Language Death
Language Death
By
1
A.D. 1443 A.H 2022
David Crystal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction
2
Definitions of language death
It should be noted that the use of the term "language death", is a
metaphorical one. According to one view, "languages neither
live nor die. They are used or ceased to be used" (Pande 1965: 206). It
may look obvious that "a language dies when it no longer has any
speakers" (Campbell 1994: 1960; Romaine 1989: 380 ). However, as
Romaine points out, the matter is not easy. For example, like the death of
a human being, the death of a language passes through a series of phases,
and it is not a straightforward matter to pinpoint the moment (or date or
even year) when a given language dies. It is often stated that a language is
dead even before the last native speaker of the language dies. If there are
only a few elderly speakers of a language left and no longer use that
language to communicate, then the language is effectively dead. A
language that has reached such a reduced stage of use is generally
considered dying. Half of the world's spoken languages are not being
taught to new generations of children. Once a language ceases to be a
native language, that is, if children are not socialized in it as the primary
language, the transmission process ends and the language itself will not
. .survive beyond the current generations(ibid)
Classification of language death
3
Classification in terms of cause
In terms of the cause, language death may be classified as follows: (i)
language death due to the death of the population, and (ii) language death
due to language shift (also known as language replacement and language
displacement. It seems that language death of type (ii) is much more
:common than that of type (i). We shall consider each of the two types
For this type of language death at least three terms have been proposed:
(i) language murder, i.e. physical liquidation (genocide) of all speakers of
a language, (ii) biological language death, referring to language death
caused by rapid population collapse, and (iii) glottocide, referring to the
destruction of the language of a group due to causes such as genocide and
repression. In the following, we shall adopt the term "glottocide" to refer
.to the type of language death caused by the death of the population
.
Matisoff (1991: 201) notes that the people of the once-powerful empire of
the Xixia (or Tangut), on the Western fringes of China, in the
Qinghai/Tibet/Sichuan region, were annihilated by Kubilai Khan's
Mongols in the closing years of the thirteenth century. Dixon (1991a:
241) reports an instance of glottocide caused by a volcanic eruption
on the island of Sumbawa, Indonesia, in 1815, which resulted in the death
.of all speakers of the Tamboran language
Language death due to language shift. This occurs when a given language
.dies because its speakers shift to another language
4
In terms of speed, language death may be classified as follows: (i) instant
death also known as sudden death, Linguicide or linguistic genocide
occurs when all or almost all native speakers of that language die from
natural disasters, wars, etc. and (ii) gradual death, or slow death. of
language that usually occurs when people who speak that language
interact with speakers of a more prestigious language. This group of
people first becomes bilingual, then, with the new generations, the level
of competence decreases. And then there are no native speakers . Instant
or sudden death seems uncommon while gradual or slow death seems
common (Dressler and Wodak-Leodolter,1977a: 5; Matisoff, 1991: 201)
.
Classification in terms of register involved in language death
This classification concerns registers or styles, and two types may be
recognized (Campbell ,1994: 1960- 1961; Campbell and Muntzel ,1989:
185; Hill1983: 260): (i) the top-down pattern, and (ii) the bottom-up
.pattern
The top-down pattern seems much more common than the bottom-up
pattern. This is noted by Hill (1983: 260) regarding North American
.languages
An example from Australia is the following: Alf Palmer a person from
northeast Australia knew that Warrungu used to have two styles: ordinary
and avoidance styles. (The latter was used, for instance, between taboo
relations, such as mother-in law and son-in-law.) Although he had an
excellent command of the ordinary style, he admitted that he did not
know the avoidance style. That is, the avoidance style had disappeared,
.but the ordinary style remained
The opposite pattern, i.e. bottom-up referred to as "bottom-to-top death"
by Campbell and Muntzel (1989: 185). It is called Latinate pattern by Hill
(1983: 260). It is "exemplified by the famous case of Latin, where the
5
repertoire of registers suffers attrition from the bottom up, being
abandoned first in the family vernacular and surviving ultimately only in
.the most elevated contexts" (Hill1983:260)
6
modern researchers must be very careful in their contacts with remote
villages, since the transmission of a trivial disease can be fatal. This
greatly affects languages spoken by small groups, for example, it is well
known that the Arauá language disappeared in 1877 because of a measles
.epidemic
Economic pressure. In this case, the disappearance occurs because the.4
speakers believe that their children will have a better future if they learn a
certain language. In two generations the original language will be in
danger of disappearing. This is the case of the pressure of English on
many languages, including some national languages such as Danish or
Norwegian, which, in this particular case and at the moment, are not in
danger. In the past some economic activities had a disastrous effect on the
indigenous peoples so the rubber fever (1879-1945) decimated numerous
.Amazonian peoples especially in northern Peru
.5
Cultural prestige. This mechanism is often related to the previous one,
since cultural prestige often comes from material wealth. It is one of the
most important mechanisms for the disappearance of small languages. As
soon as a foreign language gains prestige and the cultural or economic
elite begins to use it, it will be a short time until this learning moves to
the geographical and cultural periphery and children stop learning their
own language in favor of the external one. Several of the languages
displaced by Romanization would have undergone such a process and
.likewise the old Elamite replaced by the Iranian languages
7
the Icahuates decided to migrate south and was integrated along with the
.Muniches being absorbed by them
8
agreement about the number of languages currently in use, but it may
.range between 6,000 and 10,000 languages
9
& Romaine 2000, p. 23). However, language can influence people in
positive ways as well. As an illustration, people can have an emotional
experience and sense of pride and identity when they reacquire their
.ancestors’ mother tongue
10
aims to collect up-to-date information on endangered languages and share
the latest research on them(https://hmong.es/wiki/Language_death)
11
Crystal in his concise book which contains five chapters, he addresses
:five central questions
?What is language death.1
?Why should we care.2
?Why do languages die.3
?Where do we begin.4
?What can be done.5
Crystal introduces a classification system that allows the researcher to
place languages on a language death continuum (p. 21). Languages that
are spoken by a population that is socially and economically
disadvantaged and under pressure to adopt a majority language may begin
to have fewer new child speakers and become potentially endangered.
When there are no new child speakers of a language and the only
remaining speakers who know the language well are young adults, the
language is endangered. If the youngest proficient speakers are over the
age of fifty (it is not clear why this cutoff point was chosen) the language
is classified as seriously endangered. When only a few, mostly quite old,
speakers remain, the language is moribund. And, finally, when there are
no remaining speakers, the language is extinct. Although the taxonomy
sounds quite straightforward, Crystal further explains that any
classificatory system must take into account many variables, such as the
number of speakers relative to the total population: If a language has only
1000 speakers, but the total population of the community is 1500, the
language is probably not endangered, assuming the community itself is
stable. But if there were only 1000 speakers of English in the US, with a
.total population of 275 million, we would certainly have cause to worry
Language Vitality
In 2002/2003, UNESCO assembled an international group of linguists to
develop a framework for determining the vitality of a language in order to
12
assist in policy development, identification of needs, and appropriate
safeguard measures. This group identified six factors to evaluate language
vitality. Taken together, these factors would determine the vitality of a
language and the type of measures required for its maintenance or
.revitalization
The six factors that evaluate language vitality are:
1.Intergenerational Language Transmission – This is what is
happening now on a very low scale. Grandparents teach parents and
grandchildren the language using oral tradition. If a language is used by
all ages, it is considered safe. If there are no speakers, it is extinct. Here is
an illustration of the Degrees of Endangerment:
13
3.Proportion of Speakers within the Population – What proportion of
the total population can speak the language? This is often very low and is
typically measured in Degrees of Endangerment:
14
used. For example, a language used as the medium of instruction for all
courses and all levels will rank higher than a language taught only one
hour per week.
15
revitalization (the rescue of a "dying" language). It has been pointed out
that there has only been one successful instance of a complete language
revival, that of the Hebrew language, creating a new generation of native
speakers without any pre-existing native speakers as a model
) .)wikipedia.org
Conclusion
References
16
Campbell, L.(1994).Language Death. In R.E.Asher(Editor-in-Cheaf),
.Vol.4,1960-1968
Černý, M.( 2010). Language death versus language survival: A global
perspective. Beyond Globalization: Exploring the Limits of
.Globalization in the Regional Context,pp.51-57
Crystal, David. (2000). Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge
.University Press
Dixon,R.M.W.(1991a).The Endangered Languages of
Austrlia,Indonesia,and Oceania. In Robert H.Robins and
.Eugenius M.Uhlenbeck(eds.),229-255
Dressler,W. & Wodak-Leodolter,R.(1977a).Language Preservation and
.Language Death in Brittany.Linguistics 1991:33-44
Grenoble, L & Whaley, L.( 1998). Endangered languages. 1st ed.
Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
Hill,Jane.H. (1983).Language Death in Uto-Aztecan .International
.Journal of American Linguistics 49(3):258-276
Hoffmann, M. (2009). Endangered Languages, Linguistics, and
.Culture:Researching and Reviving the Unami Language of the Lenape
Krauss, M. (1992). The world's languages in crisis. Language, 18(1),
.pp.4--10
Matisoff,James.A.(1991).Endangered Languages of Mainland
Southeas Asia.In Robert H.Robins and Eugenius
.M.Uhlenbeck(eds.),189- 228
Nettle, D & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of
the World’s Languages. 1st ed. Oxford [England]: Oxford University
.Press
Pande,Govid Chandra.(1965).The Life and Death of Languages.
.Diogenes51:193-2010
Romaine,S.(1989).Bilingualism. Basil Blackwell
17
Ruhlen, M. (1991). A guide to the world's languages. 1st ed. Stanford:
.Stanford University Press
Thomason,S.(2001).Language Contact. Edinburgh: Great Britain.
.Edinburgh University Press Ltd
Wurm, S. (1991). Language death and disappearance: causes and
. .circumstances. Diogenes, 39(153), pp.1--18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet References
https://www.sayitfirst.ca/projects/unesco
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_death
18