Getting High

WEB.indb 1 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Mature female flowering top.

WEB.indb 2 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High
Marijuana through the Ages

John Charles Chasteen

ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD

Lanham • Boulder • New York • London

WEB.indb 3 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Published by Rowman & Littlefield
A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc.
4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706
www.rowman.com

Unit A, Whitacre Mews, 26-34 Stannary Street, London SE11 4AB, United
Kingdom

Distributed by NATIONAL BOOK NETWORK

Copyright © 2016 by Rowman & Littlefield

All original illustrations by Jeremy Hauch.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by
any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval
systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer
who may quote passages in a review.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Chasteen, John Charles, 1955– author.
Getting high : marijuana through the ages / John Charles Chasteen.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4422-5469-5 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBN 978-1-4422-5470-1
(electronic) 1. Marijuana abuse—History. 2. Marijuana—History. I. Title.
HV5822.M3C43 2016
362.29'509—dc23
2015027167
™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of
American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper
for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.

Printed in the United States of America

WEB.indb 4 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 To the Riamba Bros.
actual and honorary
living and dead

WEB.indb 5 10/7/15 10:24 AM

WEB.indb 6 10/7/15 10:24 AM
 Contents

1 Getting High 1
Trouble with the Police 5
Meet the Cannabis Plant 12
2 American Century 17
The Early Years 20
The Marihuana Tax Act, 1937 23
Rise and Fall of the Counterculture 28
Drug War, Culture War 37
News Flash 42
3 Atlantic World 45
Hemp and Rum, Strategic Resources 46
Mexico, and a Mystery 50
Colombia and Jamaica 58
Brazil and the African Connection 64
Africa, South of the Congo 70
4 Medieval Hashish 77
Wine versus Hashish 79
Hashish in Muslim Society 82
God’s Unruly Friends 87
The Assassin Legend 94
Not for Everybody 99
5 Asian Origins 103
Historic India 103

vii

WEB.indb 7 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 viii Contents

The Prehistoric Eurasian Steppes 113

The Silk Road and Beyond 120
The Earliest Horizon 127
6 Epiphanies 133

Glossary 139
Sources and Asides 141
Index 147
About the Author 157

WEB.indb 8 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 1

Getting High

J ust wait until people our age are running things. Then everything
will change. My sixteen-year-old friends and I had no doubts in
the matter, around 1970. We assured each other, when we smoked
marijuana, that a new dawn was inevitable in a world that was
“turning on.” Marijuana, we believed, was a “mind-expanding”
drug, somewhat like LSD, but much milder. The distinction was
blurred, anyway, because we often used them together. We sup-
posed that anyone, particularly anyone young, would change
their attitude, spontaneously abandoning racism or support of the
Vietnam War, for example, under the mind-expanding influence
of the drug. Marijuana would help anyone see through sham and
resist mind control by “The System.” The problem was getting
them off booze, which dulled perceptions, rather than heighten-
ing them.
My sixteen-year-old friends and I viewed getting high and
getting drunk as rough opposites. Marijuana was the drug of
our tribe, the cool, long-haired, rock-music-listening, faded-blue-
jean-wearing tribe. Pot, as we called it most often, made people
peaceful. Alcohol belonged to the other tribe, exemplified by
hard-hat construction workers who drank beer and threatened to
beat up “long-hairs.” Alcohol stood for decadent tradition, and it
made people violent.

WEB.indb 1 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 2 Getting High

We were wrong, of course, about the world, and also about pot’s
irresistible persuasiveness. The world proved harder to remake
than we had ever supposed. And the clarity of the 1970 tribes soon
got muddled. By the 1990s, when I was a college professor sipping
wine at faculty parties, men with long hair seemed more likely
to be construction workers than students. Pot and beer no longer
seemed like opposites, either. Marijuana’s mind-expanding quali-
ties had gotten lost.
Did it ever really possess them?
This book looks at marijuana in the long view of world history.
It asks who used it, how, and why. Unlike most published versions
of the drug’s history, it places marijuana within larger historical
patterns, such as migration, colonialism, and religion. It also keeps
the marijuana/beer comparison in mind throughout. Above all, it
asks whether marijuana really possesses mind-expanding powers.
A simple question, perhaps, but without a simple answer. For
starters, the effects of the drug are variable and subjective. Con-
sider the complexities. The same dose can affect different people
differently, and the same person differently at different moments.
That’s true of alcohol, too, but truer of marijuana. Its effect will
vary according to expectations. To a degree, altered consciousness
is always a blank screen onto which people project their expecta-
tions. Expectations play an enormous role in people’s reaction to
any drug, of course, which is why placebos work. All this plays
havoc with our attempts to characterize marijuana’s mind-altering
qualities in the abstract.
To understand the effects of mind-altering drugs, it’s better to
ask how they are used in everyday life. Like alcohol, marijuana
is often used just for fun. That is because, like alcohol, it is a “eu-
phoriant” that triggers a surge of dopamine in the brains of users.
Many recreational drugs are euphoriants, but their effects vary.
The point of recreational use is simply to enhance the moment by
stepping out of ordinary consciousness. Often, the fact that drugs
somehow alter ordinary consciousness matters more than just how
they alter it. Recreational use is generally social. It facilitates inter-
personal bonding and generally greases the social gears. That is
why, like drinking alcohol, smoking marijuana is very commonly

WEB.indb 2 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 3

a collective activity. In the late-twentieth-century United States,

millions of people who smoked marijuana socially when they were
university students, drank alcohol socially later in life, getting fun-
damentally the same thing out of it, a shared experience of release
from the ordinary.
Still, the two drugs contrast in some respects. Alcohol depresses
the nervous system; marijuana does not. At high doses, the drinker
may experience difficulty walking or, famously, pronouncing
words, and may black out or even, in extreme cases, die. Mari-
juana does not have those effects even at high doses. Instead, it
creates distortions of normal perception and thought, as well as
measurable deficits in reaction time, cognition, concentration, and
memory. At high doses, it can produce visual hallucinations, such
as the strobing arm movements that made my teenage friends look
a little like Hindu deities. This is why pharmacologists tend to clas-
sify alcohol as a depressant, whereas they call marijuana’s cogni-
tive effects “hallucinogenic.” The hallucinogenic effects, not shared
by alcohol, seem to explain marijuana’s allegedly mind-expanding
qualities.
Scientific research now demonstrates that marijuana is a medical
drug, too. A hundred years ago we knew that, but we’d forgotten.
Cannabis has always figured in the pharmacopoeias of Europe and
China, although these traditional medical uses, such as hempseed
oil in the ear for earache, or cannabis-leaf poultices on a sprain,
did not involve getting high. In addition, the euphoriant effect,
when present, is a palliative that makes any ill more bearable. In
the twenty-first century, research has revealed further medical
uses. Marijuana’s unique active ingredients, called cannabinoids
(THC is the best known), have molecular shapes that fit recep-
tors in our body’s hormonal communication systems, regulating
mood and appetite, among other things. That’s how marijuana
can calm chronic seizures or restore appetite and reduce pain and
nausea in patients undergoing chemotherapy or enduring AIDS,
for example. At least one therapeutic cannabinoid molecule, called
CBD, is not mood-altering at all. Moreover, cannabinoids have
few deleterious side effects. There are pharmaceutical imitations,
but the synthetics do not seem to provide the same kind of relief.

WEB.indb 3 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 4 Getting High

Because experiments with cannabinoids led to the discovery of the

hormonal system they affect, researchers call it the “endocannabi-
noid system.” Note that this choice of name does not demonstrate
that the human hormonal system evolved in conjunction with
marijuana, however, as some have fantasized.
Ideas about the effects of marijuana have undergone several
dramatic shifts in recent history. In the 1930s—which is very recent
history on the global scale—marijuana was condemned by the U.S.
government and the mass media as a “devil weed” that drove users
criminally and violently insane. My teenage friends and I flocked
(high, of course) to see midnight showings of the 1930s propaganda
movie Reefer Madness, which by the 1970s seemed ridiculous to
pretty much everybody. The 1970s audience died laughing, but the
movie makers had been deadly serious. After all, Harry Anslinger,
the head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, had secured passage
of the 1937 federal law making marijuana illegal partly by showing
photographs of bloodied corpses—the typical work, he indicated,
of the “reefer mad.” He also deployed historical evidence, so to
speak, claiming that the English word assassin derives, ultimately,
from a sort of reefer madness that had existed in medieval Syria.
We’ll take a closer look at that idea later in the book. For now, let’s
note how absolutely the “assassin” image contrasted with that
of pot-smoking hippies preaching “peace and love” in the 1960s.
Then, by the 1980s and 1990s, another contrasting image emerged.
Now the stereotypical marijuana smokers became stoner “couch
potatoes,” antisocial and riddled with “amotivational syndrome.”
This variability is mostly a matter of social expectations, no
doubt, but pharmacology helps explain it somewhat. THC, short for
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, is apparently the most mind-altering
cannabinoid, but there are more than fifty others, at least three of
which are also psychoactive. Different strains of cannabis—even, to
a degree, individual plants—have differing endowments of canna-
binoids. Furthermore, they interact, so their differing endowments
create kaleidoscopic variations. (In contrast, a single molecule,
ethanol, is the sole active ingredient of all alcoholic drinks.) Today’s
cannabis connoisseurs, focusing on various strains sold as medical
marijuana, say that more sativa hybrids go to the head, make one

WEB.indb 4 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 5

“high” without impeding activity, while more indica hybrids register

in the body, making one more “stoned” and lethargic. Whatever . . .
Here’s the point. Marijuana is a mind-expanding drug when
(and only when) people learn to use it that way. My teenage cro-
nies and I did not invent such effects, nor did we discover them for
ourselves. Instead, we read about them in books and magazines,
heard about them on television and in the lyrics of rock music, be-
fore we ever tried marijuana. Perhaps the most influential descrip-
tion of the drug came from the poet Allen Ginsberg in his famous
1966 Atlantic Monthly article “The Great Marijuana Hoax,” which
he wrote partly high and partly not in order to demonstrate mari-
juana’s effects on his thinking. His overall idea was that marijuana
stimulates unconventional, and therefore creative, thought, which
is what makes it interesting to artists. It was an idea famously
shared by Jamaican reggae musicians, who believed that ganja, as
they called marijuana, opened their minds to divine inspiration.
Nor did Ginsberg and his generation make up this idea, of course.
Early jazz players, such as Louis Armstrong, had their own version
of it, as we will see. And so, too, did untold generations of ascetic
holy men of Central and Southwest Asia, Sufis and Sannyasins
who renounced the world in their spiritual quest.
In fact, when one looks at who’s been using cannabis drugs in
the last two or three thousand years, one sees that they have been
mostly spiritual, rather than recreational, users. In other words, the
drug has been prized more as a hallucinogen than a euphoriant.
Cannabis use as a recreational euphoriant has, in fact, been rare
in global history, concentrated in a few societies, never rivaling
the social importance of alcohol. Recreational use of marijuana
is rather modern, occurring most widely during the last century,
whereas the spiritual uses are much older. In sum, the big picture
of world history suggests that human beings have used marijuana
most often as a mind-expanding drug.

TROUBLE WITH THE POLICE

Why, then, is marijuana illegal? That’s the first question that any
reasonable person is likely to ask at this point, and it deserves a

WEB.indb 5 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 6 Getting High

straight answer. How did this very ancient and widespread crop,
one of humankind’s original domesticated plants, become banned
more or less worldwide? The gist of the answer lies in the next
chapter.
For now, contemplate the dramatic impact of today’s anti-mar-
ijuana laws. The drug’s general illegality is among the first things
anyone learns about it. In my case, as a middle-class American
kid, I learned it from the 1960s televised detective series Dragnet,
and then from the local broadcast news report, which ominously
showed the house of family friends as a crime scene. Marijuana’s
illegality constitutes a major reason why the United States now
keeps more of its population in prison, by far, than other countries.
Roughly half of the drug offenses tabulated annually by the FBI
involve marijuana, and roughly half the inmates in federal peni-
tentiaries are there for selling or, sometimes, for merely possessing
it. The rampant incarceration associated with the “drug war” has
weighed particularly on minority communities in the United States.
Some police departments in the United States have begun routinely
to seize the property of people accused of possessing marijuana,
and they often keep the property without filing formal charges. In
essence, it’s an institutionalized form of bribery and police corrup-
tion: “You had marijuana in your car, so we’ll keep both marijuana
and car, and you’ll say nothing or face drug charges.” The main
evidence of criminal activity landing many young New Yorkers
in jail, when they are profiled and then “stopped and frisked,” is a
small amount of marijuana. The pervasive drug-testing programs
maintained by many businesses effectively target only marijuana,
which is detectable in the blood for a month, whereas the traces of
other drugs disappear after a few days.
Since the 1970s, U.S. federal law has retained marijuana on its list
of most-prohibited “controlled substances,” those that it is a crime
merely to possess and cannot be consumed under any circum-
stances. Despite advances in scientific understanding of the body’s
endocannabinoid system, federal law still specifies that marijuana
has “no currently accepted medical use.” This is the wording of the
Controlled Substances Act, which lists marijuana in its “most dan-
gerous” category, Schedule I, reserved for drugs that also produce

WEB.indb 6 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 7

“potentially severe psychological or physical dependence.” Mean-

while, state laws have begun to vary, beginning with California’s
Compassionate Use Act of 1996, the first to permit possession and
use of marijuana by a doctor’s prescription.
The Compassionate Use Act emerged quite specifically in the
wake of California’s AIDS epidemic. About a dozen mostly west-
ern states followed suit in the early 2000s. By 2014, four western
states—Washington, Oregon, Colorado, and Alaska—had legal-
ized recreational use of the drug. The advent of the twenty-first
century seemed to mark a turning point in the country’s approach
to marijuana.
Still, state initiatives to license and tax marijuana dispensaries
are creating tension with the federal Drug Enforcement Adminis-
tration, which refuses to recognize the dispensaries’ state and local
licenses. Diverse observers have noticed that some of the young
men buying medical marijuana do not seem very sick. Moreover,
serious considerations arise from the problem of producing legal
marijuana for legal consumers. Various state laws have made pro-
vision for medical marijuana patients to grow a small number of
plants for themselves. Mostly, however, the supply comes from
licensed dispensaries, which buy marijuana from farmers (or in-
door horticulturalists) whose activities are sometimes licensed and
sometimes not. Decriminalization and legalization clearly stimu-
late demand, and demand stimulates supply.
Supplying the demand created by millions of U.S. marijuana
consumers—recreational and medical—has become a multimil-
lion-dollar business. The demand is being met mostly by do-
mestic production, both indoors and outdoors, in many states,
especially western ones. Related growth is occurring north of the
Canadian border in British Columbia. U.S. “homegrown” was
once the worst-quality marijuana, but since the 1980s, domestic
growers have crossed and selectively bred varieties of marijuana
to an unprecedented degree, making U.S. (and Canadian) pot the
most potent (and costly) anywhere. At many hundreds of dol-
lars an ounce, its new price constitutes a radical departure from
historical patterns. Many players, including some major corpora-
tions, are eyeing the market.

WEB.indb 7 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 8 Getting High

Until the drug war, marijuana had always been inexpensive

when compared with, say, beer. Now, thanks to vigorous efforts to
eradicate the burgeoning domestic crop and interdict illegal impor-
tation, high-grade marijuana retails for many dollars a gram. The
vast resulting profits have attracted ruthless criminal organizations
capable of building their own telecommunications networks and
digging freight tunnels under the border between Tijuana and San
Diego. Prohibition of marijuana has become a bonanza for orga-
nized crime, precisely as occurred in the 1920s with the prohibition
of alcohol, except that these new mafias operate internationally.
Various criminal trade cartels originating in Jamaica, Colombia,
Venezuela, and, more recently, Mexico and Central America have
become powerful enough to threaten the integrity of these coun-
tries’ governments. Turf wars among criminal traffickers produce
horrific bloodshed. In recent years, the violence has been most in-
tense in Mexico and Central America, as various militarized crimi-
nal syndicates vie with one another to supply the U.S. market. The
U.S. market is their major market, too. The level of consumption in
Mexico—as measured by “annual prevalence,” the proportion of
the population that uses it at least once a year—is about a tenth of
the U.S. level, according the UN World Drug Report.
Increasingly, state-level legalization makes the mayhem of the
drug war look irrational. While attitudes have fluctuated since the
1960s, reliable opinion surveys have found that by 2013 a grow-
ing majority of Americans, especially the young, believed that
marijuana should be legalized. A substantial older, more rural, and
more religious minority remains quite opposed, however, and “re-
scheduling” marijuana at the federal level seems unlikely in an era
of Republican political hegemony. State-level initiatives have been
notably rare in culturally conservative southern and midwestern
states. The West, instead, with its countercultural and also libertar-
ian traditions, has led the way. Medical marijuana initiatives and
subsequent legalization of recreational use did not emerge from a
cultural vacuum. For example, the author of California’s landmark
1996 medical marijuana law, Dennis Peron, was a San Francisco
gay-rights activist whose dying partner had been incarcerated for
use of marijuana. To judge by the rapid multiplication of licensed

WEB.indb 8 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 9

dispensaries, smoking marijuana was already pretty common in

the communities where they have opened.
Despite changing attitudes, we may well see an enduring split
between red states and blue and a standoff at the federal level.
Forty years ago, the National Commission on Marihuana and
Drug Abuse reached the conclusion that, when it came to its
status in the United States, the drug’s main sins were essentially
political. It’s still true. The Shafer Commission, so called for its
Republican chairman, named by President Nixon, was the federal
government’s most notable attempt ever to decide the legal status
of marijuana by thoughtful study. This panel of medical experts
found occasional recreational use of marijuana to be relatively
safe, although it was concerned about the much smaller number of
daily users. Its members worried, too, that marijuana might lead
to experimentation with “harder” drugs, particularly heroin. The
commissioners found in marijuana use no social harms, in other
words, to rank with alcoholism. At the end of their deliberations,
however, wavering between decriminalization and outright legal-
ization, they bowed to public opinion. According to their survey
data, in the early 1970s an ample majority of Americans viewed
marijuana as simply wrong and “a rejection of enduring Ameri-
can values.” That decided the commissioners against legalization.
Instead, the Shafer commission recommended the decriminalization
of marijuana use, whereby people would not be prosecuted for us-
ing or possessing small quantities, while commercialization would
remain criminal, as had been the case with alcohol in the 1920s.
But the commission’s recommendation fell on deaf ears. Faced
with a conflict between science and the instincts of his political
base, the president who had appointed the Shafer Commission
simply ignored its findings. By that time, he had already preemp-
tively declared a “War on Drugs.”
Meanwhile, the old idea of “reefer madness” has been defini-
tively discarded, along with the old idea of marijuana’s addic-
tiveness. This was a big change from the early twentieth century,
when marijuana was called a “narcotic,” a loose category that then
included cocaine, too. The idea of addiction was then popularly
associated with all “narcotics.” The real narcotics—opium and its

WEB.indb 9 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 10 Getting High

“opiate” derivatives morphine and heroin, as well as synthetic

“opioids”—truly are addictive. They produce physical withdrawal
symptoms when suddenly discontinued, “cold turkey.” Since the
1960s, researchers have recognized that marijuana does not create
that kind of “physical addiction.”
Some still suggest that marijuana can nonetheless be habit-
forming, and they are surely correct. To satisfy any kind of craving
can be habit-forming. There need not be any drug involved. Recent
experimental science is able to see habits forming at the molecular
level, so to speak. It turns out that our brain’s response to euphori-
ant drugs resembles our brain’s response to substances like “com-
fort foods” and activities like gambling and sex. Habitual stimula-
tion of the brain’s “pleasure circuit” centers over time “hardwires”
neurological circuitry toward the source of stimulation. Simultane-
ously, though, it also buffers neuronal transmissions at the syn-
apses, thereby encouraging similar—and more intense—stimula-
tion. What was once called “psychological dependence” can now
be understood as a neurological process by which people become
oriented toward a particular source of pleasure, be it marijuana or
alcohol, tobacco or pornography, roulette or bacon.
Given current scientific knowledge, federal prohibition of mari-
juana lacks any logical basis. Federal scheduling incorrectly
declares the drug to have no medical applications. Alcohol and
tobacco both present greater health risks. The most persuasive
arguments against legalizing marijuana focus on children, because
of their evident greater vulnerability than adults. Psychologists
have described juvenile amotivational syndrome, a socially isolat-
ing, long-term dependence that leads to apathy, bad grades, poor
choice of friends, and emotional alienation from parents. Amoti-
vational syndrome figures prominently in parent-centered cam-
paigns against drug abuse. Another discredited but persistently
evoked threat to children is that of the hypothetical “gateway
drug,” admitted to be more or less harmless in itself but threaten-
ing because it leads to “harder” drugs, such as heroin.
Clearly, drugs in general are bad for children, but the idea that
marijuana inherently threatens them more than alcohol or tobacco
is just fear-mongering. An illegal gateway drug is more easily

WEB.indb 10 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 11

sampled by young people, because buying illegal drugs requires

no age identification. Illegality itself constitutes the gateway to be
entered. Once inside the gate, one grows used to breaking the law
and encounters various other drugs in the illegal marketplace. Take
away the illegality, and the gateway disappears. Amotivational
syndrome and the gateway-drug idea are effective anti-marijuana
arguments, not because they are strong arguments, but because
they are about protecting the young, an area where we want to err
on the side of caution. They are really not specifically about the
effects of marijuana. In fact, a hundred years ago, protecting the
young was a principal argument for the prohibition of alcohol.
Which brings us to the last-ditch argument against marijuana.
This argument begins by admitting marijuana to be no worse than
alcohol and by recognizing the failed experience of national Prohi-
bition in the 1920s. Nonetheless, continues this line of argumenta-
tion, we should strive to feel “high on life” without any chemical
“crutch.” Legalizing other recreational drugs will “send the wrong
message” to young people because—and here’s the nub—eupho-
riant drugs are bad. They distract people from the path to true
happiness. We should strive for a “drug-free society.” Whether or
not it mentions religion, this argument is based on moral values
derived from religious faith. Many Christians, Muslims, and even
Buddhists share this idea. Reasonable people can disagree, but
this attitude of moral censure is politically potent, especially in the
United States. It’s rather reminiscent, in my view, of the sentiment
that persuaded the Shafer Commission not to recommend legaliza-
tion of marijuana in the 1970s.
A final impact of marijuana’s current illegality has more practical
than moral ramifications. Not all cannabis is marijuana. The distinc-
tive five-pointed compound leaf so well known in the United States
as marijuana also belongs to common hemp, which does not possess
enough cannabinoids to get anyone high. The currently accepted
scientific name of both marijuana and hemp is Cannabis sativa. The
men who wrote the 1937 law making marijuana effectively illegal
did not differentiate it from hemp. They defined “marihuana” as
“all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa.” The result was to abolish the
well-established U.S. hemp crop overnight, except for a brief fed-

WEB.indb 11 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 12 Getting High

eral program that encouraged growing “Hemp for Victory” during

World War II. Today, processed hemp fiber and hempseed oil can
be imported from Canada and several European countries, as can
sterilized hempseed for bird food, but hemp itself can still not be
grown in the United States. Proponents of hemp legalization have
good (although frequently overblown) arguments to make in favor
of the crop, which has many applications. The arguments against
legalizing it still cite the difficulty of telling hemp and marijuana
apart. What, exactly, is the difference? To trace marijuana’s progress
around the world, we will have to know it when we see it.

MEET THE CANNABIS PLANT

Hemp was wrongfully incriminated in 1937, so to speak, by its

close botanical relationship to marijuana. The hemp form of can-
nabis had been a common crop in Europe, and then in the United
States, for centuries. Never, before the 1900s, however, did it occur
to anyone that a drug could be derived from domestic European
hemp. To see why, you have to watch the plant grow.
Plant cannabis seeds close together, and the seedlings race up-
ward toward the sunlight in competition with each other, becom-
ing mostly stem. A hemp crop looks a little like a field of skinny,
tangled, impossibly dense, ten-foot-tall bamboo. Hemp farmers
grow their crop for the long, cane-like stem, because that’s where
the fibers are. Plant cannabis seeds far apart, on the other hand,
and the result is less stemmy, much shorter, more like a bush, with
denser foliage and more developed flowers. Marijuana farmers
grow their crop for the flowers, especially, because that’s where the
cannabinoids are concentrated. Almost no one smokes cannabis
leaves, particularly no one with access to the flowers.
A further complication: only female flowers will do. Unlike most
plants, which have pistils and stamens in the same flower, canna-
bis has them in separate flowers and, almost always, on separate
plants. Pollen tumbles out of tiny, pale yellow, bell-shaped male
flowers and is carried by the wind to the female flowers, which are
hard to recognize as such. Wind-pollinated plants don’t have to

WEB.indb 12 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 13

attract insects with nectar or colored flower petals. The female can-
nabis flower is a greenish cluster of slender, feathery, translucent
tendrils, called stigmas, which reach out a few millimeters hoping
that floating pollen will come to rest on them. On and around the
clusters of stigmas the blooming plant exudes a resin rich in can-
nabinoids.
If the flowers are pollinated, they stop blooming, produce no
more resin, and go to seed. To grow a crop of abundantly blooming
female plants, marijuana farmers cull male plants. In the males’ ab-
sence, the never-to-be-pollinated female plants gamely persevere,
producing more and more groping tendrils and more sticky resin,
until finally they give up the ghost, leaving, at the end of each
branch, a dense and withered clump of rust-colored stigmas and
resinous crystals without seeds, a sin semilla bud. The clusters of sin
semilla buds at the top of a single large plant can retail today in the
United States for many thousands of dollars.
Marijuana and hemp are above all crops, products of cultivation.
A cannabis plant only produces sin semilla (and all medical-grade
marijuana is sin semilla) if the males are culled, as we have seen.
Hemp farmers, on the other hand, grow both male and female
plants. They harvest most of the crop before it flowers, because
flowering takes the plant’s energies and degrades the fiber. They
do allow a portion of the crop to flower and make seeds for next
year’s crop. As wind-born hemp pollen blows through the thicket,
the female flowers go to seed and shut down. No groping stigmas,
no swelling buds, no spicy scent of resin, no rich payload of can-
nabinoids. No sin semilla, in other words, nothing remotely like it,
in any phase of hemp cultivation. Cultivation, then, is the defining
difference between marijuana and hemp, but it isn’t the only dif-
ference.
There are also environmental components. It takes plenty of
heat and sunshine, with a particular timing, to produce good
marijuana. Until the invention of grow lights, it was almost im-
possible to grow marijuana in a high-latitude climate like that of
Europe. Hemp, yes, all you want. Marijuana, no. That’s because
the cannabis plant only starts to bloom when the hours of light
and darkness equalize at the autumnal equinox. A cannabis

WEB.indb 13 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 14 Getting High

plant takes five or six weeks to flower fully, and the more hot,
sunny days there are during the plant’s flowering, the denser
and more resinous the buds become and the more cannabinoids
they contain. In fact, the resin may be, among other things, a pro-
tection against dehydration, a sort of sunscreen for the plant’s
delicate reproductive organs. That means that a seed planted in
India, for example, or anywhere in the tropics, has a much better
chance of developing drug potency compared with an identical
seed planted in a cool, high-latitude climate where it will grow
exuberantly on the long summer days but will blossom only
minimally when heat and sun dwindle away quickly after the
equinox. That is why we associate marijuana with hot climates
in the global south, while the world’s chief hemp growing areas,
in contrast, are cooler and more northerly.
Finally, although marijuana and hemp have a common origin,
there is a genetic difference between them. Contrasting cultivation
has created contrasting strains, mutually exclusive populations, as
hemp farmers and marijuana farmers worked in isolation from one
another over thousands of years. Always, the former selected for
tall, strong stems and the latter, for large, resinous buds. The result
was a series of strains with genetic endowments distinct enough
that they have sometimes been considered separate species. Still,
bring them back into geographical proximity with one another,
and they cross-pollinate automatically—so much so that, in geo-
graphical proximity, they ruin each other by cross-pollinating. For
that reason marijuana and hemp do not go together, historically.
Europeans and Chinese have grown hemp for many centuries
without producing any cannabis drugs, without even realizing,
most of the time, that cannabis could be a drug.
We have historical snapshots of very separate strains from
two famous eighteenth-century botanists. Linnaeus himself de-
scribed a northern European domestic hemp strain and called it
Cannabis sativa as part of his new binomial system of scientific
nomenclature in the 1750s. A few decades later, another Euro-
pean naturalist, Lamarck, described an Indian drug-producing
bush with an almost identical leaf, and believing that it was
different enough to constitute a separate species, he named

WEB.indb 14 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Getting High 15

it Cannabis indica. (A twentieth-century Russian botanist later

described and named an uncultivated ancestral Central Asian
variety, Cannabis ruderalis.)
There’s disagreement, these days, over whether to think of these
as distinct species or varieties of a single species, Cannabis sativa.
Cannabis plants certainly behave as though they are all one spe-
cies. Why conceptualize as members of different species plants
that, under normal conditions, form part of a single sexually

Sativa Indica Ruderalis

WEB.indb 15 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 16 Getting High

reproducing population? Any cannabis plant will pollinate any

other. Therefore the distinctness of the world’s varieties of can-
nabis has always been provisional, defined by cultivation, main-
tained by geographical separation, more historical than inherent.
Whatever clear distinctions had existed in the 1700s were blurring
by the 1800s, as Chinese varieties of hemp were introduced in the
United States and Europe. Today distinctions are blurring further
as clandestine growers in the United States and Canada, espe-
cially, have crossed sativa and indica strains to make a profusion
of hybrids.
The marijuana that first came to the United States around 1900
may have been a hybrid, too. Its origins are somewhat mysteri-
ous. Indeed, it seemed to come out of nowhere. The people who
brought it from Mexico called it marihuana, with an “h,” which was
the spelling used in the United States until the 1960s and which
remains the Spanish-language form of the word. Ironically, the
English-language spelling marijuana, with a “j,” seems to have been
established in the 1960s and afterward by people who, like me,
thought the “j” looked more authentically Spanish than the “h.”
Also, a lot of us had heard the story that the word marijuana derives
from a woman’s name, María Juana, which wasn’t true but also
seemed to favor the “j” spelling. And as long as we’re on trivia,
sometimes Mexicans called the stuff grifo, which is the probable the
origin of the “reefer” in Reefer Madness.
But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Marijuana became “the
world’s most used illegal drug” not because of its Mexican origins
but because of what happened to it in the United States. So we’ll
begin our retrospective journey in the twentieth-century United
States, before tracing marijuana use back, in successive chapters,
to its ultimate origins in prehistoric Central Asia.

WEB.indb 16 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 2

American Century

M arijuana first appeared in the United States around 1900, a

nice round benchmark year. It was a United States newly
emerging as a world power because of its victorious 1898 war
against Spain, a United States in temporary possession of Cuba
and the Philippines, which it had taken from Spain in the war. In-
ternally, this was the eve of the Progressive Era, when confidence
in enlightened government action ran high. A “drug-free society,”
though not a turn-of-the-century term, was one of the era’s impor-
tant goals. The decades-long struggle to eliminate the scourge of
alcohol had already triumphed in many state legislatures and was
gaining momentum nationally.
Progressives feared the effects of rapid immigration, urbaniza-
tion, and industrialization that had transformed the United States
since the end of its Civil War in 1865. It was a time of labor unrest,
and many progressives, who were overwhelmingly white, edu-
cated, middle-class, and native-born, felt threatened by the bur-
geoning population of working-class immigrants and by the for-
merly enslaved population of southern blacks, some of whom were
beginning to move north. They wanted to control the drug use of
both groups. The timing of marijuana’s arrival in this country with
the first appearance of its use by poor black and Mexican migrants

17

WEB.indb 17 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 18 Getting High

was therefore inauspicious, to put it mildly. In progressive eyes,

marijuana was a poison, plain and simple.
Many envisioned a titanic global contest among nations, which
people of 1900 tended to formulate as a clash of “races.” Most pro-
gressives thought of the United States as a racially “Anglo-Saxon”
nation, currently taking up the “white man’s burden” of benevo-
lent world domination (“spreading the benefits of civilization”)
from a declining Great Britain. Sea power was then the defining
military element in geopolitics, and the U.S. military thinking
called for U.S. coaling stations in Latin America and Asia, an ex-
panded U.S. Navy, and a Panama Canal to allow quick passage
between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Coastal defense was no
longer the navy’s only mission, however. In 1907, Theodore Roo-
sevelt, perhaps the most famous progressive of all, sent a “Great
White Fleet” of high seas battleships on a year-long trip around the
world “to show the flag.”
All this was closely linked to the idea of U.S. trade expansion into
Latin America and Asia. Following the severe depression of the
1890s, the captains of U.S. industry agreed that the United States
needed to open new export markets to absorb a glut of industrial
production that had surged fivefold between 1870 and 1900. Our
expanded “blue water” navy was to protect our roving merchant
marine fleet as it carried U.S. manufactures around the world. Our
acquisition of a naval base on the island of Cuba (Guantánamo
Bay) and of Manila’s coveted deep-water harbor at the doorstep of
China (ah, the fabled Chinese market!) must be understood in this
context. And so must the arrival of marijuana as yet another debili-
tating “vice,” a “narcotic” from beyond our shores, eating away at
the country’s moral fiber . . .
Progressive crusading mentalities shared, as a central tenet, the
belief that government action could improve society. Many pro-
gressives defined “better” through reference to their Protestant
faith. “We stand at Armageddon and we battle for the Lord,” in-
toned Theodore Roosevelt when he became the Progressive Party
candidate for president in 1912, and his followers marched around
the convention hall singing “Onward Christian Soldiers.” Reform-
ers spoke of a “Social Gospel” and of achieving the “Kingdom of

WEB.indb 18 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 19

God on Earth.” Poisonous drugs had no place in this vision of a

society perfectible through idealistic legislation and zealous en-
forcement. As leading arbiters of moral conscience in the Temper-
ance movement, women had a leading role to play in purifying
U.S. society of the most ancient and destructive poison of them all,
alcohol. Our great 1919–1933 experiment, Prohibition, was, among
other things, quite progressive.
Marijuana was a minor poison, by comparison with alcohol, in
the eyes of progressive proponents of a drug-free society. The
second most important drug historically and in the concern of
U.S. progressives was opium, smoked around 1900 by Chinese
immigrants and injected by millions of whites as morphine and
heroin. Opium was followed, on the alarm scale, by a lesser and
much more recent pharmaceutical menace, cocaine, present (like
opiates) in many patent medicines, and often associated in the U.S.
press with young black men. The most pervasive poisons were
those in adulterated foods and medicines, impurities denounced
by “muckraking” national magazine journalists. The 1906 Pure
Food and Drug Act is a landmark expression of official concern for
this toxic environment. The 1914 Harrison Act, the basis for U.S.
drug law for many decades, made opiates and cocaine controlled
substances, available only by medical prescription. The Eighteenth
Amendment and the Volstead Act finished the job, so to speak, by
getting alcohol off the streets nationally.
U.S. progressives also projected their reformist impulse interna-
tionally, with big implications for the global history of marijuana.
People in the U.S.-occupied Philippine Islands consumed large
quantities of opium, and because these people were ostensibly
being improved and groomed for self-government (the official
explanation for our occupation), U.S. authorities extended their
anti-poison crusade to colonial Asia, in which they gained the
enthusiastic support of Christian missionaries. The U.S. crusade
stood in marked contrast to the British example of allowing (when
not actively promoting) the Asian opium trade. Zealous U.S. diplo-
mats persevered in a series of international conferences, beginning
in the 1909 Shanghai Conference specifically on opium, continuing
through the 1920s, and culminating eventually in the UN Single

WEB.indb 19 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 20 Getting High

Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, which extended the current

regime of drug control around the world.
Where was marijuana in all of this? The twentieth-century U.S.
prohibition of marijuana sprang from an idealist impulse, as well
as from religious feeling and a tad of bigotry—but good intentions
went awry. Observe.

THE EARLY YEARS

Limited but clear evidence shows that people in the United States
first began to smoke marijuana cigarettes on the eve of World War
I. These pioneers were laborers recruited in Mexico during the
early 1900s to mine ore, maintain railroad tracks, and harvest crops
in the western United States. Other migrants soon followed on
their own initiative, seeking work. When Mexico’s great revolution
of 1910 began, the northern part of the country was a major battle-
field, dominated by the revolutionary general Pancho Villa. “La
Cucaracha,” the song famously sung by Villa’s followers, refers to
marijuana in its lyrics. Ten years of fighting probably encouraged
use of marijuana in a militarized Mexico, where it was regarded as
a soldier’s vice. Meanwhile, noncombatants fled across the border
to escape the fighting, often staying with relatives in the United
States until it was safe to return home.
The first piece of major historical evidence concerning use of the
new drug on this side of the border is an investigation conducted
for the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 1917. The investigator
reported that marijuana was common in south and west Texas,
whether homegrown, brought from Mexico by several companies,
or purchased in one-ounce packages from pharmacies and grocery
stores, some of which even advertised and sold by mail order. As
migrating workers moved north and west from Texas toward the
cotton fields and citrus groves of California, into the mining camps
of the Rocky Mountain states, and, eventually, into the industrial-
izing cities of the upper Midwest, they took marijuana with them.
It is hard to know what marijuana signified in their lives. Un-
questionably, though, its low cost constituted a powerful attrac-

WEB.indb 20 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 21

tion. Marijuana is naturally an inexpensive crop to grow, store, and

transport. A migrant laborer might spend in an afternoon drinking
beer money enough to buy marijuana for a month. Only illegality
would make marijuana expensive, and it was not yet illegal in the
United States. U.S. society as a whole had never heard of marijuana
in the 1910s, but Mexican (and Mexican American) society frowned
on the drug. They more than frowned. They even endorsed the
“reefer madness” image, whereby a few puffs of marijuana could
turn anyone at all into a homicidal maniac. The men who actually
smoked it obviously knew better, yet social disapproval led them
to keep their marijuana out of sight. I say “men” because there are
few reports of women smoking it, with the regular exception of
prostitutes. We have no good account of marijuana from this first
generation of smokers themselves. Middle-class Mexicans and
Mexican Americans called them marihuanos, a strongly uncompli-
mentary term. The state’s English-speaking power structure took
notice of marijuana only when a fight brought in the police. Such a
fight in El Paso, Texas, evidently led, in 1914, to the first municipal
ban on marijuana smoking in the United States.
The immigrants often lived isolated in mining camps, railroad
boxcars, or the rude housing provided for agricultural migrant
laborers. Mainstream white society regarded them with virulent
racism. Even when, in the 1920s, they began to find work in cities
like Chicago, differences of language, class, and culture limited
the social contacts of Mexican migrants. No wonder few whites
learned to smoke marijuana from them. Yet someone clearly did
learn. The basic U.S. marijuana-smoking customs of the 1960s, such
as passing around one cigarette, moistening it with saliva before
lighting it, and saving the unsmoked butt to recycle its contents,
were unquestionably introduced from Mexico.
Among non-Spanish speakers, those most likely to find them-
selves working alongside Mexican immigrants in the 1910s and
1920s were black laborers likewise attracted by marijuana’s low
cost. Marijuana appeared by 1920 among the black working class
in New Orleans, a city in close merchant shipping contact with
Mexico. During the first half of the twentieth century, Mexican
marijuana represented the great bulk of what was consumed in the

WEB.indb 21 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 22 Getting High

United States, and the consumers were brown or black, generally

young and male, too.
Among the blacks were a few hundred musicians who trans-
formed U.S. popular culture in the 1920s, and it is no exaggeration
to say that marijuana was part of the process. Jazz music, as it was
eventually called, had been created by black musicians in New Or-
leans at the turn of the century. Before the 1920s, the only way to
hear jazz was to go to the poor black dance halls of New Orleans or,
famously, its red light districts. Some jazz playing could be heard
on Mississippi riverboats that operated upriver, as well. Then came
the great migration of southern blacks to the industrial cities of the
Midwest and Northeast. New Orleans jazz could then be heard
on the South Side of Chicago. Adventurous white working-class
young people began to pay attention. New Orleans jazzmen who
had moved north to Chicago in the 1920s moved east to New York
City in the 1930s. Radio broadcast stations springing up across the
country and phonograph discs with one song on each side took jazz
to the masses. Jazz was becoming the national sound track, and be-
yond that, an international sensation of global modernity.
Early jazz music, condemned as lascivious, even infernal, by
the older generation, had clear affiliations with youth rebellion.
Early jazz was dance music, above all, and U.S. young people suc-
cumbed to a notable dance craze in the 1920s. “Modern girls” of
the 1920s, dance-floor “flappers,” wore their hair short and their
skirts high. They might even smoke tobacco and drink illegal li-
quor, which wasn’t hard to find. Alcohol, not marijuana, was the
principal intoxicant of the “Jazz Age,” perhaps ironically, given
that the music’s unstoppable rise in popularity coincided with na-
tional Prohibition, from 1919 to 1933. Smoking tobacco taught this
generation to inhale. Many of the musicians themselves preferred
to inhale marijuana, which they most commonly called reefer, for
reasons that you now understand. Jazz players smoked in and
around their performance venues, and often during their practice
sessions. A few songs even mention reefer in the title. Whether
or not reefer made them play better—they thought so—it made
them enjoy playing more. For jazz players, to smoke reefer was to
belong to a kind of secret brotherhood. Sometimes they used their

WEB.indb 22 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 23

elaborate slang, called “jive,” to mention reefer (as “muggles,”

“tea,” etc.) onstage, or even on recordings, an inside joke for other
“vipers,” as they called themselves. Being a viper was part of the
jazz players’ mystique.
Jazz involved a sort of improvisation and rhythmic “swing” that
could not be written down. And never, in the 1920s, could white
and black musicians play in the same band, which would have
been a sickening outrage according to the dominant racist sensibili-
ties of the day. At first, the only way for whites to learn jazz was to
seek out black jazz players, watch them perform night after night,
make friends with them, and get some pointers. Eventually, most
whites who learned to play jazz did so by wearing out the records
of the New Orleans musicians who had created the style, lifting the
phonograph needle over and over to repeat a particular passage.
Whether in direct association with black jazzmen or by a more
remote method, white musicians learned jazz by imitating black
musicians. For some, that imitation included reefer.
The association between jazz and marijuana can be exemplified
by the most influential trumpet player in global history, Louis
Armstrong. Armstrong grew up in the roughest parts of New Or-
leans and started playing his horn in an institution that was a cross
between an orphanage and a reform school. (He was sent there for
firing a pistol into the air on the street, a typical expression of high
spirits in his neighborhood.) Within a few years, he was part of
the first wave of New Orleans musicians to make the move north
to Chicago, and in the 1920s his recordings became widely copied
models that defined the new musical genre. Armstrong was a life-
long viper who liked his band to practice “high” and who, later in
life, after the national ban on marijuana, wrote a letter of protest to
President Dwight Eisenhower. By that time, the Federal Bureau of
Narcotics kept a file on Armstrong and on many other jazz players.

THE MARIHUANA TAX ACT, 1937

Marijuana was only one of several psychoactive substances legally

restricted in the early-twentieth-century United States, as we have

WEB.indb 23 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 24 Getting High

seen. When the derivatives of opium poppies and coca leaves be-
came controlled substances in 1915, however, marijuana did not.
Unlike cocaine and, especially opiates, the presence of this new
poison was incipient, limited, and localized—not yet a national
concern. The most abused substance of the early-twentieth-century
United States, meanwhile, was unquestionably booze.
Whiskey and hard cider had been omnipresent on the nine-
teenth-century frontier. Opposition to alcohol use had ebbed and
flowed during that century, and many states had banned the sale
of the drug well before national Prohibition. Historians agree that,
in addition to concerns about the dangers of alcoholism, fears of
immigrant drinking figured importantly in the national mood.
These were the same years, after all, in which immigration was first
restricted by congressional action.
Before national prohibition, a lot of drinking happened in the sort
of uproarious saloon familiar to modern viewers from cinematic
Westerns. In the industrial north of the United States and in the
Midwest, hard-drinking European immigrants frequented saloons,
which were also centers for political indoctrination and organizing.
This was a period in which European immigrants were suspected of
radical doctrines, such as Socialism and Anarchism. More often, the
political life of saloons turned on the exchange of votes for benefits,
namely, patronage, what these days we call “pork-barrel politics.”
Saloons seemed a big problem to progressive reformers of the early
1900s. Moreover, whether in Dodge City, Chicago, or Brooklyn, sa-
loons were a man’s world, venues in which the only women were
prostitutes. The famous activist Carrie Nation believed that she
obeyed a higher moral order when she smashed up saloons with an
ax. The Women’s Christian Temperance Union was an organization
of primary importance in building a national consensus for the pro-
hibition of alcohol. In general, the institution of Prohibition in 1919
coincided with, and partly resulted from, a rise in women’s political
engagement, including a woman’s right to vote, and protection of
children ranked high among women’s goals.
However, the Eighteenth Amendment, outlawing the manufac-
ture, transport, and sale of alcoholic beverages, is the only consti-
tutional amendment ever to be repealed. National prohibition of

WEB.indb 24 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 25

alcohol soon began to lose popularity because of its mortifying side

effects. The saloons disappeared, and consumption of the drug de-
clined by half, but millions of Americans continued to drink. Only
the commercialization of alcohol, not its consumption, had been
criminalized. The illegal manufacture, transport, and sale of alco-
hol became a multimillion-dollar business that energized criminals
and created a wave of gang violence. The rise of the modern mafia
confounded reformers who had promised that controlling drugs
would reduce crime. Drinking clubs called “speakeasies” multi-
plied in place of saloons. Unlike saloons, speakeasies were full of
jazz and women who weren’t prostitutes, full of gangsters, too,
who became jazz connoisseurs and hired many musicians for their
late-night carousing. Typically, when the police raided a speakeasy
for selling alcohol, they did not arrest the clientele for drinking,
which was not illegal per se. Still, people agreed that Prohibition
had brought widespread disregard for the law. The moral argu-
ments against alcohol had not changed, but gradually, during the
1930s, our sense of priorities and possibilities had. As the country
scraped into the depths of the Great Depression in 1933, it aban-
doned its “noble experiment” in moral improvement.
Compared to all this, marijuana was hardly an issue in 1933.
Most people in the United States did not know what it was. True,
its use seems to have risen during the prohibition of alcohol, but
mostly among poor black and brown people whose concerns
rated little national attention. Still, local lawmakers noticed and
reacted. By 1930, marijuana had been prohibited by law in many
states, beginning in Texas, California, and other western areas with
significant populations of Mexican descent. The creation of state
and local laws in the 1920s had elicited very little debate, perhaps
none at all. Such laws were advanced as simple matters of public
order: “Loco weed,” known to drive Mexicans violently and per-
manently crazy after three puffs, had been outlawed as a public
safety measure, end of story. The United States as a whole read the
word marihuana for the first time in exaggerated newspaper reports
that were, in some ways, exceedingly reminiscent of the earlier
“temperance noir” stories about violent crimes committed under
the influence of “demon rum.” Another area of early alarm and

WEB.indb 25 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 26 Getting High

Reefer Madness, 1936.

prohibition was Louisiana, where the New Orleans commissioner

of public safety began a campaign that garnered some national
attention. The trouble seems to have started there when a young
musician tried to forge a doctor’s signature on a prescription for
marijuana, which was available in the city for medical use.
More or less at that point, a veteran Prohibition-enforcement
agent named Harry Anslinger was appointed head of the newly
created National Bureau of Narcotics (FBN). Anslinger was as
committed a moral reformer as one could desire. He believed that
use of marijuana was wrong and very dangerous. He disliked the
black and brown people who used it, and he believed that they
were dangerous, too. From the time he became the country’s lead-
ing narcotics law enforcement officer in 1930, Anslinger worked
to raise public awareness of the marijuana menace through sys-
tematic publicity. The powerful Hearst newspaper chain, with its
strong anti-Mexican attitude, was his staunch ally. Anslinger’s

WEB.indb 26 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 27

anti-marijuana publicity incorporated various sorts of legendary

lore and press accounts of sensational crimes, especially those
which could be read as threatening “white womanhood.” One ear-
nest FBN pamphlet chronicled the marijuana-fueled depredations
of a “ginger-colored nigger.” Anslinger hated jazz and considered
jazz musicians to be corrupters of youth and vectors of the mari-
juana contagion. He did not single-handedly bring about federal
legislation against marijuana, which had already been outlawed
in many states, but when the Treasury Department introduced the
Marihuana Tax Act in Congress in 1937, Anslinger went to Capitol
Hill and made the argument for it.
Anslinger had no real expertise in the matter, and he based his
argument on his law-enforcement experience and a few newspaper
clippings about ax murders. He was able to pass as an authority
on marijuana only because so few people knew or cared about it.
Anslinger’s authoritative judgment was neither widely informed
nor guided by any sort of scientific information. In outlining the
marijuana menace, he made no reference to the U.S. government’s
most careful study of marijuana up to that point, undertaken in
1925 by U.S. Army investigators in the Panama Canal Zone. It
is not clear that he had even read the report’s conclusion, which
found marijuana use to be relatively harmless and had advised
against prohibiting U.S. soldiers from smoking it. The legislators
who passed the Marihuana Tax Act did not require much proof,
however, when Anslinger solemnly outlined the threat of “reefer
madness.” They did not hesitate even when a representative of the
American Medical Association impugned the scientific validity of
Anslinger’s testimony. Even after they voted, some seemed still not
quite sure what the insidious and highly addictive new “narcotic”
was. But why take a chance, after all, with a drug strongly associ-
ated with criminality, blacks, and Mexicans?
The Marihuana Tax Act boldly addressed the problem by mak-
ing all forms of cannabis effectively illegal nationwide. I say “ef-
fectively.” Technically the law applied the constitutional power to
tax interstate commerce by placing a prohibitively high tax on all
sales of cannabis. The law made no distinction between marijuana
and hemp. The distinction was not very well understood at the

WEB.indb 27 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 28 Getting High

time by anyone involved in lawmaking—and besides, hemp was

no longer a major U.S. crop in the 1930s. True, a new processing
machine had demonstrated the potential to reinvigorate the crop by
making hemp a source of cheap newsprint for the country’s myriad
daily newspapers. The promise of the new technology prompted an
article on the marvels of hemp in a national magazine, Popular Me-
chanics. But agricultural interests did not mount a defense of hemp
and, many industries, such as those producing pulpwood and syn-
thetic fibers, had no wish to see hemp reinvigorated. The country as
a whole took little notice of the 1937 act, before, during, or for many
years after its passage. Even Anslinger experienced an anticlimax.
Once he stopped sounding the alarm so vigorously, there proved to
be no actual crisis to confront, so he directed his attention to high-
profile users, such as Hollywood actors and jazz musicians.
Less than five years after the end of our national crusade against
alcohol, the country had taken a momentous step in the direction
of future drug wars. But the looming threat, a toxin reputedly incit-
ing murderous “reefer madness,” would prove totally bogus.

RISE AND FALL OF THE COUNTERCULTURE

The most notable reaction to the Marihuana Tax Act occurred

shortly thereafter in New York City, where mayor Fiorello LaGuar-
dia (who had read the Canal Zone report) commissioned a five-year
medical, sociological, and criminological study, the first in-depth
assessment of marijuana ever done in the United States. Marijuana
had been available in New York for about ten years, but the La-
Guardia Report found no evidence to support Anslinger’s assertion
that the new drug was addictive or that it drove users criminally
insane. Nor did the study’s careful school-by-school survey turn
up any indication that marijuana use by schoolchildren constituted
a significant problem, despite an alarmist outcry from concerned
parents. The researchers were shocked, on the other hand, at how
many schoolchildren were starting to smoke tobacco.
They also reported that Harlem and Spanish Harlem were the
parts of New York City most affected by marijuana, and that it

WEB.indb 28 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 29

was associated with jazz venues. A squad of undercover detectives

donned pullover sweaters and old shoes to explore the apartments,
called “tea pads,” where marijuana was smoked socially. Tea pads
were characterized by incense, dim lights, furniture to lounge on,
and a radio, phonograph, or nickelodeon for music. The detectives
found it easy to strike up conversations in a tea pad, where new
acquaintances frequently shared cigarettes. Tea-pad denizens liked
to philosophize in a manner that the detectives found out of keep-
ing with “the intellectual level” of such persons. Rowdiness was
not permitted, nor was sexual activity in evidence, despite the fact
that a tea pad’s walls were commonly decorated with erotic art,
apparently from the Kama Sutra. The detectives reported that most
people they saw smoking marijuana appeared to be unemployed
(this was 1939). Although they did not generalize about smokers’
sex or age, arrest figures reveal a clear profile: 90 percent male,
70 percent in their twenties or younger. No surprises there—but
interestingly, just under a quarter of those arrested for marijuana
were white.
The whites who frequented the tea pads of Harlem in racially
segregated New York were the beginnings of a transition. Jazz
was still part of what brought adventurous whites across the color
line, but now it was also marijuana itself. Here was the contagion
that so worried Anslinger. The New York detectives’ accounts of
tea-induced camaraderie and philosophizing, amid music, incense,
and erotic art prefigure the atmosphere of the counterculture. By
the late 1940s, a group of writers emerged to give the ethos of the
tea pads national projection. Many of these young men had met
not far from Harlem, at Columbia University, and all of them
were white, as most of their readers and imitators would also be.
They prided themselves on their unconventional lifestyles, and
that included “tea.” Eventually they became known as the Beat-
generation writers.
The Beats’ interest in jazz and Harlem tea fit easily into their
larger rebellion against conventional social norms. They had a
taste for Eastern philosophy, sexual experimentation, and mind-
altering substances. They somewhat resembled the English
Romantic poets—such as Coleridge, Keats, Shelley, and Lord

WEB.indb 29 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 30 Getting High

Byron—whose defiant bohemianism they admired. The most fa-

mous Beat writers were the poet Allen Ginsberg (Howl, 1956) and
the novelist Jack Kerouac (On the Road, 1957). They were nation-
ally influential, but more important than the writers themselves
were the larger phenomena to which they gave voice. The writ-
ers were hardly the only young, middle-class whites who had
become sympathetic to black culture, dismissive of mainstream
social norms, and eager to flout them. “Beatniks,” the young
admirers of Beat writers, cultivated a distinctive look, includ-
ing beards, dark sweaters, and sandals—a European appearance
emblematic of their disaffection with U.S. models. Beatniks “got
hip,” adopting elements of black slang heard at tea pads. Beatniks
were apt to smoke marijuana, too, perhaps while listening to jazz
or at a poetry reading. At the end of the 1950s, beatniks existed
mostly in a few large cities, notably New York and San Francisco.
Like the Beat writers, these new marijuana-smoking cultural
dissidents were apt to be white and middle-class. Their marijuana
smoking became independent of tea pads run by, and mostly for,
African Americans. But the rarity of beatniks—most people in the
United States never laid eyes on one except in a magazine—made
them remote and not very menacing. Then the Sixties happened.
By the 1970s, the lonely cultural dissidence represented by 1950s
beatniks had become a mass phenomenon and defined the inter-
vening decade—all, it seemed to some, in a cloud of marijuana
smoke.
To understand the rise of marijuana smoking as a mass phe-
nomenon in the 1960s, one must begin by observing the wave
that buoyed it up. The great demographic wave created by the
post–World War II baby boom swept into high school and col-
lege in the early 1960s. Youth itself, not childhood, but embattled
adolescence and headstrong young adulthood, set the tone for the
decade. Youth rebellion is a recurring phenomenon in history, but
far from a universal one. Most of the time, young people seem
willing to obey the norms and the leadership established by their
elders. Rapid social change tends to undermine the authority of
age and wisdom, however. The 1920s had displayed elements of
youth rebellion, as we have seen. The 1930s, though not a decade

WEB.indb 30 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 31

of generational rebellion, had contributed to the development of

a distinct youth culture because, in the absence of employment
opportunities, young people spent more years in school associat-
ing primarily with their peers. Then, what the Depression did for
high school attendance, post–World War II economic recovery and
prosperity did for college attendance. More peer culture. Postwar
prosperity helped young people to develop their separate cultural
identity—the sense that they did not share their parents’ values
and tastes—through more intensive consumption of age-specific
clothing and entertainment. This greater feeling of separateness,
when combined with youthful assertiveness and resources, made
challenges to age and authority notably common in the 1950s.
“What are you rebelling against?” someone asks Marlon Brando
in a 1953 movie. “Whattaya got?” he replies. A notable 1955 youth
movie was Rebel without a Cause. Causes aplenty soon appeared.
Civil rights, for one. The dramatic early struggles for African
American civil rights occurred just at this time. After fighting
against Nazi racism, the United States as a nation had begun to
look at southern segregation more critically. In 1954, the U.S. Su-
preme Court disallowed the “separate but equal” rationalization
of segregation, and soon the Montgomery bus boycott was under
way. Martin Luther King Jr. emerged to lead a national movement
that had a moral superiority obvious to everyone except southern
whites personally invested in segregation. The movement gained
national momentum, presidential support, world attention. In the
early 1960s, university students from the north participated in
“Freedom Rides” and voter registration campaigns in southern
states. Those inspired by this cause learned to apply the tactic of
civil disobedience, calmly resisting sheriff’s deputies in Mississippi
or Alabama in the name of a higher moral authority. Most of these
students had probably never tried marijuana, but the experience
certainly suggested to them that not all laws merited obedience.
Soon many would decide that, by the same token, not all wars
merited patriotic support. Vietnam divided the country infinitely
more than later conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. A New Left of
student radicals appeared, focused not so much, like the “Old” Left,
on organized labor, but rather, on questioning the anti-Communist

WEB.indb 31 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 32 Getting High

consensus of U.S. Cold Warriors. The beyond-liberal Students for a

Democratic Society, the national face of the New Left, was founded
in 1962. During that same year, the Cuban Missile Crisis reminded
the country of the threat of nuclear annihilation—a product of “old-
style” thinking, said the young radicals. In 1965, the United States
began the rapid escalation of its military involvement in Vietnam
that led to the deployment of troops. In 1966, students acquired a
more immediate reason to question the war when the government
stopped issuing automatic draft deferments to university students.
To students who opposed the war for whatever reason, the idea of
being drafted and sent to fight against their will provoked angry
protest. In the late 1960s, student protesters occupied buildings on
university campuses and organized major demonstrations around
the country.
A counterculture was emerging. As with the civil rights move-
ment, resistance to the Vietnam War encouraged a spirit of moral
outrage among its participants, a feeling of alienation and opposi-
tion toward not just a particular policy but an entire social, political,
and cultural system, which protesters called “The Establishment,”
“The System,” or even, for lack of anything more specific, “The
Status Quo.” There were no more rebels without a cause. Various
sorts of dissidence coalesced in a general attitude of opposition
and protest. Opposition to the war in Vietnam went together with
youth, a general proclivity to question social norms, support for
civil rights, and a respect for expressions of black culture, which
was part of a general interest in the world’s poor and downtrod-
den. The counterculture was not served à la carte. Rather, it was a
package deal, a group identity, a tribe.
The clearest personifications of that tribe were called “hippies”
in a San Francisco newspaper, and the name stuck. It referred to
the hip slang spoken by San Francisco beatniks who were coloniz-
ing a run-down neighborhood called Haight-Ashbury. “If you’re
going to San Francisco,” counseled the pop anthem of 1967, “be
sure to wear some flowers in your hair.” Many thousands of young
people went to Haight-Ashbury from across the United States to
become hippies without knowing much more than that song. It
wouldn’t be hard to find hippies, because you knew them when

WEB.indb 32 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 33

you saw them. Long hair made boys into hippies, as did faded blue
jeans, and the general look of a homeless waif. And sometimes no
underwear. “Hippie chicks” wore long “granny” dresses from the
used clothing store, without makeup or bras or, possibly, shoes.
Both sexes wore Native American beadwork, South American
fabrics, and African motifs. Most controversially, some hippies
wore clothing made out of the national flag or fabric resembling it.
That produced an angry reaction, as did a number of other hippie
traits. Hippies advocated “Peace and Love,” and pacifism seemed
unpatriotic and effeminate to many Americans during the Vietnam
War. Hippie love was brotherly love, of course, directed to those
on whom one refused to make war, but it was also free love. Make
love, not war! Middle America, as it was then called, looked on hip-
pie promiscuity with horror. Hippies seldom bathed, commented
“straight” America. And they wanted to live like “bums,” without
working! Many other hippie traits were controversial, too. Hip-
pies scorned material things—theoretically, at any rate—and they
might live without furniture, sleeping on mattresses on the floor.
They prized living spontaneously, making do creatively without a
silly full-time job, drifting here and there, hitchhiking or traveling
in an old Volkswagen bus, a life “on the road.” This fantasy of care-
free poverty was contradicted, of course, and also facilitated, by the
social origins of these young people. Hippies were only poor, for
the most part, when in conflict with their suburban parents.
Finally, there were drugs, of course. Hippies frowned on alcohol,
which they associated with loutish violence and lack of imagina-
tion, but they were open to anything else. Marijuana was by far the
most popular choice, but there were also pharmaceutical “uppers”
and “downers” that had been widely consumed for years, and
several sorts of hallucinogenic drugs: psilocybin (from “magic”
mushrooms), mescaline (from peyote cactus), and laboratory-
synthesized LSD, lysergic acid diethylamide, “acid” for short. The
point was to try them and see what one preferred. But the hallu-
cinogens—of which marijuana was the mildest and LSD the most
powerful—held a special countercultural significance because of
their reputed mind-expanding qualities. They were believed to
“deprogram” people made “robotic” by pervasive mass media of

WEB.indb 33 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 34 Getting High

“The System,” allowing them to experience the world in a manner

unfiltered by cultural conditioning. For crusaders who believed
that mind-altering drugs were the key to a better world, depro-
grammed ex-robots would recover their human potential. They
would be able to see through the myriad forms of social manipula-
tion, resist the bombardment of media messages to conform and
consume. True believers thought that the truth would simply be
unveiled to the mind of the LSD users. They would automatically
perceive the senselessness of War, the sacredness of Nature, the
brotherhood of Man. Half a century later, one notices immediately
that a deprogrammed robot will require re-programming if it is to
function at all. The CIA took the idea of deprogramming seriously
as a potential weapon in the Cold War, conducting experiments
with LSD and other drugs.
It wasn’t alone in its interest. From 1961 to 1963, Harvard psy-
chology professor Timothy Leary conducted deprogramming
experiments with prison inmates before leaving the university
to promote the life-changing insights that, according to him and
his Harvard associate Richard Alpert, could be gained from LSD.
Oregon novelist Ken Kesey first tried LSD as a volunteer subject
in a CIA study, then began to promote LSD use on the fringes of
the Stanford University community. Neither Leary nor Kesey had
university support, but both men developed personal followings
and—Leary especially—considerable news coverage. A single
droplet of LSD will send those who ingest it on a six-to-eight-hour
“trip” that can be very frightening. Kesey’s “Merry Pranksters”
wore costumes, drove around in a party-colored bus, and liked
to dose the unsuspecting with “electric Kool-Aid.” Of the various
drugs favored by the counterculture, LSD was the most likely to
produce a philosophical epiphany of some kind, but LSD trips
could traumatize the tripper, and daily use of it was infrequent.
If hallucinogens were the hard liquor of hippie life, reserved for
special occasions, then marijuana was more like hippie beer, an
enhancing accompaniment to daily activities.
Much more than LSD, therefore, marijuana became a touchstone
of countercultural belonging, a lot more fun than the hard stuff,
yet still a hallucinogen. Crusaders like Leary and Kesey, and also

WEB.indb 34 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 35

Allen Ginsberg, certainly believed that marijuana helped build the

counterculture. Ginsberg’s highly visible 1966 article in the Atlantic
Monthly argued that the effects of marijuana encouraged users to
turn away from discursive thinking (the result of social program-
ming) and toward spontaneous, creative interpretations of direct
sensory experience. By that time, the major national upsurge in
pot smoking had clearly begun. The steep increase in marijuana
use among university students, particularly, occurred following
the LSD-oriented “Human Be-In,” a 1967 San Francisco gathering
of possibly twenty thousand at which Leary and Ginsberg were
featured speakers; Kesey, already pursued by the FBI, was present
incognito.
Unquestionably, marijuana and LSD often altered the worldview
of those who used them. They were, at a minimum, unsettling ex-
periences. Leary’s famous formula, “Turn On, Tune In, and Drop
Out,” the keynote of the “Human Be-In,” was a program for per-
sonal revolution that started with drugs (“turning on”), proceeded
through acquisition of new values and self-knowledge (“tuning
in”), and culminated with a principled rejection of existing social
practices (“dropping out”), preferably in a communal living ar-
rangement. Not all who turned on really tuned in, and few, indeed,
went so far as to drop out.
There is no reason to doubt, though, that daily use of marijuana
alienated many people from prevailing social norms. To become a
“pothead” made a big difference in one’s life. To begin with, pos-
session of marijuana made you, ipso facto, a criminal. Hippies, or
anybody else who carried a rolled-up plastic sandwich bag with an
ounce or so, ten-dollars’ worth, of Mexican marijuana learned to
think of themselves as outlaws and of the police as enemies. On the
positive side, not a few people noticed that getting high enhanced
their sexual activities, especially, for men, by delaying orgasm. A
notable hippie taste for the zany and the outrageous does not seem
un-drug-related, either. The Youth International Party (YIP), which
chose its name mostly so that its members could call themselves
Yippies, and which basically thought of itself as the political arm of
hippiedom, lightheartedly made fun of itself and the U.S. military
when, during one protest, Yippies tried to levitate the Pentagon. In

WEB.indb 35 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 36 Getting High

an iconic photograph of the day, a hippie chick places a flower in

the rifle barrel of a soldier sent to quell the disturbance. The 1960s
vogue for “psychedelic” or surrealist visual art that mimics halluci-
nations also reflected an interest in altered states of consciousness.
The unsettling effect of mind-altering substances prompted some
to become spiritual seekers. Countercultural “gurus” studied Bud-
dhism, visited India, and advocated transcendental meditation.
Eastern philosophy gained a greater currency than ever before in
American life. The psychedelic experience also provoked, in many
people, an embrace of mysticism, such as the vogue for astrology.
Until the “Age of Aquarius” of the 1960s, the zodiac was for gypsy
fortune tellers and their clients.
Music gave countercultural drug use international projection.
“Sex, drugs, and rock and roll” went together. As in the Jazz Age,
the musicians producing the most popular music of the 1960s
referred to drugs in their song lyrics and used marijuana while
composing, practicing, and performing. This was true of head-
liners like Bob Dylan, the Rolling Stones, and the Beatles, and it
was true of many small fry, too. For the band called the Grateful
Dead, who emerged from the San Francisco hippie scene around
1965 and spent the next three decades touring almost nonstop,
drug use was an encouraged form of audience participation. Rock
concerts were commonly accompanied by psychedelic light shows
designed to mimic and enhance visual hallucinations. Marijuana
smoking became especially de rigueur at the open-air rock festivals
that brought together tens, or sometimes hundreds, of thousands
of young people. Feeling strength in numbers, attendees smoked
marijuana openly and shared it with those around them. The 1969
Woodstock Music and Art Festival in New York State was the larg-
est and most famous of these. Despite rampant drug use among the
half million attendees, the organizers proudly pointed out, no one
got hurt. The same could not be said, however, about the Altamont
Free Concert held near San Francisco later that year, which was
billed as Woodstock West. There, the performers’ ill-chosen “body
guards” (members of the Hell’s Angels motorcycle gang) killed
an apparently inebriated young man who brandished a pistol and
tried to climb onstage during a performance by the Rolling Stones.

WEB.indb 36 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 37

Altamont seemed to crystallize a national reaction against the

counterculture. Soon, the Sixties were over. All the in-your-face
hippie disrespect for traditional values, the brazen burning of draft
cards and flags—but not bras, although the legend continues—had
stoked the anger of those who identified with those values. The
1968 murders of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert Kennedy, grim
reminders of JFK’s traumatic 1963 assassination, had particularly
shocked the nation. Neither event was linked to the counterculture,
but both fueled a fear that things were spinning out of control.
Militant “Black Power” had overshadowed the cause of black civil
rights, with its stubbornly nonviolent, hymn-singing marches. The
last years of the 1960s were punctuated by race riots and angry,
ongoing protests against the Vietnam War, including the disrup-
tion of Chicago’s 1968 Democratic National Convention by Yip-
pies and other demonstrators. Students seized buildings at major
universities and were besieged by the police, making “campus
unrest” a grave concern in national polls. Pollution and the overall
health of the natural environment had become a concern for the
first time, too, thanks partly to countercultural “tree-hugging.” In
1969, the nation contemplated the bizarre murders committed by
the so-called Manson family, a California hippie commune run by
a psychopath who based his apocalyptic prophecies on the lyrics
of Beatles songs. In New York City, the colorfully named Stonewall
Riots launched what would become Gay Liberation. Some thought
they beheld the new Sodom and Gomorrah, others the dawn of the
promised revolution. Both were disappointed.
Marijuana’s sudden new prominence in the 1960s stemmed from
a radically changed view of it. The idea of murderous “reefer mad-
ness” had been abandoned by critics and totally inverted by expo-
nents of countercultural “peace and love.” But when reaction swept
the country, as it soon did, ideas about marijuana changed again.

DRUG WAR, CULTURE WAR

For good or ill, the Age of Aquarius did not much outlast the 1960s.
The United States gradually withdrew its soldiers from Vietnam,

WEB.indb 37 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 38 Getting High

disorder in the streets abated, LSD use dwindled. Marijuana

smoking did not decline much, if any, however. Tens of millions
of young Americans had tried marijuana, and many of them con-
tinued to smoke it throughout their lives, yet marijuana remained
illegal. After Aquarius came the War on Drugs.
The counterculture expanded its numbers but softened its fo-
cus in the 1970s as it branched out from cities like San Francisco
and New York to the rest of the nation. Images of hippies and
demonstrators had repelled many, perhaps most, U.S. viewers,
especially in rural, religious, conservative communities, but they
had inspired millions of others to imitation. In the 1970s, counter-
cultural attitudes, activities, and attire appeared in every U.S. city,
marijuana smoking notably among them.
Marijuana use continued the general pattern established in the
1960s. It was most common in people’s late teens and early twen-
ties; in that age range about 40 percent of the population had tried
it. Habitual daily users constituted only about a tenth of that num-
ber. In addition, marijuana had spread pervasively into walks of
life far from hippiedom. State anti-marijuana laws underwent lim-
ited liberalization, and the National Organization for the Reform
of Marijuana Laws (NORML) campaigned confidently. It seemed
only a matter of time until full legalization. Convenience stores
around the country stocked new brands of cigarette papers that ev-
eryone well knew were exclusively for marijuana. “Head shops,”
heavy with incense, offered all the imaginable paraphernalia of
marijuana smoking except for the substance itself. Meanwhile,
national clothing chains advertised their own awkward versions
of hippie-influenced fashions. Some remaining hippies, in search
of authenticity, shifted from psychedelic to homespun motifs and
invented “country rock.”
As the decade advanced, the national spotlight turned away
from what remained of the counterculture, which began to appear
not so apocalyptic after all. The bicentennial celebration of national
independence in 1976, with its patriotic sparkle, seemed a sign of
the changing times. Any sense of a unified movement to reinvent
society evaporated in this process of diffusion and co-optation.
Now it was counterculture à la carte, which meant, increasingly, no

WEB.indb 38 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 39

longer a brotherhood, not really a culture, at all. Gradually, even

youthful rebellion itself abandoned the counterculture, as former
hippies cut their hair, concentrated on careers, and raised children
who aspired to attend the high school prom in limousines. What-
ever mystique marijuana had once possessed as a mind-expanding
drug evaporated, too.
By the 1980s, the counterculture was “history.” True enough,
countercultural attitudes such as environmentalism and women’s
equality and, more gradually, liberty of sexual orientation had
been embraced by the country as a whole. Mainstream newspapers
now published your horoscope. But in overall style and tone, the
1980s seemed the antithesis of the 1960s, as 1980s children reacted
against the iconoclasm of their parents’ generation. Modish youth,
distressingly including one’s own children, now admired conser-
vative “success” and desired, without embarrassment, to emulate
the rich and famous. The unthinkable, from my perspective, had
happened. Conservatism had become cool. Wall Street investment
bankers and venture capitalists took on hero status in popular
culture. Cultural opposition and young rebellions continued, of
course, now with purple-haired, nihilistic “punk” stylings, but as
an undercurrent only. The urban poor became an underclass that
lost its claim on our collective conscience. National politics ex-
pressed the country’s predominantly conservative mood. Southern
whites angered by the civil rights movement moved solidly into
the Republican Party, which was also buoyed up, in the 1980s and
1990s, by fervent evangelical Christians all over the United States.
Strong anti-drug attitudes predominated in 1980s public dis-
course, which focused on public health and the social costs of drug
abuse. Even alcohol and tobacco became the object of greater re-
strictions. “Fetal alcohol syndrome” entered our everyday vocabu-
lary, replacing the idea that beer encourages lactation. Drunk driv-
ing, a practice as old as driving itself, became the object of highly
successful public safety campaigns that taught partiers to “desig-
nate” a driver. An awareness of the health risks that smoke creates
for nonsmokers dramatically reduced the acceptability of cigars
and cigarettes in bars, restaurants, and people’s houses. Protection
of children was a persuasive argument in many of these cases.

WEB.indb 39 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 40 Getting High

Meanwhile, the War on (illegal) Drugs, first “declared” by Rich-

ard Nixon in the early 1970s, intensified. In 1986, Ronald Reagan
further institutionalized it by ordering that all executive agencies
of the federal government implement drug-testing programs, and
the next year, when a train wreck in Maryland was attributed to
the engineer’s marijuana use, private companies implemented
routine drug testing nationwide. Other illicit drugs upstaged
marijuana in the public eye, though. First in prominence were the
refined alkaloids of the Andean coca plant, cocaine and “crack.”
Cocaine was 1980s chic, enormously expensive, suitable to the
high-rolling (“if you’ve got it, flaunt it”) lifestyle of a young
stockbroker. Crack, the cheaper and more potent down-market
version of the drug, however, was associated with crime-ridden
slums. Illegal manufacture of methamphetamine, “crystal meth”
or “crank,” gained traction among rural whites. None of these
drugs had any countercultural chops. They were about the way
they felt, period. The new “youth drug,” MDMA, a pharmaceu-
tical amphetamine called Ecstasy, did have a touch of utopian
mystique. A powerful euphoriant, Ecstasy gained its glamour
from close association with the impromptu all-night dance events
called “raves,” but it never gained wide currency, despite its ap-
pealing name.
How could it? High crime rates were generating colossal alarm,
and drugs and crime seemed inseparable to the general public.
Several presidents saw fit to appoint a federal “Drug Czar” with
nebulous powers. In the 1980s and 1990s, U.S. politicians found
that voters habitually rewarded tough talk about the War on
Drugs, and they delivered plenty of “tough-on-drugs” legislation.
The result was a series of mandatory minimum sentencing guide-
lines that produced more, and longer, prison terms for convicted
drug users and shifted effective sentencing power from judges
to prosecutors. The tough-on-drugs sentencing guidelines over-
loaded U.S. prisons while doing little to reduce the availability
of any kind of illegal substance. Marijuana smokers continued to
number in the millions, but they had hunkered down. Until the
campaign for what became California’s Compassionate Use Act of

WEB.indb 40 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 41

1996, the only public advocates of legalizing cannabis pretended to

be interested primarily in hemp.
Still, millions were smoking marijuana, and demand begets
supply. That supply still came mostly from abroad. In the 1990s,
the drug wars were fought increasingly outside the United
States, in Latin American countries colonized or traversed by
a burgeoning illegal drug traffic. Through the 1960s, most of
the U.S. marijuana supply crossed the border from Mexico in
cars and trucks driven by small-scale amateur smugglers. In the
1970s, the U.S. government policed the border more rigorously
and, with the collaboration of the Mexican government, had
marijuana crops south of the border sprayed aerially with a de-
foliant called paraquat. As sales of Mexican marijuana dropped,
Jamaican and Colombian entrepreneurs saw a lucrative business
opportunity and took over the traffic to an extent that, by 1980,
Colombia had become the world’s leading exporter of marijuana.
Colombian marijuana was notably superior and more costly.
Most Colombian marijuana came into the United States across
the Caribbean, by air and by sea, until U.S. military interdiction
of Caribbean routes forced the traffic back into Mexico (and later
Central America). Cocaine, far more valuable by weight, became
the preferred commodity of Colombian traffickers. The rise of
competing drug mafias (called cartels in the United States) took
a grievous toll, but that toll was remote from U.S. consumers.
What they did feel was the higher price. The steadily rising price
of marijuana inspired more domestic production, a significant
portion of it hidden away under grow lights in closets, attics, and
basements. By 2000, the formerly disparaged “homegrown” item
had been thoroughly gentrified and replaced by pampered sin se-
milla in an array of prized hybrids usually cloned from cuttings,
rather than grown from seed, to retain the special attributes of
name-brand strains.
In the new millennium, the erstwhile mind-expanding drug
of the counterculture had become a pitfall for unmotivated ado-
lescents, a comforting palliative for the gravely ill, even a legal
recreational euphoriant for upscale blue-state consumers, and yet,

WEB.indb 41 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 42 Getting High

somehow, in other states, it remained a relentlessly outlawed sub-

stance that still landed millions in jail. Where was the logic?

NEWS FLASH

Marijuana never was a devil weed that drove people violently in-
sane after three puffs. The 1936 Reefer Madness image of the drug
seemed hysterically wrong by century’s end. But the idea that pot
was an inherently mind-expanding drug had also more or less van-
ished, lingering only as quaint hippie lore. Evidently, it had been
the critique of racism, religion, sexuality and gender, consumer
capitalism, and patriotic warfare that expanded the minds of 1960s
pot smokers and led them to question The Status Quo. Without
such tea-pad philosophizing, marijuana had come to seem just an-
other feel-good recreational drug.
Meanwhile, by 2000 the U.S. counterculture and its aftermath
had totally altered marijuana’s global status. Young American
dissidents had introduced the drug to their British counterparts
almost from the start, as symbolized by Dylan’s “turning on” the
Beatles at New York’s Delmonico Hotel in 1964. Media coverage
of the counterculture, and especially its music, gave marijuana a
globally projected glamour that stimulated its use among Euro-
pean, Asian, and Latin American young people affluent enough
to emulate U.S. lifestyles. During the 1970s, once U.S. soldiers had
enthusiastically embraced the drug in Vietnam, their Cold War de-
ployment around the world played a part, too, in the transnational
dissemination of marijuana. In sum, the counterculture had made
marijuana “the world’s most used illegal drug,” something it was
far from being in 1900.
As coming chapters move outward from the United States and
backward in time, we will discover a very different and little-
known global history of marijuana, a history defined, most often,
by the social identity of the users. The poor, migrating marijuana
users of the early-twentieth-century United States will turn out
to be typical of the last few centuries. However, the idea shared
by 1920s jazz vipers, 1950s beatniks, and 1960s hippies, who as-

WEB.indb 42 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 American Century 43

sociated the drug with creative, unconventional thinking, has even

stronger precedents in global history, as we will see.
If marijuana came to the United States from Mexico, Jamaica,
and Colombia, how was it being used there? Latin America and the
Caribbean—parts of the Atlantic World created by Europeans, Af-
ricans, and Native Americans beginning around 1500—constitute
the least-understood locales on the drug’s historical itinerary.

WEB.indb 43 10/7/15 10:24 AM

WEB.indb 44 10/7/15 10:24 AM
 3

Atlantic World

T he 1910s and 1920s “outbreak” of marijuana in the United

States was, in effect, an extension of Mexico’s outbreak a few
decades earlier, and Mexican marijuana, almost exclusively, sup-
plied the U.S. market through the 1960s. Colombia became a major
supplier of marijuana to U.S. consumers in the 1970s. By that time,
U.S. soldiers and vacationers in Panama, Costa Rica, Brazil, and
Jamaica had learned that marijuana was also available in those
places. So what is the history of marijuana in Latin America?
There is no overview of the subject in any language. This gap
in the global history of marijuana is only beginning to be filled
by careful research, and a major mystery still remains. Cannabis
is clearly not native to the Americas. No form of it existed in the
Western Hemisphere before European colonization created an
interconnected “Atlantic World” around 1500. European hemp,
the Cannabis sativa that the colonizers introduced throughout their
American colonies, had never been used to get high. When mari-
juana smoking started in Mexico and, then, the United States, it
seemed totally disconnected from Old World drug traditions—so
much so, that it took years for the world to realize that New World
marijuana was a form of Old World cannabis. Where did psychoac-
tive marijuana come from?

45

WEB.indb 45 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 46 Getting High

HEMP AND RUM, STRATEGIC RESOURCES

To start to untangle this mystery, let’s take a closer look at hemp,

the cannabis that the Europeans brought with them.
Although hemp fiber has numerous applications, one of them—
hemp for the sails, rigging, and other cordage needed by sailing
ships—towers over others in global history. Beginning when early
Mediterranean seafarers established the first maritime trade routes,
right down to the rise of steam power and the decline of wind navi-
gation in the late 1800s, hemp was the preferred material for sails
and cordage in the global West. Hemp fibers are extremely long,
which means that the rope and sails made from them can possess
great tensile strength without being excessively heavy. Imagine the
need for strength when sea winds filled a billowing sail to drive a
hundred-ton vessel through heavy seas. Imagine the advantages of
light weight when sailors clambered aloft to reef sails soaked with
rain. Flax was second best, and after cotton gins began mechanical
processing of cotton in the early 1800s, making it less expensive,
cotton too went into sailcloth. Today, “canvas” is a heavy fabric
made of cotton, suitable for a ship’s sail. But the word canvas, virtu-
ally a synonym for sail, comes from the word cannabis.
Cotton sails were still a thing of the future when, in the 1500s,
various European countries—principally Portugal, Spain, France,
and England—competed with one another to establish seaborne
empires. In fact, it is not an exaggeration to say that European
monarchies wanted overseas colonies, in part, so that they could
plant hemp there. Large navies and merchant fleets meant building
and rigging thousands of ships, and it meant repeating that process
every few years as hulls got leaky and sails and rigging wore out.
Maritime construction denuded parts of the European countryside,
and it made new demands on European fiber crops, flax and hemp.
It has been calculated that to fully rig a single large European sail-
ing ship required as much as 90 tons of hemp, produced on 450
acres of land. Early modern European forests dissolved into planks
and masts, and competing countries needed a lot more hemp than
they had grown traditionally. In England, Elizabeth I mandated
that landowners with sixty acres or more all plant hemp. Early

WEB.indb 46 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 47

English colonists at Jamestown, Virginia, and New Plymouth,

Massachusetts, were asked to plant hemp, too. To encourage pro-
duction, a number of English colonies in North America allowed
partial payment of taxes in hemp fiber. Both the Portuguese and
the Spanish eventually established government hemp plantations
in their American colonies.
Hemp was not just a strategic resource, either. It was also a
routine part of life in the interconnected societies that composed
the Atlantic World. Any farmer on either shore of the Atlantic
Ocean, after 1500, might well grow some hemp for domestic use.
Fine fabrics, called linens, could be made of hemp as well as flax.
The “homespun” clothing of the North American frontier was nor-
mally spun (and woven and stitched) at home using hemp fiber.
Harvesting and processing hemp fiber was labor-intensive and
never mechanized. To derive the necessary raw material from the
harvested plant, one first let it lie in the field to “rot,” for a time,
so that the softer tissue would decompose, then stacked it to dry,
then thrashed it manually against a wooden frame to extract the
billowy fibers of extraordinary length. One could then make a rope
or a cinch, or a pair of pants, and if any fiber were left over, apply
it to one’s taxes or barter it for something else. Because hemp fiber
was valuable, not perishable, easy to store and transport, and al-
ways in high demand, store owners were often happy to take it in
trade. In the Atlantic World, people made rope in a long structure
called a “rope walk,” where workers paced hundreds of feet back
and forth on a covered walkway, twisting hemp fibers. Kentucky,
on the remote trans-Appalachian frontier, had hundreds of them.
European hopes of a colonial hemp bonanza were disappointed,
however. America never became a major supplier of hemp for
Europe’s strategic maritime needs. The lands around the Baltic Sea,
Russia especially, remained the best source of high-quality blond
hemp fiber, produced by methods much more complex than field
rotting. New England, with its significant shipping industry, had
to import hemp fiber from overseas. In the early 1800s, Kentucky
became the one part of the New World to see spontaneous devel-
opment of commercial hemp production. But field-rotted Kentucky
hemp was of such poor quality that even the U.S. Navy preferred

WEB.indb 47 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 48 Getting High

to import the more expensive Russian product. Eventually, the

main market for Kentucky hemp fiber, once it had been woven
into rough cloth, was on slave-driving plantations that employed
it to wrap bales of cotton for shipment to market in Europe. The
Kentucky workers who sowed, harvested, and processed the hemp
crop were themselves slaves, and hemp declined in importance as
a U.S. crop after the abolition of slavery, mostly because the age of
sail was ending.
In sum, marijuana’s homely sibling, hemp, played a crucial
supporting role in one of global history’s defining events: Euro-
pean seaborne exploration and colonization of America, Africa,
and parts of Asia between 1500 and 1900. But that role had noth-
ing whatsoever to do with psychoactive properties. Europeans
seem never to have tried to smoke their cannabis crop in this
time period. People in Africa definitely did. Therefore, it makes
sense to ask whether any slaves in the U.S. South—perhaps in,
say, Kentucky—smoked cannabis. If they had been familiar with
cannabis at home, after all, why not sample the domestic variety
in Virginia or Maryland? For whatever reason, despite claims to
the contrary, smoking hemp was never a general practice among
blacks, whites, or anybody else in the United States before 1900.
On the other hand, the European colonizers of the New World
were definitely hard-drinking people, which brings us to a sec-
ond great strategic resource of the Atlantic World in the 1600s,
1700s, and 1800s: ethanol.
Ethanol is natural alcohol, the product of fermentation, a meta-
bolic process by which yeast breaks down sugar, the fructose in
grapes, for example. But ethanol-producing bacteria stop produc-
ing ethanol when the concentration gets beyond 12 to 13 percent,
limiting the potency of fermented beverages such as beer and
wine. To make stronger liquor requires distillation, technologi-
cally a more involved process. Distillation was known to the an-
cient Greeks and, then, during the medieval period, to the Arabs,
who preserved ancient learning that was lost in medieval Europe.
But distillation was merely a toy of experimental scientists until
around 1500, when Germans began to distill wine to make brandy,
a word meaning “burnt wine.” This new fire water was so much

WEB.indb 48 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 49

more potent than fermented drinks that contemporaries were not

sure they relied on the same active ingredient.
Europe’s capitalist economic growth in the centuries after 1500
turned distillation into a drug revolution. For centuries, Europeans
had drunk as much beer and wine as they could produce, which
seemed never to be enough. As subsistence-oriented medieval
Europe became market-oriented early modern Europe, traditional
scarcities gave way to capitalist surpluses. Surplus grain was
preserved and put to use through fermentation. (Grain must be
malted, to make it sweet, before fermenting, though.) Surplus wine
was preserved by distilling it. The Germans who started making
brandy did so partly because they had surplus wine on hand. The
colonization of the Americas brought new forms of abundance to
Europeans, most notably, for our story, the creation of sugarcane
plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean. The basic raw material for
ethanol had always been in rather short supply in Europe. In the
1600s, though, colonial sugar arrived in Europe’s Atlantic ports by
the crate, along with a distilled liquor made from it, rum. In the
1700s, English landowners found a market for their surplus grain
with distillers eager to make gin. Grain-based distillation further
fueled trade and the growth of market capitalism and, thus, Euro-
pean seaborne expansion.
One of the peculiarities of European seaborne expansion was the
large role of small trading nations. Tiny Portugal pioneered sail
navigation of the African coast, initiated the Atlantic slave trade,
and established a seaborne merchant empire that stretched from
Brazil to the Indian Ocean, China, Japan, and Indonesia. Through
the 1500s, Portuguese ships maintained something close to a trad-
ing monopoly in Africa and Asia. Then other small, maritime coun-
tries of Europe took their turns at strutting on a global stage. The
Dutch, particularly, made distillation a strategic asset in their brief
bid for world domination. Their drug of choice at home was beer,
but beer (being difficult to preserve and transport) was not yet a
practical commodity for long-distance trade, and Holland was all
about trade. As a historic center of the European wine trade, it was
a good place to distill wine into brandy. The canny Dutch therefore
realized multiple advantages in commercializing hard liquor.

WEB.indb 49 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 50 Getting High

Simply because they were more concentrated, brandy, rum, gin,

and other distilled spirits got customers drunk faster and kept
them drunk longer. That gave them five to ten times the value, by
weight and bulk, of fermented drinks—a crucial consideration in
long-distance trade. Furthermore, liquor could be stored almost
indefinitely and it improved with age, likewise facilitating its
commercialization. As a result, the amount of alcohol consumed
by Europeans rose alarmingly. London, especially, experienced a
“gin craze” from 1700 to 1750, involving a scale and intensity of
alcoholism and related social pathologies never before witnessed
in modern history.
The English, too, made of distilled spirits a strategic trading re-
source. English colonials distilled rum from abundant Caribbean
sugar and whiskey from even-more-abundant American corn.
Rum-making in prosperous Boston, Providence, and Philadelphia
was part of the “triangular” slave trade, a historical pattern that
brings the entire Atlantic World into view more or less as follows.
Yankee traders took cloth and guns to trade for slaves on the Af-
rican coast, carried the slaves to Caribbean islands covered with
sugarcane plantations, traded the slaves for sugar, and sailed home
to make rum and count their profits. English settlers also traded
distilled spirits to Native Americans. The aboriginal natives of
the United States and Canada were a global rarity, people whose
traditional cultures did not include any significant use of ethanol,
which, in its highly concentrated form, hit them more or less like a
speeding truck. The Europeans, well aware of the drug’s devastat-
ing impact on the Indians, sometimes supplied it with that very
end in mind.
Hemp and rum, then, played notable parts in creating the Atlan-
tic World of 1500 to1900. Meanwhile, where was marijuana?

MEXICO, AND A MYSTERY

One place it was, we can say with certainty, was Mexico—acquir-

ing the name that migrating workers later introduced to the United
States. The origin of the word marijuana is clearly Mexican. It may

WEB.indb 50 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 51

derive from the Mexican tendency to use the name María as a ver-
bal disguise for hallucinogenic substances that were condemned
by the Catholic Church. Hallucinogenic peyote, for example,
was called Santa Rosa María; another mild hallucinogen, María
Santísima. Marijuana wasn’t named for a soldier’s sweetheart,
María Juana, as the story goes. Such overtly specific origin stories
are almost never true. But María Juana certainly was another verbal
disguise for the drug. Moreover, soldiers’ sweethearts do figure
prominently in the story of marijuana, and so does the disap-
proval of the Catholic Church. Much remains unknown, however.
A dearth of information is, alas, a constant in the global history of
cannabis before 1900.
The historical contrast with evidence on alcohol (and tobacco)
is quite astounding. Spanish archives groan under the weight of
records relating to alcohol and tobacco in the New World. Unlike
the Indians of what is now the United States and Canada, the Az-
tecs (and their related subject peoples) made and drank ethanol.
By Aztec law, the common people drank only (and then, heavily)
on ritual occasions. Pulque, fermented from the juice of the ma-
guey cactus, was their wine, and the common people of Mexico
continued to drink pulque for centuries. The Spanish rulers of
colonial Mexico lamented the large consumption of pulque and
taxed every ounce of it, very lucratively indeed—the reason for
all those archived official records. Something similar could be said
about tobacco, its pre-Columbian origins, its ritual significance, its
many users in the colonial period, its lucrative tax revenues. Ciga-
rettes (wrapped in paper, as opposed to cigars, wrapped in tobacco
leaves) were seemingly invented in Mexico and mass-produced
there, for the first time anywhere, in the 1700s.
In comparison, the total of what is known about the history of
marijuana in Mexico before 1850 would probably fit (as raw data)
on a single sheet of paper, but it will take a few pages more to
explain what it means. First, in the 1530s, one of the Spaniards led
by Cortés, upon being rewarded for his efforts with a gift of forced
indigenous labor, set his forced laborers to planting Spanish hemp
in the highlands around Mexico City. In 1587, a Spaniard of At-
lixco, Puebla, also in the Central Highlands, requested the use of

WEB.indb 51 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 52 Getting High

six Indians to plant hemp. It is not known whether the request was
granted. About a century later, a different family, also from At-
lixco, began producing hemp commercially, on a modest scale, and
continued until 1761. In the 1770s, the Spanish Crown launched a
concerted campaign to foment hemp production in Mexico, with
indifferent success. One of the biggest problems was lack of seeds,
which, according to colonial authorities, could not be bought
in Mexico. And that is the entire known history of marijuana in
Mexico up to that point: a few early crops of hemp, alcohol and
tobacco aplenty, but no marijuana at all, strictly speaking—that is,
not a word about any psychoactive cannabis.
No word, that is, were it not for a studious priest of the Central
Highlands, José Antonio Alzate y Ramírez, a relative of the great
Mexican poet and intellectual Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz. One day in
the 1760s, Alzate y Ramírez had learned that indigenous people of
his locality not far from Mexico City were consuming preparations
that they called (in the native language) pipiltzintzintlis, concoctions
that gave them access, somehow, to the spirit world. Fearing pagan
idolatry, the priest acquired a bit of the mysterious pipiltzintzintlis
and found to his amazement that, as far as he could see, it was sim-
ply the leaves and seeds of European cannabis. He planted a seed
and what sprouted, Cannabis sativa, confirmed his hypothesis. It
seems that, although commercial hemp production hardly existed
in colonial Mexico, people, especially indigenous people, had con-
tinued to cultivate it, but, clearly, to use it for something other than
fiber. Alzate y Ramírez informed those trying to grow cordage and
sails for the Spanish Empire where they could find hemp seeds in
Mexico. Go to the marketplace and ask for pipiltzintzintlis. Look
for the indigenous herbolarias.
Herbolarias, herb dealers, sold bundles of dried this and that,
leaves, seeds, roots, and flowers of all descriptions. A little chamo-
mile tea, some flax seed, or a dose of psilocybin. Herbolarias were
generally indigenous women, and they possessed indigenous, as
well as Spanish, botanical and medicinal lore. They also knew
about hallucinogens, we would say today, because Mexico has the
richest hallucinogenic flora in the world, teonanácatl (mushrooms
from which psilocybin is refined) and peyote (cactus buds from

WEB.indb 52 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 53

which mescaline is refined) being merely the best known. Religious

specialists among the indigenous people had used psychoactive
substances for many centuries before the Spanish came, which
is one reason why the Catholic Church condemned their use as
idolatrous. Pipiltzintzintlis, peyote, and teonanácatl represented
the competition, so to speak—a religious experience outside the
Church. Therefore, Mexico’s spiritual users of cannabis kept a low
profile, but the evidence of their activities was not hard to find if
one knew where to look. Seeds for pipiltzintzintlis? Why didn’t
you say so? By the bushel!
What had happened? Without more detailed evidence, we have
only inference to guide us. Apparently, during the two and a half
centuries between the 1530s and the 1780s, when commercial
hemp production was fizzling totally and only a handful of docu-
ments confirm its existence in Mexico, there nonetheless had been
continuous subsistence cultivation of Cannabis sativa, a few plants
here and there in rural kitchen gardens, just as in Spain or New
England. It seems a safe inference. Then, let us recall that Mexico’s
majority rural population of these years was strongly indigenous,
not Spanish landlords, for the most part, but Spanish-speaking
Indians, ruled over by Spanish viceroys and bishops, but heirs to
a millenarian tradition of selective cultivation. Mexico is one of
the world’s true hot spots of plant domestication. Corn, a Mexican
creation, and, like cannabis, a wind-pollinated crop that requires
constant, ongoing selection by traditional farmers, is a prime ex-
ample. Domestic corn, far more than Old World grains like wheat
and barley, constitutes a triumph of early bio-engineering, entirely
transformed from its wild progenitors. Let us recall, next, that these
botanical wizards also had a special interest in, and long experi-
ence with, hallucinogenic flora that gave privileged access to the
spirit world. Anthropologists believe that the New World has so
many more known hallucinogens than the Old, roughly ten times
as many, not because it was providentially endowed with more,
but because New World people were better at identifying them.
They gained this ability, hypothetically, by migrating through so
many distinct climate zones to populate the Americas. Perhaps, in
view of all this, we should not be at all surprised if ten generations

WEB.indb 53 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 54 Getting High

of indigenous Mexican botanists, aided by the blistering tropical

sun, were able to discover and cultivate the psychoactive potential
in European hemp.
Such, apparently, was the origin of the marijuana that eventually
traveled to the United States around 1900, but we can’t be certain.
Perhaps the Spanish hempseeds that first arrived in Mexico had
already been crossed, somehow, with Cannabis indica from Mo-
rocco. The Moors, Muslims gave their name to Morocco, had lived
in Spain for centuries, and definitely grew psychoactive cannabis.
Wind-born cannabis pollen can fly across the Strait of Gibraltar
from Morocco to Spain. No Moors came to the New World, though.
The indigenous people would still have had to discover the plant’s
psychoactive powers for themselves. Perhaps an African slave,
accompanying the Spanish invasion of the New World, somehow
brought a few seeds of a potent psychoactive strain with him. That
seems more likely to have occurred in Brazil, where African slaves
were more numerous. In any case, indigenous Mexicans, with their
pipiltzintzintlis, clearly had a special role in recognizing and culti-
vating the plant that became marijuana.
Oddly, Alzate y Ramírez’s discovery that pipiltzintzintlis ex-
actly resembled hemp was soon forgotten, and references to pipil-
tzintzintlis disappeared after a few years, anyway. The low pro-
file, again. Not until the 1840s does one find any further evidence
that marijuana existed in Mexico. And then, there it is. In 1846, the
recently founded Mexican Academy of Pharmacy published a na-
tional pharmacopeia that registered the existence of two separate
Mexican strains of cannabis: sativa, listed for its “emulsive seed”
(for hempseed oil, the classic, nonpsychoactive European medical
use) and, in a separate entry, “Rosa María,” which it also called
“native hemp,” used for its “narcotic leaves.” Another name for
Rosa María, according to the book, was mariguana, the first ap-
pearance of any form of that word in print. In the next decade, a
pharmacist of the University of Guadalajara mentioned that Rosa
María was smoked in cigarettes, the first evidence of that practice.
(Pipiltzintzintlis seem to have been eaten.) Further references fol-
lowed in the 1860s and 1870s, as the word marihuana gradually
became familiar to readers of Mexican newspapers.

WEB.indb 54 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 55

Marijuana was very far from being a universal of Mexican life,

however. Little known in the cities before 1850, it grew widely in
the countryside, and the smokers of it were poor country people,
and not just the indigenous people whose grandparents had spo-
ken of, and perhaps used, pipiltzintzintlis. In the 1840s and 1850s,
those who spoke of and used Rosa María, which is to say mari-
juana, included many who had left an indigenous identity behind.
Marijuana use was emerging now among mestizos, people in the
not-Indian, not-European category of cultural/racial in-between-
ness by which Mexicans increasingly defined their national sense
of self. Undoubtedly, though not illegal, smoking Rosa María was
considered un-Catholic. The oh-so-innocent-sounding name was
itself a reminder of the need to blow some smoke, so to speak,
when mentioning the drug. The young rural men who gathered
to pass a marijuana cigarette from hand to hand were not doing
anything religious, not divining the future or gaining access to the
spirit world. They were using marijuana more as a cheap substitute
(or enhancement) for pulque, with the difference that it did not in-
terfere with physical labor. And yet, the idea that marijuana was a
“devil weed” (as the Inquisition had considered pipiltzintzintlis to
be), the idea that it was a bit pagan, that it produced madness and
unholy violence—had not completely vanished, either.
Beginning in the 1860s, national upheaval and war, then a pe-
riod of rapid economic growth, stirred things up in rural Mexico,
moving soldiers and workers around the country. First there was
the French invasion that created an imperial throne for Emperor
Maximilian (under French control). Then the great hero of the
Mexican resistance against the French, Porfirio Díaz, inaugurated
a thirty-year period of dictatorial presidency that put out a wel-
come mat for international investment and enterprise. Railroad-
building opened the countryside and gave it access to the Atlantic
economy. That was a boon to landowners, but it tended to displace
the landless peasantry. Many became hacienda “peons,” which
was about as nice as it sounds. Railroads offered a ride elsewhere.
On the way, migrants passed through growing towns. They were
young men with zero years of schooling, jostled loose from tiny,
traditional villages, now far from home, willing to try their hands

WEB.indb 55 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 56 Getting High

at anything. They landed in the army, in labor camps, in rough

neighborhoods where homeless drifters go to spend the night. Of-
ten, they got in trouble for fighting. It was a commonplace belief in
Mexico that marihuana (like pulque and tequila) made them do it.
Prisons and military barracks were the two places most associ-
ated with marijuana smoking in Mexico by 1900. We should be
clear about what that means. Marijuana had not turned these con-
scripts into soldiers, obviously, and, consumption of it not being
generally illegal, neither had it turned them into prisoners. Rather,
prisons and barracks created the ideal conditions for marijuana to
substitute for pulque. Mexican prisons concentrated on keeping
inmates inside, not on supervising their activities there. Barracks,
too, were somewhat prisonlike. Compared with alcoholic drinks,
marijuana was much more easily smuggled and consumed. Prisons
and barracks were also places of tough masculine society where
the “devil weed” reputation could even be a plus. So “prisoner”
and “soldier” make sense as far and away the most frequently
mentioned identities of early marijuana users in the Mexican press.
Other descriptors often applied in print were lower class, degenerate,
thieves, Indians, social dregs, police (recruited from the social dregs),
and revolutionaries—along with various references to women, such
as herbolarias, prostitutes, and soldaderas. The denizens of Mexico
City’s underworld were said to loiter at cheap cafés smoking gri-
fos and drinking coffee laced with cane liquor. Finally, there were
also some middle-class dandies who dabbled in marijuana. Such a
figure was drawn by the famous late-nineteenth-century caricatur-
ist José Guadalupe Posada, who called his creation “Chepito Mari-
huano.” A group of young dandies was said to meet at night in the
shadowy cloisters of an abandoned convent, decorated with sym-
bols of occult spiritualism, to smoke marijuana and read poetry.
Some women smoked marijuana, but press reports provide good
evidence that men outnumbered them twenty to one. Women ap-
pear in the press reports much more often as suppliers than users.
Herbolarias were not supposed to sell marijuana, but they re-
mained the chief source of it for the urban population. Soldaderas,
who traveled with soldiers to cook for them and take care of them
in various ways, could be described as prostitutes or as soldiers’

WEB.indb 56 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 57

sweethearts, overlapping categories at the time. Getting marijuana

from the herbolaria and sneaking it to her man in a jail or a pris-
onlike barracks was a routine chore for such a woman, who may
never have smoked it herself.
Mexican press accounts from the late 1800s and the turn of the
twentieth century present marijuana as a substance that converts
smokers into homicidal maniacs after exactly three puffs. Here,
in article after article, we find the origins of the “reefer madness”
image later publicized in the United States by Anslinger’s Federal
Bureau of Narcotics. It is an open question how much this “social
script” influenced the behavior of the young men who were smok-
ing marijuana in Mexico more than a hundred years ago. Did they
feel themselves possessed by a devilish influence that made (or
allowed) them to run amok? Press descriptions of fights under the
influence of marijuana don’t differ much, in fact, from descriptions
of similar fights under the influence of drink. Mentions of alcohol in
such accounts were twenty to a hundred times more common. And
yet, the Mexican press had absolutely nothing good to say about
marijuana, whereas alcohol was a different, more complex story.
Alcohol was the active ingredient of lower-class pulque, but also
of champagne and cognac, symbols of European chic in a country
whose better-off citizens yearned for Europe. Only a smattering of
bohemian middle-class Mexicans dabbled with marijuana, but all
social classes drank. Immigrant families of German brewers were
beginning to produce excellent beer in Mexico. Consequently,
grisly murders, described with lurid detail in the yellow press
(newspapers sometimes called, in Spanish, prensa roja for the color
of blood, their prime subject matter), could not define the entire so-
cial meaning of alcohol, only its lowlife pathology, for the Mexican
reading public of 1900. But they could, and did, define the entire
meaning of marijuana. And marijuana’s indigenous image only
made matters more embarrassing for the Mexican middle class, by
reminding them of a Mexico that they preferred to forget.
All this gives us a much better picture of the backstory, so to
speak, of marijuana smoking in the United States. The U.S.-built
railroads that were stirring up the Mexican countryside also hired
many Mexican workers and carried them north to the U.S. border.

WEB.indb 57 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 58 Getting High

U.S. mining and ranching interests in northern Mexico wanted

more strong young men with zero years of schooling (jostled loose
from tiny villages, willing to try their hands at anything), and
soon U.S. labor contractors were signing them up to repair track
or pick peaches north of the border. Nobody but the young men
knew they smoked marijuana, until they got into fights . . . and
the rest is history, or, at least, a story already told in chapter 2.
Now we can understand why Pancho Villa’s soldiers sang about
marijuana, why migrating workers kept the stuff under wraps, and
why respectable Mexican Americans had not the slightest interest
in defending it. Finally, we can see where Harry Anslinger got the
idea of promoting the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 by showing con-
gressmen pictures of mangled corpses.
If indigenous Mexicans managed to detect and cultivate the psy-
choactive powers that Cannabis sativa had lacked in Europe, did the
same thing happen elsewhere in the Americas?

COLOMBIA AND JAMAICA

The short answer is probably not. Most Latin American countries

had no discernable tradition of marijuana use at all before the
phenomenon was introduced from the outside in the twentieth
century. Colombia is fairly typical in that regard.
Like most other Latin American countries, Colombia has only a
very brief history of use—less, in fact, than the United States. If the
United States learned to smoke marijuana from Mexico, a crude
but accurate description, Colombia learned to smoke it from the
United States. Reports from 1607, 1610, 1632, and 1789 indicate
that repeated attempts to stimulate hemp production for sails and
cordage had conspicuously failed in Colombia, just as happened
in most of Spain’s American territories, seemingly because of the
deeply rooted native fiber crops, such as fique and henequen. The
most successful hemp plantations were in Chile, and there is no
record of any psychoactive use surrounding them.
Whatever hemp grew in Colombia, nobody smoked it, either.
Then, in the mid-1920s, people began to bring marijuana to Co-

WEB.indb 58 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 59

lombia from abroad. The first mention of the drug in Colombian

newspapers crops up only in the mid-1920s, on the country’s Ca-
ribbean coast, around its busiest port, Barranquilla. It was appar-
ently brought by sailors and by men who came to work on banana
plantations belonging to one of the first U.S. multinationals, the
United Fruit Company. You could buy it around Barranquilla at
stands selling food, beer, and guarapo, the local fermented drink.
The earliest producing areas in Colombia were in the vicinity of
the United Fruit banana plantations, which probably indicates
that the workers were smoking marijuana—except that it wasn’t
exactly marijuana, that is, the somewhat mysterious psychoactive
strain that had appeared in Mexico. It was probably ganja, Cannabis
indica from Jamaica. Ordinary Colombians called it by an African
word, marimba.
From the 1890s to the 1920s, black workers of the English-speak-
ing Caribbean (Jamaica, Trinidad, Guyana) circulated widely and
often smoked marijuana, or ganja, or marimba, by whatever name.
They had gotten it from East Indian laborers brought to the Carib-
bean by the British. The Caribbean was trade rich and labor-hun-
gry during those years, a vortex of circulating people and goods
linked to the Atlantic economy. The workers who dug the Panama
Canal, that enormously labor-intensive early-twentieth-century
project, came from the black Caribbean. A mobile black Caribbean
workforce manned the banana plantations of Central America and
Colombia. Banana plantations were connected to the “modern”
world by the fast steam transportation necessary to move their
fragile, perishable product to market in the United States. Bus-
tling Barranquilla was a more modern, cosmopolitan city, in some
ways, than the Colombian capital, Bogotá. In Colombia, therefore,
marimba embodied “globalizing forces” in the Atlantic economy,
the increasing movement of capital, commodities, and labor. As in
Mexico, it was a poor man’s drug (but not, in Colombia, a “devil
weed”).
Marimba smoking increased slightly in the 1930s and 1940s,
but in general, domestic consumption has been quite secondary,
in Colombia, to the illegal traffic, which only began in the 1960s,
responding to the demand of the U.S. market. The tradition that

WEB.indb 59 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 60 Getting High

launched Colombia into its “marimba bonanza” of the 1970s was

not a tradition of use or cultivation. It was a tradition of smug-
gling, which people of the Guajira Peninsula of Colombia’s Carib-
bean coast have carried on for hundreds of years. U.S. hippies and
Colombian youth back from a brush with the U.S. counterculture
ventured into the Sierra Nevada mountains behind the city of
Santa Marta (not so far from the old United Fruit banana planta-
tions), identified the quality of the product, tested the market, and
began to smuggle it in personal luggage. Businessmen who had
been smuggling coffee (to avoid paying export tax) saw a much
more profitable opportunity, planted marimba, and began to send
boatloads to the United States.
From that limited trade, in coming decades, sprang Colombia’s
drug cartels, their ostentatious style of spending and violence, their
widening presence in national life. Beginning on the Caribbean
coast, where the smugglers themselves were sometimes Guajiro
Indians, the bankrollers of the operation were often businessmen
from the coffee-producing central cordillera of Colombia, particu-
larly Medellín. This part of Colombia has a reputation for entrepre-
neurial aggressiveness and Catholic piety, two qualities certainly
on display in the drug mafia that came to be called the Medellín
cartel. Colombia’s decades-long experience with rural-guerrillas-
cum-bandits had already begun in the 1950s and 1960s, and in
the central cordillera the government often did not rule, creating
myriad opportunities for illegal activities in the cordillera’s steep
and labyrinthine flanks.
Marimba cultivation on the Caribbean coast was upstaged in
the 1980s by cocaine smuggling, centered in Medellín. At first the
cocaine came from further south, from Bolivia and Peru, but soon
the Medellín cartel was processing coca leaves (the raw material)
in Colombia. The fabulously powerful crime boss Pablo Escobar
became the most famous Colombian in the world. He and his
associates purchased political influence and laundered obscene
profits, driving urban real estate prices skyward. Then Colombia’s
rural guerrillas, who in the 1980s and 1990s controlled much of
the countryside, began to finance themselves partly by “taxing”
the traffic and occasionally kidnapping the narcos for ransom. The

WEB.indb 60 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 61

narcos resisted “taxation” by creating paramilitary forces to protect

themselves against guerrilla extortion, but the paramilitaries, too,
got involved in the traffic. More drug money, more gasoline on
the flames. As bullets ripped through rural communities, country
people caught in the crossfire fled to the major cities. When they
were miffed, Colombian mafia dons like Escobar assassinated
judges and detonated bombs on the streets of major cities. Not
mafia ruthlessness, but rather, explosive profitability, was what
made the illegal traffic unstoppable. Colombia’s ruling class hated
it, but, even more, they wanted a piece of it. At one point, they let
Escobar design his own boutique prison just for himself and run
his syndicate by cell phone. Like the rural guerrillas and the right-
wing paramilitaries, the drug mafia became a fact of Colombian
life, something that middle-class people simply worked around in
planning their daily business and pleasure.
They also learned to consume marimba and various forms of
cocaine. Marimba first became common among people of the Ca-
ribbean coast, then followed the inland expansion of the traffic.
Those involved in the traffic had an abundance of marimba on
hand. Middle-class kids got the message by listening to rock music.
But most young Colombians were not involved in the traffic and
not middle-class. They were too busy (dreaming of a car and a de-
cent job) to “turn on, tune in, and drop out.” Overall, Colombians
continued to prefer beer and the cane liquor called aguardiente to
marijuana. The annual prevalence of marijuana use in Colombia
never approached the U.S. rate. It is the U.S. market, not internal
consumption, that has defined the Colombian experience with can-
nabis.
The Jamaican experience has been different. Some rural com-
munities of Jamaica have strong, pre–twentieth-century patterns of
psychoactive cannabis use. The Jamaican word ganja is from Hindi,
and there is little mystery about how the plant got to Jamaica.
Both the word and the plant were apparently brought to Jamaica
by indentured laborers from India during the nineteenth century.
These men from South Asia were intended to substitute for the
freed slaves of Jamaica, who, after abolition in the 1830s, refused
to stay on coastal sugar plantations. Casting about for alternative

WEB.indb 61 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 62 Getting High

labor, the British decided to import manpower under long-term

contract from their vast South Asian colony. The indentured labor-
ers, mostly Hindi speakers, earned less than the freed slaves, but
they kept coming in a slow, steady stream until the 1910s. Among
the things that they brought with them, in addition to the ganja
itself and distinctive clothing and golden bangles, was a cylindri-
cal ganja-smoking pipe called a chillum, the custom of consuming
cannabis in a chilled beverage, and the propensity to think of it in
religious terms.
Meanwhile, the freed slaves who preferred not to do plantation
labor at any price migrated to the Jamaican highlands where they
could grow their own food, and, eventually, their own ganja, too.
They were following in the footsteps of escaped slaves who had
made free lives for themselves there in earlier times. Maroons, they
were called. By 1913, ganja was evidently well-enough established
in such communities for the British colonial government to ban it.
A few more years and black Jamaicans had become the primary
consuming population in the country. What we know about their
use of ganja comes mostly from the work of anthropologists who
studied rural Jamaica in the 1970s. These anthropologists found
ganja integrated into the working and social lives of rural men,
most of whom smoked it, and many of whom grew their own.
They used it for diversion and relaxation, but also for endurance
in physical labor, and in a religious manner.
While that last inclination is plainly Indian, the Jamaican religion
didn’t come with the ganja. Rather, it came from the Bible, which the
slaves and escaped slaves and freed slaves interpreted creatively.
The Christian story of deliverance and redemption spoke to them,
and they embraced it and added to it. One of the additions was
ganja, which they believed opened their minds for spiritual com-
munion. They found biblical quotations to legitimate their vision (as
in Psalm 104, “He causeth the grass for the cattle, and herb for the
service of man”), and came to envision themselves as heirs of the
ancient Children of Israel in their Babylonian captivity. Their un-
usual clarity, in that regard, came from the earlier activities of Mar-
cus Garvey, a Jamaican who claimed maroon descent and dreamed
of mobilizing millions of people scattered throughout the African

WEB.indb 62 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 63

diaspora in the Americas. During the 1920s, Garvey had created

quite a stir with his “Pan-Africanist” activities in several parts of the
Atlantic world, his founding of a Universal Negro Improvement As-
sociation and an African Communities League, and his creation of
the Black Star Shipping Line, as well as his exhortations to self-help
and cooperation among people of African descent around the world.
Garvey predicted that a great leader would arise in Africa to head
the movement. Some saw the 1930 crowning of Ethiopia’s emperor
Haile Selassie as the rise of that leader. Wishful thinking. But faith
does not require evidence, and even though the emperor of Ethiopia
(Ras Tafari, he was called, before ascending his throne as Haile Se-
lassie) never did anything to redeem the modern Children of Israel
who yearned for deliverance and redemption and smoked ganja in
their search for it, he did furnish them a name: Rastafarians. And he
did visit Jamaica, in 1966, so the devotion of the island’s Rastafarians
had at least not passed unnoticed by him.
Among those inspired by the emperor’s visit was a young musi-
cian, Bob Marley, who brought Rastafarianism to the attention of
the world. Marley was an exponent of the musical style known as
reggae, a supremely diasporic mixture of influences, and his inter-
national concert tours of the 1970s made reggae an enduring part
of the world music scene. Marley’s long hair (his “dreadlocks”),
which Rastafarians are not supposed to cut, and his unapologetic
ganja smoking put him right in stride with other popular musi-
cians of the period, such as the Rolling Stones and the Grateful
Dead. Like them, he was arrested repeatedly.
Marley was not a Jamaican expression of the U.S. counterculture,
but rather something more homegrown, an authentically popular
Jamaican voice, who represented a style of cannabis use that owed
nothing to Haight-Ashbury. What was new for Jamaica, in 1968,
was not long hair and cannabis but the surging market for Jamai-
can ganja in Woodstock Nation. Whereas little evidence of Jamai-
can ganja in the United States occurs before that point, given its
notable potency and the proximity of Jamaica to the United States,
an illegal trade grew rapidly in the 1970s and 1980s. As in Colom-
bia, the drug traffic eventually represented a sizeable portion of
Jamaica’s gross national product.

WEB.indb 63 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 64 Getting High

In the 1970s, Colombia and Jamaica had begun to export indica

strains of marijuana that were much stronger than the Mexican va-
riety and that retailed in the United States for three times as much.
The Colombian and Jamaican experiences converge most notably
in the disastrous impact of that traffic on national life. But the
contrasts between these two cases are more meaningful than the
similarities. Jamaica’s marijuana culture represents a direct connec-
tion with India, something unique in the hemisphere. Aside from
those already discussed, only one other Latin American country
had marijuana smokers before the United States did: Brazil.

BRAZIL AND THE AFRICAN CONNECTION

Brazil’s tradition remains relatively unstudied, which seems a bit

odd. Today, marijuana is exuberantly present among urban youth,
rich and poor, a fixture, particularly, of the improvised neighbor-
hoods called favelas, and so it’s been for decades. Before the 1960s,
however, things were quite different.
Brazilians may have been the first to smoke marijuana in the
New World, and the story, once again, seems to involve a migra-
tion of laborers, in this case, the involuntary migration of enslaved
Africans. In Jamaica, Colombia, and the United States, as we have
seen, people of African descent figured significantly among smok-
ers of cannabis at some point in the twentieth century. In none of
those cases, however, do the slaves appear to have brought it with
them from Africa. Brazilian maconha, on the other hand, seems to
have a direct African origin. For example, Brazilians call it by a
variety of African names, and they once smoked it in water pipes
of a distinctively African design.
In describing the creation of the Atlantic World in the 1500s, we
mentioned the huge part played by sugar. Let’s now consider the
slave labor that cultivated, harvested, and milled the sugarcane.
The two great centers of sugar production for Atlantic trade were
Brazil and the Caribbean, equally characterized by their reliance on
enslaved African labor. Brazil was the first great sugar producer of
the Americas and, as such, became the greatest single destination

WEB.indb 64 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 65

A Brazilian water pipe of African design.

of the slave trade. Rather than being truly a “single destination,”

though, colonial Brazil was a string of Portuguese settlements that
hardly communicated with one another. They had one big thing in
common, their dependency on slave labor, beginning in the 1500s.
Slavery saturated Brazil, no corner of society was free of it, and it
lasted for three hundred years. Because Brazil juts far east into the
South Atlantic, it is much nearer to Africa than is the United States.
That made slaves less costly, so more were imported, and slavery
became ubiquitous in Brazilian life. In Brazil, even freed slaves
sometimes owned slaves. It was an exceptional but well-known
phenomenon. So old João has bought a slave of his own, has he?
Eyebrows go up. He must be doing well! Brazilian slavery was not
totally abolished until 1888.
There is a clear consensus, among the few who have considered
the matter, that slaves brought maconha to Brazil. It makes sense.
Brazil’s close connection to Africa allowed for the transatlantic

WEB.indb 65 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 66 Getting High

transfer of African foods, clothing styles, and religious practices—

importations that Brazilians celebrate as aspects of the nation’s cul-
tural heritage. Furthermore, when a few Brazilians began to study
maconha in the early twentieth century, they found it most often
among people of African descent. In sum, the idea of maconha’s
deep roots in the long experience of slavery is persuasive and prob-
ably correct. The caveat, for this global history, is a troubling lack
of direct evidence.
Like Mexican marijuana, Brazilian maconha is practically invis-
ible in the historical record until the late nineteenth century, partly
because Brazilians were busy consuming other drugs instead.
Abundant sugar made Brazilian cane liquor (called cachaça) also
abundant. Mixed with further sugar and lime juice, it became the
national drink, practically replacing milder, fermented drinks un-
til the twentieth century. As in Mexico and the United States, the
indigenous drug of choice, tobacco, flourished in colonial Brazil,
too. Cachaça and tobacco were both useful in the slave trade, as
well as for domestic consumption. These drugs were widely (and
intensively) ingested by Portuguese settlers, their descendants, and
pretty much everybody else in Brazil, too. Maconha, on the other
hand, was used primarily by plantation slaves and other poor rural
people, who wrote nothing about it, being the least literate group
in society. Plantation owners (another group that wrote little) ap-
pear to have tolerated it. Anthropologist Gilberto Freyre, the influ-
ential nationalist interpreter of Brazil’s African heritage, wrote in
the 1930s that earlier plantation owners had allowed slaves to culti-
vate maconha between the rows of sugarcane. Freyre knew a great
deal about Brazilian slavery, both from his research in historical
sources and from his plantation-family background, but he gave
no evidence for his assertion. In fact, aside from a handful of anec-
dotes, the chief evidence for Brazilian maconha’s African origins is
a series of central African names that Brazilians used for it in the
late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, maconha being only
the best known. In the 1940s and before, diamba was more common,
and another term was fumo de Angola, which could be translated as
“Angolan tobacco.” However, none of those names occur in writ-
ing before the twentieth century. And then there’s the “old say-

WEB.indb 66 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 67

ing” of the slave masters that “smoking maconha makes the blacks
lazy,” which was not recorded before the twentieth century, either.
So, stepping back from the pervasive but vague oral tradition,
what proof exists of maconha’s presence in Brazil before the twen-
tieth century? The first contemporary trace of maconha in Brazil
(potentially, anyway) occurs in a legal document dated 1747. The
“crime” in question isn’t quite clear. Inquisitors were interrogating
a young man accused of illicit sexual activities (with other young
men), when he admitted that they had gotten “loaded” by drinking
and smoking before their frolic. He didn’t say what they had been
smoking, and the inquisitors didn’t ask. They were more focused
on the sex. Interestingly, this young man was a musician from Por-
tugal, although his buddies were partly of African descent. A sec-
ond contemporary trace (presuming that it is accurate) comes only
in 1830, when the city council of Rio de Janeiro supposedly banned
the sale of pito de pango, a name for maconha on the East African
coast. The document is widely mentioned but is not preserved in
any archive. Then, in 1867, an English traveler described slaves
frittering away their Sundays smoking what he termed “hashish,”
which he had also encountered in India and on the African coast.
There are a few other random anecdotes, a weak form of historical
evidence.
This is alarmingly little documentation for a supposedly wide-
spread activity over a period of centuries. True enough, the shreds
of evidence that we do have—legal prohibitions, judicial inquiries,
and travelers’ accounts—are commonly the historical glimpses that
one gets of cultural activities scorned by the Brazilian ruling class.
In conjunction with oral traditions, they confirm that maconha was
present in Brazil by the mid-1800s. But they give no reliable indi-
cation of how, or from where, maconha came to Brazil. After all,
African words might just as naturally have been applied by Afri-
cans to a familiar-looking plant (Portuguese hemp) that Europeans
had definitely planted in Brazil. In fact, the notable lack of written
evidence, despite decades of slavery studies, shows that maconha
simply cannot have been very common among slaves, in Brazil or
anywhere else in the New World. Police, travelers, and plantation
owners would have left more written evidence about a common

WEB.indb 67 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 68 Getting High

practice. Instead, maconha emerges in Brazilian history, much as

marijuana emerges in Mexican history, from rustic anonymity to
urban notoriety, only toward the beginning of the twentieth cen-
tury.
When Brazilian public health officials finally began to study ma-
conha in the mid-twentieth century, they identified it as a regional
phenomenon, an aspect of northern Brazil, relatively unknown in
the south. Their explanation was climate, the more intense sun of
the equatorial north. Interestingly, the areas of intense plantation
agriculture, Brazil’s demographic black belts, created by sugar and
coffee cultivation, mostly along the coast, were not the rural roots
identified by twentieth-century officials diagnosing the maconha
problem. Rather, they indicated the backlands, the fringe areas of
original Portuguese settlement in the arid northern interior, the
sorts of places still inhabited by catechized Indians, places where
the descendants of African slaves were a minority. The idea is sug-
gestive.
Public health officials of the mid-twentieth century associated
maconha with people of indigenous descent, as well as blacks,
listing fumo de caboclo, which could be translated as “Indian to-
bacco,” as one of its slang appellatives, along with fumo de Angola.
Might Brazil’s indigenous peoples have discerned and developed
European hemp’s latent psychoactive potential, as seems to have
occurred in Mexico? Anthropologists have identified maconha use
among some Amazonian Indians. Although Brazil does not dupli-
cate Mexico’s profusion of hallucinogenic flora, the native Ama-
zonian drug ayahuasca (an ingenious combination of two different
plants) shows an obvious alertness to the potential of such flora.
Successful selective cultivation of European hemp to encourage
its psychoactive properties would have taken time, as in Mexico,
and it would have occurred away from prying Portuguese eyes,
in the indigenous backlands. It would probably have had some
kind of spiritual application, similar to whatever it was people did
with pipiltzintzintlis in Mexico. It would have been disseminated
slowly, by contact and migration, and spread first from Indians
to blacks and mestizo peasants, those least able to afford tobacco
and cachaça. This is, in fact, the pattern we can dimly see in the

WEB.indb 68 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 69

evidence. A native Brazilian “invention” of maconha, similar to

the native Mexican “invention” of marijuana, just might have oc-
curred. For now, though, the brought-from-Africa scenario seems
more probable for Brazil.
Fortunately, the history of maconha becomes clearer in the mid-
twentieth century. It looks much like the early history of mari-
juana. Evidence shows that the smokers of maconha lived mostly
in the north, were mostly black, most often male, invariably poor
and downtrodden. This was a period of rural-to-urban migration,
and people who smoked maconha were often new to the city. In-
evitably, they were marginal, too. Street children were especially
known for maconha. As in Mexico, barracks and prisons (also men-
tal hospitals and brothels) were common places to find smokers.
So were ports, right at the waterfront; fishermen and other boat-
men sometimes kept a water pipe in their boats. The São Francisco
River, the great transportation artery of the Brazilian backlands,
was the central axis of maconha production and distribution. The
river-port town of Propiá in the state of Sergipe had a particular
reputation for the quality of its product, which was distributed by
boat up and down the Atlantic coast to the waterfronts of larger
cities, like Bahia and Recife. Smoking maconha, by the twentieth
century, was done mostly in cigarettes rather than water pipes,
often in lively groups called “assemblies” that engaged in competi-
tive, rhyming wordplay. Local color fiction writers depicted such
assemblies using invented nonsense rhymes of African-sounding
words. A boy who grew up in Propiá recalled the rambunctious,
entertaining late-afternoon assemblies in the marketplace there.
In the 1930s, northeastern intellectuals became interested in ma-
conha as an expression of regional folk culture. At the same time,
however, Brazil created its own Federal Bureau of Narcotics, which
took an Anslinger-like stand against the maconha menace. During
the 1940s, U.S. soldiers stationed in Bahia did not find maconha dif-
ficult to acquire, and Bahian public health officials became worried
about the soldiers excessively stimulating the market. Still, as late
as the 1950s, smoking maconha remained relatively rare in Brazil,
especially in the major urban areas of the south, the principal cen-
ters of Brazilian national life. The real stimulation occurred in the

WEB.indb 69 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 70 Getting High

1960s and afterward, among Brazilian youth who were inspired

by the international counterculture. By the mid-1980s, smoking
maconha had become a sign of modernity. The U.S. market was too
far away to beckon strongly, but Brazil’s internal market was big
enough to generate a lucrative trade, especially in urban giants like
Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. Poor neighborhoods passed under
the control of gangs of twenty-something drug merchants wearing
flip-flops and brandishing assault weapons.
The persuasiveness of the brought-from-Africa hypothesis for
Brazilian maconha lies not in the evidence, which is sketchy, but in
its overall historical logic. Around 1500, when the diaspora of Afri-
can slaves began, Africa south of the Congo River was the only part
of the Atlantic World where people used cannabis psychoactively.

AFRICA, SOUTH OF THE CONGO

Available evidence of early cannabis drugs in Africa is even scarcer

than what we have for the Americas. But it is consistent and un-
ambiguous regarding the area south of the Congo River. Moreover,
cannabis drugs definitely circulated in the slave trade.
There exists at least one African travel account of a cannabis seed
in the possession of a captive awaiting exportation. There exists at
least one other in which a slave trader introduces the custom to
an African associate. Like most people in the Americas, however,
Africans showed a consistent and unambiguous preference for
ethanol as a recreational drug.
Virtually all the societies of sub-Saharan Africa made and con-
sumed fermented drinks. The most distinctive, also the most po-
tent, was wine made from the sap of the raphia palm, the African
analogue of Mexican pulque. It was men’s work to climb the tree
and tap the sweet, milky fluid that fermented very quickly in the
hot climate. Palm wine had to be drunk immediately, most often
in a single day. Raphia palms were widespread but limited in
numbers. The alternative drink was beer made from native grains,
normally a kind of millet or sorghum. Beer making, which in-
volved sprouting the grain to malt it, then baking it, then ferment-

WEB.indb 70 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 71

ing it for several days, was much more laborious and protracted.
Consequently, brewing was usually women’s work, viewed as an
offshoot of cooking, which beer making has most often been in tra-
ditional societies around the world. This sort of beer had a much
lower alcohol content than palm wine, as low as 2 percent, but it
was quite nutritious and, like most historical beer, had the consis-
tency of gruel. Palm wine and millet beer were drunk to celebrate
social gatherings, to close commercial contracts, to bond with new
relations at a wedding party, to facilitate tears at a funeral, and to
communicate with departed spirits. Africans showed their esteem
for ethanol by reserving it mostly for their “big men,” the senior
leaders of villages, clans, tribes, and kingdoms. Still, though widely
produced and highly valued, ethanol was less abundant in Africa
than elsewhere in the Atlantic World.
The magic of altered consciousness was a scarce resource in
Africa, often a perquisite of the powerful. It belonged to a more
general category of scarce resource: food. Most of Africa’s econo-
mies were subsistence economies, geared to produce sufficiency,
with little surplus. Senior males drank deeply themselves and also
distributed the prized substance to their friends and followers.
Younger men, and women of any age, were less likely to consume
alcohol in Africa. Few other generalizations can be made about
psychoactive drugs in these extremely diverse, small-scale societ-
ies, except to say that, around 1500, cannabis, too, seems to have
been present in many of them.
Cannabis was much newer and more sparsely and unevenly rep-
resented in sub-Saharan African life than was ethanol, however.
Once again, only a tiny smattering of written references exists, in
contrast to a much better documented history of drink. European
travelers make scattered mention of cannabis, using especially the
words dagga and riamba, mostly in the 1800s. A few broad outlines
emerge from what they say. Above all, they indicate that Africans
pioneered smoking cannabis. Archeological evidence now shows
the existence of pipes predating the introduction of tobacco to
Africa. There are a great variety of water-pipe designs, including
a number made from gourds, as would later be common in Brazil.
Several travelers found people smoking to prepare for war, and

WEB.indb 71 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 72 Getting High

another found them doing it to make peace. It was used for physi-
cal work and for rest and recreation. The famous explorer Living-
stone wrote that “all the tribes of the interior” used the pernicious
and stupefying weed.
Nothing clearly differentiates what we know of cannabis in
precolonial Africa from patterns of alcohol use there. People ap-
parently smoked in the absence of alcohol or to augment its effect.
Several illustrations from Angola in the early 1800s show men
smoking water pipes while drinking. In one of those illustrations,
the men are drinking, probably cachaça that was brought from Bra-
zil to trade for slaves. Once again, the preferred euphoriant was al-
cohol, but the great advantage of cannabis was the ease with which
it can be grown, stored, and transported, attributes making it less
costly. It is indicative, surely, that the hunter-gathering Khoisan
peoples, the Bushmen of Africa’s southern deserts—whose mate-
rial culture is totally minimalist—were early adopters of dagga, as
they called it, applying a name formerly used for another hallu-
cinogen, datura. Notably, they were not using cannabis to replace
alcohol, but something much stronger.
Cannabis had been south of the Congo River for only a few hun-
dred years when Europeans arrived. Linguistic studies indicate
that it was introduced on Africa’s east coast, along the shores of
the Indian Ocean, sometime between the years 1000 and 1300, and
then diffused gradually westward. (See map.) Bhang, the tradi-
tional name for cannabis on Africa’s east coast, comes from Hindi.
From 1000 to 1500, Indian Ocean traders plied the east coast of
Africa, linking it closely to India, the core area of global cannabis
culture. Most of these traders were Muslims, and Islam became
the religion of Africa’s east coast. The natives of that coast became
cultural intermediaries whose Swahili language, combining Bantu
syntax with Arabic vocabulary, served as a lingua franca. Swahili
intermediaries apparently learned to use bhang from the traders
and then disseminated it inland. The westward diffusion of bhang
can be traced in the changing names applied to the drug. By the
time it reached the shores of the Atlantic in Angola and the Congo,
it was called riamba, and eventually diamba, names that turned up
later in Brazil.

WEB.indb 72 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 73

Cannabis, south of the Congo River.

Curiously, the east-to-west dissemination of psychoactive can-

nabis seems to have stopped at the Congo River. While the slave
trade probably introduced it at a few points on the West African
coast, West African societies overall lack traditional names for
psychoactive cannabis and have tended to adopt international
ones, such as “weed.” This picture substantiates the notion of
east-to-west diffusion, obviously, but it constitutes a mystery, as
well, given the existence of trans-Saharan communications and the
importance of hashish in Mediterranean Africa after about 1000,
as will be discussed later. For now, we will focus on the southern
region where cannabis clearly was present by the 1600s.
On Africa’s Swahili coast, bhang had the prestige of an exotic
trade good, associated with fine cities like Kilwa, the impressive
port admired by the world traveler Ibn Battuta in the 1300s. Bhang
probably began its westward journey on caravans connecting the
coast to gold-producing areas inland, the early states of Great
Zimbabwe and Mutapa. Moving south under the name dagga,
the drug’s use was extended across the current territory of South
Africa some time before 1652, when the Dutch established Cape

WEB.indb 73 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 74 Getting High

Town as a halfway provisioning station for Dutch ships on the way

to Asia. The Khoisan people’s taste for dagga led the Dutch to offer
it to their laborers as a fringe benefit. The nearby Zulus, renowned
warriors, figure among the people known to have used marijuana
for war, but that was not until the 1800s.
As bhang moved west from the Swahili coast across central Af-
rica, adopting the modified name riamba, it entered a kind of war
zone. A substantial Portuguese presence created the continent’s
most invasive slave trade on the Atlantic coast south of the Congo
River. The Portuguese introduced goods, including both guns and
Brazilian cachaça, which were carried by caravan to slave fairs deep
in the interior, fueling conflict. Armed conflict always disrupts food
production, and ethanol is food. Cutting down raphia palms was a
common act of war in Africa. A reduction of the food supply encour-
aged people to substitute riamba for beer. In addition, the slave trad-
ers and their associates spread various drugs around, sometimes
including riamba, no doubt. As for alcohol and tobacco, they were
basic to the trade. Luanda, the Portuguese import-export depot on
the Atlantic coast, was full of cachaça and taverns in the 1600s and
1700s, so the big men with slaves to trade along the caravan routes
were well supplied with spirits. Their followers, too, got at least a
symbolic taste of cachaça. Overall, however, the toll taken by slaving
probably reduced the supply of traditional fermented intoxicants
among the less prosperous and encouraged the adoption of riamba.
The Beni Riamba, a short-lived “riamba brotherhood” that
formed in central Africa in the 1850s (when the slave trade had
finally ended) suggests further possibilities. According to a Eu-
ropean traveler who happened to record this phenomenon, it oc-
curred among a people known as the Bashilange, who had the sort
of small-scale social organization more common in African history
than large kingdoms. The numerous Bashilange clans and villages
had traditionally feuded among themselves until a young leader
arose proposing a new, more peaceful order against the resistance
of change-averse elders. He did so, it would appear, by mobilizing
an “age set,” a distinctive facet of African social organization that
brings together generations across clan, tribal, or ethnic dividing
lines. The vehicle of peace was to be riamba.

WEB.indb 74 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Atlantic World 75

To bring about their brotherhood, the young men smoked to-

gether in the evenings and employed riamba to settle disputes and
for ritual functions. The Beni Riamba stopped inter-village feuding,
making the Bashilange more industrious and prosperous. All this
is according to the single traveler’s account, which unfortunately
is the only one we have. Still, one would not suspect a European
traveler of exaggerating the benefits of “riamba brotherhood.” The
innovation remained localized, though, provoking a traditionalist
opposition from the elders, and the Beni Riamba disappeared for-
ever in the 1870s.
Cannabis use has certainly increased in Africa over the interven-
ing century-plus. For one thing, it is now quite present in West
Africa, especially Nigeria, the continent’s most populous country.
Rural users in South Africa long preferred the traditional water
pipe, but urban people smoke cigarettes. This is probably true of
twenty-first-century African users in general. Aside from a major
sociological study of 1970s South Africa, few other primary sources
of information exist. Data collected by the UN in the first decade of
the twenty-first century remain sketchy, with many countries un-
represented. Regarding the number of consumers, there is a yawn-
ing gap between high estimates and low ones. High estimates put
annual prevalence of marijuana use in Africa around U.S. levels—
which is to say, among the highest in the world—10 percent of the
population, whereas low estimates are less than half that. Zambia,
a central African country with strong traditions of historical use,
stands out as a hot spot in the UN data, along with Nigeria. Even
more than the history of marijuana in Latin America, though, the
history of marijuana in Africa largely remains to be written.

A global history of marijuana is limited at every turn, it seems, by

a dearth of reliable evidence. What sound generalizations can be
made about cannabis in the Atlantic World? First, we have seen
its crucial importance as a European fiber crop, linked above all to
maritime applications. European colonists introduced hemp practi-
cally everywhere they went in the Americas. Second, we have seen
marijuana constantly overshadowed by alcohol as a recreational
euphoriant. Latin American traditions of cannabis drugs are far

WEB.indb 75 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 76 Getting High

more limited than many people imagine. Only Mexico, Jamaica,

and Brazil had significant local traditions before the international
influence of the U.S. counterculture made marijuana stylish in the
late 1960s. While widespread in central and southern Africa before
European colonization, psychoactive cannabis was nonetheless
a relatively recent arrival there, too. Despite the striking account
of the Beni Riamba brotherhood, most historical African societies
seem to have used psychoactive cannabis much as they used alco-
hol. That is, much as Europeans used alcohol, although in smaller
quantities. Until the 1960s, marijuana was mostly a poor man’s
recreational drug, not only in the United States but in the entire
Atlantic World.
There are hints of something more than recreation, too: indig-
enous Mexican fortune tellers eating pipiltzintzintlis; Rastafarians
finding ganja in the Bible; and, above all, those Beni Riamba broth-
ers renouncing ancient feuds over peace pipes to found their brief
utopia. To see the spiritual dimension of marijuana’s global history
more sharply delineated, we’ll turn to the medieval Muslim world,
which had a counterculture of its own.

WEB.indb 76 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 4

Medieval Hashish

B efore the advent of marijuana, the European and U.S. experi-

ence with psychoactive cannabis came primarily from hash-
ish. Europe’s drug-dabbling avant-garde writers experimented
with hashish in the mid-1800s. Harry Anslinger’s 1937 portrait
of the marijuana-smoker-as-homicidal-maniac explained, by way
of supporting evidence, that the word assassin derives etymo-
logically from hashish. For many centuries, in Muslim societies
stretching from Spain and Morocco to Egypt, Arabia, Syria, Iraq,
Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and on across India to (eventually)
Malaysia and Indonesia—hashish was a social fixture, though
never a custom of the majority. The years 1100–1400, when hash-
ish became established in the Muslim world, are a major chapter
in our story.
First, a definition of the main term. In contemporary English, the
word hashish refers to the pungent resin concentrated from large
numbers of female cannabis flowers. During the last few centuries,
certain mountainous regions of Morocco, Lebanon, Afghanistan,
Pakistan, and Nepal have specialized in the production of hashish,
going about it in rather different ways. In Lebanon, for example,
dried cannabis flowers are rubbed through progressively finer
mesh to produce a reddish powder that is then pressed into bricks.

77

WEB.indb 77 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 78 Getting High

In Nepal, for a second example, harvesters in the fields squeeze res-

inous flowers between their hands, accumulating layers of sticky,
dark-colored hashish on their palms before scraping it off and
rolling it into balls. A tiny lump of this sort of hashish produces a
strong psychoactive effect. Medieval hashish, in contrast, was not
the concentrated resin of today. Medieval hashish was described
as “leafy” and must have been something like today’s sin semilla.
Second, nobody in the Muslim world was smoking anything in
the years 1100–1400. Despite the independent invention of pipe-
smoking in Africa, smoking among Muslims (and as a global phe-
nomenon) started with tobacco, and tobacco did not enter the Mus-
lim world before the 1500s. When it did, hookahs (and other water
pipes) became a common way to consume hashish, often mixed
with tobacco. Before that, however, hashish was always eaten, and
that requires a bit of explanation. If it is to function psychoactively
in the digestive tract, marijuana must be cooked to activate its can-
nabinoids before eating. That is because much of the psychoactive
THC exists in the raw plant as a slightly different, nonpsychoactive
molecule (called THCA). Cooking above 200° F converts the THCA
into THC, which happens automatically in smoking.
There were many ways to eat medieval hashish. Hashish con-
fections involving spices, nuts, and honey were common ways
to consume the plant. Another common approach was to gently
roast the hashish, then roll it into little balls that could be swal-
lowed easily. Most of the time, though, cooking with cannabis
meant extracting the cannabinoids from the leaves and flowers.
Cannabinoids are fat-soluble rather than water-soluble. To dis-
solve and extract them, you simmer the leaves and flowers in
butter until it turns green, then discard the vegetable matter and
cook with the infused butter.
Now that we’re clear on what we are talking about, let’s turn
to the evidence. There are substantial written sources concerning
hashish in the Arabic-speaking center of the medieval Muslim
world. Interpreting them will require attention to the social and,
especially, the legal and religious contexts. The crucial starting
place is the status of intoxicating drink for observant Muslims.

WEB.indb 78 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 79

WINE VERSUS HASHISH

The Qur’an—which Muslims regard as the direct, revealed word of

God and the starting point of lawgiving—makes a clear, although
somewhat complex, judgment on wine. Wine is a symbol of heav-
enly bounty, and the rivers of paradise run with it. But on earth
wine is an impediment to Godly living. Drunkenness prevents a
person from scrupulous fulfillment of earthly obligations, such
as frequent prayer. In addition to the direct world of God in the
Qur’an, which religious men began to commit to memory verba-
tim during the life of Muhammad (ca. 570–632), there accumulated
a voluminous body of sacred wisdom, called hadith. Hadiths are
traditional accounts of the Prophet’s life and words, meticulously
vetted by legal and religious scholars. Hadiths serve as a second
tier of Muslim scripture, less authoritative and more homely than
the Qur’an, and (unlike the Qur’an) evolving over time. A vast
number of hadiths and commentaries on hadiths enjoin observant
Muslims not to partake of alcoholic beverages. The prohibitions of
wine laid down in the Qur’an and elaborated by hadith over many
centuries have had a powerful cumulative impact on Islamic soci-
eties, whose limited consumption of alcohol has stood in notable
contrast to the tippling customs of Christian Europe.
The Old Testament is repeatedly critical of drunkenness, but it
accepts wine as an ordinary part of life and an instrument of reli-
gious ritual. In the New Testament, Jesus instructs his disciples to
reenact the Last Supper using bread and wine. This reenactment,
the Eucharist, became central to both Roman and Greek variants
of Christianity. Because Christians needed a constant supply of
wine for ritual purposes, medieval monastic orders planted their
own vineyards, spreading viticulture, and a taste for the grape,
throughout Europe. In addition, northern Europeans drank quite
a lot of beer, or more precisely, beer and ale, the latter fermented
somewhat differently. England’s history of ale drinking is particu-
larly well documented. It indicates that during the Middle Ages,
the common people—men, women, and children—consumed ale
daily, sometimes several times a day, including with breakfast.

WEB.indb 79 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 80 Getting High

This ale contained little ethanol, and it was thick, with bits of grain
floating in it. In essence, ale was a way to eat barley. Fermenta-
tion served partly as a preservative. In sum, alcohol beverages
constituted a basic part of the European diet, and a few extra cups
more were normally available if people desired to engage in a little
drunken carousing.
The Muslim repression of fermented drinks, in contrast, opened
a tentative space for hashish as the-intoxicant-not-prohibited-by-
the-Qur’an. Hashish was often seen as an alternative to wine. It
was called “the green one” (as opposed to “the red one”) in fre-
quent poems comparing the two. However, the difference in moral
status was only relative. Hashish had not yet appeared in Arabia
during the life of the Prophet, so the Qur’an naturally has nothing
to say about it. Its subsequent appearance in Damascus, Baghdad,
and Cairo, at the center of the medieval Muslim world, brought a
legal reaction against hashish. Eventually, the ongoing elaboration
of hadiths included new, negative references to hashish. And, as
has been explained, hadiths are quasi-scriptural in character. Some
of the new criticisms were attributed directly to Muhammad, giv-
ing them more authority. For example, in one hadith, the Prophet
says, “beware the green one, for it is the greatest wine,” in another,
“beware the wine of the Persians, for it will make you forget the
confession of faith”—“the wine of the Persians,” according to that
hadith, being hashish. Overall, however, the prohibition against
“the red one” was crystal clear, and the religious disapproval of
“the green one,” more debatable.
This mild-but-marked disapproval of hashish in the Sunni tradi-
tion is one key to our story. Though hardly abundant, documenta-
tion of hashish in the medieval Muslim world is better than any-
thing we have on premodern Latin America or Africa. Moreover,
much of that evidence is legal. A score of juridical treatises, in ad-
dition to hadith, have survived to illuminate the story of hashish,
casting the drug in a steadily negative light. Lacking Qur’anic au-
thority, legal scholars made alternative arguments against hashish.
They reasoned that intoxication itself being the reason wine was
banned, intoxicating hashish should be banned by analogy. And

WEB.indb 80 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 81

they further justified prohibition by enumerating harms caused by

the drug, the full catalog of which is harrowing indeed:

It destroys the mind, cuts short the reproductive capacity, produces

elephantiasis, passes on leprosy . . . makes the mouth smell foul,
dries up the semen, causes the eyebrows to fall out . . . causes a
shortage of breath, creates strong illusions, diminishes the powers of
the soul, reduces modesty, makes the complexion yellow, blackens
the teeth, riddles the liver with holes, [and] inflames the stomach . . .

This example can stand for many.

Legal sources have nothing good to say about hashish. Users
(normally male) were condemned as effeminate (often erotically
attracted to boys) and neglectful of their religious obligations. They
were out of touch with reality, debased, shiftless, and, therefore,
poor. Often, hashish itself had been their ruination. Medieval Mus-
lim jurists regarded the green one as more addictive, even, than the
red one. In fact, though less lurid, the image of the hashish eater
most often encountered in medieval Arabic legal sources partly re-
sembles the figure of the modern crack or meth addict, reduced to
misery because of his own improvidence, spending all his money
on drugs, his very existence an affront to the idea of a well-ordered
society. And the search for a well-ordered society is at the very
heart of majority Sunni Islam. Disapproving legal sources were
emphasized by the distinguished Yale scholar of Arabic literature
Franz Rosenthal in his 1971 book, The Herb, which remains by far
the best study of hashish in the medieval Muslim world.
Fortunately, legal sources are not the only ones to have survived.
Medieval Muslim societies revered the written word and put it to
various uses. An alternative and lesser known source of documen-
tary evidence is a “bohemian” tradition of Arabic poetry, dedicated
to both wine and hashish. The Herb contains careful translations of
ten such poems, including several that compare wine to hashish
and one in praise of combining them. The poems have a frankly
celebratory mood that is a world away from the legal condemna-
tions. The poetic hashish is “the wine of the poor.” It is a wonder-
ful “secret.” Hashish, unlike wine grapes, has never been trodden

WEB.indb 81 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 82 Getting High

under foot and crushed through people’s toes. Nor has the green
one ever been used to perform hocus-pocus at Christian altars. It
is something fun and new and stylish and less sinful than wine.
Anti-hashish poems, on the other hand, scoff at “the green one”
as “grass” fit for beasts, while wine, on the other hand, “covers
the lowly person with respectability,” because of its expense. Like
wine, hashish represents unearned ecstasy. Such poetry, which
would have been recited at festive gatherings, provides a useful
counterpoint to the dour legal treatises. A final source comprises a
few medieval folk tales recounted in One Thousand and One Nights
and elsewhere, which offer a comical view, as we will observe in
a moment.
Less sinful than wine, but also less prestigious, hashish was le-
gally condemned by the Sunni tradition, yet secretly celebrated by
various sorts of fringe elements and dissenters. Before we get to
the dissenters, though, let’s see how the green one first appeared
in Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, the center of the Muslim world, around
1100, and then discuss the use that might be called simply “recre-
ational.”

HASHISH IN MUSLIM SOCIETY

Hashish appeared in the center of the Muslim world around the

year 1100, when that world was under threat. The political and
religious unity of Islam, represented by the rule of a caliph in Bagh-
dad, was dwindling away to nothing amid storms of political and
religious dissent. Destructive invaders, the Crusaders of Western
Europe, had entered the Muslim world from the west, and other
equally alien invaders were on their way from the east. Under-
standably, in this context, many medieval Arabic speakers saw
hashish as a harbinger of troubled times.
The first sign of hashish to appear (to those of us peering back
nine hundred years) is the word itself, which occurs in Arabic-
language documents beginning with one dated 1123 on the
European calendar. More precisely, the 1123 document contains
the first known appearance of the word hashish referring to a can-

WEB.indb 82 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 83

nabis drug. The word cannabis (qinnab in Arabic) had long existed
in the eastern Mediterranean, with no connection to intoxicating
drugs, and the same could be said for hemp (banj in Arabic). As for
hashish, it was a familiar Arabic word that, around 1123, acquired a
new meaning. Before that time, hashish had referred vaguely to ani-
mal fodder (grass), medicinal plants (herbs), or unwanted growth
in the garden (weeds). Get it? The new cannabis drug was being
called “grass” or “herb” or “weed.” Hashish was medieval Arabic
slang, in other words, that eventually became the standard Arabic
term for the drug.
Alias “the green one,” hashish had many other aliases. A long
list of them includes about seventy. Many are associated with
particular regions or cities. For example, the people of Baghdad
(supposedly) called hashish “the daughter of the bag,” a play on
the common expression “daughter of the cask” (wine). Certain
professions and social types supposedly had their own code terms
for hashish. Many of these terms seem fanciful inventions, but oth-
ers had evident currency. Porters (supposedly) called hashish “the
one that lightens the load”; philosophers, “the morsel of thought”;
songstresses, “branches of bliss”—and so on, through gypsies,
leather workers, cooks, water carriers, builders, homosexuals, as-
trologers, grave diggers, corpse washers, dealers in herbs and po-
tions, falconers, merchants, and pimps, ending with Satan and his
cohorts, who called hashish “the huntress.” The “devil’s own list of
hashish synonyms,” as it is called, critiques the wide, but normally
covert, use of the drug.
Hashish was collected wild, grown in private gardens and public
parks, and cultivated commercially for sale. At certain times, in
certain places, it was tolerated and taxed, but the authorities oc-
casionally cracked down on growers. There is news of crops being
burned in Cairo in 1253, for example, then again in 1324. In con-
trast to taverns, which could exist because non-Muslims were often
free to drink wine, one found no public establishments for eating
hashish. Instead, there were particular streets, or houses, or shady
spots where hashish eaters gathered to carouse, and perhaps recite
verses in praise of the green one. Several anecdotes mention hash-
ish eaters in the public baths that were a common feature of urban

WEB.indb 83 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 84 Getting High

life in medieval Muslim cities. Use of intoxicants was hidden in

such settings, and that went double for the center of public life, the
mosque. When it came to secret recreational drug use, the green
“daughter of the bag” was proverbially more portable and more
easily concealed than the red “daughter of the cask.”
The lower cost of hashish, when compared to wine, was also
proverbial. The popularity of hashish among the urban lower
classes clearly rested on its inexpensiveness. When wealthy Mus-
lims allowed themselves to be naughty, they preferred the red one.
Surely no caliph ever tasted hashish, said a poet, but many drank
wine, as was well known. The average hashish eater was more like
the watchman at a Cairo warehouse who supposedly spent all his
wages on his habit. The religious dissidents who ate hashish, such
as the followers of Haydar (to be discussed later in this chapter)
did so as part of a life of poverty. The list of occupations provided
by “the devil’s own list of hashish synonyms” is definitely heavy
on manual labor and less reputable avocations. Without a quantita-
tive assessment of the drug’s social distribution, which is plainly
impossible, we can nonetheless observe clearly that Sunni jurists,
whose writings have provided most of our evidence, considered
hashish eaters to be the dregs of society.
Poor students were among the usual suspects. Medieval Muslim
students spent many years achieving mastery over authoritative
legal and religious texts. Once that mastery was achieved, more-
over, it wasn’t necessarily lucrative. One anecdote tells of a scholar
lecturing under the influence of hashish when his turban fell off,
revealing the concealed drug. Another story tells of a student who
arrives unexpectedly at his teacher’s home to find him deliriously
dancing and reciting poetry about flowers.
Sunni jurists often accused hashish eaters of sexual deviance,
especially homosexuality. They called hashish “the seducer’s
friend,” a weapon deployed against innocent and unsuspecting
targets. Popular depictions such as those in One Thousand and One
Nights emphasize the erotic fantasies and promiscuity of hash-
ish eaters. One Thousand and One Nights is a treasury of medieval
folk tales from around the Muslim world, combined in a framing
narrative wherein, to avoid her execution (perpetually threatened

WEB.indb 84 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 85

for the next day, for reasons that don’t matter here) a woman,
Scheherazade, must entertain the prince with her storytelling. She
chooses the most compelling material—bawdy, lurid, and action-
packed—and she cuts off each story halfway . . . to be continued,
for a thousand nights. A number of the stories mention hashish. In
“The Tale of the Hashish Eater,” a man eats hashish, goes to the
public bath, falls asleep there, and has erotic fantasies that cause
him to awaken with his hand on his erection amid the laughter of
onlookers. In a second story, a hashish eater exiting the public bath
passes an attractive young man entering, does an about-face, and
follows him back in. (The green one made him do it.) In a third
hashish-in-the-public-bath story (this one not from One Thousand
and One Nights) the hashish-eating patron walks out of the bath
wearing a towel, enters a second bath unaware of what he’s doing,
and, at the end of the afternoon, can’t find his clothes. A crowd
leads him naked through the street back to the first bath, shouting
“hurrah for hashish.”
Overall, the common denominator of such popular stories involv-
ing hashish eaters is foolishness. Hashish makes people lose touch
with reality, and the result is silly and undignified. So, did you
hear the one about the hashish eater who went out for grapes and
barley? He gave the grapes to his donkey and the barley to his wife!
There are several stories about hashish eaters mistaking the glow of
moonlight for water on the ground. One tells of a poet who, having
recited his poetry at a gathering of hashish eaters, goes out into the
moonlit street. The moonlight shines on the ground, and thinking
that it has inexplicably flooded, the poet hikes up his robe to keep it
dry. Passersby witness his indignity and make fun of him. Another
hashish eater, mistaking the moonlight for water, tries to dive into
it. Hashish eaters? They could mistake a camel for a gnat!
The effects of hashish per se, it seems fair to say, did not seem
very threatening to the disapproving majority. Medieval Arabic
sources never suggest that hashish eating led to criminal behavior,
much less violence (not even theft to pay for the drug), despite its
being considered strongly habit-forming. The distaste directed at
hashish seems to derive more from associated patterns of devi-
ance, such as religious dissidence and homosexuality (whether real

WEB.indb 85 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 86 Getting High

or imagined), and from prejudice against non–Arabic-speaking

peoples who lived somewhat (not far enough!) to the east.
Arabic sources associated hashish especially with these non-
Arabic speakers. According to our list of hashish synonyms, nick-
names, and code words, Turks called the green one esrar, mean-
ing “secrets,” and they made frequent use of it. Persians called it
shadanaj, which could be translated as “royal grain,” or, perhaps,
“queen of insanity,” and they made frequent use of it, too. The
Sunni legal treatises written to counteract the popularity of hash-
ish in the 1200s and 1300s agree that hashish came to the Muslim
world from the east. That meant, in the first place, from Persia,
where hashish almost certainly predated Islam itself. One anti-
hashish legal treatise grumbled: “It was an evil restricted to Persia
until the Tatars took it over. Then it moved on to Baghdad.” By
“Tatars” the author meant people from Central Asia then entering
the eastern Muslim world in repeated waves, most recently Turks
and Mongols. The great door through which they entered Muslim
lands was the space between the Himalayas and the Aral Sea, the
region of modern Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Here the Muslim
world met the fearsome nomadic horse archers of Central Asia.
Central Asian conquerors took control of most of the Muslim
world between the 1100s and the 1500s, and horse archers were the
key to their success. Eventually, Muslim armies developed their
own elite corps of horse archers, called mamluks. Mamluks were
mercenaries who were, or had been, slaves. Normally, mamluks
began as adolescent boys born and raised on the Central Asian
steppes beyond the borders of Islam, where they had learned to
ride and to use a bow on horseback from early childhood. Cap-
tured or sold into slavery, they were taken to Iraq or Syria or Egypt
and shaped into disciplined troops. Separated forever from their
kin, mamluks became Muslims but were normally kept separate
from the Arabic speakers around them, often speaking Turkish
instead. Once fully trained, mamluks were normally manumit-
ted but remained devoted to their masters. Thus, they were not
only militarily potent but politically convenient—disciplined and
professional, with no families, and, therefore, undivided loyalty to
their commander, at least in theory.

WEB.indb 86 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 87

The sway of these foreign mercenaries multiplied after 1000 as

the Muslim world fragmented politically and invaders entered
from east and west. Sometimes, as in Egypt, mamluks seized
power and created their own dynasties. Then, in the mid-1200s
there was another knock at the door beyond the Caspian Sea, an-
nouncing another visitor from the steppes of Central Asia. It was
Genghis Khan. The Mongols were not Muslims, not in a hurry to
convert, and they had created arguably the most effective army in
history. Their capture of Bagdad in 1258 destroyed the caliphate
forever. Eventually, though, like the Seljuk Turks before them and
the Ottoman Turks after them, the Mongols did convert. By around
1500, dynasties of Central Asian origin ruled practically the entire
Muslim world.
The people of Baghdad, Damascus, and Cairo saw mamluks
become a routine fixture of military power, and they learned to
accept new Central Asian overlords, but it was a painful process.
When anti-hashish treatises in Arabic blast Turks and Mongols for
bringing hashish, their accusation must be understood in this larger
context. Almost certainly, the accusation was true. The cannabis
plant had first evolved in Central Asia. Eventually, we will follow
it back to its geographic roots. For now, however, let us turn to the
religious dissidents, some of whom placed themselves squarely
outside Sunni traditions. They are the lead players in our story.

GOD’S UNRULY FRIENDS

The men called Sufis accepted the Qur’an and thought of them-
selves as “God’s Friends,” but they were unruly friends. Main-
stream Sunnis regarded Sufis with stern disapproval, and only
partly because some Sufis ate hashish. In general, Sufis took a
contrasting approach to religion, scorning the proprieties of Sunni
Muslim society.
From the first, Islam contained both world-renouncing and
world-embracing, both prophetic and legalist, currents. The Qur’an
exhorted Muslims to look beyond mundane concerns and lift their
eyes toward heaven, but it also provided detailed instructions on

WEB.indb 87 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 88 Getting High

how to live a Godly life on earth. One could say that the Qur’an
is largely devoted to providing those instructions. The creation
of a divinely ordered society was perhaps the central impulse of
Muhammad’s prophecy. The result was a powerful social and
religious emphasis on law. After the Qur’an, the primary basis
for Islamic law were the words and deeds of Muhammad, called
sunna, and these are not recorded in the Qur’an. Instead, they
were derived from many sources, principally oral traditions that
were painstakingly verified and eventually written down as ha-
diths. Commentary on the sunna was the primary occupation of
religious scholars in what we now call Sunni society. The firmly
world-embracing Sunni outlook was majority and mainstream in
the medieval Muslim world.
And yet, there were always world-renouncers—people disposed
to withdraw from society and seek a different spiritual path. These
were the Sufis, whose name refers to the rough wool cloak they
wore, scorning comfort. They are often described as “mystics,” but
what most helps to understand them is their radical rejection of the
whole Sunni approach to religion, including, notably, its legalism.
Sunnis tried to live Godly lives in society, and their accumulated
legal writings supplied a complex web of guidelines for doing so.
Sufis turned their backs on society and its laws. Sufis put their en-
ergies into a daily quest for a direct encounter with divinity, some-
what as did the Christian friars of medieval Europe. Like European
friars, Sufis might withdraw into the wilderness, subsist on alms,
and devote all their time to prayer and meditation. They might
live together, forming a Sufi order that could multiply its houses
and spread geographically over time. The founders of particular
Sufi orders were spiritual teachers who prescribed a particular
way of seeking to know God—such as meditative techniques—
and attracted followers who adopted the same techniques. These
Sufi masters were regarded as saints after death, and their tombs
became centers of veneration and pilgrimage. Like the Prophet
Muhammad, Sufi masters claimed no divinity for themselves;
rather, they were men who helped other men find God. More than
dissidents disposed to argue against the Sunni rules, Sufis were
nonconformists who simply ignored the rules.

WEB.indb 88 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 89

During the 800s and 900s, when the word hashish still referred
merely to animal fodder or garden weeds, Sufism had become a
familiar and tolerated part of the Muslim world. Gradually, new
Sufi orders appeared, particularly in non–Arabic-speaking regions,
such as Persia and Sindh, at the western margin of India. In the
1200s, a new religious practice grew out of Sufism and went be-
yond it. The new practitioners redoubled the world-renouncing
tendencies present among Sufis, utterly denying themselves the
comforts of a normal life and rejecting social norms in their spiri-
tual quest. Because the redoubled ascetic practice arose among
Sufis, the practitioners were still Sufis in the view of outsiders.
Yet because they were reacting against the respectable Sufism of
their day (partly by eating hashish), we need a different name for
them: dervishes. You may have heard of the whirling variety of
dervishes, and now you know what set them whirling.
The two most important dervish groups were called Haydaris
and Qalandars. Like earlier Sufis, dervishes were followers of
particular spiritual teachers whose teachings outlived them. The
Haydaris were followers of the Persian master named Qutb al-
Din Haydar. In the mid-1100s, Haydar renounced the world and
withdrew from society to live in the wilderness. The legend of his
“discovery” of hashish has often been repeated. One day, the story
goes, Haydar noticed that a particular plant swayed as if in the
breeze, and yet there was no breeze. Curious, he ate some of the
plant, which was cannabis, of course, and he found the result en-
lightening. Thereafter, Haydar taught his followers to eat hashish,
saying that it held spiritual “secrets.” He directed his followers to
plant hashish around his tomb, so that pilgrims who came to visit
it would find a ready supply.
Haydar’s single-handed “discovery” of hashish in 1155 is the
stuff of legend. In truth, the people of northeastern Persia, at the
doorstep of Central Asia, where Haydar supposedly discovered
hashish, already knew all about it. In addition to Persians, many of
his early followers were Turkic speakers who were entering Persia
from Central Asia in these years. Haydar’s followers multiplied
and spread their practice west to Iraq, Syria, and Egypt. They were
not the only dervishes, either.

WEB.indb 89 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 90 Getting High

Qalandars shaved their faces and heads.

A second dervish order, the Qalandars, focused on a second

Persian master, Jamal al-Din Savi, who preached in Damascus in
the 1100s and who also appears, in the literature of later centuries,
as a “discoverer” of hashish. This holy man’s ascetic quest led him
to reside in a cemetery, whereby he enacted his central teaching.
Qalandars were to “die before their death,” renouncing the world
to become social nonentities. Jamal al-Din Savi went practically na-
ked, which exposed him to the elements and (another benefit) kept
people away. Still, he acquired followers in Syria and his teaching
spread to Egypt.
The world upon which Haydaris and Qalandars turned their
backs was a specifically Sunni world. Renouncing family and a
normal social life, they also rejected the Sunni rules for living, the

WEB.indb 90 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 91

shari’a, with its comprehensive guidelines for everything from

civil and criminal law to diet and personal hygiene. Dervishes
flaunted their disregard for normal Muslim proprieties and ad-
opted an intentionally outrageous appearance. Rather than wear-
ing full beards as medieval Muslim men normally did, Qalandars
did the opposite. They shaved their faces, their heads, even their
eyebrows. Haydaris could be recognized by their iron collars,
bracelets, and anklets that symbolized their spiritual self-disci-
pline and mortification of the flesh. Usually not visible, thanks to
minimal clothing (made of hides or leaves, for example) were the
iron rings that Haydaris wore on their genitals as guarantees of
chastity. Dervishes symbolized their rejection of human society
by adorning themselves with bones, horns, and strings of animal
teeth. They played drums and bells as they moved through the
streets. While they traveled extensively, they seldom made the
pilgrimage to Mecca that the Qur’an lists among the obligations of
devout Muslims.
Having “died before their deaths,” dervishes blithely disre-
garded the religious duties of the living. They conspicuously failed
to fast during the month of Ramadan. They would happily drink
wine, but wine was an expensive luxury, and dervishes were men-
dicants who carried a begging bowl. Hashish, on the other hand,
they could afford. The “daughter of the bag” fit the wandering
dervish life perfectly. It eased privations, gladdened the heart, and
made one want to sing and dance. The Sunni legislative reaction
against hashish clearly associated it with dervishes, and also with
some formerly respectable Sufis who had taken up aspects of der-
vish practice as it spread through the Arabic-speaking center of the
Muslim world. Arabic ma’lum, roughly “the poor Sufi’s compensa-
tion,” became one of the more widely recognized nicknames for
hashish.
As the stories about Haydar suggest, the dervishes (and eventu-
ally other Sufis) used hashish not only to ease privations and glad-
den the heart but also in religious meditation. A Qalandar source
gives precise, though plainly idealized, instructions for the ritual.
The virtuous man who wishes to use this drug, which, being law-
ful, is better than wine, should purify himself beforehand, in spirit,

WEB.indb 91 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 92 Getting High

body, and clothing. He should find an appropriate place, whether

alone or in the company of others who share the secret. A place
with murmuring water is best. He should hold the hashish in his
right hand and ask for access to its insights in a lengthy speech
that amounts, in summary paraphrase, to the following: “I am ask-
ing God, Who art generous with both rich and poor, all-powerful
and omniscient, Who brought forth the grass of the field, created
this secret, and disclosed it to those worthy of knowing it, to allow
me its use, protecting me from harm, that I may see things as they
really are.” The Qalandar was then to chew and swallow the hash-
ish, and rinse the remnants from his mouth before chanting the
praise of the Creator. He was to whiten his teeth with antimony,
removing tell-tale signs of the green one, so that the uninitiated
would not discover his secret. As the effect took hold, he was to re-
main serene in demeanor and moderate in both speech and action,
seeking the most delicate food, the most beautiful surroundings,
and the most instructive company, meditating upon cause and ef-
fect, upon doer and deed, upon the speaker and the words spoken,
seeking to understand the eternal knowledge of God and his uni-
versal grace, thus becoming a little more separate from humanity
and moving a little closer to divinity. A Sufi poet wrote that the
green one “made his house into a mosque.”
Hashish fit the Sufi emphasis on ecstatic experience. Spiritual
intoxication, music, and dance, because they diverted one from the
ordinary world, enabled the mystical quest for nearness to God.
Unlike most Muslims, Sufis incorporated music into their poetic lit-
urgies, which they chanted in unison. Voice and words, rather than
instruments or harmony, constituted the main elements of their
music. Sufi music thus stemmed from recitation of the Qur’an and
other standard Muslim prayers, such as the innumerable names of
God. But music encouraged rapture, leading some participants to
dance spontaneously for joy. Contemporary “whirling dervishes”
do a controlled dance-meditation that grows out of this tradition.
Sufi poetry was occasionally dedicated to hashish. More often,
however, it was dedicated to wine or to a lover, in the general
tradition of Arabic and Persian poetry. Among Sufis, such poetry
was interpreted metaphorically, rather as the Song of Solomon, ap-

WEB.indb 92 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 93

parently a love lyric, has been interpreted religiously by Jews and

Christians as symbolizing love of God. One way or another, Su-
fism channeled some of the finest artistic impulses in the medieval
Muslim world. The great poet Rumi was a Persian-born Sufi with
Haydari and Qalandar associates. Followers of Rumi founded the
Mevlevi order, the renowned “whirling dervishes” of today. Still,
the themes of love and intoxication, chanted and danced in a Sufi
lodge, raised straitlaced Sunni suspicions of drug-induced mysti-
cism, which they considered not one bit Muslim.
Sunni jurists were angered by the religious use of hashish. They
expressed concern about secret use in mosques and refuted the
claim (of a Sufi poet) that its usefulness is greater than the sin of us-
ing it. Ibn Tammiyyah, author of one of the principal anti-hashish
treatises, believed that hashish had entered the Arabic-speaking
world with the Mongols, and he compared the religious use of
hashish to certain practices of Christians, practices which, in his
view, however much the Christians might believe in them, were
simply not the correct way to worship God. And if the Sunni reli-
gious establishment did not know the correct way to worship God,
it knew nothing at all. It thoroughly mistrusted ecstatic inspiration
and charismatic masters. The accumulated, collective wisdom of its
religious jurists was the heart of Sunni authority.
Questioning authority, on the other hand, was what the more
radical Sufis were all about. The Abdals, a later dervish order in
what is now Turkey, were apparently full of young runaways who
had broken ties with their elders. The student who had quarreled
with his teacher, the beardless youth defying his father—these
were the sorts who might be seduced away to join the Abdals. Out-
landishly dressed, singing and dancing to mystical music, jeering
at military commanders and judges, the young Abdals proclaimed
that “they would not be true to the Truth” if they failed to annoy
“the people of the Law.” They seem to have succeeded very well at
exasperating their elders and the authorities in general.
In the period 1100–1500, then, mainstream Muslim society was
beleaguered by numerous challengers (religious nonconformists
from within, invaders from without) whom it associated with
hashish. Sufis and dervishes, with their outrageous attire, or lack

WEB.indb 93 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 94 Getting High

of it, may appear innocuous from a modern viewpoint, but from

the medieval Sunni perspective they were seriously heretical.
Consider also that the associations with “recreational” hashish
eating—including poverty, sexual deviance, and a general lack of
respectability—were far from glamorous. It will then be unsurpris-
ing that “hashish eater” became a common slur.
With that slur in mind, and with an understanding of various
tensions around hashish in medieval Muslim society, let us return
to the mentioned 1123 document in which the word hashish—actu-
ally, the word hashish eater—first enters the historical record. The
targets of the slur in the 1123 document were the most famous
hashish eaters ever, the legendary Assassins.

THE ASSASSIN LEGEND

Harry Anslinger featured a popular version of the Assassin legend

in his 1930s campaign to make marijuana illegal throughout the
United States. To clarify the connection between marijuana, mad-
ness, and murder, Anslinger explained that the very word assassin
came from hashish, and he told a chilling tale of an elite corps of
medieval Muslim assassins who consumed hashish to launch their
bloody attacks. Most of his story came from his own imagination,
and other people’s, because this legend had been embroidered
over many centuries. The word assassin in English and many other
European languages does indeed derive from the Arabic word
hashishiyya, hashish eaters. Many other aspects of the Assassin leg-
end have little basis in reality. But can it be that, as many believe
today, history’s most famous hashish eaters never really ate hash-
ish at all?
Let’s begin with the legend itself, which circulated widely in
Europe thanks to The Travels of Marco Polo. On his way to China in
the mid-1200s, the celebrated Venetian traveler had passed through
Syria and Persia, where he heard about a sect that specialized in
assassinating enemy leadership. In an age when poison was the
preferred agent of political murder, these specialist “ashishin” (as
Polo rendered their name) killed only with a dagger, first gaining

WEB.indb 94 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 95

the confidence of the enemy leader, infiltrating his entourage, wait-

ing patiently for an opportunity to get close, and finally striking
before the victim’s bodyguards could react. The assassins rarely
escaped after killing their victims, though. What astounded their
enemies was their discipline and devotion, as one can sense from
another “ashishin” story, wherein a sentry on a high castle rampart
unhesitatingly hurls himself into the abyss when commanded to
do so. Many such stories circulated, apparently. The one related by
Marco Polo attributed the group’s spectacular devotion to its Syr-
ian leader, the Old Man of the Mountain, who reputedly recruited
young men to be assassins by giving them a mysterious drink that
made them lose consciousness. The young men awakened in a
delightful garden where they envisioned the reward that awaited
martyrs in heaven.
Marco Polo’s account of the group was not the first to reach
Western Europe. Writing in the early 1200s, a German chronicler
of the Third Crusade had already described the Old Man of the
Mountain’s use of a vision-producing potion that showed recruits
the delights that would be eternally theirs if they died for the
cause. Many accounts of the group make no mention of a potion,
but they still call them “hashish eaters.” During the high point of
the group’s activities in the 1100s, it seems, that was how the group
was generally known, to Christians and Muslims alike.
The reality behind the Assassin legend, as applied by Anslinger
and others, may go no further than that. The slur hashish eater may
have been directed at the followers of the Old Man of the Mountain
in exactly the spirit that the English slur bastard might be hurled
without any real thought to anyone’s paternity. But maybe there’s
more to it.
Remember, this was an Arabic slur, directed at Muslims by other
Muslims. The objects of the slur, the real people behind the As-
sassin legend, have a considerable and well-documented history.
They do not lack a real name. The Nizari Ismailis were religious
dissenters, as were the Sufis, but whereas Sufis merely thumbed
their noses at the Sunni establishment, Nizari Ismailis wanted to
overthrow it. From a Sunni perspective, they were much more
menacing.

WEB.indb 95 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 96 Getting High

Nizari dissidence sprang from an ongoing dispute about who

represented the legitimate succession of the Prophet Muhammad
in the centuries after his death, which means that Nizaris belonged
to the Shi’a branch of Islam. Muhammad was a political and mili-
tary, in addition to a spiritual, leader. For roughly five hundred
years after Muhammad, leaders called caliphs represented his au-
thority over the entire Muslim world, but only in theory. In fact,
the explosive growth of Islam quickly outran the ability of any
caliph to rule over it from Baghdad, which was the principal seat
of the caliphate. Only the first few caliphs were universally rec-
ognized. Descent from the Prophet’s family offered the strongest
claim to the caliphate, but Muhammad had left no male heir and,
inevitably, conflicting claims appeared.
Without entering into a detailed discussion of particular claims—
who successively became caliph, violating the more legitimate
claim of whomever—let us observe the conflict so to comprehend
the true identity of the Nizaris and, above all, the radical and sub-
versive nature of their anti-Sunni dissidence. The nature of their
dissidence bears directly, as you will see, on the matter of whether
the Nizaris actually ate hashish.
When an “illegitimate” candidate became caliph, the result, in the
eyes of dissenters, was a religious catastrophe. The throne of God’s
representative on earth had been usurped, and things would be out
of kilter until the rightful heir of the Prophet recovered the throne.
In the meantime, each new caliph of the illegitimate line would be a
usurper, too, and the gradual construction of religious law built up
during the reign of usurper caliphs, as well as all their appointments
and decisions, would lack legitimacy. Therefore, the apparently
limited and specific disagreement about who should have become
caliph centuries ago effectively alienated dissenting Shi’a Muslims
from the dominant religious and political power structure of Sunni
Islam. Shiites became a sort of permanent opposition party. And
since their belief found less expression in the law (which belonged
mostly to the Sunni power structure), it focused instead on the au-
thority of charismatic leaders who often claimed descent from the
Prophet. In fact, Shi’a Muslims espoused an alternative lineage of
caliphs-in-waiting, whom they called the imams. The Shi’a main

WEB.indb 96 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 97

branch counted twelve known imams and awaited news of the next
still-unknown one, termed “the hidden imam.” The faithful believed
that the hidden imam would appear one day to reclaim the caliph-
ate, which more or less never happened. Instead, Shiites remained a
powerless and frustrated minority almost everywhere in the Muslim
world, the greatest exception being Persia.
The Persian Nizaris were a splinter group that represented a split
(actually two successive splits) within Shi’a ranks. Nizaris accepted
only the first seven of the “twelve known imams.” After that, they
recognized a different lineage of imams starting with one named
Ismail, hence Nizari Ismailis. People dissatisfied with the exist-
ing order tended to gravitate toward Shi’a groups, and especially
toward the Ismailis, because of their looking-for-a-change orienta-
tion. Ismaili beliefs were notably changeable, often unorthodox,
and above all, secret, revealed only to initiates. Ismailis admitted
a metaphorical reading of the Qur’an, and, like Sufis, they had a
tendency to disregard the accumulated tradition of Sunni religious
law-giving. Compared with other Shiites, Ismailis challenged the
mainstream Sunni order more aggressively. After gaining converts
in Iraq, Persia, Yemen, and Syria, a Hidden Imam revealed himself
and was able to establish an Ismaili caliphate in Egypt in the year
973. This was called the Fatimid dynasty because its legitimacy
depended partly on claims of descent from the Prophet’s daughter,
Fatima. The Fatimid caliphate dominated Egypt for two centuries,
a major eruption of Shi’a power in the heartland of Sunni Islam.
The Nizaris broke away from other Ismailis when their candidate
for Fatimid caliph was murdered in 1095.
Now that we have a better view of the Nizaris, we can better un-
derstand the motivations of both the Nizari assassins and their de-
tractors. Although they did assassinate one high-profile Christian
crusader prince, the Nizaris’ main targets were other Muslims, the
Seljuk Turks who were just then taking over the Baghdad caliph-
ate and the Sunni power structure that went with it. The Sunnis
regarded the Nizari assassinations as treacherous and ignoble, so
they might well hurl an insult into the teeth of the Nizaris: “Hash-
ishiyya! Riffraff! Lowly hashish eaters!” Rare is the blood enemy
not tagged with an insulting name, after all.

WEB.indb 97 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 98 Getting High

But why this particular name? Shi’a groups did have a reputation
for attracting poor and marginal people, so that may account for the
“lowly” part. But Arabic is not without meaningful insults to hurl
at an enemy. Why call the Nizaris hashish eaters if the term lacked
specificity in their case? And if it was a random insult, in which the
particular content of the slur was irrelevant, then why did it stick
so powerfully? After all, we are not trying to understand how an
angry person could call the Nizaris “hashish eaters” in a moment of
pique. To the contrary, this derisive nickname for the group became
so widely known that many European witnesses (not catching the
reference to hashish) thought it was a proper name.
That suggests more than a random insult.
Let’s reason carefully here. No historical source gives any indi-
cation that Nizari assassins consumed any drug to carry out their
assassinations. The Nizari assassin was a one-man sleeper cell,
whose entire efficacy depended on escaping the slightest suspicion
as he gained the confidence of his target. In all credible sources that
specifically mention a drug (and many do not), the drug merely
attracts new recruits with visions of a heavenly reward. Its main
effect is to put them to sleep. No source names hashish, except of
course, by insistently calling the Nizaris “hashish eaters.”
On the other hand, Arabic speakers had every reason to view the
Nizaris as Persians, and they associated hashish with Persia, as we
have seen. The Nizari leadership was unquestionably Persian, and
their liturgical language seems to have been Persian, too, rather
than Arabic. Although the Nizaris had a Syrian offshoot (the most
famous for its daring assassinations), they were in fact primarily a
Persian group. Furthermore, the group’s stronghold lay in north-
east Persia (on the doorstep of Central Asia), the same area where
Haydar supposedly “discovered” hashish and founded the dervish
order that made his name synonymous with hashish.
Also very salient for Arabic speakers was the group’s radical
religious dissidence. In their commitment to worldly struggle,
not to mention their violent tactics, the Nizaris were totally un-
like the contemplative Sufis. Still, both were antinomians (nomos is
Greek for law), which means that neither had much time for Sunni
proprieties and prohibitions. For the Nizaris, the reappearance of

WEB.indb 98 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 99

the Hidden Imam could trigger a totally new dispensation, under

which the faithful would no longer be bound by the old religious
laws at all. For example, in the year 1164, the group’s Persian
leader, ensconced in one of the Nizaris’ impregnable castles built
on mountain peaks, proclaimed a message from the Hidden Imam,
whose revelation he indicated to be imminent. According to Nizari
accounts, to make the proclamation the leader assembled the faith-
ful as if to pray—but facing away from Mecca, instead of toward it.
He then invited them to feast during what had been, until that mo-
ment, a time of obligatory fasting. The Nizaris’ new legal dispen-
sation was announced in Syria that same year, and hostile Sunni
sources there reported scandalous debauchery, incest, and wine
drinking after the announcement. They did not mention hashish.
Perhaps they did not have to.
In sum, it seems inescapable that, whether by ethnic profiling or
because of religious prejudice, the Arabic-speaking Sunni enemies
of the Nizaris did associate them with hashish, and not merely as
a random slur. Surely that is why the Arabic nickname “hashish
eaters” stuck to them so firmly. Given what we’ve learned about
the historical context, the idea was hardly absurd, whether preju-
diced or not. Yet hashish was a symptom, not a cause of the Sunni
quarrel with the Nizaris. The Sunni legal establishment had not
yet passed collective judgment on hashish as a drug in the 1100s.
When that happened gradually in the 1200s and 1300s, the Nizari
assassins were irrelevant to the discussion. The notion that hashish
could directly incite violence seems quite absent from the medieval
Muslim world.

NOT FOR EVERYBODY

The Muslim world’s experience with psychotropic cannabis, span-

ning centuries and continents, is a key piece of the drug’s global
history. The main lesson I glean from it is that, historically, canna-
bis drugs have never been for everybody.
As in the Atlantic World, cannabis users in the Muslim world
tended to be marginal in some way. They were often religious

WEB.indb 99 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 100 Getting High

or philosophical nonconformists and poor laborers, often ethni-

cally distinct from the majority. As in the United States, the most
famous cannabis users of the Muslim world were flamboyant cul-
tural dissidents who marginalized themselves from mainstream
society and who believed that the drug helped them gain spiritual
insights. There is something undeniably hippielike about the early
dervishes, with their outrageous appearance, their peripatetic life-
style, their declarations of universal peace and love, and their glee-
ful going against the grain of mainstream society, disregarding its
conventions and taboos, refusing to recognize the legitimacy of its
constituted authorities.
Clearly, the prohibition of alcohol for observant Muslims did not
create societies that ate hashish the way Europeans drank wine and
beer. According to UN figures, annual prevalence of cannabis use
in the Muslim world is 1 to 3 percent today. While generally disap-
proving, Muslim attitudes toward hashish have been mostly toler-
ant, however. Over centuries, eating (and later, smoking) hashish
got users in trouble, but not too much trouble. Despite the stark
rhetoric of anti-hashish jurists, the green one was tolerated as a
minor vice, less sinful than wine, less apt to result in violence, and
always, less expensive than alcohol, which remained the euphori-
ant of choice, insofar as we can tell. Once established in the years
1100–1500, that general pattern apparently lasted more or less until
the twentieth century, when international agreements resulted in a
more restrictive climate.
The sprawling community of Muslim faithful converged at
the crossroads of Europe, Asia, and Africa, the world’s grand
historical bazaar of cultural innovations, when hashish appeared
in it around 1100. It was from there that psychoactive cannabis
spread around the world. When “modern hashish” (the concen-
trated resin of many plants) appeared more recently, it too spread
through the Muslim world and became largely identified with it.
The hashish that went to Europe and even, eventually, the United
States seems to have carried with it the dreamy, tolerant ethos of
Egyptian Sufism.
French soldiers noticed hashish in Egypt when Napoleon took
an army there, disastrously, in 1798, and they returned with it to

WEB.indb 100 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Medieval Hashish 101

France, where it briefly became part of a vogue for things exotic

and “Oriental.” Europeans wanted Chinese silks and porcelains,
Persian carpets, and a nice cup of that exotic drink, tea. They
wanted to read One Thousand and One Nights in sensational transla-
tions, and also the provocative verses of Omar Khayyam, a Persian
mathematician and astronomer whose successful free translation
into English made his poetry better known in that language than in
Persian. Just as alcohol represented Europe in this way of thinking,
opium represented China, and hashish represented the Muslim
world. Europe’s most avant-garde writers wondered what they
could learn from both opium and hashish.
Hashish eating in the 1800s was confined to a few bohemians
and free-thinking artists and writers, especially French and En-
glish, in search of exotic experience and stimulus to the imagina-
tion. The roll call of participants is short but impressive. Honoré de
Balzac and Victor Hugo, two of the most important French writers
of the century, belonged to a Parisian Hashish Eaters’ Club in the
1840s. Club members, who sometimes wore turbans to enhance the
mood, reported synesthesia—seeing sounds, hearing colors—and
described magic-carpet voyages and spectacular visions that were
presumably worth all the effort: “My eyelashes grew ever longer
without stopping and, like gold thread, rolled up on small ivory
spinning wheels.” Others who certainly experimented with hash-
ish included Charles Baudelaire and Arthur Rimbaud. So, prob-
ably, did Alexandre Dumas, who has a hugely exoticizing descrip-
tion of a hashish experience in The Count of Monte Cristo. Altering
consciousness was a Romantic predilection, one might say.
Hashish had a parallel but more limited nineteenth-century
vogue in the United States, where there were fewer young aristo-
crats to destroy themselves with tragic abandon. A 1850s Atlantic
Monthly travelogue recounted the experience of eating hashish in
Damascus, and a young man from Poughkeepsie, New York, ex-
perimented with double doses of Tilden’s Extract, a patent medi-
cine containing hashish, then described his terrifying visions in a
book, The Hasheesh Eater. Even a Louisa May Alcott story, “Perilous
Play,” warned fashionable girls away from hashish confections
in 1869. There was a Turkish Hashish Pavilion at Philadelphia’s

WEB.indb 101 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 102 Getting High

Centennial Exposition in 1876. Harper’s Magazine even reported

on a Hashish Parlor, something like an upscale opium den, where
“male and female patrons of the better class” sampled hashish
confections in 1883 New York. Hashish extracts like Tilden’s were
easily available in U.S. pharmacies, but how widely isn’t clear. Cer-
tainly, they were not as popular as extracts from opium. Although
various opium extracts became quite standard nineteenth-century
pain killers (also used as soporifics and antidiarrhetics), most
people in the United States had still barely heard of hashish around
1900 when marijuana cigarettes appeared in the brown hands of
migrant farm workers and New Orleans stevedores. Even people
who had heard of both hashish and marijuana found it difficult
to make the connection between dreamy hashish and “the killer
weed.”
Whether in a hashish confection or a marijuana cigarette, though,
cannabis drugs weren’t for everyone in the twentieth-century
United States, or anywhere else in the Atlantic World. They have
never been exactly “normal,” anywhere, it seems, even when not
illegal. Hashish was certainly never “normal” in the medieval
Muslim world. The poor who resorted to the green one instead of
wine couldn’t afford to be “normal,” so to speak, and Sufis, who
regarded hashish as mind-expanding, had no wish to be.
But what about India? If cannabis drugs were normal in any
society throughout their history, surely it was India. Promoters of
marijuana have confidently claimed that it was “the wine of India.”
And how about Central Asia, the place where cannabis originates
and where human beings first used it?

WEB.indb 102 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 5

Asian Origins

T his chapter traces the origins of cannabis back to prehistoric

Central Asia. Our most intense scrutiny will go to the Indian
subcontinent, where cannabis drugs have a three-thousand-year
history. Then we will see how the cannabis plant was transported
around prehistoric Central Asia by steppe nomads who applied
it to their funeral rites. Finally, we’ll consider what people were
apparently doing with psychoactive cannabis before the dawn of
civilization.

HISTORIC INDIA

India is the proverbial home of cannabis drugs, which is why the

U.S. counterculture sought inspiration there. Allen Ginsberg’s 1966
Atlantic Monthly manifesto, “The Great Marijuana Hoax,” aptly
exemplifies the counterculture’s general view of India. Ginsberg
wrote this passage while smoking marijuana to illustrate its effects:

In sound good health I smoked legal ganja (as marijuana is termed in

India, where it is traditionally used in preference to alcohol), bought
from government tax shops in Calcutta, in a circle of devotees, yogis,
and hymn-singing pious Shaivite worshipers in the burning ground
at Nimtallah Ghat in Calcutta, where it was the custom of these

103

WEB.indb 103 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 104 Getting High

respected gentlemen to meet on Tues. and Saturday nights, smoke

before an improvised altar of blossoms, sacramental milk-candy &
perhaps a fire taken from the burning wooden bed on which lay
a newly dead body, of some friend perhaps, likely a stranger if a
corpse is a stranger, pass out the candy as God’s gift to friend and
stranger, and sing holy songs all night, with great strength and
emotion, addressed to different images of the Divine Spirit. Ganja
was there considered a beginning of sadhana (Yogic path or disci-
pline) by some; others consider the Ascetic Yogi Shiva Himself to
have smoked marijuana; on His birthday marijuana is mixed as a
paste with almond milk by the grandmothers of pious families and
imbibed as a sacrament by this polytheistic nation, considered by
some a holy society. The professors of English at Benares University
brought me a bottle for the traditional night of Shivaratri, birthday
of the Creator & Destroyer who is the patron god of this oldest con-
tinuously inhabited city on Earth. “BOM BOM MAHADEV!” (Boom
Boom Great God!) is the Mantra Yogis cry as they raise the ganja
pipe to their brows before inhaling.

Ginsberg has real knowledge of his topic, obviously, and he’s quite
correct in linking ganja, the great Hindu deity Shiva, and the holy
men he calls yogis—but his description greatly exaggerates the role
of cannabis drugs in Indian civilization. Popular histories of mari-
juana have perpetuated this error for half a century. In fact, good
information on cannabis drugs in India is amazingly scarce before
the twentieth century.
India’s cannabis drugs came to the attention of modern Europe-
ans early in the age of European seaborne imperialism and coloni-
zation, when sailors and explorers sent back reports of a cannabis
drink called bhang, a word that the reader may recall. An early
Portuguese chronicler in India, Garcia da Orta, remarked that his
Indian servants told him bhang improved their mood, stimulated
their appetite, and helped them work. “I believe that it is so gener-
ally used and by such a number of people that there is no mystery
about it,” he wrote. During the period of British colonial rule in
India, cannabis drugs were regulated and taxed. In fact, a British
colonial study, the 1893–1894 Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Com-
mission, is often cited as the most serious large-scale social study

WEB.indb 104 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 105

of marijuana ever undertaken. The commission found that “hemp

drugs” did not constitute a social problem and should not be out-
lawed. Still, as with hashish in the Muslim world, the prevalence
of cannabis drugs in India has been blown out of proportion by the
Western imagination.
Indians of the 1890s distinguished systematically between vari-
ous cannabis drugs and held contrasting opinions about them.
For starters, there was ganja, a Hindi word we have already en-
countered in Jamaica; ganja was the flowering top of the female
plant. Next, there was charas; charas was the concentrated resin of
many flowering tops, what is today called “hashish.” But the most
important cannabis drug in Indian history is undoubtedly bhang,
the drink described by Garcia da Orta. To make the bhang drink,
Indians traditionally used the leaves of the entire plant, washed,
boiled, and ground to a pulp. They added a spice mix including
saffron, rose petals, poppy seeds, black pepper, dried ginger, cara-
way, clove, cinnamon, cucumber seeds, melon seeds, cardamom,
almonds, pistachio, or nutmeg, and finally sugar. Both the bhang
pulp and spice paste were then combined with liquid. The liquid
necessarily included milk, rich with butter fat, that gradually be-
came infused with cannabinoids as the bhang simmered for many
hours before being strained and chilled. Ice cream can be made
with similar ingredients, as can various green psychoactive confec-
tions, which Ginsberg described on Shiva’s birthday.
Bhang is also the Indian name of the whole cannabis plant,
a name transplanted with that meaning to the Swahili coast of
Africa. One of the most ancient Indian sacred texts, the Atharva
Veda, mentions the bhang plant. The Atharva Veda was composed
before 1000 BCE. That’s one thousand years before the Common
Era, which is to say over three thousand years ago, a meaningful
duration even on the scale of global history. By grouping bhang
with the sacred hallucinogen soma, the Atharva Veda indicates its
psychoactive powers. Vedic mention of cannabis has often been
used to signal the plant’s deep roots in Indian life, and rightly so,
at least regarding the antiquity of its ceremonial use. And yet, the
next prominent mention of psychoactive cannabis in India comes a
long, long time—twenty centuries—after the Atharva Veda.

WEB.indb 105 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 106 Getting High

Here’s all the documentary evidence in a nutshell. From around

1000 BCE on, cannabis appears in a mere handful of existing
written texts, mostly pharmacopeias, until the year 1050 CE, two
thousand years later, when we get a list of Sanskrit synonyms for
bhang. Then around the year 1300 we get another dribble of clues,
nicknames suggestive of psychoactive use, including, in its earliest
recorded appearance, the word ganja. In the 1500s, we get a few
European reports, already mentioned. The main one is Garcia da
Orta’s description of the bhang drink:

The profit from its use is for the man to be outside himself, and to
be raised above all cares and anxieties, and it makes some break into
a foolish laugh. I hear that many women take it when they want to
dally and flirt with men. It is also said, but it may not be true, that
the great captains, in ancient times, used to drink it with wine or
with opium, that they might rest from their work, be without care,
and be able to sleep; for the long vigils of such became a torment to
them. The great Sultan Bahadur said to Martim Affonso de Souza, to
whom he wished every good thing and to whom he told his secrets,
that when at night he wanted to go to Portugal, Brazil, Turkey, Ara-
bia, or Persia, he only had to take a little BANGUE.

And that’s about all the primary-source evidence currently avail-

able in the world’s libraries concerning the use of cannabis drugs
in India before the 1800s. Much more could potentially be added
by primary research in Indian languages, no doubt. For now, how-
ever, we have breathtakingly little evidence to represent centuries
of a supposedly common practice.
What’s going on? Indian kingdoms with elaborate, highly re-
fined cultures and writing stretch back as far as civilization itself.
References to wine are commonplace in early Hebrew, Greek, and
Latin writing. What happened to the historical evidence of can-
nabis drugs in India? Part of the answer is that India’s historical
record as a whole is a bit sketchy when compared to other places.
Indians have been reading and writing longer than any Europeans,
but the earliest script has not yet been deciphered, and much of
what historical Indians wrote has disappeared. The chief writing
surface in classical India was, in fact, dried palm leaves. India’s hot

WEB.indb 106 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 107

and humid climate eventually dissolved all palm leaf documents,

along with the subcontinent’s ancient wooden cities. Both written
and physical traces of the past are consequently less abundant in
India than in the Middle East, Europe, or China. Nonetheless, there
are sources enough to say with confidence that, during the years
when Hebrews, Greeks, and Romans were drinking all that wine,
Indians were drinking wine, too.
Fermented drinks were very much on the scene in ancient India.
The fabulous diversity of India—its thousands of deities and devo-
tions, its society so compartmentalized by caste and region—al-
lows only a few basic generalizations on this matter. Here they are.
First, bhang definitely did not substitute for wine, which was plen-
tiful in the cities of classical India. Modern India’s dominant reli-
gions, both Hindu and Muslim, discourage alcohol consumption,
but the dominant religion of classical India, roughly 500 BCE to
500 CE, was Buddhism, which concentrated its discipline on mon-
asteries and, at least in practice, did not limit wine consumption
among the general urban populace. Classical sources depict wine-
drenched festivals, scenes of drunken revelry involving nobles,
urban elites, prostitutes, entire communities. Dutiful housewives
were instructed by the Kama Sutra to keep a bit of the good stuff
(wine, mind you) on hand. Imported wine was uniformly the drink
of royal courts, and India, normally divided into myriad small
kingdoms, had many royal courts and droves of tipsy courtiers.
Taverns flew banners to announce themselves. Classical Indian
medical treatises praised wine at length. Classical Indians did not
identify with wine the way that classical Greeks did, nor mass-
produce it with Roman organizational zeal, but drink it with gusto
they surely did. Buddhism declined and eventually disappeared
from India about a thousand years ago. Thereafter, Indians (espe-
cially high-caste Brahmins) took an increasingly dim view of alco-
hol. Still, alcohol hardly vanished from Indian life, and the British
promoted new forms of it.
Let us return, however, to our one rich and accessible pre-
twentieth-century Indian source in English, the famous Indian
Hemp Drugs Commission Report of the 1890s. The unique virtue of
this source is that the commission tried systematically to find how

WEB.indb 107 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 108 Getting High

and where cannabis grew in India, how it was regarded, how and
where it was consumed, and by whom. Its information-gathering
drew on thousands of witnesses over a period of years, and though
the result is patchy, the broad outlines are clear. To begin, the com-
mission found an enormous contrast between bhang (the drink)
and ganja.
The bhang drink was consumed seasonally and communally. It
was made mostly from cannabis that grew wild or with minimal
cultivation. Because of this, and because it was usually made from
the leaves of both male and female plants, the bhang drink was
only mildly psychoactive. Customs varied regionally, as do all
things Indian, and generally bhang was more northern than south-
ern. The drink was a traditional accompaniment of celebrations,
such as weddings. Certain religious festivals called for it specifi-
cally. On the last day of the Bengali festival of Durga Puja, for ex-
ample, families offered cups of bhang to their guests, and all were
expected “to partake thereof, or at least place it to the lips in token
of acceptance,” according to the 1890s commission report. Depend-
ing on the locality, just about everybody, up and down the social
hierarchy, might drink bhang during a festival, and then might not
drink it again for a year. It appears that men drank bhang more
than did women, but bhang was often made and drunk in a do-
mestic setting. Few considered it to be harmful.
Traditional patterns suggest that bhang-drinking may well have
occurred in Indian villages from time immemorial. Bhang is made
by the same basic technique—pounding, steeping, and straining—as
prescribed by the Rig Veda for soma, the hallucinogenic drink of the
priestly caste of preclassical India, more than three thousand years
ago. Strainers that might have been used for the bhang drink have
been found, too, by archeologists excavating Harappa and Mohenjo
Daro, principal cities of the Indus Valley civilization (of modern
Pakistan), unquestionably the earliest in South Asia, thriving a full
millennium before the Rig Veda. Overall, the Indian Hemp Drugs
Commission found the bhang drink integrated with many ancient
and pervasive rhythms of Indian life. Most of the commission’s in-
formants believed outlawing bhang would be viewed, by Indians at
large, as an unwarranted colonial repression of established tradition.

WEB.indb 108 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 109

Ganja and charas, on the other hand, were something else again.
Here, not to put too fine a point on it, were the serious drug us-
ers: men (exclusively) who tended to consume daily, usually by
smoking ganja or charas in a stemless chillum. The chillum may
have been invented by pulling the bowl off a hookah. Its unusual
stemless shape requires a seemingly clumsy maneuver to smoke it
while keeping it upright. But the maneuver gave the chillum an ad-
vantage in India. Smokers often passed a chillum around, and each
smoker inhaled through his own cupped hand, not placing his lips
on the pipe itself and thus avoiding an indirect contact forbidden
by caste strictures.
The British had a particularly good grasp of who, and how
many, smoked ganja because they licensed its production, super-
vised its distribution, and taxed its sale. (Clearly, this information
is relevant to the commission’s final decision not to prohibit can-
nabis drugs.) Their production took place entirely on “a compact
tract having a radius of about sixteen miles,” called the Ganja
Mahal (I am not making that up), in what was then Bengal, today
Bangladesh. There the ground was prepared meticulously, the
plants trimmed to encourage growth of the flowering tops, and the
males culled to prevent the females from going to seed. (Note that
the Ganja Mahal produced sin semilla.) Bengal ganja was consid-
ered the best ganja in India, and the Ganja Mahal was the largest
producer, sending its product across the entire north. Therefore,
the commission was able to make quite informed estimates about
the size of the consuming market, district by district, especially for
the populous province of Bengal. By their calculation, the ganja-
smoking population of rural districts was almost always under 1
percent, contrasting with urban Calcutta, at 5.4 percent. For the
province as a whole, they estimated that ganja smokers amounted
to something like one in fifty adult males.
One in fifty may be an undercount, of course. Still, the number is
remarkably small by any standard. Unlike the “almost everybody”
descriptions of occasional bhang drinking, ganja had a narrow
social profile, according to the commission. Most generally, ganja
users were men of the lower classes, whether Hindu or Muslim.
They were village farmers, tradesmen, and artisans, fishermen and

WEB.indb 109 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 110 Getting High

boatmen, day laborers and night watchmen. They were domestic

servants of all kinds, such as laundrymen, doormen, porters, and
the men who carried their “betters” through the dusty streets in
covered sedan chairs. The report said that regular ganja use by
such men was normally moderate and associated with their labors,
and that, although clearly a marker of low social status, it was not
considered a sign of particular dissipation. Aboriginal tribesmen
and hill people all over India smoked ganja, too. And so, finally,
did the wandering mendicants whom Ginsberg called yogis, men
who made religious use of ganja.
The commission put these holy men first on its list of ganja smok-
ers. We will call them Sannyasins, because the term expresses their
world view. Sannyasins practice sannyasa, a basic concept of Hin-
duism. Sannyasa means the renunciation of a normal life, giving
away one’s possessions, withdrawing from society, and devoting
oneself to prayer and spiritual discipline. Sannyasins try to disap-
pear into the universe, become one with the cosmos, so to speak,
even before death. Sound familiar? World renouncers, again, I’m
afraid. In fact, the fakirs often mentioned in the Commission Report
were basically Sufis in an Indian incarnation, Sufism being strongly
present among the Muslims of the subcontinent. Indian Sannyasins
shared a basic ascetic practice with historical Qalandars or Francis-
can friars. All intentionally “mortified the flesh,” seeking spiritual
transcendence.
The ascetic practice of India was the oldest and biggest of all.
Early Indian ascetics sometimes composed a substantial portion of
the population. Buddhism (and possibly all later ascetic practices)
emerged from this tradition. Among Hindus, world renouncers had
links to the larger society because of the shared ideal of sannyasa.
Sannyasa was the last stage of an ideal Hindu life, although ideal
lives were surely no more common in ancient India than anywhere
else. Still, all men except those of the lowest caste were supposed
to become wandering mendicants at the end of their lives. Today,
in popular parlance, India’s wandering holy men are called babas
(fathers, grandfathers). In the cultural scheme of ancient India, then,
asceticism was a consensual religious value. Even those who didn’t
attempt it—most men didn’t, women didn’t at all—respected those

WEB.indb 110 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 111

Shiva depicted as a meditating ascetic.

who did. In the 1890s, the commission reported that, in general, In-
dians were quite tolerant of the “grandfathers” who rarely bothered
to conceal themselves from passersby when they huddled in a circle
to share a chillum.
Babas sharing a chillum were likely to dedicate it to the awesome
Lord Shiva, one of the three chief Hindu deities. An alakh, a ritual
invocation pronounced with the first puff of a chillum, is today
normally addressed to Shiva. It can be long or short, a summons,
a request, a declaration of well-being, calling Shiva “Mahdeva,”
or Great Lord, and thereby acknowledging a special devotion. An
anthropologist of the 1960s heard a baba say: “Hello Shiva, you
come here. I want to one chillum together smoking.” Importantly,
Shiva was himself a practitioner of the ascetic arts, himself a yogi
often depicted meditating in the lotus position. Ganja helped the

WEB.indb 111 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 112 Getting High

Sannyasins detach themselves from the world, meditate, and en-

dure the physical privation of their sannyasa. Many nonascetic
Indians also worship Shiva and drink bhang in his name. Shiva’s
luxuriant mythology has been embellished with stories declaring
him Lord of Bhang and describing how he brought the plant down
from the sacred mountain for the benefit of mankind.
The 1890s commission presented little information on charas,
the most concentrated, and rarest, cannabis drug. Charas was used
interchangeably with ganja in Punjab, the far northwest of the
country. Elsewhere in India, however, it was virtually unknown.
In fact, practically all charas seemed to be imported from outside
India. Many of the commission’s informants regarded charas as a
new and not-very-Indian phenomenon. Unlike what we can see of
bhang in the 1890s reportage, neither ganja nor charas conjures vi-
sions of Vedic continuities.
When did people learn to cull the male plants, trimming the fe-
males to stimulate the growth of their resinous buds, spacing them
widely apart in full sun, and, no doubt, selectively breeding the
most psychoactive strains, to make ganja? The word ganja appears
in the historical record around 1300 CE, as already noted. That
means sin semilla technique was invented more than a thousand
years ago, but where and when? We’ll have to look in Central Asia,
because little more can be said, for now, about the history of can-
nabis drugs in India.
First, let’s take stock of our Indian findings. We’ve identified a
tradition of “normal,” community-wide cannabis use, one span-
ning possibly three thousand years, in the traditional bhang drink
of northern India. Historical bhang drinking was connected to
religious observance, as during Durga Puja, but it was more for
pleasure than insight, and thus basically recreational. Moreover,
the Indian case has reaffirmed the historical affinity between can-
nabis drugs and poor laborers who use it to make simple, repeti-
tive tasks more bearable. On the other hand, an ample majority of
Indians, past and present, seem more likely to sample wine than
any cannabis drug. Finally, we’ve found that the most dedicated
users of ganja in historic India have been religious visionaries who
intentionally sought the margin of normal life.

WEB.indb 112 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 113

Indian myths say that Shiva brought the bhang plant down from
the Himalayas that define the northern edge of the subcontinent.
That makes sense, because the people whose sacred liturgies be-
came the Vedas entered India themselves from the north around
1500 BCE. They were coming from the Eurasian steppes, a region
that plays a surprisingly important role in our story.

THE PREHISTORIC EURASIAN STEPPES

Across Eurasia, from the Black Sea to Mongolia, stretch eight mil-
lion square kilometers of plains too arid to support agriculture.
From the perspective of the Atlantic World, the Eurasian steppes
seem remote indeed—but they are actually central to global his-
tory. Psychoactive use of cannabis on and around the steppes is
the oldest about which we have direct evidence. Among written
sources, only Herodotus, the Greek “Father of History,” has much
to say about our topic, which is otherwise mostly prehistoric.
Therefore, the following discussion will depend especially on ar-
chaeology. First, though, fascinating linguistic evidence helps get
a fix on the Vedic people, who certainly brought psychoactive can-
nabis to India if it wasn’t there already. To approach that evidence,
we’ll return momentarily to India, where a British scholar William
Jones noticed something about Sanskrit as he studied the Vedas in
the 1780s.
Jones believed that Sanskrit bore a clear family resemblance
to Latin and Greek. He was quite correct. In fact, Sanskrit, along
with the language of neighboring Iran, Farsi, bears a family
resemblance to European languages in general. How did the
resemblance come about? Scholars have been pondering that
question for two centuries now. One of their tools has been “his-
torical linguistics,” a field of study that was invented, more or
less, to address this very question. A family resemblance, the
thinking goes, can only result from common descent. All the
tongues in what historical linguists began to call—in a tribute to
Jones’s foundational insight—the Indo-European language fam-
ily must have branched from a single trunk that sprouted many

WEB.indb 113 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 114 Getting High

thousands of years ago, somewhere in the region of the Black

Sea. By modern calculations that ancestral tongue (called Proto
Indo-European, because it is strictly theoretical) would have ex-
isted around 4000–3000 BCE. It would have been the language of
the Eurasian steppes at the time when steppe dwellers began to
herd cattle and live in wagons, pioneering a nomadic herdsman’s
way of life. Because it was never written, Proto Indo-European
can be reconstructed only indirectly, by identifying commonali-
ties in languages that descend from it. Like a composite sketch
drawn from the descriptions of various eyewitnesses, historical
linguistics provides a rough likeness at best. Still, it tells us that
the speakers of Proto Indo-European were patrilineal, sacrificed
horses to sky gods, and used cannabis.
To trace this extremely ancient history, one speaks in millennia,
as follows. In the third millennium, from 3000 to 2000 BCE, horse
nomads of the steppes spread from the region north of the Black
Sea far to the east, all the way to the Altai Mountains. The Altai
Mountains partially interrupt the steppe, in Central Asia; beyond
lies Mongolia. Central Asia has great relevance to our story be-
cause it seems to be the original homeland of the cannabis plant,
where undomesticated varieties of it still grow along the road. If
eastward-moving steppe nomads did not have cannabis already,
they got it here.
In the second millennium, between 2000 and 1000 BCE, the
steppes were fully “opened,” acquiring their preeminent world-
historical function as the migratory highway, trade crossroads, and
strategic heart of Asia. Within a few hundred years of 1600 BCE,
chariot technology, which apparently first arose on the edge of the
steppes, spread to both ends of the east–west corridor, appearing
in the Middle East and along China’s northern frontier. At the same
time, India saw the arrival of the chariot-driving, horse-sacrificing
Vedic people. Before leaving the steppes, the Vedic people seem
to have paused for a few centuries on the doorstep of Central Asia
(the gap between the Aral Sea and the Himalayas), before descend-
ing into India with their Indo-European language, their herds of
cattle, and their bhang drink. Although largely desert, this Central
Asian doorstep had rich agricultural oases where Russian arche-

WEB.indb 114 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 115

ologists have unearthed what they believe to be temples that made

and dispensed mind-altering drinks similar to soma or bhang.
The evidence includes poppies, the pollen of prehistoric ephedra,
and traces of cannabis. To find psychoactive drinks dispensed at a
temple would be predictable, rather than surprising. Among the
Vedic people, soma was drunk only during sacred rituals, and only
by Brahmins, the priestly caste.
In the last millennium before the Common Era, between 1000
BCE and 1 CE, a new trick of Asia’s mobile pastoralists made chari-
ots outmoded. That innovation was learning to fight on horseback,
and the crucial technologies were stirrups, which freed the hands
from holding on, and the “composite bow” (composed of wood,
bone, sinew, and glue), short enough to be easily handled in the
saddle, powerful enough eventually to pierce armor. Stirrups,
the composite bow, abundant mounts, and thousands of hours of
practice made steppe warriors into horse archers like the mam-
luks whom we have already encountered in the medieval Muslim
world. Horse archers could let fly ten to twenty arrows a minute,
left- or right-handed, while galloping toward or away from (or in
circles around) their enemies. Nothing so impressed anyone about
them as their devastating effectiveness in warfare.
These steppe nomads of the period between 1000 BCE and 1 CE
emerge vividly in a combination of archeological and literary evi-
dence. The Eurasian steppe is treeless and dotted with thousands of
easily visible mounds under which lie tombs from the last millen-
nium BCE. Because these tomb-mounds are so obvious, most have
been plundered over the centuries. Still, many have yielded helpful
archeological information. A few have been “frozen tombs.” These
flooded soon after the burial and remained in solid permafrost un-
til they were discovered and excavated by Russian archeologists in
the twentieth century. Frozen tombs preserved the tattooed bodies
of their occupants, clothing, weapons, the world’s oldest “Persian”
carpet, and surprising physical evidence of psychoactive cannabis
use. We’ll look at it in a moment.
A rare bit of literary evidence will help interpret the archaeol-
ogy. It comes from the illustrious Greek historian Herodotus, who
wrote in the mid-400s BCE. Herodotus visited the northern shore

WEB.indb 115 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 116 Getting High

of the Black Sea and wrote at length about the steppe people. He
called them Scythians, and they became the European archetype of
frightful steppe “barbarians.” (The ancient Greeks called most non-
Greeks “barbarians.”) Unlike later steppe people (Huns and Mon-
gols, for example), Scythian horse archers were often blond and
blue-eyed. Nazi myth-makers liked to imagine them as “Aryan”
warrior forebears. Herodotus believed that among the Scythians
were female warriors called Amazons, and archeologists have
indeed found tombs of Scythian women buried with weapons. At
one point, after describing the kind of lavish royal funeral in which
scores of servants were executed and interred along with their king
to accompany him to the underworld, Herodotus describes an act
of self-purification practiced by surviving Scythian mourners after
the tomb was sealed. The famous passage is often cited but rarely
quoted in full, which is too bad:

After the burial, those engaged in it have to purify themselves,

which they do in the following way. First they soap and wash their
heads. Then, to cleanse their bodies, they act as follows: they make a
small structure by fixing in the ground three sticks inclined towards
one another and stretching felt cloth around them as tightly as pos-
sible. Inside the structure a dish is placed upon the ground, and into
it a number of red-hot stones, and then some cannabis seed.
Cannabis, a plant that grows in Scythia, is very like flax, only
much coarser and taller. Some grows wild; some is produced by
cultivation. The Thracians make garments of cannabis fiber which
closely resemble flaxen linen—so much so, indeed, that if a person
has never seen cannabis he is sure to think the garments are of flax,
and unless he is very experienced in such matters, he will not know
of which material they are.
The Scythians, as I said, take some of this cannabis seed, and,
crawling under the felt coverings, throw it upon the red-hot stones,
where it fills the enclosure with vapor as in a Greek steam bath, and
the Scythians, delighted, shout for joy. The vapor replaces a water
bath, for they never wash their bodies with water.

Herodotus often wrote from hearsay, his knowledge of Scythia

was limited to one visit of a few months, and he was known to re-
peat a tall tale or two. So we need to consider, for starters, whether

WEB.indb 116 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 117

Scythian smoking set from a frozen tomb.

this account is credible at all. And what better corroboration than

to find the very equipment that Herodotus described?
In the foothills of the Altai Mountains at a place called Pazyryk,
early-twentieth-century Russian archeologist Sergei Rudenko
found several frozen tombs containing two complete “smoking
sets” (his term) exactly as described by Herodotus. Each was
composed of (1) six wooden rods perforated at the top and tied
together with a leather thong, (2) a leather or felt covering, and (3)
a four-legged bronze brazier filled with crushed stone. The bra-
ziers’ bronze handles were covered with bark so that they could
be lifted when hot. Inside the braziers were cannabis seeds, some
charred. Rudenko also found a small leather flask with unburned
cannabis seeds attached to one of the wooden rods. The leather,

WEB.indb 117 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 118 Getting High

felt, and wood had been preserved only because of the permafrost.
Rudenko found the rods in every frozen tomb he opened. He be-
lieved that cannabis was being used not just after burials but as an
everyday “narcotic” (his term), and by both women and men.
But were the Scythians really getting high in this way? Because
cannabis seeds do not contain much (if any) THC, the Scythian
technique would work psychoactively only if “smokers” were
throwing the seeded, flowering tops of cannabis on the hot stones,
rather than seeds alone. Moistened flowering tops would have
emitted a mixture of smoke and steam as described by Herodotus.
The ash, which was not found, would surely have washed away
when the tombs flooded. There are other reports of this sort of
“smoking” by related peoples who threw (unidentified) green
plants on a fire to inhale the smoke. Similarly, temple incense in
the ancient world as a whole involved inhaling the smoke of a
smoldering censer in an enclosed space. A 2013 archaeological
find in northern Pakistan suggests a similar practice in caves along
the Kunar River in prehistoric times. On balance, though there are
skeptics, archeologists today generally accept that the Scythians
inhaled psychoactive cannabis smoke.
A close reading of Herodotus suggests that a psychoactive strain
of cannabis was already separate from hemp. The people of the
steppe had relatively little use for hemp fiber because, as with
herding societies generally, their animals supplied abundant wool
and leather to take the place of plant fibers. The frozen tombs
contained hemp fiber only in the stitching of a few garments. In
discussing the Scythian purification ritual, Herodotus digresses to
compare cannabis to flax and tell how the Thracians (who live on
the forested edge of the steppe) make fine linen of cannabis fiber.
The Scythians did nothing comparable with the fiber, which is the
reason for the digression. The Scythians apparently cultivated no
hemp. And yet Herodotus specifies that while cannabis grew wild
on the steppe, some was cultivated.
Herodotus also reveals that the Scythians weren’t inhaling can-
nabis vapor merely for fun, even if it made them shout for joy. The
purification ritual is described quite clearly as a cleansing bath, the
only sort that Scythian men ever took. The bath involved spiritual,

WEB.indb 118 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 119

as well as physical, cleansing. Putting a deceased noble in a wagon

for a farewell tour before burial, Scythian mourners traveled to the
houses of friends and allies for banquets, during which the corpse
was served food and drink along with the living. After socializing
with the dead, though, the living needed to “purify themselves.”
Perhaps they encouraged the dead to sever their ties with the liv-
ing by similar means. Upon opening the frozen tombs, the Russian
archeologists found the tent-like structures standing with the bra-
ziers inside them. They had apparently been left smoldering when
the tombs were closed.
For normal recreation, the Scythians didn’t smoke, they drank.
Perhaps, by this time, you saw that coming. Are you astonished
to learn that the steppe nomads were enthusiastic drinkers of
alcoholic beverages, be it wine, which they did not produce them-
selves, or fermented mare’s milk, more or less their home brew?
The Scythians were known not to mix their wine with water in
the Greek fashion, and they had a taste for bingeing. Barbarians!
“Drunk as a Scythian” was an ancient Greek expression, meaning
very drunk, indeed. Successful warriors sometimes made ceremo-
nial drinking cups from the skulls of their defeated enemies.
Scythian “smoking,” in contrast, was spirit work, as was other
Scythian drug use. Persian sources indicate that some groups of
Scythians drank a psychoactive tea like Vedic soma. As a general
pattern, fermented beverages were consumed mostly for enjoy-
ment, but psychoactive beverages like Vedic soma were ritually
prescribed and controlled. To judge by the Vedic hymns to soma,
drinkers took its spirit into their bodies as a sort of worship, hoping
for joy, wisdom, well-being, even immortality.
The early history of cannabis is still an unfolding story. Another
frozen tomb along the steppe corridor was opened in 2008. This, too,
was the burial of a mounted pastoralist, south of Pazyryk and the Al-
tai Mountains, in the Gobi Desert. Today, that’s western China. The
tomb has been dated to around 700 BCE, more or less contemporary
with the frozen tombs excavated in Russia. Along with a harp (one
was also found at Pazyryk), bridles, and archery equipment, the Gobi
tomb contained almost two pounds of cannabis leaves and female
flowering tops in an excellent state of preservation, still green, in fact.

WEB.indb 119 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 120 Getting High

Specialists traveled from the United States to examine the cannabis

and announced that it appeared to be a cultivated strain. Also, the
male plants had evidently been culled. The tomb contained no smok-
ing set, but the cannabis had been lightly pounded in a wooden bowl
and placed in a leather basket, near the head of the mummy, possi-
bly his equipment for steeping and straining the cannabis to make a
psychoactive drink.
There will be more to say about forms of religion associated with
early cannabis use in the last section of this chapter. For now, let
us finish the story of how cannabis spread throughout Eurasia.
Among the principal agents of this diffusion, apparently, were
steppe people like the Scythians we have encountered in this sec-
tion. Their military superiority made them all-conquering, and
their migrations constituted the first great step in the global diffu-
sion of cannabis.

THE SILK ROAD AND BEYOND

Once the horse archers of the steppe had gained a decisive military
advantage over everyone around them, they went wherever they
chose. Generally, that wasn’t north, into the frozen coniferous for-
ests of Siberia. It was east, west, and south, which is to say, China,
Europe, and India. They carried cannabis with them, and their
diverging paths created the great divide between sativa and indica.
Observe.
The steppe is frigid, which made the south particularly appeal-
ing. But the steppe is bounded on the south by a series of barri-
ers—mountains, deserts, inland seas—making it difficult to exit
in a southerly direction. The most privileged place of north–south
transit, historically, was the space between the Aral Sea and the
Himalayas. There, thirsty travelers from the steppe could depend
on rivers that flow down from the mountains to create fertile oases
in the desert. We’ve been referring to this place as the doorstep of
Central Asia, but now we’ll be more precise, and call it the “Oxus”
region, Oxus being the ancient name of its most important river,
the Amu Darya.

WEB.indb 120 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 121

The ancient people of this region, the Sogdians, spoke an Indo-

European language and maintained close links to India and China.
The Oxus region was on the Silk Road, the axis of land communica-
tion between the major early civilizations of Eurasia. The Sogdians
preceded many of those civilizations, just as they preceded the
silk trade itself, but the Oxus was already a crossroads by 2000
BCE. Sogdian dancing girls became famous in China for a whirl-
ing dance not unlike that of later dervishes. Not far away, Haydar
supposedly “discovered” hashish when he saw a cannabis plant
swaying on a quiet day. The Oxus, most likely, is where the can-
nabis plant was first cultivated to augment its potency as a drug.
The Silk Road made it a perfect location.
Recall that a hot, dry climate encourages cannabis flowers to pro-
duce cannabinoids. The Altai region where cannabis still grows wild
is much too northerly for the cultivation of high-potency cannabis.
The more southerly Oxus region does possess such a climate, how-
ever, and so does another nearby region, the Taklamakan Desert,
also on the Silk Road. The two pounds of cannabis recently discov-
ered in a Gobi Desert tomb were probably cultivated on the edge of
the Taklamakan. Ancient commercial hubs with a hot, dry climate
would be ideal spots for the innovations that resulted in high-
potency ganja and, much later, in modern hashish (charas), the con-
centrated resin, a product even better suited to long-distance trade.
Silk-route caravans that traversed the world’s largest continent
needed products that were rare and refined, imperishable and
highly valued, neither heavy nor fragile—like silk itself. What bet-
ter item than high-grade sin semilla? With the item traveled the
know-how and, in a separate bag, the seeds. And where the trade
most especially went, by all indications, was India. Persia, too, of
course. But scorching and populous India became itself the greatest
consumer and, eventually, producer of the drug. Perhaps sin se-
milla technique was created there, then spread to the Oxus region.
That’s possible, too. But the invention of charas certainly didn’t
occur in India. Silk Road origins have seemed more likely to me
since the day I read, in the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission Report,
that 1890s India imported its charas mostly from the Oxus region
and the southern edge of the Taklamakan Desert.

WEB.indb 121 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 122 Getting High

Meanwhile, people were migrating east and west off the steppe,
along more northerly latitudes, into China and Europe, too. There
are some indications that wild cannabis had preceded them. Stud-
ies of prehistoric pollen indicate the possibility that cannabis had
spread east and west to opposite ends of Eurasia well before the
domestication of plants and animals. China and Europe would
eventually become the world’s main areas of cannabis cultiva-
tion, but their crops would remain strictly hemp, a matter of both
cultivation and climate. No sort of cannabis plant could develop
abundant cannabinoids, it seems, when planted on the shores of
the Yellow River or the Baltic Sea.
The Chinese apparently adopted hemp from the steppe pastoral-
ists who appeared on their northern border in the second millen-
nium BCE. Traces of the nomads’ arrival—the bones of horses—are
unmistakable in the Lung-shan Neolithic farming culture that was
then emerging on the alluvial plains of the Yellow River. Then,
around 1200 BCE, in the Shang Dynasty, the first of China’s long
imperial history, there’s even more unmistakable evidence of the
steppe people’s influence: a chariot burial. Archeologists have also
recovered portions of hempen cloth from a Shang-period site in the
far north. The horse archers of the northern border would play a
constant and, occasionally, a leading role in Chinese history. The
Great Wall was built and rebuilt over centuries to keep them out,
but to no avail.
The Chinese were the first to cultivate cannabis on a large scale,
and China’s hemp crop has probably always been the world’s larg-
est. Some less-than-conclusive archeological finds even predate
the arrival of the steppe dwellers. Impressions made by a woven
textile on a still-wet pottery surface have been found at sites as-
sociated with Yang-shao Neolithic farming culture, the earliest
of which there is any evidence in China. These finds could reach
back as far as 4000 BCE, and the textile in question was probably
hempen, but the imprints do not permit positive identification. In
addition, there are several even older cordage imprints that also
may have been made by cannabis, such as one on the island of
Taiwan, from a period preceding the emergence of China’s Yellow
River civilization. Perhaps these are associated with the seafaring

WEB.indb 122 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 123

ancestors of the Polynesians, who are believed to have sailed into

the Pacific from China’s southern coast in Neolithic times. If these
cordage and textile imprints are of cannabis, they represent the
earliest sign of human usage.
In contrast to India, China possesses a wealth of written evi-
dence. It shows that hemp was China’s original fiber crop. Ma,
the written Chinese character, or ideogram, that means “fiber,”
represents a couple of harvested cannabis plants hung up to dry.
Ma continued to clothe the masses even after the upper classes
took to wearing silk. Moreover, early texts indicate that canna-
bis seeds were a food source in ancient China, an unusual thing.
Hempseed is quite nutritious and not bad tasting, but it doesn’t
keep well. Therefore, it was a seasonal, peasant food. Traditional
Chinese histories, agricultural manuals, and Confucian rites—clas-
sic texts copied and recopied over millennia—are full of references
to cannabis as both a fiber and a food crop. Eventually these texts
were written on another great Chinese invention, paper, which
was originally made of hemp fibers. (When Europeans copied
papermaking from China, they too used hemp fibers at first.) The
ancient Chinese made quite a science of hemp cultivation, prizing
the female plant for its seed but preferring the male plant for its
fiber. Ancient Chinese writing had six distinct characters for (1)
cannabis in general, (2) male cannabis plants, (3) female cannabis
plants, (4) male cannabis flowers, (5) cannabis seeds, and (6) can-
nabis “fruiting clusters.”
There is some minimal indication of psychoactive cannabis in
early Chinese history. Ma has figurative meanings suggesting
psychoactive effects, for example. Ma (fiber) + tsui (drunkenness)
form a compound meaning, generically, “mind-altering drug.”
It is also significant that the ancient Chinese had a specific word
for cannabis “fruiting clusters,” the seeded, flowering tops that
the Scythians threw onto the hot rocks in their inhalation tents. A
few medical texts mention psychoactive cannabis, and logically
so, given China’s ongoing contact with the Oxus and Taklamakan
regions. The Pen-Ts’ao Ching, a pharmacopoeia written a mere two
millennia ago, but preserving lore perhaps twice that old, says
that the plant’s fruiting clusters made one “see devils,” but that,

WEB.indb 123 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 124 Getting High

over time, they facilitated communication with spirits. Later, the

famous physician T’ao Hung Ching wrote that the fruiting clusters
of cannabis were no longer much prescribed, but that “sorcerers”
combined them with ginseng “to reveal future events.” Such pre-
scriptions would have been administered, like many in Chinese
medicine, as drinks.
In contrast, alcohol and other, unidentified psychoactive sub-
stances left robust substantiation of their presence in early Shang
times. Shang emperors ruled over Bronze Age settlements in the
valley of the Yellow River, where imperial China had its begin-
nings. Shang emperors exercised their rule partly by performing
divination ceremonies. In fact, the oldest evidence of Chinese
writing is etched onto “oracle bones,” of which archeologists have
discovered thousands. Acting as high-level shamans, Shang em-
perors posed questions to their ancestor spirits, and inscribed them
on animal bones. The bones were then heated until they fractured,
with the pattern of the fractures indicating answers from the spirit
world. A fermented grog, possibly including fruiting clusters of
cannabis, may have helped induce a trance in these divination cer-
emonies. The idea is speculative, however. As for ancient China’s
recreational drug, that was unquestionably alcohol. The greatest
surviving artistic achievements of the Shang period are massive,
elaborate bronze vessels that the nobility used as punch bowls for
drinking parties.
Shamanic communication with the spirit world declined in
China, beginning with the Confucian era, well over two thousand
years ago, and the Confucian ethic, with its strong emphasis on
duty, authority, hierarchy, and tradition, seems particularly inimi-
cal to the visionary, subversive affinities of cannabis drugs. China
never developed a major tradition of drug-using religious ascetics
like Sannyasins or dervishes. In contrast, many quite respectable
Chinese did become habitual consumers of opium when it was
introduced by Arab traders in the Common Era, perhaps because
opium’s effects were more suitable to their needs. Drowsy opium
induces contentment rather than dissidence, one could say. That
idea, at any rate, has been proposed by a Chinese scholar, who
also says that sometimes, in centuries past, the older generation

WEB.indb 124 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 125

of prosperous families wanted to see the younger generation use

opium because its sedative effects would keep them out of trouble.
He adds that in the early twentieth century, the Uyghurs, an eth-
nic minority group who live in western China, grew cannabis for
exportation to India and also consumed it themselves, while their
ethnic Chinese neighbors refused to touch the stuff. Even today,
cannabis drugs have virtually no presence on China’s national
scene. Without published statistics, it’s hard to say anything more
precise. Meanwhile, China grows about 40 percent of the world’s
hemp.
Now let’s rewind our chronology to trace the much slower
emergence of the world’s other great hemp crop, that of northern
Europe. For centuries, Europeans’ main supplement for local hemp
supplies came from the shores of the Baltic Sea. Europe’s story
can be more quickly summarized than China’s, because hemp has
played a smaller role in European life.
Historical linguists have reconstructed the expansion of the Indo-
European language family as Celtic, Germanic, and Slavic tongues
swept slowly west from the steppe across northern Europe. That
hemp-bearing westward flow occurred in successive waves, be-
ginning in the third millennium BCE, leaving behind it distinctive
types of pottery from Russia to Poland to France. One type is called
“corded ware” because it is decorated by the marks of a twisted
cord that was pressed into the wet clay. Andrew Sherratt, a leading
archeologist of Neolithic Europe, suggested that the cord impres-
sions are consistent with twisted hemp rope, and that, because
corded ware is often made in the size and shape of drinking cups,
it may have contained a psychoactive cannabis drink. However,
fiber and drug crops don’t usually go together, as we know, and
the impressions cannot be conclusively identified anyway.
In Europe, other fibers competed more successfully with hemp.
Europe’s original fiber plant was flax, and Europe also possessed
more wool and fur than China. Because of its extremely long fibers,
though, hemp made the best cordage of any European plant, so
early Europeans kept a bit on hand for rope. The Celts supplied
hemp fiber or cordage to the Romans, who used it to rig their ships.
By the Viking period, Scandinavians cultivated hemp for the same

WEB.indb 125 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 126 Getting High

purpose. Later, as global exploration got under way, Europe’s

major seafaring nations all worked to ramp up their own hemp
production. In sum, it was the great expansion of European sea-
borne trade and naval competition that made hemp an important
European crop.
As for cannabis drugs, European hemp produced none. Europe
was the most northerly destination of the cannabis plant’s global
diffusion, a circumstance not conducive to cannabinoids. Unlike
the Chinese, Europeans lost touch with Central Asia during the
centuries when the southern strain was being developed as a drug
crop. Knowledge of the plant’s drug potential, and how to cultivate
it, seems not to have reached Western Europe before the nineteenth
century. Overall, compelling evidence of psychoactive cannabis
is totally absent from Europe until around 1800, when French
soldiers returned with hashish from Napoleon’s failed Egyptian
expedition.
A few titillating clues do exist. A “pipe cup” found in Bucharest
suggests at least the possibility of Scythian-style inhalation there in
the third century BCE. Then there’s the Oseberg ship burial in Nor-
way, from a thousand years later, around 850 CE. It contained a
single hempseed in a leather pouch buried with a woman who may
have been a pagan priestess. Also, there’s a 1562 recipe for an Ital-
ian witches’ brew that supposedly calls for female cannabis flow-
ers. And cannabis resin was reportedly found in a pipe excavated
from the vicinity of Shakespeare’s house in Stratford, England.
These clues are thought-provoking, certainly, but they are outliers.
An overwhelming mass of negative evidence (basically, everything
else known about European history) indicates no significant use
of psychoactive cannabis, ever, in traditional European society.
At most, the unexplained clues above indicate the possibility of
an awareness, shared by very few Europeans (the world’s most
prodigious consumers of ethanol), that cannabis might possess
psychoactive properties, or perhaps, had once possessed them.
It is interesting, though, that several of these clues point in a
familiar direction. Who may have known something, anything
at all, about the potentially psychoactive powers of cannabis in
historic Europe? A pagan priestess or a witch, two people outside

WEB.indb 126 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 127

of Europe’s dominant religion. The priestess of the Oseberg ship

burial was pre-Christian and certainly had access to religious lore
of a kind that we can loosely call “shamanic.” The witches of early
modern Europe, too, may have preserved some access to that
lore—whatever remained of Europe’s ancient shamanic religions
having become witchcraft in Christian eyes. Shamanism is the last,
which is to say, the earliest horizon in our backward survey of the
global history of marijuana. The earliest regular users of cannabis
drugs were almost certainly shamans. It is time we gave shaman-
ism a closer look.

THE EARLIEST HORIZON

Okay, so here’s the Anthropology 101 version.

Shamans are religious specialists characteristic of hunter-gath-
erer, also called foraging, societies. Before eleven or twelve thou-
sand years ago more or less all humans were foragers. Basic ele-
ments of shamanic practice have been cataloged and studied by
travelers and anthropologists over the last two centuries. They ex-
hibit an unmistakable family resemblance around the world from
the indigenous inhabitants of northern Europe and Asia, especially
Siberia, to the native people of the Americas, from Alaska right
down to Tierra del Fuego. To have spread so widely, this cultural
pattern must have crossed from Asia to the Americas during the last
ice age, before the domestication of plants and animals. Therefore,
an understanding of shamanism may help us imagine spiritual life
from the time before humans lived in villages or grew food, but
instead, foraged in family groups, frequently on the move. That
early spiritual life was almost certainly the context within which
we discovered the psychoactive properties of cannabis.
In the last half-century, various scholars have identified what
they believe to be traces of shamanism in prehistoric art. The most
persuasive single example is a twelve-thousand-year-old painting
of a half-man, half-beast (or possibly, a man wearing an owl mask,
stag horns, a lion’s skin, and a horse’s tail) discovered deep in a
French cavern, the famous “dancing sorcerer.” Another Paleolithic

WEB.indb 127 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 128 Getting High

Dancing Sorcerer, apparently a shaman.

cave painting shows a stick figure, apparently wearing a bird

mask, prostrate on the ground as if in a trance (he has an erection),
a bird-headed staff (such as shamans still use) lying beside him.
Archeologists working on more recent Neolithic sites have identi-
fied tomb decorations they believe to be shamanic in Ireland and
other parts of Europe’s Celtic fringe. These decorations are not
paintings of human and animal figures, but rather geometric pat-
terns engraved into the surface of the rock. Comparing them with
drawings by contemporary shamans, these archeologists argue
that the patterns in Neolithic tombs represent “entoptic phenom-
ena,” abstract visual patterns that shamans see in trance visions.
This “psychedelic” art flanks entrance tunnels to the tombs, per-
haps symbolizing access to the underworld.
Altered states of consciousness are basic to shamanism. Shamans
do their work in a state of trance, sometimes lying apparently un-
conscious and later reporting visions, other times, depending on

WEB.indb 128 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 129

the traditions that are infinitely variable in their details, miming

actions and speaking in voices to an audience that participates in
the ceremony. Most shamanic trances are not drug-induced, but
many are. Drugs used by shamans to induce a trance are termed
entheogens, a word meaning that they “awaken the divine within.”
All psychoactive drugs, including alcohol and tobacco, have been
employed as entheogens. Spanish drug scholar Antonio Esco-
hotado divides various substances into “possession” drugs that
are oblivion-producing sedatives (alcohol, opium) and “tripping”
drugs that produce hallucinations recalled afterward, by the trip-
per, in vivid detail. The most frequently used entheogens are hal-
lucinogens, such as peyote cactus, psilocybin mushrooms, Amanita
muscaria mushrooms, or ayahuasca vines. Cannabis is less hallu-
cinogenic than these drugs, but it is, nonetheless, one of world’s
most widespread entheogens.
Working in a state of altered consciousness distinguishes sha-
mans from other “technicians of the sacred,” like sorcerers or
priests, who often exist alongside shamans. The shaman’s func-
tion is specific and limited. Shamanic trances enable interaction
with the spirit world. In a trance, the shaman’s spirit can leave his
body and fly to the spirit realm above the normal plane of human
existence, or tunnel to the spirit realm below it. A typical shamanic
cosmology consists of a multitiered universe with several levels
above and below ground, often joined by a “world tree” whose
branches hold up the sky and whose roots give access to the un-
derworld. Shamans are often employed to guide the spirits of the
dead to their subterranean destination. They know the route, so
to speak. Recall, in this connection, those psychedelic entrances to
Neolithic tombs, and consider that the Paleolithic cave paintings
were normally quite deep underground. Such paintings could
never be viewed under normal circumstances and were clearly
magical in intent.
Shamans can consult with the omniscient spirits, who are often an-
cestors, in order to know what the future will bring and, sometimes,
to assure good fortune. (This is what the Shang emperors were
apparently doing.) Moreover, their interaction with spirits allows
shamans to heal the sick. People call a shaman when they attribute

WEB.indb 129 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 130 Getting High

illness to the intrusion of a malignant spirit or to a weakening of the

patient’s own spirit.
Hunter-gatherers are generally animists who envision a world
alive with spirits, the spirits of people, living and dead, of course,
but also the spirits of animals. Animal spirits are crucial for hunt-
ers, naturally—as prey, as rival predators whom hunters honor and
emulate, as lead players in the hunters’ cast of mythic characters.
The shaman’s chief allied spirits usually appear as animals. Like
flying, changing into an animal is a frequent scenario of shamanic
trance. Animal masks and disguises, as well as animal teeth, bones,
and feathers are standard shamanic attire. In a trance, shamans
may don the attire to “become” the animal. Shamans know the
spirits of places, such as mountains and rivers, and also of plants.
Shamans who consume an entheogenic plant are taking its spirit
into their bodies. They often speak directly to the plant spirit and
entreat its aid, as do the Vedic hymns to soma.
An entheogen is never “recreational.” The shaman’s spiritual
work is just that, work. It is often ecstatic—which is to say, involv-
ing an “out-of-body” experience—but it has nothing to do with eu-
phoria. A man or woman receives the calling to become a shaman.
The aspirant then undergoes a period of apprenticeship, learning
spirit lore from a master. Often, a crucial part of this training is
the collection, preparation, and ritual consumption of entheogens.
Shamanic knowledge of entheogens is usually secret. They are, by
definition, not for everyone, at least most of the time. Some sha-
mans supervise initiation rituals by which boys and girls become
adult members of hunter-gatherer societies, and the ritual is often
an ordeal during which the initiates consume entheogens. Usually,
however, the entheogens are for the shaman alone. They are a tool
of the trade.
A shaman uses entheogens to see what others can’t. Consider
the difference between shamans and priests, who are character-
istic of later, larger, agricultural societies in global history. Priests
are above all keepers of detailed, arcane knowledge, inscribed in
sacred texts or memorized verbatim. When priests enact the ritu-
als as prescribed, they deploy a spiritual power that inheres in the
rituals themselves. The efficacy of the Catholic Mass, for example,

WEB.indb 130 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Asian Origins 131

depends not at all on the personal qualities of the priest who of-
ficiates. The priest’s script, so to speak, is everything, his personal
ability, nothing. In contrast, personal ability is crucial for a shaman,
whose arcane knowledge consists mostly in a set of techniques
enabling him to operate within the spirit world. Shamans’ inter-
ventions may be somewhat scripted, but they necessarily involve
improvisation. In sum, priests may sense a spiritual presence, but
their work does not depend on it, while shamans must sense a spir-
itual presence and interact with it. Their success depends largely
on imagination and creativity.
The world’s best-known shaman ever is probably the one de-
picted by Carlos Castañeda in The Teachings of Don Juan: A Ya-
qui Way of Knowledge (1968), a published version of the author’s
doctoral dissertation in anthropology. The book made a stir and
spawned best-selling sequels. The field research has been chal-
lenged, but the representation of shamanic training is highly
informed and provides an excellent illustration. Don Juan, an
ordinary looking, elderly Mexican of indigenous descent, is a
man of few words. He explains virtually nothing about the spirit
world. Instead, he gives Castañeda precise instructions on how to
prepare and ingest three entheogens—peyote, datura, and psilo-
cybin mushrooms—each of which is understood as a spirit and,
potentially, an “ally.” To make friends with a potential ally, the
author is instructed to dance in front of the plant on successive
days. Eventually, he ingests the entheogens one by one, on sepa-
rate occasions, to audition with their spirits, so to speak. Different
shamans find different allies, a matter of personal affinities. Casta-
ñeda’s experiences vary from baffling to terrifying, the furthest
thing imaginable from “recreational.” The teachings of Don Juan
are, in essence, a set of supervised, drug-induced trances, training
for a would-be visionary. The spiritual insights acquired by the
apprentice come not from the teacher’s words but from direct,
personal experience.
In sum, entheogens are used as part of a spiritual quest, and
cannabis is among the world’s most frequent entheogens. Physical
evidence of cannabis drugs before around 700 BCE is limited and
questionable, but whenever and however it took place, the first

WEB.indb 131 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 132 Getting High

regular use of cannabis to alter consciousness probably occurred in

a shamanic context. That knowledge creates a meaningful chrono-
logical starting place for the narrative of marijuana’s global history,
and consequently, a fitting conclusion for our backward explora-
tion of it.

WEB.indb 132 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 6

Epiphanies

H istories of cannabis commonly invoke its great antiquity as a

domesticated plant, and its antiquity cannot be doubted. Just
as commonly, though, one finds a mistaken impression of how the
plant was being used during several millennia. Psychoactive can-
nabis figures in global history mostly as an entheogen, employed
less for its euphoriant properties than for its visionary epiphanies.
The widespread use of marijuana as a recreational drug is rare
and recent in world history. To be sure, the use of cannabis drugs is
at least three thousand years old, and probably older. During most
of that time, however, it has belonged especially to shamans and,
then, to mystical ascetics who hungered for direct, personal access
to divinity. Hindu and Muslim civilizations are the two main con-
texts in which cannabis drugs appear during the last millennium,
and ascetic holy men were their most typical users in each case.
Recreational use, which draws on marijuana’s euphoriant quali-
ties rather than its hallucinogenic qualities, has been strikingly less
important in global history. The seasonal bhang-drinking tradition
of northern India aside, there is no evidence that cannabis has re-
placed alcohol as the general recreational euphoriant in any major
world society, ever.
Where cannabis has been used recreationally, it has been as a poor
man’s drug, a more affordable substitute for ethanol, often adopted

133

WEB.indb 133 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 134 Getting High

by people who are socially and ethnically marginalized. That was

true, apparently, south of the Congo River, in the wake of the slave
trade, and true also throughout Latin America, which has had, over-
all, less experience with psychoactive cannabis than has the United
States. Migrating workers carried marijuana around the Western
Hemisphere in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In
the United States, the 1960s counterculture changed the social profile
of marijuana as millions of middle-class young people adopted it,
and the prestige of the U.S. example inspired international imitation.
Today’s high prices appear all the more unprecedented when one
thinks that, consistently for the previous several thousand years until
only a few decades ago, the main users of cannabis drugs have been
the poor, most notably wandering holy men who lived by begging.
The privileged place of alcohol turns out to be absolutely stan-
dard in global history. No other single discovery of this investi-
gation impressed me more. In global perspective, cannabis and
alcoholic beverages have hugely asymmetrical profiles. Ethanol is
food, full of calories, whether we want them or not. It is consumed
avidly by birds that find it in fermented berries. Fermentation is
a natural food preservative. Myriad forms of wine and beer are
produced from the earliest domesticated plants and have been a
regular part of the human diet around the world since the inven-
tion of agriculture. The volume of alcohol consumption has varied
radically from place to place. Anyone short on food is unlikely to
make much ethanol. Various religious strictures have limited it.
However, most human societies have used alcohol to some degree.
Europe has made and consumed ethanol with special intensity,
and European colonialism has intensified consumption in the rest
of the world. If drug traffic is the transport and sale of mind-alter-
ing substances, then the most trafficked drug in history has always
been ethanol.
By comparison, marijuana is a recreational Johnny-come-lately
whose adoption by middle-class people made it the world’s most
used illegal drug only in the late twentieth century. The United
States (with an annual prevalence around 13 percent) is now the
world capital of marijuana cultivation and use, followed by other
developed countries. Various European countries (Spain, Portu-

WEB.indb 134 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Epiphanies 135

gal) have recently liberalized their drug laws, others (Sweden,

France, the UK) have not, and some (the Netherlands) have made
laws more restrictive. The famous hashish cafés of Amsterdam
have closed their doors to tourists. Meanwhile, Latin American
countries are beginning to legalize or decriminalize marijuana in
self-defense against the criminal traffic and its attendant mayhem,
but only Jamaica consumes at U.S. levels. Most parts of the world
where marijuana (in hashish and other forms) has been consumed
for many centuries now use less. South Asia consumes at only a
fraction of U.S. levels, even though marijuana continues to play a
role in religious observance in several countries, including India.
Estimates for Africa vary, but even the high guesses do not exceed
U.S. levels. In Thailand, once famous for its marijuana, stylish
young people have switched to methamphetamine. In burgeoning
China, where cannabis was first intensively cultivated, marijuana
use is close to unknown. The highlight of a recent marijuana-
oriented tour of the world outside of North America and Western
Europe was Australia, where the small New South Wales town of
Nimbin hosts an annual “Mardi Grass” festival.
Cannabis drugs have never been for everybody. Instead, they
have consistently been used by people seeking meditative insights,
a stimulus to creativity, direct access to the spirit world, or the
experience of transcending earthly cares to enter a mystical union
with God and the cosmos. This last phenomenon, called the “uni-
tive experience,” is among the most esteemed and ecstatic in the
world. This what those hashish-eating Sufis and ganja-smoking
Sannyasins were after, an experience prized by our greatest proph-
ets and religious teachers, typically a pivotal moment in any life.
Yet those who seek it are a small minority in any society.
How hallucinogenic drugs like marijuana might contribute to
spiritual insights remains a mystery. Very little scientific study of
them has been done since the 1960s. That study has recommenced,
however, and just as was true in the 1960s, subjects exposed to
powerful psychedelic drugs in controlled trials still report profound
experiences with a lasting effect. Moreover, new tools are provid-
ing a different view of the phenomenon. Digital imaging that traces
blood flow in the brain, for example, shows that hallucinogens

WEB.indb 135 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 136 Getting High

(psilocybin, at least) reduce activity in parts of the brain that neu-

roscientists term “the default-mode network.” Intriguingly, some
believe the default-mode network to be the physical, neurological
home of the self or ego. Its reduced activity would therefore imply
diminished feelings of self or ego, which precisely describes the
unitive experience.
Allen Ginsberg would certainly not be surprised to learn, had he
lived to see this new focus of neuroscience, that the brains of people
on psychedelic drugs operate less in something called “default
mode.” Suppression of default mode sounds very much like his
description of the way marijuana affected his thinking. Many other
writers, musicians, artists, and generally creative people believe
that marijuana stimulates their creativity in a similar manner, con-
tributing to what nonartists might call “thinking outside the box.”
The brain’s default-mode network has also been compared to an
orchestra conductor. Suppress the brain’s conductor, it seems, and
you unleash powers of improvisation and . . . start to get jazz. This
kind of creativity, rather than a concerted effort, is a release. The
power to create seems to come out of nowhere and is often believed
to be a spiritual gift. “Inhaling a divine breath” is the ancient, root
meaning of inspiration, the gift of the muse. Inspired ideas seem to
appear all at once, fully formed in consciousness, like epiphanies.
And there’s the rub. Not everyone relishes creative and philo-
sophical epiphanies. They are often lonely experiences, and un-
shared epiphanies can be disconcerting for all concerned. Religious
epiphanies may be taken for divine revelations, and the major
world religions, mainly based on past revelations recorded in
scripture, look askance on claims of divine revelation in the pres-
ent. Christianity and Islam, with their emphasis on liturgical au-
thority, mostly reject entheogens. From a mainstream Christian or
Muslim perspective, the time for prophetic visions is over. Entheo-
gens somehow represent “the competition,” sometimes the devil.
In the United States today this critique is not made in religious
terms and is, perhaps, not even self-conscious. Moreover, marijua-
na’s euphoriant qualities, the basis of its recreational appeal, worry
many religious people, because the euphoria seems unearned and,
therefore, immoral. The objection that medical marijuana users will

WEB.indb 136 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Epiphanies 137

feel better partly because they are high is essentially moralistic. It

accompanies the worry that marijuana users are disrespecting tra-
ditional models. All these feelings have deep historical roots.
Those who worry about marijuana need not be so fearful, how-
ever. Marijuana is unlikely to replace, or even rival, alcohol as
our recreational drug of choice. It is not for everybody. For most
people, its euphoriant effect is less than alcohol’s. It is most likely
to be used by the poor, by the marginal, by the chronically ill,
by the artistically and philosophically and spiritually inclined,
by seekers after the meaning of life, and by social and religious
nonconformists of various stripes. That, at least, is the picture that
emerges from this short global history. Marijuana, it seems, is a
mind-expanding drug after all.

WEB.indb 137 10/7/15 10:24 AM

WEB.indb 138 10/7/15 10:24 AM
 Glossary

Cannabis has had many forms in global history. Therefore this

book requires many specific historical names, but it employs mari-
juana as the most general term.

bhang—Indian name for cannabis plant and a traditional, mildly

psychoactive drink
bud—fully mature, resin-laden flowers of the female plant
cannabis—Indo-European genus name covering all forms of the
plant, first recorded by Herodotus
Cannabis sativa—scientific name given by Linnaeus to a domes-
tic Swedish specimen (1753)
Cannabis indica—scientific name given by Lamarck to an Indian
specimen (1783)
Cannabis ruderalis—scientific name given by Janischewski to a
Central Asian specimen (1924)
cannabinoids—molecules peculiar to resin of female cannabis
flowers
endocannabinoids—human hormones resembling cannabinoids
endocannabinoid system—human physiological system regu-
lated by cannabinoids and endocannabinoids
charas—Indian name of concentrated resin, similar to modern
hashish

139

WEB.indb 139 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 140 Glossary

dagga—cannabis smoked in early South Africa

diamba—main Brazilian term for the drug in the early 1900s, an
African word
fumo de Angola—roughly, Angola tobacco (Brazil, ca. 1900)
fumo de caboclo—roughly, Indian tobacco (Brazil, ca. 1900)
ganja—Indian term, imported to Jamaica in the 1800s, for sin se-
milla
“the green one”—medieval Arabic slang for hashish, contrasts with
“the red one” (wine)
grifo—ca. 1920 Mexican slang for marijuana or marijuana cigarette
hashish—in medieval Arabic, equivalent of ganja; today, concen-
trated resin rich in cannabinoids, equivalent of charas
hashishi (singular), hashishiyya or hashishin (plural)—medieval
Arabic for “hashish eater(s),” a common slur, rendered “ash-
ishin” by Marco Polo
hemp—Cannabis sativa that is not marijuana and is lacking in can-
nabinoids
maconha—principal name of Brazilian marijuana today
marijuana—psychoactive cannabis originating in Mexico
medical marijuana—modern sin semilla, sold at dispensaries,
often an indica-sativa hybrid
recreational marijuana—same as the above, different application
marihuana—original Spanish-language form of the word
María Juana—slang verbal “disguise” for marijuana
marimba—Colombian term for Cannabis indica, imported into—
then exported from—Colombia’s Caribbean coast
pipiltzintzintlis—apparently, an Indigenous Mexican word ap-
plied to psychoactive cannabis in the 1700s
reefer (probably from grifo)—mid-1900s United States, originally
African American
riamba—Central African word for psychoactive cannabis, appar-
ently derived from bhang
Beni Riamba Brotherhood—tribal society that attempted to
settle conflicts by smoking riamba
Rosa María—in 1800s Mexico, a verbal disguise for marijuana
sin semilla—fully mature buds, never pollinated, for maximum
drug potency; from Spanish, “without seeds”

WEB.indb 140 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Sources and Asides

As I’ve observed often in the preceding pages, the sources for a

global history of marijuana are limited. This appendix offers notes
on the most interesting and important ones available in English. It
also includes asides on a few topics that may be of interest.

GETTING HIGH

I recommend several general histories of marijuana that provide an

abundance of detail, especially regarding recent developments in
the United States: Martin A. Lee, Smoke Signals: A Social History of
Marijuana—Medical, Recreational, and Scientific (New York: Scribner,
2012); and Martin Booth, Cannabis: A History (New York: St. Mar-
tin’s, 2003), which also covers the United Kingdom. Chris Duvall
concentrates more on the global picture in Cannabis (London: Reak-
tion, 2015).

AMERICAN CENTURY

The last century of the story is by far the best known, and my
telling of it is conventional. The indispensable study for the early
twentieth-century is Richard J. Bonnie and Charles H. Whitebread,
141

WEB.indb 141 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 142 Sources and Asides

The Marihuana Conviction: A History of Marijuana Prohibition in the

United States (New York: Lindesmith Center, 1999). Those inter-
ested in jazz vipers should take a look at the memoir of Milton
Mezzrow and Bernard Wolfe, Really the Blues (New York: Random
House, 1946).
Some readers may have heard the argument that the 1937 Mari-
huana Tax Act resulted from a conspiracy joining Hearst interests
(timber) and DuPont interests (synthetic fiber products) to outlaw
competition from hemp. The case is plausible, but strictly circum-
stantial. It derives from an extraordinary book by Jack Herer, a
leading spirit of the pro-hemp movement that began in the 1990s.
Herer’s self-published The Emperor Wears No Clothes (10th ed., 1995)
is a remarkable phenomenon worthy of a look by any aficionado.
Much of the book is a mass of photocopied primary sources, some
almost in microform.
The La Guardia Report was published as Mayor’s Committee
on Marihuana, The Marihuana Problem in the City of New York (New
York: Jacques Cattell, 1944).

ATLANTIC WORLD

David T. Courtwright provides a vigorous overview of the com-

mercial globalization of drugs, encompassing not only distilled
spirits but also tea, coffee, tobacco, and opium. Courtwright’s eco-
nomically driven model has less to say about marijuana, which did
not become a commodity in international trade until much more
recently. Still, Courtwright’s concise and wide-ranging Forces of
Habit: Drugs and the Making of the Modern World (Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press, 2001) provides an ideal overview for
readers interested in the global history of drugs.
Marijuana’s early history in Latin America has long been the
least understood portion of its global itinerary. Isaac Campos,
Home Grown: Marijuana and the Origin of Mexico’s War on Drugs
(Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2012) has be-
gun to change that. Campos is my main source on Mexico, and I
consider his book to be the best recent academic monograph on
any aspect of marijuana history. Also de rigueur is the classic col-

WEB.indb 142 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Sources and Asides 143

lection edited by Vera Rubin, Cannabis and Culture (The Hague:

Mouton, 1975), with a number of chapters on Latin America.
Though not in English, the essential source for Brazil is the com-
pendium published as Ministério da Saúde, Maconha: Coletânea
de trabalhos brasileiros (Rio de Janeiro: Serviço Nacional de Edu-
cação Sanitária, 1958). Finally, two studies of Colombia deserve
mention: Lina Britto Londoño, “Contrabandistas, marimberos, y
parranderos: Breve historia oral de la bonanza de la marihuana
en la Guajira, 1970’s,” MA thesis, Department of Anthropology,
Universidad de la Cordillera, La Paz, Bolivia, 2009; and Eduardo
Sáenz Rovner, “La Prehistoria de la marihuana en Colombia:
Consumo y cultivos entre los años 30 y 60,” Cuadernos de Economía
26, no. 47 (2007): 205–22.
On Africa, see Chris Duvall, Cannabis, cited above, and Brian M.
Du Toit, Cannabis in Africa: A Survey of Its Distribution in Africa and
a Study of Cannabis Use and Users in Multi-Ethnic South Africa (Rot-
terdam: A. A. Balkema, 1980). The intriguing source on the Beni
Riamba Brotherhood is Hermann von Wissman, My Second Journey
through Equatorial Africa from the Congo to the Zambesi, in the Years
1886 and 1887 (London: Chatto & Windus, 1891).

MEDIEVAL HASHISH

Though difficult to absorb, abundant evidence from medieval

manuscript sources in Arabic is marshaled authoritatively by the
work of the distinguished Yale professor Franz Rosenthal, The
Herb: Hashish versus Medieval Muslim Society (Leiden: E. J. Brill,
1971). This chapter is based primarily on that evidence along with
an overall understanding of the medieval Muslim world. Another
study crucial to my account is Ahmet T. Karamustafa, God’s Un-
ruly Friends: Dervish Groups in the Islamic Later Middle Period (Salt
Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1994). Aficionados will also
find much to savor in Hakim Bey and Abel Zug, Orgies of the Hemp
Eaters: Cuisine, Slang, Literature, & Ritual of Cannabis Culture (New
York: Autonomedia, 2004), a fabulous compendium of excerpts,
essays, annotated bibliography, and primary sources on cannabis
history in South Asia and the Muslim World. Passing references to

WEB.indb 143 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 144 Sources and Asides

hashish occur frequently in One Thousand and One Nights, but the
drug is more or less central to three stories in particular: “The Tale
of the Hashish Eater,” “The Tale of the Two Hashish Eaters,” and
“The Tale of the Second Captain of Police.” A variety of other tales
have been collected by Andrew C. Kimmens, Hashish Tales (New
York: Morrow, 1975).
See Booth, Cannabis, for a much fuller discussion of hashish ex-
perimenters in nineteenth-century Europe and the United States,
including (on page 86) the quotation from Théophile Gautier,
the creator of the Parisian Hashish Eaters Club. The writings of
nineteenth-century European and U.S. experimenters make inter-
esting reading without contributing much to the global history of
marijuana. Fitz Hugh Ludlow’s account has been reprinted as The
Hasheesh Eater: Being Passages from the Life of a Pythagorean (New
Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2006).
The history of modern hashish, the concentrated resin, is not
covered by the present book, except for speculations in chapter
5 about its possible origins along the Silk Road. Its major export-
ers have been Lebanon, Morocco, Afghanistan, and Nepal. Egypt
has been an important consuming country. Also not covered here
is Moroccan kif, which is a mixture of chopped cannabis and to-
bacco. See Laurence Cherniak, The Great Books of Hashish (Berke-
ley, CA: And/Or Press, 1979).

ASIAN ORIGINS

The indispensable primary source for India has been reprinted

as Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, 1893–1894 (Silver
Spring, MD: Jefferson, 1969), which provides the findings in one
volume. An excellent account of the use of ganja by Indian sadhus
(sannyasins) appears in Patricia Morningstar, “Thandai and Chi-
lam: Traditional Hindu Beliefs about the Proper Uses of Cannabis,”
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 17, no. 3 (1985): 141–65, reprinted in
Bey and Zug, Orgies. Also see Khwaja A. Hasan, “Social Aspects
of Cannabis Use in India,” in Rubin, Cannabis and Culture, 235–45.
Soma, the ritual drink of the Vedic priestly caste, was basically a
tea made of plants (especially one called soma) that were pulver-

WEB.indb 144 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Sources and Asides 145

ized, steeped, and strained, as for the bhang drink. The soma plant
itself has not been positively identified. In addition, “owing to the
difficulty of obtaining the actual soma plant, several substitutes
were used,” and there were at least five possible admixtures that
cannot be positively identified, either. The bhang plant was recog-
nized as belonging to the “family” of soma and may have figured
occasionally as one of its active ingredients. See Parati Ghosal, Life-
style of the Vedic People (New Delhi: DKPrintworld, 2006).
The early prehistory of marijuana is still emerging and must be
pieced together from scattered sources. See Duvall, Cannabis. The
Herodotus quotation is from the classic 1910 History of Herodotus,
translated by George Rawlinson, with a few modifications for
the sake of clarity. (Rawlinson translated the word cannabis as
“hemp,” for example.) Duvall doubts that the famous account by
Herodotus involved psychoactive cannabis, but the archeologist
who unearthed the equipment described by the Greek historian
had no doubts in the matter. See Sergei I. Rudenko, Frozen Tombs of
Siberia: The Pazyryk Burials of Iron Age Horsemen (London: J. M. Dent
and Sons, 1970; first published in Russian, 1953). The leading late-
twentieth-century archeologist of prehistoric drug use agreed with
Rudenko. See Andrew Sherratt, “Sacred and Profane Substances:
The Ritual Use of Narcotics in Later Neolithic Europe,” in Economy
and Society in Prehistoric Europe: Changing Perspectives (Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997), 403–30. David Lewis-Wil-
liams and David Pearce explore the prehistory of religion in Inside
the Neolithic Mind: Consciousness, Cosmos, and the Realm of the Gods
(London: Thames and Hudson, 2005).

EPIPHANIES

The long-term perspective, by which pagan “visionary drugs” be-

come associated with witchcraft and the devil, is traced by Antonio
Escohotado in A Brief History of Drugs: From the Stone Age to the
Stoned Age (Rochester, VT: Park Street, 1999). Readers of Spanish
should prefer Escohotado’s three-volume original version, Historia
general de las drogas (Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1989), which con-
tains many more examples.

WEB.indb 145 10/7/15 10:24 AM

WEB.indb 146 10/7/15 10:24 AM
 Index

Note: Italicized page references indicate illustrations.

Abdals, 93 in India, 106–7; in Mexican

addiction, 6–7, 9–10, 81 history, 51, 55, 56, 57; Muslim
Afghanistan, 77 consumption, 79–80, 83, 84;
Africa: alcohol consumption, overview, 1–4, 134; religion
70–71, 72; hemp cultivation and and, 79–80, 107; in Scythian
usage, 48; marijuana history, history, 119; in U.S. history, 11,
70–75, 73, 134; slavery and 17, 18–19, 22, 24–25, 50. See also
marijuana dissemination, 48, 50, beer
54, 64–67, 69, 70, 74 Alcott, Louisa May, 101
African Americans, 17–18, 21, ale, 79–80. See also beer
22–23, 27 Alpert, Richard, 34
African slaves, 48, 50, 54, 64–67, Altamont Free Concert, 36–37
69, 70, 74 Alzate y Ramírez, José Antonio, 52
aguardiente, 61 Amanita muscaria mushrooms, 129
AIDS, 3, 7 Amazonian Indians, 68
alakh, 111–12 Amazons, 116
alcohol: in African history, 70–71, amotivational syndrome, 4, 10, 11
72; in Brazilian history, 66, Anslinger, Harry, 4, 26–27, 28, 58,
72, 74; in Chinese history, 94
124; in Colombian history, appetite stimulation, 3
61; European distillation Armstrong, Louis, 5, 23
and popularity of, 48–50, artists, 5, 101, 136. See also music
79–80; health risks of, 10, 39; asceticism, 89, 90, 110–12

147

WEB.indb 147 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 148 Index

Assassins (ashishin), 4, 77, 94–99 Cannabis sativa. See hashish; hemp;

assemblies, 69 marijuana
Atharva Veda, 105 cannabis seeds, 53, 116–18, 117,
Atlantic Monthly magazine, 5, 35, 123
101, 103–4 canvas (word origin), 46
Australia, 135 Caribbean, 50, 59, 61–64
autumnal equinox, 13–14 cartels, 8, 41, 60–61
ayahuasca, 68, 129 Castañeda, Carlos, 131
Aztecs, 51 Catholic Church, 51, 53, 55, 131
cave paintings, 127–28, 128, 129
Balzac, Honoré de, 101 CBD (cannabidiol), 3
banj, 83 Celts, 125, 128
Bashilange, 74–75 Centennial Exposition, 101–2
Baudelaire, Charles, 101 Central America, 8, 41, 59
Beat generation, beatniks, 29–31 Central Asia, 86–87, 88, 93, 113–20,
beer: African consumption, 117
70–71; associations, 1; cost charas, 105, 109, 112, 121
comparisons, 8; health Chepito Marihuano, 56
associations, 39; in medieval Chile, 58
Europe, 79–80 chillum, 62, 109, 111
Bengal ganja, 109 China, 3, 14, 16, 101, 122–25, 135
Beni Riamba, 74–75, 76 Christianity: alcohol consumption
bhang, 72, 73, 104, 105–6, 108, and, 79; drug restrictions, 51, 53,
112 55; priest’s roles, 131; religious
Bible, 62, 79 epiphanies, 136; society reform
Brahmins, 107 and morality issues, 18–19. See
brandy, 48–49 also Rastafarians
Brazil, 52, 64–70 CIA (Central Intelligence Agency),
Bucharest “pipe cup,” 126 34
Buddhism, 36, 107, 110 cigarettes, 51, 54, 69, 75
burial customs, 104, 116–19, 117, civil rights movement, 31, 37
122, 126–27 clothing, 47, 116, 118, 123
cocaine, 9–10, 19, 40, 41, 60
cachaça, 66, 72, 74 coca leaves, 24
California, 7, 8, 40–41 Colombia, 8, 41, 58–61
caliphs, 96 Colorado, 7
Canada, 7, 12 Compassionate Use Act, 7, 40–41
cannabinoids, 3–4, 11, 12–14, 78, consciousness, altered states of,
105 128–29
Cannabis indica, 5, 14–15, 16, 54, Controlled Substance Act, 6–7
59, 64 cooking cannabis, 78
cannabis plants, 12–16, 15 countercultures: American/
Cannabis ruderalis, 15 international, 28–37, 38–39, 42,

WEB.indb 148 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Index 149

60, 70–71, 76; Muslim religious Escobar, Pablo, 60, 61

dissenters, 84, 85, 87–94, 95–100 Escohotado, Antonio, 129
The Count of Monte Cristo (Dumas), esrar, 86
101 ethanol, 48, 51, 70, 71, 134. See also
creativity, 5, 101, 136 alcohol; beer
criminality, associations with, 4, euphoriants, 2, 10, 136–37
16, 25, 27, 28 Eurasian steppes, 86–87, 88, 93,
“La Cucaracha” (song), 20 112–20, 117
Europe: alcohol production and
dagga, 71, 72, 73, 74 consumption, 48–50, 79–80;
dancing sorcerer, 127, 128 drug laws, modern, 134–35;
datura, 72, 131 hashish history, 100–101; hemp
decriminalization, 7, 9, 135 cultivation and production, 12, 14,
deprogramming, 33–34 46–48, 104, 123, 125–26; marijuana
dervishes, 89–92, 90, 93, 100, 110 history, 73–74, 104, 126–27
devil weed, 4, 42, 55, 56, 59
diamba, 66, 72 fakirs, 110
Díaz, Porfirio, 55 Farsi (language), 113
dispensaries, 7, 8–9 Fatimid dynasty, 97
distillation, 48–49 Federal Bureau of Investigation
divination ceremonies, 124 (FBI), 6
Don Juan, 131 Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN),
drinks, cannabis-based: Chinese, 23, 26–27, 28
124; Eurasian steppe, 105, 108, flappers, 22
115, 119, 120, 130; Indian, 104, France, 46, 55, 100–101, 126, 135
105–6, 108, 112; Jamaican, 62; Freyre, Gilberto, 66
Neolithic European pottery for, fumo de Angola, 66, 68
125 fumo de caboclo, 68
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA),
7 ganja, 5, 59, 61–64, 103–4, 105, 106,
drug-testing programs, 6 109–12
drunkenness, 1, 3, 39, 79 Ganja Mahal, 109
Dumas, Alexandre, 101 Garvey, Marcus, 62–63
Durga Puja, 108, 112 gateway drugs, 9, 10–11
Gay Liberation movement, 37
Ecstasy, 40 gender, and consumption
Elizabeth I, Queen of England, demographics, 21, 22, 29, 108,
46–47 109–10
endocannabinoid system, 4, 6 Genghis Khan, 87
England, 46–47, 50, 79, 101, 104, Germany, 48, 49
126, 135 gin, 50
entheogens, 129, 130–33, 136 Ginsberg, Allen, 5, 30, 34, 35,
ephedra, 115 103–4, 136

WEB.indb 149 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 150 Index

The Grateful Dead, 36 consumption, modern, 100; U.S.

“The Great Marijuana Hoax” history, 101–2
(Ginsberg), 5, 103–4 hashish eater (hashishiyya), 94–99
Greeks, ancient, 107 The Hasheesh Eater (book), 101
“the green one,” 80, 82 Hashish Eaters’ Club (Paris), 101
Guyana, 59 Hashish Parlor, 102
Haydar, Qutb al-Din, 89, 98, 121
hadiths, 79, 80 Haydaris, 84, 89, 90–92, 100
Haight-Ashbury, San Francisco, 32 head shops, 38
Haile Selassie, Emperor of hemp (Cannabis sativa): Brazilian
Ethiopia, 63 history and cultivation, 67;
hallucinogens: counterculture Chilean cultivation, 58; Chinese
popularity of, 33–36; hashish cultivation and production,
effects, descriptions, 101; as 122–23; European cultivation
marijuana classification, 3, and production, 12, 46–47, 125;
5; Mexican use of, 51, 52–53; fabrics, 47, 116, 118, 123; false
religions condemning, 51; for incrimination of, 11; genetic
shamanic rituals, 124, 127–33, comparisons to marijuana,
128; for spiritual insights, 14; hempseeds and oil, 2, 3,
135–36 12, 52, 54, 123, 126; legislative
Harper’s Magazine, 102 restrictions on, 27–28; marijuana
Harrison Act, 19 cultivation compared to, 13;
hashish, medieval: Assassin medicinal use and effects
legend associations and slur of, 4–5; Mexican history and
origins, 94–99; associations, cultivation, 51–52; plant
81, 86–87, 93–94; consumption descriptions, 12–13; prehistoric
demographics, 81, 84, 99–100; history, 118; production
consumption locations, 83–84; methods, 47; products and
consumption methods, 78, 83, applications, 12, 42, 47; U.S.
85, 89, 94, 100, 101; cost, 84; cultivation, 11–12, 28, 47–48
cultivation of, 83; definition, “Hemp for Victory” (federal
77; discovery legends, 89, 90, program), 12
121; production locations and The Herb (Rosenthal), 81
methods, 77–78; religion and, herbolarias, 52, 56, 57
80–81, 89, 91–94; side effects Herodotus, 113, 115–17
and expectations, 77, 84–85, heroin, 9, 10, 19
85; slurs, 94–99; terminology Hinduism, 103–4, 105, 107, 110–12,
and slang for, 80, 83; written 111, 113
documentation, 80–83 hippies, 4, 32–37, 38
hashish, modern: associations, 101, “homegrown,” 6, 41
102; European dissemination homosexuality, 81, 84, 85
and popularity, 100–101; in hookahs, 78
India, 105, 109, 112, 121; Muslim horse archers, 86, 115

WEB.indb 150 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Index 151

Hugo, Victor, 101 Kerouac, Jack, 30

“Human Be-In” (event), 35 Kesey, Ken, 34, 35
Khayyam, Omar, 101
Ibn Battuta, 73 Khoisan people, 72, 74
Ibn Tammiyyah, 93 King, Martin Luther, Jr., 31, 37
ice cream, hashish-laced, 105
imams, 96–97 LaGuardia, Fiorello, 28
immigrants, 17–18, 20, 21, 24, 25 Lamarck, 14–15
imperialism, 18 law enforcement corruption, 6
India: alcohol consumption, Leary, Timothy, 34, 35
106–7; British colonization Lebanon, 77, 144
and cannabis taxation, 104, legalization of marijuana:
109; cannabis-based drinks of, arguments against, 4, 6–7,
104, 105–6, 108, 112; cannabis 9–11, 18–19, 25; arguments
origins, 103, 113; hashish supporting, 6–12, 21, 28,
(charas) history, 105, 112, 121; 41; early campaigns for, 38;
marijuana (ganja) history, 61, European, 134–35; legislation, 4,
64, 72, 103–5, 109–12, 121, 135 11, 21, 25–28; public opinion, 8
Indian Hemp Drugs Commission linguistics, historical, 113–14
Report, 104–5, 107–12 Linnaeus, Carl, 14
Inés de la Cruz, Sor Juana, 52 literary references, 101–2
ingestion: cannabinoid activation LSD, 33–34
methods for, 78; of hashish, 78,
83, 85, 89, 94, 100, 101, 105; of ma, 123
hempseeds, 123; of marijuana maconha, 64–70
(pipiltzintzintlis), 52, 54, 76 mamluks, 86–87
Islam: alcohol consumption Manson family, 37
restrictions, 79–80, 107; Marhiuana Tax Act, 27–28, 58
hashish and, 80, 82, 86, 87, 89; María Juana, 16, 51
leadership claims and conflicts, María Santísima, 51
96; religious dissenters, marihuanos, 21
87, 88–94, 95–99; religious marijuana (psychoactive
epiphanies, 136. See also cannabis, Cannabis sativa),
Muslims overview: active ingredients,
Italy, 126 4; alcohol comparisons, 1–3;
associations and culture of, 1;
Jamaica, 5, 8, 41, 59, 61–64, 135 benefits of, 1–3, 5, 10; cannabis
jazz, 22–23, 27, 29 plant descriptions and crop
Jesus, 79 cultivation, 12–14; classifications
Jones, William, 113 and pharmacological properties,
2, 3, 5, 9, 129, 136; consumption
Kama Sutra, 29, 107 demographics, 76, 133–34, 137;
Kennedy, Robert, 37 cost of, 8; criticism of, modern,

WEB.indb 151 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 152 Index

136–37; effects of, 2, 3, 4–5, 10, morphine, 10, 19

123–24; health consequences, 10; muggles, 23
hemp compared to, 11–12, 13, Muhammad (prophet), 79, 80, 88,
14; medicinal properties, 3–4; 96
nicknames for, 1, 5, 16, 22, 23, mushrooms (psilocybin), 33, 52,
51, 73; usage purpose, 2–3, 5, 53, 129, 131, 136
135; word origins, 16, 50–51. See music, 5, 22–23, 29, 36, 63, 92
also legalization of marijuana; Muslims: alcohol consumption,
medicinal usage; related topics 79–80, 84, 107; Assassin
marimba, 59–61 associations, 4, 77, 94–99;
Marley, Bob, 63 hashish consumption, modern,
Maximilian, Emperor of Mexico, 100; Indian marijuana use,
55 109; maritime trade, 72;
medicinal usage: Chinese, religious branches and orders,
early, 3, 123–24; early U.S. 87–92, 95–99. See also hashish,
pharmaceuticals, 3, 26, 101, medieval; Islam
102; federal legislation denial
of, 6; in history, overview, 3–4; Napoleon, 100, 126
Indian, early, 106; legislation narcotics: cocaine, 9–10, 19, 40,
supporting, 7, 8; strains and 41, 60; marijuana classification,
side effect variations for, 4–5 early, 9; opium and derivatives,
mescaline (peyote), 33, 51, 52–53, 9–10, 19, 24, 101, 102
129, 131 Nation, Carrie, 24
methamphetamine, 40, 135 National Commission on
Mevlevi dervish order, 93 Marihuana and Drug Abuse, 9
Mexican Academy of Pharmacy, National Organization for the
54 Reform of Marijuana Laws
Mexican immigrants, 17–18, 20, 21, (NORML), 38
57–58 Native Americans, 50
Mexico: alcohol consumption, Nepal, 77, 78, 144
51, 55, 56, 57; best study of Netherlands, 49, 73–74, 135
marijuana history, 142; drug Nigeria, 75
cartels in, 8; hemp history in, Nixon, Richard, 40
51–52; marijuana consumption, Nizari Ismailis, 95–99
8; marijuana history, 16, 20–21, Norway, 126
41, 45, 50–58
Middle Ages, 48, 79–80. See also Old Man of the Mountain, 95
hashish, medieval One Thousand and One Nights,
military barracks, 55–56, 69 84–85, 101
Mongols, 87, 88, 93 opium, 9–10, 19, 24, 101, 102
Moors, 54 Oregon, 7
morality, 11, 18–19, 137 organized crime, 8, 25, 41, 60–61
Morocco, 54, 77 Orta, Garcia da, 104, 105, 106

WEB.indb 152 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Index 153

Oseberg ship burial, 126, 127 Prohibition, 11, 18–19, 22, 24–26
Oxus region, 120–21 propaganda, anti-marijuana:
Assassin legends, 4, 94;
pacifism, 33 illegalization arguments, 6–12;
paganism, 126–27 racist-based, 17–18, 27; reefer
pain relief, 3 madness and criminality, 4, 16,
Pakistan, 77, 110, 118, 198 21, 25, 27, 57, 94
Panama Canal Zone report, 27, 28 property seizures, 6
peace, 1, 37, 71–72, 74 Propiá (Sergipe), Brazil, 69
Pen-Ts’ao Ching, 123–24 prostitutes, 21, 56
“Perilous Play” (Alcott), 101 Protestantism, 18–19
Peron, Dennis, 8 Proto-Indo-European (language),
Persia (modern Iran), 86, 89, 97–99, 114
101, 113, 121 psilocybin (mushrooms), 33, 52,
peyote cactus, 33, 51, 52–53, 129, 53, 129, 131, 136
131 public opinion: anti-marijuana
pharmaceuticals, 3, 26, 101, 102 public awareness campaigns,
Philippine Islands, 19 26–27; on legalization, modern,
pipes: African water, 64, 65, 8; against marijuana, 9, 57; U.S.
71; English archaeological counterculture and, 37
discoveries of, 126; Indian, pulque, 51, 55, 56, 57
109, 111; Jamaican, 62; Muslim Pure Food and Drug Act, 19
water, 78 purification rituals, 91–92, 116–18,
pipiltzintzintlis, 52, 53–54 117, 118–19
pito de pango, 67
poetry, 81–82, 92–93 Qalandars, 89, 90, 90–92, 100, 110
politics, 9 qinnab, 83
Polo, Marco, 94–95 Qur’an, 79, 80, 87–88, 92
poor man’s drug: Brazilian
marijuana, 66, 69; Colombian racism, 17–18, 23, 27, 31
marijuana, 59; Indian raphia palm wine, 70, 74
marijuana, 109–10; medieval Rastafarians, 63
Muslim hashish, 84, 102; Reagan, Ronald, 40
Mexican marijuana, 56–57; Rebel without a Cause (movie), 31
overview, 133–34, 137; “the red one,” 80
worldwide associations, 76 reefer, 16, 22
Popular Mechanics (magazine), 28 reefer madness, 4, 16, 21, 25, 27,
Portugal, 46, 49, 74, 134–35 57, 94
Posada, José Guadalupe, 56 Reefer Madness (movie), 4, 16
pottery artifacts, 125 reggae, 5, 63
prehistory, 113–20, 117, 127–32, Republicans, 9, 40
128 research studies, 3–4, 27, 28,
prisons, 6, 56, 69 135–36

WEB.indb 153 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 154 Index

riamba, 71, 72, 74–75 Sogdians, 121

Rig Veda, 108 soma, 105, 108, 115, 119, 130,
Rimbaud, Arthur, 101 144–45
rock music, 36 South Africa, 75
Romans, 107, 125 Spain, 46, 47, 51, 134–35
Roosevelt, Theodore, 18 speakeasies, 25
rope production, 47, 125 spiritual insights, 5, 62, 123, 127–
Rosa María, 54–55 33, 128, 135–36
Rosenthal, Franz, 81 Stonewall Riots, 37
Rudenko, Sergei, 117–18 Sufi Muslims (Sufis), 87, 88–94, 110
rum, 50 sugarcane cultivation, 49, 64–65
Rumi, 93 sunna, 88
Russia, 47 Sunni Muslims (Sunnis): drug
restrictions imposed by, 80–86;
sails, ship, 46 legalism of, 79–82, 87–88;
saloons, 24, 25 religious dissenters challenging,
sannyasa, sannyasins, 110–12 87–88, 90–91, 94, 95, 97, 98–99
Sanskrit, 113 Sweden, 135
Santa Rosa María, 51 Syria, 4, 77, 82, 86, 89, 90, 94–99
Savi, Jamal al-Din, 90
Scythia/Scythians, 115–22, 117 Taklamakan Desert, 121, 123
Seljuk Turks, 87, 97 “The Tale of the Hashish Eater”
sexual deviancy, 81, 84–85 (folk tale), 85
shadanaj, 86 T’ao Hung Ching, 124
Shafer Commission, 9, 11 Tatars, 86
shamanism, 124, 127–33, 128 taxation, 27–28, 47, 51, 58, 60–61,
Sherratt, Andrew, 125 104
Shi’a Muslims, 96–97, 98 The Teachings of Don Juan
Shiva (Hindu god), 103–4, 105, (Castañeda), 131
111, 111–12, 113 tea pads, 29
Silk Road, 121 Temperance movement, 19, 24
sin semilla buds, 13, 41, 78, 109, teonanácatl, 52, 53
121 Thailand, 135
slaves: African, and marijuana THC (delta-9-
dissemination, 48, 50, 54, tetrahydrocannabinol), 3–4, 11,
64–67, 69, 70, 74; Central Asian 12–13, 78, 105
mercenaries, 86; Indian, and THCA (tetrahydrocannabinolic
marijuana dissemination, 61–62 acid), 78
smoking methods: cigarettes, 51, Thracians, 116, 118
54, 69, 75; fire-burning, 118; Tilden’s Extract, 101
incense, 118; pipes, 62, 64, 65, tobacco, 10, 22, 51, 66, 78
71, 75, 78, 109; smoking sets, tombs, Siberian, 115–20
116–18, 117 trances, 129, 130–33

WEB.indb 154 10/7/15 10:24 AM

 Index 155

The Travels of Marco Polo (Polo and early, 16–23, 57–58; marijuana
Rusticiano da Pisa), 94–95 importation, 8, 41, 45, 57–58,
Turkey, 86, 93 63–64; marijuana legalization, 4,
Turkish Hashish Pavilion 6–12, 18–19, 21, 25, 28, 41
(Centennial Exposition), 101–2 U.S. Army, 27
“Turn On, Tune In, and Drop Out” U.S. Department of Agriculture
(counterculture worldview), 35 (USDA), 20
Uyghurs, 125
United Fruit Company, 59
United Nations, 20 Vedas, 105, 108
United States: alcohol production Vedic people, 113, 114–15, 119,
and consumption, 50; alcohol 144–45
restrictions and legislation, Venezuela, 8
11, 17, 18–19, 22, 24–25; anti- Vietnam War, 31–32, 37, 42
marijuana legislation, 4, 6, Vikings, 125–26
21, 25–28; anti-marijuana Villa, Pancho, 20, 58
propaganda, 4, 4 16, 16, 21, visions, 128–29, 130–32, 133
25, 27, 28; colonization and
international drug control, 19–20; War on Drugs, 38–42
conservativism and War on war preparation, 71–72
Drugs, 38–42; counterculture Washington, 7
emergence, 28–37, 38, 42, 76; weed, 73, 83, 89
cultivation and production wine, 79, 83, 84, 107, 119
businesses, 6, 41; cultivation wine of the Persians, 80
and production statistics, 134; witches, 126, 127
decriminalization legislation Women’s Christian Temperance
in, 7; hashish history, 101–2; Union, 24
hemp history, 11–12, 28, Woodstock Music and Art
47–48; imperialism and Festival, 36
trade expansion, 18; India, World War II hemp production, 12
counterculture view of, 103–4;
marijuana associations and Youth International Party (YIP),
prejudice, 4, 17–18, 20, 21, 27; 35–36, 37
marijuana consumption statistics,
8, 75, 134; marijuana exportation, Zambia, 75
59–60, 61; marijuana history, Zulus, 74

WEB.indb 155 10/7/15 10:24 AM

WEB.indb 156 10/7/15 10:24 AM
 About the Author

John Charles Chasteen is a North Carolina writer, translator of

Spanish and Portuguese, and, for twenty-five years, professor of
history at UNC Chapel Hill, where he was born (on campus) in
1955. Born in Blood and Fire, his concise overview of Latin American
history, is among the most read in the English language. Chas-
teen’s abiding scholarly interest has been the emotional roots of
nation and nationalism in nineteenth-century Latin America. His
books on the topic include Heroes on Horseback: A Life and Times
of the Last Gaucho Caudillos (1995), National Rhythms, African Roots:
A Deep History of Latin American Popular Dance (2004), and Ameri-
canos: Latin America’s Struggle for Independence (2008). Chasteen is
also an award-winning editor and translator of Latin American
fiction and nonfiction, most recently The Alienist and Other Stories
of Nineteenth-Century Brazil (2012), by the Brazilian literary master
Joaquim Machado de Assis, and The Gaucho Juan Moreira (2014),
the classic Argentine “true crime” saga, by Eduardo Gutiérrez. He
has a bilingual screenplay adaptation of W. H. Hudson’s The Purple
Land, if anyone knows a producer. He lives with his wife, Carmen,
in the countryside near Chapel Hill.

157

WEB.indb 157 10/7/15 10:24 AM

WEB.indb 158 10/7/15 10:24 AM