETT'S LONG WaL
pitched battle; numbers of the chiefs were made
prisoners, while the people generally fled to their
caves, where they remained hidde i
through fear of the king's m
struck terror into their hearts, passed on towards the
south, and fiercely chastised the Cushites on the
Upper Nile, who during the war with the Hittites
had given trouble, and showed themselves inclined to
shake off the Egyptian yoke. Here again he was
successful ; the negroes and Cushites submitted after
a short struggle ; and the Great King returned to
his capital victorious on all sides—“on the south to
the arms of the Winds, and on the north to the Great
Sea’
Seti was not dazzled with his military successes.
Notwithstanding his triumphs in Syria, he recognized
the fact that Egypt had much to fear from her
Asiatic neighbours, and could not hope to maintain
for long her aggressive attitude in that quarter. With-
‘out withdrawing from any of the conquered countries,
le still claiming their obedience and enforcing the
payment of their tributes, he began to made preparation
for the changed circumstances which he anticipated by
commencing the construction of a long wall on his
north-eastern frontier, as a security against invasion
from Asia. This wall began at Pelusium, and was
carried across the isthmus in a south-westerly dirce-
tion by Migdol to Pithom, or Heroopolis, where the
Jong line of lagoons began, which were connected
with the upper end of the Red Sea. It recalls to the
mind of the historical student the many ramparts
raised by nations, in their decline, against aggressive
foes—as the Great Wall of China, built to keep off the
Tartars; the Roman wall between the Rhine and
Danube, intended to restrain the advance of the
German tribes ; and the three Roman ramparts in
Great Britain, built to protect the Roman province
from its savage northern neighbours, Walls of this
kind are always signs of weakness ; and when Seti
began, and Ramesses II. completed, the rampart of,
Egypt, it was a confession that the palmy days of the
empire were past, and that henceforth she must look,
forward to having to stand, in the main, on the
defensive.
Before acquiescing wholly in this conclusion,
Ramesses II, who, after reigning conjointly with his,
father for several years, was now sole king, resolved
on a desperate and prolonged effort to re-assert for
Egypt that dominant position in Western Asia which,
she had held and obtained under the third Thothmes.
Mautenar, the adversary of Seti, appears to have
died, and his place to have been taken by his brother,
Khita-sir, a brave and enterprizing monarch. Khita-
sir, despite the terms of alliance on which the Hittites
stood with Egypt, had commenced a series of intrigues,
with the nations bordering on Upper Syria, and,
formed a confederacy which had for its object to resist,
the further progress of the Egyptians, and, if possible,
to drive them from Asia, This confederacy embraced
the Nairi, or people of Western Mesopotamia, reckoned
by the Egyptians among their subjects ; the Airatu
or people of Aradus; the Masu or inhabitants of the
Mous Masius ; the Leka, perhaps Lycians ; the inhabi-
tants of Carchemish, of Kadesh on the Orontes, of
HITTITE AR OF RAMESSES 1. 239
Aleppo, Anaukasa, Akarita, &c.—all warlike races,
and accustomed to the use of chariots, _Khitasir’s
proceedings, having become known to Ramesses,
afforded ample grounds fora rupture,and quite justified
him in pouring his troops into S nd doing his best
to meet and overcome the danger which threatened
him, Unaware at what point his enemy would elect
to meet him, he marched forward cautiously, having,
arranged his troops in four divisions, which might
mutually support each other. Entering the Crlesyrian
valley from the south, he had proceeded as far as the
lake of Hems, and neighbourhood of Kadesh, before
he received any tidings of the position taken up by.
the confederate army. ‘There his troops captured,
two of the enemy's scouts, and on questioning them,
were told that the Hittite army had been at Kadesh,
but had retired on learning the Egyptian’s advance
and taken up a position near Aleppo, distant nearly
a hundred miles to the north-east. Had Ramesses
believed the scouts, and marched forward carelessly,
he would have fallen into a trap, and probably suffered,
defeat ; for the whole confederate army was massed,
just beyond the lake, and there lay concealed by the
embankment which blocks the lake at its lower end.
But the Egyptian king was too wary forhis adversary.
He ordered the scouts to be examined by scourging,
to see if they would persist in their tale, whereupon
they broke down and revealed the true position of the
army. ‘The battle had thus the character of a regular
pitched engagement, without surprise or other acci-
dent on cither side. Khitasir, finding himself foiled,
quitted his ambush, and marched openly against the
fans, with his troops marshalled in exact and
orderly array, the Hittite chariots in front with their
lines carefully dressed, and the auxiliaries and ire
regulars on the flanks and rear. Of the fourdivisions
yyptian army, one seems to have been absent,
acting as a rear-guard; Ramesses, with one,
marched down the left bank of the stream, while the
two. remaining divisions proceeded along the right
bank, a slight’ interval separating them. Khitasir
commenced the fight by a flank movement to the
left, which brought him into collision with the extreme
Egyptian right, “the brigade of Ra,” as it was called,
and enabled him to engage that division separately.
His assault was irresistible. “Foot and horse of King
Ramesses,” we are told, “ gave way before him,” the
“brigade of Ra” was utterly routed, and either cut to
pieces or driven from the field. Ramesses, informed
of this disaster, endeavoured to cross the river to
the assistance of his beaten troops; but, before he
could effect his purpose, the enemy had anticipated
him, had charged through the Orontes in two lines,
and was upon him, The adverse hosts met. The
chariot of Ramesses, skilfully guided by his squire,
Menna, seems to have broken through the front line
of the Hittite chariot force; but his brethren in arms
were less fortunate, and Ramesses found himself
separated from his army, behind the front line and
confronted by the second line of the hostile chariots,
ina position of the greatest possible danger. Then
began that Homeric combat, which the Egyptians
were never tired of celebrating, between a single
warrior on the one hand, and the host of the
BATTLE OF KADESH. 241
Hittites, reckoned at two thousand five hundred
chariots, on the other, in which Ramesses, like Diomed.
or Achilles, carried death and destruction whither-
soever he turned himself. “I became like the god
Mentu,” he is made to say; “T hurled the dart with
my right hand, I fought with my left hand; I was,
like Baalin his fury against them. I had come upon,
two thousand five hundred pairs of horse
the midst of them but they were dashed in pieces
before my steeds. Not one of them raised his hand
to fight; their heart shrank within them; their limbs
gave way, they could not hurl the dart, nor had they
strength to thrust with the spear. As crocodiles fall
into the water, so I made them fall; they tumbled
headlong one over another. I killed them at my
pleasure, so that not one of them looked back behind
him, nor did any turn round, Each fell, and none
raised himself up again.”
‘The temporary isolation of the monarch, which is
the main point of the heroic poem of Pentaour, and,
which Ramesses himself recorded over and over again
upon the walls of his magnificent constructions, must
no doubt be regarded as a fact; but it is not likely to
have continued for more than a few minutes. The
minutes may have seemed as hours to the king; and
there may have been time for him to perform several
exploits. But we may be sure that, when his com-
anions found that he was lost to their sight, they at
once made frantic efforts to recover him, dead or
alive ; they forced openings in the first Hittite chariot,
ine, and sped to the rescue of their sovercign. He
had, perhaps, already emptied many chariots of the
242° BEGINNIN or THE DECLINE OF EGYPT.
second line, which was paralysed by his audacity;
and his companions found it easy to complete the
work which he had begun. ‘The broken second line
turned and fled; the confusion became general ; a
headlong flight carried the entire host to the banks
of the Orontes, into which some precipitated them-
selves, while others were forced into the water by their
pursuers, The king of Khirabu (Aleppo) was among
these, and was with great difficulty drawn out by
his friends, exhausted and half dead, when he reached
the eastern shore. But the great bulk of the Hittite
army perished, either in the battle or in the river.
Among the killed and wounded were Grabatasa, the
charioteer of Khitasir; Tarakennas, the commander
of the cavalry; Rabsuna, another general; Khirapusar,
a royal secretary; and Matsurama, a brother of the
Hittite king,
On the next day the battle was renewed ; but, after
a short time, Khitasir retired, and sent a humble em-
bassy to the camp of his adversary to implore for
peace. Ramesses held a council of war with his
generals, and by their advice agreed to accept the
submission made to him, and, without entering into
any formal engagement, to withdraw his army and
return to Egypt. It seems probable that his victory
had cost him dear, and that he was not in a condition
to venture further from his resources,or to affront new
dangers in a difficult, and to him unknown, region,
Experience tells us that it is one thing to gaina
battle, quite another to be successful in the result of a
long war. Whatever glory Ramesses obtained by the
battle of Kadesh, and the other victories which he
PEACE MADE WITH THE HITTITES. 243
claims to have won in the Syrian campaigns of
several succeeding years, it is certain that he com-
pletely failed to break the power of the Hittites, and
that he was led in course of time to confess his failure,
and to adopt a policy of conciliation towards the
people which he found himself unable to subdue.
Sixteen years after the battle of Kadesh he concluded,
a solemn treaty with Khitasir, which was engraved on
silver and placed under the most sacred sanctions,
whereby an exact equality was established between
the high contracting powers. Each nation bound
itself under no circumstances to attack the other;
each promised to give aid to the other, if requested,
in case of its ally being attacked ; each pledged itself
to the extradition both of criminals flying from justice
and of any other subjects wishing to change their
allegiance; each stipulated for an amnesty of offences,
in the case of all persons thus surrendered. ‘Thirteen,
years after the conclusion of the treaty the close
alliance between the two powers was further cemented
by a marriage, which, by giving the two dynasties
common interests, greatly strengthened the previously
existing bond. Ramesses requested and received in,
marriage a daughter of Khitasir in the thirty-fourth
year of his sole reign, when he had borne the royal
title for forty-six years, He thus became the son-in-
law of his former adversary, whose daughter was,
thenceforth recognized as his sole legitimate queen.
‘Aconsiderable change in the relations of Egypt to
her still remaining Asiatic dependencies accompanied,
this alteration in the footing upon which she stood,
with the Hittites. “The bonds of their subjection,
became much less strict than y had been under
Thothmes III. ; prudential motives constrained the
‘gyptians to be content with very much less—with
such acknowledgments, in fact, as satisfied their
vanity, rather than with the exercise of any real
power.” From and after the conclusion of peace and
alliance between Ramesses and Khitasir,
influence in Asia grew vague, shadowy, and
tinuous. At long intervals monarchs of more enter-
prize than the ordinary run asserted it, and a brief
success generally crowned their efforts; but, speaking
broadly, we may say that her Asiatic dominion was
lost, and that Egypt became once more an African,
power, confined within nearly her ancient limit
If, from a military point of view, the decline of
Egypt is to be dated from the reigns, partly joint
reigns, of Seti I. and Ramesses IIL, from the stand-
point of art the period must be pronounced the very,
apogee of Egyptian greatness, The architectural
works of these two monarchs transcend most de-
<dly all those of all other Pharaohs, either earlier
or later. No single work, indeed, of either king equals
er the First or the Second Pyramid; but
number, in variety, in beauty, in all that constitutes
artistic excellence, the constructions of Seti and Ra-
messes are unequalled, not only among
monuments, but among those of all other
Greece is, of course, unapproachable in the matter of
sculpture, whether in the way of statuary, or of high,
of low relief; but, apart from this, Egypt in her archi
tectural works will challenge comparison with any,
country that ever existed, or any people that ever gave
GREAT PILLARED HALL OF SETI. 248
itselfto the embodiment of artistic conceptions in stone
or marble. And Egyptian architecture culminated
under Seti and his son Ramesses. The greatest of all
Seti’s works was his pillared hall at Karnak, the most
splendid single chamber that has ever been built by
any architect, and, even in its rn of the
grandest sights that the world contains. Seti’s hall
three hundred and thirty fect long, by one hundred,
and seventy feet broad, having thus an internal area
of fifty-six thousand square fe t, and covers, together
with its wallsand pylons, an area of eighty-cight thou-
sand such feet, ora larger space than that covered by
the Dom of Cologne, the largest of all the cathedrals
north of the Alps. It was supported by one hundred
and sixty-four massive stone columns, which were
divided into three groups—twelve central ones, ¢
sixty-six feet y-three feet in circumfer-
ence, formed the main avenue down its midst ; while
on either side, two groups of sixty-one columns, each
forty-two feet high and twenty-seven round, supported
the huge wings of the chamber, arranged in seven
rows of seven each, and two rows of six. The whole
was roofed over with solid blocks of stone, the light-
ing being, as in the far smaller hall of Thothmes III,
by means of a clerestory. The roof and pillars and
walls were everywhere covered with painted bas-
reliefs and hieroglyphics, giving great richness of
effect, and constituting the whole building the most
magnificent on which the eye of man has ever rested.
Fergusson, the best modern authority on architecture,
says of it: “No language can convey an idea of its
beauty, and no artist has yet been able to reproduce
its form so as to convey to those who have not seen
it an idea of ‘The mass of its central
piers, illumined by a flood of light from the clere-
story, and the smaller pillars of the wings gradually
fading into obscurity yged_and lighted as
to convey an idea of infinite space ; at the same time
the beauty and massiveness of the forms, and the
brillianey of their coloured decorations, all com!
to stamp this as the greatest of man's arclatectural
Dut such a one as it would be impossible to
reproduce, except in sucha climate, and in that indi-
vidual style, in which and for which it was created.”*
As Seti constructed the most wonderful of all the
palatial buildings which Egypt produced,so he also
constructed what is, on the whole, the most wonderful
of the tombs, ‘The pyramids impose upon us by their
enormity, and astonish by the engineering skill shown
in their execution; but they smbody a single simple
idea ; they have no complication of parts, no clabora-
tion of ornament; they are taker. in at a glance;
they do not gradually untold themselves, or furnish a
succession of surprises. But it is otherwise with the
rock-tombs, whereof Seti’s is the most magnificent.
‘The rock-tombs are “ gorgeous palaces, hewn out of
the rock, and painted with all the decorations that
could have been seen in palaces” They contain a
succession of passages, chambers, corridors, staircases,
and pillared halls, each further removed from the
‘entrance than the last, and all covered with an infinite
variety of the most finished and brilliant paintings.
The tomb of Seti contains three pillared halls, respec-
vt 19, 1202
serrs NCAVATED TOMB. 247
tively twenty-seven fect by twenty-five, twenty-eight
feet by twenty-seven, and forty-three fe t by seventeen,
and a half; a large saloon with an arched roof, thirty
feet by twenty-sev smaller chambers of dif-
ferent sizes ; three staircases, and two long corridors.
‘The whole series of apartments, from end to end of
the tomb, is continuously ornamented with painted
bas-r lea is that of conductingthe king to
the world of death. The further you advance into the
tomb, the deepcr you become involved in endless pro-
cessions of jackal-headed gods, and - monstrous forms
of genii, good and evil ; and the goddess of Justice,
with her single ostrich feather; and barges carrying
mummies, raised aloft over the sacred lake; and,
mummies themselves; and, more than all, everlast:
ing convolutions of serpents in every possible form
and attitude—human-legged, human-headed, crowned,
entwining mummies, enwreathing or embraced by
processions, extending down whole galleries, so that
‘meeting the head of a serpent at the top of a stair-
case, you have to descend to its very end before you
reach his tail. At last you arrive at the close of all—
the vaulted hall, in the centre of which lies the
immense alabaster sarcophagus, which ought to,
contain the body of the king. Here the processions,
above, below, and around, reach their highest pitch—
meandering round and round—white, and black, and
red, and blue—legs and arms and wings spread
enormous forms over the ceilings; and below lies the
sarcophagus itself.”
* Adapted ffom Dean Stanley's“ Sinai and Pal Introduction,
pal
248 BEGINNIN OF THE DECLINE OF EGYPT.
The greatest of the works of Ramesses are of a
ferent description, and are indicative of that inordinate
vanity which is the leading feature of his character.
They are colossal images of himself, Four of these,
y fect in height, form the facade of the
marvellous rock-temple of Ipsambul—"the finest of
its class known to exist anywhere ”—and constitute
one of the most impressive sights which the world,
has to offer. There stands the Great King, four times
repeated, silent, majestic, superhuman—with features
marked by profound repose and tranquillity, touched
perhaps with a little scorn, looking out eternally on
the grey-white Nubian waste, which stretches far
away toa dim and distant horizon. Here, as you sit,
‘on the deep pure sand, you seem to see the monarch,
who did so much, who reigned so long, who covered,
not only Egypt, but » jopia with his
memorials, “You can look at his features inch by,
inch, sec them not only magnified to tenfold their
original size, so that ear and mouth and nose, and
every link of his collar, and every line of his skin,
sinks into you with the weight of a mountain ; but,
those features are repeated exactly the same three
‘times over—four times they once were, but the upper
part of the fourth statue is gone. Look at them as
they emerge—the two northern figures—from the sand
which reaches up to their throats; the southernmost,
as he sits unbroken, and revealed from the top of his
royal helmet to the toe of his enormous foot.” Look
at them, and remember that you have here portrait
statues of one of the greatest of the kings of the Old
ey, “Sinai and Pasting,” p. ali
RAMESSES I, ISRAEL'S OPPRESSOR. 249
World, of the world that was “old” when Greece
and Rome were either unborn or in their swaddling,
clothes; portrait-statues, moreover, of the king who,
if either tradition or chronology can be depended ot
was the actual great oppressor of Israel—the king
who sought the life of Moses—the king from whom,
Moses fled, and until whose death he did not dare to
return out of the land of Midian.
According to the almost unanimous voice of those
most conversant with Egyptian antiquities, the
“great oppressor” of the Hebrews was this Ramesses.
Seti may have been the originator of the scheme for
crushing them by hard usage, but, as the oppression,
lasted close upon eighty years (Ex. ii, 1; vii 7), it
must have covered at least two: so that, ifit began
under Seti, it must have continued under his son and,
successor. The bricks found at Tel-el-Maskoutah
show Ramesses as the main builder of Pithom (Pa
Tum), and the very name indicates that he was the
main builder of Raamses (Pa-Ramessu). We must
thus ascribe to him, at any rate, the great bulk of that
severe and cruel affliction, which provoked Moses
cs which made Israel “sigh” and “groan”
(ib. 23, 24), and on which God looked down with
compassion (ib. i , 7). It was he especially who,
“made their lives bitter in mortar, and in bri
in all manner of service in the field”
was “with rigour.” Ramesses was a bu
most extensive scale, Without producing any single
edifice so perfect as the “Pillared Hall of Seti,” he
was indefatigable in his constructive efforts, and no,
Egyptian king came up to him in this respect. The
monuments show that he erected his buildings chiefly
by forced labour, and that those employed on them
were chiefly foreigners. Some have thought that the
Hebrews are distinctly mentioned as employed by
him on his constructions under the term “Aperu,” or
“Aperiu”; but this view is not generally accepted.

Still, “the name is so often used for foreign bondsmen
engaged in the very work of the Hebrews, and
especially during the oppression, that it is hard not
to believe it to be a general term in which they are
included, though it does not actually describe them.”*
* Stuart Poole, *Cites of Egypt.” p. 105.
BUST OF Ra. SSES 251
‘The physiognomieofs Seti I. and Ramesses IT, as
represented on the sculptures," offer a curious con
* The mummy of SetiI. has been recently uncovered Tt

‘good condition, and is said to have revealed a face very dlos
Sembling that of RamesesII, with fine delicate features, and alto
gether of an elevated type. ‘The nose, mouth, chin, in short all the
features,” says M. Maspero, “are the same ; but in the father they are
‘more refined, more intelligent, more spiritual ‘when reproduced
inthe son. Seti. is, ast wet, the iealized type of RamessesTI
(Letter of M. Maspero in The Timer of Joly 23, 1886.) Tt may per:
haps be doubted whether the shrunken ‘mummy, 3300 years old, is
Detter evidence ofthe living real ty than the contemporary sculptures
trast. Seti’s face is thoroughly African, strong, fierce,
prognathous, with depressed nose, thick lips, and a
heavy chin, The face of Ramesses is Asiatic. He
has a good forehead, a large, well-formed, slightly,
aquiline nose, a well-shaped mouth, with lips that
are not too full, a small d and an eye
that is thoughtful and pensive, We may conclude
that Seti was of the true Egyptian race, with per-
haps an admixture of more southern blood; while
Ramesses, born ofa Semitic mother, inherited through
her Asiatic characteristics, and, though possessing
less energy and strength of character than his father,
had a more sensitive temperament, a wider range of
taste, and a greater inclination towards peace and
tranquillity. His important wars were all concluded
thin the limit of his twenty-first year, while his
entire reign was one of sixty-seven years, during
fifty of which he held the sole sovereignty. Though,
he left the fame of a great warrior behind him, his,
chief and truest triumphs seem to have been those
of peace—the Great Wall for the protection of Egypt
towards the east, with its strong fortresses and
cities,” the canal which united the Nile with the Red,
Sea, and the countless buildings, excavations, obelisks,
colossal statues, and other great works, with which he
adorned Egypt from one end to the other.
CHAPTER XVI.
MENEPHTHAH L, THE PHARAOH OF THE EXODUS.
MENErHTHAn, the thirteenth son and immediate
successor of Ramesses II, came to the throne under
circumstances which might at first sight have seemed
favourable. Egypt was on every side at peace with
her neighbours. ‘The wall of Ramesses, and his treaty
with the Hittites, cemented as it had been by a
marriage, secured the eastern frontier. No formidable
attack had ever yet fallen upon Egypt from the west
or from the south, and so no danger could well be
apprehended from those quarters. Internal tranquillity
might not be altogether assured, so long as there was,
within the limits of Egypt a I rge subject population,
suffering oppression and bitterly discontented with
its lot. But this population was quite unwarlike,
and had hitherto passively submitted itself to the will
of its rulers, without giving any indication that it
might become actively hostile. Menephthah, who
was perhaps not more than five and twenty, may have
been justified in looking forward to a long, quiet, and
tful reign, during which he might indulge the
natural apathy of his temper, or dream away life, like
his fabled neighbours, the Lotus-Eaters.
‘Menephthah’s features were soft and womanly. He
254 MENEPHTHAH t.
had a fall but sleepy eye, a slightly aquiline nose, an,
extremely short upper-lip, a broad check, and a
rounded chin, In character he was weak, irresolute,
wanting in physical courage, yet, as so often happens,
with weak characters, harsh, oppressive, and treacher-
ous. The monuments depict him as neither a soldier
nor an administrator, but as “one whose mind was,
turned almost exclusively towards the chimeras of
soreery and magic,” which he regarded as of the
utmost importance. Still, had the times been quiet,
had the prospect of tranquillity which seemed to lie
before him on his accession been realized, he might
perhaps have so conducted affairs as to bring neither
discredit nor injury upon his country. But the
circumstances of the pericd were against him. ‘The
unclouded prospect of his early years gave place, after
a brief interval, to storm and tempest of the most
fearful kind ; a terrible invasion carried fire and sword,
into the heart of his dominions; and he had scarcely,
escaped this danger by meeting it ina way not very
honourable to himself, when internal troubles broke
out: a subject race, highly valued for services which it
was compelled to render, insisted on quitting the
land; a great loss was incurred in an attempt to,
compel it to remain ; then open rebellion broke out,
in the weakened state; and the reign, which had,
commenced under such fair auspices, terminated
calamity and confusion. Menephthah was quite
incompetent to deal with the difficulties and com-
plications wherewith he found himself surrounded;
he hesitated, temporized, made concessions, retracted
them, and finally conducted Egypt to a catastrophe
from which she did not recover for a generation,
LIBYAN INVASION OF EGYPT. 255
The first great trouble which disturbed the tran-
quillity of his reign was an invasion of his territories
from the north-west. Hitherto, though no_ serious
danger had ever threatened from this quarter, there
had been frequent raids into Egypt on the part of the
native Africans. and most of the more warlike of the
Egyptian monarchs had regarded it as incumbent on

them to lead from time to time expeditions into the
region, for the purpose of weakening the
Tahennu, Maxyes, and others, and_ ins
with a whoiesome dread of the Egyptian power.
Ramesses II. had on one oc
256 MENEPHTHAH 1.
‘quarter, as already related, and had met witha certain,
amount of success. But since that time many years had
passed. A new generation had grown up, which the
Egyptians had allowed to remain unmolested, and
which felt no fear of its quiet, peaceful,
and industrious
neighbours. Population had probably multiplied in
the region, and the tribes began to feel stinted for
room, Above all, new relations had been contracted,
between the old inhabitants of the tract and some
other races, now for the first time heard of in authentic
history, who had been brought into contact with them,
‘A league of nations had become possible; and the
force of the united league must have been coi
able. Might not an actual conquest be effected, and
the half-starved nomads of Marmarica and the Cyre-
naica become the lords and masters of the rich plain,
so long coveted, which adjoined upon their eastern
frontier?
The leading spirit of the combination was a native
African prince, Marmaiu, the son of Deid. Having
determined on a serious invasion of Egypt, for the
purpose of conquest, not of plunder, he first of all
collected his native forces, Lubu, Tahennu, Mashuash,
Kahaka, to the number of twenty-five or thirty
thousand, and then purchased the services of a
number of auxiliaries, who raised his force probably
to a total of thirty-five or forty thousand men. A
peculiar interest attaches to these auxiliaries. They
consisted of contingents from five nations, whose
names are read as Akausha, Luku, Tursha, Shartana
or Shardana, and Sheklusha. and whom most modern
historians of Egypt identify with the Achwans,
THE LIBYAN ALLIES. 237
yrsenians, Sardinians, and Sicilians, If
these identifications are accepted—and they are at
Teast plausible—we shall have to suppose that,as early
as the fourteenth century iC, the nations of Southern
urope were so far advanced as to launch fleets upon
the Mediterranean, to enter into a regular league with
an African prince, and in conjunction with him to
make an attack on one of the chief civilized monarchies,
of the world, the old kingdom of the Pharaohs. We
shall have to imagine the Achawans of the Peloponnese,
a century before the time of Agamemnon, braving the
perils of the Levant in their cockle-shellsof ships, and
not merely plundering the coasts, but landing large
bodies of men on the North African shore to take
part in a regular campaign, We shall have to picture
to ourselves the Laconians—the people of Menelatis—
about the time of his grandfather, Atreus, or his
great-grandfather, Pelops, similarly employed, and
contending with the Pharaoh of the Exodus on the
soil of the Delta. Nay, we shall have to antedate
the rise of the Tyrsenians to naval greatness by about
seven hundred years, and to suppose that the Sicels
and Sardi, whom the Greeks and Romans found
living the life of savages in Sicily and Sardinia, when
sd their shores, about 1.C. 750-600,
1g peoples and skilful navigators half a
millennium earlier. ‘The picture which we thus obtain,
of the ancient world is very surprising, and quite
unlike anything that could be gathered from the
literature of the Greeks; but it is not to be regarded,
as beyond the range of possibility, since nations are
quite as apt to lapse from civilization into barbarism
258 MENEPHTHAH 1.
as to emerge out of barbarism into civilization. Tt is
quite conceivable that the nations of South-Eastern,
Europe were more advanced in civilization and the
arts of life about 1k¢. 1400-1300 than they are found,
to have been six centuries later, the false dawn having
been succeeded by a time of darkness before the true
‘dawn came.
However this may have been, it is certain that
Menephthah, in the fifth year of his reign, had to
meet a formidable, and apparently unprovoked, attack
from a combination of nations, the like of which we
do not again meet with in Egyptian history, either
carlier or later. Marmaiu, son of Deid, led against
him a confederate army, consisting of three princi-
pal tribes of the the Lubu (Libyans), the
Mashuash (Maxyes), and the Kahaka—together with
auxiliaries from five other tribes or peoples, the
Akausha, the Luku, the Tursha, the Shartana, and
the Sheklusha. The entire number of the army, as
already stated, was probably not less than forty
thousand; they had numerous chariots, and were
armed with bows and arrows, cuirasses, and bronze
or copper swords. They had skin tents, and brought
with them their wives and children, with the intention,
of settling in Egypt, as the Hyksds had done five
hundred years earlier. They had also with them a
considerable number of cattle, as bulls, oxen, and,
goats. The chiefs came provided with thrones, and
both they and their officers had numerous drinking
vessels of bronze, of silver, and of gold.
The attack was made on the western side of Egypt,
towards the apex of the Delta. It was at first com-
PREPARATIONS FOR RESISTANCE. 259
pletely successful. The small frontier towns were
taken by assault, and “ turned into heaps of rubbish ;”
the Delta was entered upon, and a position taken up
in the nome of Paari-sheps, or Prosopis, which lay
between the Canobie and Sebennytic branches of the
Nile, commencing at the point of their separati
From this position Memphis and Heliopolis were
© menaced. Menephthah hastily fortified these
cities, or rather, we must suppose, strengthened their
existing defences. Meanwhile the Libyans and their
allies ravaged the open country. “The like had not
been séen,” as the native scribe observes, “even in
the times of the kings of Lower Egypt, when the
plague (i. the Hyks6s power) was in the land, and.
the kings of Upper Egypt were unable to drive it
out.” Egypt was desolated ; its people “trembled
like geese ;” the fer le lands were overrun and wasted;
the cities were pillaged ; even the harbours were
some cases ruined and destroyed. Menephthah for a
time remained on the defensive, shut up within the
walls of Memphis, whose god Phthah he viewed as
his special protector. He made, however, strenuous
efforts to gather together a powerful force; his
captains collected the native troops from the various
provinces of Egypt, while he sent a number of emis.
saries into Asia, who were instructed to raise a large
body of mercenaries in that quarter. At last all was
ready, and Menephthah appointed the fourteenth day.
as that on which he would place himself at the head,
of his army and lead them in person against the
enemy; but, before the day came, his courage failed
him, He “saw in a dream at least so he himself
260 MENEPHTHAH 1.
declares—“as it were a figure of the god Phthah,
standing so as to prevent his advance;” and the
figure said to him,“ Stay where thou art, and let thy
troops proceed against the enemy.” So the pious
king, in obedience to this convenient vision, remained
secure behind the walls of Memphis, and sent his
forces, native and mercenary, into the nome of Pro-
sopis against the Libyans. The two armies joined
battle on the 3rd of Epiphi (May 18),and a desperate
engagement took place, in which, after six hours of
hard fighting, the Egyptians were victorious, and the
confederates suffered a severe defeat. Menephthah
charges the Libyan chief with cowardice, but only
because, after the battle was lost, he precipitately
quitted the field, leaving behind him, not only his
camp-equipage, but his throne, the ornaments of his
wives, his bow, his quiver, and his sandals. The
reproaches uttered recoil upon himself, Whose con-
duct is the more cowardly, that of the man who fights
at the head of his troops for six hours against an
enemy, probably more numerous, certainly better
armed and better disciplined, and only quits the field
when his forces are utterly overthrown and put to
flight ; or that of one who avoids exposing himself to
danger, and lurks behind the walls of a fortress while
his soldiers are affronting wounds and death in the
battlefield? There is no evidence that Marmaiu, son
of Deid, in the battle of Prosopis, conducted himself
otherwise than as became a prince and a general;
there is abundant evidence that Menephthah, son of
Ramesses, who declined to be present at the engage-
ment, showed the white feather,
BATTLE OF PROSOPIS, AND ITS RESULTS. 261
‘The defeat of Prosopis was decisive. Marmaiu
lost in slain between eight thousand and nine thou-
sand of his troops, or, according to nother esti-
‘mate, between twelve thousand and thirteen thousand.
Above nine thousand were made prisoners. The
tents, camp-equipage, and cattle, fell into the hands,
of the enemy. The expedition at once broke up and
dispersed. Marmaiu returned into his own land with
a shattered remnant of his grand army, and devoted
himself to peaceful pursuits, or at any rate abstained
from any further collision with the Egyptians. The
mercenaries, whatever the races to which they
reality belonged, learned by experience the wisdom
of leaving the Libyans to fight their own battles, and
are not again found in alliance with them. The
Akaiusha and Luku appear in Egyptian history no
more. The Tursha and Sheklusha do not wholly
disappear, but receive occasional mention among the
races hostile to Egypt. As for the Shartana or
Shardana, they were struck with so much admiration
of the Egyptian courage and conduct, that they
shortly afterwards entered the Egyptian service, and.
came to hold a place among the most trusted of the
yptian troops.
Despite his cowardice in absenting himself from the
battle of Prosopis under the transparent device of a
divine vision, Menephthah took to himself the whole
credit of the victory, and gloried in it as much as if
he had really had a hand in bringing about the result.
“The Lubu,” he says, “were meditating to do evil in
ypt ; they were as grasshoppers; every road was
blocked by their hosts. Then I vowed to lead them
262 NEPHTHAH 1.
captive. 1.0, I vanquished them; I slaughtered them,
making a spoil of their country. I made the land of
Egypt traversable once more ; I gave breath to those
who were in the cities” Egyptian generals, like
Roman poets, had to content themselves with com-
plaining secretly, “ Sic vos non vobis.”
So far as we can tell, no long period elapsed
between the expedition of Marmaiu, son of Deid, and
the second great trouble in which Menephthah was
involved. Moses must have returned to Egypt from
his sojourn in Midian within a year or two of the
death of Ramesses IIL, and cannot have allowed any
very long time to elapse before he proffered the
demand which he was divinely commissioned to
make. Still, as he was timid, and a somewhat un-
willing messenger, he may have delayed both his
return and his first address to Pharaoh as long as he
dared (Ex. iv. 19) ; and if the invasion of Marmaiu
had begun before he had summoned courage to
address Pharaoh a second time, he would then
naturally wait until the danger was past, and the king
could again be approached without manifest impro-
pri In this case, the severe oppression of the
Israclites, which followed the first application of
Moses (Ex. v. 5-23) may have lasted longer than has
generally been supposed; and it may not have been
till Menephthah’s sixth or seventh year that the
divine messenger became urgent, and began to press
his request, and to show the signs and wonders
which alone, as he had been told (I: -4), would
break the spirit of the king. The signs then followed
each other at moderately short intervals, the entire
MENEPHTHAH AND MOSES. 203
series of the plagues not covering a longer space than,
about six months, from October till April. None of
the plagues affected the king greatly except the last,
through which he lost his own eldest son, a bereave
ment mentioned in an inscription. Thi loss, com-
bined with the dread power shown in the infliction
during one night of not less than a million of deaths,
produced a complete revolution in the mind of the
king, and made him as anxious at the moment to
get rid of the Israclites out of his country as he
had previously been anxious to retain them. So he
called for Moses and Aaron by night and said, “ Rise
up, get you forth from among my people, both ye and
the children of Israel, and go, serve the Lord, as ye
hhave said. Also take your flocks and your herds, as
ye have said, and be gone; and bless me also”
(Ex. xi . 31, 32). Moses was prepared for the event,
and had prepared his people. All were ready, with
their loins girded, their sandals on their feet, and
their staves in their hands; the word was given, and
the exodus began. “The children of Israel journeyed
from Rameses to Succoth, about six hundred thousand
on foot that were men, beside children ; and a mixed
multitude went up also with them; and flocks, and,
herds, even very much cattle.”
Hereupon the king's mind underwent another
change. “Unstable as water,” he was certain not
to “excel.” Learning that the Israelites, instead of
marching away into the desert, had after reaching,
its edge turned southward, and were “entangled”
in a comer of his territory, between high mountains
on the one hand, and on the other the Red Sea,
264 MENEPHTHAH 1.
which then stretched far further to the north than,
at present, perhaps to Lake Timseh, at any rate
as far as the “Bitter Lakes,” he thought he saw an
opportunity of following and recovering the fugitives,
whose services as bondsmen he highly valued. Rapidly.
calling together such troops as were tolerably near at
hand, he collected a considerable force of infantry and,
chariots—of the latter more than six hundred—and
following upon the steps of the Hebrews, he caught,
them on the western shore of the Red Sea, encamped
“between Migdol and the sea, over against Baal-
Zephon.” The exact spot cannot be fixed, on account,
of the alterations in the bed of the Red Sea, and the
uncertainty of the ancient geography of Egypt, in
which names so often repeat themselves ; but it was,
probably some part of the region that is now dry.
land, between Suez and the southern extremity of
the Bitter Lakes. Here in hig tides the sea and the
lakes communicated; but on the evening of Meneph-
thah’s arrival, an unusual ebb of the tide, co-operating
with a “strong east wind” which held back the water
of the Bitter Lakes, left the bed of the sea bare for a
certain space; and the Israelites were thus able to
cross during the night from one side of the sea to the
other. As morning dawned, Menephthah, once more
carefully guarding his own person, sent his chariots
in pursuit. The force entered on the slippery and,
dangerous ground, and advanced half-way ; but its
progress was slow ; the chariot-wheels sank into the
soft ooze, the horses slipped and floundered; all was,
disorder and confusion. Before the troops could
extricate themselves, the waters returned on cither
THE DISA RIN THE RED SEA.
hand; a high flow of the tide, the necessary con:
quence of a low ebb, brought in the whelming flo
from the south-east; a strong wind from the Me
terranean, drove down upon them the pent up,
waters of the Bitter Lakes from the north-west. The
channel, which had lately been dry land, became once
and the entire force that had entered it
in pursuit of the Israclites perished. Safe on the
opposite shore, the Israelites saw the utter destruction
of their adversaries, whose dead bodies, driven before
the gale, were cast up in hundreds upon the coast
where they sate encamped (Ex. xiv. 30).
‘The disaster paralyzed the monarch, and he made
no further effort. If the loss was not great numeri-
cally, it affected the most important arm of the service,
and it was the destruction of the very élite of the
Egyptian troops. It was a blow in which the anger
of the Egyptian gods may well have been seen by
some, while others may have regarded it as a revela-
tion of the incompetence of the monarch. ‘The blow
seems to have been followed, within a short time, by
revolt. Menephthah’s last monumental year is his
eighth. A pretender to the crown arose in a certain,
Amon-mes, or Amon-meses, who contested the throne
with Seti IL, Menephthah’s son, and succeeded in
establishing himself as king; but for many years
there raged in Egypt, a5 so often happens when a
state is suddenly weakened, civil war, bloodshed, and
confusion.
The two dynasties that have last occupied us con-
stitute the most brilliant period of Egyptian archit
ture; for, as Fergusson, the latest historian of archi-
266 MENEPHTHAH 1.
tecture, has said, the hall of Seti at Karnak is “the
greatest of man’s architectural works,” the building
to which it belongs is “the noblest effort of archi-
tectural magnificence ever produced by the hand of
man,” and the rock-cut temple of Ipsambul is “the
finest of its class known to exist anywhere.” ‘Thes~
works combine enormous and size with a pro
fusion of elaborate ornamentation. Covering nearly
as much ground as the greatest of the pyramids, and
containing equally enormous blocks of stone, the
Theban palace-temples unite a wealth of varied orna-
mentation almost unparalleled among the edifices
erected by man. Here are long avenues of sphinxes
and colossi, leading to tall, tapering obelisks which
shoot upwards like the pinnacles, towers, and spires of
a modern cathedral, while beyond the obelisks are
vistas of gateways and courts, of colonnades and
pillared halls, that impress the beholder with a deep
sense of the constructive nation of the architect,
who could design them, no less than with admiration
of the ruler whose resources were sufficient to make
them realities.
Truly the Egyptians were, as Mr. Fergusson en-
thusiastically asserts, “the most essentially a building
people of all those we are acquainted with, and the
most generally successful in all that they attempteé,
in this way. The Greeks, it is true, surpassed them
in refinement and beauty of detail, and in the class
of sculpture with which they ornamented their build-
ings, while the Gothic architects far excelled them in
constructive cleverness; but with these exceptions,
no other styles can be put into competition with
ARCHITECTURE AND ART OF THE TIME. 267
them. At the same time, neither Grecian nor Gothic
architects understood more perfectly all the grada-
tions of art, and the exact character that should be
fen to every form and every detail... They
understood also better than any other nation, how to
use sculpture in combination with architecture, and
to make their colossi and avenues of sphinxes group
themselves into parts of one great design, and at the
same time to use historical paintings, fading by in-
sensible degrees into hieroglyphics on the one hand,
and into sculpture on the other, linking the whole
together with the highest class of phonetic utterance.
With the most brilliant colouring, they thus har-
monized all these arts into one great whole, unsur-
passed by anything the world has seen during the
thirty centuries of struggle and aspiration that have
elapsed since the brilliant days of the great kingdom
of the Pharaohs.”
Not only did architecture and the glyphic art reach
such perfection during this period, but the arts of Ii
made considerable progress. ‘The royal costumes be-
came suddenly most elaborate ; brilliant colours, costly
armlets and bracelets, many-hued collars, complicated
head-dresses, elegant sandals, jewels of price, gay
sashes, and wigs with conventional adornment, came
to vogue. Luxury was exhibited in the designs of
the dwellings of the wealthy; the grounds were laid
‘out with formal courts and alleys, palms and vines
adorned them, ponds and reservoirs gave freshness to
the summer temperature, irrigation clothed the lawns,
with verdure, Inside, there was richly carved furni
ture covered with cushions of delicate stuffs, and
268 ED PHTHAR 1.
adding the harmony of colour to the luxurious
The horse, which had been introduced from Asia,
helped in the march of extravagance and refinement;
the chariot took the place of the palanquin, and there
was a new opportunity for adornment in the trappings,
as well as in the construction of light or heavy
vehicles.
At the same time, letters made equal progress;
men of wisdom devoted themselves to the preserva-
tion of the knowledge of the past, and to the com-
position of original works in history, divinity, poetry,
correspondence, and practical philosophy, for the
preservation of which a public library was established
at Thebes undera competent director. The highest
perfection thus reached in the arts of peace seems to
have been coincident with an advance in. sensualism ;,
indecency in apparel was common, polygamy in:
creased, woman lost her former degree of purity 5,
cruelty and barbarism were more and more common,
; taxation bore heavily and without pity upon
the lower orders, and the wretched fella in were
beaten by the severest of tyrants, the irresponsible.
tax-gatherer; women as well as men were stripped,
for the indignity and pain of the terrible bastinado;,
and even dead enemies were mutilated for the purpose
of preserving evidence of their numbers.
XVII.
‘THE DECLI OF EGYPT UNDER THE LATER
RAMESSIDES,
THE troublous period which followed the death of
Menephthah issued finally in complete anarchy. Egypt
broke up into nomes, or cantons, the chiefs of which
acknowledged no superior, It was as though in
land, after centuries of centralized rule, the Heptarchy
had suddenly returned and re-established itself. But
even this was not the worst. The suicidal folly of
internal division naturally provokes foreign attack;
and it was not long before Aarsu, a Syrian chieftain,
took advantage of the state of affairs in Egypt to
extend his own dominion over one nome after another,
until he had made almost the whole country subject,
to him. Then, at last, the spirit of patriotism awoke.
Egypt felt the shame of being ruled b a foreigner of
a race that she despised; and a pri yee was. found
after a time, a descendant of the Ramesside line, who
unfurled the national banner, and commenceda war
of independence. This prince, who bore the name
of Set-nekht, or “Set the vietorious,” is thought by
some to have been a son of Seti II, and soa grand-
son of Menephthah ; but the evidence is insufficient to
establish any such relationship. ‘There is reason to
270 EGYPT UNDER THE LATER RAMESSIDES.
believe that the blood of the nineteenth dynasty, of
Seti I. and Ramesses IT, ran in his veins; but no
particular relationship to any former monarch can be
made out. And certainly he owed his crown less to
his descent than to his strong arm and his stout hear
It was by dint of severe fighting that he forced
way to the throne, defeating Aarsu, and gradually
reducing all Egypt under his power.
Set-nekht’s reign must have been short. He set
himself to “put the whole land in order, to execute
the abominables, to set up the temples, and re-estab-
lish the divine offerings for the service of the gods,
as their statutes prescribed.” But he was unable to
effect very much, He could not even discharge
properly the main duty of a king towards himself,
which was to prepare a fitting receptacle for his re
mains when he should quit the earth. To excavate
a rock-tomb in the style fashionable at the day was
a task requiring several years for its due accomplish-
ment; Set-nekht felt that he could not look forward
to many years—perhaps not even to many months —
of life. In this difficulty, he felt no shame in appro-
priating to himself a royal tomb recently constructed
by a king, named Siphthah, whom he looked upon as
a usurper, and therefore as unworthy of consideration,
In this sepulchre we see the names of Siphthah and,
his queen, Taouris, erased by the chisel from their
cartouches, and the name of Set-nekht substituted
in their place. By one and the same act the king
punished an unworthy predecessor, and provided
himself with a ready-made tomb befitting his
dignity.
ACCESSION OF RAMESSES II. a7t
Tt was also, probably, on account of his advanced
age at his accession, that he almost immediately asso
ciated in the kingdom his son Ramesses, a prince of
much promise, whom he made “Chief of On,” and,
viceroy over Lower Egypt, with Heliopolis (On) for
his residence and capital. Ramesses the Third, as he
is commonly called, was one of the most distinguished
of Egyptian monarchs, and the last who acquired any.
great glory until we come down to the time of the
Ethiopians, Shabak and Tirhakah. He reigned as
sole monarch for thirty-one years, during the earlier
portion of which period he carried on a number of
important wars, while during the later portion he
employed himself in the construction of those mag-
nificent buildings, which have been chiefly instru-
mental in carrying his name down to posterity, and
in other works of utility. Lenormant calls him “ the
last of the great sovereigns of Egypt,” and observes,
with reason, that though he never ceased, during the
whole time that he occupied the throne, to labour
hard to re-establish the integrity of the empire abroad,
and the prosperity of the country at home, yet his
wars and his conquests had a character essentially
defensive ; his efforts, like those of the Trajans, the
Marcus Aurelius’s and the Septimius Severus's of hi
tory, were directed to making head against the ever
rising flood of barbarians, which had already before
his time burst the dykes that restrained it, and though,
‘once driven back, continued to dash itself on every
side against the outer borders of the empire, and to
presage its speedy overthrow. His efforts were, on
the whole, successful; he was able to uphold and
272 BGYPP UNDER THE LATER RAMESSIDES.
preserve for same considerable time longer the ter
torial greatness which the nineteenth dynasty had
built up a second time. The monumental temple of
Medinet--\bou, near Thebes, is the Pantheon erected
to the glory of this great Pharaoh. Every pylon,
every gateway, every chamber, relates to us the
exploits which he accomplished. Sculptured com-
positions of large dimensions represent his principal
battles.
are times in the world’s history when a rest=
less spirit appears to seize on the populations of large
tracts of country, and, without any clear cause that
can be-alleged, uneasy movements begin. Subdued
mutterings are heard ; a tremor goes through the
nations, expectation of coming change stalks abroad
the air is rife with rumours; at last there bursts out
an eruption of greater or less violence—the destruc-
tive flood overleaps its barriers, and flows forth,
carrying devastation and ruin in one direction oF
another, until its energies are exhausted, or its pro-
gress stopped by some obstacle that it cannot over-
come, and it subsides reluctantly and perforce. Such
a time was that on which Ramesses III. was cast.
Wars threatened him on every side. On his north-
eastern frontier the Shasu or Bedouins of the desert
ravaged and plundered,at once harrying the Egypti
territory and threatening the 'stablishments,
of the Sinaitic region. To the north-west the Liby:
tribes, Maxyes, Asbysta, Auseis, and others, were
exercising a continuous pressure, to which the Egyp-
tians were forced to yield, and gradually a foreign
population was “squatting” on the fertile lands, and,
WAR OF RAMESSES IT. WITH THE LIBYANS. 273
e former possessorsof the soil back upon
the more eastern portion of the Delta. “The Lubu
and Mashuash,” says Ramesses, “were seated in
wypt; they took the cities on the western side
from Memphis as far as Karbana, reaching the Great
River along its entire course (from Memphis nort
wards), and capturing the city of Kaukut. For mai
years had they be Egypt.” Ramesses be;
warlike operations by a campaign against th Shasu,
whose country he invaded and overran, spoiling and,
destroying their cabins, capturing their cattle, slaying
all who resisted him, and carrying back into Egypt a
vast number of prisoners, whom he attached to the
various temples as “sacred slaves.” He then turned
against the Libyans, and coming upon them unex-
pectedly in the tract between the Sebennytic branch
of the Nile and the Canopic, he defeated in a great
battle the seven tribes of the Mashuash, Lubu, Me
basat, Kaikasha, Shai, Hasa, and Bakana, slaughtering
them with the utmost fury, and driving them before
him across the wi tern branch of the river.“ They
trembled before him,” says the n ve historian, “as
the mountain goats tremble before a bull, who stamps
with his foot, strikes with his horns, and makes the
mountains shake as he rushes on whoever opposes
him.” The Egyptians gave no quarter that memo-
rable day. Vengeance had free: course: the slain,
Libyans lay in heaps upon heaps—the chariot wheels
passed over them—the horses trampled them in the
mire. Hundreds were pushed and forced into the
‘marshes and into the river itself, and, if they escaped
the flight of missiles which followed, found for the
most part a watery grave in the strong current.
Ramesses portrays this flight and carnage in the.
most graphic way. ‘The slain enemy strew the ground,
as he advances over them with his prancing steeds,
and in his rattling war-car, plying them moreover
with his arrows as they vainly seck to escape. His
chariot force and his infantry have their share in the,
pursuit, and with sword, or spear, or j clin, strike
down alike the resisting and the unresisting. No one
seeks to take a prisoner. It is a day of vengeance
and of down-treading, of fury allowed to do its worst,
of a people drunk with passion that has cast off all
self. estraint,
E fen passion exhausts itself at last,
ry of slaughter Having suffi
revenged themselves in the great battle, and the
pursuit that followed it, the Egyptians relaxed some-
what from their policy of extreme hostility. ‘They
made large number of the Libyans prisoners, branded
them with a hot iron, as the Persians often did their
prisoners, and forced them to join the naval service
and serve as mariners on board the Egyptian fleet.
ter importance they confined in
fortresses. The women and children became the,
slaves of the conquerors ; the cattle, “too numerous,
to count,” was presented by Ramesses to the Priest-
College of Ammon at Thebes.
So far success had crowned his arms; and it may
well be that Ramesses would have been content with
the military glory thus acquired, and have abstained
from further expeditions, had not he been forced
within a few years to take the field againsta powerful
INVASION OF EGYPT BY LAND AND SEA. 275
‘combination of new and partly unheard-of enemies
‘The uneasy movement among the nations, which has,
been already noticed, had spread further afield, and
now agitated at once the coasts and islands of South-
Eastern Europe, and the more western portion of
Asia Minor, nations banded themselves to-
gether, and resolved to unite their forces, both naval
and military, against Egypt, and to attack her both,
by land and sea, not now on the north-western frontier,
where some of them had
but in exactly the opposite quarter, by way of Syria,
and Palestine. Of the seven, three had been among,
her former adversaries in the time of Menephthah,
namely, the Sheklusha, the Shartana, and the Tursh:
while four were new antagonists, unknown at any
former period. ‘There were, first, the Tanauna, in
whom it is usual to sce cither the Danai of the
Peloponnese, so celebrated in Homer, or the Daunii
of south-eastern Italy, who bordered on the Tapyges;
secondly, the Tekaru, or Teucrians, a well-known,
people of the Troad ; thirdly, the Uashasha, who are
identified with the Oscans or Ausones, neighbours of
the Daunians; and fourthly, the Purusata, whom some
explain as the Pelasgi, and others as the Philistine:
‘The lead in the expedition was taken by these last.
At their summons the islands and shores of the
Mediterranean gave forth their piratical hordes—the
sea was covered by their light galleys and swept
by their strong oars—Tanauna, Shartana, Sheklusha,
‘Tursha, and Uashasha combined their squadrons into
a powerful fleet, while Purusata and Tekaru advanced
in countless numbers along the land. ‘The Purusata
were especially bent on effecting a settlement; they,
marched into Northern Syria from Asia Minor accom-
panied by their wives and children, who were mounted.
pon carts drawn by oxen, and formed a vast un
ldy crowd. ‘The other nations sent their sailors
and their warriors without any such encumbrances.
Bursting through the passes of Taurus, the combined
Purusata and Tekaru spread themselves over Northern,
Syria, wasting and plundering the entire country of
the Khita, and proceeding eastward as far as Carche-
mish “by Euphrates,” while the ships of the remain
1g confederates coasted along the Syrian shore.
Such resistance as the Hittites and Syrians made was
wholly ineffectual. “No people stood before their
arms.” Aradus and Kadesh fell. The conquerors
pushed on cowards Egypt, anticipating an easy v
tory. But their fond hopes were doomed to disap-
ointment,
Ramesses had been informed of the designs and’
approach of the enemy, and had had ample time to,
make all needful preparations. He had strengthened
frontier, called out all his best-disciplined troops
and placed the mouths of the Nile in a state of
defence by means of forts, strong garrisons, and
flotillas upon the stream and upon the lakes adjacent,
He had selected an cligible position for encountering
the advancing hordes on the coast route from G
to Egypt, about halfway between Raphia and Pelu-
sium, where a new fort had been built by his orders.
At this point he took his stand, and calmly awaited
his enemies, not having neglected the precaution to
set an ambush or two in convenient places. Here, as,
DOUBLE DEFEAT OF THE INVADERS. 277
he kept his watch, the first enemy to arrive was the
land host of the Purusata, encumbered with its long
train of slowly moving bullock-carts, heavily Jaden
with women and children. Ramesses instantly at-
tacked them—his ambushes rose up out of their
places of concealment—and the enemy was beset on
every side. ‘They made no prolonged resistance.
Assaulted by the disciplined and seasoned troops of
the Egy the entire confused mass was easily
defeated. Twelve thousand five hundred men were
slain in the fight; the camp was taken; the army
shattered to pieces. Nothing was open to the sur-
vivors but an absolute surrender, by which life was
saved at the cost of perpetual servitude,
The danger, however, was as yet but half over-
‘come—the snake was scotched but not killed. For
as yet the fleet remained intact, and might land its
thousands on the Egyptian coasts and carry fire and
sword over the broad region of the Delta. The
Tanauna and their confederates—Sheklusha, Shar-
tana, and —made rapidly for the n
motth of the Nile, which was the Pelusiac, and did
their best to effect a landing, But the prec:
taken by Ramesses, before he set forth on his march,
proved sufficient to frustrate their efforts, ‘The Egyp-
tian fleet met the combined squadrons of the enemy
in the shallow waters of the Pelusi
tended with them in a fierce battle, which Ramesses
caused to be represented in his sculptures — the
earliest representation of a sea-fight that has come
down to us. Both sides have ships propelled at once
by sails and oars, but furl their sails before engaging,
Each ship has a single yard, constructed to carrya
igle large square-sail, and hung across the vessel's
single mast at a short distance below the top. The
mast is crowned by a bell-shaped receptacle, large
enough to contain a man, who is generally a slinger
or an archer, placed there to gall the enemy with
stones or arrows, and so to play the part of our own
sharpshooters in the main-tops. The rowers are from,
sixteen to twenty-two in number, besides whom each
vessel carries a number of fighting men, armed with
shields, spears, swords, and bows. The fight is a
promiscuous melée, the two flects being intermixed,
and each ship engaging that next to it, without a
thought of combined action or of manaeuvres. One
of the enemy's vessels is represented as capsized and,
sinking ; the rest continue the engagement Several
are pressing towards the shore of the lagoon, and
the men-at-arms on board them are endeavouring to
effect a landing; but they are met by the land-force
under Ramesses himself, who greet them with such a
hail of arrows as renders it impossible for them to
carry out their purpose.
Tt would seem that Ramesses had no sooner
defeated and destroyed the army of the Purusata
and Tekaru than he set off in haste for Pelusium, and
marched with such speed as to arrive in time to
witness the naval engagement, and even to take a
certain part in it, The invading fleet was so far
successful as to force its way through the opposing
vessels of the Egypti 5, and to press forward towards
the shore; but here its further progress was arrested.
“A wall of iron,” says Ramesses, “shut them in upon
THE FIRST KNOWN SEA-PIGHT. 281
the lake.” The best troops of Egypt lined the banks
of the lagoon, and wherever the invaders attempted
to land they were foiled, Repulsed, dashed to the
ground, hewn down or shot down at the edge of the
water, they were slain “by hundreds of heaps of
corpses.” “The infantry,” says the monarch in his
vainglorious inscription, set up in memory of the
event, “all the choicest troops of the army of Egypt,
stood upon the bank, furious as roaring lions; the
chariot force, selected from among the heroes that
were quickest in battle, was led by officers confident
in themselves. The war-steeds quivered in all their
limbs, and burned to trample the nations under their
feet. I myself was like the god Mentu, the warlike;
I placed myself at their head, and they saw the
achievements of my hands. I, Ramesses the king,
behaved as a hero who knows his worth, and who
stretches out his arm over his people in the day of
combat. The invaders of my territory will gather no
more harvests upon the earth, their life is counted to
them as eternity. . . . Those that gained the shore,I
caused to fall at the water's edge, they lay slain in
heaps; I overturned their vessels; all their goods
sank in the waves” After a brief combat, all resist-
ance ceased. ‘The empty ships, floating at random,
upon the still waters of the lagoon, or stuck fast in
the Nile mud, became the prize of the victors, and,
‘were found to contain a rich booty. ‘Thus ended this
remarkable struggle, in which nations widely severed,
and of various bloods—scarcely, as one would have
thought, known to each other, and separated by a
diversity of interests—united in an attack upon the
foremost power of the known world, traversed several
hundredsof miles of land or sea successfull neither
quarrelling among themselves nor mee
aster from without, and reached the country which,
they had hoped to conquer, but were there completely,
defeated and repulsed in two engagements—one by.
land, the other partly by land and partly by sea—so
that “ their spirit was annihilated, their soul was taken,
from them.” Henceforth no one of the nations which
took part in the combined attack is found in arms
against the power that had read them so severe a
lesson
It was not long after repulsing this attack upon the
independence of Egypt that Ramesses undertook his
“campaign of revenge.” Starting with a fleet and
army along the line that his assailants had followed, he
traversed Palestine and Syria, hunting the lion in the
outskirts of Lebanon, and re-establishing for a time
the Egyptian dominion over much of the region which
hhad been formerly held in subjection by the great
monarchs of the eighteenth and nineteenth dynasties.
He claims to have carried his arms to Aleppo and
Carchemish, in which case we must suppose that he
defeated the Hittites, or else that they declined to,
meet him in the field ; and he gives a list of thirty~
eight conquered countries or tribes, which are thought,
to belong to Upper Syria, Southern Asia Minor, and,
Cyprus. In some of his inscriptions he even speaks
of having recovered Naharaina, Kush, and Punt; but
there is no evidence that he really visited—much less,
conquered—these remote regions,
The later life of Ramesses IIT. was, on the whole,
CLOSING YEARS OF RAM SSES 111. 283
a time of tranquillity and repose, The wild tribes of
after one further attempt to establish
in the western Delta, whi
acquiesced in the lot which nature s
signed them, and, leaving the
contented themselves with the broad tract over which,
they were free to rove between the Mediterranean and,
the Sahara Desert. On the south Ethiopia made no
sign. In the east the Hittites had enough to do to
rebuild the power which had been greatly shattered,
by the passage of the hordes of Asia Minor through
their territory, on th way to Egypt and on their
return from it.
menced their aggressive wars towards the north and
west, having probably still a difficulty in maint
their independence against the attacks of Babylon.
Egypt was left undisturbed by her neighbours for the
space of several generations, and herself ref
disturbing the peace of the world by for
tions, Ramesses turned his attention to building,
commerce, and the planting of Egypt wit He
constructed and ornamented the beautiful temple of
Ammon at Medinet-Abou, built a fleet on the Red
Sea and engaged in trade with Punt, dug a great
reservoir in the country of Aina (Southern Palestine),
and “over the whole land of Egypt planted trees and,
shrubs, to give the inhabitants rest under their cool,
shade.”
The general decline of Egypt must, however, be re-
garded as having commencedin his reign. His
conquests were more specious than solid, result
nominal rather than a real subjection of Palestine and
Syria to his yoke. His subjects grew unaccustomed
to the use of arms during the last twenty, or five and,
twenty, years of his life. Above all, luxury, intrigue,
and superstition invaded the court, where the eunuchs,
J concubines exercised a pernicious influence.
Magic was practised by some of the chief men in the,
State, and the belief was widely spread that it was
possible by charms, incantations, and the use of
waxen images, to bewitch men, or paralyse their
imbs, or even to cause their deaths. Hags were to
be found about the court as wicked as Canidia, who
were willing to sell their skill in the black art to the
highest bidder. The actual person of the monarch
was not sacred from the plottings of this nefarious
crew, who planned assassinations and hatched con-
spiracies in the very purlicus of the royal palace.
Ramesses himself would, apparently, have fallen a.
victim to a plot of the kind, had not the parties to it
been discovered, arrested, tried by a Royal Com=
mission, and promptly executed
‘The descendants of Ramesses IIT. occupied the
throne from his death (about 1¢. 1280) to Bc. 1100.
Ten princes of the name of Ramesses, and one called,
Meri-Tum, bore sway during this interval, each of
them showing, if possible, greater weakness than the,
last, and all of them sunk in luxury, idle, effeminate,
sensual, Ramesses IIL, provoked caricature by his
open exhibition of harem-scenes on the walls of his
Medinet-Abou palace. His descendants, content with
harem life, scarcely cared to quit the precincts of the
royal abode, desisted from all war, and even devolved
the task of government on other shoulders. The
RAPID DECLINE OF THE ARTS. 285
Pharaohs of the twentieth dynasty beame absolute
Fainéants, and devolved their duties on the high-
Priests of the great temple of Ammon at Thebes, who
“set themselves to play the same part which at a
distant period was played by the Mayors of the
Palace under the later French kings of the Mero-
vingian li
In an absolute monarchy, the royal authority is the
mainspring which controls all movements and all
a every part of the Sta e. Let this source of
energy grow weak, and decline at once shows itself
throughout the entire body politic. It is as when a
fatal malady seizes on the seat of life in an individual
—instantly every member, every tissue, falls away
suffers, shrinks, decays, perishes. Egyptian archi
tecture is simply non-existent from the death of
Ramesses IIL to the age of Sheshonk ; the “ grand
style” of pictorial art disappears; sculpture in relief
becomes a wearisome repetition of the same sterco-
typed religious groups ; statuary deteriorates and is
rare; above all, literature declines, undergoing an
almost complete eclipse. A galaxy of literary talent
had, as we have seen, clustered about the reigns of
Ramesses II. and Menephthah, under whose en-
couragement authors had devoted themselves to
history, divinity, practical. philosophy, poeti
lary correspondence, novels, travels, legend.
time of Ramesses III.—nay, from the time of Seti II.
—all isa blank: “ the true poetic inspiration appears
to have vanished,” literature is almost dumb; instead
of the masterpieces of Pentaour, Kakabu, Nebscnen,
Enna, and others, which even moderns can peruse
286 EGYPT UNDER THE LATER RAMESSIDES,
with pleasure, we hi ve only
documents in which “the dry
official tone” prevails — ab-
stracts of trials, lists of func-
tionaries, tiresome enumer
tions in the atest detail of
gifts made to the sods, together
with fulsome praises of the
kings, written either by them-
{ selves or by others, which we
are half inclined to regret the
lapse of ages has spared from
destruction, At the same time
morals falloff, Sensuality dis-
plays itself in high places.
Intrigue enters the charmed
circle of the palace. The mon-
arch himsel zed in in-
decent draw Presently,
the whole idea of a divinity
hedging in the king departs;
iland a “thieves! society” is
formed for rifling the royal
tombs, and tearing the jewels,
with which they have been
ied, from the monarchs’
persons. The king’s life is
imed at by conspirators, who
jdo not scruple to use magical
arts; priests and high judicial
functionaries are implicated in
"the proceedings. Altogether,
DECLID E OF MORALS. 287
the old order seems to be changed, the old ideas
to be upset; and no new principles, possessing
any vital efficacy, are introduced. Society gradually
settles upon its lees; and without some violent appli-
cation of force from without, or some strange upheaval
from within, the nation seems doomed to fall rapidly
to decay and dissolution,
XVI
THE PRIEST-KINGS—PINETEM AND SOLOMON,
‘TnE position of the priests in Egypt was, from the
first, one of hig dignity and influence. ‘Though not,
strictly speaking,a caste, they formed a very distinct
order or class, separated by important privileges, and
by their habits of life, from the rest of the community,
and recruited mainly from among their own sons, and
other near relatives. Their independence and freedom
was secured by a system of endowments. From a
remote antiquity a considerable portion of the land of
Egypt—perhaps as much as one-third—was made
over to the priestly class, large estates being attached,
to cach temple, and held as common property by the
colleges,” which, like the chapters of our cathedrals,
directed the worship of each sacred edifice. These
priestly estates were, we are told, exempt from taxa-
tion of any kind; and they appear to have received
continual augmentation from the piety or superstition,
of the kings, who constantly made over to their
favourite deities fresh “ gardens, orchards, vineyards,
fields,” and even * cities.
‘The kings lived always in a considerable amount
of awe of the priests. Though claiming a certain
qualified divinity themselves, they yet could not but
ATIONS OF THE KINGS AND PRIESTS. 289
be aware that there wer
fections in their own divinity
lute which made it not quitea safe support to
trust to, or lean upon, entire here were other
greater gods than themselves—gods from whom their
‘own divinity was derived; and they could not be
certain what power or influence the priests might not,
have with these superior beings, in whose existence
and ability to benefit and injure men they had the
fullest belief, Consequently, the kings are found to
occupy a respectful attitude towards the priests
throughout the whole course of Egyptian history,
from first to last; and this respectful attitude is
especially maintained towards the great personages,
in whom the hierarchy culminates, the head officials,
or chief priests, of the temples which are the principal
centres of the national worship—the temple of Ra, or
Tum, at Heliopolis, that of Phthah at Memphis, and,
that of Ammon at Thebes. According to the place
where the capital was fixed for the time being, one or
other of these three high-priests had the pre-emi
nence; and, in the later period of the Ramessides,
‘Tnebes having enjoyed metropolitan dignity for be-
tween five and six centuries, the Theban High-Priest
of Ammon was recognized as beyond dispute the chief
of the saccrdotal order, and the next person in the
kingdom after the king.
Tt had naturally resulted from this high position,
and the weight of influence which it enabled its pos-
sessor to exercise, that the office had become here-
ditary. As far back as the reign of Ramesses IX.,
we find that the holder of the position has succeeded
290 THE PRIEST-KINGS—PINETEM AND SOLOMON.
his father in it, and regards himself as high-priest,
ther by natural right than by the will of the king,
The priest of that time, Amenhotep by name, the
son of Ramesses-nekht, undertakes the restoration of
the Temple of Ammon at Thebes of his own proper
motion, “ strengthens its walls, builds it anew, makes
its columns, inserts. in gates the great folding-
doors of acacia wood.” Formerly, the kings were the
builders, and the high-priests carried out their direc
tions and then in the name of the gods gave thanks
to the kings for their pious munificence. Under
the ninth Ramesses the order was reversed—“now
it is the king who testifies his gratitude to the High-
Priest of Amnion for the care bestowed on his temple
by the erection of new buildings and the improve-
ment and maintenance of the older ones.” The
initiative has passed out of the king’s hands i
those of his subject ; he is active, the king is pass
all the glory is Amenhotep’s; the king merely comes
in at the close of all, as an ornamental person, whose,
presence adds a certain dignity to the final ceremony.
Under thelast of the Ramessides the High-Priest
‘of Ammon at Thebes was a certain Her-hor. He was
a man of a pleasing countenance, with features that
were delicate and good, and an expression that was,
mild and agreeable. He had the art so to ing
himself with his sovereign as to obtain at his hi
at least five distinct offices of state besides his
dignity. Hewas “Chief of Upper and Lower Egypt,”
“ Royal son of Cush,” “ Fanbearer on the right hand,
of the King,” “Principal Architect,” and “Admini-
strator of the Granaries.” Some of these offices,
HER-HOR, THE FIRST PRIEST-KING. 291
may have been honorary; but the duties of others
must have been important, and their proper discharge
would have required a vast amount of varied ability.
It is not likely that Herhor possessed all the needful
qualifications ; rather we must presume that he.

grasped at the multiplicity of appointments in order
to accumulate power, so far as was possible, in his
‘own hands, and thereby to be in a better position
2. THE PRIEST-KINGS—PINETEM AND SOLOMON.
to seize the royal authority on the monarch’s demise,
If Ramesses III. died without issue, his task must
have been facilitated ; at any rate, he seems to have
had the skill to accomplish it without struggle or
disturbance; and if, as some suppose, he banished
the remaining descendants of Ramesses IIT. to the
Great Oasis, at any rate he did not stain his priestly,
hands with bloodshed, or force his way to the throne,
through scenes of riot and confusion. Egypt, so far
as appears, quietly acquiesced in his rule, and perhaps
rejoiced to nd herself once more governed by a
prince ofa strong and energetic nature.
For some time after he had mounted the throne,
Herhor did not abandon his priestly functions. He.
bore the title of High-Priest of Ammon regularly
on one of his royal escutchcons, while on the other
he called himself “Her-Hor Si-Ammon,” or “ Her-
Hor, son of Ammon,” following the example of
former kings, who gave themselves out for sons of
Ra, or Phthab, or Mentu, or Horus. But ultimately
he surrendered the priestly title to his eldest son,
Piankh, and no doubt at the same time devolved,
upon him the duties which attached to the high-
priestly office. There was something unscemly in a,
priest being a soldier, and Herhor was smitten with
the ambition of putting himself at the head of an
army, and reasserting the claim of Egypt to a sux
premacy over Syria, He calls himself “the conqueror,
of the Ruten,” and there is no reason to doubt that
he was successful in a Syrian campaign, though to
what distance he penetrated must remain uncertain,
‘The Egyptian monarchs are not very exact in their
PINETEM 1. SUC! EDS HER-HOR, 293
geographical nomenclature, and Herhor may have
spoken of Ruten, when his adversaries were really
the Bedouins of the desert between Egypt and Pales.
tine, The fact that his expedition is unnoticed in,
the Hebrew Scriptures renders it tolerably certain
that he did not effect any permanent conquest, even,
of Palestine,
Herhor's son, Piankh, who became High-Priest of
Ammon on his father’s abdication of the office, does,
not appear to have succeeded him in the kingdom.
Perhaps he did not outlive his father. At any rate,
the kingly office seems to have passed from Herhor
to his grandson, Pinetem, wht. was a monarch of some
distinction, and had a reign of at least twenty-five
years. Pinetem’s right to the crown was disputed
by descendants of the Ramesside line of kings; and,
he thought it worth while to strengthen his title by.
contractinga marriage with a princess of that royal
stock, a certain Ramaka, or Rakama, whose name
appears on his monuments. But compromise with
treason has rarely a tranquillizing effect; and Pine-
tem’s concession to the prejudices which formed the
-trade of his oppon exasperated
them and urged them to greater efforts, The focus
of the conspiracy passed from the Oasis to Thebes,
which had grown disaffected because Pinetem had
removed the seat of government to Tanis in the
Delta, which was the birthplace of his grandfather,
Herhor. So threatening had become the general
aspect of affairs, that the king thought it prudent to
send his son, Ra-men-khepr or Men-khepr-ra, the
existing high-priest of the Temple of Ammon at
294 THE PRIBST-KINGS—PINETE AND SOLOMON.
hhebes, from Tanis to the southern capital,
that he should make himself acquainted
secret strength, and with the designs of the disaffected,
and see whether he could not cither persuade or
coerce them. It was a curious part for the Priest of
Ammon to play. Ordinarily an absentee from Thebes
nd from the duties of his office, he visits the place
as Royal Commissioner, entrusted with plenary
powers to punish or forgive offenders at his pleasure,
His fellow-townsmen are in the main hostile to hi
but the terror of the king's name is such that th
not dare to offer him an, resistance, and he si
out those who appear to h m most guilty for punish-
ment, and has them ex cuted, while he grants the
royal pardon to others without any let or hindrance,
on the part of the civic authorities. ly, having re-
moved all those whom he regarded as really dangerous,
he ventured to conchide his comr fon by granting
a general amnesty to all persons i plicated in the
conspiracy, and allowing the political refugees to
return from the Oasis to Thebes and to live there
unmolested.
Men-khepr-ra soon afterwards became king. He
marrieda wife named Hesi-em-Kheb, who is thought
to havebeen a descendant of Seti I, and thus gave an,
additional legitimacy to the dynasty of Priest-Ki
He also adorned the city of Kheb, the native place
of his wife, with public buildings; but otherwise
nothing is known of the events of his reign, As a
general rule, the priest-kings were no more active or
enterprizing than their predecessors, the Ramessides,
of the twentieth dynasty. ‘They were content to rule
EMPIRE OF DAVID AND SOLOMON. 295
Egypt in peace, and enjoy the delights of sovereignty,
without fatiguing themselves either with the construc-
tion of great works or the conduct of military ex
peditions, If the people that has no history is rightly.
pronounced happy, Egypt may have prospered under
their rule ; but the historian can scarcely be expected
to appreciate a period which supplies him with no,
materials to work upon.
The inaction of Egypt was favourable to the growth
and spread of other kingdoms and empires. Towards
the close of the Ramesside period Assyria had greatly
increased in power, and extended her authority be:
yond the Euphrates as far as the Mediterranean,
After this, causes that are still obscure had caused,
her to decline, and, Syria being left to itself,a new
power grew up in it. In the later half of the eleventh
century, probably during the reign of Men-khepr-ra,
Egypt, David began that series of conquests by
which he gradually built up an empire, uniting in one
all the countries and tribes between the river of
sgypt (Wady-el-Arish) and the Euphrates. Egypt
made no attempt to interfere with his proceedings;
nd Assyria, after one defeat (1 Chron. xix. 16-19),
hdrew from the contest. David's empire was,
inherited by Solomon (1 Kings iv. 21-24); and
Solomon's position was such as naturally brought
him into communication with the great powers be-
yond his borders, among others with Egypt. A
brisk trade was carried on between his subjects and
the Egyptians, especially in horses and chariots
(ib. x. 28, 29): and diplomatic intercourse was no
doubt established between the courts of Tanis and
290 THE PRIEST-KINGS—PINETEM AND SOLOMON.
Jerusalem. It is a little uncertain which Egy,
prince was now upon the throne; but Egyptologers,
incline to Pinetem IL, the second in succession after
Men-khepr-ra, and the last king but one of the
dynasty. ‘The Hebrew monarch having made over-
tures through his ambassador, thi prince, it would
seem, received th m favourably ; and, soon after
his accession (1 Ki \g8 fi, 1), Solomon took to wife
his daughter, an Egyptian princess, receiving with
her as a dowry the city and territory of Gezer,
which Pinetem had recently taken from its inde-
pendent Canaanite inhabitants (ib. ix. 16). The
new connection had advantages and disadvantages.
‘The excessive polygamy, which had been affected
by the Egyptian monarchs ever since the time of
Ramesses IL, naturally spread into Judea, and * King
Solomon loved strange women, together with
the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites,
Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites
and he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and,
three hundred concubines ; and his wives turned away,
his heart” (ib. xi. 1, 3). On the other hand, com-
merce was no doubt promoted by the step taken,
and much was learnt in the way of art from the,
Egyptian sculptors and architects. The burst of
architectural vigour which distinguishes Solomon's,
reign among those of other Hebrew kings, is mani-
festly the direct result of ideas brought to Jerusalem
from the capital of the Pharaohs. The plan of the
‘Temple, with its open court in front, its porch, its
Holy Place, its Holy of Holies, and its chambers,
was modelled after the Egyptian pattern, ‘The two,
ART. 297
pillars, Jachin and Boaz, which stood in front of the
porch, took the place of the twin obelisks, which in
every finished example of an Egyptian temple stood,
just in front of the principal entrance. ‘The lions on
the steps of the royal throne (ib. x. 20) were imita-
tions of those which in Egypt often supported the
seat of the monarch on either side; and “the house
of the forest of Lebanon” was an attempt to repro-
duce the effect of one of Egypt's “pil
Something in the architecture of Solomon wa
learnt from Phoenicia, and a little—a very litt
pethaps have be n derived from Assyria; but Egypt
gave at once the impulse and the main bulk of the
ideas and forms.
The line of priest-kings terminated with Hor
seb-en-sha, the sue ssor of inetem H. They held
the throne for abouta century and a quarter; and if
they cannot be said to have played a very important
part in the “story of Egypt,” or in any way to have
increased Egyptian greatness, yet at least they escape
the reproach, which rests upon most of the more
distinguished dynasties, of seeking their own glory in
modes which caused their subjects untold suffering.
Bair
SHISHAK AND HIS DYNASTY,
THE rise of the twenty-second resembles in many
respects that of the twenty-first dynasty. In both
cases the cause of the revolution is to be found in the,
weakness of the royal house, which rapidly loses its
pristine vigour, and is impotent to resist the first,
assault made upon it by a bold aggressor. Perhaps
the wonder is rather that Egyptian dynasties con-
tinued so long as they did, than that they were not
longer-lived, since there was in almost every instance
pid decline, alike in the ply'sigue and in the mental
calibre of the holders of sovereignty ; so that nothing,
but a little combined strength and audacity was,
requisite in order to push them from their pedestals.
Shishak was an official of a Semitic family long,
settled in Egypt, which had made the town of Bus
bastis its residence. V ¢ may suspect, if we that
the family had noble—shall we say royal ?
veins, and could trace its descent to dynasties
which had ruled at Nineveh or Babylon, ‘The con-
nexion is possible, though scarcely probable, since no
éclat attended the first arrival of the Shishak family
in Egypt, and the family hs
decidedly neither Babylonian nor Assyri
SHISHAK’S FOREIGN ORIGIN. 200
tempting to adopt the sensational views of writer
who, out of half a dozen names, manufacture an
Assyrian conquest of Egypt, and the establishment
on the throne of the Pharaohs of a branch derived
from one or other of the royal Mesopotamian housesj
but “facts are stubborn things,” and the imagination
is scarcely entitled to mould them at its will. It is
necessary to face the two certain facts—(1) that no one
astic names is the natural representative of
by any Assyrian
or Babylonian; and (2) that neither Assyria not
Babylonia was at the time in such 2 position as to
effect, or even to conteraplate, distant enterprize
Babylonia did not at ain such a position till the time
of Nabopolassar; Assyria had enjoyed it about nc.
1150-1100, but had lost it, and did not recover it ti
LC. 890. Moreover, Solomon's empire blocked the
way to Egypt against both countries, and required to,
be shattered in pieces before cither of the great Meso-
potamian powers could have sent a corps @armée into
the land of the Pharaohs.
therefore regard
Shishak (Sheshonk) simply as a member of a family
which, though of foreign extraction, had been long
settled in Egypt, and had worked its way into a high
mn_under the priest-kings of Herhor's line, re-
ng a special connection with Bubastis, the place
ich it had from the first made itshome. Sheshonk’s
grandfather, who bore the same name, had had the
honour of intermarrying into the royal house, having
taken to wife Meht-en-hont,a princess of the blood,
whose exact parentage is unknown to us. His father,
300 SHISHAK AND HIS DYNASTY.
Namrut, had held a high military office, being com-
mander of the Libyan mercenaries, who at this time
formed the most important part of the standing arm
Sheshonk himself, thus descended, was naturally in
the front rank of Egyptian court-officials, When we
first hear of him he is called “ His Highness;
given the title of “Prince of the princes,” which is
thought to imply that he enjoyed the first rank among,
all the chiefs of mercenaries, of whom there were
many. Thus he held a position only second to that
‘occupied by the king,and when his son became a suitor
for the hand of a daughter of the reigning sovereign,
no one could say that etiquette was infringed, or an
ambition displayed that was excessive and unsuitable.
The match was consequently allowed to come off, and
Sheshonk became doubly connected with the royal
house, through his daughter-in-law and through his
grandmother. When, therefore, on the death of
Hor-pa-seb-en-sha, he assumed the title and fune-
tions of king, no opposition was offered: the crown,
seemed to have passed simply from one member of,
the royal family to another.
In monarchies like the Egyptian, it is not very diffi-
cult for an ambitious subj ig a certain
position, to seize the throne; but it is far from easy,
for him to retain it Unless there is a general im-
pression of the usurper’s activity, energy, and vigour,
his authority is liable to be soon disputed, or even set
at nought. It behoves him to give indications of
strength and breadth of character, or of a wise, far=
seeing policy, in order to deter rivals from attempting
to undermine his power. Sheshonk carly let it be
FEROBOAM AT SHISHAK’S COURT. 30%
seen that he possessed both caution and far-reaching
views by his treatment of a refugee who, shortly after
his accession, sought his court. This was Jeroboam,
one of the highest officials in the neighbouring kin;
dom of Israel, whom Solomon, the great Israelite
‘monarch, regarded with suspicion and hostility, on
on made by a prophet that he
me future time to be king of Ten Tribes
out of the Twelve. To receive Jeroboam with favour
was necessarily to offend Solomon, and thus to re-
verse the policy of the preceding dynasty, and pave
the way for a rupture with the State which was,
at this time Egypt's most important neighbour.
Sheshonk, nevertheless, accorded a gracious reception,
to Jeroboam ; and the favour in which he ed
at the Egyptian court was an encouragement to the
disaffected among the Israelites, and distinctly fore-
shadowed a time when an even bolder policy would,
be adopted, and a strike made for imperial power.
The time came at Solomon's demise. Jeroboam was,
at once allowed to return to Palestine, and to foment,
the discontent which it was foreseen would terminate
in separation. The two kings had, no doubt, laid
their plans. Jeroboam was first to see what he could,
effect unaided, and then, if difficulty supervened, his
powerful ally was to come to his assistance. For the
Egyptian monarch to have appeared in the first
stance would have roused Hebrew patriotism against,
him. Sheshonk waited till Jeroboam had, to a certain
extent, established his kingdom, had set up a new
worship blending Hebrew with Egyptian notions, and
had sufficiently tested the affection or disaffection
towards his rule of the various classes of his subjects,
He then marched out to his assistance. Levying a
force of twelve hundred chariots, sixty thousand horse
(2 six thousand), and footmen “ without number” (2
fly from the Libyan and Ethiopian
ath of the
he proceeded into the Holy Land,
entering it “in three columns,” and so spreading his
troops far and wide over the southern country, Re-
hoboam, Solomon's son and successor, had made such.
n as was possible against the attack, He
(anticipated it from the moment of Jeroboam’s
return, and he had carefully guarded the main routes
whereby his country could be approached from the
south, fortifying, among other cities, Shoco, Adullam,
Azekait, Gath, Mareshah, Ziph, Tekoa, and Hebron,
(2 Chron. xi 6-10). But the host of Sheshonk was,
irresistible. Never before had the Hebrews met in
battle the forces of their power
—never before had they been confronted th huge
masses of disciplined troops, armed and trained alike,
and soldiers by profession, ‘The Jewish levies were a
rude and untaught militia, litle accustomed to war-
fare, or even to the use of arms, aiter forty years of
peace, during which “every man had dwelt safely,
under the shade of his own vine and his own fig-tree”
(1 Kings iv. 23). They must have trembled before the
chariots, and cavalry, and trained footmen of Egypt.
Accordingly, there seems to have been no battle, and
no regularly organized resistance. As the host of
Sheshonk advanced along the chief roads that led to
the Jewish capital, the cities, fortified with so much
SHISHAK INVADES JUDEA. 303,
care by Rehoboam, either opened their gates to hi
or fell after brief sieges (2 Chron, xii. 4). Sheshonk’s
march was a triumphal progress, and in an incredibly
short space of time he appeared before Jerusalem,
where Rehoboam and “the princes of Judah” were
tremblingly awaiting his arrival. ‘The son of Solomon
surrendered at discretio ; and the Egyptian conqueror
entered the Holy City, stripped the Temple of its
most valuable treasures, including the shields of gold
which Solomon had made for his body-guard, and
plundered the royal palace (2 Chron xii, 9). The
city generally does not appear to have been sacked;
nor was there any massacre. Rehoboam's submi
was accepted; he was maintained in h
but he had to become Sheshonk’s “ servant” (2 Chron
xi . 8), £2, he had to accept the position of a tributary
prince, owing fealty and obedience to the Egypti
monarch.
The objects of Sheshonk’s expedition were not yet
half accomplished. By the long inscription which he
set up on his return to Egypt, we find that, after
having made Judea subject to him, he proceeded with
his army into the kingdom of Israel, and there also
took a number of towns which were peculiarly cir-
cumstanced. ‘The Levites of the northern kingdom
had from the first disapproved of the religious changes
effected by Jeroboam ; and the Levitical cit es withi
his dominions were regarded with an unfriendly eye
by the Isractite monarch, who saw in them hotbeds
of rebellion, He had not ventured to make a direct
attack upon them himself, since he would thereby
hhave lighted the torch of eivil war within his own
borders ; but, having now an Egyptian army at his,
beck and call, he used the for n instrument
at once to free him from a danger and to execute
his vengeance upon those whom he looked upon as,
traitors. Sheshonk was directed or encouraged to
attack and take the Levitical cities of Rehob, Gibeon,
Mahanaim, Beth-horon, Kedemoth, Bileam or Ibleam,
Alemoth, Taanach, Golan, and Anem, to plunder
them and carry off their inhabitants as slaves; while
he was also persuaded to reduce a certain number of
Canaanite towns, which did not yield Jeroboam a
very willing obedience. We may trace the march of
Sheshonk by Megiddo, Taanach, and Shunem, to
Beth-shan, and thence across the Jordan to Mahanaim,
and Aroer ; after which, having satisfied his vassal,
Jeroboam, he proceeded to make
‘account with the Arab tribes adjoining on 1
Jordanic Israel, and subdued the Temanites, the
Edomites, and various tribes of the Hagarenes. His
dominion was thus established from the borders of
xypt to Galilee, and from the Mediterranean to the
Great Syrian Desert.
On his return to Egypt from Asia, with
prisoners and his treasures, it seemed to the
torious monarch that he might fitly follow the example
of the old Pharaohs who had made expeditions into
Palestine and Syria, and commemorate his achieve-
ments by a sculptured record. So would he best
impress the mass of the people with his merits, and,
induce them to put him ona par with the Thothe
meses and the Amenhoteps of former ages. On the,
southern external wall of the great temple of Karnak,
RECORD OF ¥UD:RA'S CONQU BST. 305
he caused himself to be represented twice—once as
holding by the hair of their heads thirty-eight captive
Asiaties, and threatening them with uplifted mace;
and a second time as leadi z captive one hundred
and thirty-three cities or tribes, each specified by
name and personified in an individual form, the form,
however, being incomplete. Among these representa-
FIGURE RECORDING
THLE CONQUEST OF JUDA BY si
tions is one which bears the inscription * Yutch
Malek,” and which must be regarded as figurin,
captive Judwan kingdom.
‘Thus, after nearly a century and a half of repose,
yypt appeared once more in Western Asia as a
conquering power, desirious of establishing an empire.
‘The political edifice raised with so much trouble by
David, and watched over with such care by Solomon,
had been shaken to its base by the rebellion of Jero-
boam ; it was shattered beyond all hope of recovery,
by Shishak. Never more would the fair fabric of an
Israclite empire rear itself up before the eyes of men ;
never more would Jerusalem be the capital of a State
asextensive as Assyria or Babylonia, and as populous
as Egypt. After seventy years, or so, of union, Syria
was broken up—the cohesion effected by the war-
like might of David and the wisdom of Solomon
ceased—the ill-assimilated parts fell asunder; and,
once more the broad and fertile tract intervening be-
tween Assyria and xypt became divided among a
score of petty States, whose weakness invited a con-
queror.
Sheshonk did not live many years to enjoy the glory
and honour brought him by his Asiatic successes.
He died after a reign of twenty-one years, leaving hi
crown to his second son, Osorkon, who was married
to the Princess Keramat,a daughter of Sheshonk’
predecessor. The dynasty thus founded continued
to occupy the Egyptian throne for the space of about
two centuries, but produced no other monarch of any.
remarkable distinction. ‘The Asiatic dominion, which
Sheshon: had established, seems to have been main-
tained for about thirty years, during the reigns of
Osorkon I, Sheshonk’s son, and Takelut I, his grand-
son ; but in the reign of Osorkon IL, the son of Take-
lut, the Jewish monarch of the time, Asa, the grandson,
of Rehoboam, shook off the Egyptian yoke, re-estab-
lished Judwan independence, and. fortified himself
against attack by restoring the defences of all those
JUDEA REVOLTS UNDER 307
cities which Sheshonk had mantled, and “ making
about them walls, and towers, gates, and bars” (2
Chron. xiv. 7). At the same time he placed under
arms the whole male population of his kingdom,
which is reckoned by the Jewish historian at 580,000
men, The “men of Judah” bore spears and targets,

or small round shields; the * men of Benjamin” had
shields of a larger size, and were armed with the bow
(ib. ver. 8). “All these,” says the historian, “ were
mighty men of valour.” It was not to be supposed
that Egypt would bear tamely this defiance, or sub-
mit to the entire loss of her Asiatic dominion, which,
was necessarily involved in the revolt of Juda,
without an effort to retain it. Osorkon IL, or who-
ever was king at the time, rose to the occasion, If it
was to be a contest of numbers, Egypt shonld show
that she was certainly not to be outdone numerically;
so more mercenaries than ever beforewere taken into
pay, and an army was levied, which is reckoned at
a thousand thousand” (ib. ver. 9), consisting of
Cushites or Ethiopians, and of Lubim (ib. xvi. 8),
or natives of the North African coast-tract. With
the nt a picked force of three hundred war-
chariots, probably Egyptian; and the entire host was
placed under the command of an Ethiopian general,
who is called Zerah, ‘The host set forth from Egypt,
confident of victory, and proceeded as far as Mareshah
in Southern Judixa, whefe they were metby the
daunted Jewish king. What force he had brought with
him is uncertain, but the number cannot have been,
very great. Asa had recourse to prayer, and, in words
echoed in later days by the great Maccabee(1 Mac.
18, 19), besought Jchovah to help him against the
Egyptian multitude.” Then the two armies joined
battle ; and, notwithstanding the disparity of numbers
Zerah was defeated. “The Ethiopians and the L
a huge host, with very many chariots and hors
men” (2 Chron. xvi. 8) fled before Judah—they were
“overthrown that they could not recover themselves,
and were destroyed before Jehovah and before His
host” (jb. xiv. 13). ‘The Jewish troops pursued them
as far as Gerar, smiting them with a great slaughter,
taking their camp, and loading themselves with spoi
DEFEAT OF ZERAN—IT 309
What became of Zerah we are not told. Perhaps he
fell in the battle; perhaps he carried the news of his,
defeat to his Egyptian master, and warned him against
further efforts to subdue a people which could
and itselfso effectually.
The direct effect of the victory of Asa was to put
an end, for three centuries, to those dreams of Asiatic
had so long floated before the eyes
igs, and dazzled their imaginations, If
whose rule
Syria was divided could defeat and destroy the largest,
army that Egypt had ever brought into the field, what
hope was there of victory over twenty or thirty of such,
chieftains? Henceforth, until the time of the great
revolution brought about in Western Asia through the
destruction of the Assyrian Empire by the Medes, the
eyes of Egypt were averted from Asia, unless when
attack threatened her. She shrank from provoking
the repetition of such a defeat as Zerah had suffered,
and was careful to abstain from all interference with
the affairs of Palestine, except on invitation. She
Iearnt to lool: upon the two Israclite kingdoms as her
bulwarks against attack from the East, and it became
an acknowledged part of her policy to support them
against Assyrian aggression. If she did not succeed
in rendering them any effective assistance, it was not,
for lack of good-will. She was indeed a “bruised
reed” to lean upon, but it was because her strength
‘was inferior to that of the great Mesopotamian power.
From the time of Osorkon IL, the Sheshonk dy-
nasty rapidly declined in power. A system of consti-
tuting appanages for the princes of the reigning house
310 SHISHAK AND 11S DYNASTY.
grew up, and in a short time conducted the country,
to the verge of dissolution. “For the purpose of
avoiding usurpations analogous to that of the Highs
Priests of Ammon,” says M. Maspero, “ Sheshonk
and his descendants made a rule to entrust all post
tions of importance, whether civil or military, to the
nees of the blood royal. A son of the reigning
haraoh, most commonly his eldest son, held the office
of High-Priest of Ammon and Governor of Thebes;
another commanded at Sessoun (Hermopolis) ; an-
other at Hakhensu, others in all the large towns of
the Delta and of Upper Egypt. Each of them had
with him several battalions of those Libyan soldiers
Matsiou and Mashuash—who formed at this time the
strength of the Egyptian army, and on whose fidelity
it was always . Ere long these com-
mands be and the feudal system,
which had prevailed among the chiefs of
nomes or cantons,re-established itself forthe advantage
of the members of the reigning house. ‘The Pharaoh
of the time continued to reside at Memphis, or at
Bubastis, to receive the ta s, to direct as far as was
possible the central ai tration, and to preside at
the grand ceremonies of religion, such as the enthrone-
ment or the burial of an Apis-Bull; but, in point of
fact, Egypt found itself divided into a certain number
ot principalities, some of which comprised only a few
towns, while others extended over several continuous
cantons. After a time the chiefs of these prineipali-
ties were emboldened to reject the sovereignty of the
Pharaoh altogether ; relying on their bands of Libyan,
‘mercenaries, they usurped, not only the functions of
DISINTEGRATION OF EGYPT. 3
royalty, but even the title of king, while the
coped up in a comer of the Delta,
difficulty preserved a certain remnant of authority.
Upon disintegration followed, as a natural conse-
quence, quarrel and disturbance. In the reign of
Takelut IL, the grandson of Osorkon IL, troubles
broke out both in the north and in the south. Tak
lut’s eldest son, Osorkon, who was High-Priest of
Ammon, and held the government of Thebes and the
other provinces of the south, was only able to mai
tain the integrity of the kingdom by means of per-
petual civil wars, Under his successors, Sheshonk III,
Pamai, and Sheshonk 1V,, the revolts became more
and more serious. Rival dynasties established them-
selves at Thebes, Tanis, Memphis, and elsewhere.
Ethiopia grew more powerful as Egypt declined, and,
threatened ere long to establish a. preponderatin
influence over the entire Nile valley. But the Egyp-
tian princes were too jealous of each other to appre-
ciate the danger which threatened them. A ve
epidemic of decentralization set in; and by the
middle of the eighth century, just at the time when
Assyria was uniting together and blending into one
all the long-divided tribes and nations of Western
pt suicidally broke itself up into no fewer
than twenty governments !
Such a condition of things was, of course, fatal to
literature and art, Art, as has been said, * did not so,
much decline as disappear.” After Sheshonk I. no,
monarch of the line left any building or sculpture of
the slightest importance. The very tombs became.
unpretentious, and merely repeated antique forms
yr2 SHISHAK AND HIS DYNASTY.
without any of the antique spirit. Each Apis, indeed,
had, in his turn, his arched tomb cut for him in the
solid rock of the Serapeum at Memphis, and was laid,
to rest in a stone sarcophagus, formed of a single
block. A stela, moreover, was in every
and set up to his memory: but the stela: were rude
memorials, devoid of all artistic taste; the tombs
were mere reproductions of old models; and the it
scriptions were of the dullest and most prosaic kind
Here is one, as a specimen; “In the 2, the
month Mechir, on the first day of the month, under
the reign of King Pimai, the god Apis was carried to
his rest in the beautiful region of the west, and was
laid in the grave, and deposited in his everlasting
smal abode. He was born in the year
28, in the time of the deceased king, Sheshonk IIT.
His glory was sought for in all places of Lower Egypt.
He was found after some months in the city of Hashed-
abot. He was solemnly introdvced into the temple
of Phthah, beside his father—che Memphian god
Phthah of the south wall—by the high-priest in the
temple of Phthah, the great prince of the Mashuash,
Petise, the son of the high-priest of Memphis and,
great prince of the Mashuash, Takelut, and of the
princess of royal sace, Thes-bast-per,in the year 28, in
the month of Paophi, on the first day of the month,
‘The full lifetime of this god amounted to twenty-six,
years” Such is the historical literature of the period.
‘The only other kind of literature belonging to it
which has come down to us, consists of what are called
“ Magical Texts.” These are to the following effec
“When Horus weeps, the water that falls from his
DECL E OF ART AND LITERATURE. 313
eyes grows into plants producing a sweet perfume.
When Typhon lets fall blood from his nose, it grows
to plants changing to cedars, and produces turpen-
tine instead of the water. When Shu and Tefnut
weep much, and water falls from their eyes, it changes
into plants that produce incense. When the Sun,
we ps a second time, and lets water fall from his eyes,
it is changed into working bees ; they work in the
flowers of each kind, and honey and wax are produced
instead of the water. When the Sur becomes weak,
he lets fall the perspiration of his members, and this,
changes to a liquid.” Or again—*To make a magic
mixture: Take two grains of incense, two fumiga-
tions, two jars of cedar-oil, two jars of Zas, two jars of
wine, two jars of spirits of wine. Apply it at the
place of thy heart. Thou art protected against the
accidents of life ; thou art protected against a violent
death ; thou art protected against fire; thou art not
ruined on carth, and thou escapest in heaven.
XX,
THE LAND SHADOWING WITH WINGS—EGYPT
UNDER THE ETHIOPIANS
Tue name of Ethiopia was applied in ancient times,
as the term Soudan is applied now, vaguely to
the ast African interior south of Egypt, from about
lat. 24° to about lat . The tract s for the most
part sandy or rocky desert, interspersed with oases,
but contained along the course of the Nile a valuable
strip of territory ; while, south and south-east of the
point where the Nile receives the Atbara, it spread
out into a broad fertile region, watered by n
streams, diversified by nountains and woodlands, rich
in minerals, and of considerable fertility. At no time
id the whole of this vast tract—a thousand miles
long by eight or nine hundred broad—form a single
state or monarchy. Rather, for the most part, was it
divided up among an indefinite number of states,
cher of tribes, some of them herdsmen, others,
hunters or fishermen, very jealous of their indepen-
dence, and frequently at war one with another.
Among the various tribes there was a certain com-
munity of race,a resemblance of physical type, and,
similarity of langua cighbours, the
yyptians, included them all under a single ethnic
EGYPTIAN INFLUENCE IN ETHIOPIA. — 315
name, speaking of them as Kashi or Kushi—a term
manifestly identical with the Cush or Cushi of the
Hebrews. They were a race cognate with the Egyp
tians, but darker in complexion and coarser in feature
—not by any means negroes, but still more nearly,
allied to the negro than the Egyptians were. Their
best representatives in modern times are the pure-
bred Abyssinian tribes, the Gallas, Wolaitzas, and
the like, who are probably their descendants,
The portion of Ethiopia which lay nearest to Egypt
had been from a very early date penetrated by
‘gyptian influence. Wars with “the miserable
Kashi” began as far back as the time of Usurtasen,
L.; and Usurtasen IIL. carried his arms beyond the
Second Cataract, and attached the northern portion
of Ethiopia to Egypt. The great kings of the
eighteenth dynasty, Thothmes IIL, Amenhotep II,
and Amenhotep IIL, proceeded still further south-
ward ; and the last of these monarchs built a temple
to Ammon at Napata, near the modern Gebel Berkal
The Ethiopians of this region, a plastic race, adopted
tent the Egyptian civilization,
n shrines, and
set up inscriptions in the hieroglyphic character and
tongue. Napata, and the Nile valle
both below it and above it, was already half Egyp-
tianized, when, on the establishment of the Sheshonk
dynasty in Egypt, the descendants of Herhor re-
solved to quit their native country, and remove them-
selves into Ethiopia, where they had reason to expect
a welcome. They were probably already connected
by marriage with some of tle leading chicfs of
316 THE LAND SHADOWING WITH WINGS.
Napata, and their sacerdotal character gave them a
great hold on a peculiarly superstitious people. ‘The
princes of Noph” received them with the greatest
favour, and assigned them the highest position in the
state, Retaining their priestly office, they beeame at
once Ethiopian monat and High-Priests of the
Temple of Ammon which Amenhotep IIL. had
erected at Napata, Napata, under their government,
flourished greatly, and acquired a considerable archi:
Fresh temples were built,
adorned the approaches to these new shrines; the

practice of burying the membersof the royal house
in pyramids was reverted to; and the necropolis of
Napata recalled the glories of the old necropolis of,
Memphis,
Napata was also a place of much wealth, The
Kingdom, whereof it was the capital, reached south-
ward as far as the modern Khartoum, and eastward
stretched up to the Abyssinian highlands, including
the valleys of the Atbara and its tributaries, together
with most of the tract between the Atbara and the
Blue Nile, This was a region of great natural wealth,
containing many mines of gold, iron, copper, and salt,
abundant woods of date-palm, almond -trees, and
some excellent pasture-ground, and much rich
meadow-land suitable for the growth of doora and
other sorts of grain. Fish of many kinds, and ex-
cellent turtle, abounded in the Atbara and the other
streams; while the geographical position was favour-
able for commerce with the tribes of the interior, who,
Pu KHI OF NAPATA AND HIS RIVAL 317
were able to furnish an almost inexhaustible supply
fory, skins, and ostrich feathers.
he first monarch ofNapata, whose name has come
down to us, is a certain Piankhi, who called himself
or Meri: Ammon—that is to say, “ beloved
of Ammon He is thought to have been a descen
dant of Herhor, and to have begun to reign about
‘At this time Egypt had reached the state
of extreme disintegration described in the last section.
A prince named Tafnekht, probably of Libyan origin,
ed in the western Delta, and held Sats and Mem-
phis ; an Osorkon was king of the eastern Delta, and,
held his court at Bubastis; Petesis was king of
thribis, near the apex of the Delta ; and a prince
named Aupot, or Shupot, ruled in some portion of
the same region. In Middle Egypt, the tract imme-
iately above Memphis formed the kingdom of Pefaa-
bast, who had his residence in Sutensenen, or Hera-
cleopolis Magna, and held the Fayoum under his
authority ; while further south the Nile valle
the possession ofa certain Namrut, whose ca
Sesennu, or Hermopolis. Bek-en-nefi, and a
had also principalities, though in what exact posi
is uncertain; and various towns, including Mendes,
were under the government of chiefs of mercenaris
of whom it is reckoned that there were more than,
adozen, Thebes and Southern Exypt from about the
latitude of Hermopolis had already been absorbed
into the kingdom of Napata, and were ruled directly
by Piankhi
‘Such being the state of affairs when he came to the
throne, Piankhi contrived between his first and his
twenty-first year (about 1c. +34) gradually to
extend his authority over the other Kings, and to
reduce them to the position of tributary princes or
feudatories. It is uncertain whether he used force
to effect his purpose. Perhaps the fear of the As-
syrians, who, under Tiglath-pileser IT. were about this
time (B.C. 745-730) making great advances in Syria
and Palestine, may have been sufficiently strong to
induce the princes voluntarily to adopt the protection
of Piankhi, whom they may have regarded as an,
Egyptian rather than a foreigner. At any rate, we
do not hear of violence being used until revolt broke
In the twenty-first year of Piankhi, news reached
him that Tafnekht, king of Memphis and Sats, had,
rebelled, and, not content with throwing off his alle-
giance, had commenced a series of attacks upon the
princes that remained faithful to their suzerain, and
was endeavouring to make himself master of the whole
country. Already had he fallen upon Pafaabast, and
forced him to surrender at discretion; he was advanc~
ig up the river; Namrut had joined him; and he
would soon threaten Thebes, unless a strenuous re-
tance were offered. Piankhi seems at first to have
despised his enemy. He thought it enough to send
two generals, at the head of a strong body of troops,
down the Nile, with orders to suppress the revolt,
and bring the arch-rebel into his presence. ‘The ex-
pedition left Thebes. On its way down the river, it
fell in with the advancing fleet of the enemy, and,
completely defeated it. The rebel chiefs, who now
yeluded Petesis, Osorkon, and Aupot, as well as
Tafnekht, Pefaabast, and Namrut, abandoning Her-
PIANKHT'S WAR WITH THE PETTY PRINCES. 310
mopolis and the Middle Nile, fell back upon Suten-
senen or Heracleopolis Magna, where they concen-
irated their forces, and awaited a second attack. This
was not long delayed. Piankhi’s fleet and army,
having besieged and taken Hermopolis, descended
the river to Sutensenen, gave the confederates a
second naval defeat, and disembarking, followed up,
their sucee with another great victory on land, com-
pletely routing the rebels, and d ving them to take
refuge in Lower Egypt, or in the towns on the ri
bank below Heracleopolis. But now a strange reverse
of fortune befell them. Namrut, the Hermopolitan
monarch, hearing of the occupation of his capital by
Piankhi’s army, resolved on a bold attempt to retake
ft; and, having collected a number of ships and
troops, quitted his confederates, sailed up the Nil
besieged the Ethiopian garrison which had been left,
to hold the place, overpowered them, and recovered
his cit
This unexpected blow roused Piankhi from his
inaction. Having collected a fresh army, he quitted
Napata in the first month of the year, and reached
‘Thebes in the second, where he stopped awhile to
perform a number of religious ceremonies; at their
close, he descended the Nile to Hermopolis, invested,
it, and commenced its siege. Moveable towers were
brought up against the walls, from which machines
threw stones and arrows into the city; the defenders
suffered terribly, and after a short time insisted on.
asurrender. Namrut made his peace with his offended,
sovereign through the intercession of his wife with
isters, and daughters, and was allowed
once more to do homage to his lord in the temple of
Thoth, leading his war-horse in one hand and holding
a sistrum, the instrument wherewith it was usual to
approach a god, in the other. Piankhi entered Her-
mopolis, and examined the treasury, store - houses,
and stables, finding in the last a number of horses,
which had been reduced almost to starvation by the
siege. Either on this account, or for some other
reason, Viankhi treated the Hermopolitan pr
coldness, and did not for some time reinstate him in

his kingdom,
Continuing his triumphal march towards the north
Piankhi received the submission of Heracleopolis,
the capital of Pefaabast, and of various other cities
on either bank of the Nile, and in a short time
appeared before Memphis and summoned it to
surrender; but his summons was set at nought.
Tafnekht had recently visited the city, had strength-
ened its defences, augmented its supplies, and rein-
forced its garrison with an addition of eight thousand
men, thereby greatly inspiriting them, It was resolved
PIANKHI VICTORIOUS. 3et
to resist to the uttermost. So the gates were shut,
the walls manned, and Piankhi challenged to do his
worst. “Then was His Majesty furious against
them, like a panther.” Piankhi attacked the city
fiercely, both by land and water. Taking the con
mand of the flect in person, he sailed down the Nile,
and, bringing his vessels close. up to the walls and,
towers on the riverside, made use of the masts and
yards as ladders, and so scaled the fortifications ; then
‘after slaughtering thousands on the ramparts,he forced
an entrance into the town, Memphis, upon this, sur-
rendered. Piankhi entered the town, and sacrificed to
the god Phthah A number of the princes, including,
Aupot and Merkaneshu, a leader of mercenaries,
‘came in and made their submission; but two of the
principal rebels still remained unsubdued—Tafnekht,
the leader of the revolt, and Osorkon, king of Bubastis.
Piankhi procecded against the latter. Advancing
first on Heliopolis, instead of resistance he was re-
ceived with acclamations, the people, priests, and
soldicry having gone over to his side. “Nothing,
succeeds like success.” Egypt was as prone as other
countries to “ worship the rising sun and Piankhi’s
victories had by this time marked him out in the eyes
of the Egyptians as the favourite of Heaven, their pre-
destined monarch and ruler. Accordingly, Heliopolis
received him gladly, hailing him as “the indestructible
Horus”—he was allowed to bathe in the sacred lake,
the precinets of the great temple, to offer sac
fice to Ra, and to enter through the folding-doors
into the central shrine, where were laid up the sacred
boats of Ra and Tum. After this surrender, Osorkon
322. THE LAND SHADOWING WITH WINGS.
thought it vain to attempt further resistance. He
quitted Bubastis, and, seeking the presence of the
victorious Piankhi, submitted himself and renewed
his homage. At the same time, Petisis, king of
Athribis, made his submission.
‘The only prince who still remained unsubdued was
Tafnekht, the original rebel. Tafnekht had fled after
the fall of Memphis, and had taken refuge either in
‘one of the islands of the Delta, or beyond the seas, in
Arad or Cyprus. But he saw that further resistance
in; and that, if he was to rule an Egyptian
principality, it must be as a secondary monarch.
Accordingly he, too, submitted himself, and was:
stored to his former kingdom, ankhi returned up
the Nile to his own city of Napata amid songs and,
rejoicings—whether sincere or feigned, who shalll say?
His own account of the matter is the following:
“When His Majesty sailed up the river, his heart was
glad ; all its banks resounded with music. The i
habitants of the west and of the east betook them-
selves to making melody at His Majesty's approach,
To the notes of the music they sang, ‘O king, thou
conqueror! © Piankhi, thou conquering king! Thou,
hast come and smitten Lower Egypt ; thou madest,
the men as women, The heart of the mother rejoices
who are such a son, for he who begat thee dwells in
the vale of death. Happiness be to thee, © cow that
hast borne the Bull! Thou shalt live for ever in after
ages. ‘Thy victory shall endure, O king and friend
of Thebes !"”
This happy ition of things did not, howev
continue long. Kkhi, soon after his return to h
SHABAK BUR) $ BEK-EN-KANP 32:
capital, died without leaving issue ; and the race of
Herhor being now extinct, the Ethiopians had to
elect a king from the number of their own nobles.
‘Their choice fell on a certain Kashta, a man of little
energy, who allowed Egypt to throw off the Ethiopian
sovereignty without making any effort to prevent it.
nf, the son of Tafnekht, was the leader of
ind is said to have reigned
over all Egypt for six years. He got a name for
wisdom and justice, but he could not alter that con-
dition of affairs which had been gradually brought
about by the slow working of various more or less
occult causes, whereby Ethiopia had increased and
Egypt diminished in power, their relative strength, as
compared with former times, having become inverted.
thiopia, being now the stronger, c to
herself, and did so en-ranf’s seventh year.
Shabak, the son of Kashta, whose character was cast
a far stronger mould than that of his father, having
jounted the Ethiopian throne, lost no time in swoop-
ing down upon Egypt from the upper region, and,
carrying all before him, besieged and took Sais, made
Bek-en-ranf a prisoner, and barbarously burnt him
alive for his rebellion, His fierce and sensuous
physiognomy is quite in keeping with this bloody
deed, which was well cilculated to strike terror into
the Egyptian nation, and to ensure a general sub-
mission,
‘The rule of the Ethiopians was now for some fifty
years firmly established. Shabak founded a dynasty,
which the Egyptians themselves admitted to be legi-
mate, and which the historian Manetho declared to
324 THE LAND sitabowin WITH WING!
have consisted of three kings-
Sevechus (or Shabatok), and
the Hebrew Tirhakah. ‘The extant monuments con-
firm the names, and order of succession, of these
monarchs. They were of a coarser and ruder fibre
than the native » but they did not rule
Egypt in any alien or hostile spirit. On the contrary,
they were pious worshippers of the old Egyptian
gods; they repaired and beautified the old Egyptian,
temples ; and, instead of ruling Egypt, as a conquered,
province, from Napata, they resided permanently, or
at any rate occasionally, at the ian capitals,
‘Thebes and Memphis. There are certain indications,
which make it probable that to some extent they.
pursued the policy of Piankhi, and governed Lower
igypt by means of tributary kings, who held their
courts at Sats, Tanis, and perhaps Bubastis, But
they kept a jealous watch over their subject princes,
and allowed none of them to at ain a dangerous pre-
By a curious coincidence the Ethiopic sway, or ex
ion of influence over Egypt by the great monarchy
of the south, exactly synchronized with the develop-
ment of Assyrian power in south-western Asia, which
bordered Egypt upon the north; and thus were
brought into hostile collision, the twe greatest mili-
tary powers of the then known world who fought
over the prostrate Egypt, like Achilles a.d Hector
over the corpse of Patroclus. Shabak’s conquest of
the Lower Nile valley took place about 1.c. 725 or
724. Exactly at that time Shalmaneser IV. was pro-
ing to extremities against the kingdom of Istacl,
WITH HosEA. 325
s threatening to sweep away one of the last
two feeble barriers which had hitherto been interposed
between the Assyrian territory and the Egyptian.
Shabak, entreated by Hoshea, the last Israclite mon-
arch, to lend him aid, consented to take the kingdom
of Israel under his protection (2 Kings xvi
HEAD OF SIIAUAK.(SABACO).
actuated no doubt by an enlightened view of his own
interest. But when Samaria was besieged (#.c. 723)
and the danger became pressing, he had not the
courage to act up to his engagements, ‘The stout
resistance offered by the Israclite capital for more
than two years (2 Kings xvii 5) drew forth no corres:
ponding effort on the part of the Ethiopic kin
Hoshea was left to his own resources, and in Bi
722 was forced to succumb. His capital was taken
by storm, its inhabitants seized and carried off by
the conqueror, the whole territory absorbed. into that
of Assyria, and the cities occupied by Assyrian
colonists (2 Kings xvi 24). Assyria was brought
fone step nearer to ypt, and it became more than
ever evident that cor act and collision could not be
much longer deferred.
The collision came in wc. 720, In that year
Sargon, the founder of the last and greatest of the
Assyrian dynasties, who had succeeded Shalmaneser
IV. in nc. 72 , having arranged matters in Samaria
and taken Hamath, pressed on against Philistia, the
last inhabited country on the route which led to,
Egypt. Shabak, having made alliance with Hanun,
King of Gaza, marched to his aid. The opposing,
hosts met at Ropeh, the Raphia of the Gre ks, on the
very borders of the desert. Sargon commanded
person on the one side, Shabak and Hanun on the
other. A great battle was fought, which was for a
long time stoutly contested; but the strong forms,
the superior arms, and the better discipline of the
Assyrians, prevailed. Asia proved herself, as she has
generaily done, stronger than Africa; the Egyptians
and Philistines fled away in disorder; Hanun was
made a prisoner; Shabak with difficulty escaped
Negotiations appear to have followed, and a conver
tion to have been drawn up, to which the Eth
and Assyrian monarchs attached their seals. ‘The
SHABATOK SUCCEEDS SHABAK. 327
lump of clay which received the impressions was
found by Sir A. Layard at Nineveh, and is now in
the British Museum.
Shortly afterwards, about 18. 712, Shabak died, and
succeeded in Egypt by his son Shabatok, in
Ethiopia bya certain Tehrak, who appears to have
been his nephew. Tehrak exercised the paramount
authority over the whole realm, but resided at Napata,
while Shabatok held his court at Men
Lower Egypt as Tehrak’s representative.
aggression still continued. In Bc. 711 Sargon took

Ashdod, and threatened an invasion of Egypt, which
Shabatok averted by sending a submissive embassy
with presents.
Six years afterwards Sargon died, and
Sennacherib, mounted the Assyrian throne. At once
south-westernAsia was in a ferment. The Pheenician
and Philistine kings recently subjected by Tiglath-
Pileser and Sargon, broke out in open revolt. Heze-
iah, king of Judah, joined the malcontents. The
id of Egypt was implored, and certain promises of
THE LAND SHADOWING With WINGS.
support and assistance received, in part from Tehrak,,
in part from Shabatok and other native rulers of
nomes and cities. Sennacherib, in B.C. 701, led
army into Syria to suppress the rebellion, reduced,
Pheenicia, received the submission of Ashdod, Ammon,
Moab, and Edom; took Ascalon, Hazor, and Joppa,
and was pro ceding against ‘kron, when for the first
time he encountered an armed force in the field. A
large Egyptian and Ethiopian contingent had at last,
reached Philistia, and, having united itself with the
kronites, stood prepared to give the Assyrians battle
near Eltekeh, ‘The force consisted of chariots, horse-
men, and footmen, and was so numerous that Senna-
cherib callsit “a multitude that no man could numb
Once more, however, Africa had to succumb. Senna-
cherib at Eltekch defeated the combined forces of
ypt and Ethiopia with as much ease and complete-
ness as Sargon at Raphia; the multitudinous host,
‘was entirely routed, and fled from the field, leaving in
the hands of the vietors the greater portion of their
war-chariots and several sons of one of their kings.
After this defeat, it is not surprising that Tehrak
made no further effort. Hezekiah, the last rebel
unsubdued, was left to defend himself as he best
might. The Egyptians retreated to their own borders,
and there awaited attack. It seemed as if the triumph
of Assyria was assured, and as if her yoke must
almost immediately be imposed alike upon Judea,
upon Egypt, and upon the kingdom of Napata; but
an extraordinary catastrophe averted the immediate
danger, and gave to Egypt and Ethiopiaa respite of
thirty-fou ib’s army, of nearly two
SI CHERIL, HEZEKIAH, AND TIRHAKAH. 329
hundred thousand men, was almost totally destroyed in
onenight. “ The angel of the Lord went forth,” says the
contemporary writer, Isaiah, “and smote in the camp
of the Assyrians a hundred and fourscore and five
thousand ; and when they arose early in the morning,
behold, they were all dead corpses” (Isa. xxvii. 36).
Whatever the agency employed in this remarkable
destruction—whether it was wused by a simoon, or a
pestilence, or by a direct visitation of the Almighty,
as differ
history, which show us a sudden ce
attack in this quarter, the kingdom of Judea saved
the Nile left absolutely unobstructed by Asy
the third part of a century. As the destruction hap-
pened on their borders, the Egyptians naturally
enough ascribed it to their own gods, and made a.
boast of it centuries after. Everything marks, as
330. THE LAND SHADOWING WITH WINGS.
fone of the most noticeable facts in history, tnis
annihilation of so great a portion of the army of the
greatest of all the kings of Assyria.
The reign of Tirhakah (Tehrak) during this period
appears to have been glorious. He was regarded by
Judea as its protector, and exercised a certain influ-
tence over all Syria as far as Taurus, Amanus, and the
Euphrates. In Africa, he brought into subjection the
native tribes of the north coast, carrying his arms,
according to some, as far as the Pillars of Hercules.
He is exhibited at Medinet-Abou in the dress of a
warrior, smi ng with a mace ten captive foreign
princes. He erected monuments in the Egyp
style at Thebes, Memphis, and Napata, Of all the
Ethiopian sovercigns of Egypt he was undoubtedly
the greatest; but towards the close of his life re-
verses befell him, which require to be treated of in
another section,
XXL
‘THE FIGHT OVER THE CARCA: ETHIOPIA
ASSVRIA,
Tue miraculous destruction of his army was ac.
cepted by Sennacherib as a warning to desist from all,
further attempts against the independence of Judea,
and from all further efforts to extend his dominions,
towards the south-west. He survived the destruction,
duringa period of seventeen years, and was actively
engaged in a number of wars towards the east, the
north, and the north-west, but abstained carefully
from further contact with either Palestine or F
His son E
BC, 681, and at once, to a certain extent, modified
this policy. He re-established the Assyrian dominion
over Upper Syria, Phoenicia, and even Edom ; but
di ig the first nine years of his reign the memory of
father's disaster caused him to leave Judea and
ypt unattacked. At last, however, in mc. 672,
encouraged by his many military successes, by the
troubled state of Judea under the idolatrous Manasseh,
who “shed innocent blood very much from one end
of Jerusalem to the other” (2 Kings xxi. 16), and by.
the advanced age of Tehrak, which seemed to render
him a less formidable antagonist now than formerly,
332 THE FIGHT OVER THE CaRcASE.
he resumed the designs on Egypt which his father
and grandfather had entertained, swept Manassch
from his path by seizing him and carrying him off a,
prisoner to Babylon, marched his troops from Aphek,
along the coast of Palestine to Raphia, and there
made the dispositions which seemed to him best cal-
culated to effect the conquest of the coveted country.
As Tithakah, aware of his intentions, had collected
all his available force upon his north-east frontier,
about Pelusium and its immediate neighbovr cod, the
Assyrian monarch took the bold resolution of pro-
ceeding southward through the waste tract, known to
the Hebrewsas “the desert of Shur,” in such a way
as to turn the flank of Tirhakah’s army, to reach
Pithom (Heroopolis) and to attack Memphis along,
the line of the Old Canal. ‘The Arab Sheikhs of the
desert were induced to lend him their aid, and faci
tate his march by conveying the water necessary for
his army on the backs of their camels in skins, The.
march was thus made in safety, though the soldiers,
are said to have suffered considerably from fatigue
and thirst, and to have been greatly alarmed by the
sight of numerous serpents.
‘Tehrak, on his part, did all that was possible. On
Iearning Esarhaddon’s change of route, he broke up
from Pelusium, and, by a hasty march across. the
eastern Delta succeeded in interposing his army,
between Memphis and the host of the Assyrians,
which had to follow the line taken by Sir Garnet
Wolseley in 18 4, and encountered the enemy, [r0-
bably, not far from the spot where the British general
completely defeated the troops of Arabi, Here for
TEHRAK DEI TED BY ESARHADDON, 333
the third time Asia and Africa stood arrayed the one
against the other. Assyria brought into the fielda host
of probably not fewer than two hundred thousand met
including a strong chariot force,a powerful cavalry, and
an infantry variously armed and appointed—some with
huge shields and covered by almost complete pano-
plies, others lightly equipped with targe and dart, or
even simply with slings. Egypt opposed to her a
force, probably, even more numerous, but consisting
chiefly of a light-armed infantry, containing a large
proportion of mercenaries whose hearts would not be
in the fight, deficient in cavalry, and apt to trust
mainly to its chariots, In the flat Egyptian plains
lightly accoutred troops fight at a great disadvantage
against those whose equipment is of greater solidityand,
strength ; cavalry are an important arm, since there
is nothing to check the impetus of a charge ; and
personal strength is a most important clement in
determining the result of a conflict. The Assyrians,
were more strongly made than the Egyptians; they,
had probably a better training; they certainly wore
‘more armour, carried larger shields and longer spears,
and were better equipped both for offence and
defence. We have, unfortunately, no description of
the battle; but it is in no way surprising to iearn that,
the Assyrians prevailed; Tehrak’s forces suffered a
complete defeat, were driven from the field in con-
fusion, and hastily dispersed themselves.
‘Memphis was then besieged,taken, and given up to
pillage. The staiw.- of the gods, the gold and silver,
the turquoise and lapis lazuli, the vases, censers, jars,
goblets, amphora, the stores of ivory, ebony, cinna-
334 THE FIGHT ovER THE caRcase.
mon, frankincense, fine linen, crystal, jasper, alabaster,
embroidery, with which the piety of kings had en-
riched the temples—especially the Great Temple of
Phthah—during fifteen or twenty centuries, were
ruthlessly carried off by the conquerors, who destined,
them either for the adornment of the Ninevite shrines
or for their own private advantage. hrak’s. wife
and concubines, together with several of hi children
and numerous of s of his court, left behind in con-
sequence of his hurried flight, fell into the enemy's
hands. Tehrak himself escaped, and fled first to
Thebes, and then to Napata; while the army of
Esarhaddon, following closely on his footsteps, ad-
vanced up the valley of the Nile, scoured the open
country with their cavalry, stormed the smaller towns,
and after a siege of some duration took * populous,
No,” or Thebes, “that w te among the rivers,
that had the waters round about it, whose rampart
was the great deep” (Nahum i . 8). All Egypt was
overrun from the Mediterranean to the First Cataract;,
thousands of prisoners were taken and carried away
captive ; the Assyrian monarch was undisputed master
of the entire land of Mizraim from Migdol to Syene
and from Pelusium to the City of Crocodiles.
Upon conquest followed organization, ‘The great
Assyrian was not content merely to overrun Egypt;
he was bent upon holding it. Acting on the Roman,
principle, “ Divide ct impera,” he broke up the country
into twenty distinct principalities, over each of which,
he placed a governor, while in the capital of each he
put an Assyrian garrison, Of the governors, by far
the greater number were native Egyptians; but in
EGYPT SUBDUED AND DIVIDED UP. 335
one or two instances the command was give to an
syrian. For the most part, the old divisions of the
nomes were kept, but sometimes two or more nomes
were thrown together and united under a single
governor. Neco, an ancestor of the great Pharaoh
who bore the same name (2 Kings xxiii. 29-35), had
Sats, Memphis, and the nomes that lay between them;
Mentu-em-ankh had Thebes and southern Egypt as
as Elephantine. Satisfied with these arrangements,
the conqueror returned to Nineveh, having first, how-

ever, sculptured on the rocks at the mouth of the
Nabr-el-Kelba representation of his person and an
account of his conquests
Egypt lay at the fect of As yria for about three or
four years (0c. 672-660). Then the struggle was
renewed. Tehrak, who had bided his time, learning
that Esarhaddon was seized with a mortal malady,
issued (B.C. 669) from his Ethiopian fastnesses, de-
336 THE FIGHT OVER THE CaRCASE.
scended the valley of the Nile, expelled the governors
whom Esarhaddon had set up, and possessed himself,
of the disputed territory. ‘Thebes received him with
enthusiasm, as one attached to the worship of Ammon ;
and the priests of Phthah opened to him the gates of
Memphis, despite the efforts of Neco and the Assyrian:
he religious sympathy between Ethiopia
ypt was an important factor in the as yet
undecided contest, and helped much to further the
Ethiopic cause. But in war sentimeat can effect but
little. Physical force, on the whole, preva’), unless in,
the rare instances where miracle intervenes, or where
patriotic enthusiasm is exalted to such a pitch as to
strike physical force with impotency
In the conflict that was now raging patriotism had
little part. Ethiopia and Assyria were contending,
partly for military pre-eminence, partly for the prey
that lay between them, inviting a master—the rich
and now weak Egyptian kingdom, ‘Tehrak’s success,
communicated to the Assyrian Court by the dispos-
sessed governors, drew forth almost immediately a
counter effort on the part of Assyria, which did not
intend to relinquish without a struggle the important
addition that Esarhaddon had made to the empirs,
In nc. 668, Asshur-bani-pal, the Sardanapalus of the
Greeks, having succeeded his father Esarhaddon,
put the forces of Assyria once more in motion, and
swooping down upon the unhappy Egypt, succeeded,
in carrying all before him, defeate: Tehrak at Kar-
banit in the Delta, recovered Memphis and Thebes,
forced Tehrak to take refuge at Napata, re-established
in power the twenty petty kings, and restored the,
THE STRUGGLE RENEWED AND CONTINUED. 337
country in all respects to the condition into which it
had been brought four years previously by Esarhaddon,
Egypt thus passed under the Assyrians for the second
time, Ethiopia relinquishing her hold upon the prey
as soon as Assyria firmly grasped it.
Still the matter was not yet settled, the conflict
was not yet ended. ‘The petty kings themscly
began now to coquet with Tehrak, and to invite his
co-operation in an attempt, which they promised they
would make, to throw off the yoke of the Assyrians.
Detected in this intrigue, Neco and two others were
arrested by the Assyrian commandants, loaded with
chains, and sent as_prisonei ineveh But their
atest did not check the movement. On the contrary,
the spirit of revolt spread. ‘The commandants tried
to stop it by measures of extreme severity: they
sacked the great cities of the Delta—Sats, Mendes,
and Tanis or Zoan ; but all was of no avail. Tehrale
once more took the field, descended the Nile valley,
recovered Thebes, and threatened Memphis. Asshur-
bani-pal upon this hastily sent Neco from Nineveh
at the head of an Assyrian army to exert his influence
fon the Assyrian side—which he was content to do,
since the Ninevite monarch had made him chief of
the petty kings, and conferred the principality of
Athribis on his son, Psamatik. Tebrak, in alarm,
retreated from his bold attempt, evacuated Thebes,
and returned to his own dominions, where he shortly,
afterwards died (1c. 667).
Tt might have been expected that the death of the
aged warrior-king would have been the signal for
Ethiopia to withdraw from the struggle so long main-
338 «THE FIGHT OVER THE CaRCASE.
tained, and relinquish gypt to her rival; but the
actual result was the exact contrary. Tehrak was,
succeeded at Napata by his step-son, Rut-Ammon, a
young prince of a bold and w temper. Far
from recoiling from the enterprize which Tehrak had
adjudged hopeless, he threw himself into it with the
utmost ardour. Once more an Ethiopian army de-
scended the Nile valley, occupied Thebes, engaged
and defeated a combined Egyptian and Assyrian
force near Memphis, took the capital, made its gar-
ison prisoners, and brought under subjection the
greater portion of the Delta, Neco, having fallen into,
the hands of the Ethiopians, was cruelly put to death.
His son, Psamatik, saved himself by a timely flight
History now “repeated itself.” In 1.¢. 666 Asshur-
bani-pal made, in person, a second expedition into
xypt, defeated Rut-Ammon upon the frontier, re-
covered Memphis, marched upon Thebes, Rut-Ammon
retiring as he advanced, stormed and sacked the great
city, inflicted wanton injury on its temples, carried
off its treasures, and enslaved its population. The.
triumph of the Assyrian arms was complete. Very
shortly all resistance ¢ id. The subject princes
replaced in their principalities. Asshur-bani-
pal’s sovereignty was universally acknowledged, and
ia, apparently, gave up the contest.
effort was, however, made by the southern
power. On the death of Rut-Ammon, Mi-Ammon-
Nut, probablya son of Tirhakah’s, became king of
Ethiopia, and resolved on a renewal of the war.
yptian disaffection might always be counted on,
whichever of the two great powers held temporary
Last FORTS OF ETHIOPIA 339
possession of the country; and Mi-Ammor
further courted the favour of the Egyptian princes,
priests, and people, by an ostentatious display of zeal
for thei jon, Assyria had allowed the temples
to fall into decay ; the statues of the gods had in
some instances been cast down, the temple re
confiscated, the priests restrained in their conduct of
the religious worship. Mi-Ammon-Nut proclaimed
himself the chosen of Ammon, and the champion of,
the gods of Egypt. On entering each Egyptian town
he was careful to visit its chief temple, to offer sacri
fices and gifts, to honour the images and lead the
in procession, and to pay al due respect to the college
of priests. This prudent policy met with complete
‘As he advanced down the Nile valley, he
was everywhere received with acclamations. “Go.
‘onwardin the peace of thy name,” they shouted, “ go.
onward in the peace of thy name, Dispense life
throughout all the land—that the temples may be.
restored which are hastening to ruin ; that the statues,
of the gods may be set up after their manner ; that
their revenues may be given back to the gods and
goddesses, and the offerings of the dead to the de-
ceased; that the priest may be established in his
place, and all things be fulfilled according to the
Holy Ritual.” In many places where it had been
intended to oppose his advance in arms, the news,
pious acts produced a complete revulsion of
feeling, and “those whose intention it had been to
fight were moved with joy.” No one opposed him
until he had nearly reached the northern capital
Memphis, which was doubtless held in force by the
310 THE FIGHT OVER THE CARCASE.
Assyrians, to whom the princes of Lower Egypt were
still faithful. A battle, accordingly, was fought before
the walls, and in this Mi-Ammon-Nut was victorious;
the Egyptians probably did not fight with much zeal,
and the Assyrians, distrusting their subject allies,
may well have been dispirited, After the victory,
Memphis opened her gates, and soon afterwards the
princes of the Delta thought it best to make their sub-
mission—the Assyrians, we must suppose, retired —Mi
Ammon-Nut’s authority was acknowledged, and the
princes, having transferred their allegiance to him,
were allowed to retain their government:
‘The consequences of this last Ethiopian invasion
of Egypt appear to have been transient. Mi
Ammon-Nut did not live very long to enjoy
conquest, and in Egypt he had no successor. He
was not even recognized by the Egyptians among
their legitimate kings. Egypt at his death reverted
to her previous position of dependence upon Assyria,
feeling herself still too weak to stand alone, and
perhaps not greatly caring, so that she had peace,
which of the two great powers she acknowledged as
her suzerain. She had now (about tic. 650) for above
twenty years been fought over by the two chief
kingdoms of the earth—each of them had traversed
with huge armies, as many as five or six times, the
Nile valley from one extremity to the other; the
cities had been half ruined, harvest after harvest
destroyed, trees cut down, temples rifled, homesteads
burnt, villas plundered. ‘Thebes, the Hundred-gated,
probably for many ages quite the most magnificent
city in the world, had become a by-word for desola-
WRETCHED CONDITION OF GyPr. 34t
tion (Nahum ii. 8, 9); Memphis, Heliopolis, Tanis,
Sais, Mendes, Bubastis, Heracleopolis, Hermopolis,
Crocodilopoiis, had been taken and retaken repeatedly
the old buildings and monuments had been allowed
to fall into decay ; no king had been firmly enough,
established on his throne to undertake the erection
of any but insignificant new ones. Egypt was “fallen,
fallen, fallen—fallen from her high estate;” an apathy,
not unlike the stillness of death, brooded over he
literature was silent, art extinct ; hope of recovery
can scarcely have lingered in many bosoms /
events proved, the vital spark was not actually fled;
but the keenest observer would scarcely have ventured
to predict, at any time between nc. 750 and Cc. 650,
such a re = 650
and BC. 530.
XXIL
THE CORPSE COMES TO LIFE AGATN—PSAMATIK I.
AND IIS SON NECO.
WHEN a country has sunk so gradually, so per
sistently, and for so longa series of yearsas Egypt had
now b n sinking, if there is a reviva it must almost
necessarily come from without. ‘The corpse cannot
¢ without assistance—the expiring patient cannot
cure himself, All the vital powers being sapped, all
the energies having departed, the Valley of the
Shadow of Death having been entered, nothing can
arrest dissolution but some foreign stock, some blood.
not yet vitiated, some “ saviour” sent by Divine pro-
vidence from outside the nation (Isa. xix. 20), to
recall the expiring | to revivify the paralyzed
frame, to infuse fresh energy into it, and to make it
once more live, breathe, act, think, assert itself, Yet
the saviour must not be altogether from without. He
must not be a conqueror, for conquest necessarily
weakens and depresses; he must not be teo remote
in blood, or he will lack the power fully to understand
and sympathize with the nation which he is to restore,
and without true understanding and true sympathy
he can effect nothing; he must not be a stranger to,
FOREIGN ORIGIN OF Ps MATIR L343
the nation’s recent history,or he will make mistakes,
that will be irremediable. What is wanted is a scion
of a foreign stock, connected by marriage and other-
wise with the nation that he is to regenerate, and
well acquainted with its circumstances, character,
position, history, virtues, weaknesses. No entirely
new man can answer to these requirements ; he must
be found, if he is to be found at all, among the prin-
cipal men of the time, whose lot has for some con.
siderable period been cast in with the State which is
to be renovated.
ypt, at the time of which we are speaking,
exactly this position was occupied by Psan
of Neco. He was, according to all appearance, of
Libyan origin; his stock was nev name and his
father’s name are unheard of hitherto in E
history; etymologically, they are non-Egyptian
Psamatik has a nor ee, He was
probably of the same family as “ Inarus the Libyan,”
whose father was a Psamatik. He belonged thus to
a Libyan stock, which had, however, been crossed,
more than once, with the blood of the Egyptians.
‘The family was one of those Libyan families which,
had long been domiciled at Sats,and had intermartied,
with the older Saites, who were predominantly Egyp-
tian. He had also for ewent
important unit in the Egyptian political system,
having shared the vicisitudes of his father’s fortunes
from B.C. 672 to 0.c.667, and having then been placed
at the head of one of the many principalities into
which Egypt was divided. In the same, or the next,
year he seems to have succeeded his father: and he
344 THE CORPSE COMES TO LIFE AGAIN.
hhad reigned at Sats for sixteen or seventeen years
before he felt himself called upon to take any step
that was at all abnormal, or attempt in any way to,
change his position,
Familiar with the polities and institutions of Egypt,
yet, as a semi-Libyan, devoid of Egyptian prejudices.
z Say
and full of the ambition which naturally inspires

young princes of a vigorous stock, Psamatik had at
once the desire to shake off the yoke of Assyria, and
Egypt under his own sway, and also a willing-
ness to adopt any means, however new and strange,
by which such a result might be accomplished. He
PSAMATIK AND GYGES OF LYDIA, 345
had probably long watched for a favourable moment
at which to give his ambition vent, and found it at
last in the circumstances that ushered in the second half
of the seventh century. Assyria was, about Bc. 651,
brought intoa position of great difficulty, by the revolt
of Babylon in alliance with Elam, and was thus quite
unable to exercise a strict surveillance over the more
istant parts of the Empire. The garrison by which
she held Egypt had probably been weakened by the
withdrawalof troops for the defence of Assyria Proper;
at any rate, it could not be relieved or strengthened
under the existing circumstances. At the same time
a power had grown up in Asia Minor, which was
jealous of Assyria, having lately been made to tremble
for its independence. Gyges of Lydia had, in a
moment of difficulty, been induced to acknowledge
himself Assyria’s subject; but he had emerged trium-
phant from the perils surrounding him, had reasserted
his independent authority, and was anxious that the
power of Assyria should be, as much as_possible,
diminished. Psamatik must have been aware of this.
Casting his eyes around the political horizon in
search of any ally at once able and willing to lend
he fixed upon Lydia as likely to behis best
auxiliary, and dispatched an embass Minor.
Gyges received his application favourably, and sent
im a strong Asiatic contingent, chiefly composed of
Tonians and Carians. Both races were at this time
warlike, and wore armour of much greater weight and
strength than any which the Egyptians were accus-
tomed to carry. It was in reliance, mainly, on these
forcigners, that Psamatik ventured to proclaim hin
340 THS CORPSE COMES TO LIFE AGAIN.
self King of the Two Countries,” and to throw out a
gage of defiance at once to his Assyrian suzerain and,
to his nineteen fellow-princes.
‘The gage was not taken up by Assyria, Immersed
in her own difficulties, threatened in three quarters,
on the south, on the south-east, and on the east by
Babylonia, by Elam, and by Media, she had enough
to do at home in guarding her own frontiers, and,
seeking to keep under her immediate neighbours, and,
was therefore in no condition to engage in distant
expeditions, or even to care very much what became
of a remote and troublesome dependency. Thus
Assyria made no sign. But the petty princes took,
arms at once. To them the matter was one of life
or death, they must either crush the usurper or be
themselves swept out of existence. So they gathered,
together in full force. Pakrur from Pisabtu, and Petu-
bastes from Tanis, and Sheshonk from Busiris, and
Tafnekht from Prosopitis, and Bek-en-nefi from Ath-
ribis, and Nakh-he from Heracleopolis, and Pimai from
Mendes, and Lamentu from Hermopolis, and Mentu-
em-ankh from Thebes, and other princes from other
cities, met and formed their several contingents intoa
le army, and stood at bay near Momemphis, the
modern Menouf, in the western Delta, on the borders of
the Libyan Desert, Here a great battle was fought,
which was for some time doubtful ; but the valour of
the Greco-Carians,
ment, prevailed.
his adversaries were defeated and dispersed ; follow-
ing up his first success, he proceeded to attack
after city, forcing all to submit, and determined that
PSAMATIK SOLE KING OF EGYPT. 347
hhe would nowhere tolerate even the shadow of a rival
Disintegration had been the curse of Egypt for the
space of above a century; Psamatik put an end to it.
No more princes of Bubastis, or of Tanis, or of Sais,
or of Mendes, or of Heracleopolis, or of Thebes! No
more eikosiarchies, dodecarchies, or heptarchies even!
Monarchy pure, the absolute rule of one and one only
sovereign over the whole of Egypt, from the cataracts
of Syenc to the shores of the Mediterranean, and from
Pelusium and Migdol to Momemphis and Marea, was
established, and henceforth continued, as long as
Egyptian rule endured. ‘The lesson had been learnt
at a tremendous cost, but it had now at last been
thoroughly learnt, that only in unity is there strength
—that the separate sticks of the faggot are impotent,
to resist the external force which the collective bundle
might without difficulty have defied and scorned,
Psamatik had gained the object of his ambition—
sovereignty over all Egypt; he had now to consider
howit might best be kept. And first, as that which
is won by the sword must be kept by the sword, he
made arrangements with the troops sent to his aid by
Gyges, that they should take permanent service under
his banner, and form the most important element in
his standing army. His native troops were quartered
at Elephantine, in the extreme south, and in Marea
and Daphne, at the two extremities of the Delta
towards the west and east. The new accession to his
military strength he stationed at no great distance
from the capital, settling them in permanent camps on
either side of the Pelusiac branch of the Nile, near
the city of Bubastis, We are told that this exaltation
348 THE CORPSE COMES TO LIFE AGAIN,
of the new corps to the honourable position of keep=
ing watch upon the capital, greatly offended the
native troops,
igypt and seck service with the Ethiopians.
facts have probably been exaggerated, for Et
certainly does not gain, or Egypt lose, in strength,
ther at or after this period.
Psamatik, further, for the better securing of his
throne against pretenders, thought it prudent to con=
tract a marriage with the des ndant of a royal stock
held in honour by many of his subjects. The princess,
Shepenput, was the daughter ofa Piankhi, who claimed
descent from the unfortunate Bek-en-ranf, the king.
burnt alive by Shabak, and who had also probably
some royal Ethiopian blood in his veins. By hi
nuptials with this princess, Psamatik assured to his
crown the legitimacy which it had hitherto lacked.
Uniting henceforth in his own person the rights of
the twenty-fourth and twenty-fifth dynasties, those of
the Saites and those of the Ethiopians, he became
the one and only legal king, and no competitor could
possibly arise with a title to sovereignty higher or
better than his own.
Being now personally sccure, he could turn his at-
tention to the restoration and elevation of the nation
ality of which he had taken it upon him to assume
the direction. He could cast his eyes over the un-
happy Egypt —depressed, down-trodden, well
trampled to death—and give his best consideration to
the question what was to be done to restore her to
her ancient greatness, There she lay before his eyes
in a deplorable state of misery and degradation. All
REVIVAL OP EGYPT U DER PSAMATIK. 349
the great cities, her glory and her boast in former
ays, had suffered more or less in the incessant wars;
Memphis had been besieged and pillaged half a dozen
times ; Thebes had been sacked and burnt twice;
from Syene to Pelusium there was not a town which
had not been injured in one or other of the many
wasions. The canals and roads, carefully repaired
by Shabak, had since his decease met with entire
neglect ; the cultivable lands had been devastated,
and the whole population decimated periodically.
Out of the ruins of the old Egypt, Psamatik had to
raise up a new Egypt. He had to revivify the dead
corpse, and put a fresh life into the stiff and motion-
less limbs. With great energy and determination he
set himself to accomplish the task. Applying jm
self, first of all,to the restoration of what was decayed
and ruined, he re-established the canals and the roads,
‘encouraged agriculture, favoured the development of
the population. ‘The ruined towns were gradually
repaired and rebuilt, and vast efforts made every-
where to restore, and even to enlarge and beautify
the sacred edifices. At Memphis, Psamatik built the
great southern portal which gave completeness to the
ancient temple of the god Phthah, and also constructed
a grand court for the residence of the Apis-Bulls,
surrounded by a colonnace, against the piers of which
stood colossal figures of Osiris, from eighteen to
twenty feet in height. At Thebes he re-erected the
portions of the temple of Karak, which had been
thrown down by the Assyrians ; at Sais, Mendes,
Heliopolis, and Phila he undertook extensive works.
‘The entire valley of the Nile became little more than
one huge workshop, where stone-cutters and masons,
bricklayers and carpenters, laboured incessantly.
Under the liberal encouragement of the king and of
his chief nobles, the arts recovered themselves and
began to flourish anew. The engraving and painting,
of the hieroglyphics were resumed with success, and
carried out with a minuteness and accuracy that pro-
vokes the admiration of the beholder. Bas-reliefs of
extreme beauty and elaboration characterize the
period. There rests upon some of them “a gentle and
almost feminine tenderness, which has impressed upon
the imitations of living creatures. the
incredible delicacy both of conception and
Statues and statuettes of merit were at the same time
produced in abundance. The “ Saitie art,” as that of
the revival under the Psamatiks has been called, is
characterized by an extreme neatness of manipula-
ion in the drawings and lines, the fineness of which
often reminds us of the performances of a seal-en-
graver, by grace, softness, tend ss, and clegance.
It is not the broad, but somew at realistic style of
the Memphitie period, much less the highly ima
tive and vigorous style of the Ramesside kings; but
it is.a style which has quiet merits of its own, sweet
and pure, full of refinement and delicacy.
Egypt was thus rendered flourishing at home; her
magnificent temples and other edifices put off their
look of neglect ; her cities were once more busy seats
of industry and traffic; her fields teemed with rich
harvests; her population increased; her whole aspect
changed. But the circumstances of the time led
Psamatik to attempt something more. His employ-
ENCOURAGEMENT OF FOREIGNERS. 35%
ment of Greek ercenaries naturally led
him on into an i ito a
-d and consideration for them quite unknown to
n contradiction to ordinary
ypt was the China of the
uch as
possib.e aloof from foreigners, a nd looked upon them

with a Foreign vessels were, until the time
of Psat forbidden to enter any of the Nile
mouths, or to touch at an Egyptian port. Psamatik
saw that the new circumstances required an extensive
change. The mercenaries, if they were to be content
with their position, must be allowed to communicate
freely with the cities and countries from which they
came, and intercourse between Greece and Egypt
must be encouraged rather than forbidden, Accord-
ingly the Greeks were invited to make settlements in
the Delta, and Naucratis, favourably situated on the
Canopic branch of the Nile, was specially assigned to
them as a residence. Most of the more enterprizing
among the commercial states of the time took advan-
tage of the opening, and Miletus, Phocwa, Rhodes,
Samos, Chios, Mytilene, Halicarnassus, and AE
established factories at the locality specified, built
temples there to the Greek gods, and sent out a body,
of colonists. A considerable trade grew up between
Egypt and Greece, The Egyptians of the higher
classes e pecially appreciated the flavour and quality.
of the sek wines, which were consequently im-
ported to the country in large quantities. Greek
pottery and Greek glyptic art also attracted a certain
amount of favour. On her side Egypt exported corn,
alum, muslin and linen fabrics, and the excellent
paper which she made from the Cyperus Papyrus.
‘The trade thus established was carried on mainly,
if not wholly,in Greek bottoms, the Egyptians having
1a distaste to the sea, and regarding commerce with no,
great favour. Nevertheless, the life and stir which,
foreign commerce introduced among them, the
familiarity with strange customs and manners, engen-
dered by daily intercourse with the Greeks, the acquisi-
tion (on the part of some) of the Greek language, the
sight of Greek modes of worship,of Greek painting
and Greek sculpture, the insight into Greck habits of
VARIOUS CORRUPTI! INFLUENCES. 45,
thought, which could not but follow, produced no.
inconsiderable effect upon the national character of
the Egyptians, shaking them out of their accustomed,
groove, and awakenjng curiosity and inquiry. ‘The
effect was scarcely beneficial. Egyptian national life
had been eminently conservative and unchanging,
‘The introduction of novelty in ten thousand shapes
unsettled and disturbed it, The old beliefs were
shaken, and a multitude of superstitions rushed in,
The corruptions introduced by the Greeks were more
easy of adoption and imitation than the sterling points
of their character, their intelligence, their unwearied
energy, their love of truth. Egypt was awakened to
a new life by the novel circumstances of the Psamatik
period; but it was a fitful life, unquiet, unnatural,
feverish. The character of the men lost in dignity
and strength by the discontinuance of military training
consequent upon the substitution for a native army of
an army of mercenaries. The position of the wom
sank through the adoption of those ideas concerning
them which their contact with orientals had engrained
into the minds of the Asiatic Greeks. The national
spirit of the people was sapped by the concentration
of the royal favour on a race of foreigners whose
manners and customs were abhorrent to them, and
whom they regarded with envy and dislike. If some
improvement is to be seen on the surface of Egyptian
life under the Psamatiks, some greater activity and
‘enterprise, some increased intellectual stir, some
proved methods in art, these ameliorations scarcely
compensate for the indications of decline which lie
deeper, and which in the sequel determined the actual
fate of the nation.
354 THE CORPSE COMES TO LIFE AGAIN
The later years of the reign of Psamat
coincident with a time of extreme trouble and confi
sion in Asia, in the course of which the Assy
Monarchy came to an end, and_ south-western
‘was partitioned between the Medes and the Baby-
lonians. A tempting field was laid open for an
ambitious prince, who might well have dreamt of
jan or even Mesopotamian conquest, and of re-
calling the old glories of Seti, Thothmes, and
Amenhotep. Psamatik did go so
attack upon Philistia, but met with so little
that he was induced to restrain any grander aspirations,
which he may have cherished, and to leav the A:
monarchs to settle Asiatic affairs as it pleased them.
Ashdod, we are told, resisted the Egyptian arms for
twenty-nine years ; and though it fell at last, the pros-
pect of half-a-dozen such sieges was not encouraging.
Psamatik, moreover, was an old man by the time that
the Assyrian Empire fell to pieces, and we can under-
stand his shrinking from a distant and dangerous ex-
pedition, He left the field open for his son, Neco,
having in no way committed him, but having secured
for him a ready entrance into Asia by his conquest of.
the Philistine fortress.
Neco, the son of Psamatik I, from the moment that
he ascended the throne, resolved to make the bold.
stroke for empire from which his father had held back.
Regarding his mercenary army as a sufficient land,
force, he concentrated his energies on the enlargement
and improvement of his navy, which was weak in
numbers and of antiquated construction. Naval archi-
tecture had récently made great strides, first by the
NECO BUILDS TWO FLEETS. 355
inven veness of the Phoenicians, who introduced the
biremi and then by the skill of the Greeks, who, im-
proving on the hint furnished them, constructed the
trireme. Neco, by the help of Greek artificers, built
two fleets, both composed of triremes, one in the ports
which opened on the Red Sea, the other in those upon’
the Mediterranean, He then, with the object of uniting
the two fl ets into one, when occasion should require,

made an attempt to re-open the canal between the
Nile and the Red Sea, which had been originally con
structed by Seti I. and Ramesses I but had been
allowed to fall into repair. The Nile mud and the
desert sand had combined to silt it up. Neco com-
menced excavations on a large scale, following the line
of the old cutting, but greatly widening it,so that
triremes might meet in it and pass each other, without
shipping their oars. After a time, however, he felt
compelled to desist, without effecting his purpose,
‘owing to an extraordinary mortality among the
labourers. According to Herodotus, 120,000 of them,
perished. At any rate, the suffering and loss of life,
probably by epidemics, was such as induced him to
‘relinquish his project, and to turn his thoughts toward
gaining his end in another way.
zht not Nature have herself established a water
communication between the two seas by which Egypt
was washed? It was well known that the Mediter-
ranean and the Red Sea both communicated with an
open ocean, and it was the universal teaching of the
Greek geographers, that the ocean flowed round the
whole earth, Neco determined to try whether Africa
was not circumnavigable. Manning some ships with
Phornician mariners, as the boldest and most experi
enced, accustomed to brave the terrors of the Atlantic
outside the Pillars of Hercules, he dispatched them
from a port on the Red Sea, with orders to sail south-
wards, keeping the coast of Africa on their right, and
see if they could not return to Egypt by way of the
Mediterranean. The enterprise succeeded. ‘The ships,
under the skilful guidance of the Pheenicians, antici-
pated the feat of Vasco di Gama—rounded the Cape of
Storms, and returned by way of the Atlantic, the Straits
of Gibraltar, and the Mediterranean to the land from
which they had set oat. But they did not reach Egypt
till the third year. The success obtained was thus of
no practical value, so far as the Pharaoh’s warlike
projects were concerned, He had to relinquish the
NECO DEFEATS yostan at Mec 57
idea of uniting his two fleets in one, owing to the
length of the way and the dangers of the navigation.
He had, however, no mind to relinquish his warlike
projects. Syria, Pheenicia, and Palestine were still in
an unsettled state, the yoke of Assyria being broker
and that of Babylon not yet firmly fixed on them.
Josiah was taking advantage of the opportunity to
extend his authority over Samaria, Phoenicia was
hesitating whether to submit to Nabopolassar or to
assert her freedom. ‘The East generally was in a fer-
ment. Neco in ts ¢. 608, determined to make his ven-
ture. At the head of a large army, consisting mainly
of his mercenaries, he took the coast route into Syria,
supported by his Mediterrancan fleet along the shore,
and proceeding through the low tracts of Philistia
ind Sharon, prepared to eross the ridge of hills which
shuts in on the south the great plain of Esdraéton5,
but here he found his passage barred by an army.
Josiah, either because he feared that, if Neco were
Successful, his own position would be imperiled, or be-
cause he had entered into engagements with Nabopo-
lassar, had resolved to oppose the further progress of
the Egyptian army, and had occupied a strong position
near Megiddo,on the southern verge of the plain. In,
vain did Neco seck to persuade him to retire, and leave
the passage free. Josiah was obstinate, and a battle
became unavoidable. As was to be expected, the
Jewish army suffered complete defeat ; Neco swept it
from his path, and pursued his way, while Josiah,
mortally wounded,was conveyed in his reserve chariot
to Jerusalem, The triumphant Pharaoh pushed forward
into Syria and carried all before him as far as Carche-
358 THE CORPSE COMES 10 LIFE AGAIN.
mish on the Euphrates, ‘The whole country submitted
tohim, After a campaign which lasted three month:
Neco returned in triumph to his own land, carrying,
with him Jehoahaz, the second son of Josiah, as a
prisoner, and leaving Jehoiakim, the eldest son, as,
tributary monarch, at Jerusalem,
For three years Egypt enjoyed the sense of triumph,
and felt herself once more a conquering power, capa-
ble of contending on equal terms with any state or
kingdom that the world contained. But then Nemes
swooped down on her. In 1c. 603 Nabopolassar of
Babylon woke up to a consciousness of his loss of pres-
tige, and determined on an effort to retrieve it. Too
old to undertake a distant campaign in person, he
placed his son, Nebuchadnezzar, at the head of his
troops, and sent him into Syria to recover the lost
provinces. Neco met him on the Euphrates. A great
battle was fought at Carchemish between the forces of
Egypt and Babylon, in which the former suffered a
terrible defeat. We have no historical account of it,
but may gratefully accept, instead, the prophetic de-
scription of Jeremiah :
“Onder ye the buekler and the shield, and draw ye near to batle
Haaness the horses; and get up, ye horsemen, and stand forth with
you helmets
Furbish the spears, and put om the brigandine.
Wherefore have Tscen them dismayed, and turned away backward?
And their mighty ones ate eaten down, and fled apace, and Took not
behind them 5
For fea is ound about, sith Jehovah.
Let not the swift flee away, nor the mighty men exape
‘They shall stumble and fall toward the north by the river Euphrates,
Who is this that cometh up asa Nood [lke the Nile, whose waters are
‘moved asthe rivers?
NECO DI ATED AT CARCHEMISH. 350
‘Cosh and Pht, that handle the eld, and Lad that handles and bends
bow.
th: day of the Lord, the Lord of hosts a day of vengeance,
that he may smite his foes
And the sword shall devour, and be made satiate and drunk with Bocas
he Lord the Lord of Hosts hath a sariicein the north country,
bythe river Euphrates.
Go wp into Gilead, aon take balm, © virgin daughter of Egyp
ny maticines to thee no cure shall come.
‘The nations have hea of thy shame, and thy cry hath ill the lant
For the mighty man bas stumbled against the mighty, and both are
fallen together.
The disaster was utter, complete, not to be remedied
—the only thing to be done was to “ fly apace,” to put
the desert and the Nile between the vanquished and the
victors, and to deprecate the conqueror’s anger by sub-
mission, Neco gave up the contest, evacuated Syria and
Palestine, and hastily sought the shelter of his own land,
whither Nebuchadnezzar would probably have speedily.
followed him, had not news arrived of his father's, Na-
bopolassar’s, death. To secure the succession, he had to
return, as quickly as he could, to Babylon, and to allow
the Egyptian monarch, at any rs te, a breathing space.
Thus ended the dream of the recovery of an Asiatic
mpire, which Psamatik may have cherished, and of
which Neco attempted the realization. ‘The defeat of
Carchemish shattered the unsubstantial fabric into
atoms, and gave a death-blow to hopes which no
Pharaoh ever entertained afterwards,
+ Jeremiah lv. 3-12.
XXIIL
THE LATER SAITE KINGS. AMATIK TL, APRIES,
AND AMAS
‘Tire Satie revival in art and architecture, in com=
mercial and g¢ jeral_prospe y, which Psamatik the
First inaugurated, continued under his successors. To
the short reign of Psamatik II. belong a considerable
aumber of inscriptions, some good bas-reliefs at
Abydos and Philx, and a large number of statues.
One of these, in the collection of the Vatican, is
remarkable for its beauty. Apries erected numerous
stele, and at least one pair of obelisks, wherewith
he adorned the Temple of Neith at Sats. Ama:
afforded great encouragement to art and architecture,
He added a court of entrance to the above temple,
with propyliea of unusual dimensions, lorned the
dromos conducting to it with numerous andro-
sphinxes, erected colossal statues within the temple
precincts, and conveyed thither from lephantine a
monolithic shrine or chamber of extraor y dimen:
sions. Traces of his architectural activity are also
found at Memphis, Thebes, Abydos, Bubastis, and
Thmuis or Leontopolis. Statuary flourished during
js reign, Even portrait-painting was attempted;
and Amasis sent a likeness of himself, painted on
TROUBLES IN SYRIA AND PALESTINE. 361
sa present to the people of Cyrene, Tt was
ined by the Egyptians of a century later that
the reign of Amasiswas the most prosperous time which
Egypt had ever seen, the land being more productive,
the cities more numerous, and the entire people more
happy than either previously or subsequently. Amasis,
certainly gave a fresh impulse to commerce, since he
held freq
of Asia Mi swith the settlers at Cyrene,
and gave vileges to the trading com-
munity of Naucratis.
in a military point of view, there was to some
extent a recovery from the disaster ofCarchemish. The
Babylonian empire was not sufficiently established
or consolidated at the accession of Nebuchadnezzar
for that monarch to form at once extensive schemes
of conquest, There was much to be done in Elam,
in Asia Minor, in Phoenicia, and in Palestine, before
his hands could be fre to occupy themselves in the
subjugation of more distant regions. Within three
years after the battle of Carchemish Judea threw off
‘the yoke of Babylon, and a few years later Phaeni
pe rieiine haemo of ie ee
nezzar had not much difficulty in erushing the Jewish
re resisted his arms with extreme
obstinacy, and it was not till thirteen years after the
revolt took place that Phaenicia was re-conquered.
Even then the position of Judea was insecure : she
was known to be thoroughly disaffected, and only
waiting an opportunity to rebel a second time. Thus
Nebuchadnezzar was fully occupied with troubles
within his own dominions, and left Egypt undis-
362 THE LATER SAITE KD
turbed to repair her losses, and recover her military
prestige, as she best might.
‘eco outlived his defeat about eight or nine
during which he nursed his strength, and abstained
from all warlike enterprises. His son, Psamatik IT
who succeeded him BC. 596, made an attack on the
Ethiopians, and seems to have penetrated deep into
Nubia, where a monument was set up by two of
his generals, Apollonius, a Greek, and Amasis, an
Egyptian, which may still be seen on the rocks of
Abu-Simbel, and is the earliest known Greek in-
scription. The following is a fac-simile, only reduced
BASIAEOSEA@ONTOSES RAR PANTINANYAPATIXS
YAVTAEPPAYANToISVN VAMMATIXOITOIOEOKASS
EMAbON BAGONABKEPKI0$ KAT VT ED@LVIs0PoTA Mos
ANIBAMopACs0$0 BXENOTASI TOA ICVETIOg ABAMASIS
TRPASERAAMEAPLONAMIOIBI4EKAINE/EQCOVAAMO.
Apries, the son of Neco, brought this war to an end
the first year of his r ign (B.C. 590) by the arms of
fone of his generals ; and, finding that Nebuchadnezzar.
was still unable to reduce Pheenicia to subjection,
he ventured, in hc. 588, to conclude a tr
Zedekiah, king of Judah, and to promise
ance, if he would join him against the Babylonians,
‘This Zedekiah consented to do, and the war followed
which terminated in the capture and destruction of
Jerusalem, and the transfer of the Jewish people to
Babylon
It is uncertain what exact part Apries took in tl
war. We know that he called out the full force of
the empire, and marched into Palestine, with the
APRIES OFFENDS NEBUCHADNEZZAR. 363
object of relieving Zedekiah, as soon as he knew that
that monarch’s safety was threatened. We know
that he marched towards Jerusalem, and took up
such a threatening attitude that Nebuchadnezzar at.
one time actually raised the siege (Jer. xxvii. 5).
We do not know what followed. Whether Apries, on
finding that the whole Chaldean force had broken
up from before Jerusalem and was marching against
himself, took fright at the danger which he had
affronted, and made a sudden inglorious retreat ; or
whether he boldly met the Babylonian host and con-
tended with them in a pitched battle, wherein he was
worsted, and from which he was forced to fly into his
own land, is uncertain. Josephus positively declares
that he took the braver and more honourable
course: the silence of Scripture as to any battle is,
thought to imply that he showed the white feather,
In either case, the result was the same. Egypt re-
coiled before Babylon; Palestine was evacuated ; and
Zedekiah was left to himself, In nc. 386 Jerusalem
fell; Zedekiah was made a prisoner and cruelly
deprived of sight; the Temple and city were burnt,
and the bulk of the people carried into captivity.
Babylon rounded off her dominion in this quarter by
the absorption of the last state upon her south-
western border that had maintained the shadow of in-
dependence : and the two great powers of these parts,
hitherto prevented from coming into contact by the
intervention of a sort of political “ buffer,” became
coaterminous, and were thus brought into a position
in which it was not possible that a collision should
for any considerable time be avoided.
304 THE LATER SAITE KINGS.
Recognizing the certainty of the impending col
sion, Aprics sought to strengthen his power for
resistance by attaching to his own empire the
Phaenician towns of the Syrian coast, whose adhesion
to his side would secure him, at any rate, the mari
time superiority. He made an expedition against
Tyre and Sidon both by land and sea, defeated the
combined fleet of Pheenicia and Cyprus in a great
‘engagement, besieged Sidon, and after a time com-
pelled it to surrender. He then endeavoured further
to strengthen himself on the land side by bringing
under subjection the Greek city of Cyrene, which had
now become a flourishing community; but here his
good fortune forsook him} the Cyrenaan forces de-
feated the army which he sent against them, with
great slaughter ; and the event brought Apries into
disfavour with his subjects, who imagined that he
had, of malice prepense, sent his troops into the ja
of destruction. According to Herodotus, the
mediate result was a revolt, which cost Apries his
throne, and, within a short time, his life; but the
centire narrative of Herodotus is in the hi
mprobable, and some recent discoveries suggest a
ferent termination to the reign of this re-
markable ki
an expedition into Egypt. According to all accounts
this date fell into the lifetime of Ap Amasis,
however, the successor of Apries, appears to have
been Nebuchadnezzar’s direct antagonist, and to have
fed him in the field, while Apries remained in
the palace at Sais. The two were joint kings from
NEBUCHADN, {R OVERRUNS EGYPT. 365
B.C. $71 to KC. 565. Nebuchadnezzar, at first,
neglected Sai ceeded, by way of Heliopolis
and Bubastis (1 t the old capitals,
Memphis and Thebes. Having taken these, and“ de-
stroyed the idols and made the images to cease,” he
advanced up the Nile valley to Elephantine, which he
took, and then endeavoured to penetrate into Ni
A check, however, was inflicted on his army by Nes-
Hor, the Governor of the South, whereupon he gave
up his idea of Nubian conq Returning down
the valley, he completed that ravage of Egypt which,
is described by Jeremiah and Ezekiel. It is probable
that in Bc. 565, three years after his first invasion, he
took Sais and put the aged Apries to death
he allowed still to reign, but only as a tributary
and thus Egypt became “a base kingdom” (
xxix. 14), “the basest of the kingdoms” (ibid. verse
15), if its former exaltation were taken into account.
[he “base kingdom” was, however, materially,
The sense of security from
a great encouragement to private
\dustry and commercial enterprise. The discon-
‘nuances of lavish expenditure on military expedi-
tions improved the state finances, and enabled those
at the head of the government to employ the money,
that would otherwise have been wasted, in repro-
ductive undertakings. The agricultural system of
igypt was never better organized or better managed
than under Amasis, Nature seemed to conspire with
man to make the time one of joy and delight, for
‘the inundation was scarcely ever before so regularly
* Josepus, Ante Jude x9, 97+
306 ‘THE LATER SAITE KIN
abundant, nor were the crops ever before so plentiful
The “ twenty thousand cities,” which Herodotus assigns
to the time, may be a myth; but, beyond all doubt,
the tradition which told of them was based upon the,
fact of a period of unexampled prosperity. Amasis's
law, that each Egyptian should appear once each,
year before the governor of his canton, and show the,
means by which he was getting an honest
may have done something tor ards mal ing industry
general; but his example, his active habits, and his,
encouragement of art and architecture, probably did,
more. His architectural works must have given con-
stant employment to large numbers of persons as,
quarrymen, boatmen, bricklayers, plasterers, masons,
carpenters, and master builders ; his patro ce of art
not only gave direct occupation to a multitude of
artists, but set a fashion to the more wealthy among
his subjects by which the demand for objects of
was multiplied a hundredfold. Sculptors and painters,
had a happy time under a king who was always
building temples, erecting colossi, or sending statues
or paintings of himself as presents to foreign states
or foreign shrines.
The external aspect of Egypt under the reign of
is is thus as bright and flourishing as that which
ever wore at any former time ; but, as M. Lenor-
mant observes, this apparent prosperity di but ill
conceal the decay of patriotism and the decline of all,
the institutions of the nation. ‘The kings of the Saite
dynasty had thought to re-vivify Egypt, and
little new blood into the old monarchy founded by
Menes, by allowing the great stream of liberal ideas,
PROSPERITY UNDER AMASIS, UNREAL. 367
whereof Greece had already made herself the pro-
pagator, to expand itself in her midst. Without
knowing it, they had by these means introduced
on the banks of the Nile a new element of decline
Constructed exclusively for continuance, for pre-
serving its own traditions in defiance of the flight of
centuries, the civilization of Egypt could only main-
tain itself by rema From the day on
which it found itself in contact with the spirit of
progress, personified in the Grecian civilization and
in the Greek race, it was under the absolute necessity
of perishing. It could neither launch itself upon a
wholly new path, one which was the direct negation
of its own genius, nor continue on without change
its own 3 Thus, as soon as it began to be
penetrated influence, it fell at once into
complete dissolution, and sank intoa state of decrepi-
tude, that already resembled death. We shall see,
in the next section, how suddenly and completely the
yptian power collapsed when the moment of trial
came, and how little support the surface prosperity
which marked the reign of Amasis was able to render
to the Empire in the hour of need and distress.
XXIV.
* THE PERSIAN conQu ST.
Ture subjection of Egypt to Babylon, which com-
menced in KC. 565, was of that light and almost
nominal character, which a nation that is not very,
sensitive, or very jealous of its honour, does not care
to shake off. A small tribute was probably paid by,
the subject state to her suzerain, but otherwise the
yoke was unfelt. There was no interference with the
internal government, or the religion of the Egyptians;
no appointment of Babylonian satraps, or tax-col-
lectors ; not even, so far as appears, any demands for
contingents of troops. Thus, although Nebuchad-
nezzar died within seven years of his conquest of
Egypt, and though a time of disturbance and con-
fusion followed his death, four kings occupying the
Babylonian throne within little more than six years,
two of whom met with a viol it end, yet Amasis
seems to have continued quiescent and contented, in
the enjoyment of a life somewhat more merry and
amusing than that of most monarchs, without making
any effort to throw off the Babylonian supremacy or
reassert the independence of his country. It was
not til his self-indulgent apathy was intruded upon
from without, and he received an appeal from a
RISE OF THE PERSIAN POWER. 369
foreign nation, to which he was compelled to return
an answer, that he looked the situation in the face,
and came to the conclusion that he might declare
himself independent without much risk. He had at
this time patiently borne his subject position for the
space of above twenty years, though he might easily
have reasserted himself at the end of seven.
The circumstances under which thé appeal was
‘made were the following. A new power had suddenly
risen up in Asia. About nc. 558, ten years after
ebuchadnezzar's subjection of Egypt, Cyrus, son of
Cambyses, the tributary monarch of Persia under the
Medes, assumed an independent position and began a
career of conquest. Having made himself master of
ge portion of the country of Elam, he assumed
the title of “King of Ansan,” and engaged in a long
war with Astyages (Istivegu), his former suzera
which terminated (in hc. 549) inhhis taking the Median
monarch prisoner and succeeding to his dominions.
zed through Asia that a new
peril had arisen. The Medes,a mountain people of
great physical strength and remarkable bravery, had
for about a century been regarded as the most power-
ful people of Western Asia. They had now been
overthrown and conquered by a still more powerful
mountain race. ‘That race had at its head an ener-
getic and enterprising prince, who was in the full
vigour of youth, and fired evidently with a high
ambition. His position was naturally felt as a direct
menace by the neighbouring states of Babylon and
Lydia, whose royal families were interconnected.
Crassus of Lydia was the first to take alarm and to
370 THE PERSTAN CONQUEST.
devise measures for his own security. He formed the
conception of a grand league between the principal
powers whom the rise of Persia threatened, for mutual
defence against the common enemy ; and, in further-
ance of this design, sent, in B.C. 547, an embassy to
Egypt, and another to Babylon, proposing a close,
alliance between the three countries. Amasis had to,
determine whether he would maintain his subjection
to Babylon and refuse the offer; or, by accepting it,
declare himself a wholly independent monarch. He
learnt by the embassy, if he did not know it before,
that Nabonadius, the Babylonian monarch, was in
Aifficulties, and could not resent his action, He might
probably think that, under the circumstances, Na-
bonadius would regard his joining the league as a
friendly, rather than an unfriendly, proceeding. At
any rate, the balance of advantage seemed to him on
the side of complying with the request of Creesu
Croesus was lord of Asia Minor, and it was only by
his permission that the Ionian and Ca
on whom the throne of the Pharaohs now mainly
depended, could be recruited and maintained at their
proper strength. It would not do to offend so im-
portant a personage ; and accordingly Amasis came
into the proposed alliance, and pledged himself to
send assistance to whichever of his two confederates
should be first attacked. Conversely, they no doubt
pledged themselves to him but the remote position
of Egypt rendered it extremely improbable that they
would be called upon to redeem their pledges.
Nor was even Amasis called upon actually to re-
deem the pledges which he had given, In BC. 546,
ALLIANCE OP EGYPT, BABYLON, D LYDIA. 37%
Croesus, without summoning any contingents from
his allies, precipitated the war with Persia by crossing
the river Halys, and invading Cappadocia, which was
included in the dominions of Cyrus. Having s
fered a severe defeat at Pteria, a Cappadocian city,
he returned to his capital and hastily sent messengers
to Egypt andelsewhere, begging for immediate assist-
ance. What steps Amasis took upon this, or intended
to take, is uncertain; but it must have been before any.
troops could have be n dispatched, that news reached
ypt which rendered it useless to send out an ex-
us had scarcely reached his capit
when he found himself attacked by Cyrus in his turn;
his army suffered a second defeat in the plain before
Sardis; the city was besieged, stormed, and taken
thin fourteen days. Crassus fell, alive, into the
hands of his enemy, and was kindly treated; but his
Kingdom had passed away. It was evidently too late
for Amasis to attempt to send him succour. The
tripartite alliance had, by the force of circumstances,
come to an end, and Amasis was an independent
jonarch, no longer bound by any engagements.
Shortly afterwards, in nc. 538, the conquering
monarchy of Persia absorbed another victim. Na-
bonadius was attacked, Babylon taken, and the
Chaldean monarchy, which had lasted nearly two
thousand years, brought to an end. The contest had
been prolonged, and in the course of it some dis-
integration of the empire had taken place. Phanicia
hhad asserted her independence; and Cyprus, which
was to a large extent Phoenician, had followed the
example of the mother-country. Under these cir-
372 THE PERSIAN CONQUEST.
cumstances, Amasis thought he saw an opportu
of gaining some cheap laurels, and accordingly made
a naval expedition against the unfortunate islanders,
who were taken unawares and forced to becomeh
jes. Tt was unwise of the Egyptian monarch
nd Cyrus that he had still an open enemy un-
J, one who had entered into a league against
him ten years previously,
prevent him from reaping the full b
conquests. We may be sure that the Pe
arch noted and resented the interference with terri-
tories which he had some right to consider his own ;,
whether he took any steps to revenge himself is,
doubtful, According to some, he required Amasis,
to send him one of his daughters as a concubine, an
insult which the Egyptian king escaped by finesse
while he appeared to submit to it.
It can only have been on account of the other wars
which pressed upon him and occupied him during his
remaining years, that Cyrus did not march in person
against Amasis. First, the conquest of the nations
between the Caspian and the Indian Ocean detained
him ; and after this, a danger showed itself on his
north-castern frontier which required all .
and in meeting which he lost his life. ‘The indepen-
dent tribes beyond the Oxus and the Jaxartes have
through all history been an annoyance and a peril to
the power which rules over the Iranian plateau, and,
it was in repelling an attack in this quarter that Cyrus
fel . Amasis, perhaps, congratulated himself on the
defeat and death of the great warrior king; but
Egypt would, perhaps, have suffered less had the
CAMBYSES PREPARES TO INVADE EGYPT. 373
invasion, which was sure to come, been conducted by
the noble, magnanimous, and merciful Cyrus, th
she actually endured at the hands of the impulsive,
tyrannical, and half-mad Cambyses.
The first step taken by Cambyses, who succeeded
his father Cyrus in nc. 529, was to reduce Phaenicia
under his power. ‘The support of a flect was of
immense importance to an army about to attack
Egypt, both for the purpose of conveying water and
stores, and of giving command over the mouths of the
Nile, so that the great cities, Pelusium, Tanis,
Bubastis, Memphis, might be blockaded both by land
and water. Persia, up to the accession of Cambyses,
had (so to speak) no fleet. Cambyses, by threatening
the Pheenician cities on the land side, succeeded in
nducing them to submit to him ; he then, with their
aid, detached Cyprus from her Egyptian masters, and
‘obtained the further assistance of a Cypriote squadron,
Some Greek ships also gave their services, and the
result was that he had the entire command of the
sea, and was able to hold possession of all the Nile
mouths, and to bring his flect up the river to the very
ls of Memphis.
Still, therewere difficulties to overcome in respect
of the passage of an army. Egypt is separated from
Palestine by a considerable tract of waterless deserts
and it was necessary to convey by sea, or on the
backs of camels, all the water required for the troops,
for the camp-followers, and for the baggage animals.
A numerous camel corps was indispensable for the
conveyance, and the Persians, though employing
camels on their expeditions, are not likely to have
374 THE PERSIAN CONQU
possessed any very considerable number of these
beasts. At any rate, it was extre
find a fresh and abundant supply of camels on the
spot, together with abundant water-skins. TI
fortune befell the Persian monarch, who was
‘make an alliance with the sheikh of the most power-
ful Bedouin tribe of the region, who undertook the
ire responsibility of the water supply. He thus
crossed the desert without disaster or suffering, and
brought his entire force intact to the Pelusiac branch
of the Nile, near the point where it poured its waters
into the Mediterranean Sea.
‘At this point he found a mixed Egyptian and
Greco-Carian army prepared to resist his further
progress. Amasis had died about six months pre-
ly, leaving his throne to his son, Psamatik the
itd. This young prince, notwithstanding
experience, had taken all the measures that were
possible to protect his kingdom from the invader.
He had gathered together his Greck and Carian
mercenaries, and having also levied a large native
army, had posted the entire force not far from
Pelusium, in an advantageous position, On
Greeks and Carians he could thoroughly depend,
though they had lately seen but little ser
native levies, on the contrary, were of scarcely any
value; they were jealous of the mercenaries, who
had superseded them as the ordinary land force, and
they had had little practice in warfare for the last
forty years. At no time, probably, would an Egyptian
army composed of native troops have been a match
for such soldiers as Cambyses brought with him into
PSAMATIK III. DEFEATED AT PELUSIUM. 375
Egypt — Persians, Medes, Hyrcanians, Mardians,
Greeks—trained in the school of Cyrus, inured to
arms, and confident of victory. But the native
soldiery of the time of Psamatik III. fell far below
the average Egyptian type; it had little patriotism,
it had no experience, it was smarting under a si
of injury and ill-treatment at the hands of the
kings. “The engagement between the two armies at
Pelusium was thus not so much a battle as a carnage.
No doubt the mercenaries made a stout resistance,
but they were vastly outnumbered, and were not much
better troops than their adversaries. The Egyptians
must have been slaughtered like sheep. According
to Ctesias, fifty thousand of them fell, whereas the
entire loss on the Persian side was only six thousand.
After a short struggle, the troops of Psamatik fled,
and in a little time the retreat became a complete
ves did not stop till they reached
Memphis, where they shut themselves up within the
walls.
Itis the lot of Egypt to have its fate decided by a
single battle. The country offers no strong positions,
that are strategically more defensible than others.
‘The whole Delta is one alluvial flat, with no elevation
that has not been raised by man. The valley of the
Nile is so wide as to furnish everywhere an ample
plain, wherein the largest armies may contend without
having their movements cramped or hindered, An
army that takes to the hills on either side of the
valley is not worth following : it is self-destroyed,
since it can find no sustenance and no water. Thus
the sole question, when a foreign host invades Egypt,
is this: Can it, or can it not, defeat the full force of
Egypt in an open battle? If it gains one battle, there
is no reason why it should not gain fifty; and
so evident, and so well known, that on Egyp\
one defeat has almost always been accepted as de-
cisive of the military supremacy. A beaten army
may, of course, protract its resistance behind walls,
and honour, fame, patriotism, may seem sometimes to
require such a line of conduct ; but, unless there is a
reasonable expectation of relief arriving from without,
protracted resistance is useless, and, from a military
point of view, indefensible. Defeated commanders
have not, however, always seen this, or, secing it, they
have allowed prudence to be overpowered by other
considerations. Psamatik, like many another ruler of
‘gypt, though defeated in the field, determined to
defend his capital to the best of his power. He threw
himself, with the remnant of his beaten army, into
Memphis, and there stood at bay, awaiting the further
attack of his adversa
It was not long before the Persian army drew up
under the walls, and invested the city by land, while
the fleet blockaded the river. A single Greek vessel,
having received orders to summon the defenders of
the place to surrender it, had the boldness to enter
the town, whereupon it was set upon by the Exyptians,
captured, and destroyed. Contrarily to the law of
nations, which protects ambassadors and their escort,
the crew was torn limb from limb, and an outrage
thus committed which Cambyses was justified in
punishing with extreme severity. Upon the fall of
the city, which followed soon after its investment, the
FALL OF MEMPHIS. 377
offended monarch avenged the crime which had been
committed by publicly executing two thousand of the
principal citizens, including (it is said) a son of the
fallen king. The king himself was at first spared, and,
might perhaps have been allowed to rule Egypt as a
tributary monarch, had he not been detected in a
design to rebel and renew the war. For this offence
he, too, was condemned to death, and executed by
Cambyses’ order.
The defeat had been foretold by the prophet E zekiel,
who had said -—
Woe worth the day ! For the day i ne
Even the day ofthe Lord is nea, a day of eloads
Tt shall be the time of the heathen,
Anda sword sh ‘ome upon Egypt, and anguish shall be in
hiopia
‘slain shall fll in Egypt; and they shall take away hex
‘And he foundations shall be broken down.
Ethiopia and Pht and ll the mingled people, and Chub,
‘And the childeen of the lad that is i league, shall ll with them by
the sword,
1 wil puta fear inthe land of Egy
‘And Twill make Pathros desolate
And will seta fie in Zoan, and will exccate judgments a Now « ..
Sin (Pelsium] shal be in great anguish,
‘And No stall be broken up, and. Noph shall have adversaries in the
daytime.
‘The young men of Aven an of P-beseth shall fll by the sword:
And these cities shall go into captivity.
[At Tehaplinehes also the day shall withdraw itself,
‘When I shall break there the yokes uf Egypt
And the pride of her power shall ccae."*
Accordingto Herodotus, Cambyses was not content.
with the above-mentioned severities, which were per-
kil 29. 3-1
haps justifiable under the circumstances, but proceeded
further to exercise his rights as conqueror in a most,
violent and tyrannical way. Hetore from its tomb the
mummy of the late king, Amasis, and subjected it to,
the grossest indignities. He stabbed in the thigh an
Apis-Bull, recently inaugurated at the capital with
joyful ceremonies, suspecting that the occasion was
feigned, and that the rejoicings were really over the
ill-success of expeditions carried out by his orders
against the oasis of Ammon, and against Ethiopia.
He exhumed numerous mummies for the mere pur-
pose of examining them. He entered the grand,
temple of Phthah at Memphis, and made sport of the
image. He burnt the statues of the Cabeiri, which he
found in another temple. He scourged the priests of
Apis, and massacred in the streets those E
who were keeping the festival. Altogether,
was, if the informants of Herodotus are to be believed,
to pour contempt and contumely on the Egyptian,
religion, and to insult the religious feelings of the
entire people.
On the other hand, we learn from a contemporary
inscription, that Cambyses so far conformed to Egyp-
tian usages as to take a “throne-name,” after the
pattern of the ancient Pharaohs; that he cleared the
temple of Neith at Sais of the foreigners who had,
taken possession of it ; that he entrusted the care of
the temple to an Egyptian officer of high standing;
and that he was actually himself initiated into the
mysteries of the goddess. Perhaps we ought not to
be greatly surprised at these ions. Cam-
BGYPT UNDER CAMBYSES AND DARIUS. 379
under excitement, tooka pleasure in showing his ab-
horrence of Egyptian superstitions. But he was not
always under excitement—he enjoyed lucid interv
during which he was actuated by the spirit of an ad-
ministrator and a statesman. Having in many ways
greatly exasperated the Egyptians against his rule,
he thought it prudent,ere he quitted the country, to
soothe the feelings which he had so deeply wounded,
and conciliate the priest-class, to which he had given
such dire offence. Hence his politic concessions to
public feeling at Sats, his initiation into the mysteries
of Neith, his assumption of a throne-name, and his
restoration of the temple of Sais to religious uses.
And the policy of conciliation, which he thus inaugu-
rated, was continued by his successor, Darius, Darius,
built, or repaired, the temple of Ammon, in the oasis,
of El Khargeh, and made many acknowledgments,
of the deities of Egypt; when an Apis-Bull died
early in his reign, he offered a reward of a hundred
talents for the discovery ofa new Apis; and he pro-
posed to adorn the temple of Ammon at Thebes with,
a new obelisk. At the same his administra-
which he entrusted to a certain Ary
he re-opened the canal between the Nile and the Red
Sea, for the encouragement of Egyptian commerce ;,
he kept up the numbers of the 5 in his
arrangement of the satrapies, he placed no greater
burthen on Egypt than it was well able to bear; and
he seems to have honoured Egypt by his occasional
presence. He failed, however, to allay the discontent,
and even hatred, which the outrages of Cambyses had
aroused ; they still remained indelibly impressed on
nind; the Persian rule was detested5
and in sullen atisfaction the entire nation awaited
an opportunity of recla ing its independence and
flinging off the accursed yoke.
‘THREE DESPERATE REVOLTS,
‘Tue first revolt of the Egyptians against their con-
querors, appears to have been provoked by the news
of the battle of Marathon. Egypt heard, in Bc. 490,
that the arms of the oppressor, as she ever deter-
mined to consider Darius, had met with a reverse in
European Greece, where 200,000 Medes and Persians
had been completely defeated by 20,000 Athenians
and Platawans. Darius, it was understood, had taken
greatly to heart this reverse, and was bent on aveng-
ing it. The strength of the n_ Empire was
about to be employed towards the West, and an
excellent opportunity seemed to have arisen for a
defection on the South. Accordingly Egypt, after
making secret preparations for three years, in 1.C. 487,
broke out in open revolt. She probably overpowered
and massacred thé Persian garrison in Memphis,
which is said to have numbered 120.000 men, and,
proclaiming herself independent, set up a native
sovereign.
‘The Egyptian monumentssuggest that this monarch,
bore the foreign-sounding name of Khabash. He
fortified the coast of Egypt against attempts which
might be made upon it by the Persian fleet, and
382 THR DESPERATE REVOLTS.
doubtless prepared himself also to resist an invasion
by land. But he was quite unable to do anything
effectual. Though Darius died in the year after the
revolt, B.C. 486, yet its suppression was immediately
undertaken by his son and successor, Xerxes, who,
invaded Egypt in the next year, easily crushed all
resistance, and placed the province under a severer
rule than any that it had previously experienced.
Achaemenes, his brother, was made satrap.
‘Twenty-five years of tranquillity followed, during
which the Egyptians were submissive subjects of tie
Persian crown, and even showed remarkable courage
and skill in the Persian military expeditions. Egypt
furnished as many as two hundred triremes to the
fleet which was brought against Greece by Xerxes,
and the squadron particularly distinguished itself in,
the sea-fights off Artemisium, where they actually
captured five Grecian vessels with the Mar-
donius, moreover, set so high a value on the marines
who fought on board the Egyptian ships, that he re-
tained them as land-troops when the Persian flect
returned to Asia after Salam
No further defection took place during the reign of
Xerxes; but in Bc. 460, after the throne had been
occupied for about five years by Xerxes’ son, Arta-
xerxes, a second rebellion broke out, which led to a
long and terrible struggle. A certain Inarus, who
bore rule over some of the African tribes on the
western border of Egypt, and who may have been a
descendant of the Psamatiks, headed the insurrection,
and in conjunction with an Egyptian, named Amyr-
tueus, suddenly attacked the Persian garrison stationed
REVOLT OF INARUS. 383
in Egypt, the ordinary strength of which was 120000
A great battle was fought at Papremis, in the
Delta, wherein the Persians were completely defeated,
and their leader, Achamenes, perished by the hand
of Inarus himself, Memphis, however, the capital,
still resisted, and the struggle thus remained doubtful.
Inarus and Amyrtaus implored the assistance of
Athens, which had the most powerful navy of the
time, and could lend most important aid by taking
possession of the river. Athens, which was under the i
fluence of the farsighted Pericles, cheerfully responded
tothe call, and sent two hundred triremes, manned by
at least forty thousand men, to assist the rebels, and to,
do as much injury as possible to the Persians. On sai
ing up the Nile, the Athenian fleet found a Persian
squadron already moored in the Nile waters, but it,
swept this obstacle from its path without any difficulty.
Memphis was then blockaded both by land and water;
the city was taken, and only the citadel, Leuco
Teichos,or “ the White Fortress,” held out. A formal
siege of the citadel was commenced, and the allies lay
before it for months, but without result. Meanwhile,
Artaxerxes was not idle, Having collected an army
‘of 300,000 men, he gave the command of it to Mega-
byzus, one of his best generals, and sent him to Egypt
against the rebels. Megabyzus marched upon Mem-
phis, defeated the Egyptians and theiralliesin a great
battle under the walls of the town, relieved the
Persian garrison which held the citadel, and recovered
possession of the place. The Athenians retreated to
the tract called Prosopitis, a sort of island in the
Delta, surrounded by two of the branch streams of
384 THREE DES RATE REVOLTS.
the Nile, which they held with their ships. Here
Megabyzus besieged them without success for eighteen
months; but at last he bethought himself of a strata-
gem like that whereby Cyrus is said to have captured
Babylon, and adapted it to his purpose. Having
blocked the course of one of the branch streams, and.
diverted its waters into a new channel, he laid bare
the river-bed, captured the triremes that were stuck
fast in the soft ooze, marched his men into the island,
and overwhelmed the unhappy Greeks by sheer force
of numbers. A few only escaped, and made their way
yrene. The entire flect of two hundred vessels
fell into the hands of the conqueror ; and fifty others,
sent as a reinforcement, having soon afterwards
centered the river, were attacked unawares and defeated,
with the loss of more than half their number. Inarus,
the Libyan monarch, became a fugitive, but was
betrayed by some of his followers, surrendered, and
crucified. Amyrtwus, who had been recognized as
king of Egypt during the six years that the struggle
lasted, took refuge in the Nile marshes, where he
dragged out a miserable existence for another term of
six years. ians offered no further resi
ance; and Egypt became once more a Persian satrapy
B.C 455)
It was at about this time that Herodotus, the
carliest Greek historian, the Father of History, as he
has been called, visited Egypt in pursuance of his
plan of gathering information for his great work. He
was a young man, probably not far from thirty years
of age (for he was born between the dates of the
battles of Marathon and Thermopyl). He travelled
‘LT OF NEPHER‘TIS, 383
through the land as far as I sphantine, viewing with
is obser eyes the wonders with which the
Story ot Egypt” has been so much occupied ; and
he described them with the enthusiasm that we have
occasionally noted. He saw the battle-field on which
Inarus had just been defeated—the ground strewn
with the skulls and otherbones of the slain ; he made
his longest stay at Memphis, then at the acme of its
greatness ; he visited the quarries on the east of the
Nile whence thestone had been dug for the pyramids,
and he gazed upon the great monuments themselves,
on the opposite side of the stream. We have seen,
that he visited Lake Meeris,and examined the famous,
Labyrinth, which he thought even more wonderful
than the pyramids themselves. Finally, he sailed
away for Tyre, and Egypt was again closed to travel-
lers from Greece.
A second period of tranquillity followed, which
covered the space of about half a century. Nothing
is known of Egypt during this interval; and it might
have been thought that she had grown contented with,
hher lot, and that her aspirations after independence
were over. For fifty years she had made no sign.
Even the troubled time between the death of Arta-
xerxes I. and the accession of Darius II. had not
tempted her to strikea blow for freedom. But still
she was, in reality, irreconcilable. She was biding
her time, and preparing herself for a last desperate
effort.
In BC. 406 or 40s, towards the close of the reign of
Darius Nothus, the third rebellion of Egypt against
Persia broke out. A native of Mendes, by name
386 r DEsPE eATE REVOLTS,
Nepheritis, or moze properly Nefaa-rut, raised the
banner of independence, and commenced a war, which
snust have lasted for some years, but which terminated
tn the expulsion of the Persian garrison, and the re-
establishment of the throne of the Pharaohs. It is
unfortunate that no ancient authority gives any
account of the struggle, We only know that, after a
time, the power of Nefaa-rut was established; that
Persia left him in undisturbed possession of Egypt,
and that he reigned quietly for the space of six years,
‘employing himself in the repair and restoration of the
of Ammon at Karnak. Nothing that can be
called a revival, or renaissance, distinguished his refg
and we must view his success rather as the result of
Persian weakness, than of his own energy. His revolt,
however, inaugurated a period of independence,
which lasted about sixty years, and which threw over
the last years of the doomed monarchy a gleam of
sunshine, that fora brief space recalled the glories of
zarlier and happier ages.
XXV1.
A LAST Gi LEAM OF SUNSHINE—NECTANEBO 1.
‘A TROUBLED time followed the reign of Nefaa-rut.
‘The Greek mercenary soldiery,on whom the monarchs,
depended, were fickle in their temperament, and easily
took offence, if their inclinations were in any way
thwarted. Their displeasure commonly led to the
dethronement of the king who had provoked it ; and,
we have thus, at this period of the history, five reigns
in twenty-five years. No monarch had time to dis-
tinguish himselfby a re-organization of the kingdom,
or even by undertaking buildings on a large scale—
each was forced to live from hand to mouth, meeting,
_ as he best might the immediate difficulties of his
position, without providing for a future, which he
might never live to see. Fear of re-conquest was also
perpetual; and the monarchs had therefore constantly,
to be courting alliances with foreign states, and sub-
jecting themselves thereby to risks which it might
have been more prudent to have avoided.
With the accession of Nectanebo I. (Nekht-Horheb),
about B.C. 385, an improvement in the state of affairs
set in, Nekht-hor-heb was a vigorous prince, who,
held the mercenaries well under control, and, having,
raised a considerable Egyptian army, set himself to
388 THE LAST GLEAM OF SUNSHINE,
place Egypt in such a state of defence, that she might
confidently rely on her own strength, and be under no
of entangling herself with foreign alliances, He
strongly fortified all the seven mouths of the Nile,
guarding each by two forts,one on cither side of each
stream, and establishing a connection between each
pair of forts bya bridge. At Pelusium, where the
danger of hostile attack was always the greatest, he
multiplied his precautions, guarding it on the side of
the east by a deep ditch, and carefully obstructing all
the approaches to the town, whether by land or sea,
by forts and dykes and embankments, and contri-
vances for laying the neighbouring territory under
water. No doubt these precautions were taken with
special reference to an expected attack on the part of,
Persia, which was preparing, about 1c. 376, to makea
great effort to bring Egypt once more into subjection.
“The expected attack came in the next year. Hav-
ing obtained the services of the Athenian general,
Iphicrates, and hired Greek mercenaries to the number
of twenty thousand, Artaxerxes Mnemon, in Ike. 375,
sent a huge armament against Egypt, consisting of,
20,000 men, 500 ships of war, and a countless num=
ber of other vessels carrying stores and_ provisions.
Pharnabazus commanded the Persian soldiery, Iphi-
es the mercenaries. Having rendezvoused at
Acre in the spring of the year, they set out early in
the summer, and proceeded in a leisurely manner
through Philistia and the desert, the fleet accompany-
ing them along the coast. This rcute brought them
to Pelusium, which they found so strongly fortified
able to force the defences,
NECPANEDO ATTACKED BY PHARNALAZUS. 389
and felt it necessary to make a complete cha
their plan of attack. Putting to sea with a portion of
the fleet, and with troops to the number of three
thousand, and sailing northward till they could no
longer be seen from the shore, they then, probably at
nightfall, changed their course, and steering south-
west, made for the Mendesian mouth of the Nile,
which was only guarded by the twin forts with thei
connecting bridge. Here they landed without oppo-
jon, and proceeded to reconnoitre the forts. The
garrison gave them battle outside the walls, but was
defeated with great loss; and the forts themselves
were taken, The remainder of the force conveyed by
the ships, was then landed without difficulty; and the
invaders, having the complete mastery of one of the
Nile mouths, had it in their power to direct their
attack to any point that might seem to them at once
most important and most vulnerable,
Under these circumstances the Athenian general,
Iphicrates, strongly recommended a dash at Memphis
‘The main strength of the Egyptian army had been
concentrated at Pelusium. Strong detachments held
the other mouths of the Nile. Memphis, he felt sure,
must be denuded of troops, and could probably be
carried by a coupde main; but the advice of the rapid
Greek was little to the taste of the slow-moving and
cautious Persian. Pharnabazus declined to sanction
any rash enterprise—he would proceed according to
tie rules of art. He had the advantage of numbers—
why was he to throw it away? No, a thousand times
no. He would wait till his army was once more
collected together, and would then march on Mem-
390.“ THE LAST GLEAM OF SUNSHINE.
phis, without exposing himself or his troops to any
danger. The city would be sure to fall,and the object
of the expedition would be accomplished. In vain
did Iphicrates offer to run the whole risk himself—to,
take no troops withhim besides his own mercena
and attack the city with them, As the Greek grew
more hot and reckless, the Persian became more cool
and wary. What might not be behind this foothardi-
a t it not be possible that the Greek was
interests, and designing, if he got
possession of Memphis, to set himself up as king of
Egypt? There was no knowing what his intention
might be; and at any rate it was safest to wait the
arrival of the troops. So Pharnabazus once more
coolly declined his subordinate’s offer
Nectanebo, on his side, having thrown a strong
garrison into Memphis, moved his army across the
Delta from the Pelusiac to the Mendesian branch of
the Nile, and having concentrated it in the neighbour-
hood of the captured forts, proceeded to operate
against the invaders. His troops harassed the enemy.
in a number of petty engagements, and in the course
of time inflicted on them considerable loss. In this way
midsummer was reached—the Etesian winds began to
blow, and the Nile to rise. Gradually the aboundi
stream spread itself over the broad Delta ; roads were
overflowed, river-courses obliterated ; the season for
military operations was clearly past. There was no
possible course but to return to Asia, Iphicrates and
Pharnabazus took their departure amid mutual re-
criminations, each accusing the other of having caused,
the expedition to be a complete failure.
GLORIES 01 NECTANELO'S LATER YEARS 301
‘The repulse of this huge host was felt by the
ptians almost as the repulse of the host of Xerxes
vas felt by the Greeks, Nectanebo was looked upon
asa hero and a demigod ; his throne was assured ; it
was felt that he had redeemed all the failures of the
past, and had restored Egypt to the full possession
of all her ancient dignity and glory. Nectanebo con-
tinued to rule over “the Two Lands” for nine years
Ionger in uninterrupted peace, honour, and_pros-
perity. During this time he applied himself, with
considerable success, to the revival of Egyptian art
and architecture. At Thebes he made additions to
the great temple of Karnak, restored the temple of,
Khonsu, and adorned with reliefs a shrine originally
erected by Ramesses XI. At Memphis he was ex-
traordinarily active: he built a small temple in the
neighbourhood of the Serapeum, set up inscriptions in
the Apis repository in henour of the sacred bulls,
_erected two small obelisks in black gran
his name inscribed more than once in the qu:
Toora. Traces of his activity are also found at Edfu,
at Abydos, at Bubastis, at Rosetta in the Delta, and
at Tel-el-Maskoutah. The art of his time is said to
have all the elegance of that produced under the
twenty sixth (Psamatik) dynasty, but to have been
somewhat more florid. The two black obelisks abov
mentioned, which are now in the British Museum,
show the admirable finish which prevailed at this
period. The sarcophagus which Nectanebo prepared
for himself, which adorns the same collection, is also
of great beauty.
We cannot be surprised to find that Nectanebo
gg 7 GLEAM OP SUNSHINE.
was worshipped after his death as a divine being. A
priesthood was constituted in his honour, which
handed down his cult to later times, and bore witness
to the impression made on the Egyptian mind by his
his successes,
XXVIL
‘THE LIGHT GOES OUT IN DARKNESS
N TANEHO'S successors had neither his foresight
nor his energy. Te-h the Tachos or Teos of the
Greeks, who followed him on the throne in 1c. 366,
to provoke the Persi is by fo-
ting the war of the satraps against Ar
Mnemon, and, having obtained the services of Age:
latis and Chabrias, ev n ventured to invade Phoenicia
and attempt its reduction, His own hold upon Egypt
was, however, far too weak to justify so bold a pro:
ceeding. Scarcely had he reached Syria, when revolt
broke out behind him. ‘to whom he had
entrusted the direction of affairs dur is his absence,
proved unfaithful, and incited his son, Nekht-nebi,
to become a candidate for the crown, and to take up
arms against his father. The young pr
duced by the offers made him, and Egypt bec
plunged in a civil war, But for the
duct of Agesilatis, which were conspicuously dis-
played, Tacho would have yielded to despair and
have given up the contest. In two decisive battles
the Spartan general completely defeated the army of
the rebels, which far outnumbered that of Tacho, and
replaced the king on his tottering thr.
304 THE LIGHT GOES OUT IN DARKNESS.
However, it was not long before the party of the
rebels recovered from their defeats. Agesilaiis either
joined them, or withdrew from the struggle, and re-
moving to Cyre died there at an advanced age.
Tacho, deserted by his followers, quitted Egypt and
fled to Sidon, whence he made his way across the
desert to the court of the Great King. Ochus, who
had by this time succeeded Mnemon, received him
favourably, and professed an intention of embracing
his cause; but nothing came of this expression of
good-will. Tacho lived a considerable time at the
court of Ochus, without any steps being taken to
restore him to his former position, At last a dysentery
carried him off, and legitimated the position of the
usurper who had driven him into exile
he end now drew nigh. Nekht-nebf, whom the
Greeks called Nectancbo IL, having after a time
established himself firmly upon the throne, and got
rid of pretenders, resumed the ambitious policy of,
his predecessor, and entered into an alliance with
the people of Sidon and their neighbours, who were
in revolt against Persia. He had the excuse tha
Ochus, some time previously, had sent an expedition
inst Egypt, which he had repulsed by the assist-
ance of two Greck generals, Diophantus of Athens
and Lamius of Sparta. But this expedition was a
thing of the past ; it had inflicted no injury on Egypt,
and it demanded no revenge. Nekht-nebf was in_no
way called upon to join the rebel confederacy, which
(in 1. 346) raised the flag of revolt from Persia, and
sought to enrol in its ranks as many allies as possible:
But he rashly gave in his name, and sent to Sidon.
GREAT EXPEDITION OF OcHUS. 305
as his contingent towards the army that was being,
raised, four thousand of his Greck mercenaries, under
the command of Mentor of Rhodes. With their
aid, Tennes, the Sidonian king, completely defeated
the troops which Ochus had sent against him, and
drove the Persians out of Phoenicia.
The success, however, which was thus gained by the
rebels only exasperated the Persian king, and made him
resolve all the more on a desperate effort. ‘The time
had gone by, he felt, for committing wars to satraps,
or sending out generals, with a few thousand troops, to,
put down this or that troublesome chieftain, The
conjuncture called for measures of no ordinary cha-
acter. The Great King must conduct an expedition
in person. Every sort of preparation must be made ;,
arms and provisions and stores of all kinds must be
accumulated; the best troops must be collected from
all parts of the empire; a sufficient fleet must be
manned; and such an armament must go forth
under the royal banner as would crush all opposition.
Ochus succeeded in gathering together from the
nations under his direct rule 300,000 foot, 30,000 horse,
300 triremes, and s00 transports or provision-ships.
He then directed his efforts towards obtaining efficient
assistance from the Grecks. Though refused aid by
Athens and Sparta, he succeeded in obtaining a
thousand Theban heavy-armed under Lacrates, three
thousand Argives under Nicostratus, and six thousand
olians, Ionians, and Dorians from the Greek cities,
of Asia Minor. ‘The assistance thus secured was
numerically small, amounting to no more than ten
thousand men—not a thirticth part of his native force ;
but it formed, together with the Greek mercenaries
from Egypt—who went over to him afterwards—the
force on which he placed his chief reliance, and to which
the ultimate success of his expedition was mainly due.
The overwhelming strength of the armament which
Ochus had brought wth him into Syria alarmed the
chiefs of the rebel confederacy. Tennes, especially,
the Sidonian monarch, despaired of a successful
resistance, and made uphis mind that his only chance
of safety lay in his appeasing the anger of Ochus by.
of his confederates and followers. He
s designs to Mentor of Rhodes, the com-
mander of the Greek mercenaries furnished by Egypt,
and found him quite ready to come into his plans.
‘The two in conjunction betrayed Sidon into the
hands of Persia, by the admission of a detachment,
within the walls; after which the defence became,
impracticable. ‘The Sidonians, having experienced
the unrelenting temper and sanguinary spirit of the
Persian king, who had transfixed with javelins si
hundred of their principal citizens, came to the des-
perate resolution of setting fire to their houses, and,
so destroying themselves with their town, One is glad,
to learn that the cowardly traitor, Tennes, who had.
brought about these terrible calamities, did not derive
any profit from them, but was executed by the come
mand of Ochus, as soon as Sidon had fallen,
‘The reduction of Sidon was followed closely by the
invasion of Egypt. Ochus, besides his 330,000 Asiatics,
had now a force of 14,000 Greeks, the mercenaries
under Mentor having joined him, Marshalling his,
army in four divisions, he proceeded to the attack.
ARRANGEMENT OF THE PERSIAN FORCES. 397
The first, second, and third divisions contained, each
of them, a contingent of Greeks and a contingent of
Asiaties, commanded respectively by a Greek and a
Persian leader. The Grecks of the first division, con-
sisting mainly of Boeotians, were under the orders
of Lacrates, a Theban of enormous strength, who
regarded himself as a second Hercules, and adopted
the traditional costume of that hero,a lion’s skin and
aclub. His Persian colleague was Rhosaces, satrap
of Ionia and Lydia, who claimed descent from one
of “the Seven” that put down the conspiracy of the
Magi. In the second division, where the Argive
mercenaries served, the Greek leader was Nicostratus,
the Persian Aristazanes, a court usher, and one of the
most trusted friends of the king. Mentor and the
eunuch Bagoas, Ochus’s chief minister in his later
years, were at the head of the third division, Mentor
‘commanding his own mercenaries, and Bagoas the
Greeks whom Ochus had levied in his own dom
together with a large body of Asiatics. The king
himself was sole commander of the fourth division, as
well as commander-in-chief of the entire host. Nekht-
nebf, on his side, was only able to oppose to this vast
array an army less than one-third of the size. He
had enrolled as many as sixty thousand of the
Egyptian warrior class, and had the services of twenty
thousand Greek mercenaries, and of about the same
number of Libyan troops.
Pelusium, as usual, was the first point of attack.
Nekht-nebf had taken advantage of the long delay of
Ochus in Syria to see that the defences of Egypt
were in good order ; he had made preparations for
resistance at all the seven mouths of the Nile, and
had guarded Pelusium with especial care. Ochus, as,
he had expected, advanéed along the coast route
which led to this place. Part of his army traversed
the narrow spit of land which separated the Lake
from the Mediterranean, and in doing so met
A strong wind setting in from the
north, as the troops were passing, brought the waters,
of the Mediterranean over the low strip of sand which,
is ordinarily dry, and confounding sea and shore and,
lake together, caused the destruction of a large de-
tachment ; but the main army, which had probably
kept Lake Serbonis on the right, reached its dest
nation intact. A skirmish followed between the
[heban troops of the first division under Lacrates
ind the garrison of Pelusium under Philophron; but
this first engagement was without definite result.
The two armies lay now for a while on the Pelusiac
branch of the Nile, which was well protected by forts,
fortified towns, and a network of canals on either side
of it. There was every reason to expect that Nekht-
nebf, by warily guarding his frontier, and making full
use of his resources, might baffle for a considerable
time, if not wholly frustrate, the Persian attack. But
his combined self-conceit and timidity ruined his
cause. Taking the direction of affairs wholly upon,
himself and asking no advice from his Greek captains,
he failed to show any of the qualities ofa great com-
mander, and was speedily involved in difficulties with
which he was quite incapable of dealing. Having had.
his first line of defence partially forced by a bold
‘movement on the part of the Argives under Nicos-
SURRENDER OF PELUSIUM. 309
tratus, instead of trying to redeem the misfortune by
a counter-movement, or a concentration of troops, he
hastily abandoned to his generals the task of con-
tinuing the resistance on this outer line, and retiring
to Memphis, concentrated all his efforts on making
preparations to resist a siege.
Meantime, the Persians were advancing. Tacrates
the Theban set himself to reduce Pelusium, and,
having drained dry one of the ditches, brought his
military engines up to the walls of the place. In
vain, however, did he batter down a portion of the
wall—the garrison had erected nother w: I behind
it; in vain did he advance his towers—they had
movable towers ready prepared to resist him. No
progress had been made by the besiege when on a
sudden the resi ice of the besieged slackened, In
telligence had reached them of Nekht-nebf’s hasty
retreat. If the king gave up hope, why should they
pour out their blood to no purpose? Accordingly
they ma te overtures to Lacrates for a surrender upon
terms, and it was agreed that they should be allowed
to evacuate the place and return to Greece, with all
the goods and chattels that they could carry with
them. Bagoas demurred to the terms; but Ochus
confirmed them, and Pelusivm passed into the pos-
session of the Persians without further fighting.
About the same time Mentor had proceeded south-
wards and laid sieg to Bubastis. Having invested
the town, he caused intelligence to reach the besieged
that Ochus had determined to spare all who should
surrender their cities to him without resistance, and
to treat with the utmost severity all who should fight
their defence. By these means he
introduced dissension within the walls of the towns,
since the native I yyptians and their Greek allies
naturally distrusted and suspected each other. At
Bubastis the Egyptians were the first to move, The
siege had only just begun when they sent an envoy
to Mentor’s colleague, Bagoas, to offer to surrender
the town to him. But this proceeding did not suit
the Greeks, who caught the messe r, extracted
from him hi message, and then attacked the Egyp-
tian portion of the garrison and slew great numbers
of them. The Egyptians, however, though beaten,
persisted, established communication with Bagoas,
and fixed a day on which they would receive his
forces into the town. Mentor, who wished to secure
to himself the credit of the surrender, hereupon e:
horted his Greek friends to be on the watch, and,
when the time came, to resist the movement. This
they did with such success that they not only frus-
trated the attempt, but captured Bagoas himself, who
had ventured within the walls. Bagoas had to im-
plore the interference of his col eague on his behalf,
and was obliged to promise that henceforth he would
attempt nothing without Mentor's knowledge and
consent. Mentor gained his ends, had the credit of
being the person to whom the town surrendered
itself, and at the
ancy over Bagoas. It is clear that had the Egyptians
possessed an active and able commander, advantage
might have been taken of the jealousies which
divided the Persian generals from their Greek col-
leagues, to bring the expedition into difficulties.
COMPLETE CONQUEST OF EGYPT. 401
ptian monarch, alike pusil-
\d_ incapable, was so far from making any
offensive effort, that he was not prepared even to,
defend his capital against the invaders. When he
found that Pelusium and Bubastis had both fallen,
and that the way lay open for the Persians to march,
upon Memphis and invest it, he left the city with
all the wealth on which he could lay his hands, and,
fled away into Ethiopia. Ochus did not pursue
him. He was content to have regained a valuable
province, which for above fifty years had been lost
to the Persian crown, w‘hout even having
fighta single pitched b tle, or to engage
difficult siege. According to the Greek writers, he
showed his contempt of the Egyptian reli
his conquest by stabbing an Apis-Bull, and violat.
ing. the sanctity of a number of the most holy,
shrines; but the story of the Apis-Bull is prob-
ably a fiction, and it was to obtain the plunder of
the temples, not to insult the Egyptian gods, that
he violated the shrines. There is no trace of his
having treated the conquered people with cruelty, or
even with severity. Prudence induced him to destroy
the walls and other fortifications of the chief Egyptian
towns; and cupidity led him to carry off into Persia
all the treasures that Nekht-nebf had left behind.
Even the sacred books, of which he is said to have
robbed the temples, may have been taken on account,
of their value. We donot hear of his having dragged
off any prisoners, or inflicted any punishment on the
country for its rebellion. Even the tribute is not said
to have been increased.
402 THE LIGHT GORS OUT IN DARKNESS.
‘There is nothing surprising in the fact that, when
once Persia took resolutely in hand the subjugation
of the revolted province, a few months sufficed for its
accomplishment. The resources of Persia were out
of all comparison with those of Egypt; alike in respect
of men and of money, there was an extreme disparity.
What had protected Egypt so long was the mul
plicity of Persia’s enemies, the lerge number of wars
that were continually being waged and the want ofa
bold, energetic, and warlike monarch. Assoon as the
full power of the vast empire of the Achamenidze was
directed against the little country which had detached
itself, and pretended to a separate existence, the result
Egypt could no more maintain a struggle
against Persia in full force than a lynx could contend
with a lion. But while all this is indubitably true,
the end of Egypt might have been more dignified and
more honourable than it was. Nekht-nebf, the last
kking, was a poor specimen of the Pharaonic type of
monarch. He had none of the qualities of a great
king. He did not even know how to fall with dignity.
Had he gathered togetherall the troops that he could
anyhow muster, and met Ochus in the open field, and
fallen fighting for his crown, or had he even defended,
Memphis to the last, and only yielded himself when,
he could resist no longer,a certain halo of glory would
have surrounded him. As it was, Egypt sank in
gloriously at the last—her art, her literature, her
national spirit decayed and almost extinet—paying,
by her early disappearance from among the nations
of the earth, the penalty of her extraordinarily preco-
cious greatness.
INDEX,
A J Aner
Anhoesby 152
Agra, Aboe off
Antiquities
| Apes oF Apiof cyofEgypt, 45,95
MT Aackheprkara,” 168 | Abepi
APepand andrue Josep,
Ape
Joseph 145
of, 144 32
Abraham, deceit of | ‘Apis
Abraham in Ey Apnics sacredoffendsaly Nebuchadnerzar
‘Alliance with,
Art andl literature, revival of

Paeceae Tiras AS, Tudaa revolts unr, 307
SAmenembat Laly ti
Amencmbat’s
‘Amenembat’s Resevol
Amentotep IILL), comucsts of, 206
‘Smenhotep
Amenhotep Hi,eruly
colon of of, 207208
‘Atventotep IIT, Hon tnt an gifts to Thothmes HL,
Ameninotep
ace of 222IIL, personal appeae me
Auars siege Of, 152
Amenhotep 1V.y
‘Amenhotep TIE, accession
wars of, oy 223
Ammon, restoration
High Priestofof temple
30) of, |
‘Ammon Babylon, revolt of,y 345
200, temple of, 105, 167,173, | Bats sacred bal,1 3
Ammon, Habe Vousout,
185 Bastinado, 43
Ammoncmes, or Amomneses, pre- | Bok-ensanf,
to‘worship,
crow 265, Builders, theof buming
Pyramid,
3 Buildings T
‘Animals sacred, 38 Bo
‘AntetLy 97 Balls sacred, 32
404 INDEX.
c Bgyptian independence re-stab-
Cairo, Modern, 52,05 by, 3 Teh
byes, ofindignities
Camaigns Thothimes I, 374
Chaldean Monarchy, end of,
acactet, Fgypiiany 25
harnctr, types of, 27 HI, 208. Ernpire of Davi and TSolomon,
es of Aten
condition,
sean socal, 60 Eaithaddon, accessiondefeat of,of fahak,
334
ie,
este ‘ofa Women, 6 353 Enrhaldon’s
pia and Syria, struggles
1 e,310themode of hunting, 105 “beteen 337 influence ing
hiopa, Egyptian
ashite, 156
Gypras, 97 Np pis taast fins
yrene, death ofof, 33239
(Chras, death hiopian ule ef oely
rts ofof,canted,
3 330
“3
Ethiopians, cnselyof, 338
D sit dees, 30037
arias, death of, 382
Dating, revolt against 38t Expos into sia, 167,195
Dari an Solomon, empite of
Famines
Dealne, 244260, 283
Tterature, 285, tion, 115through deficient inanda
he,
Fellahin,explaiaion
ouble, of invaders, 2 inst sex-fight, 277 of, 45
lest
Flora ofof EgyptHatasy 178
Hote theme of 35
Disaser of the Re Froe Trade i Fun 183
Disintegration, 3t1, 317 « 15
Dish worship, 233,285, 230,238
Drollery
Dynasties, Egyptiny 20
val, established, 311 Gos
Gratesof Eat
E
ieee ahes ellYeats
Cee eae aa at, 67
Egypt,
ES, Sto monotony of of,14 19 roca Panaile 32
My shape of,1
Eeypt, station of, 11
Egypu,
Esp size sal ofof, 910. Karna, 266
Egyptian history, happiest age of, fray as
Egyptian. 23
Hap, 32
INDEX, 495
api, merchanteet of, 178. ar aK
Hoi egor
Hap ‘regent lel foras aThoshues
male, 178 I, Koutesh, battle of, 2
Karrak; hall at, 266
Hap, 3Thothmes I L’ animosity Rarnak, temple a, 173, 198, 200,
sy
3494 380 of, 381
lost, 187queen, 1 Secession
Hatastactal
Matas’
Hebrew leet,
art, return Egyptianof 183influence
RhtenAtenpenonal_ KhscensAlen,8 227
appea-
207
Heliopolis anceot 22g
Hector, isttemplehigh>priest
at, 106 King,
Kul King 8290
By ing” pippeel
inguin dco press Bat 9 288
Hecate, 385
ites peste with 22
Miesites wareat ilywithy2a243 1
Labourng cts, cotiton of,131 45
Hoven, Shabai’s dealings with Tabyrntl
Tegtet of OstAmenemhat,
Hositge, Te arfseaet as tee
of 195,Thothmes IIL.'s system Fase eisof
Hiyksis conquered, 15 Bane, slanghue
Hylsts, religion of,
Hyksds ale, 139 143, auc and ay de ¢ of,
1 LoLower
wer Bayoorders 96condition of, 45,
Tmmigants, Senite, 100,150
Tamatalty of ‘the soul, belief in,
Tinton temple 317
Tara ” death of, 385, M
Tansy revolt offorest, Medes, the
Mesinet-Abot, 369
Teas
Tinie, Mego, cptitemple re of, 138
Taflsences, revival
corrupting, of, 350333 mphis,
x ib Hlockade and fll of,
gh Meni ken ty Bsastaddon,
Invasion,
Invasion by306 Menes,
Roah accion
K i n g , $0.82
of 253
Menskau-as KingRing,”68, 82,acces
Men-khepre'a, 90
Isael’soppresor, 249
J
eroboam
Jerusalem, destruction of, 36301
at Shishak’scourt, 3
foeph ant Ap a
Josiah,
Jude defeat
insecure,of 361by Nico, 357
udaa’s conquest, record of, 305 ‘40
INDEX.
Pharnabazus,
Phoenicia, 11 repulse of, 390
Monuinents
Moral stan bjctson, 196 | Phthah, temple of 5, 349 317
Vian, king of Napatia,
Panky rebelion againat, 318
Pankhi submission
Myth, to, 320 of > petty
Myths, chiEgyptian,
Egyptian, 34 pies
47, | Blin secten of 295,
Polytheisi
Pret
ie King High aof Ammon, of they 297289
patra, Nec Driats, Kings ta awe of 288
Natural History of Eaypiy 6 | Pets Kings ave of
Naval power
any of Nero, of 354Thothines TH Soya
‘chtchadnensav ad Neco, 358. Pasmatik 1. and Gyges, 345,
Nebuchadnezzar overruns Egypt, |Peamnatik p scmuibeng 1) Sole ofah 343,3
i n. king,
ian Paainaik
Neos, secession of, 354
New defeats Josiah, 357 DamatikLyI manage vetory of,
of 48
340 ae
Neco, nay oh 354 Pomaik ir, architeetwal
ino :
Necan Ly accetion
ebo
Nectanebo "Ly sacophag of, 9 8 7 _ | Pmablk ly aecesion of 374
feta,
Nekinbs sonaccesion
of Sefer,of 39464
Nile navighton
Nile valley
ring ony 131 3
of1, the,
Nile 957108) 117 Pyeanid builders, Bgypt under
Nineveh, 92 tie, ailders the, 82
Pyramid
pram, great, 72
° Pyramidof Mejdoum, 58
Obelisk of Usortacen L, 196137 ramds,of Egyptian Strayides3 of
‘Objects on monuments,
ches expenof 304 is, tee, at Ghize, 67
R
Ra-Sekenen
Tousy of 150 Apepi’s jea-
HL,
Pacis, sere bull | RasSekenen IIL, war forced up.
Dari, on, 15
Payment of tbte, 199) Ramesses
Deluna.
Persia, tied sur ender of,agent,
rebellion 399) 385 | Rimesses
Kamesen Hi,IL, HiItal’
t e waroppreson
of 239
Femi congue 38 a 11 ee
ee eee
Pharnabazus attack by, 388,th Ramesses
233 IIL, losing years of
INDEX. 407
Shepherds, Egypt under,
. plot
emplto ill of, 372285 Sheshonk dyaauty defeat 1399,30)
Red Sea, dister submisof 64OF 505 Shishak, acces
Rehoboai, Shishak
Religion, 35-41 Shisha dominion foreign origin of 30,of, 208
Reserves Amencibat's, 118
Revival of Arteand Tact, 350 Shishak invades Joe,of Jeroboam,
ishak’s reception 303
Revolt agaist Dans, 381
Revolt against the311Persians, sion, capture of, 396,
ial dynasties, Siege of
Rut Ammon, accession and death Ser onco ming
of 338
Shcfer steers hing
Socal condition 60.
3» Great Pyramid of, 59 Social rank 33
tered balls, 32 Sosy, von of 45,
Sto John Lateran, monument of, Songof vier, 108
Semi-ka-ra, King, 99 Soul bliin immortality of, 39
Sapaargon, death of, 337, 232 Sphins
Stenda,rd,the.moral,92 42
Sargon, founder af fast Assyrian
Stee
Syria Isthmu s of1ia, struggle be-
and Ethiop
ciymasy, 326 || Syria
sat abc as evan by Neco, 359
Semetic immigrants, 130 R
Senmacheri,aecesion of Tachos, accession of, 393,
Sennacherib, Taxation, heavy, 43 937
mete victories army, of,detucton 3 ‘Tebrak, death
of
329yp diy, 143 Telak’ defeated Uy Asshurbani-
ety al, 336,defeated by Esarhaddon,
‘Téhak
Set[Sei thethe wetorions, 269,
Great, itores of, 234 ;| Dahir, 185
Setiithethe Great,Great wars ong ofwall of 257
Seti the Great, pleouof $1Ammon, 167,173,186,
0 of Karnak, 198, 200, 304,
Sei
SoU age 8Ly bea oh 2 ‘Temple
319, 380of Medinet-Abow, 272
Tenpic
Shab, tens death Bkof,iS337 anf 323 ‘Temple of Phthaby 349
Shabab’s congue of Lower
324, dealings with‘ Tse,
SIRS ‘Thothmes I) greatness of 168
‘Thothnes [Stories of 159
‘Sabato ‘Thothimes
‘ThoshmesHi, death of, 47
Stata, sccesion
King, 82. 90: of,92 527
Shasoy campaign agent the, 273 Hatass,
08 INDEX.
hanes
ottne IEI campaign
baling | UstaenaLy sae 1s
fot | Use i, ong oy
Thothmes i, font obelinkeof | v
‘Thothimes IIT, naval power of, | Vietora, lake, 8
Victory song of, 198
‘Thothmes IHL, personal appear Vocal Menon, the, 212
ance of 204
“Theses HI system of tribute, w
19
TT Hot5hoves IL, ti tesof,M198
196 |
|
Waly Halla, 106
Waly Magharaby 5,
ings, King, 135
RininoctiptagG,37 | Wench fio
ree aAeainaeof tke Wander
Seen
mero,nee ois Wont,
|e eercostume of 62
u
»sonobeliskof Amenembt,
of, z13
‘Vartacen E } | Zabara, Mount
toy ‘era feat cl, 308
The Story of the Mations.
Messrs. G. P. PUTNAM’S SONS take pleasure in
announcing that they have in course of publication, in
co-operation with Mr. T. Fisher Unwin, of London, a
series of historical studies, intended to present in a
graphic manner the stories of the different nations that
have attained prominence in history.
In the story form the current of each national life is
distinctly indicated, and its picturesque and noteworthy
periods and episodes are presented for the reader in their
philosophical relation to each other as well as to universal
history.
It is the plan of the writers of the different volumes to
enter into the real life of the peoples, and to bring them
before the reader as they actually lived, labored, and
struggled—as they studied and wrote, and as they amused
themselves. In carrying out this plan, the myths, with
which the history of all lands begins, will not be over-
looked, though these wil be carefully distinguished from
the actual history, so far as the labors of the accepted
historical authorities have resulted in definite conclusions.
The subjects of the different volumes have been planned
to cover connecting and, as far as possible, consecutive
epochs or periods, so that the sct when completed will
present in a comprehensive narrative the chief events in
the great STORY OF THE NATIONS; but it is, of course,
not always pi to issue the several volumes in
ted in good readable type, and
They are adequately illustrated
and furnished with maps and indexes. Price, per vol,
cloth, $1.50. Half morocco, gilt top, $1.75
The following are now ready:
GREECE. Prof. Jas. A. Harri: | THE HANSA TOWNS, Helen
‘on. Arthur Gilman. Zimmer.
ROME, EARLY BRITAIN. Prof. Alfred
THE JEWS. Protdames KeHos:| J Church
mer. 2. A. Ragozin. THE‘StanleyGARBARY CORSAIRS,
CHALDEA, Lane-Poole.
GERMANY. S. RUSSIA. W. R. Morfi
NORWAY. Hjal THE JEWS UNDER ROME. W
SPAIN. Rev. E, E. and Susan | SCOTLAND. John Mackintosh,
Hale. Prof A.Vimbry, | SWITZERLAND,
HUNGARY. Mrs, A Hug: 'R. Stead and
CARTHAGE. | Prof, Alfred J.| PORTUGAL. H. Morse Stevens.
THE‘Church.
SARACENS, Arthur Gilt) | THEW. BYZANTINE
C. Oman. EMPIRE. CG,
THEman.MOORS IN SPAIN. Stan-| | SICILY.” EA. Freeman,
THE TUSCAN REPUBLICS,
ley Lane-Poole. ‘Bella Durty.
THE NORMANS, Sarah Orne | POLAND. WsGeo,R. Rawlinson,
Morfil,
‘Jewett. PARTHIA.
PERSIA. S. QW. Benjamin. | JAPAN, David Murray.
ANCIENT
Rawlinson.EGYPT. Prof, Geo. THE‘OF CHRISTIAN RECOVERY
SPAIN. H.E, Watts.
ALEXANDER’S EMPIRE. Prof | AUSTRALASIA. Greville Tro-
ae, Mahat
ASSyRiA. ZA: Ragozin. | uth, AFRICA. Geo. M.
SOUTHERN
He GOTHS.Hon, Vion!
IRELAND. Emily Bradley,
Lawless, || VENICE.
oTheal Alethea Wiel,
TURKEY. Stanley Lane-Poole,
MEDIA, BABYLON, AND PER: | THE
and CRUSADES,
C. L. Kingsford.T. S. Archer
‘SIA. Z. A, Ragozin, VEDIC INDIA. 2. A. Ragozin.
MEDIEVAL FRANCE, Prof. | BOHEMIA. C.E, Maurice.
‘Gustave Masson. CANADA.BALKANJ, G, STATES.
Bourinot. Wik
HOLLAND. "Prof. J. Thorold THE
Rogers. iam Miller.
MEXICO. Susan Hale. BRITISH RULE IN INDIA, Ri
PHGENICIA, Geo. Rawlinson, |W. Frazer.
Meroes of the Mations.
EVELYN ABBOTT, M.A., Futtow or Bantiot Couper, OxroxD.
A SERIES of biographical studies of the lives and work

of a number of representative historical characters about
whom have gathered the great traditions of the Nations
to which they belonged, and who have be
many instances, as types of the several
With the life of each typical character wil be presented
a picture of the National conditions surrounding him
during his career.
The narratives are the work of writers who are recog-
nized authorities on their several subjects, and, while
thoroughly trustworthyas history, will present picturesque
and dramatic “ stories” of the Men and of the events con-
nected with them.
To the Life of each “Hero” will be given one duo-
decimo volume, handsomely printed in large type,
vided with maps and adequately illustrated accordi
the special requirements of the several subjects.
volumes will be sold separately as follow:
IGiotitextrats
Half morocco, uncut edges,
The following are now ready (Sept., 1897
Nelson,
RUSsHLt, and author the Naval of "TheSupremacy Week of theof Grosvenor,”
England, teBy W. Ciank
Gustavus
fence, andAdolphus, Rr andFLETCuEE,
BytheC. Golden the Struggle MA. offate Protestantism for College
Exist-
Periles, Age of Atheas. IiyFellowEvnivy
of All Anton,
Souls MA
‘TheodoricMastheHobeKIX, Goth, theauthorBarbarian Champion
of Italy and Her Invaders,” ete of Civilisation. Hy
BOURKE, Sidney,author of and the"The LifeChivalry of Jon ofLockey”England. ete Dy 1 . K, Fox:
JuliusWann Cassar, and theMAe-Fellow
Fowunk, Organisationof Lincoln of the Roman Cllege, Empire,
Oxford By W.
John Wryclif, Last ofthe Schoolmen and First of the English Ree
formers," By Luvis Sexckant, author of" New Greece” ee
Napoleon, "Warrior onary France. and) Roler, Ty W. andO'Consox
the ‘Miltary Monts Supremacy of
Henty M.A.,of Navaire,
Fellow of andExeterthe College, Huguesoteof OxfordFrance. Vy . F, Waren,
Cicero,‘Daviosox,and theMA.,Fall Fellow of the of Roman Republic.OxfordBy J. L. Staaca®
Baltl College,
AbrahamNow Lincola, noon and the Downfall of American Slavery. By
Prince‘covery.Henry iy(ofC, Portugal) Re Beast, theFellow Navigator,
of MertonandCallege, the AgeOxfordof Dis-
JulianChristianity.
the Philosopher, iy Aviceand theGantt Last Struggle of Paganism against
LouisHascati,XIV., asdMA,theSenor ZenithStulent of theof French
Christ Church Monarchy. Collage, lyOxfordAxrtor
Charles
iy Ky Kil, and the Collapse of the Swedish Empire, 1682-1719.
Lorenzo de’Nigmn
Medici,Batsand Florence in the 1sth Century. By
JeanneAnatsrEONG,
Ware, HerM-A.,LifeFellow and ofDeath. Queen's ByCollege, Osfort
Mis Ouamitavr.
istopher
invisc. Columbus. His Life and Voyages. ly, WasitNeron
Robertiy Sikthe Henne Bruce, and Saxe, the Struggle AE for Scottish Independence.
Hannibal, Soldier, Carthage Statesman, Patriot; and the Crisis of the Strug-
gle between and Rome. by W. O'Cosxor Monks,
. Scholar sador,of andOssitheCllege, WaningOxford of the Crescent in the West.
iy
Ulysses 8. Grant, CLARKE,and t h e Wintham
Period College,
of Oxford Preservation and
National
nteegreesnn gen, tua cag
sobert E. Lee, and the Southern Confederacy, 1807-1870.
or, Heat Auexansax Wat,of Washingios fad Lea Unione
To be followed by
Moltice,
Witissox, and theUniversity Military of Lotion,Supremacy of Germany. tly a Srmvces
Bismarck. The New German Empire, How it Arose and What it
JudasDisplaced. Maccabaus,“Ty theW. Conflict J. Hrabiastbetween McA., Hellenism
Fellow of Ring's College.
and Hebraism,
Henry iy V.,Isaac theABRAIAMS English authorKing.
Hero of the Ij Jews in the L, KINGSFORD,
Citakits Mid le Ages." joint-
thot of the "Story of the Crusades,
Newyork G. P, PUTNAM’S SONS LONDON
i eB
iow eww ee
a a a a oe
a a a ee ed
Pa
a a ee eh
i ed
Pe ae
a a
eee ee
(ee ow ew
a
a ee a ee ae we we oe a a
3 eee eR EEO ee ee
eri hee ee A ee ee a
veeuwer
2
rye ae #
reece CEA Ad iad : ied
AD Er ee i
LAE rd weve we ewe ee ee
ee ee ee ee
AAD AA Ee
BOE LEAL AAS ed
en ee ee ee he DD bal ei
REESE A ee
ee ae eS HR ww HO ee
Ew TORS HR eee
Se a ee ’
eee ee ee ee 2
Ci Ath te tt i a d
eee eee ee ee ee ee ee
eee ee ee ee ee e e l
A errs se ee ee oe ee
Pe a
CA ee ee ee eee a
teen eee oe ee eee es ee we ew we
ead owe
a Ee ee
PPP ere ee TEED AD
Pera a ee ke ee ed
AAAS DADE Se ee Dei ee
EE DES ET eee ee Eh
hee Ae A
EE Peer te ee
DADE SAS
ee ee id
ee EE ea wee ere ge
4 aa ee ee
Po ee a ee ee
eee ee
A
i
nan
nnn
| i

The Story of Ancient Egypt Author George Rawlinson

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Story of Ancient Egypt Author George Rawlinson

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Story of Ancient Egypt Author George Rawlinson

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3 1162 04538901 3

THE STORY OF TIE NATIONS

FUNG @iGE) NGI Gaver

ARTHUR GILMAN, WA.

iveGheolor Eoren | fate e yo

Tue First Great Warrior Kino, THornmes I. 158-169

Tne Persian Conquest... + 368

inpex oh) a oe eee

BUST OF RAMESSES IL. 4 4 5 5 «= 125i

Even more terrible than Bes was Apep, the great

Khons, and Neith; if a Heliopolite, Tum, Nebhebt

many places traces of hieroglyphical inscriptions.

Saccarah. Here the architect carried up a monument

the head for the sake of cleanliness. But otherwise.

of the entrance passage, are almost equally massive.

of thestructure. It measures forty-six feet by twenty-

receives its last tributary, the Atbara. But anciently

was no poverty in my my time,

directed it against the Nubian chief so surely that it

one would think, have been a countrywoman or tne

upright upon the ships’ decks, and screened from the

the pair of obelisks whereof this was one shrank i nto

exercised the sovereign power for about thirty two

ia even much later than the time of Amenhotep,

xypt while her husband was alive. At

OF AMENHOTEE 18. (KMUEXATES).

“Aperiu”; but this view is not generally accepted.

* The mummy of SetiI. has been recently uncovered Tt

Egyptian monarchs had regarded it as incumbent on

qualifications ; rather we must presume that he.

men, The “men of Judah” bore spears and targets,

adorned the approaches to these new shrines; the

coldness, and did not for some time reinstate him in

aggression still continued. In Bc. 711 Sargon took

the conqueror returned to Nineveh, having first, how-

and full of the ambition which naturally inspires

possib.e aloof from foreigners, a nd looked upon them

the two fl ets into one, when occasion should require,

Art andl literature, revival of

A SERIES of biographical studies of the lives and work

You might also like

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.