CIPS L4M1 - Guide
CIPS L4M1 - Guide
L4M1 Sample Questions V2 Sep 2023 Leading global excellence in procurement and supply
(Q1) INFONT Logistics International Ltd
INFONT is a reputable logistics company with headquarters at its multimillion-dollar distribution centre
located just ten miles from the country’s main seaport. The port handles all bulk imports and exports of its
clients. INFONT also owns two warehouses within the country and has contracted an agent in each of the
other five countries in the region. The services INFONT provides to its clients include warehousing, packaging
and transportation of their finished products or production materials. It owns and operates transport vehicles,
folk lift trucks and other material handling equipment (MHE). INFONT uses 10% of its warehouse space for its
maintenance, repair and operational (MRO) requirements such as oils and tyres for the vehicles; pallets and
plastic sheets for repacking split deliveries to clients; etc. In order to maintain the high level of service to its
clients, a substantial part of the operating expenditure budget is allocated to staff and consultancy expenses.
In addition, significant capital expenditure is also spent on a range of storage and handling equipment,
vehicles and IT infrastructure. INFONT’s agents are contractually required to maintain the same level of space
for their MRO requirements.
Some well-known retailers and manufacturers are loyal clients, and they rely on INFONT’s high quality
logistics services for their own successful competition in the market. INFONT’s business had been stable and
growing prior to year 1.
Extracts from the Financial Statements and Budgets: INFONT Logistics International Ltd
Year 1 $000 Year 2 $000 Next Year (Plan) $000
Turnover 33400 32800 30000
Gross Profit 9350 9840 9000
Operating Expenditure 4010 4920 6500
Capital Expenditure 1110 2060 9850
However, due to concerns over deteriorating agency service levels, INFONT has decided that next year it will
not renew the contract with its agent in the neighbouring country. Instead, it will purchase and directly
operate its own warehouse in that country. This is a major decision that will require a complex analysis of
INFONT’s budget which involves many categories of spend to be considered in acquiring and operating the
new warehousing facility.
Question 1
Describe FIVE distinctive features of capital purchases, using examples from INFONT scenario.
[25 marks]
LO: 1
AC: 1.3
Command Words
It is important in any constructive response question to understand the Command word used in the question
as they tell you exactly what the assessor wants you to do.
2
The Command word in this question is Describe: to give a full account or detailed representation of
something.
It is important to note at this point that the assessor will give you marks for describing only FIVE distinctive
features of capital purchases using examples from the stated scenario.
If you identify and then describe more than FIVE, following on from your introduction, you will not gain any
additional marks and will also have wasted valuable time, only the first FIVE will be marked.
To be absolutely clear, any more than FIVE distinctive features of capital purchases identified and described
using examples from the scenario will be left unmarked.
If you describe less than FIVE, then you cannot accrue full marks even though you might describe three or four
distinctive features in perhaps too much breadth and depth.
Therefore, you need to time manage your planned answer to ensure you identify and describe FIVE
distinctive features of capital purchases, using examples from the INFONT scenario and no more in the time
allocated.
Note: This question has 25 marks and therefore 5 marks for each feature identified and described.
A good approach to answering this question would be to have a short introductory paragraph providing a
brief description and/or definition/overview of capital purchases in general.
Following on from the introduction, perhaps have a short sub-heading ‘Five Distinctive Features of Capital
Purchases from the INFONT scenario’, and then bullet point each of the identified FIVE features with a good
description, account and representation for each. This approach helps to ensure that you understand the
question, recognise the command word and cover FIVE, and no more, identified features from the scenario.
Relevant answers from the INFONT scenario could include but are not limited to the following content:
Distinctive features of capital purchases, using examples from INFONT scenario may include.
• Price is only one element, and sometimes not the most important one. If for instance INFONT plans to
acquire a specialised material handling equipment (MHE) for the new warehouse, then the main
consideration will be the whole-life costs, which includes other costs like installation, maintenance,
operating cost, down time, and end-of-life.
3
• The monetary value of assets such as INFONT’s new distribution centre will be very high. Its
procurement process will generally require specialised investment techniques, evaluation and control,
asset maintenance, etc. It also involves procurement and financing considerations such as purchase,
lease, hire, acquisition, joint venture, etc.
• Negotiations can be complex and extended due to the complexity of the ‘package’ of benefits being
sought over the asset’s lifecycle.
• A team approach is needed in which contributions of other departments and other stakeholders must
be effectively coordinated and managed, usually by procurement. Given the very high level of
investments required, these stakeholders will not only include the user groups but finance and legal
departments.
• Capital purchases tend to be unique or non-recurring, without similar recent purchases on which to
base the present procurement decisions. Each new acquisition must be evaluated afresh.
• Specifications are difficult to draft due to their uniqueness and technical complexity, which usually
involve elements of service such as research, installation, training, after-sales service, etc.
• Benefits to be obtained from the procurement are often difficult to evaluate and quantify in monetary
terms. Investment evaluation techniques will usually need to be utilised in evaluating the long-term
costs and benefits of capital purchases.
• The capital assets that INFONT are procuring such as the warehouse, storage & handling equipment,
vehicles, and the additional IT infrastructure required will be used to support the business and
business growth over a long period of time. These acquisitions will be accounted for and depreciated
over a number of years; plant and equipment usually over four or five years but the IT infrastructure
and buildings can be much longer.
• The Capital Expenditure in year one is $1,110 million, in year two $2,060 million and is planned to be
$9,850 million in the next year. This is a huge increase and unlikely to be fully funded from annual
profits or even financial reserves, and INFONT may need to fund the investment from other sources
which may include bank loans, involving both cost and risk over time.
• Given the complexity and lengthy timescale of different capital purchases, formal contracts for each
of the different capital spends will need to be developed. For example, IT infrastructure will need
Service Level Agreements that include ‘uptime’ guarantees, risk mitigation and recognise any relevant
GDPR legislation, such as the UK Data Protection Act 2018. Purchasing a warehouse will take a
significant amount of time, effort and resource by a number of stakeholders to include not only
Finance but specialised and knowledgeable legal support.
• Trucks, and material handling equipment may require spares agreements to ensure that they are
available and can operate 7x24 over the agreed periods.
• This very high level of capital spend planned in the one year is business critical to INFONT as most of
the costs will be irreversible once set in motion and the investments will need to generate sustainable
4
profits over the longer term, recognising the current levels of profit being generated both currently
and forecasted. (See table)
• For INFONT the capital expenditure also creates a level of uncertainty recognising that costs incurred
are to create future benefits (as we know the future can be impossible to predict). There is no
certainty that the levels of investment will yield the planned benefits as the dynamics of both
business and the wider political and economic environment can change very quickly. For example,
the financial crisis of 2007/8, Brexit and the USA/China trade wars.
Question 2
[8 marks]
LO: 2
AC: 2.1
This is a two-part question and as such you should review the number of marks available for each
section and manage your time accordingly.
Command Words
It is important in any constructive response question to understand the Command word used in the question
as they tell you exactly what the assessor wants you to do. In this question, the assessor will want you to
clearly:
The Command word in this question is Identify; essentially you need to name the stages, accompanied with a
very brief description, separately in number order or by using bullet points. In essence, you need to identify
the generally accepted 8 stages, gaining one point for each stage identified.
• Define business needs and develop the specification – requisition and use of a cross-
functional team and stakeholder engagement
• Market analysis and make or buy decision – spend analysis, competitive analysis, STEEPLED
• Develop the strategy and plan – tender processes, bargaining power
• Pre-procurement market testing and engagement – RFI’s, right time to enter the market
• Develop documentation and detailed specification
5
• Supplier selection to participate in tender – supplier checks, due diligence, performance
evaluation for existing suppliers
• Issue tender documents – ITT, RFQ, clear timescales, specification
• Bid and tender evaluation and validation – whole-life costs, credit checks, award criteria,
negotiation
b) Describe FOUR benefits of using electronic systems to undertake activities within the CIPS Procurement
Cycle.
[17 marks]
LO: 2
AC: 2.3
‘Describe FOUR benefits of using electronic systems to undertake activities within the CIPS Procurement
Cycle.’
The Command word in this question is Describe: to give a full account or detailed representation of
something.
It is important to note at this point that the assessor will give you marks for describing only FOUR benefits of
using electronic systems to undertake activities within the CIPS Procurement Cycle.
If you identify and then describe more than FOUR, following on from your introduction, you will not gain any
additional marks and will also have wasted valuable exam time.
To be absolutely clear, any more than FOUR benefits described will be left unmarked.
If you describe less than FOUR, then you cannot accrue full marks, even though you might describe two or
three benefits in perhaps too much breadth and depth. Therefore, you need to time manage your planned
answer to ensure you identify and describe FOUR benefits, and no more, in the time allocated.
NB: This part question has 17 marks allocated that equates to FOUR points for each benefit described, and a
mark for a brief introduction.
Following on from the introduction, it may then be useful to have a short sub-heading: “Four benefits of using
electronic systems to undertake activities within the CIPS Procurement Cycle”, and then bullet point each of
6
the identified FOUR benefits individually with a good description, account and representation for each of
them. This approach helps to ensure that you understand the question, recognise the command word and
cover FOUR identified benefits.
• Cost saving: There is a significant and potential cost saving in the use of electronic systems which
streamline and speed up processes, minimise inefficient (and potentially inaccurate) manual data and
reduce the number of document handling tasks such as data input and transfer.
• Communication: Improved communication and transparency of information throughout the internal
and external supply chain to support co-ordination and decision making.
• Accuracy: Higher accuracy of data input, manipulation and transfer. Greater data accuracy can
support decision making and well as minimise the risks of errors.
• Responsiveness: Reduced cycle and lead times as electronic systems are generally more responsive.
For example, suppliers may benefit from reduced cycle times for the payment of their invoices.
• Supplier relations: Improved supplier relations and the potential for virtual collaboration and SM.
• Real Time Information: Inventory levels or delivery progress to support planning, decision making and
expediting.
• Fraud Risk: Reduced risk of fraud through fewer cash transactions, less human intervention in
transactions, controlled access to data systems and the automatic identification of incorrect data.
• Traceability: It is much easier to track and trace documentation, who it was sent to, who replied, who
authorized what and when etc. all within digital recording processes.
• International and global sourcing in real time. Electronic systems provide you with the ability to
communicate and source 24x7 on not only a local but global basis.
• Provenance. Transparency throughout the supply chain using Blockchain technology.
(Q3)
Question Three
Explain FIVE reasons why it is important to maintain effective corporate governance standards within the
procurement function.
[25 marks]
LO: 3
AC: 3.1
Command Words
It is important in any constructive response question to understand the Command word used in the question
as this is what the assessor wants you to do. In this question the assessor will want you to clearly:
‘Explain FIVE reasons why it is important to maintain effective corporate governance standards within the
procurement function’.
7
The Command word in this question is Explain: ‘Give reasons for, or account for something so that it is clear
or easy to understand’.
It is important to note at this point that the assessor will give you marks for explaining only FIVE reasons; if
you identify and then explain more than FIVE reasons following on from your introduction, you will not gain
any additional marks and will also have wasted valuable time.
To be absolutely clear, any more than FIVE reasons explained will be left unmarked.
If you explain less than FIVE reasons, then you cannot accrue full marks even though you might explain three
or four reasons in perhaps too much breadth and depth.
Therefore, you need to time manage your planned answer to ensure good explanations of FIVE reasons, and
no more in the time allocated.
Note: This question has 25 marks and therefore 5 marks for each reason explained.
Following on from the introduction, perhaps have a short sub-heading ‘Five Reasons why it is important to
maintain effective corporate governance standards within the procurement function’, and then bullet
point/number each of the identified FIVE reasons with a good explanation for each.
This approach helps to ensure that you understand the question, recognise the command word and cover
FIVE and no more identified reasons.
Relevant answers could include but are not limited to the following content:
• The Procurement function is the custodian of large sums of money and within the private sector for
which profitability is a key objective. Effective ethical procurement, supply chain management
governance policies and procedures contribute significantly toward this.
• If relating to the Public Sector, Procurement professionals have a huge responsibility to the public
they serve and to ensure that value for money is accrued and monies are spent in an effective, ethical,
sustainable and transparent manner.
• In Third Sector (Not-for-Profit) organisations, which are primarily funded by donations and grants,
these entities also have governance throughout their organisation to protect their reputation and to
meet the needs of their many stakeholders. Procurement professionals have a huge responsibility
within this type of organisation, often working in poor regions where bribery, corruption, and
unethical behaviours can often be a higher risk.
• Procurement professionals are faced by many opportunities to commit financial fraud or to misuse
systems or information for personal gain.
• The decisions of procurement professionals typically benefit some suppliers over others, creating an
incentive for suppliers to try and influence those decisions. Meanwhile, it can be difficult to determine
8
wholly objective criteria for deciding between rival suppliers, allowing bias or unfairness to enter the
process.
• Procurement professionals are in a position of trust within a business, with control over potentially
strategic decisions and expenditures, which could impact on the interests of the organisation and its
shareholders. There is a ‘duty of care’ to protect those interests, which may be jeopardised by
unethical conduct.
• Procurement professionals are in a ‘stewardship’ role, responsible for the custodianship of finance
and assets which are owned by other people. Unethical conduct may represent the theft, loss or
damage of assets belonging to the shareholders (or other funders/owners) of the business.
• The standing, credibility, and trust of the profession (and the employing organisation) may be
damaged by fraud and other forms of unethical conduct – and enhanced by ethical conduct. Ethical
standards are an important element in managing reputational risk.
• Supply chain relationships may be damaged by unethical conduct, to the detriment of the buying
organisation – and enhanced by ethical conduct. Ethical procurement practices are an important
element in buyers maintaining ‘good customer’ status with suppliers, and supplier commitment and
loyalty.
• To ensure individuals do not take advantage of the organisation in any unfair or corrupt way that
could result in a personal or professional gain.
• To ensure that there are no conflicts of interest where a person can influence decisions in favour of
their own personal gain. E.g. awarding business to a family member.
• To ensure ethical and sustainable behaviours in procurement and the wider supply chain e.g.
prevention of child labour, slavery, bribery, corruption, to ensure Fair Trade and to protect the
environment.
• To ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
The executive board at Milkshake Press set its new three-year business strategy to “increase economic
viability through profitability by improving effectiveness and efficiency across all business areas”. To help
achieve this, a new head of procurement, Martina Schweer was appointed to ensure that procurement
activities were aligned to the new strategy. Martina arranged a meeting with the procurement team to start
discussions about the strategy but was surprised to learn that the team had not previously considered overall
economic viability beyond negotiating the lowest price with suppliers.
Milkshake Press is a brand of milkshake mix sold in cafes and retail outlets in the United Kingdom and China.
With offices in China and the UK, Milkshake Press directly employs 250 staff and has a procurement team of
eight, three of whom are based in China.
As part of the strategy, Milkshake Press has developed a business plan which focussed on innovation. The
most popular flavours were chocolate, banana, and strawberry. The brand has successfully increased its
market share by 5%, by introducing new flavours like lime and cherry. They also undertook a successful re-
branding exercise which increased their market share in China by 15%.
9
Question Four
Discuss FIVE ways in which the objective of ‘economic viability through profitability’ at Milkshake Press might
impact on its procurement activities.
[25 marks]
LO: 4
AC: 4.3
Command Words
It is important in any constructive response question to understand the Command word used in the question
as they tell you exactly what the assessor wants you to do. In this question, the assessor will want you to
clearly:
‘Discuss FIVE ways in which the objective of ‘economic viability through profitability’ at Milkshake Press might
impact on its procurement activities’.
The Command word in this question is Discuss: to ‘Consider something by writing about it from different
points of view. Compare with, Argue or evaluate’
It is important to note at this point that the assessor will give you marks for discussing only FIVE ways in which
the objective of economic viability might impact on Milkshake Press’ procurement activities.
If you identify and then discuss more than FIVE, following on from your introduction, you will not gain any
additional marks and will also have wasted valuable time.
To be absolutely clear, any more than FIVE ways identified and discussed from the Milkshake Express scenario
will be left unmarked.
If you discuss less than FIVE, then you cannot accrue full marks even though you might identify and discuss
three or four ways in perhaps too much breadth and depth.
Therefore, you need to time manage your planned answer to ensure you identify and discuss FIVE ways
relating to the Milkshake Press scenario, and no more in the time allocated.
Note: This question has 25 marks and therefore 5 marks for each of the ways identified and discussed that
might impact on Milkshake Press’ procurement activities.
A good approach to answering this question would be to have a short introductory paragraph explaining the
importance of profitability and a short definition along the lines of “In the private sector, economic viability
determined by profitability is often a key objective. It is the difference between revenue earned by selling a
product or service, and the cost to produce it. Procurement activities directly impact this equation”.
10
Following on from this short introduction, perhaps have a short sub-heading ‘FIVE Ways in which the
objective of economic viability through profitability at Milkshake Press might impact on its procurement
activities’, and then number or bullet point each of the identified FIVE ways providing a short discussion on
each.
This approach helps to ensure that you understand the question, recognise the command word and cover
FIVE, and no more, identified features from the scenario.
Relevant answers from the Milkshake Press scenario could include but not limited to the following:
Ways in which the objective of ‘economic viability through profitability’ at Milkshake Press might impact on its
procurement activities:
• A pressure to focus on the reduction in expenditure: this makes a direct contribution to profit. It is
often said that a 1% reduction in expenditure will increase profit by 5%. Thus, if buyers can reduce the
amount they spend, they will contribute directly to profit. This can lead procurement to a short-term
approach targeting lowest cost, which contributes to profit in the short term, but in the longer term
may add costs if a lower quality results in increased waste, scrap and reworking.
• Procurement priorities will become those spends where there is more potential to deliver monetary
savings that hit the bottom line, and sourcing projects that can deliver savings quickly.
• This could also lead to procurement taking a more adversarial approach to negotiating to maximise
the “win” for the buying organisation and lead to consideration of transactional supplier relationships
and one-off purchases.
• Procurement risk losing profitability in the longer term through poor/no supplier relationships.
• Alternatively, procurement might increase time and resources spend on analysing and developing
longer strategies to deliver profit through value-added activities Value Analysis (VA) or Value
Engineering (VE), supplier relationship management etc.
• Design specifications: VA and VE are cost-cutting initiatives that reduce costs without reducing
quality. Buyers should contribute to these processes and involve relevant suppliers to add value.
• Waste reduction and value-adding: This has required purchasing to move from a reactive activity
(placing orders) to pro-actively develop new skills to eliminate costs at source.
• A broader view of the traditional buying role: this has resulted in such activities as increasing
participation in the development of requirements and specifications; managing VA activities;
conducting supply market research and managing supplier negotiations.
• Supply Chain Management (SCM) concepts. Adopting SCM concepts has resulted, in many instances,
in a move away from an adversarial approach to the supply market to one of working in a more
collaborative/partnership manner.
• Pay more, save more. The role of purchasing not only in specification formulation but also in supplier
appraisal, supplier selection, and supplier management, ensures quality objectives are achieved and
costs through poor quality and/or non-availability of parts or materials are eliminated or significantly
reduced. This might mean that a higher price is paid but overall value-adding contributes to
profitability.
• Relations with other departments: all functions are integrated, and this has led to initiatives such as
early buyer / early supplier involvement to assist in lowering costs at the early stages of design. Cross-
and multi-functional team working is often used to ensure a balanced outcome.
• Conversely, procurement may experience conflict with internal stakeholders when the drive for cost
reduction might not support, for example, a marketing requirement for a higher quality component or
an over-specified item. Some functions might want to reinvest savings.
11
• Conflict with other objectives – if implementing other service improvements or environmental, social
and governance (ESG) policies will cost the organisation money, the procurement will either avoid
these or spend time assessing the justification and are likely to have to quantify any benefit before
approval to implement.
12