Notes
Notes
of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Original article:
Age estimation from cranial sutures – a Postmortem study
Dr. S. V. Khandare *, Dr. S.S.Bhise **, Dr A. B. Shinde ***
* Asst. Professor, Forensic Medicine Dept. , B.J. medical college, Pune , India
** Asst. Professor, Forensic Medicine Dept.. Grant Govt. medical college, Mumbai. India
*** Asst. Professor, Forensic Medicine , Dept. B.J. medical college, Pune , India
Corresponding author: Dr S V Khandare
Abstract:
Age estimation is an integral part of the biological profile employed by forensic anthropologists in order to
assist in achieving an identification of an unknown deceased individual. Its estimation is of paramount
importance and requires special attention in cases where bodies are found in decomposed, mutilated state or
only fragmentary remains are discovered. After 25 years of age, other scientific methods like tooth microscopy,
Gustafson’s method (applicable to dead persons only), study of union of parts of sternum, lipping of joints and
closure of cranial sutures are considered for age estimation of the individual. The oldest and most controversial
age indicator is cranial suture closure. Cranial sutures generally fuse with increasing age, although there is
considerable variability in closure rates and patterns.11
The present study has been done on post-mortem cases referred to Government hospital, Mumbai which is a
tertiary referral centre. It becomes difficult to determine age in middle and older age groups and as Very few
studies have been conducted on cranial suture closure of Mumbai region subjects we decided to do study on
suture closure by actually viewing the stage of closure of suture of autopsy dead body, to see the actual fusion
and its correlation with age and to compare with the documented present studies. Present study reveal that
Ectocranial obliteration of the various segments of the three main sutures of the skull is so inconclusive that
neither does it help in estimating the age of the deceased nor does it provide any supportive evidence in
determining the age of skeletal remain. Age was determined on the basis of endocranial suture fusion. It was
found that almost Complete closure of Sagittal suture occurs at the age of 61 to 65 yrs, almost Complete closure
of coronal suture occurs at the age of 56 to 60 yrs, almost Complete closure of lambdoid suture occurs at the age
of 66 to 70 yrs and almost Complete closure of Temporoparietal suture occurs at the age of 66 to 70 yrs.
Keywords: Suture, Sagittal, Coronal, lambdoid, Temporoparietal
Introduction: etc. and even in new born cases when babies get
Identification is recognition of an individual by interchanged.1 Age estimation is an integral part of
means of various physical features and biological the biological profile employed by forensic
parameters, which are unique to each individual. anthropologists in order to assist in achieving an
Question of identification arises in everyday identification of an unknown deceased individual.
medicolegal practice both in civil cases like Its estimation is of paramount importance and
marriage, inheritance, insurance and disputed sex requires special attention in cases where bodies are
etc. and in criminal cases like assault, murder, rape found in decomposed, mutilated state or only
192
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
fragmentary remains are discovered. Age noted that the period of union, for each suture,
estimation can be done in several ways by varied across individuals but followed the general
macroscopic examination of dental development pattern.8 Pommerol identified the following
and eruption, epiphyseal union of long bones, sequence : 1) individuals under 35 years of age had
degeneration of pelvic articular surfaces, sternal rib open cranial sutures; 2) around 40 years, the
ends, and cranial sutures, as well as microscopic sagittal suture begins to close; 3) around 50 years,
1
examination of bone in histological analysis. Since the coronal suture begins to close; and 4) by 65
the bone resists putrefaction and destruction by years or more, the temporal suture has finished
animals, they can lead to the reliable determination closing.
of age, sex, race, stature in decomposed bodies. The research by Todd and Lyon (1924,
Cranial sutures are classified as fibrous joints, 1925a, 1925b, 1925c) was the first new attempt to
meaning that they lack a synovial cavity and the estimate age using endo and ectocranial suture
bones are held together firmly by fibrous closure since Pommerol, Ribbe, Frederic, Parsons
connective tissue. The functions of sutures are (1) and Box, with the specific aim to create a precise
to prevent separation of the bones when external numerical rating system for cranial closure.9 In
forces are applied (e.g., muscle function or trauma), 1981, Patil T.L. et al studied closure of cranial
and (2) to allow some movement to occur between suture of vault of skull in 150 skulls for
2
bones during rapid growth of the cephalic viscera. macroscopic suture closure and observed that
The use of cranial sutures for age estimation has sequence of closure is not constant; it proceeds
always been a matter of considerable debate and its more quickly in endocranial sutures and reaches to
reliability within the parameter has not been higher degree.10 The study by Vyas P.C showed
demonstrated conclusively by various researchers. that closure of sutures although not an appropriate
Only handful of studies has been conducted in indictor of age, yet accuracy in age estimation in
India and data on heterogeneous population of elderly persons can reasonably achieved if other
Mumbai region is virtually non‐existent. indicators of ageing process are taken into
The method of determining age by cranial suture consideration .e.g.‐graying of hair ,wrinkles, arcus
closure has always been more generally used, but senalis , menopause and teeth.11
because the cranium is frequently the best Sahni and colleagues (2005) investigated age
3
preserved portion of the recovered skeleton. assessment from cranial suture closure in a modern
Cranial sutures generally fuse with increasing age, sample of individuals 538 male and 127 female
although there is considerable variability in closure adults of known ages from Northwestern India.
4
rates and patterns. The idea that cranial bones fuse Sagittal,coronal, and lambdoid sutures were studied
progressively with age has been in existence since at autopsy . Sutures were recorded only as “open”
5
at least the 16th century. Since the 16th century or “closed”. Sahni and coworkers found that
this method of age assessment has been studied in obliteration begins earlier in males than in females,
various populations with several methods begins earlier on the endocranial surface and that
4
introduced to produce the most accurate results. In commencement and obliteration is so erratic that it
more recent decades, many studies discussing the is not useful for estimating age.12
lack of accuracy and reliability of various methods In an effort to reduce the subjectivity and
3 6 7
have been published. In 1869, F. Pommerol quantify age estimations from cranial suture
193
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
closure, Kirk (2007) utilized laser technology to complete coronal, sagittal suture & temporoparietal
measure the amount of light reflected off of a suture. Lambdoid suture was studied in‐situ. The
suture joint. A general trend of decreasing calvarium was cleaned of soft tissues which made
measurements with increasing age was the sutures more prominent. Photographs were
11
observed. In 2009, Ullhas Shetty carried out study taken in all cases. The obliteration of the sutures
on 100 cases brought to mortuary of Maulana Azad was ascertained endocranially as well as
College, Delhi, for post-mortem. He concluded that ectocranially. The coronal suture was studied in
ectocranial suture cannot be used for age three parts, sagittal suture in four parts, lambdoid
estimation. Suture obliteration starts earlier on sutures in three parts and temporoparietal suture in
endocranial suture than ectocranial, also suture one part.
closure occurred earlier in males. Commencement Scale for closure: Acsadi‐‐Nemeskeri complex
and complete obliteration of segment or the entire method
suture is so erratic that it is not amenable for 0 = open. There is still little space left between
estimating the age. Metopism was observed in 3 % edges of adjoining bones.
11
cases. 1 = incipient closure. Clearly visible as a
The present study has been done on post-mortem continuous often zigzagging line.
cases referred to mortuary of Department of 2 = closure in process. Line thinner, less zigzags,
Forensic medicine of GGMC & Sir JJ interrupted by complete
hospital,Mumbai which is a tertiary referral centre. Closure
Very few studies have been conducted on cranial 3 = advanced closure. Only pits indicate where the
suture closure of Mumbai region subjects. suture is located (almost complete closure)
Material and Methods: 4 = closed. Even location cannot be recognised.
The study was conducted on cases referred for Abbreviations:
medico‐legal post-mortem examination to the S1: Pars bregmatica (i.e first part) of Sagittal suture
Mortuary of Department of Forensic medicine of S2: Pars verticis (i.e second part) of Sagittal suture
GGMC & Sir JJ hospital, Mumbai which is a S3: Pars obelica(i.e third part) of Sagittal suture
tertiary referral centre. Age was confirmed by S4: Pars lambdicia(i.e fourth part) of Sagittal
documentary evidences like birth certificate, suture
identification cards; ration card, Indoor papers etc. C1: Pars bregmatica(i.e first part) of Coronal
Deceased with nutritional deficiency, skeletal suture
malformation or deformity, Endocrinal disorders, C2: Pars complicate (i.e second part) of Coronal
skeletal,cranial pathology or old healed fracture suture
were excluded from study. For Post-mortem Study C3: Pars pterica (i.e third part) of Coronal suture
100 cases of males of age 25 and above were L1: Pars lambdicia(i.e first part) of Lambdoid
studied. After reflecting the scalp, coronal, sagittal, suture
lambdoid and temporoparietal sutures were studied L2: Pars intermedia (i.e second part) of Lambdoid
by applying Acsadi‐Nemeskeri scale suture
13
ectocranially. For endocranial suture same L3: Pars asterica (i.e third part) of Lambdoid suture
scoring system was applied after removing the
calvaria by craniotome taking due care to include
194
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Discussion:
A correct estimation of age in elderly people is
essential in legal, medical, social and
administrative matters i.e. to fixing of age for
regularization of employment, superannuation,
pension settlements, and senior citizen benefits,
Retierments.1 According to J.B.Mukherjee
‘0’ stage of fusion in second part of Lambdoid estimation of age from suture closure of skull can
suture (FM/223/12, 30yrs Male) be given in a range of 5-10 yrs in age of 30-60 yrs,
Results: the range may even be more in higher age groups.1
As endocranial suture fusion is stable, Also according to Reddy estimation of age from
speedy,uniform and complete, it was taken into suture closure of skull can be given only in a range
consideration for age estimation. Sagittal suture of decades.14 In our study range has been given in
starts fusing in between 25-30 yrs and almost range of 5yrs.
Complete closure of Sagittal suture occurs at the The worker who has studied the autopsy specimen
age of 61 to 65 yrs. Coronal suture starts fusing in for study of process of ossification and suture
between 25-30 yrs and almost Complete closure of fusion like Krogman(1978), Rentoul & Smith
coronal suture occurs at the age of 56 to 60 yrs. (1973) , T L Patil (1981) & Robert Shapiro (1960),
Lambdoid suture starts fusing in between 25-30 yrs has concluded that the study of ectocranial fusion is
and almost Complete closure of lambdoid suture less significant than endocranial fusion because
occurs at the age of 66 to 70 yrs. suture along the outer table are more or less
serrated while at inner table they are comparatively
straight, whereas the process is speedy and more
uniform and complete in the endocranial surface.9 15
10 16
Medworld asia
www.medworldasia.com
195
www.ijhbr.com
www.ijhbr.com
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Table A1:
Sagittal Suture
S1 S2 S3 S4
In our present study we found that the sagittal reported by Ulhas shetty (2006) ( sagittal suture
suture, endocranially, starts fusing at the end of 26 closure at the age of 60-69 years) while it is in
yrs and completion is perfected at the age of 61‐65 contrast to the observation reported by Pommerol
yrs in Ist part of sagittal suture, 46-50 yrs in IInd (1869), and Topinard (1885), who indicated
part of sagittal suture, 41-45 yrs in IIIrd part of endocranial commencement of sagittal suture at a
sagittal suture and 26-30 yrs in IVth part of sagittal much later age at about 40 years. These latter
(Table A1)
suture. This observation conforms with that workers have reported on very few specimens so it
reported by Todd & Lyon (1924) and with that can’t be considered as authentic.8, 11
196
193
wwww.ijhbr.com
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Table A2:
Coronal suture
C1 C2 C3
In our present study we found that endocranial (2000) reported endocranial closure between 46-50
fusion of coronal suture was observed as early as for males & 56-60 for females .Table A5
As per
25‐30 years and completion by the age of 56- Schmidt & Modi complete closure occurs in
60years in Ist part of coronal suture, 51-55yrs in between 40-60 yrs while as per krishan vij lower
IInd part of coronal suture & 36-40yrs in IIIrd part half closes first in between 40-50 yrs followed by
of coronal suture.(Table A2) Workers like Pommerol upper half which closes in between 50-60yrs. TableA5,
17, 18
(1869), Topinard (1885), Ribbe (1885) reported According to Ramachandran lower half closes
closure between 40‐50 years.11 Their study does not first in between 40-60 yrs followed by upper half
indicate whether it was ectocranial or endocranial which closes in between 50-60yrs.19
or it was commencement or termination. Moondra
197
193
www.ijhbr.com
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Table A3:
Lambdoid suture
L1 L2 L3
In our present Study Lambdoid suture occurs in between 50-70 yrs.17 20 As per Moondra
endocranially, starts fusing at the age of 25‐30 yrs endocranial closure occurs above 60 yrs both for
Table A5
in the present context which shows that it is a year male and females . According to
earlier than that reported by Todd and Lyon (1924), J.B.Mukherjee lambdoid suture closes at the age
while completion in our study is 66-70yrs in Ist group of 45-55yrs. 1
part of lambdoid suture, 56-60yrs in IInd part of According to P.C. Vyas lambdoid suture closes at
lambdoid suture & 41-45yrs in IIIrd part of the age group of 60yrs.11 The other workers have
lambdoid suture,(Table A3)
which corroborates with not reported on lambdoid suture
Modi & parikh according to whom complete cloure
198
193
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
www.ijhbr.com
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Table A4:
Temporoparietal suture
Ectocranialy >70
(Age group in yrs)
Endocranially 66-70
(Age group in yrs)
In our present study we have found that suture closes at and after 70 yrs which positively
Temporoparietal suture, endocranially, starts fusing corroborates with our present study.21 As per
at the end of 56‐60 years and almost complete Reddy (2010) Temporoparietal suture closes at the
closure is perfected at the age of 66-70 years. . (Table
age of 80 yrs. 1
A4)
As per Apurba Nandy (1995) Temporoparietal
Todd and Lyon, Hrdlicka’s and Reddy have shown Some workers including Singer & Mckern and
that skull sutures closed earlier on the endocranial Stewart have stated unequivocally that suture
8 22 14
surface than the ectocranial. In our present closure is unreliable as a guide to the age of a
study we also found that endocranial surface skull.6 11 Present studies reveal that obliteration of
closure occurs earlier than the ectocranial except in the various segments of the three main sutures of
few sutures like third part of lambdoid suture the skull is so inconclusive that neither does it help
endocrinally. However in these sutures sample size in estimating the age of the deceased nor does it
was very small to draw conclusion. provide any supportive evidence in determining the
age of skeletal remain.
199
193
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
www.ijhbr.com
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
Table A5:
Sr Author/Worker Sagittal Coronal lambdoid Temporo
no parietal
193
200
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
60
60‐69 40‐49 40 49
ENDO
References:
1. Mukherjee JB.Identification.In:Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology.3rd ed.Karmakar
RN.Academic publishers Kolkata.2007.p.156-157.
2. Bennett KA. Craniostenosis: a review of the etiology and a report of new cases. American journal of Physical
Anthropology.1967; 21:1-9.
3. Brooks ST. Skeletal age at death: Reliability of cranial and pubic age indicators. American journal of
Physical Anthropology.1955;13:567-597.
201
194
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072
International J. of Healthcare and Biomedical Research, Volume: 03, Issue: 03, April 2015, Pages 192-202
4. Masset C. Age estimation on the basis of cranial sutures.In: Age Markers in the Human Skeleton.1st ed. Işcan
MY. Springfield, Thomas CC.1989.p.71-103.
5. White TD.Skull.In: Human Osteology.2nd ed. San Diego. Academic Press. California. 2000.p.55.
6. R.Singer. Estimation of age from cranial suture closure:A report of its unreliability. Journal of Forensic
Medicine.1953;1:52‐59.
7. Hershkowitz I, Latimer B ,Dutour O,Jellema L M, Wish‐Bartaz S, Rothschild C,et al. Why do we fail in aging
the skull from the sagittal suture? American journal of Physical Anthropology.1997 Jul; 103(3): 393‐399.
8. Todd TW,Lyon DW. Endocranial suture closure, its progress and age relationship: Part I adult males of the
white stock. American journal of Physical Anthropology.1924;7:325-384.
9. Krogman WM.Skeletal age:later age.In:The human skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 3rd ed. Thomas
CC.U.S.A.1978.p.76-91.
10. Patil TL,Bhargava ,Qureshi, A.A. The study of cranial suture closure of the vault. Journal of the Anatomical
Society of India.1981;2:30-38.
11. Shetty U. Macroscopic study of cranial suture closure at autopsy for estimation of age. Anil Aggrawal's
Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. 2009 july;10(2).Available
from:http://www.anilaggrawal.com/ij/vol-010-no-002/main.htm.
12. Sahni D, Jit I, Neelam , Sanjeev. Time of closure of cranial sutures in North‐West Indian adults. Forensic
Science International.2005 Mar;148(2):199‐205.
13. Acsady G, Nemeskeri J.In: History of human life span and mortality.Ist ed. Akademiai Kiado.1970.p.311-
332.
14. Reddy KSN.Identification.In:The Essentials of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology.29th ed. Devi KS.
2010.P.72.
15. Rentoul E,Smith H.In: Glaister`s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology:13th ed. Churchill
Livingstone.London.1973.p.80.
st
16. Shapiro R, Janzen HA. A roentgen study on the normal skull.In: The normal skull.I ed Paul B
hoeber.1960.p.161.
17.Modi J.Personal identity.In:Modi’s medical jurisprudence and toxicology.23rded.Mathiharan K,Patnaik
KA.Lexis nexis.2010.p.287.
18. Vij K.Identification.Identification.In:Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology Principles and
Practises.4th ed. Elsevier.2008.P.50‐58.
19. Ramachandran C. Medico-legal Radiological age determination.In:Skeletal Anatomy.1st ed. Paras Medical
Publishers.Hyderabad.2003.p.15-96.
20. Parikh.Personal identity.In: Parikh’s Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence,Forensic medicine and
Toxicology.5 th ed. CBS.1990.p.39-50.
21. Nandy A.Identification of individual.In:Principles of Forensic Medicine including Toxicology .3rd ed.New
central book agency (p) ltd, Kolkata.2010.132-138.
22. Hrdlicka A. Estimation of age.In: Hrdlicka’s practical anthropometry.4th ed.Stewart TD. wistar institute of
anatomy and biology.philadelphia.1952.p.54.
202
193
www.ijhbr.com ISSN: 2319-7072