PIIS0002937808005644
PIIS0002937808005644
PIIS0002937808005644
org
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine vertical trans- vaginal delivery or emergency cesarean in labor was no different when
mission rates of hepatitis C in 2 tertiary level maternity units. compared with those delivered by planned cesarean (4.2% vs 3.0%, P
⫽ NS). Among women in whom hepatitis C RNA was detected antena-
STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of all hepatitis C-
tally, this finding remained (7.2% vs 5.3%, P ⫽ NS). No case of ver-
positive mothers and their pregnancy outcomes.
tical transmission was noted among hepatitis C RNA-negative
RESULTS: Of 74,629 deliveries, 559 liveborn infants were born to 545 mothers.
hepatitis C mothers; the rate of antenatal hepatitis C infection was
CONCLUSION: This study reports a vertical transmission rate for hep-
0.7%. In the neonatal period, 423 infants tested negative for hepatitis C
atitis C of 4.1%. These results do not support a recommendation of
ribonucleic acid (RNA) (75.7%), 18 were positive (3.2%), and 118
planned cesarean to reduce vertical transmission of hepatitis C
infants were not tested or were lost to follow-up (21.1%). The overall
infection.
vertical transmission rate is 18 of 441 (4.1%, 95% confidence interval
2.3% to 5.9%). The vertical transmission rate for infants following Key words: hepatitis C infection, vertical transmission
Cite this article as: McMenamin MB, Jackson AD, Lambert J, et al. Obstetric management of hepatitis C-positive mothers: analysis of vertical transmission in 559
mother-infant pairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:315.e1-315.e5.
with similar numbers of Irish and non- Positive 295 7.1% (18/255) b
⬍.05 b
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b
national mothers studied. However, of Negative 155 0% (0/117)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
note there was a 2-fold increased rate of Not known 98 0% (0/69)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
preterm delivery in the group studied HIV status
(11% less than 37 weeks and 4% less than .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b b
34 weeks of gestation). The preterm de- Positive 18 5.9% (1/17) NS
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
b
livery rate for the general antenatal pop- Negative 534 4.1% (17/418)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ulation in the time period studied was Not known 7 0% (0/6)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5.7% less than 37 weeks.4,5
Mode of delivery
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
fants negative, 49 not tested, 0 of 117, P RNA, 1 had maternal HIV positive serol- bined with the metaanalysis of Thomas et
⬍ .05). In cases in which maternal HCV ogy antenatally. Seventeen of the 18 in- al,10 then together we report circa 850
RNA status was unknown or not tested fected infants testing positive were born HCV RNA negative mothers who deliv-
for, the vertical transmission rate was 0% to Irish mothers. ered hepatitis C negative infants.
(0 infant positive, 69 infants negative, 29 Vertical transmission in the group of
not tested, 0 of 69). infants in which the mother was HIV
Two hundred thirty-three infants C OMMENT coinfected antenatally was 5.9%. This is
born to mothers HCV RNA positive The antenatal hepatitis C infection rate in lower than published studies, perhaps
(79%) delivered vaginally, 23 (7.8%) by our study was 0.7%, which is comparable because of the high cesarean delivery rate
planned cesarean, and 39 (13.2%) by with that found in other studies in similar in this group, and thus supports the cur-
emergency cesarean in labor. populations. Our vertical transmission rent recommendations for cesarean de-
rate at 4.1% was similar to that in the pub- livery in HIV and HCV coinfected moth-
HIV coinfection lished literature.8-15 This is 1 of the largest ers.20 Other studies have reported 2- to
Eighteen of 559 infants were born to series in the literature.8-10,25-27 3.8-fold higher rates of vertical transmis-
mothers coinfected with HIV, and 3 in- A significant proportion of infants sion in which the mother is coinfected
fants were born to mothers coinfected (21%, n ⫽ 118) were lost to follow-up. with HIV.7,8,16,17
with hepatitis B. All HIV-positive moth- Inclusion of these babies could alter the It has been suggested that the immu-
ers were treated antenatally with highly rates we calculated for vertical transmis- nosuppressive effect of HIV results in a
active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). sion. This reflects some of the difficulties higher HCV viral load. We noted no dif-
One infant tested positive for hepatitis C encountered in the management of this ference in hepatitis C vertical transmis-
RNA in which the mother was coinfected group of patients. Despite the input of sion between those coinfected with HIV
with HIV, and 1 infant did not attend for drug liaison nurses and social workers, and those not coinfected with HIV. This
testing. The infected infant of the mother this group of mothers tend to be poor suggests that antenatal treatment with
coinfected with HIV delivered by emer- hospital attenders. Similar noncompli- HAART, which, by restoring immune
gency cesarean at 35 weeks to an Irish ance with neonatal follow-up has been function, may reduce degree of HCV
mother with a birthweight of 2.28 kg. In found in other studies, with a default rate viremia, resulting in a lower risk of hep-
the cases in which the mother was coin- for neonatal sampling ranging from 8% atitis C transmission, as noted in other
fected with hepatitis B, 1 infant tested to 50%.11,12,28 This is certainly an area studies.32 The numbers of our study did
negative for hepatitis C RNA and 2 were that requires improvement. not allow us to make any significant con-
not tested. Vertical transmission rate in The main risk factor identified for verti- clusions about hepatitis C vertical trans-
which the mother was hepatitis C/HIV cal transmission was maternal hepatitis C mission rates among women both hepa-
coinfected, compared with HCV-posi- viremia. Mode of delivery did not influ- titis C and HIV positive.
tive/HIV-negative was 5.9% (95% CI, ence vertical transmission rate of hepatitis More controversial is the effect of
0% to 17.2% [1 of 17] vs 4.1%, 95% CI, C. For mothers who tested positive for mode of delivery on vertical transmis-
2.2% to 6.0% [17 of 418], P ⫽ NS). hepatitis C RNA, vertical transmission was sion. In our study vertical transmission
In these 2 hospitals, planned cesarean significantly higher at 7.1% when com- was similar when the infants were ex-
is routinely recommended for HIV/ pared with 0% transmission for those who posed to labor, compared with those
HCV coinfected women. In the study tested HCV RNA negative antenatally. born by planned prelabor cesarean in
group of 18 HIV coinfected women, 9 This has been reported previously in the HIV-negative, HCV-positive mothers
had planned cesarean (50%), 5 emer- literature and reflects that viremia holds a (4.2% vs 3.0%). When the analysis was
gency cesarean in labor (27.8%), and 4 higher risk of vertical transmission.13,14,16 confined to mothers who were hepatitis
(22.2%) vaginal delivery. Total cesarean Although there are a few reports of vertical C RNA positive, it again showed no sig-
delivery rate in this group was 77.8% (14 transmission in which the mother did not nificant difference in rates of vertical
of 18). have viremia detected antenatally, this transmission (7.2% vs 5.3%). It is possi-
would seem to be a rare occurrence.29,30 ble that to demonstrate the protective ef-
Infants testing hepatitis C Maternal HCV RNA status can be of ben- fect of cesarean delivery with such low
RNA positive efit in the counseling of patients, and if rates of vertical transmission that a larger
Maternal HCV RNA tests were positive hepatitis C RNA is not detected antena- number of cases controlled for viral load
in all 18 infected infants. Of these 10 de- tally, then the patient can be reassured and would be required to minimize the risk
livered by normal vaginal delivery, 2 de- advised that the risk of vertical transmis- of a type 2 error. Whereas some studies
livered by ventouse, and 6 delivered by sion is minimal. have shown a protective benefit from
cesarean (5 emergency cesarean in labor, Seroconversion in pregnancy has been cesarean delivery,26,33 many have
1 planned cesarean). None had a fetal recognized, however,31 and, therefore, a not.9,25,34,35 Thus, the majority of the
scalp electrode attached or a fetal blood third-trimester negative HCV RNA result published literature would suggest that
sampling performed in labor. Of the in- would be required prior to planning labor mode of delivery is not a key factor influ-
fants testing positive for hepatitis C management. If our numbers are com- encing hepatitis C vertical transmission.
A number of areas for improvement 4. Louis FJ, Maubert B, Le Hesran J-Y, Kem- 20. Newell M-L. Pregnancy and HIV infection: A
have been identified. Higher rates of an- megne J, Delaporte E, Louis J-P. High preva- European consensus on management. Execu-
lence of anti-hepatitis C virus antibodies in tive summary. AIDS 2002;16:S1-18.
tenatal HCV RNA testing would aid in Cameroon rural forest area. Trans R Soc Trop 21. Chutaputti A. Adverse effects and other
the counseling of patients regarding Med Hyg 1994;88:53-4. safety aspects of the hepatitis C antivirals. J
their risk of vertical transmission, with 5. Floreani A, Paternoster D, Zappala‘ F, et al. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15:E156-63.
the rate of transmission in which the Hepatitis C virus infection in pregnancy. Br J 22. Dunn D, Gibb D, Healy M, et al. Timing and
mother does not have HCV RNA de- Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:325-9. interpretation of tests for diagnosing perinatally
6. Goldberg D, McIntyre PG, Smith R, et al. Hep- acquired hepatitis C virus infection. Pediatr In-
tected at 0% in this study. Transmission atitis C virus among high and low risk pregnant fect Dis J 2001;20:715-6.
is rare in this instance,29,30 and it could women in Dundee: Unliked anonymous testing. 23. National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
be argued that with a negative third-tri- Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:365-70. Clinical report for the year 2001-2005. Dublin:
mester HCV RNA, these mothers could 7. Rao MR, Naficy AB, Darwish MA, et al. Fur- National Maternity Hospital.
have standard labor management, with- ther evidence for association of hepatitis C in- 24. Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Clinical
fection with parenteral schistosomiasis treat- report for the year 2001-2005. Dublin: Rotunda
out the need to avoid intrapartum pro- ment in Egypt. BMC Infect Dis 2002; 2: 30-33. Hospital.
cedures. Intrapartum procedure rate was 8. Zanetti AR, Tanzi E, Paccagnini S, et al. 25. Conte D, Fraquelli M, Prati D, Colucci A,
low at 4.3%; however, 4 fetal scalp elec- Mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C vi- Minola E. Prevalence and clinical course of
trodes were applied in which the mater- rus. Lancet 1995;345:289-91. chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and
nal HCV RNA was positive. Improved 9. Resti M, Azzari C, Mannelli F, et al. Mother to rate of HCV vertical transmission in a cohort of
child transmission of hepatitis C virus: Prospec- 15,250 women. Hepatology 2000;31:751-5.
education of delivery ward staff could tive study of risk factors and timing of infection in 26. Gibb D, Goodall R, Dunn D, et al. Mother-
eliminate this potential risk for transmis- children born to women seronegative for HIV-1. to-child transmission of hepatitis C virus: Evi-
sion. Follow-up of infants from HCV- BMJ 1998;317:437-41. dence for preventable peripartum transmission.
positive mothers needs improvement; 10. Thomas SL, Newell ML, Peckham CS, Lancet 2000;356:904-7.
better communication with communi- Ades AE, Hall AJ. A review of hepatitis C virus 27. Healy C, Cafferkey M, Conroy A, et al. Hep-
(HCV) vertical transmission: Risks of transmis- atitis C infection in an Irish antenatal population.
ty-based health care staff may increase sion to infants born to mothers with and without Ir J Med Sci 2000;169:180-2.
patient compliance follow-up. HCV viraemia or human immunodeficiency virus 28. Ruiz-Extremera A, Salmerón J, Torres C, et
All mothers testing hepatitis C positive infection. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:108-17. Al. Follow-up of transmission of hepatitis C to ba-
in the 2 hospitals studied are referred to the 11. Healy CM, Cafferkey MT, Conroy A, et al. bies of human immunodeficiency virus-negative
local hepatology service. Although non- Outcome of infants born to hepatitis C infected women: The role of breast-feeding in transmis-
women. Ir J Med Sci 2000;170:103-6. sion. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2000;19:511-6.
compliance with follow-up is evident in 12. Croxson M, Couper A, Voss L, Groves D, 29. Dore G, Kaldor J, McGaughan W. System-
our study, those who avail of the service Gunn T. Vertical transmission of hepatitis C virus in atic review of role of polymerase chain reaction
may benefit from ribavirin/interferon New Zealand. N Z Med J 1997;110:165-7. in defining infectiousness among people in-
therapy on completion of pregnancy to aid 13. Granovsky MO, Minkoff HL, Tess BH, et al. fected with hepatitis C virus. BMJ 1997;
viral clearance. This would reduce the risk Hepatitis C virus infection in the mothers and in- 315:333-7.
fants cohort study. Pediatrics 1998;102:355-9. 30. Pembrey L, Newell M-L, Tovo P-A, the
of vertical transmission for subsequent 14. Ferrero S, Lungaro P, Bruzzone BM, Gotta EPHN Collaborators. The management of HCV
pregnancies and thus aid in antenatal C, Bentivoglio G, Ragni N. Prospective study of infected pregnant women and their children.
counseling of positive patients. mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis C vi- European Paediatric HCV Network. J Hepatol
In conclusion, vertical transmission rate rus: A 10-year survey (1990-2000). Acta Obstet 2005;43:515-25.
of HCV antenatal infection was 4.1%. Gynecol Scand 2003;82:229-34. 31. Zambon M, Lockwood D. Hepatitis C sero-
15. Kumar RM, Frossad PM, Hughes PF. Sero- conversion in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
Mode of delivery did not influence this, prevalence and mother-to-infant transmission of 1994;101:722-4.
and, therefore, this study does not support hepatitis C in asymptomatic Egyptian women. Eur 32. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Net-
planned prelabor cesarean to prevent J Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;75:177-82. work. A significant sex— but not elective cesar-
HCV vertical transmission. f 16. Mast EE, Hwang LY, Seto DS, et al. Risk ean section— effect on mother-to-child trans-
factors for perinatal transmission of hepatitis C mission of hepatitis C virus infection. J Infect Dis
virus (HCV) and the natural history of HCV infec- 2005;192:1872-9.
REFERENCES tion acquired in infancy. J Infect Dis 33. Paccagnini S, Principi N, Massironi E, et al.
1. World Health Organization. Global distribu- 2005;192:1880-9. Perinatal transmission and manifestation of hep-
tion of hepatitis A, B, and C. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 17. Mariné-Barjoan E, Berrébi A, Giordanego V, atitis C virus infection in a high risk population.
2002;77:45-7. et al. HCV/HIV co-infection, HCV viral load and Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995;14:195-9.
2. Roudot-Thoraval F, Bastie A, Pawlotsky J-M, mode of delivery: Risk factors fro mother-to- 34. Spencer J, Latt N, Beeby P, et al. Transmis-
Dhumeaux D, and the Study Group for the Prev- child transmission of hepatitis C virus? AIDS sion of hepatitis C virus to infants of human im-
alence and the Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Vi- 2007;21:1811-5. munodeficiency virus-negative intravenous
rus. Epidemiological factors affecting the sever- 18. Pembrey L, Newell M-L, Peckham C. Is drug-using mothers: Rate of infection and as-
ity of hepatitis C virus related liver disease: A there a case for hepatitis C infection screening sessment of risk factors for transmission. J Viral
French survey of 6,664 patients. Hepatology in the antenatal period? J Med Screen Hepatol 1997;4:395-409.
1997;26:485-90. 2003;10:161-8. 35. European Paediatric Hepatitis C Virus Net-
3. Boxall E, Skidmore S, Evans C, Nightingale 19. Plunkett BA, Grobman WA. Routine hepa- work. Effects of mode of delivery and infant
S. The prevalence of hepatitis B and C in an titis C virus screening in pregnancy: A cost-ef- feeding on the risk of mother-to-child transmis-
antenatal population of various ethnic origin. fectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol sion of hepatitis C virus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
Epidemiol Infect 1994;113:523-8. 2005;192:1153-61. 2001;108:371-7.