Guide 83
Guide 83
Guide 83
This writing guide was downloaded from the Writing@CSU website at Colorado State University
on April 15, 2024 at 8:30 AM. You can view the guide at https://writing.colostate.edu/guides
/guide.cfm?guideid=83. Copyright information and a citation can be found at the end of this
document.
The scientific paper has developed over the past three centuries into a tool to
communicate the results of scientific inquiry. The main audience for scientific
papers is extremely specialized. The purpose of these papers is twofold: to present
information so that it is easy to retrieve, and to present enough information that the
reader can duplicate the scientific study. A standard format with six main part helps
readers to find expected information and analysis:
There are many ways to approach the writing of a scientific paper, and no one way
is right. Many people, however, find that drafting chunks in this order works best:
Results, Discussion, Introduction, Materials & Methods, Abstract, and, finally, Title.
The title should be very limited and specific. Really, it should be a pithy summary of
the article's main focus.
Abstract
This is a summary of your article. Generally between 50-100 words, it should state
the goals, results, and the main conclusions of your study. You should list the
parameters of your study (when and where was it conducted, if applicable; your
sample size; the specific species, proteins, genes, etc., studied). Think of the
process of writing the abstract as taking one or two sentences from each of your
sections (an introductory sentence, a sentence stating the specific question
addressed, a sentence listing your main techniques or procedures, two or three
sentences describing your results, and one sentence describing your main
conclusion).
Example One
Brown, Donna M, A.P. Provoost, M.J. Daly, E.S. Lander, & H.J. Jacob. 1996.
"Renal disease susceptibility and hypertension are under indpendent genetic
control in the faun-hooded rat." Nature Genetics, 12(1):44-51.
Example Two
Key words: Alaska, Alces alces, calf survival, moose, Nelchina, parturition
synchrony, predation
Testa, J.W., E.F. Becker, & G.R. Lee. 2000. "Temporal patterns in the survival of
twin and single moose (alces alces) calves in southcentral Alaska." Journal of
Mammalogy, 81(1):162-168.
Example Three
Sartorius, Shawn S., and Philip C. Rosen. 2000. "Breeding phenology of the
lowland leopard frog (Rana yavepaiensis)." Southwestern Naturalist, 45(3): 267-273.
Introduction
The introduction is where you sketch out the background of your study, including
why you have investigated the question that you have and how it relates to earlier
research that has been done in the field. It may help to think of an introduction as a
telescoping focus, where you begin with the broader context and gradually narrow
to the specific problem addressed by the report. A typical (and very useful)
construction of an introduction proceeds as follows:
1. Open with two or three sentences placing your study subject in context.
Examples
"Echimyid rodents of the genus Proechimys (spiny rats) often are the
most abundant and widespread lowland forest rodents throughout much
"Our laboratory has been involved in the analysis of the HLA class II
genes and their association with autoimmune disorders such as insulin-
dependent diabetes mellitus. As part of this work, the laboratory handles
a large number of blood samples. In an effort to minimize the expense
and urgency of transportation of frozen or liquid blood samples, we have
designed a protocol that will preserve the integrity of lymphocyte DNA
and enable the transport and storage of samples at ambient
temperatures." (Torrance, MacLeod & Hache, p. 64)
2. Follow with a description of the problem and its history, including previous
research.
Examples
"Although very good results have been obtained using polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) amplification of DNA extracted from dried blood spots on
filter paper (1,4,5,8,9), this preservation method yields limited amounts of
DNA and is susceptible to contamination." (Torrance, MacLeod & Hache,
p. 64)
In this section you describe how you performed your study. You need to provide
enough information here for the reader to duplicate your experiment. However, be
reasonable about who the reader is. Assume that he or she is someone familiar
with the basic practices of your field.
It's helpful to both writer and reader to organize this section chronologically: that is,
describe each procedure in the order it was performed. For example, DNA-
extraction, purification, amplification, assay, detection. Or, study area, study
population, sampling technique, variables studied, analysis method.
study design: procedures should be listed and described, or the reader should
be referred to papers that have already described the used procedure
particular techniques used and why, if relevant
Chromosomal DNA was denatured for the first cycle by incubating the slides in 70%
deionized formamide; 2x standard saline citrate (SSC) at 70ºC for 2 min, followed
by 70% ethanol at -20ºC and then 90% and 100% ethanol at room temperature,
followed by air drying. (Rouwendal et al., p. 79)
We considered seeds left in the petri dish to be unharvested and those scattered
singly on the surface of a tile to be scattered and also unharvested. We considered
seeds in cheek pouches to be harvested but not cached, those stored in the
nestbox to be larderhoarded, and those buried in caching sites within the arena to
be scatterhoarded. (Krupa and Geluso, p. 99)
Frogs were monitored using visual encounter transects (Crump and Scott, 1994).
(Sartorius and Rosen, p. 269)
Results
This section presents the facts--what was found in the course of this investigation.
Detailed data--measurements, counts, percentages, patterns--usually appear in
tables, figures, and graphs, and the text of the section draws attention to the key
data and relationships among data. Three rules of thumb will help you with this
section:
Remember to use table and figures effectively. But don't expect these to stand
alone.
Examples
Notice how the second sample points out what is important in the accompanying
figure. It makes us aware of relationships that we may not have noticed quickly
otherwise and that will be important to the discussion.
Do not repeat all of the information in the text that appears in a table, but do
summarize it. For example, if you present a table of temperature
measurements taken at various times, describe the general pattern of
temperature change and refer to the table.
"The temperature of the solution increased rapidly at first, going from 50º to
80º in the first three minutes (Table 1)."
You don't want to list every single measurement in the text ("After one minute,
the temperature had risen to 55º. After two minutes, it had risen to 58º," etc.).
There is no hard and fast rule about when to report all measurements in the
text and when to put the measurements in a table and refer to them, but use
your common sense. Remember that readers have all that data in the
accompanying tables and figures, so your task in this section is to highlight
key data, changes, or relationships.
Discussion
In this section you discuss your results. What aspect you choose to focus on
depends on your results and on the main questions addressed by them. For
example, if you were testing a new technique, you will want to discuss how useful
this technique is: how well did it work, what are the benefits and drawbacks, etc. If
you are presenting data that appear to refute or support earlier research, you will
want to analyze both your own data and the earlier data--what conditions are
different? how much difference is due to a change in the study design, and how
This section centers on speculation. However, this does not free you to present wild
and haphazard guesses. Focus your discussion around a particular question or
hypothesis. Use subheadings to organize your thoughts, if necessary.
This section depends on a logical organization so readers can see the connection
between your study question and your results. One typical approach is to make a
list of all the ideas that you will discuss and to work out the logical relationships
between them--what idea is most important? or, what point is most clearly made by
your data? what ideas are subordinate to the main idea? what are the connections
between ideas?
Eight tips will help you match your style for most scientific publications.
The following example needs more precise information. Look at the original and
revised paragraphs to see how revising with these guidelines in mind can make the
text clearer and more informative:
Before:
Each male sang a definite number of songs while singing. They start with
a whistle and then go from there. Each new song is always different, but
made up an overall repertoire that was completed before starting over
again. In 16 cases (84%), no new songs were sung after the first 20,
even though we counted about 44 songs for each bird.
After:
Each male used a discrete number of song types in his singing. Each
song began with an introductory whistle, followed by a distinctive,
complex series of fluty warbles (Fig. 1). Successive songs were always
different, and five of the 19 males presented their entire song repertoire
before repeating any of their song types (i.e., the first IO recorded songs
revealed the entire repertoire of 10 song types). Each song type recurred
in long sequences of singing, so that we could be confident that we had
recorded the entire repertoire of commonly used songs by each male. For
16 of the 19 males, no new song types were encountered after the first
20 songs, even though we analyzed and average of 44 songs/male
(range 30-59).
In this set of examples, even a few changes in wording result in a more precise
second version. Look at the original and revised paragraphs to see how revising
with these guidelines in mind can make the text clearer and more informative:
Before:
The study area was on Mt. Cain and Maquilla Peak in British Columbia,
Canada. The study area is about 12,000 ha of coastal montane forest.
The area is both managed and unmanaged and ranges from 600-1650m.
The most common trees present are mountain hemlock (Tsuga
mertensiana), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), yellow cedar (
Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and amabilis fir (Abies amabilis).
After:
The study took place on Mt. Cain and Maquilla Peak (50'1 3'N, 126'1
8'W), Vancouver Island, British Columbia. The study area encompassed
11,800 ha of coastal montane forest. The landscape consisted of
managed and unmanaged stands of coastal montane forest, 600-1650 m
in elevation. The dominant tree species included mountain hemlock (
Tsuga mertensiana), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), yellow cedar
(Chamaecyparis nootkatensis), and amabilis fir (Abies amabilis).
Although you will want to consider more detailed stylistic revisions as you become
more comfortable with scientific writing, two tips can get you started:
Really Hard to Read: "The smallest of the URF's (URFA6L), a 207-nucleotide (nt)
reading frame overlapping out of phase the NH2- terminal portion of the
adenosinetriphosphatase (ATPase) subunit 6 gene has been identified as the
animal equivalent of the recently discovered yeast H+-ATPase subunit gene."
More confusing: The epidermis, the dermis, and the subcutaneous layer are the
three layers of the skin. A layer of dead skin cells makes up the epidermis, which
forms the body's shield against the world. Blood vessels, carrying nourishment, and
nerve endings, which relay information about the outside world, are found in the
dermis. Sweat glands and fat cells make up the third layer, the subcutaneous layer.
Less confusing: The skin consists of three layers: the epidermis, the dermis, and
the subcutaneous layer. The epidermis is made up of dead skin cells, and forms a
protective shield between the body and the world. The dermis contains the blood
vessels and nerve endings that nourish the skin and make it receptive to outside
stimuli. The subcutaneous layer contains the sweat glands and fat cells which
perform other functions of the skin.
Bibliography
Copyright Information