DNV CG 0063
DNV CG 0063
DNV CG 0063
The content of this service document is the subject of intellectual property rights reserved by DNV AS (“DNV”). The user
accepts that it is prohibited by anyone else but DNV and/or its licensees to offer and/or perform classification, certification
and/or verification services, including the issuance of certificates and/or declarations of conformity, wholly or partly, on the
basis of and/or pursuant to this document whether free of charge or chargeable, without DNV’s prior written consent. DNV
is not responsible for the consequences arising from any use of this document by others.
The PDF electronic version of this document available at the DNV website dnv.com is the official version. If there
are any inconsistencies between the PDF version and any other available version, the PDF version shall prevail.
DNV AS
FOREWORD
DNV class guidelines contain methods, technical requirements, principles and acceptance criteria
related to classed objects as referred to from the rules.
This service document has been prepared based on available knowledge, technology and/or information at the time of issuance of this
document. The use of this document by other parties than DNV is at the user's sole risk. Unless otherwise stated in an applicable contract,
or following from mandatory law, the liability of DNV AS, its parent companies and subsidiaries as well as their officers, directors and
employees (“DNV”) for proved loss or damage arising from or in connection with any act or omission of DNV, whether in contract or in tort
(including negligence), shall be limited to direct losses and under any circumstance be limited to 300,000 USD.
CHANGES – CURRENT
Changes - current
This document supersedes the April 2016 edition of DNVGL-CG-0063.
The numbering and/or title of items containing changes is highlighted in red.
Rebranding to DNV All This document has been revised due to the rebranding of DNV
GL to DNV. The following have been updated: the company
name, material and certificate designations, and references to
other documents in the DNV portfolio. Some of the documents
referred to may not yet have been rebranded. If so, please see
the relevant DNV GL document. No technical content has been
changed.
Editorial corrections
In addition to the above stated changes, editorial corrections may have been made.
DNV AS
CONTENTS
Contents
Changes – current.................................................................................................. 3
Section 1 Introduction............................................................................................ 5
1 Classification........................................................................................5
Section 2 Definitions............................................................................................... 6
1 Contractual shock level....................................................................... 6
2 Main functions..................................................................................... 6
3 Essential machinery and craft piping systems..................................... 6
4 Other essential systems...................................................................... 6
5 Important equipment.......................................................................... 6
6 Shock response spectra....................................................................... 7
Section 3 Scope.......................................................................................................8
1 General................................................................................................ 8
Changes – historic................................................................................................ 15
DNV AS
SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION
Section 1
1 Classification
When exposed to non-contact shock loads such as, but not limited to, underwater explosions from
depth charges, naval ships run the risk of significant losses of operational effectiveness, mainly due to
malfunctioning of systems caused by individual equipment failures.
This class guideline is intended to provide guidance on how to carry out relevant shock testing.
In addition, the user or owner may require defined operational functions to be verified to sustain defined
shock levels. The functions may be broken down to a level so that it can be confirmed that all systems and
equipment required for that function satisfy the requirement.
DNV AS
SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS
Section 2
1 Contractual shock level
Shock design loads specified by the customer (yard or owner). The contractual shock level, as used in the
system and component design, is represented by a shock response spectrum.
Normally one or two shock levels are specified based on the required shock protection of the different
equipment on-board.
2 Main functions
The main functions are defined in DNV-RU-SHIP Pt.1 Ch.1 Table 2 Definitions.
5 Important equipment
Equipment, which need not necessarily be in continuous operation for maintaining the craft's
manoeuvrability, but which is necessary to maintain the crafts main functions.
DNV AS
Examples of important equipment are:
Section 2
— fuel oil transfer pumps
— starting air compressors
— bilge and ballast pumps
— fire pumps
— ventilation fans for engine and boiler rooms
— side-thrusters
— converters, transformers and generators for supplying such equipment.
DNV AS
SECTION 3 SCOPE
Section 3
1 General
All essential machinery, craft piping systems, other essential systems, important equipment and control and
monitoring equipment shall be designed and supported to resist the contractual shock level.
These systems and important equipment as defined above shall withstand the contractual shock level
without:
— suffering serious degradation of functionality during and after the shock loading or
— experience permanent degradation of foundation and fastenings or
— have serious change of alignment.
The level of functionality may include acceptable damage, which shall be agreed upon by the involved
parties, beforehand. This may incorporate:
— no degradation and fully functional; "shock grade 1"
For all parts of the equipment which are necessary for the ship's safety and fulfilment of its combat task.
Full function during and after shock load without reduction of performance. No loosening of parts which
could endanger crew or other equipment of “shock grade 1”
— must remain safe; "shock grade 2".
All other parts of the equipment which are not essential for safety and fulfilment of combat task. No
loosening of parts which could endanger crew or equipment of “shock grade 1”. Compliance with these
requirements shall be documented by calculation or through shock testing. This class guideline deals with
acceptable principles of shock testing in a laboratory environment, but does not deal with full-scale shock
testing of an entire ship.
DNV AS
SECTION 4 SHOCK TESTING
Section 4
1 General
It is important that the test method, the shock load and the response(s) are all clearly related to an
acceptable standard and severity level before qualification tests are carried out.
2 Recognised standards
The following standards are typically used in shock testing:
i) Appendix C of ANSI S2.14-1973:
"Methods for specifying the performance of shock machines”.
ii) Appendix B and Appendix C of IEC 68-2-27: 1987:
"Basic environmental testing procedures Part 2. Tests – Test EA and guidance: Shock”.
iii) Annex B of ISO 8568- 1989(E):
“Mechanical shock – Testing Machines – characteristics and performance”.
iv) STANAG 4549: NATO Standard:
“Testing of surface ship equipment on shock testing machines”.
Note:
Many of the technical reference in this class guideline are based on an approach described in STANAG 4549.
Other standards, like MIL-S-901, BV 0430, BV 0230 / D5050-0599 may upon consideration of applicability be used.
---e-n-d---o-f---n-o-t-e---
3 Shock levels
Typically a range of shock levels may be defined by idealised shock response spectra. A number of navies
have different design philosophies, which may take into account location of equipment on board (i.e. shock
zones) or other parameters.
Testing is normally to be based on a defined shock level specified in terms of a shock response spectrum.
One acceptable definition of shock level is defined in STANAG 4549. In this standard, the required shock
response spectrum level is defined by relative displacement, pseudo velocity and absolute acceleration
within certain frequency bands, and are shown as three intersecting straight lines in a log-amplitude vs
log frequency diagram. Such a shock response spectrum is denoted as NS ([Relative displacement – mm];
2
[Pseudo velocity – m/s]; [absolute acceleration – m/s ]).
Example:
NS (0.035; 3.5; 1250) means a shock response spectrum with:
— 35 mm relative displacement between 4.0 Hz and 15.9 Hz
— 3.5 m/s pseudo velocity between 15.9 Hz and 56.8 Hz and
2
— ~125 g (1250 m/s ) absolute acceleration between 56.8 Hz and 400 Hz.
Other approaches than defined in STANAG 4549 may be accepted upon consideration.
Acceptable approaches may include but not be limited to:
— a time domain approach
— a charge of X kg explosive of type Q at a distance of Y meters and a depth of Z meters.
DNV AS
It is not required to use a shock-testing machine, which has been certified for such application. However,
Section 4
where such testing machine is not used, well defined shock loads measurements must be made prior to the
acceptance tests at locations close to the attachment points of the equipment. The measurements must show
that the corresponding shock level is equal to or exceeds the level specified for the test.
5 Test mounting
Test of equipment shall also include the mounting arrangement with which the equipment is attached to its
foundation. Where such mountings are not part of the equipment delivery, the mounting arrangement shall
be simulated during testing.
When such an arrangement, i.e. the equipment on mountings, has completed the shock testing, the
equipment without mountings or on another type of mounting shall not be considered certified without
separate testing.
The test arrangement should simulate as closely as possible the final intended application. If cabling or piping
represent a significant effect on stiffening, this should also be simulated during the shock testing.
Wherever possible the equipment has to be in operation mode during the test and the functions have to be
checked during and after the test.
If, because of limitations of the test facility, it is not possible to test resiliently mounted equipment together
with the mountings, these shall be tested on fixed support using the residual shock above the mounting as
derived by calculations.
If it is not possible to test the full equipment assembly, as a minimum, the most critical components, as
agreed between the navy and the Society, shall be tested.
6 Test procedure
Case 1 Applies if there is only a single orientation on board possible, which is fully known.
Case 2 Applies if it is only clear that the topside of the equipment points upwards (here the X-axis) in all cases. This is
the most common case, in particular for smaller equipment.
Case 3 Applies to a few pieces of equipment, which can be mounted in any orientation.
Case 2 and in particular case 3 require more severe overall testing than case 1.
DNV AS
Section 4
7 Meeting the required test severity
---e-n-d---o-f---n-o-t-e---
DNV AS
Section 4
7.4 Tolerances
Tolerances shall be in accordance with the shock test standard used.
DNV AS
SECTION 5 CERTIFICATION PROCESS
Section 5
1 General procedure
Typical certification will normally involve the following parties:
Navy (owner) The navy will specify the required shock level with reference to a recognised standard. Any acceptable
reduction in functionality following shock should also be specified.
Shipyard The shipyard will order equipment from a manufacturer with these specified shock requirements.
Shipyard will maintain all certificates for purchased equipment for review by class representative
at the shipyard. Information on orientation of equipment, required direction of testing and required
functionality after shock testing should be agreed with navy and class. This information should be a
part of the specification to the equipment manufacturer.
Manufacturer The equipment manufacturer will design and manufacture equipment according to the specification.
The manufacturer will normally issue a data book for his equipment accompanied by relevant
certificates, including the shock test certificate.
Test laboratory The test agency or laboratory will carry out shock testing of the equipment. Based on results of testing
the test agency or laboratory will normally issue a test report documenting test procedure and test
results.
Class Class will verify shock testing at test laboratory and issue to the test laboratory a certificate of
compliance. Where equipment is also subject to certification as a result of other class requirements
than shock testing, class will also carry out relevant certification at the manufacturer.
Communication between the various parties will be necessary in order to ensure that the delivered product
meets the project specifications.
Note that the certificate will document a certain shock resistance. However, suitability of the equipment for a
specific application should also consider the following:
a) If the equipment is on mountings during the tests, the same type mountings shall be used in the final
application. The mounting arrangement and relevant effects of any other attached equipment will need
to be informed to the test agency or laboratory either by the manufacturer or the shipyard.
b) For the intended orientation on board, the relevant tests will have to be satisfied.
c) Acceptability of any possible damage, malfunction or degradation of performance as noted during testing
must be agreed upon.
d) The equipment being offered is of identical design and fabrication to that which is being tested.
A manufacturer or shipyard may in certain circumstances not have a specific application determined before
delivery. In such cases a standard shock level and testing in varying positions and directions may be
specified. Suitability for an application will then have to be determined when final project information is
available.
2 Documentation
DNV AS
— weight and overall dimensions
Section 5
— description of any mounting arrangement used to support the equipment.
Description of shock testing
— project reference and required shock level
— reference to recognised standard
— description of shock testing equipment
— certification or equivalent of shock testing equipment
— description of how equipment was mounted in the test machine
— location of measuring devices
— certification and calibration of measuring devices
— table showing the sequential numbered tests, test directions, test severity
— table showing shock response results.
Damage and performance tests
— definition of agreed acceptable degradation of functionality if agreed on previous to shock testing
— performance tests on equipment or any of its components, carried out during, or at the end of the tests
shall be described including all functions controlled and any changes in performance observed
— any damage that has occurred as a result of a shock test shall be noted.
Conclusions and comments
— test agency or laboratory’s conclusion regarding test results and acceptance criteria
— verified shock level with respect to recognised standard
— any comments deemed relevant.
---e-n-d---o-f---n-o-t-e---
DNV AS
CHANGES – HISTORIC
Changes – historic
April 2016 edition
This is a new document.
DNV AS
About DNV
DNV is the independent expert in risk management and assurance, operating in more than 100
countries. Through its broad experience and deep expertise DNV advances safety and sustainable
performance, sets industry benchmarks, and inspires and invents solutions.
Whether assessing a new ship design, optimizing the performance of a wind farm, analyzing sensor
data from a gas pipeline or certifying a food company’s supply chain, DNV enables its customers and
their stakeholders to make critical decisions with confidence.
Driven by its purpose, to safeguard life, property, and the environment, DNV helps tackle the
challenges and global transformations facing its customers and the world today and is a trusted
voice for many of the world’s most successful and forward-thinking companies.