Control Systems
Control Systems
Control Systems
EEE F242
H.V.D Sir
& Important Laplace Transform Formulae
#
f(t)
#
-
u(t) or 1
I Laplace transform is
t
A used to solve complex
S
n !
equations .
th
gn
+ 1
By taking Laplace transforms
W we can convert differential
Sin wt
S'+w equations to
algebraic
S
polynomials .
This helps
coswt
S + w2
to order
us salve
higher
1
ent S-w
differential equations
- impulse
fit) 1
if input varies
linearly the output also
· Linear
system -> ,
changes linearly
·
Time Invariant
system -> does not
depend on the time at
which
input is
applied
we will
mostly deal with Linear time Invaliant (LTE) systems
o/
system i/P sys
h(t) ~ e
⑧
- -
x(x)h(t- es)
: I
=
.......
-
↓ X
input at t 0
shifted only possible
=
->
.. y(t =
x(z) h(t -
z) < CONVOLUMON
e
↓ T = 0 ↓ ↳ impulse
/P
%
i/p response
obtain
On
taking Laplace Transform ,
we
H(s)
H(s) -> transfer
y (S) =
X(s) -
↓ function
of impulse response
([i/py
Fourier Transform
= =
·
x(w) =
doesn't if not
· Fourier transform at
give a solution Its das
converge ·
eg .
2
jut of
=
I eat , It
1j -a jw)t
(e-
+
solution 18 a
jw)t
get
+
a
-
->
-
When >a we
, -
2
jw)
:
⑧
x (s) =
juct) est dt ->
- >
Laplace Transform
while s =
- +
jw of x(t)
↳ 0 When no
dampening
HIS)= (S-a)(s-b)
·
Transfer function
(S 2)(s -d)
-
here S = a ,
b - zeroes of the
transfer function
S =
c ,
d > Poles
of the
Hansfu function
Translational Mechanical System
degree of freedom
:
· One
Free
body diagram Laplace Transformed
x(t) >x(t) >x(s)
"
-
E
kx(t) < kx(s) <
esse
M > f(t) f. d M > f(t) frs X(s) <
M
> F(s)
Md <
Ms X(s) <
Opposing
fr
If frSXS) kXCS) FIS)
Mdn(t) fra f(t) MSX(s) +
=
kat=
+
farce to displacement
+
at
inertial mass (F =
mas
due to
1
o/P
415)
Tramsful function
- -
is
:
-
MS2 + frS + h
esse
I fre ↑ fre
For Mi
[M ,
5 + (fr ,
+
fry)s +
(k , +
kz)] X , 13) -
(fr,s +
kn) X21s) =
F(s)
For Mr :
(fVzs +
k2)X , (3)
+
[M25 + (fvz +
f(z)s +
(k +
k3)]X2(5) =
0
Transfer function
:
:.
coeff of X, 15) cauff of XIS)
in M , (s) in M , (5)
Xcls) (fVzs +
(2) -
Xe(s)
cauff of
- caff of XIS]
=
F(S) in M2CS]
in Mc(s)
Rotational Mechanical System
Torque -
Angular Impedance
Displacement
(t) k0(t) ↳
Spring T(t) =
torsion
E si)
Throughout
nfacto yac
D
e -
2
in
⑤
For J,:
(5 ,
52 + D, s +
t, (0 , (5) -
k0 , 1s)= + (5)
For J2 :
-
k0 , (5) + (525 +
Des +
k2) 01S) =
0
Oc(s) k
Transfor function
=
T(S)
electricstems
Block Diagram Reduction
Input output
If MIs) wasn't present
R(S) Els) ((S)
⑱
G(s)
Transfu function
>
⑳
~I ↑) take off
point <(S)
BI
IS q(S) =
((S) =
E(S) R(S)
is
transfor function
:
-
(R)s) = <(S) HCS)) G(s)
((S)
R(S)
=
1
G(s)
= G(s)H(s)
=isness
· in series/cascade ·
In parallel
4
C I
R
>
- -
+
7 41 42 43 - 42 >
-
43 7
N
N
R C C
R
- G, 42 43 - - 4, +
G2 -
43 -
f ro m before gain
R C =
R4
R c =
R4 G ·
· 4
-
#
<y =
R
I
[
Y =
R
- vice versa
R R c R4
c R4
=
4
=
4 ⑧
I
I
[ -
G
y R4
=
<
y R4
=
·
shifting the
summing point
from
R4 I X
=
2
R
- > 4
R4 I X
=
2
R I
> 4 >
I
->
-
x x I
a X
- vice versa
R4 = XG R4 = x4
=
c
=
c R
R - 4 >
- >4 I
I
->
-
G
a X
a X
"
> Gi >
G2 7 Gu > >
x
>
-
=> -8 > ⑧ ⑧ ⑧
43
I
< H1
L
-
H1
<
- 1 ↑
with a node
Each
summing point & take
off point is replaced
elements
Each node is a summation
of incoming
y ,
=
x
-24 ·Ys
=
G242 + 4342 - H:
Yy
G, y, · Yu Guys
·
=
yz =
mode
output
i =
1
crossing a
-1- (I
loop gain)
more than once
-
I now touching loops) -
[(3 now
touching loops)
[ (4 now
touching loops)
-
+ . . . . .
,
5
Find
transfor
the
-n function
1
1 43
- -
·
⑧
au
⑧ ⑳
-
R C
G2
E < -
H1
-
H2
->
-
N =
2
,
Two forward paths
,
5
-n
in series
R
↳
. an
·
1
-
C
T =
G, G2 Gs Gy ->
IHz
< -
H1 X
1st
gain
forward
of
path sain of and path
3 loops present
= Hi Gu 22 =
-
H243 ; 23 =
- H3
↳
-
;
>45
43
mode
-
↳3 n
·
· ⑧ -
R au C
↳I
↳
hence touching
< H1
En
-
21 L & Les
touching loops
:
a now
:
O
3 non
touching loops
-
=>
1 -
( +
2 +
(3) +
(42 +
2) -
0
i
->
from , if any loop touches it path ,
make it 0
=
1 -
0 =
1
1
2
=
2 -
(2 +
(3) +
(213)
↳ ↳, mode common
cannot exist
always exist in
pais i.e
only I
complex pole
real
:For a 1st order
system , poles are
always
a/sta
· For a step input if transfer func is
, find response
time domain
Step (u(t))
in
is
-> Input
->
= a
(IS) =
a
* Is in racace domain
=
15
= a
-
35 +
a)
<(1) =
<"[CCs)Y =
<"[stay= 2"
(5 Ea] -
- at
. c(t) = 1 -
e
-
-
should be on the
* For
any
stable
system ,
the
poles always
left side
of the
yanis
in
-plane
·
((t) = -
e
>
- .
of a
=
=
If Ha
=
55 -
system
Sheggish
system
reaches 98 %
·
I - output
10 % 90 %
·
Rise time -> Time it takes for system
to
go from to
Tr = 2
-
. 2
a Output
act Only
this
x
Response of a
-> L-e-at
type of response
-
order
first system is possible
-
t >
Step response
in the
damping/decay output
is
· Fol a
purly complex pole ,
the step response oscillatory .
41S) 9 S
eg
W
.
=
92 + 9
<(t) =
1- cos3t
-
polys
=
Ij3 .
2k , t
b
-
a
eg
.
both real
poles k,, + 7
=
-
·
If 415) =
5 + as +
b
CCH-1-cost
0 (15) ss -> poles=Ijfb +
1fa
=
=
=
Wn=is t Wi =
b
excillations
frequency of
:
... natural
F
West q
- +
S
:G (s)
=
= =>
Damping
Ratio :
Es= of pole -
a =
2 WnEs
2W
Wn
Wi
: G(s) =
S+ 2EgWns+Wi
polls S,
EgWnI We -1
=
0 =
Eg = 1 Complex Undurdamped Oscillation
2 real poles at
1 critically damped
same
point
1 Oscillation
E =
I real Overdamped
·
For an overdamped & critically damped system ,
the
response
is like 1st order
system :it behaves like
1
st ordel
& 2 2
:
Rise time Tr =
.
a 'can be replaced
EgWn
with real palt of
is t
Time
settling poll' Wn' the
!
> We
sel" will be close to
accurate
=2 1 tolanc
%
*
Underdemuped system
mean ene
e5wnt
:
Step response
Mr
<(t) 2 Sin Welt +O
-
=
1 -
>
.
Wat We 1-5 ;
O=
tan")
Rise time Tr= is
Fron
· :
=
for undudamped
it is 0 % -> 100 %
Es
Peak Time Tp
we-si
-
=
·% overshoot=e
1 -
As the
pole location
changes from 1+ 2 +
3: (horizontally)
Ol
increases
En coordinate magnitude
-
⑧ ⑧
time decreases
setting
· overshoot decreases /: tano dechases)
in
you add
the
· When a zero
transfer func
Wn(s+a)
4291
-
=
152 + 24Wns+wn
It simplifies to
Scales the
->
e response
c'(s) = Sc(x) +
ac(s)
-
↓
in the
derivative -> affects only
transient stati
Hence
-
,
adding a zo
only scales the response
its nature
- does not
change
Third Order System
second order
:
· When
you
add a pole to a
system complex paurs
poles↑
as in
be exist
can
only -
added to real
(S) Wi axis
El
q
I
(s +
, wns
25
+
=>
a(s) =
RCs) +
RIS)
*
I
·
a
(S A)
⑧
+
ke
- At
=> :CH =
( ) +
e
-
> damping
x
If the new pole is at a distance greater than 5a from
& the
the original poles ,
it can be
ignored system can be
4(5) = (S a)(s b)
+
+
=
ab(1 + +,
5)(1 +
Tes)
=
↓ (1 +
Sti)(1 + Stz) . . .
(S + 2) (s +
d) cd(1 +
Ts) (1+ Tus) 5 (1 +
at
Type O
system
-> n = o -> 0 poles origin
Type I
system ->n= 1 -
I pole at origin
SECs)
-
ecor= elt) It
Steady state whil elt) Wit) ((t)
If =
-
· =
t -
es
S -
0 input output
· RIS) (2S)
G
=
>
-- a
=
=
state eva E(s) RIS) s
Steady
-
=
:
ess= see
· For a Type O
system RCS) =
Als
e > a Step
91s) = lest s
A
input
ess =
s =
SAS =ass" r
R(S) =
Er
- a
samp
input ess=
et Sx =
S
S- O
1 +
>
parabolic
a(s) =
Es
i
ess =
It a
=
Input Type O
Type 1 Type 2
A
Step C -
1 +
k
A
samp 0 ⑨
-
A
parabolic 0 0
-
k
Sensitivity
does
CT/
How T
change
o Ite
T
Sa -
= on
changing I is the
SF/z sensitivity
2 4
= =
· - -
S =
I = 1 : + =
4 = :
4
T =
=
=
=4
- X
-
S Get
sensitive
a te
C
=
feedback
systems an prefund
(4 C :
=1)
=
<
↓
men towards left
I
For positive feedback T -> poll--ath mal
=
-
S + a -
k towards right
(may class origin)
Hence
negative feelback loops all more stable than positive
-
fudback
-
used in oscillators
used in
amplifies