Cambridge O Level: Religious Studies (Bible Knowledge) 2048/12
Cambridge O Level: Religious Studies (Bible Knowledge) 2048/12
Cambridge O Level: Religious Studies (Bible Knowledge) 2048/12
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre−U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
2 2−3 Demonstrates some understanding of the question. A fair, mainly relevant but
generally undeveloped response. The candidate demonstrates some factual
knowledge and understanding, which is fairly accurate but may lack specific
detail. Some of the main points are covered but lack substance. The information
will be presented for the most part in a structured format.
AO2 (Evaluation)
4 7−8 Recognises and explains the significance of the issue(s). A personal response is
fully supported. A range of points of view supported by justified arguments/
discussion. The information is presented in a clear and organised way. Evidence
of informed insights.
3 5−6 Understands the significance of the question. Seeks to move clearly beyond a
purely descriptive approach. Justified arguments/different points of view
supported by some discussion. Evidence of appropriate personal response.
Some evidence of informed insights.
2 3−4 Understands the question but the response is mainly descriptive. Only one view
offered with limited support or discussion. Limited or no evidence of informed
insights.
1(a) Give an account of Joseph and his family's escape to Egypt, including 6
their return to Nazareth.
Matthew 2:13−23
When they had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream.
‘Get up,’ he said, ‘take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay
there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.’
So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for
Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what
the Lord had said through the prophet: ‘Out of Egypt I called my son.’
When Herod realised that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was
furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity
who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had
learned from the Magi. Then what was said through the prophet Jeremiah
was fulfilled: ‘A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning,
Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they
are no more.’
So he got up, took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel.
Having been warned in a dream, he withdrew to the district of Galilee, and
he went and lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said
through the prophets, that he would be called a Nazarene.
1(b) Explain why it is thought that Matthew might have been writing his 6
gospel for Jewish Christians.
Matthew makes constant use of the Jewish scriptures and the title Son of
David and shows Jesus only working among his own people, the Jews. He
emphasises that Jesus was a descendant of David: he acknowledged and
interpreted the Laws and traditions of Moses, and his life and ministry was a
fulfilment of Old Testament prophecies.
2(a) Describe the teaching in the Sermon on the Mount about revenge and 6
love for enemies.
Matthew 5:38−42
Revenge: ‘You have heard that it was said, “Eye for eye, and tooth for
tooth.” But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the
right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue
you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to
go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do
not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.’
Matthew 5:43−48
Love for enemies: ‘You have heard that it was said, “Love your neighbour
and hate your enemy.” But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those
who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He
causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good and sends rain on the
righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward
will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet
only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even
pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.’
2(b) Explain ways in which Christians today might follow this teaching. 6
This might be done by following the example of Jesus and responses might
give instances of this and how they might be applied in life.
Another view: some candidates might explore the idea that there are
different types of enemies who might be responded to differently.
(i) Jesus answered: ‘Go back and report to John what you hear and
see: the blind receive sight, the lame walk and those who have
leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised and the good
news is preached to the poor. Blessed is the man who does not fall
away on account of me.
3(b) Explain what Jesus' answer to John the Baptist might teach about the 6
person and work of Jesus.
Responses might explain that Jesus’ answer shows that he was all things
expected of a Messiah, as prophesied by Isaiah in the Old Testament. The
blind receive sight, the lame walk and those who have leprosy are cured,
the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is preached to the
poor. The true identity of Jesus is seen through the deeds he performs.
There is also a warning against the danger of finding fault with someone
without knowing the full facts and this seems to be a rebuke to John or
others about doubting Jesus.
3(c) ‘The work of Jesus and John the Baptist was completely different.’ 8
To what extent do you agree? Show in your answer that you have
considered more than one point of view.
To agree: responses might offer arguments that Jesus was the Messiah
(John was the forerunner). Jesus had supernatural powers that John did not
possess − Jesus was mightier. There was a difference in the baptism
offered by Jesus and John. John’s baptism was one of repentance for sins
and preparation for the one to come. Jesus offered forgiveness and
redemption. Jesus’ death and resurrection was his preordained fate. John
was imprisoned and executed without trial.
Matthew 17:14−18
When they came to the crowd, a man approached Jesus and knelt before
him. “Lord, have mercy on my son,” he said. “He has seizures and is
suffering greatly. He often falls into the fire or into the water. I brought him to
your disciples, but they could not heal him.”
“You unbelieving and perverse generation,” Jesus replied, “how long shall I
stay with you? How long shall I put up with you? Bring the boy here to me.”
Jesus rebuked the demon, and it came out of the boy, and he was healed at
that moment.
Then the disciples came to Jesus in private and asked, “Why couldn’t we
drive it out?”
He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith
as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here
to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”
4(b) Explain the significance of Jesus being able to cast out demons. 6
Exorcisms were regarded as a physical act and that is why in the account
Jesus is said to speak to/rebuke the demon and it was said to come out of
the boy immediately.
In First Century Jewish thought the world was a battle ground between good
and evil and sickness was seen as a sign that evil was winning. In incidents
where Jesus heals and exorcises the evil spirits they are seen to cringe and
be afraid of him as he banishes them.
The purpose of the exorcism miracles is to show Jesus' power over the spirit
world. Such miracles were regarded as signs that the power of God was at
work in the world. They were a sign that Jesus was the Messiah (the Son of
God).
Another view: some candidates may explore the nature of miracles and
whether all miracles happen because of faith or whether God sometimes
could be said to respond in different ways.
Matthew 22:1−14
‘Then he sent some more servants and said, “Tell those who have been
invited that I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and fattened cattle have
been slaughtered, and everything is ready. Come to the wedding banquet.”
‘But they paid no attention and went off – one to his field, another to his
business. The rest seized his servants, ill−treated them and killed them. The
king was enraged. He sent his army and destroyed those murderers and
burned their city.
‘Then he said to his servants, “The wedding banquet is ready, but those I
invited did not deserve to come. So go to the street corners and invite to the
banquet anyone you find.” So, the servants went out into the streets and
gathered all the people they could find, the bad as well as the good, and the
wedding hall was filled with guests.’
When the king came in to see the guests, he saw a man without wedding
clothing and asked him about this. The man had no answer and the king
had him thrown into the darkness where there is weeping and grinding of
teeth. ‘Many are called, but few chosen.’
The king then instructed that those who were considered the outcasts, the
poor − both the good and the bad in society − should be brought into the
feast to replace the religious leaders and hypocrites who were undeserving.
As at the King’s banquet, many are called by God (to the kingdom of
heaven) but only the deserving are chosen − and they might be found
anywhere.
The first Christians would have seen this as a warning to be ready for the
second coming of Christ and also an understanding that the church should
be open to all.
5(c) 'The teaching in Jesus' parables was not meant for everyone.' 8
To what extent do you agree? Show in your answer that you have
considered more than one point of view.
The parables were unlike other methods that Jesus used in his teaching. It
was because he spoke in plain terms that could be understood that people
preferred his teaching and listened to him. However, despite Jesus plain
teaching there would always be the people who would not make the least
effort to understand, and these are the ones Jesus said would not pay
enough attention/or understand his parables.
Also, in Christian tradition, they are seen as timeless and can be interpreted
and applied to any age and situation, so parables are teachings for
everyone.
6(a) Give an account of what happened when Peter said that he did not 6
know Jesus.
Matthew 26:69−75
Now Peter was sitting out in the courtyard, and a servant−girl came to him.
‘You also were with Jesus of Galilee,’ she said. But he denied it before them
all. ‘I don’t know what you’re talking about,’ he said.
Then he went out to the gateway, where another servant−girl saw him and
said to the people there, ‘This fellow was with Jesus of Nazareth.’ He denied
it again, with an oath: ‘I don’t know the man!’
After a little while, those standing there went up to Peter and said, ‘Surely
you are one of them; your accent gives you away.’ Then he began to call
down curses, and he swore to them, ‘I don’t know the man!’
Immediately a cock crowed. Then Peter remembered the word Jesus had
spoken: ‘Before the cock crows, you will disown me three times.’ And he
went outside and wept bitterly.
Throughout the Gospel Matthew draws attention to Peter, the disciple. The
portrayal of Peter in the Gospel shows him to be impetuous and brave. He
made a brave attempt to follow Jesus on the water, but his faith turned to
fear and Jesus had to help him.
Candidates might use material from part (a) and other parts of the Gospel to
show other instances of this pattern of Peter’s character as shown in his
behaviour. He was the first to make the memorable declaration that Jesus
was the Messiah and was praised for having faith and the qualities to lead
the future church. At the Mount of Olives, he rashly declares to Jesus: ‘Even
if I have to die with you I will never disown you,’ which is a promise that he
breaks the very same night when he betrays Jesus by claiming not to know
him.
Peter is portrayed as all too human, with human weaknesses and at times
he fails in faith and loyalty, but he is singled out (by Jesus) as ‘a rock’ on
which the church will be built. Other example(s) might be used.
However, it might also be argued that Jesus’ destiny was preordained. So,
therefore, the role of the disciples was preordained: to desert him in his hour
of need, as Jesus predicted.