Indian Digital Policy
Indian Digital Policy
Indian Digital Policy
UDIT AGGARWAL
VINOD KUMAR
IIFT DELHI
The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023
➢ Personal data may be processed only for a lawful purpose upon consent of an individual. Consent may not be required for specified legitimate uses such
as the voluntary sharing of data by the individual or processing by the State for permits, licenses, benefits, and services.
➢ Data fiduciaries will be obligated to maintain the accuracy of data, keep data secure, and delete data once its purpose has been met.
➢ The Bill grants certain rights to individuals including the right to obtain information, seek correction and erasure, and grievance redressal.
➢ The central government may exempt government agencies from the application of provisions of the Bill in the interest of specified grounds such as
security of the state, public order, and prevention of offences.
➢ The central government will establish the Data Protection Board of India to adjudicate non-compliance with the provisions of the Bill.
INDIAN DIGITAL ACT, 2023
INDIAN DIGITAL ACT IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES EDUCATING PEOPLE OPTIMAL IMPLEMENTATION
KEY INFODIGITAL
INDIAN ABOUT 692 million 399 million 19.5 GB #2 48.7% $63 billion
ECOSYSTEM
ALLCARGO LOGISTICS Internet Rural Per Month Largest Internet Internet
Users Users Data Use Internet User Penetration Rate Revenue
Processing of personal data: (i) within India, (ii) Expands the scope under the 2018 Bill Does not cover offline personal data
outside India if it is for business carried on, to cover certain anonymized personal and non-automated processing
Scope and Applicability offering of goods and services, or profiling data
individuals, in India
Reporting of data Fiduciary to notify the Data Protection Authority Every personal data breach must be reported to
about a breach that is likely to cause harm, the Same as the 2018 Bill the Data Protection Board of India and each
breaches Authority will decide whether to notify the data affected data principal, in the prescribed manner
principals or not
Right to Data Data principal will have the right to data portability
(to obtain data in interoperable format), and right
Portability And Right to to be forgotten (to restrict disclosure of personal
Provided for both rights Not provided
Personal data processing by the State has been given For interception of communication on grounds such as national security, the The Bill does not regulate risks of harm arising out of
several exemptions under the Bill. As per Article 12 Supreme Court (1996) had mandated various safeguards including: (i) the processing of personal data. The Srikrishna
of the Constitution, the State includes (i) central establishing necessity, (ii) purpose limitation, and (iii) storage limitation. Committee (2018) observed that harm is a possible
government, (ii) state government, (iii) local bodies, These are similar to the obligations of data fiduciaries under the Bill, the consequence of personal data processing. Harm
and (iv) authorities and companies set up by the application of which has been exempted. The Srikrishna Committee (2018) may include material losses such as financial loss and
government. There may be certain issues with such recommended that in case of processing on grounds such as national loss of access to benefits or services. It may also
exemptions. security and prevention and prosecution of offences, obligations other than include identity theft, loss of reputation,
fair and reasonable processing and security safeguards should not apply. discrimination, and unreasonable surveillance and
profiling.4 It had recommended that harms should
be regulated under a data protection law.
Adequacy of protection in case of cross-border Whether overriding consent for purposes such as Right to data portability and the right to be
transfer of data benefit, subsidy, license, and certificates is appropriate forgotten not provided
The Bill overrides the consent of an individual where the State processes The Bill does not provide for the right to data
The Bill provides that the central government may personal data for the provision of benefit, service, license, permit, or portability and the right to be forgotten. The 2018
restrict the transfer of personal data to certain certificate. It specifically allows the use of data processed for one of these Draft Bill and the 2019 Bill introduced in Parliament
countries through a notification. This implies the purposes for another. It also allows the use of personal data already provided for these rights. The Joint Parliamentary
transfer of personal data to all other countries available with the State for any of these purposes. Hence, it removes Committee, examining the 2019 Bill, recommended
without any explicit restrictions. This question is purpose limitation, which is one of the key principles for protection of retaining these rights. GDPR also recognizes these
whether this mechanism will provide adequate privacy. Purpose limitation means data should be collected for specific rights. The Srikrishna Committee (2018) observed
protection. purposes, and should be used only for that purpose. The question is that a strong set of rights of data principals is an
whether such exemptions are appropriate. essential component of a data protection law. These
Since data taken for various purposes could be combined, this could allow rights are based on principles of autonomy,
the profiling of citizens. On the other hand, if consent were required, transparency, and accountability to give individuals
individuals would have autonomy and control over the collection and sharing control over their data.
of their data.
KEY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Shorter appointment term may impact Definition of child different from other jurisdictions Drafting Issues
independence of the Board
While it is an accepted principle that the processing of a child’s data should
be subject to greater protection, there are differences in how different
The Bill provides that members of the Data Lawmakers made errors while drafting the law,
jurisdictions define a child for giving consent for the processing of personal
Protection Board of India will function as an which could lead to incorrect interpretation.
data. Under the Bill, a child has been defined as a person below 18 years of
independent body. Members will be appointed for For example: Clause 27 (1) (e) refers to the sub-
age. The Srikrishna Committee (2018) recommended that while determining
two years and will be eligible for re-appointment. A section (2) of Clause 36, however, Clause 36 does
the age of consent for children, certain factors should be considered. These
short term with the scope for re-appointment may not have any sub-sections.
include: (i) a minimum age of 13 and a maximum age of 18, and (ii) a single
affect independent functioning of the Board. threshold for ensuring practical implementation.4 It also observed that 18
years may be too high from the perspective of the full autonomous
development of a child.4 However, to be consistent with the existing legal
framework, the age of consent should be 18 years. Under the Indian
Contract Act,1872, the minimum age to sign a contract is 18.
Exemption from notice for consent may not be Taking verifiable parental consent may require Lack of clarity on what constitutes detrimental
appropriate verification of everyone’s age on digital platforms to well-being of a child
Shortcomings Shortcomings
Unlike other countries, the PIPL has no derogation provisions for The GDPR's provisions are often vague and difficult to interpret by
No derogation provisions Vague provisions
cross-border transfer. corporate.
The PIPL lacks provisions for data protection by design and by Data brokers are still stockpiling and selling information, which
No privacy by design Data brokers
default. eventually defeats purpose of the law.
The PIPL requires businesses and government agencies to obtain GDPR didn't impose substantial fines on big tech, most of which
No clear consent form individual consent before processing personal information, but the Fines on big tech continues to persist in conducting extensive online surveillance on a
required form and method of that consent is not clear. huge scale, evading significant consequences.
The PIPL exempts businesses and government agencies from A large and increasing pile of filings are still unresolved, some of
Exemptions Unresolved filings
obtaining individual consent when there is a “statutory basis”. which date back to the day GDPR was launched.
Learnings Learnings
➢ Over 290,000 multinational corporations are active in India, and the diplomatic ➢ India must precisely articulate its laws, aiming for comprehensive coverage, as
dynamics of India differ significantly from those of China. Consequently, it is crucial for overlooking certain aspects could result in loopholes and potential abuse of power by
India to establish derogation provisions to uphold harmony with the legal frameworks major corporations in the future.
of partner nations. ➢ Establishing a robust security check system is imperative to counteract existing data
➢ While the Chinese political system may afford less privacy, India must prioritize brokers who might retain and sell data, necessitating a thorough data auditing process.
safeguarding the privacy of its citizens. ➢ Implementing fines based on the size of firms can serve as a deterrent, preventing
➢ The formulation of clear and robust laws is essential, as ambiguous consent forms large corporations from abusing their influence.
could potentially create loopholes with implications for the public. ➢ India should institute an effective mechanism from the outset to prevent the
➢ In contrast to China, India should only permit exemptions in cases of national security accumulation of filings in the future, thereby averting the development of bureaucratic
and should avoid unnecessary scrutiny of data. red tape.
SUGGESTED CHANGES
Compliance Burden Freedom of Expression Proper Infrastructure Privacy Concerns
The act’s regulations may place a The review of the "safe harbour" principle Effective enforcement of the DIA will Critics argue that certain provisions of the
significant burden on businesses, for online platforms could potentially require substantial resources, expertise, act may grant excessive surveillance
particularly small and medium-sized impact freedom of expression. Ensuring and infrastructure. Investing in these areas powers to the government, potentially
enterprises (SMEs). that the act doesn't curb this fundamental will be crucial. compromising privacy rights.
right is a delicate task.
Data Localization
and Cross-Border Modification
Data Flows
India hosts more than 290,000 This also implies that the government India needs to set up contractual clauses
multinational corporations (MNCs), all of should establish a system for monitoring that can be used to ensure that personal
The act’s approach to data localization is a which need to transfer data across the flow of data leaving India. To achieve data transferred to a third country is
point of contention. While localization can borders. This underscores the importance this, the government should consider adequately protected, covering a wide
enhance data protection and security, it of harmonizing our digital laws with those forming organizations similar to customs range of topics, including data security,
may also disrupt cross-border data flows, of other countries. agencies to oversee data transfers. and data subjects' rights.
impacting global businesses that rely on
efficient data transfers.
SUGGESTED INFRASTRUCTURE
Develop a comprehensive national cybersecurity strategy
National Cybersecurity that outlines the government's approach to securing critical
Ensure that government agencies comply with relevant
infrastructure, protecting sensitive information, and
cybersecurity standards, such as NIST Cybersecurity Regulatory Compliance
Strategy responding to cyber threats.DIGITAL ACT
Framework, to protect government data and systems.
Create mechanisms for sharing cybersecurity threat Pay attention to the security of open-source software used Open Source Software
Security Information Sharing intelligence and information between government agencies, in government systems and encourage secure coding
private sector organizations, and international partners. practices. Security
Cybersecurity Awareness and Promote cybersecurity awareness and education campaigns If using cloud services, ensure the security of government
to educate citizens, businesses, and government employees data stored in the cloud by following best practices and Secure Cloud Adoption
Education about best practices and threats. compliance standards.
Secure government IT systems and networks through Ensure the security of emergency communication systems, Emergency Communication
Secure Government Networks measures such as firewalls, intrusion detection and such as 911 services, to maintain their availability during
prevention systems, and data encryption. crises. Systems
Communicating Law to Public
Awareness Online Mobile Apps Workshops and Collaborate with
Campaigns Platforms & Websites Seminars Institutions
Launch comprehensive campaigns Develop user-friendly websites Create mobile apps that offer Conduct workshops and seminars Partner with schools, colleges,
through various media channels, and online platforms dedicated to concise information, updates, and in schools, colleges, and and universities to integrate
including television, and social media, educating the public about digital resources related to digital laws. community centres. digital law education into the
to disseminate information. laws in India. curriculum.