100% found this document useful (1 vote)
33 views

Control Ch8

The document discusses solving several problems related to spring-mass-damper systems using concepts like natural frequency, damping factor, and damped natural frequency. It also covers stability analysis of systems using the Routh-Hurwitz criterion.

Uploaded by

Wunna Swe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
33 views

Control Ch8

The document discusses solving several problems related to spring-mass-damper systems using concepts like natural frequency, damping factor, and damped natural frequency. It also covers stability analysis of systems using the Routh-Hurwitz criterion.

Uploaded by

Wunna Swe
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

Solved problems: P-59

1. A single degree of freedom spring-mass-damper system has the following data: spring
stiffness 20 kN/m; mass 0.05 kg; damping coefficient 20 N-s/m. Determine
(a) undamped natural frequency in rad/s and Hz
(b) damping factor
(c) damped natural frequency n rad/s and Hz.
If the above system is given an initial displacement of 0.1 m, trace the phasor of the system for
three cycles of free vibration.
Solution:
spring stiffness, k = 20 kN/m
mass, m = 0.05 kg
damping coefficient, c = 20 N-s/m
(a) undamped natural frequency in rad/s and Hz
(b) damping factor
(c) damped natural frequency
initial displacement = 0.1m

√ √
3
k
ω n= = 20 × 10 = 632.46 rad/sec
m 0.05
ω n 632.46
f n= = = 100.66 Hz
2π 2π

c 20
ζ= = = 0.32
2 √ km 2 √ 20 ×103 × 0.05

ω d=ωn √ 1−ζ 2 = 632.46 √ 1−0.322 = 599.2 rad/s

ωd 600
f d= = = 95.49 Hz
2π 2π
−ζ ωn t
y ( t ) =A e = 0.1 e−0.32 ×632.4 t

2. A second-order system has a damping factor of 0.3 (undamped system) and an un-damped
natural frequency of 10 rad/s. Keeping the damping factor the same, if the un-damped natural
frequency is changed to 20 rad/s, locate the new poles of the system?
Solution:
damping factor, ζ = 0.3
undamped natural frequency, ω n 1 = 10 rad/s

undamped natural frequency, ω n 2 = 20 rad/s

ω d 1=ω n 1 √ 1−ζ 2 = 10 √ 1−0.32 = 9.54 rad/s

ω d 2=ωn 2 √ 1−ζ 2 = 20 √ 1−0.32 = 19.08 rad/s

P1 ,2=−ζ ωn 1 ± j ωd 1

= −(0.3 ×10)± j 9.54

= −3 ± j 9.54
P3 , 4=−ζ ωn 2 ± jω d 2

= −(0.3 ×20)± j19.08

= −6 ± j 19.08
ζ
tanβ =
√ 1−ζ 2
0.3
=
√1−0.32
= 0.3144
β = 17.45˚

Solved problems: P-66


1. Consider the system shown in Figure 1. To improve the performance of the system a feedback
is added to this system, which results in Figure 2. Determine the value of K so that the damping
ratio of the new system is 0.4. Compare the overshoot, rise time, peak time and settling time and
the nominal value of the systems shown in Figure 1 and 2.
Solution:

C( s) G( s)
=
R( s) 1+ G ( s ) H (s)

20 20
s (s+1) s (s +1) 20
= = =
20 s ( s+1 ) +20 s ( s+ 1 )+ 20
1+
s(s+ 1) s (s +1)

20
= 2
s + s +20
Compare with s2+2ζωns+ωn2
ωn2 = 20 , 2ζωn = 1
1
ω n=√ 20 ,ζ= = 0.112
2 √20

C( s) G( s)
=
R( s) 1+ G ( s ) H (s)

20 20
s (s+1+20 K ) s(s +1+20 K) 20
= = =
20 s ( s+1+20 K ) +20 s ( s+ 1+ 20 K )+ 20
1+
s(s+ 1+ 20 K ) s(s +1+20 K)
20
= 2
s + ( 1+ 20 K ) s+20

Compare with s2+2ζωns+ωn2


ωn2 = 20 , 2ζωn = 1+20K
(1+20 K )
ω n=√ 20 ,ζ= = 0.4 (given)
2 √ 20
K = 0.128

1−ζ 2 = −1 √ 1−(0.112) = 1.46


∅ 1=tan−1 √
2
tan
ζ 0.112

∅ 2=tan−1 √ = tan−1 √
2
1−ζ 2 1−(0.4)
= 1.16
ζ 0.4

ω d 1=ω n √ 1−ζ 2 = √ 20 × √ 1−(0.112)2 = 4.44

ω d 2=ωn √ 1−ζ 2 = √ 20 × √ 1−(0.4)2 = 4.09

Characteristic Figure 1 Figure 2


Maximum overshoot,
−πζ
70.18% 25%
√ 1−ζ 2
M p=100 × e
π− ∅
Rise time, t r= 0.38 0.48
ωd
π
Peak time, t p= 0.71 0.77
ωd
4
Settling time 2%, t s= 8 2.24
ζ ωn
Nominal value, steady state, c ∞ 1 1

Example:
K
4. Find the stability of the following system given by G ( s )= and H(s) = 1 using Routh-
s (s+1)
Hurwitz stability criterion.
Solution:
K
G ( s )= and H(s) = 1
s (s+1)
K
G(s) s (s+1) K K
T ( s )= = = = 2
1+G ( s ) H (s) K s ( s+ 1 )+ K s +s+K
1+
s(s+ 1)

Method I

B ( s ) = s2 + s+ K = 0; a n=1

a n−1=1

a n−2=K

∆ 1=a n−1 =1

∆ 2=
| an−1 a n−3
an a n−2
=
1
1 | K| = |K −0| = K
| 0

For stability; ∆ 1=1>0


∆ 2=K >0

∴ So, the system is stable for K¿ 0.


Method II

B ( s ) = s2 + s+ K

s2 1 K
s1 1 0
s0 A
−1
A= [ 0−K ] = K
1

s2 1 K
s1 1 0
s0 K .
There is no sign change in the first column if K¿ 0. Therefore, the system is stable for K¿ 0.

K
5. Find the stability of the following system given by G ( s )= and H(s) = 1 using
s (s+2)(s+ 4)
Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion.
Solution:
K
G ( s )= and H(s) = 1
s (s+2)(s+ 4)
C( s) G( s)
=
R( s) 1+ G ( s ) H (s)

K
s (s+2)(s+ 4) K K
= = =
K s ( s+ 2 ) (s +4 )+ K ( s¿¿ 2+2 s)(s +4 )+ K ¿
1+
s(s+ 2)(s+ 4)

C( s) K
= 3 2 2
R( s) s + 4 s +2 s +8 s+ K
K
= 3 2
s + 6 s +8 s + K

Characteristics equation of, B ( s ) = s +6 s +8 s+ K


3 2
=0
Method I
a n=1 , a n−1=6, a n−2=8, a n−3=K

∆ 1=a n−1 =6

∆ 2=
| an−1 a n−3
an a n−2
= || |
6 K
1 8
= (48−K )

| || |
an−1 a n−3 a n−5 6 K 0
∆ 3= an a n−2 a n−4 = 1 8 0
0 a n−1 a n−3 0 6 K

=6 |68 K0|−K |10 K0 |+0


= 6 (8K−¿0) – K (K)

= 48K – K2

For stability, ∆ 1> 0 , ∆ 2> 0 , ∆ 3> 0

∆1 = 6 ¿ 0

∆ 2 = 48 – K ¿ 0

– K ¿ – 48

K ¿ 48

∆ 3 = 48K – K2 ¿ 0

K (48 – K) ¿ 0

K > 0 & 48 – K ¿ 0
– K ¿ – 48

K ¿ 48

The system is stable for 0 < K ¿ 48.

Method II

B ( s ) = s3 +6 s2 +8 s+ K =0
s3 1 8

s2 6 K

s1 A

s0 B

−1 48−K
A= [ K−48 ] =
6 6

B=
6
48−K
0+
[
( 48−K ) K
6
=K ]
s3 1 8

s2 6 K

48−K
s1
6

s0 K

48−K
¿0 & K ¿0
6

48 – K ¿ 0

– K ¿ – 48

K ¿ 48

There is no sign change in the first column if K > 0 &K¿ 48 . Therefore, the system is stable for 0
¿ K < 48.

6. Find stability of the following system given by B ( s ) = s3 +5 s 2 +10 s +3 using Routh-Hurwitz


stability criterion.

Solution:

B ( s ) = s3 +5 s 2 +10 s +3
s3 1 10

s2 5 3

s1 A

s0 B

−1 47
A= [ 3−50 ] = = 9.4
5 50

−1
B= [ 0−3 A ] = −1 [ 0−3 (9.4) ] = 3
9.4 9.4

s3 1 10

s2 5 3

s1 9.4

s0 3

There is no sign change in the first column. Therefore, the system is stable.

7. Find stability of the following system given by B ( s ) = s3 +2 s 2 +3 s +10 using Routh-Hurwitz


stability criterion.

Solution:

B ( s ) = s3 +2 s 2 +3 s +10

s3 1 3

s2 2 10

s1 A

s0 B

−1
A= [ 10−6 ] = −¿ 2
2

1 1
B= [ 0−10 A ] = [ 0−10(−2) ] = 10
2 2

s3 1 3

s2 2 10

s1 −¿ 2
s0 10

There is two sign change in the first column. Therefore, the system is unstable.

8. Examine stability of the following system given by s5 +2 s 4 +4 s 3 +8 s 2+ 3 s+ 1 using Routh-


Hurwitz stability criterion.

Solution:
5 4 3 2
s +2 s +4 s +8 s + 3 s+ 1

s5 1 4 3

s4 2 8 1

s3 A B

s2

s1

s0

−1
A= [ 8−8 ] = 0
2

−1
B= [ 1−6 ] = 5 = 2.5
2 2

s5 1 4 3

s4 2 8 1

s3 0 2.5

s2

s1

s0

Zero in first column. Multiply by (s+1)

( s ¿ ¿ 5+2 s + 4 s +8 s +3 s +1)¿ (s+1)


4 3 2

= s6 + s5 +2 s5 +2 s 4 +4 s 4 + 4 s 3 +8 s 3 +8 s 2 +3 s 2+ 3 s+ s +1

= s6 +3 s5 +6 s 4+ 12 s3 +11 s2 + 4 s +1

s6 1 6 11
s5 3 12 4

s4 A B C

s3 D E

s2 F G

s1 H

s0 I

−1
A= [ 12−18 ] = 2
3

−1
B= [ 4−33 ] = 29
3 3

−1
C= [ 0−3 ] = 1
3

−1
D= [ 29−24 ] = −5
2 2

−1 5
E= [ 3−8 ] =
2 2

F=
2
5[ ]
5 29
5+( × ) =
2 3
35
3

G=
2
5 [ ]=
0+
5
2
1

H=
35 2[
−3 −5 5 35
]=
−( × )
2 3
19
7

I=
−7
19 [ ]=
0−
19
7
1

s6 1 6 11

s5 3 12 4

29
s4 2 1
3

−5 5
s3
2 2

35
s2 1
3
19
s1
7

s0 1

There are two signs change in the first column.

∴ The system is unstable.

9. Examine stability of the following system given by s5 +2 s 4 +2 s 3 +4 s 2+ 4 s+8 using Routh-


Hurwitz stability criterion.

Solution:
5 4 3 2
s +2 s +2 s +4 s + 4 s+8
s5 1 2 4

s4 2 4 8

s3 A B C

s2

s1

s0

−1
A= [ 4−4 ] = 0
2

−1
B= [ 8−8 ] = 0
2

C=0

Zero in entire role.

Auxiliary equation A(s) = 2 s 4 + 4 s 2 +8

dA (s )
=8 s 3+ 8 s
ds

s5 1 2 4

s4 2 4 8

s3 8 8

s2 A B
s1 C

s0 D

−1
A= [ 16−32 ] = 2
8

−1
B= [ 0−82 ] = 8
8

−1 2
C= [ 8 −16 ] = −¿24
2

1
D= [ 0+8(24 )] = 8
24

s5 1 2 4

s4 2 4 8

s3 8 8

s2 2 8

s1 −¿24

s0 8

There are two signs change in the first column.

∴ The system is unstable.

10. Examine stability of the following system given by s4 +5 s3 +2 s 2 +3 s +2=0 using Routh-
Hurwitz stability criterion. Find the number of roots in the right half of the s-plane.

Solution:
4 3 2
s +5 s +2 s +3 s +2=0

s4 1 2 2

s3 5 3

s2 A B

s1 C

s0 D

−1
A= [ 3−10 ] = 7
5 5
−1
B= [ 0−10 ] = 2
5

C=
−5
7 [ 7
10−3( ) =
5
−29
7 ]
D=
7
29 [ 29
0+ 2( ) = 2
7 ]
s4 1 2 2

s3 5 3

7
s2 2
5

−29
s1
7

s0 2

There are two signs change in the first column.

∴ The system is unstable.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy