Morphological Variation in The Structure of The Jugular Foramen in Adult Human Dried Skull in North India
Morphological Variation in The Structure of The Jugular Foramen in Adult Human Dried Skull in North India
Morphological Variation in The Structure of The Jugular Foramen in Adult Human Dried Skull in North India
ABSTRACT Jugular foramen being difficult to approach surgically, a detailed morphological and anatomical knowledge
of it is required. 100 dried adult human skulls were examined. The foramen was larger on right side in 74%,
on left side in19% and equal in both sides in 7% cases. 68% skulls had complete septation on right and 21% on left side whereas
32% contained partial sepatation on right and 79% on left side respectively. Dome was found bilaterally, on right side only, on left
side only and absent on both sides in 48%, 30%, 10% and 12% of the cases respectively. The mean±standard deviation of APD on
the right and left sides were 6.92±1.53mm and 8.1±1.49 mm while the TVD measured 12.9±3.37 mm and 13.0±3.53 on the right and
left respectively. APD was significantly greater on right side (p<0.0001) and showed significant positive correlation with that of left.
Similar was the case with TVD.
Variety of lesion may occur in the JF, arising from the structures Min Max Mean ±SD
normally found within the JF or from contiguous structures [8]. Diameter (mm) (mm) (µ±sd)
The most common tumours or lesions include glomus jugulare
tumours, neuroma, meningomas, metastatic carcinoma, chron-
APDR 4.5 10.7 6.92 ± 1.53
droma, nasopharynx carcinoma & carcinoma of tympanic cavity
[9]. Schwannoma (neuroma) represents approximately 7–10%
Min Max Mean ±SD occipito-temporal suture. The temporal side of the foramen is
Diameter (mm) (mm) (µ±sd) the jugular fossa (bulb), bounded superiorly by the bony floor
of the middle ear. The glomus jugulare lies in the fossa or middle
ear near the fossa and the glomus tumor arises in this area [11].
APDL 4.2 10.5 8.1 ± 1.49
In this study, 100 skulls were analysed for their size, length,
width, presence of dome and septation. Predominance of JF was
TVDR 5.3 19.8 12.9 ± 3.37 on the right side (74%) with maximum cases of complete septa-
tion (68%). Most of the skulls showed to have dome bilaterally
(48%).
TVDL 5.1 19.9 13.0 ± 3.53
R. R. Sturrock found that in 69% of cases the right JF was larger
SD→standard deviation than the left and in 23% the left JF was larger, with the remain-
der being of equal size. A dome caused by a superior jugular
Table 2. Comparison of APD of Right and Left side bulb was present bilaterally in 54%, on the right only in 30%,
on the left only in 6% and was absent bilaterally in 10% of the
Side Mean (µ) SD p cases. Incomplete septation was present on the right in 1.3%
and on the left in 10.9% of cases. A complete division was found
APDR 8.096 mm 1.478 <0.0001* in 3.2% of cases for both the right and left sides [12].
APDL 6.917 mm 1.519 In a study of M. Tahir. Hatiboglu etal 61.6% cases had larger
foramen the right side and 26% on the left side with the remain-
*→statistically significant (p<0.05) der being of almost equal size in both the sides. Dome was pre-
sent bilaterally in 49%, on the right only in 36%, on the left only
Table 3. Comparison of TVD of Right and Left side in 4.6%, it was absent bilaterally in 10.3%. Complete bony sep-
tation occurred in 5.6% on the right and in 4.3% on the left, par-
Side Mean (µ) SD p tial septation was observed in 2.6% on the right and in 19.6%
TVDR 12.921 mm 3.257 0.9661 on the left. Another foramen which was completely separated
by a spicule of bone and which transmits the inferior petrosal
TVDL 13.01 mm 3.508 sinus was present in 5.6% of skulls on the right and in 4.6% on
the left [13]. Patel MM etal observed the presence of gutter on
Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and p value the lateral side of jugular foramen. This study postulates the hy-
pothesis that the presence of size of gutter is inversely propor-
APD TVD tional with the size of dome and helps in accommodating the
SN variable right APD left right TVD left superior jugular bulb of internal jugular vein [14].
APD r 0.228 0.102 -0.014 The size and shape of the jugular foramen is related to the size
1 right - of the internal jugular vein and the presence or absence of a
p 0.022* 0.313 0.917
prominent superior bulb. The right foramen is usually larger
r 0.228 -0.006 0.042 than the left. There is a very wide variation in the anatomy of
2 APD left - the intra cranial venous sinuses which accounts for variation in
p 0.022* 0.98 0.967 size and shape of jugular foramen. The difference in size of the
r 0.102 -0.006 0.589 two internal jugular veins is already visible in the human em-
3 TVD - bryo at the 23mm stage and probably results from differences in
right p 0.313 0.98 0.001* the pattern of development of the right and left brachiocephalic
r -0.014 0.042 0.589 veins [2]. The larger superior sagittal sinus continues in suc-
4 TVD left - cession as right transverse sinus, right sigmoid sinus and right
p 0.917 0.967 0.001* internal jugular vein whereas the smaller inferior sagittal sinus
continues in succession as straight sinus, left transverse sinus,
*→statistically significant (p<0.05) left sigmoid sinus and into left internal jugular vein [15].
Table 5. Presence of dome in jugular The bony growth reduces the size of JF and jugular fossa. It
might cause the neurovascular symptoms which can mimic the
Dome Bilateral Right Left Absent symptoms caused by jugular meningiomas, glomus jugulare tu-
Percentage 48% 30% 10% 12% mors of choleastatoma. The bony growth in the jugular fossa re-
gion might compress the superior bulb of internal jugular vein
Table 6. Size of the jugular foramen which in turn might result in venous congestion in the cranial
cavity. The compression of 9th 10th and 11thnerves might re-
Size percentage sult in paralysis of pharynx, larynx and palate [16].
Right>Left 74%
Conclusion
Left>Right 19% The surgical anatomy of the JF and its contents is complex.
Therefore, an excellent knowledge of its variations and the rela-
Right=Left 7% tionships between its neurovascular structures is critical when
surgically approaching this complex area, in order to maximize
Table 7. Septation of jugular foramen the surgical outcome and decrease postoperative complications
when treating the pathology of this region.
Side Complete (%) Partial (%)
Right 68% 32%
Left 21% 79%
Discussion
The JF is one of the most complicated anatomic structures of the
skull base. It is bounded by the temporal and occipital bones. It
is an aperture between the medial and lateral portions of the
REFERENCE Standring, S; 2008; Head and Neck. In: Susan Standring (ed). Gray’s Anatomy.40th edition. Churchill Livingstone. (Edinburgh, London, Newyork,
Oxford, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto.); 415- 31. | Saheb H.S., Mavishetter G. F, Thomas ST, Prasanna LC, Murlidhar P; 2010; Morphologi-
cal variations in the structure of the jugular foramen of the human skulls of south India; Biomedical Research:21(4) : 349-50. | Miljenko S & Damir P ; 1973; Variations in shape and
dimensions of sigmoid groove, venous portion of jugular foramen, jugular fossa, condylar and mastoid foramina classified by age, sex and body side; Zeitschrift für Anatomie und
Entwicklungsgeschichte; Vol140 , 319-35. | Linn J, Peters F, Moriggl B, Naidich TP, Bruckmann H, Yousry I; 2009; The Jugular Foramen; Imaging Strategy and Detailed Anatomy at
3T; Am J Neuroradiol; 30:34–41. | Mattos J.P & Ramina R, Borges W, Ghizoni E, Fernandes Y B, Paschoal JR, Honorato DC, Borges G; 2004; Intradural Jugular Foramen Tumor; 4Arq
Neuropsiquiatr; 62(4):997-1003. | Inserra M.M. & Pfister M., Jackler RK 2004; Anatomy involved in the jugular foramen approach for jugulo tympanic paraganglioma resection:
Neurosurg Focus 17 (2):E6, 41-4. | Kapakin S; 2011; An unusual anatomic variation of the jugular foramen with doubled posterior condylar canal; Int. J. Morphol., 29(4):1186-8 |
Caldemeyer KS, Mathews VP, Azarrelli B, Smith RR; 1997; The Jugular Foramen; A Review Of Anatomy , Masses And Imaging Characterstics : Radiographics; 17;1123-39. | Ugur E,
Yavuz U, Cakir B, Yalcin AU, Kokaogullar; 1993; Infratemporal Approach For Jugular Foramen Meningioma; Turkish Neurosurgery 3, 128-33 | Manzoor A , Rizwan M.B, Ahmed N;
2009; Jugular Foramen Schwannoma—A Very Rare Entity: J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 21(2),174-5 | Kim S.KY, and Capp M.P; Jugular Foramen And Early Roentgen Diagnosis Of
Glomus Jugulare Tumor, 7( 3), 597-600 | Sturrock R.R; 1988; Variations in the structure of the jugular foramen of the human skull; J.Anat;160: 227-30. | Hatiboglu M.T and Afitap
A ; 1992; Structural variations in the jugular foramen of the human skull; J.Anat;180: 191-6. | Patel M.M. & Singel T.C. ; 2007; Variations in the structure of the jugular foramen of
the human skulls in Saurashtra Region; J.Anat.Soc.India; 56(2) : 34 -7. | Sethi R & Singh V, Kaul V.N; 2011; Morphological Variations of a jugular foramen in North Indian Human
Adult Skulls;Indian journal of otology; 17(1), 14-6 | Satheesha N; 2008; Partial obstruction of jugular foramen by abnormal bone growth at jugular fossa: The Internet Journal of
Biological Anthropology; 1 (2), 10