Ej 1309564
Ej 1309564
shanlax
#SINCE1990
International Journal of Education
128 http://www.shanlaxjournals.com
Shanlax
International Journal of Education shanlax
#SINCE1990
http://www.shanlaxjournals.com 129
Shanlax
shanlax
#SINCE1990
International Journal of Education
130 http://www.shanlaxjournals.com
Shanlax
International Journal of Education shanlax
#SINCE1990
analysed the treatment effects only for the English Fourth 100 33.33%
Learners with learning disabilities from the full
School Fifth 100 33.33%
sample in the study of the ( Reading Intervention for
grade Sixth 100 33.33%
Adolescents (RIA) for English Learners (Vaughn
Total 300 100.0
et al., 2018). And to analyse the treatment effects,
2 groups (treatment and comparison) were created
from the four originally randomised groups of 10 to Research Instrument
15 students. The study results exposed the challenges The instrument of the study consisted of a
of improving reading outcomes for English learners measure of the relationship of language skills to
with learning disabilities in high school. students’ learning difficulties in English at the
Swanson (2020) examined the prevalence of primary stage from the students’ point of view. The
latent classes at risk for reading or math disabilities study instrument consisted of two parts. Part one
for elementary school children whose mother tongue included general information about the study sample
was Spanish. The sample of this study consisted of (students). The second part included the statements
394 students ( 155 first grade, 129-second grade, of the questionnaire addressed to teachers, which
and 110 from the third grade) were selected from 30 were divided into the following topics (listening,
classrooms from urban schools with a high poverty speaking, reading, and writing). The response was
representation from two large school districts in graded on each statement according to a triple scale
southwestern United States, 192 boys, and 202 girls. and was determined at three levels: high (3 degrees),
The findings of this study supported the idea that medium (2 degrees), and low (1 degree).
children at risk for certain LDs reflect a latent class
group that can be separated from a heterogeneous Validity and Reliability of the Instrument
sample of children who differ in reading, L1, and L2 To ensure the validity of the instrument, the
measures of vocabulary, math, fluid intelligence, and correlation coefficient was calculated. The correlation
attention. coefficients are shown in Table (2) below.
Results of the research question of the study. Speaking 2.12 .518 Medium
To answer this question, the mean scores and
Reading 2.12 .493 Medium
standard deviations of the relationship of language
Writing 2.09 .516 Medium
skills to students’ learning difficulties in English
Total 2.12 .421 Medium
were extracted as follows.
The first field: language skills
Table (3) shows the mean scores and standard It is evident from Table (3) that the overall degree
deviations of the relationship of language skills of assessment of the relationship of language skills
with learning difficulties among English language with learning difficulties among English language
students and the overall degree of for the language students was generally high. All of the statements of
skills fields. the questionnaire were also high, as the “speaking”
field came in the first place, while the “writing field”
Table 3: The Mean Scores and Standard came in the last place.
Deviations of the Statements of the Language
Skills Fields Arranged in Descending Order The Listening Field
According to the Mean Scores Table (4) shows the mean scores and standard
deviations of the relationship of language skills
Language Mean Standard
Rank with learning difficulties among English language
skills Score Deviation
students and the total degree of assessment of the
Listening 2.17 .567 Medium
listening field and its statements.
Table 4: The Mean Scores and Standard Deviations of the Listening
Field Arranged in Descending Order According to the Mean Scores
Rank Statement Mean score Standard deviation Level
Weakness of students in following the instructions of
1 2.19 .688 Medium
the course in English language by listening
2 Not linking the listening material to real-life situations 2.17 .757 Medium
Poor ability of students to connect sentences by
3 2.13 .761 Medium
listening
Difficulty distinguishing students by hearing similar
4 2.08 .735 Medium
words
Lack of sufficient audio materials to get students used
5 2.08 .752 Medium
to listening
6 Poor comprehension of the listening material 2.08 .777 Medium
Total listening field 2.12 .493 Medium
The results in Table (4) show that the overall The Speaking Field
degree of assessment of the relationship of language Table (5) shows the mean scores and standard
skills with learning difficulties in listening was deviations of the relationship of language skills
medium. The highest statement was “students’ to learning difficulties among English language
weakness in following the instructions of the course students and the overall assessment degree for the
in English by listening”. In contrast, the statement speaking field and its statements.
“Poor comprehension of the listening material” came
in the last rank.
132 http://www.shanlaxjournals.com
Shanlax
International Journal of Education shanlax
#SINCE1990
Table 5: The Mean Scores and Standard Deviations of the Statements of the Speaking Fields
Arranged in Descending Order According to the Mean Scores
Rank Statement Mean score Standard deviation Level
1 Not focusing on speaking experiences during the lessons. 2.20 .757 Medium
2 Poor ability of students to express their thoughts orally 2.19 .718 Medium
3 Poor ability of students to form correct sentences 2.17 .753 Medium
4 Poor ability of students to synthesize language terms 2.11 .738 Medium
Total speaking field 2.17 .567 Medium
The results in Table (5) show that the overall The Reading Field
degree of assessment of the relationship of language Table (6) shows the mean scores and standard
skills with learning difficulties in speaking was deviations of the relationship of language skills
medium. All of its statements were also high, as the with learning difficulties among English language
statement, “Not focusing on speaking experiences students and the overall degree of assessment of the
during the lessons” came in the first rank. The reading field and its statements.
statement, “ Poor ability of students to synthesise
language terms” ranked last.
Table 6: The Mean Scores and Standard Deviations of the Statements of the Reading Fields
Arranged in Descending Order According to the Mean Scores
Rank Statement Mean score Standard deviation Level
Difficulty reading and summarizing English texts
1 2.20 .762 Medium
by the teacher
2 Difficulty pronouncing vowels in English 2.16 .727 Medium
Difficulty understanding the meanings of the
3 2.13 .718 Medium
reading material
4 Difficulty deriving word roots 2.05 .780 Medium
5 Difficulty reading English sentences 2.05 .757 Medium
6 Difficulty distinguishing silent letters 1.95 .808 Medium
Total reading field 2.09 .516 Medium
It is evident from Table (6) that the overall degree of The Writing Field
assessment of the relationship of language skills with Table (7) shows the mean scores and standard
learning difficulties in the field of reading was medium. deviations of the relationship of language skills to
All its statements were also high, as the statement, students’ learning difficulties in the English language
“Difficulty reading and summarising English texts and the overall degree of assessment for writing and
by the teacher” came first. The statement, “Difficulty its statements.
distinguishing silent letters” ranked last.
Table 7: The Mean Scores and Standard Deviations of the Statements of the Writing Fields
Arranged in Descending Order According to the Mean Scores
Rank Statement Mean score Standard deviation Level
1 Lack of marks (grades) for written assignments 2.21 .737 High
2 Difficulty distinguishing letters and syllables 2.13 .740 High
3 Lack of marks (grades) for written assignments 2.12 .771 High
4 Difficulty expressing in writing life situations. 2.07 .751 High
5 Lack of written assignments assigned to students 2.06 .778 High
Total writing field 2.12 .518 High
http://www.shanlaxjournals.com 133
Shanlax
shanlax
#SINCE1990
International Journal of Education
The results in Table (7) show that the overall all the averages in this field came high. This is a clear
degree of assessment of the relationship of language indication that students face real weaknesses in the
skills to students’ learning difficulties in writing was field of writing. The researcher attributes this to the
medium. All of its statements were also high, as teachers’ lack of focus in their teaching on this skill
the statement, “Lack of marks (grades) for written and their focus on other skills. In addition, there are
assignments” ranked first, while the statement, “the weak appropriate opportunities for the student to
lack of written tasks assigned to students” came last. show his skill in writing and expressing himself.
Discussion Recommendation
The results in Table (3) showed that all language One of the most prominent recommendations of
skills statements received high grades by teachers. this study is to focus on the need to diversify teaching
The fields of the questionnaire came in the following methods, reduce the teaching burden for teachers
order, speaking, writing, listening, and reading. from lessons, and open channels of communication
In the field of listening, the results showed between family and school to follow up on students’
that the students face a real weakness in listening, affairs. It is recommended to identify problems
especially the linking of sentences while listening. in the process of learning English and increasing
The researcher attributes this to the teachers’ lack the awareness of students and their families about
of focus in their teaching on this particular skill and the importance of learning English. In addition,
their focus on other skills, in addition to the lack of they are encouraging schools to establish a unique
a curriculum in which the teacher uses to teach that English language laboratory equipped with the latest
skill. Listening skill largely depends on the teacher, equipment to enable students to listen to the language
who in turn can be asked to possess this skill. better and with sound pronunciation and encourage
As for the field of speaking, the results showed teachers to develop remedial plans to improve the
that all the averages of this field came at a high level. achievement level of students.
The researcher attributes the reason for this because
students face a real weakness in conversation skills Acknowledgements
because of their teachers not focusing on conducting The authors extend their appreciation to the
conversations in English in the classroom. In Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid
addition, students’ fear of making mistakes or feeling University for funding this work through Small
shy while they speak in front of their colleagues is Research Groups under grant number (RGP.1
also another reason. This indicates that the students’ /40/42).
speaking skills are still affected by many problems.
Students face great difficulty in speaking the English References
language due to not being exposed to sufficient Abdel Moneim, Tharwat Mohamed, and Taghreed
experience to develop this skill. Hamada. “Effectiveness of Training Program
In reading, the results showed that all the based on Strategies of Attention and Working
averages in this field came at a high level. This is Memory to Improve Reading Skill among
a clear indication that teachers see that students Primary Stage Students with Learning
face weakness in terms of reading skills. It is also Disabilities in English.” Journal of the
an indication of the weak foundation of students College of Education, vol. 19, no. 4, 2019.
concerning reading, especially letter training. Abu Salah, Ana Youssef Salah. Difficulties of
Students find it very difficult to distinguish letters, Learning Writing in English Language Faced
by (4-6) Basic Grades Students from the
especially those written and not pronounced, as
Point of View of their Teachers in the Capital
the student is not exposed to many exercises and
Amman. Middle East University, 2017.
activities that enable him to distinguish between
Al-Arifi, R.S. “Difficulties Facing Teaching
them.
English Language at the Primary Level
As for the writing field, the results showed that
from the Point of View of Teachers and the
134 http://www.shanlaxjournals.com
Shanlax
International Journal of Education shanlax
#SINCE1990
Author Details
Mohamad Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, Assistant Professor, Special Education Department, King Khalid
University, Saudi Arabia, Email ID: mkhasawneh@kku.edu.sa.
http://www.shanlaxjournals.com 135