Crafting a comprehensive literature review is an arduous task that demands significant time, effort,

and expertise. This critical component of academic research requires extensive reading, analysis,
synthesis, and writing skills to effectively summarize and evaluate existing literature on a particular
topic.

The complexity of writing a literature review lies in the meticulous process of identifying relevant
sources, critically analyzing their findings, and integrating them coherently to develop a cohesive
narrative. Researchers must navigate through a vast sea of scholarly articles, books, journals, and
other academic publications, carefully selecting those that contribute meaningfully to their research
objectives.

Moreover, synthesizing diverse perspectives, theories, and empirical evidence while maintaining
clarity and coherence poses a considerable challenge. It requires not only a deep understanding of the
subject matter but also the ability to discern key insights, identify gaps in existing knowledge, and
propose avenues for further research.

For many scholars and students, the daunting nature of literature review writing can be
overwhelming, leading to frustration and procrastination. However, seeking professional assistance
can alleviate the burden and ensure the development of a high-quality literature review that meets
academic standards.

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a reliable solution for individuals seeking assistance with literature
review development. With a team of experienced writers proficient in various disciplines, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides customized literature reviews tailored to the specific requirements of each
client. By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time, reduce stress,
and enhance the quality of your research output.

Whether you're a graduate student embarking on a thesis or dissertation, a researcher preparing a

manuscript for publication, or an academic striving to strengthen your scholarly work, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner in literature review development. Order now and experience
the convenience and professionalism of our services.
Read also about harvard format - popular style used in papers. The changed search string was
represented that previously defined in the SLR protocol. To inform your methodological choices and
help you source tried and tested questionnaires (for interviews ) and measurement instruments (for
surveys ). Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a
clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify
and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that
are included in the review. It should not feel like a glorified annotated bibliography. ( ). It will take
time to read, reread, annotate, and start to see connections beween sources. The same conclusion to
analytics is an essential dimension for developing a maturity model for the AI domain. What other
sections you include in the body is up to you. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key
debates that have shaped the direction of the field. If you want to work smart, you don't want to
miss this. Such an approach would indicate a flawed methodology because EFA and CFA should not
be conducted on the same sample. The maturity model that does not capture all the relevant
dimensions in its structure will not reflect the current AI capability situation. You should chase down
and use the reference if the reference author links to another source whose thoughts are relevant or
fascinating. In other words, a complete understanding the research problem requires you to
deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have changed over time. Best practice is to
number them based on the chapter (Table 2.1, Table 2.2 while in Chapter 2). But it can be feasibly
done through following a structured approach to data collection and analysis. First, there are the
primary studies that researchers conduct and publish. In qualitative reviews (reviews synthesising
results of qualitative studies), this information is beneficial for readers to recognise the underlying
philosophical and paradigmatic stance of the authors of the included articles. A literature review
does not demonstrate what you know but what you have learned from your analysis of the topic or
field. It should summarize the whole text, not just introduce it. In a literature review it is best to
build a case with selected sources by grouping them thematically so that you can analyze, compare
and contrast the theories, and that policies and practices in the field you are studying or conveyed in
an organized way. Which points do the researchers agree (and disagree) on. They come together to
make a unified sound (synthesis). It should not feel like a glorified annotated bibliography. ( ). The
goal is to more comprehensively understand a particular phenomenon. Furthermore, six out of 13
studies (46%) on AI maturity pertain to assess the technology aspect, even in specific domains. Table
5 reveals that the AIMM has different designs regarding the number of levels, descriptors, and
elements. We have outlined five tips that could enhance the quality of the data extraction and
synthesis process by developing useful literature summaries. A literature review creates a
“landscape” for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the field.
We also provide examples from our published reviews to illustrate how useful literature summary
tables can be developed and what sort of information should be provided.
Various studies related to AIMM were conducted with different objectives. The only difference here
between a “chronological” and a “thematic” approach is what is emphasized the most: the
development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology.But more authentic thematic reviews tend to
break away from chronological order. Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a
single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write: Current
Situation: Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review.
Provide the foundation for your conceptual framework (if you have one) Inform your own
methodology and research design. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of
the literature review. This will give you a chance to take your mind off it and then get back to
proofreading with a fresh perspective. Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses;
make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. Even when paraphrasing an
author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes to Avoid These
are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. Include a running
head in the top right corner of each page in your paper. Researchers can utilize the study results as a
basic and inspiration for their own future research efforts. Many recent critical appraisal checklists
(eg, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) discourage review authors from assigning a quality score and
recommend noting the main strengths and limitations of included studies. Every writer holds a
degree and knows authoritative literature in their subject. You’ll invariably end up wasting huge
amounts of time re-writing and re-shaping, or you’ll just land up with a disjointed, hard-to-digest
mess. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared
informally among scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the
field. A summary is always much shorter than the original text. To help you develop a big-picture
view and synthesise all the information, you might find mind mapping software such as Freemind
useful. You are a high schooler who deals with a literature review for the first time. For instance, in
the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material
in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and
results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions
in scholarship. This is because they developed an instrument to evaluate the AI bias governance in a
project through two stages: Design and Development and Post Development. Furthermore, they
provide information on which researchers are active in specific fields, which can be useful for
tracking down their other work. Once you’re satisfied that you have digested and distilled all the
relevant literature in your mind, it’s time to put pen to paper (or rather, fingers to keyboard). Instead,
it focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer. Typically, a literature review is a part of a
larger paper, such as a thesis or dissertation. Evaluate sources. Identify themes, debates and gaps.
Summarize and synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each
paragraph as well as throughout the review. GIFs Highlight your latest work via email or social
media with custom GIFs. If the text is a scientific paper that follows a standard empirical structure, it
is probably already organized into clearly marked sections, usually including an introduction,
methods, results, and discussion. Lit reviews can take many different organizational patterns
depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review. With Visa and Mastercard checkout
options, your payments for service are out of danger. Based on these results, the authors conclude
that an apple a day does not keep the doctor away, but it may keep the pharmacist away.
Sources not directly cited in the Lit Review should not be listed in the Works Cited list. We refer to
conceptual contribution as a description of how the article’s key results contribute towards the
development of potential codes, themes or subthemes, or emerging patterns that are reported as the
review findings. Naturally, you won’t always follow the plan to the letter, but without a detailed
outline, you’re more than likely going to end up with a disjointed pile of waffle, and then you’re
going to spend a far greater amount of time re-writing, hacking and patching. A literature review is a
document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources
in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). For this reason, I will speak to the literature
review, revealing tips and tricks relating to it, in three different posts. The exact format depends on
your citation style, but it usually includes an in-text citation and a full reference at the end of your
paper. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as mentioned at
the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all situations). Unless one
wants to reinvent the wheel, precise awareness on the extent of wisdom on a subject is necessary to
carry on research that adds value to the field. The analysis included two parts: AI basics and AI fields
of application. Although the author included the “superintelligence enterprise” level as the highest
maturity level, he indicated that it is difficult to reach this level at present. Validity -- are the author's
arguments and conclusions convincing. The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic
writing - try for free. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems are constantly
changing according to the latest studies. A literature review allows you to highlight essential ideas
and methodologies while also highlighting gaps in whatever research currently exists because it
provides an overview of existing research. Well, the literature research gap is the missing or
incomplete piece of data in the literature, which has not been explor. The “experiential” part of the
rubric does not mean that you must bring in your experience and voice throughout the work, but
rather provide context to the topic, mainly in the introduction. There is an increasing interest in the
visual aspects of social media. Given that you are presenting what the literature says about a field of
study, not what you think or believe, you must cite those authors that actually make and provide the
research evidence, theories, frameworks for practice etc. Student Orientation 2014 Margaret Hanson,
PhD Professor of Physics Associate University Dean The Graduate School. You cannot categorize
the information provided by electronic sources, but here are some tips for using them: 1)
acknowledge that anyone can post information on the Internet, so the quality may vary, and 2)
information posted on the web for general audiences may not be appropriate data for your Lit
Review (general audiences tend to need less detail and scholarly information). In addition,
“maturity” is a widespread word, and many studies use it as it is generalizable across many domains.
Experts make accurate citations, use current books, and derive conclusions from them. Buy
Dissertation Online lit review pay someone to write a literature review is an important genre in many
disciplines, not just literature (the study of works of buy scientific literature review what can a
literature review do for me literature such as what can a literature review do for me novels and
plays). As you read and evaluate your literature there are several different ways to organize your
research. Thus, the business that invests in AI implementation ensures long-period survival and
improved performance, while the others will be eliminated in the near future ( Lamberti et al., 2019
). Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for
example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically). It
seems that this result usual and dominates the maturity models literature ( Wendler, 2012 ).
Methodological: A methodological approach differs from the two above in that the focusing factor
usually does not have to do with the content of the material. As the author, you want to leave the
readers' trail of thought within the actual essay topic. What flaws do you believe should be addressed
in your paper.
Announcements. Please sign in. You must register for the course to receive PAC. Then tighten it up
and submit it to your supervisor. Table of contents Why write a literature review, examples of
literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3:
identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write
your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction. The data
quality links to the credibility of the study, so it is important to note, especially in this day of
predatory journals where not all articles found are credible. Conducting Research Literature
Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris.
International Journal of Electronic Governance 10 ( 4 ): 423 - 439. Sometimes, the main idea will
just glare from a piece of literature. Your contribution is to organize the concepts from the sources
into a coherent argument or narrative that incorporates your views. Seven (47%) out of 15 studies
validated the design model, indicating that many AIMMs lack validation of their structure and
applicability. February 4, 2023 17 min read Share the article As every student knows, writing
informative essay and research papers is an integral part of the educational program. Because all of
the research articles you are incorporating into your literature review are related to your topic, it is
likely that they have similar study designs and have measured similar dependent variables. Maybe
you’re on the verge of getting a doctorate and want a literature review to be just ideal. In: Industrial
AI. Singapore: Springer. 119 - 159. Often this form is used to help establish a lack of appropriate
theories or reveal that current theories are inadequate for explaining new or emerging research
problems. The unit of analysis can focus on a theoretical concept or a whole theory or framework.
Avoid making uncited or overly generalized claims. If you feel a generalization is warranted, you
must follow it up with multiple, specific examples to justify such generalization. Finally, the
comparative approach provides a comparison within an organization among a series of organizations.
Source: Overview: This systematic review included 72 studies of food naturalness to explore trends
in the literature about its importance for consumers. You should always look at examples from your
own discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your
discipline’s conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre. You will often see the
terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. Thus, the
business that invests in AI implementation ensures long-period survival and improved performance,
while the others will be eliminated in the near future ( Lamberti et al., 2019 ). If your assignment is
not very specific, seek clarification from your instructor: Roughly how many sources should you
include. According to the topology, three studies followed Likert-like questionnaires as part of a
quantitative approach. The number of studies initially retrieved and selected in the databases and
Google Scholar are shown in Table 3. Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text Be assured
that you'll submit flawless writing. If applicable: define how your own study will contribute to
further disclosure of the topic. You can do this by assessing the citation count of any given article in
Google Scholar. If you are worried about whether you are conducting a complete search of all the
literature or not, make an appointment with your Faculty Librarian who can show you some very
useful tips on how to modify your searches so that you waste less time, get more effective results
and overall, cause less frustration for yourself. Magazines aimed at a wide audience, such as Time,
Us, and National Enquirer, will not provide you with the information you require. Systematic Review
Examples This type of literature review is more structured and rigorous than a narrative review. We
believe that using AIMMs across various organizations will be beneficial, particularly for
benchmarking AI capabilities.
It’s achievable with writers who have gained a PhD themselves. Quality control service experts
additionally assure that your writing requirements are followed. Only include the most relevant and
most important sources. Their need stems from the ever-increasing output of scientific publications.
Definition: A list of citations on a particular topic followed by an evaluation of the source’s argument
and other relevant material including its intended audience, sources of evidence, and methodology
Explore your topic. Next four paragraphs described the contents and purpose of each section of the
thesis. However, I am thoroughly satisfied with the work of expert. During the evaluation stage, you
are making judgements on the themes presented in the research articles that you have read. The
analysis demonstrates empirical validations of the models are scarce. Finally, “Conclusions”
summarized the outcomes of this review. That’s why you have no more reason for fear of cyber
attacks. The majority of the studies’ research objectives of AIMM focused on maturity model
development, followed by validations. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and
synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Given this,
the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution to
understanding the research problem being studied. Or it might trace the intellectual progression of
the field, including major debates. There are many situations in which you might have to summarize
an article or other source: As a stand-alone assignment to show you’ve understood the material To
keep notes that will help you remember what you’ve read To give an overview of other researchers’
work in a literature review When you’re writing an academic text like an essay, research paper, or
dissertation, you’ll integrate sources in a variety of ways. Now what is the most effective way of
presenting the information. Synthesis describes combining separate components or elements to form
a connected whole. History: The chronological progression of the field, the research literature, or an
idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not
already a chronology. Cite the source with an in-text citation and a full reference so your reader can
easily find the original text. London: Pearson. You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you
use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill Make a Gift The Sheridan Libraries Write a Literature Review Sheridan Libraries Find
This link opens in a new window Evaluate This link opens in a new window Not every source you
found should be included in your annotated bibliography or lit review. Some important questions to
ask yourself are: What answers does the existing research provide to my own research questions.
Really helpful, Thank you for the effort in showing such information This is super helpful thank you
very much. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. Be Selective
Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. Research Project
Steps: The Problem Statement in Quantitative Research Specify the variables and the population of
interest. Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. The library also runs classes on
how to improve your literature searching strategy if you would first want to rather try that.
Paraphrasing Use your own words, and do not copy and paste the abstract The library's tutorials
about plagiarism are excellent, and will help you with paraphasing correctly Annotated Bibliographies
Annotated bibliographies can help you clearly see and understand the research before diving into
organizing and writing your literature review. Each part of this sheet contains details that would
answer a specific research question.