Lecture ch6 (II) Hul213
Lecture ch6 (II) Hul213
Lecture ch6 (II) Hul213
Lecture 09
Feb 08; 2024
Growth and Ideas
Explaining the above graph
▶ How can this be true? What was wrong with our basic
supply-and-demand intuition?
▶ Our story about demand is surely correct:
▶ It turns out that rather than being finite, supply must have
expanded by even more than demand.
▶ We found new supplies of these resources and discovered new
technologies for extracting.
▶ We discovered new ways to use these resources more
efficiently.
▶ On net, these supply forces evidently outweighed the massive
increases in demand during the twentieth century, leading to
large overall price declines.
▶ We can use the labor-adjusted growth rate version of the
production function to determine the unobserved residual
(TFP growth).
▶ Suppose that the number of hours worked by the labor force
can change over time:
▶ When the economy is booming, people may work more hours
per week.
▶ When the economy is in a recession, people may work fewer
hours per week.
Growth accounting - 2
▶ The equation in the last slide tells us that the growth rate of
output per hour, YL , over a time period can be viewed as the
sum of three terms.
▶ The first term is the contribution from the growth of capital
per hour worked by the labor force. As capital per hour rises,
output per hour rises as well, but this effect is reduced
according to the degree of diminishing returns to capital,
one-third.
▶ The second term is the growth rate of workers less the growth
rate of total hours. In actual applications of growth
accounting, this term can also include increases in education
or changes in the age distribution of the workforce.
▶ Therefore, we call it “labor composition.”
Growth accounting - 2
The above table shows the Growth Accounting for the United
States:
▶ It shows the four terms of the adjusted growth equation for
the United States.
▶ It is shown for the entire period 1948 to 2017, and then for
particular subperiods.
▶ Output per hour grew at an average annual rate of 2.3
percent between 1948 and 2017. Of this 2.3 percent,
▶ 0.9 percentage points were due to an increase in the capital
labor ratio, K /L.
▶ 0.2 percentage points came from changes in the composition
of the labor force, including increased years of education.
▶ TFP growth accounted for the majority of growth, at 1.2
percentage points.
Thank you!