Rating Sheet Rubric For Research Presentation and Paper
Rating Sheet Rubric For Research Presentation and Paper
Instructions: Rate each component of a research paper using the following rubrics. Place a checkmark (/) in the cell that corresponds to the description of your rating on
the criteria.
Fully Addressed (5) — The specific criterion is completely and excellently met. The aspect of the paper being evaluated is presented with exceptional clarity, depth, and precision, showing a thorough
understanding and application of the concept.
Mostly Addressed (4) — The criterion is largely met with only minor shortcomings. The aspect of the paper being evaluated is well-developed and demonstrates a strong understanding, though it may have
slight room for improvement or minor errors.
Partially Addressed (3) — The criterion is met to a moderate extent. The aspect of the paper being evaluated shows an adequate understanding and application but lacks in some areas, indicating room for
further development or clarity.
Poorly Addressed (2) — The criterion is insufficiently met. The aspect of the paper being evaluated shows a basic or flawed understanding, with significant gaps or errors that impact its effectiveness or
relevance.
Not Addressed (1) — The criterion is not met at all. The aspect of the paper being evaluated either does not address the required concept or is so poorly executed that it fails to convey any meaningful
understanding or application.
Mostly
Fully Partially Poorly Not Addressed
CRITERIA Addressed (5)
Addressed
Addressed (3) (Addressed) (2) (1)
Score
(5)
TITLE
The title succinctly encapsulates the study's main purpose or problem, clearly conveying the essence
of the research in a concise manner.
CHAPTER I
Rationale
The rationale cogently articulates the necessity and importance of the study. It clearly 1) identifies
the research gap, 2) succinctly states the research problem, and 3. outlines the research
objectives, effectively setting the stage for the study's relevance and purpose.
Statement of the Problem
The statement of the problem is articulated with clarity and precision, making it specific and
researchable. It delineates the primary issue and related sub-issues the study seeks to explore,
providing a focused direction for the research.
Hypotheses
The hypotheses are formulated with clarity, offering testable predictions that are directly aligned
with the research objectives and questions. They articulate the anticipated relationships or outcomes
between the study's variables in a concise and logical manner.
Objectives
The objectives are explicitly stated, demonstrating clarity and feasibility. They outline the study's
intended achievements and its potential contributions to existing knowledge or practice, reflecting a
clear roadmap for the research.
Research Questions
The research questions are distinct, targeted, and investigable. They effectively guide the study's
direction and scope, ensuring alignment with the research objectives and hypotheses, and framing
the inquiry in a structured manner.
Assumptions
The assumptions are logically presented, reasonable, and consistent with the study's research
problem and objectives. They acknowledge the underlying conditions or factors presumed to be true
in the context of the study.
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The scope and limitations are explicitly delineated and rationalized. This section clarifies the extent
and boundaries of the study, acknowledging any potential constraints that might impact the validity
or generalizability of the findings.
Significance of the Study
The significance of the study is compellingly conveyed and substantiated with evidence. It
elucidates the anticipated benefits and contributions of the research, highlighting its relevance and
value to various stakeholders and fields of interest.
Definition of Terms
The definition of terms is precise, accurate, and comprehensive. It elucidates the meanings
and contexts of key terms and concepts utilized in the study, ensuring clarity and understanding for
the reader.
Comments and Suggestions:
Total Score
CHAPTER II
Review of Related Literature
The review of related literature is meticulously structured and exhaustive, encompassing NO LESS
THAN 30 pertinent and recent scholarly works and studies (local and international) that directly
relate to the research problem and objectives. It goes beyond mere coverage, offering critical
analysis and synthesis of the sources, thereby elucidating a distinct research gap or providing a
compelling justification for the study.
Conceptual Framework
The conceptual framework is presented with clarity and logical coherence, aligning seamlessly with
the research problem and objectives. It effectively illustrates the interplay between the variables and
constructs relevant to the study, offering both a theoretical underpinning and a visual guide that
elucidates the study's structure and approach.
Comments and Suggestions:
Total Score
CHAPTER III
Research Design
The research design is appropriate and suitable for the research problem and
objectives. It describes the type, approach, and method of the study. It explains the
rationale and justification for choosing the research design.
Data Gathering Method
The method gathering of data is appropriate and suitable for the research problem
and objectives. It describes the type, source, and quality of the data that will be
collected. It explains how the data will be obtained, recorded, and stored.
Sampling Technique
The sampling technique is appropriate and suitable for the research problem and
objectives. It describes the population, sample size, sampling frame, and sampling
method of the study. It explains how the sampling technique will ensure the
representativeness and generalizability of the study.
Statistical Treatment
The statistical treatment is appropriate and suitable for the research problem and
objectives. It describes the type, level, and test of the data analysis that will be
performed. It explains how the statistical treatment will address the research
questions and hypotheses.
Comments and Suggestions:
Total Score
________________________________________________
Rater
FEDERICO A. ESTIPONA MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL | Laguinbanwa, Mandaon, Masbate | ____________,
2024
RATING SHEET | RE SE ARCH P RE SE NTAT IO N (P RO P O SAL DE F E NSE ; CH AP T E RS
1 -3)
Research Title: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Proponents: _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Instructions: Rate the oral presentation using the following rubrics. Place a checkmark (/) in the cell that corresponds to your rating on each item.
Above Below
Excellent Average Poor
Criteria Average Average Score
(5) (3) (1)
(4) (2)
Language Use and Delivery: The student communicates ideas effectively
Effectively uses eye contact.
Speaks clearly, effectively, and confidently using suitable volume and space.
Fully engages the audience.
Dresses appropriately.
Selects rich and varied words for context and uses correct grammar.
PowerPoint Presentation Design, Layout, Content and Information
The PowerPoint slides have a clear and consistent design and layout. The slides use appropriate font size,
colors, backgrounds, and themes. The slides are well-organized, balanced, and easy to read.
The PowerPoint slides have relevant and accurate content and information. The slides provide sufficient
details and examples to support the main points. The slides use clear and concise language and avoid
unnecessary jargon.
Organization and Preparation: The student exhibits logical organization.
Introduces the topic clearly and creatively.
Maintains clear focus on the topic.
Effectively includes smooth transitions to connect key points.
Ends with a logical, effective, and relevant conclusion.
Questions and Answers
Demonstrates extensive knowledge of the topic by responding confidently, precisely, and appropriately
to all audience questions and feedback.
Comments and Suggestions:
________________________________________________
Rater