References

Download as txt, pdf, or txt
Download as txt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Bibliography

Article
Andre Schevciw, The Unwilling Licensee in the Context of Standards Essential Patent
Licensing Negotiations, AIPLA Q J. 2019, 369-400
Anusha Pirani, The Unitary Patent Court - Caution Ahead, Ct Uncourt. 2018, 5-8
Claire Guo, Intersection of Antitrust Laws with Evolving Frand Terms in Standard
Essential Patent Disputes, J Marshall Rev IP L. 2019, [i]-284
Christopher S. Storm, Standard Essential Patents versus the World: How the Internet
of Things Will Change Patent Licensing Forever, Tex Intell Prop LJ. 2022, 259-314
Cody M. Akins, Overdeclaration of Standard-Essential Patents, Tex L Rev. 2020, 579-
599
Damien Geradin, The Meaning of Fair and Reasonable in the Context of Third-Party
Determination of Frand Terms, Geo Mason L Rev. 2014, 919-956
Daniel F. Spulber, Antitrust Policy toward Patent Licensing: Why Negotiation
Matters, Minn JL Sci & Tech. 2020, 83-162
Daniel F. Spulber, Finding Reasonable Royalty Damages: A Contract Approach to
Patent Infringement, U Ill L Rev. 2019, 615-700
Daniel F. Spulber, Patent Licensing and Bargaining with Innovative Complements and
Substitutes, Res. Econ. 2016, 693-713
Daniel F. Spulber, Licensing Standard Essential Patents with FRAND Commitments:
Preparing for 5G Mobile Telecommunications, Colo Tech LJ. 2020, 79-160
Daniel G. Swanson, William J. Baumol, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND)
Royalties, Standards Selection, and Control of Market Power, Antitrust LJ. 2005, 1-
58
David J. Teece, Patent Counting and the “Top-down” Approach to Patent Valuations:
An Economic and Public Policy Appraisal of Reasonable Royalties, Criterion J on
Innovation. 2020, 157-191
Erik Hovenkamp & Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Patent Pools and Related Technology Sharing,
Penn Carey Law. 2017, 1-18
Fei Deng, Gregory K. Leonard & Mario A. Lopez, Comparative Analysis of Court-
Determined FRAND Royalty Rates, ANTITRUST. 2018, 47-53
Felix K. Hess, US anti-suit injunctions and German anti-anti-suit injunctions in
SEP disputes, J World Intell Prop. 2022, 536-555
Florian Schmidt-Bogatzky & Clemens Heusch, Requirements in SEP License Negotiations
- Sustaining a FRAND Offer - The Relation between Confidentiality Issues and
Providing Evidence for Its Own
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351940
II
Fair and Reasonable Position, Int’l In-House Counsel J. 2018, 1-6
Haris Tsilikas, Huawei v. ZTE in Context—EU Competition Policy and Collaborative
Standardization in Wireless Telecommunications, IIC-Int’L Rev. Intell. Prop. & Comp
L. 2017, 151-178
Haris Tsilikas, Comparable Agreements and the “Top-Down” Approach to FRAND
Royalties Determination, CPI IP Column. 2020, 1-10
Jason R. Bartlett & Jorge L. Contreras, Rationalizing FRAND Royalties: Can
Interpleader Save the Internet of Things, Rev Litig. 2017, 285-334
John C. Jarosz & Michael J. Chapman, The Hypothetical Negotiation and Reasonable
Royalty Damages: The Tail Wagging the Dog, Stan Tech L Rev. 2013, 769-832
Jorge L. Contreras, Aggregated Royalties for Top-down FRAND Determinations:
Revisiting Joint Negotiation, Antitrust Bulletin. 2017, 690-709
Jorge L. Contreras, Anti-Suit Injunctions and Jurisdictional Competition in Global
FRAND Litigation: The Case for Judicial Restraint, NYU JIPEL. 2020, 171-184
Jorge L. Contreras, Fixing Frand: A Pseudo-Pool Approach to Standards-Based Patent
Licensing, Antitrust LJ. 2013, 47-97
Jorge L. Contreras, Global Rate Setting: A Solution for Standards-Essential
Patents, Wash L Rev. 2019, 701-758
Jorge L. Contreras, It’s Anti-Suit Injunctions All the Way Down—The Strange New
Realities of International Litigation Over Standards-Essential Patents, IP
Litigator. 2020, 1-7
Jorge L. Contreras, The New Extraterritoriality: FRAND Royalties, Anti-Suit
Injunctions and the Global Race to the Bottom in Disputes over Standards-Essential
Patents, BU J Sci & Tech L. 2019, 251-290
J. Gregory Sidak, Misconceptions concerning the Use of Hedonic Prices to Determine
FRAND or RAND Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents, Criterion J on Innovation.
2019, 501-532
J. Gregory Sidak, Negotiating FRAND Licenses in Good Faith, Criterion J on
Innovation. 2020, 1-28
J. Gregory Sidak, Is Patent Holdup a Hoax, Criterion J on Innovation. 2018, 401-554
Jyh-An Lee, Implementing the FRAND Standard in China, Vand J Ent & Tech L. 2016,
37-86
Kassandra Maldonado, Breaching RAND and Reaching for Reasonable: Microsoft v.
Motorola and Standard-Essential Patent Litigation, Berkeley Tech LJ. 2014, 419-464
Kelce Wilson, Designing a Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Program, les Nouvelles.
2018, 202-209
King Fung Tsang & Jyh-An Lee, The Ping-Pong Olympics of Antisuit Injunction in
FRAND Litigation, Mich Tech L Rev. 2022, 305-384
Mario Mariniello, Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) Terms: A
Challenge for Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351940
III
Competition Authorities, J. Comp. L. & Econ. 2011, 523-541
Mark A. Lemley, Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations,
Calif L. Rev. 2002, 1889-1980
Mark A. Lemley & Carl Shapiro, Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, Tex. L. Rev.
2007, 1991-2050
Matthieu Dhenne, Calculation of FRAND Royalties: An Overview of Practices Around
the World, European Intell Prop Rev. 2019, 754-764
Michael Renaud, James Wordarwski, & Sandra Badin, Efficient Infringement and the
Undervaluation of Standard-Essential Patents, INTELL. ASSET MGMT. 2016, 59-62
Michelle Emeterio, Antitrust Deterrence of Patent Holdup: Refocusing on Competition
as a Driver of Technological Innovation, UC Irvine L Rev. 2022, 1091-1134
Peter E. Herzog, Brussels and Lugano, Should You Race to the Courthouse or Race for
a Judgment, Am J Comp L. 1995, 379-400
Peter K. Yu, Jorge L. Contreras & Yu Yang, Transplanting Anti-Suit Injunctions, Am
U L Rev. 2022, 1537-1618
Raghavendra R. Murthy, Why Can’t We Be FRANDs?: Anti-Suit Injunctions,
International Comity, and International Commercial Arbitration in Standard-
Essential Patent Litigation, Vand L Rev. 2022, 1609-[ii]
Richard A. Epstein & Kayvan B. Noroozi, Why Incentives for Patent Holdout Threaten
to Dismantle FRAND, and Why It Matters, Berkeley Tech LJ. 2017, 1381-1432
Roya Ghafele, Global Licensing on FRAND Terms in Light of Unwired Planet v. Huawei,
UCLA JL & Tech. 2020, i-21
Samuel Howard, FRAND, RAND, & the Problem at Hand: Increasing Certainty in
Infringement Damages for Standard-Essential Patents, BU J Sci & Tech L. 2021, 204-
236
Stanley M. Besen, Why Royalties for Standard Essential Patents Should Not Be Set by
the Courts, Chicago-Kent J. Intell Prop. 2016, 19-48
Theodore Eisenberg & Geoffrey P. Miller, The Flight to New York: An Empirical Study
of Choice of Law and Choice of Forum Clauses in Publicly-Held Companies’ Contracts,
Cardozo L Rev. 2009, 1475-1512
Thomas F. Cotter, Patent Damages Heuristics, Tex Intell Prop LJ. 2018, 159-214
Thomas F. Cotter, Erik Hovenkamp & Norman Siebrasse, Demystifying Patent Holdup,
Wash & Lee L Rev. 2019, 1501-1566
Tim Pohlmann, Who Is Leading the 5G Patent Race for Edge Computing, Managing Intell
Prop. 2021, 38-42
Yang Yu & Jorge L. Contreras, Will China’s New Anti-Suit Injunctions Shift the
Balance of Global
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4351940
IV
FRAND Litigation, Patently-O. 2020, No. 403, 1-5
Zelin Yang, Damaging Royalties: An Overview of Reasonable Royalty Damages, Berkeley
Tech LJ. 2014, 647-680

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy