SM Individual Assignment
SM Individual Assignment
SM Individual Assignment
Strategic evaluation
Strategic evaluation is the last step of the strategic management process, and comes
after the formulation and implementation of strategy.
Strategic evaluation is defined as the process of assessing the efficacy of the strategy
in achieving the organizational objectives. In other words, strategic evaluation checks
that whether or not the strategy that was selected and implemented has met the
organizational objectives. It can be regarded as the performance appraisal of
organizational strategies.
In an organization, strategic evaluation is done at all the levels to know whether or not
the results match with the defined organizational objectives. In general, all members
take part in the process of strategic evaluation; however, a major role is played by the
following participants:
Directors: Enact the official role of reviewing and screening the executive
decisions.
Chief Executives: Take the responsibility for all the administrative aspects of the
strategic evaluation and control process
SBU heads: Facilitate strategic evaluation at their respective levels and
divisions.
Financial Controllers: Help in the operational controls that involve budgeting,
reporting, and financial analysis.
Executive Committees: Take the responsibility of regular screening of the
performances of the employees with the set standards.
Middle Level Managers: Help in providing the information and feedback
regarding the performance of employees. These managers get the directions
from the top management for taking the corrective action.
Strategic Control:
Strategic control take into account the changing assumptions that determine a
strategy, continually evaluate the strategy as it is being implemented and take
necessary action and steps to adjust the strategy to the new requirement.
Strategic control regularly monitors the changes occurring inside and outside an
organization to update the strategies as per the required changes.
The time gap between the formulation and implementation of the strategy may
be substantial. It may be possible that the assumptions made while formulating
the strategy change at the implementation level due to changing organizational
and environmental conditions.
These systems can be formed by performing the steps shown in Figure below.
1. Establishing Sub-goals: Implies dividing the strategies into standards and targets,
so that a strategy can be evaluated easily
2. Creating Measurement Systems: Involves creating the procedures or techniques
for measuring the performance
3. Comparing the Actual Performance: Involves finding the gaps between actual
and desired performance,
4. Initiating the Corrective Action: Implies taking an action to cover the gaps
The BCG Matrix divides the portfolio into four quadrants, each representing a different strategic
outlook.
Stars
Stars represent products or business units with a high market growth rate and a high
relative market share. These are the growth drivers of a company's portfolio. Stars require
substantial investment to sustain their growth trajectory and capture the market's potential. While
they generate revenue, they also consume resources to fuel their expansion. Companies should
develop strategies to support and maximize the potential of stars, as they can become future cash
cows.
For example Tesla's electric vehicles (EVs) in the early 2010s. With a high market growth rate
and a dominant market share in the electric vehicle industry, Tesla was considered a star. The
company invested heavily in expanding its manufacturing capacity and charging infrastructure to
capitalize on the growing demand for EVs.
Cash Cows
Cash cows are products or business units with a low market growth rate but a high relative
market share. These offerings have reached maturity and generate significant cash flow for the
company. Cash cows typically have established customer bases and enjoy economies of scale,
resulting in healthy profit margins. Finance professionals should focus on sustaining and
extracting value from cash cows to fund other areas of the business.
Example Microsoft's Office Suite. Although the market growth rate for office productivity
software is relatively low, Microsoft's Office Suite dominates the market with a high relative
market share. This product line generates substantial revenue and profit, which supports the
company's investments in other emerging areas, such as cloud computing.
Question Marks (Problem Children)
Question marks, also known as problem children or wildcards, are products or business units
with a high market growth rate but a low relative market share. They require careful
analysis and strategic decision-making due to the uncertainty surrounding their potential.
Question marks may either become stars or fail to gain market traction. Companies need to
assess the viability and potential of question marks and allocate resources accordingly.
Example: Uber's food delivery service, Uber Eats, during its early years. With the rapid growth
of the food delivery market, Uber Eats had a high market growth rate. However, it faced intense
competition from established players like DoorDash. Uber had to strategically invest in
marketing and partnerships to gain market share and compete effectively.
Dogs
Dogs represent products or business units with both a low market growth rate and a low
relative market share. These offerings have limited potential and may not generate substantial
returns. Companies should evaluate dogs to determine if they can be revitalized or if divestment
is a more appropriate course of action.
Example: BlackBerry's smartphones in the mid-2010s. With declining market share and a lack of
innovation compared to competitors like Apple and Samsung, BlackBerry's smartphones became
dogs in the market. The company eventually shifted its focus to software and services.
There are four positions between the SPACE Analysis matrix’s Y-axis and X-axis. Each
end represents a sub-factor to which a value can be assigned between 0 and 6; for CA and
ES this is 0 to -6. The values of the individual factors are then noted on the axes in the
matrix.
There where the surface area is largest because of the value of these factors, is where the
best choice for a strategic plan will be. You can see the four strategic positions from the
SPACE analysis below. P(osition) and AC(tion) are also considered:
Conservative strategy
The conservative strategy is located between the company’s financial strength and the
competitive advantage. This is usually a stable organisation, with low growth.
The following actions would be potential options for a company in this position:
The aggressive strategy is located between financial strength and industry attractiveness.
This is a stable organisation that actively chooses to compete with similar businesses.
The following actions would be potential options for a company in this position:
Competitive strategy
https://www.google.com/search?
q=1.+Strategic+evaluation+and+control&rlz=1C1GCEB_enET1095ET1095&oq=1.%09Strategic+evalua
tion+and+control&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQI
RiPAjIHCAQQIRiPAjIHCAUQIRiPAtIBBzcxNmowajeoAgiwAgE&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
https://www.google.com/search?q=2.+What+is+the+BCG+Matrix
%3F&rlz=1C1GCEB_enET1095ET1095&oq=2.%09What+is+the+BCG+Matrix
%3F&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRiPAjIHCA
QQIRiPAtIBBzk3MmowajmoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://nisis.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/2/9/10295486/
bcg_notes__activity.pdf