Competency GAP Analysis
Competency GAP Analysis
Competency GAP Analysis
INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 OVERVIEW
Since their introduction two decades ago, competency models and competency-based
Human Resource Management have become the best practice of business focused HR processes
for thousands of businesses. Competencies have stood the test of time and are now required for
organizations seeking to integrate their HR practices with the strategic and operational needs of
business.
1
An analysis of the definition reveals:
Competencies are the characteristics of a manager. This goes along with our premise that
competency is a characteristic of a person.
Competencies lead to the demonstration of skills and abilities. Therefore, competency
must be demonstrated and hence must be observable. It must not be inferred or extrapolated.
Competencies must lead to effective performance. This means that the performance of a
person with competency must be significantly better than that of a person without it.
Competency thus refers to behavior, differentiating success from merely doing the job.
Competency also embodies the capacity to transfer skills and abilities from one area to
another. A sales person may be able to deliver his sales pitch flawlessly but may be tongue-
tied elsewhere. He lacks the competency of ‘communication’. Thus competencies cannot be
restricted to a single job alone but the person must be able to carry them along. This dispels
the need to differentiate between generic and functional competencies since this part of the
definition excludes functional competence, which is associated with a particular job.
Broadly defined, competencies are actions which are observable in the execution
of an individual’s work, characterizing effective performance in the work.
2
COMPETENCE COMPETENCIES
The above competencies can be described further by Behavioral Indicators which are
observable behaviors or actions, defining a particular competency, related to a specific role in an
organization.
3
Competency: Positions a new project introduction so that it is clearly differentiated in the
market.
Today organizations are all talking in terms of competence. Gone are the days when
people used to talk in terms of skill sets, which would make their organizations competitive.
There has been a shift in the focus of the organizations. Now they believe in excelling and not
competing. It is better to build a core competency that will see them through crisis. And what
other way than to develop the people, for human resource is the most valuable resource any
organization has.
The product of competency mapping would be “a competency model which is a descriptive set
of predefined key competencies and proficiency levels required to perform successfully in a
specific job”.
4
2. Role Competency Mapping:
- Mapping based on the part an individual employee plays in the organization’s overall
success.
The process of competency mapping does not fit the one-size-fits all formula. It has
to be specific to the user organization. Hence, an organization needs to create a model that
reflects its own strategy, its own market, its own customers, and the competencies that bring
success in that specific context (including national culture).
5
1.1.6. HOW ARE COMPETENCY-BASED PRACTICES USEFUL?
Identify performance criteria to improve the accuracy and ease of the hiring
and selection process.
Provide more objective performance standards.
Clarify standards of excellence for easier communication of performance
expectations to direct reports.
Provide a clear foundation for dialogue to occur between the manager and
employee about performance, development, and career-related issues.
6
For Employees, competency-based practices:
7
1.2. COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT
After indenting the job responsibilities & competency requirements,one should go for
assessing where do individuals stand in terms of the competencies required, which is known
as Competency Assessment
Heritage lays emphasis on working with competent people to achieve results efficiently
and effectively. With this view from the inception, the company has formulated its own
competency matrix. Heritage is interested to know the current competency level of its
departments with respect to the managers and to know the importance of various competencies
in performing their job.
To determine the current competency level of its departments with respect to the
managers and to know the importance of various competencies in performing their job.
8
1.5. OBJECTIVES
This research was carried out to identify the current competency level in all departments
and to know the importance of various competencies in performing their job. The study of
competency mapping and assessment covers all L5 level employees i.e. managers in all
departments. The study currently focuses on 31 managers present in Corporate Office. The
study serves a number of purposes. It is done for the following functions:
Gap Analysis
Role Clarity
Selection, Potential Identification, Growth Plans.
Succession Planning.
Restructuring
Inventory of competencies for future planning
TIME FRAME
The study with its specific objectives was carried out from 24 Feb 2024 to 20th April
2024.
9
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
10
CHAPTER-2
ORGANISATION PROFILE
Started in the year 1984, Suguna Poultry Farm Limited is India’s largest poultry
enterprise with a turnover of 2030 crores in 2007-08. Suguna’s pioneering efforts in
contract Farming have helped thousands of farmers to grow along with the company.
Managing Director Mr. B.Soundararajan and Joint Managing Director
Mr. G.B. Sundararajan head the group.
11
Suguna in Broiler Production
Suguna has become the household name in the broiler
chicken industry. Suguna stands first in broiler
production in India (and 4th in the world by volume).
Suguna Poultry Farm revolutionized the Indian
poultry industry through contract farming. Suguna
Chicken, is a highly trusted brand name offering high
quality, nutritious, hygienic and affordable broiler
chicken.
Fact sheet
The facts and figures of Suguna, as of today indicate its growth and its reach.
Any underlying characteristic required for performing a given task, activity or role
successfully can be considered as competency. Competency may take the following
forms:
Knowledge
Attitude
Skill
Other characteristics of an individual including
Motives
Values
Traits
Self Concept
DEFINITION:
UNIDO (2002)-
A Competency is a set of skills, related knowledge and attributes that allow an
individual to successfully perform a task or an activity within a specific function or
job.
RANKIN (2002):
“Competencies are definition of skills and behaviors that organizations expect their
staff to practice in work.”
MANSFIELD (1997):
“Underlying characteristics of a person that results in effective a superior
performance.”
WOODRUFFE (1991):
ALBANESE(1989) :
Competencies are personal characteristics that contribute to effective
managerial
performance.
HAYES(1979) :
• Generic Competencies
Competencies which are considered essential for all employees regardless of their
function or level. - Communication, initiative, listening etc.These are basic
competencies required to do the job, which do not differentiate between high and low
performers
• Managerial Competencies
Competencies which are considered essential for employees with managerial or
supervisory responsibility in any functional area including directors and senior posts
Threshold or Performance:
Performance competencies are those that differentiate between high and low
performers.
In that regard, John Flanagan’s work (1954) and Dave McClelland’s studies
(1970) might be cited as two landmark efforts that originally invented the concept of
competency. Concept maps were invented by Joseph Novak in the 1960s for use as a
teaching tool. Later in 1986 William Trochim developed the concept map into a
strategic planning tool for use in the design of organizational components. Trochim's
technique differs significantly from Novak's original school of thought. While
Novak's maps are generated for an individual, Trochim's are generated by a group.
3.3 HISTORY OF COMPETENCIES:
In mid fifties BENJAMIN laid the foundation for identifying educational objectives
by defining KSA, s needed to be developed in education. The educational objectives
developed by them were grouped under the cognitive domain.
David McClelland (Harvard Psychologist)
He pioneered the Competency Movement across the world and made it a global
concept. His classic books on Talent and Society, Achievement motive, The
Achieving Society, Motivating economic achievement and power the inner experience
brought out several new dimensions of the competency. These competencies exposed
by Mc .Cleland dealt with effective domain in Bloom’s terminology.
Richard Boyatzis.
The most effective people sense others reaction and find tune their own
responses to move interaction in the best direction. This emotional competence
emerged over and over again as a hallmark of star performance, particularly among
supervisors, managers and executives (Spencer and Spencer, 1993).
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter deals with the methodology in which the study is conducted to find out
the effectiveness of the competency mapping and competency assessment.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Structured questionnaire was used to collect the required details for the
research .A pilot test was conducted on HR executives alone to test the validity of the
questionnaire and to check the feasibility of statistical tools. The questionnaire
consists of two parts . The first part deals with assessment of self and the second part
deals with the assessment of importance of each competency to perform their job
effectively.
Secondary Data
The secondary data was collected using organization manuals, portal and
websites.
DATA ANALYSIS
Percentage analysis
Arithmetic Mean
Weighted Arithmetic Mean
Correlation
Chi-square test
The competencies of the managers of all the departments in corporate for which
the mapping was done were assimilated through the discussion with the project
guide in the organization (HR dept) and documents related to their existing
competency matrix.
the organization was used. It explains the hierarchy of the management from the
Step 4. Identified roles for which competency mapping was carried out
Detailed analysis on the core competency was done through references with
competency books written by Robbin Kessler and R.Palan . Also conversation was
1. ACHIVEMENT DRIVE
2. INITIATIVE AND CREATIVITY
3. DEVELOPING OTHERS
4. TECHNICAL SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE
5. ANALYTICAL AND PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS
6. TRUSTWORTHINESS
7. SERVICE ORIENTATION
8. LEADERSHIP
Presentation of tables
The tables have been formulated to observe the competency level of managers
and their importance in performing their job.
TABLE-1
INFERENCE
From the table it is observed that 39% respondents belong to age group of 30-35,
35% respondents belong to the age group of 35-40 and 16% of the respondents
belong to age group of above 40 and 10% of respondents belong to age group of 25-
30.
TABLE-2
1-5 6 19
5-10 13 42
10-15 7 23
15-20 3 10
ABOVE 20 2 6
Total 31 100.0
INFERENCE
From the above table it is clear that among the 31 respondents 13( 42%)of them have
got work experience for 5 -10 years ,7 (23% ) respondents have 10-15 years of
experience , 6 (19% ) respondents have 1-5 years of experience,3( 10%) respondents
have 15-20 years of experience and only 2 (6% ) respondents have experience of above
20 years .
TABLE-3
INFERENCE
From the above table it is found that 23% (7) of respondents are from finance and
accounts departments, 16% (5) of respondents are from IT department,13% (4) of
respondents are equally from human resource ,SCM and projects departments. 7%
(2) of respondents are from marketing department and 3% (1) of respondents equally
from legal, taxation, MIS, Health and QC and technical department.
TABLE- 4 ACHIEVEMENT
DRIVE
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.238
IT 4.133
SCM 4.583
PROJECTS 4.583
MARKETING 4.316
MIS 4
LEGAL 4.333
TECHNICAL 4.333
HEALTH AND QC 4
TAXATION 3.333
HR 4.5
INFERENCE
ACHIEVEMENT DRIVE
SELF
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
MIS
IT
LEGAL
FINANCE
SCM
MEAN
HR
PROJECTS
TAXATIO
0
N
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 5
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.428
IT 4.7
SCM 4.25
PROJECTS 4.375
MARKETING 4.412
MIS 4
LEGAL 4.5
TECHNICAL 4.5
HEALTH AND QC 3.5
TAXATION 4
HR 4.125
INFERENCE
Health and QC department manager’s CCL of Initiative is the lowest when compared
with the other departments and RCL.
CHART-2
SELF
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
MARKETING
HEALTH AND QC
TAXATION
TECHNICAL
MIS
IT
LEGAL
FINANCE
HR
SCM
PROJECTS
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 6
DEVELOPING OTHERS
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.5
IT 4.1
SCM 4
PROJECTS 4.625
MARKETING 4.425
MIS 4
LEGAL 4.5
TECHNICAL 5
HEALTH AND
QC 4.5
TAXATION 4
HR 4.75
INFERENCE
SCM, MIS and Taxation department manager’s CCL of developing others is the
lowest when compared with the other departments and RCL.
CHART-3
DEVELOPING OTHERS
SELF
4
MEAN
1
MARKETING
LEGAL
IT
MIS
TECHNICAL
SCM
HEALTH
AND QC
HR
FINANCE
TAXATIO
PROJECTS
0
N
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 7
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.285
IT 4.3
SCM 3.875
PROJECTS 4.5
MARKETING 4.337
MIS 4
LEGAL 3.5
TECHNICAL 4.5
HEALTH AND
QC 4.5
TAXATION 3.5
HR 4.375
INFERENCE
Legal and taxation department manager’s CCL of technical skill and knowledge is the
lowest when compared with the other departments and RCL.
CHART-4
SELF
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
MEAN
0.5
0
MARKETING
LEGAL
IT
MIS
TECHNICAL
SCM
HEALTH
AND QC
HR
FINANCE
TAXATIO
PROJECTS
DEPARTMENTS
N
TABLE- 8
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.214
IT 4.5
SCM 4.125
PROJECTS 4.375
MARKETING 4.625
MIS 4.5
LEGAL 4
TECHNICAL 4
HEALTH AND
QC 3.5
TAXATION 4
HR 4.75
INFERENCE
CHART- 5
SELF
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
MARKETING
TAXATION
TECHNICAL
MIS
IT
LEGAL
HR
FINANCE
SCM
PROJECTS
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 9
TRUSTWORTHINESS
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.285
IT 4.2
SCM 4.5
PROJECTS 4.75
MARKETING 4.412
MIS 4.5
LEGAL 3.5
TECHNICAL 5
HEALTH AND
QC 3
TAXATION 4
HR 4.625
INFERENCE
CHART-6
TRUSTWORTHINESS
SELF
4
MEAN
2
MARKETING
LEGAL
MIS
IT
TECHNICAL
SCM
HEALTH
AND QC
HR
FINANCE
TAXATIO
PROJECTS
1
N
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 10
SERVICE ORIENTATION AND RESPONSIBILITY
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.785
IT 4.3
SCM 4.625
PROJECTS 5
MARKETING 4.4
MIS 4.5
LEGAL 3.5
TECHNICAL 4.5
HEALTH AND
QC 4.5
TAXATION 4.5
HR 4.5
INFERENCE
SERVICE ORIENTATION
SELF
3
MEAN
1
MARKETING
LEGAL
MIS
IT
TECHNICAL
SCM
HEALTH
AND QC
HR
FINANCE
TAXATIO
PROJECTS
0
N
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 11
LEADERSHIP
DEPARTMENTS MEAN
FINANCE 4.214
IT 4.3
SCM 4.25
PROJECTS 4.125
MARKETING 4.212
MIS 4.5
LEGAL 3.5
TECHNICAL 4
HEALTH AND
QC 4
TAXATION 4
HR 4.125
INFERENCE
Legal department manager’s CCL of Leadership is the lowest when compared with
the other departments and RCL.
CHART-8
LEADERSHIP
SELF
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
MEAN
0.5
0
MARKETING
LEGAL
MIS
IT
TECHNICAL
SCM
HEALTH
AND QC
HR
FINANCE
TAXATIO
PROJECTS
DEPARTMENTS
N
TABLE- 12
CHART-9
MEAN OF SELF
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
4
MEAN
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.6
MARKETING
LEGAL
MIS
IT
HEALTH
TECHNICAL
SCM
AND QC
HR
FINANCE
TAXATIO
PROJECTS
COMPETENCIES
TABLE- 13
INFERENCE
Service orientation among managers is very high when compared with
other competency. Leadership competency is found comparatively low among all
department managers.
CHART-10
OVERALL COMPETENCY LEVEL AT CORPORATE
SELF
4.6
4.5
4.4
WAM
4.3
4.2
4.1
4
ACHIVEMENT DRIVE
ORIENTATION
TECHNICAL SKILLS
TRUSTWORTHINESS
LEADERSHIP
AND KNOWLEDGE
DEVELOPING
ANALYTICAL AND
PROBLEM SOLVING
CREATIVITY
SERVICE
OTHERS
INITIATIVE
3.9
SKILLS
AND
COM PETENCIES
TABLE-14
INFERENCE
It is found that Human resource department managers highly use these competencies
to perform their jobs.
It is found that Taxation department managers use very less competencies to perform
their job when compared with other departments
CHART-11
MEAN OF
5 JOB
3
MEAN
0
TAXATION
IT
MARKETING
HEALTH
LEGAL
MIS
HR
AND QC
ACCOUNTS
TECHNICAL
SCM
PROJECTS
FINANCE
AND
DEPARTMENTS
TABLE- 15
INFERENCE
CHART-12
3.8
ACHIVEMENT DRIVE
TRUSTWORTHINESS
AND KNOWLEDGE
ORIENTATION
LEADERSHIP
TECHNICAL SKILLS
DEVELOPING
ANALYTICAL AND
PROBLEM SOLVING
CREATIVITY
SERVICE
OTHERS
INITIATIVE
SKILLS
AND
COMPETENCIES
CORRELATION ANALYSIS
The correlation analysis deals with the association of two or more variables.
The measure of correlation is called correlation coefficient.
Assumption:
TABLE- 17
Correlation= 0.5565
INFERENCE
The coefficient of correlation exists between 0.4-0.6 which denotes that there exist a
moderate relationship between the two variables i.e. between individual’s
competency level of each department and overall usage of competencies in each
department.
CORRELATION ANALYSIS 2:
TABLE-18
VARIABLE-1
WM OF
COMPETENCIES SELF
ACHIVEMENT DRIVE 4.322
INITIATIVE AND CREATIVITY 4.338
DEVELOPING OTHERS 4.403
TECHNICAL SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE 4.241
ANALYTICAL AND PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS 4.322
TRUSTWORTHINESS 4.370
SERVICE ORIENTATION 4.564
LEADERSHIP 4.161
TABLE-19
VARIABLE-2
COMPETENCIES WM OF JOB
ACHIVEMENT DRIVE 4.268
INITIATIVE AND CREATIVITY 4.161
DEVELOPING OTHERS 4.129
TECHNICAL SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE 4.064
ANALYTICAL AND PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS 4.241
TRUSTWORTHINESS 4.225
SERVICE ORIENTATION 4.467
LEADERSHIP 4.064
Correlation= 0.843608865
INFERENCE
The coefficient of correlation is greater than 0.6 (>6) which denotes that there exist a strong
relationship between the two variables level of each competency of self and usage of each
competency in job.
CHI-SQUARE TEST
Hypothesis
Ho. There is no association between age and their level of achievement drive. Ha:
There is an association between age and their level of achievement drive TABLE-20
1.ACHIEVEMENT DRIVE
AGE 20-25 0 2 1 3
25-30 0 3 2 5
30-35 1 6 4 11
35-40 0 2 5 7
ABOVE 40 0 3 2 5
Total 1 16 14 31
TABLE-20(A)
Chi-Square Tests
N of Valid Cases 31
TABLE-20 (B)
INTERPRETATION
As the table value is greater than the calculated chi-square value, the null hypothesis
is accepted. (i.e.) There is no association between age and their level of achievement drive
CHAPTER-6
TABLE-21
Projects, Technical ,
Technical knowledge Legal and taxation
Health and Q departments
Moderate relation exists between the two variables i.e. between individual’s
competency level of each department and overall usage of competencies in
each department.
Strong relation between the two variables level of each competency of self
and usage of each competency in job.
There is no association between age and their level of achievement drive
CHAPTER-7
SUGGESTIONS
CONCLUSION
Books
Gary Dessler, ‘Human Resource Management’: New Delhi, Pearson Education Inc., 2003.
R.PALAN ‘s “ COMPETENCY MANAGEMENT”
Websites
www.ehresoureces.com
www.google.com
www.irisolutions.com
http://humanresource.about.com
www.tvrls.com
www.mindtools.com
www.citeman.com
A Study on Competency Mapping and Competency Assessment at
Department: Designation:
Gender: Experience:
Age: ( ) 20-25; ( ) 25-30; ( ) 30-35; ( ) 35-40; ( ) above 40;
Heritage