Hdfe Sem 5
Hdfe Sem 5
Structure
9.0 Objectives
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Origin of the Concept of Children's Rights
9.2.1 Drafting of the CRC
9.3.2 Provisions
9.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit will help you to:
9.1 INTRODUCTION
The development of international concern for the rights of the child was propelled
by a growing concern for human security and human development in a global izing
world. In this context, children, in view of their vulnerability are the most affected
lot. Their vulnerability is further precipitated by poverty, conflict, exploitation
and related problems. In the decade of 1990s, issues like conflict, civil war, child
soldiers, divided families and broken childhood became strikingly evident
throughout the world. The international community has come to realize that
children as a group must have a set of exclusive rights and safeguards designed
for them in addition to enjoying the rights enshrined in other human rights treaties.
This realization led to the adoption of the comprehensive treaty enshrining all
the rights required for children. Prior to the Convention on the Rights of the
Child (hereafter the CRC), Article 24 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) and Article 10 of the International Covenant on the
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) recognized the child's need for
entitlement to special measures of protection. These two articles provided the
legal protection and helped in greater elaboration of special measures and rights
to form the CRe. In other words, CRC has bloomed from the 1959 UN declaration
I Human Rights of Groups on the Rights of the Child and the minimal provisions of the two Covenants. By
far, the CRC represents the best elaboration on the rights of the child.
The Convention also reflected a change of perspective in that children were now
being seen as the independent bearers of rights. The notion that prevailed earlier
was that only those persons who could claim rights and impose corresponding
obligations on others could be bearers of rights. This notion was replaced by the
idea that rights are also understood as legally protected interests. That is to say,
children's rights constitute legal safeguards to protect them from exploitation
and vulnerability. Moreover, to exclude anyone from holding rights merely
because s/he will not be able to claim. protect or exercise her/his rights responsibly
is to speak the language of subordination and paternalism and it reflects a deep
sense of mistrust of another's credibility to be the deserving carrier of rights.
The Convention, therefore, was a definite departure from the prevailing
conventional thought. It empowered children with rights and crystallized a rights-
based approach to the issues concerning children.
In 1924 the Assembly of the League of Nations adopted the Declaration on the
Rights of the Child. This Declaration makes the first mention of the "rights of
the child" in any international document. It endorsed a similar Declaration
promulgated by the Council of the Save the Children International Union in
1923. The League's Declaration contains a sentence that has become the motto
of all supporters of the children's cause: "mankind owes to the child the best it
has to give". As a natural corollary, the UN General Assembly adopted the
Declaration of the Rights of the Child on 20 November 1959. It was this text that
was the springboard for the initiative to draft a convention on the subject. .
The essential theme underlying these two non-binding declarations was that
children need special protection and priority care because, socially and physically
speaking, they represent the weakest part of human society. This situation of
objective inferiority often favours their exploitation in different areas: labour,
sexual integrity, etc. Therefore, they need special protection. At the same time
they depend for their survival on adults. Since children are perceived as the
future of mankind, the societies invest in their own future by taking care of
them.
The contribution of the NGOs in the drafting process has been highly laudable.
In 1983 an NGO Ad Hoc Group was created in order to develop joint proposals
and ensure greater coherence among the NGOs and submit annual reports to the
Working Groups. The success of the NGO's activities to promote support for
CRC was undoubtedly instrumental in getting many governments to take the
drafting process more seriously, and in giving the Working Group a renewed
sense of purpose. The Working Group acted on the basis of consensus; no proposal
was taken to a vote. This led to a very lengthy process, and the consensus system
resulted in the abandonment of certain proposals, notwithstanding the support
of a clear majority.
During drafting of the CRC many issues of controversy arose. Three of them are
important. The first controversy was concerning the issue of definition of the
minimum age of child. There were two opposing groups having differing
viewpoints as to the moment when childhood begins - at conception or at birth.
Neither side could agree to what would have been a definition of the child in
Article 1 primarily owing to concerns regarding the issue of abortion. The
Working Group finally came to a consensus that explicit reference to the
formulation of minimum age in the Declaration would be made in the Preamble
~o the Convention, and that there would be no mention of miriimum age in
Article 1.
The second major area of disagreement was concerning the freedom of religion
(Article 14). Its initial formulation, modelled on the text of Article 18 of the
ICCPR, included reference to the "freedom to have or to adopt a religion of
his choice". It was subsequently pointed .IUtin the strongest terms that, under
Islam, a child does not have the right to choose another religion, and that the
right contained in the Covenant could only be held to apply to adults. This put
the drafters in a delicate situation. Reluctantly, in the end therewas a consensus
to drop all reference to choice.
The third issue that provoked considerable problems was regarding the age at
which children should be permitted to take part in armed conflicts (Article 38).
This issue generated heated debate in the drafting process. The NGOs and many
• governments fought tirelessly to ensure that even if children could be recruited
-
c
c
c
into the armed forces as of age fifteen, at least they be prohibited from taking a
direct part in hostilities until they had reached eighteen years. At the last meeting
-
~
N
N
It)
of the Working Group, the United States delegate categorically refused to give
such protection to the fifteen to seventeen age group.
25
Human Rights of Groups Check Your Progress 1
1) Why do you think the rights of children are more important than compared
to 'the rights of other groups? ' '
, , ,
, .
• ' ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• :•••• , ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ,••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• I •••••••••• i •••••
' ••• ~ ••••••••••••• , ••••••• ~ I ••• I ••••• I , I •• , .' •••• t, t,'·' •• f •• I •• , • I I •••••••••••• " • ~ •••••• I • I • I ••••••• t' •••• , •••• ~ , ••• , • , ••• ,
.............................................................................................................
, ,
, .
........................................................................................................................
, ' ,
.......................................................................................... - .
· " ;, ' ~ .
3) What were the three controversial issues that dominated the debates during
the drafting of the CRC? .
· ,
~ ,
', , ' .
............................ , .
................................... ' : .
With the adoption of two Optional Protocols the scope of CRC is widened. 0.,
16 May 2000, the UN General Assembly adopted two Optional Protocoh )
CRC: First Optional Protocol to CRC on the Involvement of Children in Armed
Conflict and the Second Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child
26
Prostitution and Child Pornography. These Protocols entered into force on 18 Rights of the Child
These general principles guide the interpretation ofthe Convention and all actions
concerning the children.
Best interest of the child is the most important principle that has attracted a
great deal of academic interest. Simply put, it means that all legislative,
administrative.judicial, public and private bodies concerned with children's rights
must constantly corisider and bear in mind as to how their decisions and actions
would affect the rights of the child. Best interest of the child is therefore the
primary consideration that must inform all actions concerning children. As article
3(1) ofthe Convention states, this principle is equally applicable for public bodies,
private actors and non-governmental organizations working in the field of human
rights. "
-
o
o
o
Participation: Article 12(1) of the Convention provides for the child's right to
participation in all matters that might affect children. However, views of the
-
'r"
child must be given due weightage in accordance with its age and maturity. States
Parties are obligated to ensure that avenues for such participation by children are
27
Human Rights of Groups established. The right to express one's views freely and the right to participation
are essential if the States Parties are to ensure that decisions on issues concerning
children are made with due consideration to the best interest of the child. Such
participation, it has been further emphasized by the Committee on the Rights of
the Child, should not be limited to "listening" to the child; the need is to take
their views seriously. In brief, every State is obligated to develop avenues for a
two-way communication between children and policy makers.
9.3.2 Provisions
The Convention's coverage is considerable: Article I states that the CRC applies
to "every human being below the age of 18 years unless, under the law appl icable
to the child, majority is attained earlier" (Article 1), thus putting the burden on
the state to justify instances in which lower age limit is prescribed. After the
initial definition and the principles of non-discrimination and the best interest of
the child, substantive provisions regarding rights begin. The rights contained in
the CRC have often been analysed around three Ps - rights related to
"protection", "provision" and "participation". The CRC covers all the traditional
areas of human rights - civil, political, economic, social and cultural. It
underscores the indivisibility, mutual reinforcement and equal importance of all
rights. The only exception to this is the explicit mention of economic, social and
cultural rights in Article 4, which requires states parties to undertake such
measures to the "maximum extent of their available resources and where needed,
within the framework of international cooperation".
The Convention emphasizes the importance of the family and the need to create
an environment that is conducive to the healthy growth and development of
children. From the Preamble and throughout the text, great importance is attached
to the role of the family. The family is referred to as "the fundamental group of
society" (Preamble). The document recognizes that "for the full and harmonious
development of his or her personality", a child "should grow up in a family
environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding." Family is
broadly defined, including "members of the extended family or community as
provided for by local custom" (Article 5). With a view to promote the basic
principles of "best interests of the child" and "respect for the views of the child",
the following rights and responsibilities are provided under family and alternative
care:
Most of the rights contained in the above section are protection rights. It may be
. noted that the CRC has to be implemented in the context of existing international
norms and national laws if those are more conducive to the realization of the
rights of the child. Hence, although Article 1 defines child as a person below the
age of 18 years, there are differing national laws prescribing minimum age for
marriage, employment etc.
d) Right to social security and child care services and facilities (Article 26 and
Art. 18, para 3);
a) Right to name and nationality,' including, registration after birth; the right to
know and be cared by parents (Article 7).
b) Preservation ofIdentity (Article 8) - The child's right to know one's parents
is important. The problem mainly arises when the child is abandoned by the
parents, or when the child is born out of wedlock, or when the parents divorce.
This provision is closely interrelated with Article 8 which obligates states
to protect basic aspects of the child's identity, i.e., nationality, name and
family relations.
c) Freedom of expression (Article 13);
d) Access to appropriate information (Article 17);
e) Freedom of thought, conscience and religion {Article 14);
f) Freedom of Association and of peaceful assembly (Article 15);
g) Protection of privacy (Article 16);
h) The right not to be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment (Article 37 (a)).
There are no duties explicitly imposed on children for the rights that they enjoy
under the Convention. This is so because it is normally held that since children
are seen as vulnerable individuals in need of protection, the duty to realize and
maintain children's rights falls on the state and society. The"member states are
obligated to make appropriate laws, implement them, establish national
institutions for child's welfare and rights, allocate funds and draft policies to
realize the rights contained in the Convention. Additionally, family, community,
non-governmental organizations and local networking groups concerned with
children play a significant role in realizing the rights of the child.
30
2) Which articles of CRe' aim at promoting the basic principles of the "best Rights of the Child
interest of the child". and "respect for the views of the child"?
· ~.................
.
............................................................ .
• •••••••• ~ " 0.- ••••••••• ~ ••••••••• ~.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ~ •• 0"' •
. '. . . . . '."
· ~..................................•...................
. . .
4) Which social, educational and cultural rights of the child are recognized in.
CRC? .-
........................................................................................................................
.
.
.
. . .
.
· . '"
~ .
• • I ••••••• ', ••• '••••••••••••• : •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• '•••••••••••••••••••••• ~••••••••••••••••••••
. ..
• •••••••••• ; .; ••• : ••••••••••••• 0 ••••• 0 •• 0 ••• 0 •••• 0 • o. ~•.• 0 0 • 0 ·00 •••••••••••••• ~ •••••• 0 •••••••••••••••••• ; ••••••••••••••••••••
The purpose of this procedure is to aid the Committee in understanding the level
of adherence to the Convention achieved by a state party so that possible ways
can be suggested for overcoming the difficulties in implementation. The
Committee has repeatedly emphasized that reporting procedure itself should not
be seen as a mere administrative exercise; rather, it is intended to give a state
party an opportunity to review the existing legislation, harmonize it with the
Convention provisions, evaluate their implementation, interact with NGOs, and
to appreciate the attendant problems. The objective of the entire process is to
make the domestic environment more child-friendly, and thereby enhance the
understanding of, and the capacity to implement, the Convention. The states
parties are obliged to provide sufficient information on the measures adopted
and the progress made in the actual enjoyment of those rights to let the Committee
have a comprehensive understanding. Further, the reports are to be made widely
available within the country to generate public debate and domestic scrutiny
(article 44(6)).
of state reports reveals that the Committee has faced progressive deterioration in
state reporting. It is helpless in tracking down erring states because there is no
provision for punitive action against such delays except for sending repeated
reminders or allowing the state parties to submit combined reports in case they
are overdue. Delay is not only on the part of the states; the Committee too has
experienced a yawning gap between the date of submission of a report and the
date of its consideration. Part of the reason for this delay was that the session
allocated to the Committee was brief and was extended only in 1995.
Thirdly, success always comes at a price. As the most widely ratified Convention,
the number of states parties and the volume of communications are large. There
is enormous amount of work to be done before a report is taken up for discussion.
The secretarial assistance available to the Committee is inadequate which makes
timely processing of reports difficult.
OP-AC was adopted to address the pressing problem of rampant use of child
soldiers in the 1990s. The decade of 1990s witnessed a large number of civil
wars across the world. In most of these wars, the insurgent groups and irregular
armies accounted for widespread recruitment of children below the age of 18
years for active participation in hostilities and their deployment in conflict zones.
In some cases, the children operating machine guns and automatic weapons were
as young as 12 years of age. Secondly, many countries have deposited reservation
or declaration to Article 38 of the Convention that requires the member states to
refrain from recruiting persons below the age of 15 years to the armed forces and
to ensure that such persons do not take direct part in hostilities. To plug these
loopholes a comprehensive and exclusive Optional Protocol was required.
OP-AC sets the age limit for the compulsory recruitment and direct participation
in hostilities at 18 years and requires states parties to raise the minimum age for
voluntary recruitment to at least 16. It prohibits insurgent armed groups "under
. any circumstances" from recruiting persons under 18 years or using them in
hostilities. Insofar as the insurgent groups are concerned, the states shall adopt
legal measures to prohibit and criminalize the practice of recruiting children. In
its Preamble, the Protocol notes the adoption of the Rome Statute of the
International Criminal Court (ICC) and, in particular, its inclusion as a war crime
of conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 or using them to
participate actively in hostilities in both international and non-international armed
conflicts.
33
Human Rights of Groups Article 3 of the OP-AC further notes that in the instance of recruitment of members
to the armed forces under the age of 18 years, the states shall maintain certain
safeguards in respect of such recruitment. These safeguards include that:
The OP-AC also requires the states parties to make a binding declaration that
such recruitments are not forced or coerced. Moreover, Article 6 of the Protocol
requires states parties to take necessary legal, administrative and other measures
to ensure effective implementation of Protocol's provisions.
The OP-SC requires states parties to prohibit the sale of children, child prostitution
and child pornography. Article 2 ofthe Protocol defines these three acts as follows:
The states parties are also required to ensure that these activities are fully covered
under its criminal or penal law and in extradition law between state parties. This
means that an offender cannot seek refuge in another country after committing
the offence. As positive measures, the states are required to adopt appropriate
measures to protect the rights and interests of child victims of these offences.
Such measures should include informing the child victims of their rights;
providing appropriate support services, protecting their privacy and identity and
providing for their safety at all stages of the criminal justice process.
The two Optional Protocols have implementation mechanism similar to the one
provided under the Convention. States parties are required to submit, within two
years of ratification, a comprehensive report to the Committee of the CRC on
measures it has adopted to implement the provisions of the Protocols. Following
the comprehensive report, the states parties have to submit periodic reports on
the Optional Protocols every five years.
Both these Protocols have entered into force in 2002. This is remarkable in more
ways than one; the CRC and the Protocols have come into force reasonably early
compared to other human rights treaties and their protocols. Together, the CRe
and the two Optional Protocols provide a comprehensive international framework
for the protection of children. The real challenge today is to ensure their effective
implementation world over.
34
Check Your Progress 3 Rights of the Child
.................................................................................................... " .
.......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
..............................................~ " .
......................................................................................................................
2) Who all participate in the deliberations of the Committee in reviewing state
reports?
.......................................................................................................................
......................... : -: .
,..
J
)
a unique change in the global perception of the child. As for the present century,
the Convention ~ill surely face complex challenges, such as its implementation
... in a world ridden by increasing poverty and violence .
~
,I
Despite the inadequacies, the monitoring mechanism of the Convention has been
reasonably successful so far. Its significant achievements have been in enhancing 35
Human Rights of Groups the level of participation and dialogue between the Committee, the reporting
states, the NGOs and other UN organs and bodies through dispassionate,
constructive engagement of all.
1) The rights of children are more important than those of other groups because
of many factors. They depend on adults for the realization of their rights.
They are more vulnerable compared to other persons in the society. This
vulnerability flows as much out of age as from poverty, conflict and
exploitation. For details, refer to section 9.1.
2) The origin of the CRC must be traced from the 1924 League Declaration on
the Rights of the Child. This Declaration formed the basis of a similar
Declaration adopted by the United Nations in 1959. In addition to these
Declarations, one article each relevant to children is found in the ICCPR
and ICESCR, which formed the legal protective shield before the adoption
of the CRC. For details see section 9.2.
3) The three controversial issues that dominated the deliberations during the
drafting ofthe Convention were: defmition of the minimum age of the child;
freedom of religion; and, the minimum age at which children should be
permitted to take part in armed conflicts. For details see sub-section 9.2.1.
2) Articles 5, 18,9, 10,27,20,21, 11, 19,39 and 25. See sub-section 9.3.2
. ;
-.
o
o
o
-
"I""
N
N
It)
37