ELT2035 Signals: & Systems
ELT2035 Signals: & Systems
Time domain
?
𝑥(𝑡) ℎ(𝑡) 𝑦(𝑡)
Time domain
?
𝑥(𝑡) ℎ(𝑡) 𝑦(𝑡)
∞
FT domain 𝑋 𝑘 𝛿 𝜔 − 𝑘𝜔0 × 𝐻(𝑗𝜔) = 𝑌(𝑗𝜔)
𝑘=−∞
➢ Applying the sifting property of the impulse:
𝑌 𝑗𝜔 = 2𝜋 σ∞
𝑘=−∞ 𝑋 𝑘 𝛿 𝜔 − 𝑘𝜔0 𝐻(𝑗𝑘𝜔0 ).
➢ The form of 𝑌 𝑗𝜔 corresponds to a periodic signal → 𝑦(𝑡) is periodic with
the same period as 𝑥(𝑡)
−𝜔0 𝜔0
𝜔
−4𝜔0 −2𝜔0 2𝜔0 4𝜔0
2𝜋𝑋[1]
H 𝑗𝜔
𝜔
𝜔0 𝜔0 𝜔0 𝜔0 2𝜔0 4𝜔0
Y 𝑗𝜔
2𝜋𝑋 0 𝐻[𝑗0]
2𝜋𝑋 2 𝐻(𝑗2𝜔0 )
−𝜔0 𝜔0
𝜔
−4𝜔0 −2𝜔0 2𝜔0 4𝜔0
2𝜋𝑋[1]𝐻(𝑗𝜔0 )
Ideal filters
Example
Let the input signal applied to an LTI system with impulse ℎ 𝑡 =
1
sin 𝜋𝑡 be the periodic square wave. Find the output of the system.
𝜋𝑡
❑ Solution:
1, 𝜔 ≤ 𝜋
➢ The system frequency response is ℱ ℎ(𝑡) = 𝐻(𝑗𝜔) = ቊ .
0, 𝜔 > 𝜋
2 sin 𝑘𝜋 Τ2 𝜋
➢ The FT of the periodic square wave 𝑋 𝑗𝜔 = σ∞
𝑘=−∞ 𝛿 𝜔−𝑘 .
𝑘 2
➢ The FT of the system output is
𝜋 𝜋
𝑌 𝑗𝜔 = 𝑋 𝑗𝜔 𝐻 𝑗𝜔 = 2𝛿 𝜔 + + 𝜋𝛿 𝜔 + 2𝛿 𝜔 − .
2 2
1 2 𝜋
➢ Taking the inverse FT of 𝑌 𝑗𝜔 gives the output 𝑦 𝑡 = + cos 𝑡 .
2 𝜋 2
Example solution from frequency
domain perspective
H 𝑗𝜔
𝜔
❖ Observation: 𝐻 𝑗𝜔 acts as −𝜋 𝜋
others.
𝜔
−𝜋 −𝜋/2 𝜋/2 𝜋
Y 𝑗𝜔
𝜔
−𝜋/2 𝜋/2
2. Amplitude modulation (AM)
▪ Antenna efficiency
(size, power
radiation, …) for
high range
transmission.
▪ Spectral efficiency
(highest freq.
/lowest freq.)
▪ Interference
prevention
➢ Let 𝐴𝑚𝑎𝑥 & 𝐴𝑚𝑖𝑛 denote the maximum & minimum values of the envelope of
𝐴 −𝐴
the modulated wave, then 𝜇 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝐴𝑚𝑎𝑥 +𝐴𝑚𝑖𝑛
1
➢ 𝑆 𝑗𝜔 = 𝜋𝐴𝑐 𝛿 𝜔 − 𝜔𝑐 + 𝛿(𝜔 + 𝜔𝑐 ) + 𝜋𝜇𝐴𝑐 [𝛿 𝜔 − 𝜔𝑐 − 𝜔0 + 𝛿 (𝜔 −
2
1
𝜔𝑐 + 𝜔0 )] + 𝜋𝜇𝐴𝑐 𝛿 𝜔 + 𝜔𝑐 − 𝜔0 + 𝛿 𝜔 + 𝜔𝑐 + 𝜔0
2
Example solution
3. Sampling of continuous time signals
*
Practical reconstruction
❑ Let’s check if DTFS derived from sampling the DTFT above is the same
as the DTFS that is computed directly:
1 31 3𝜋𝑛 −𝑗𝑘Ω 𝑛
➢ 𝑋𝑘 = σ𝑛=0 cos 𝑒 0 , with Ω = 2𝜋 Τ𝑁.
𝑁 8 0
1 −𝑗 𝑘Ω0 +3𝜋 Τ8 𝑛 1
➢ 𝑋𝑘 = σ31
𝑛=0 𝑒 + σ31
𝑛=0 𝑒 −𝑗 𝑘Ω0 −3𝜋Τ8 𝑛 ,
after some simple
2𝑁 2𝑁
manipulations, the direct method also yields the same 𝑋[𝑘] as given in (1).
5. Fast Fourier transform
❑ Computing the DTFS directly from the definition is often too slow
1
➢ 𝑋 𝑘 = σ𝑁−1 𝑥[𝑛]𝑒 −𝑗𝑘Ω0 𝑛 , 𝑥 𝑛 = σ𝑁−1
𝑘=0 𝑋[𝑘]𝑒
𝑗𝑘Ω0 𝑛
→ an algorithm can
𝑁 𝑛=0
compute either relationship with minor changes.
➢ Evaluating 𝑥[𝑛] for a single value of 𝑛 requires 𝑁 complex multiplications &
𝑁 − 1 complex additions → the complete computation of 𝑥[𝑛] requires 𝑁2
complex multiplications and 𝑁2 − 𝑁 complex additions.
❑ Suppose 𝑁 is even
➢ Split 𝑋[𝑘] into even- and odd-indexed coefficients, i.e. 𝑋𝑒[𝑘] = 𝑋[2𝑘], 0 ≤ 𝑘 ≤
𝑁’ − 1 and 𝑋𝑜[𝑘] = 𝑋[2𝑘 + 1], 0 ≤ 𝑘 ≤ 𝑁’ − 1 with 𝑁’ = 𝑁/2, we have:
𝑁 −1 ′ ′
𝑥 𝑛 = σ𝑚=0 𝑋[2𝑚]𝑒 𝑗𝑚2Ω0 𝑛 + σ𝑁 −1
𝑚=0 𝑋[2𝑚 + 1]𝑒
𝑗(𝑚2Ω0 𝑛+Ω0 𝑛)
=
′ ′ ′ ′
σ𝑁 −1
𝑚=0 𝑋𝑒[𝑚]𝑒
𝑗𝑚Ω0 𝑛
+ 𝑒 𝑗Ω0 𝑛 σ𝑁 −1
𝑚=0 𝑋𝑜 [𝑚]𝑒
𝑗𝑚Ω0 𝑛
= 𝑥𝑒 𝑛 + 𝑒 𝑗Ω0 𝑛 𝑥𝑜 𝑛 .
′ )Ω
➢ Since 𝑥𝑒 𝑛 + 𝑁 ′ = 𝑥𝑒 𝑛 , 𝑥𝑜 𝑛 + 𝑁 ′ = 𝑥𝑜 𝑛 , and 𝑒 𝑗(𝑛+𝑁 0 = −𝑒 𝑗𝑛Ω0 ,
𝑥 𝑛 = 𝑥𝑒 𝑛 + 𝑒 𝑗𝑛Ω0 𝑥𝑜 𝑛 , 0 ≤ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑁 ′ − 1 (4.49)
as the first 𝑁 ′ values of 𝑥 𝑛 , and
𝑥 𝑛 + 𝑁 ′ = 𝑥𝑒 𝑛 − 𝑒 𝑗𝑛Ω0 𝑥𝑜 𝑛 , 0 ≤ 𝑛 ≤ 𝑁 ′ − 1 (4.50)
as the second 𝑁 ′ values of 𝑥 𝑛 .
Fast Fourier transform
(cont.)
❑ Only need to multiply 𝑒 𝑗𝑛Ω0 once in computing both Eqs. (4.49) &
(4.50). The remaining operations are addition and subtraction.
Fast Fourier transform
(cont.)
❑ The total number of complex multiplications required to evaluate
Eqs. (4.49) and (4.50) are 𝑁2/2 + 𝑁/2.
➢ For large 𝑁, the computation is ~half of that required to evaluate 𝑥[𝑛] directly.
➢ Further reductions can be obtained if we split 𝑋𝑒[𝑘] and 𝑋𝑜[𝑘] again.
Fast Fourier transform
(cont.)
B
i
t
r
e
v
e
r
s
a
l