Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    SPP Annex-3

    Uploaded by

    qcfqvj2jxp
    The document discusses different methods for selecting an architect for a project, including direct selection based on reputation or recommendation, comparative selection using a selection committee to evaluate qualifications, and architectural design competitions. It provides details on the processes involved in comparative selection and competitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    SPP Annex-3

    Uploaded by

    qcfqvj2jxp
    9 views1 page
    The document discusses different methods for selecting an architect for a project, including direct selection based on reputation or recommendation, comparative selection using a selection committee to evaluate qualifications, and architectural design competitions. It provides details on the processes involved in comparative selection and competitions.

    Original Description:

    spp3

    Original Title

    SPP ANNEX-3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses different methods for selecting an architect for a project, including direct selection based on reputation or recommendation, comparative selection using a selection committee to evaluate qualifications, and architectural design competitions. It provides details on the processes involved in comparative selection and competitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    9 views1 page

    SPP Annex-3

    Uploaded by

    qcfqvj2jxp
    The document discusses different methods for selecting an architect for a project, including direct selection based on reputation or recommendation, comparative selection using a selection committee to evaluate qualifications, and architectural design competitions. It provides details on the processes involved in comparative selection and competitions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    C.

    GENERAL NOTES ON THE


    SELECTION OF THE ARCHITECT
    (Part of the IRR of R.A. No. 9266, replacing the 1979 UAP Doc. 208)

    1. INTRODUCTION

    There are many ways by which a Client can engage the services of an Architect. The most
    appropriate method of selecting an Architect will depend on the type and complexity of the project.

    2. SCOPE OF SERVICES

    The scope of services will depend on the method by which the Architect is selected.

    3. METHODS OF SELECTION

    3.1. Direct Selection is used when undertaking a relatively small project. The Client selects his
    Architect on the basis of:

    3.1.1. Reputation

    3.1.2. Personal or business acquaintance or recommendation of a friend

    3.1.3. Recommendation of the Architect’s former Client

    3.1.4. Recommendation of another Architect.

    3.2. Comparative Selection may be conducted by committees representing institutions,


    corporations or public agencies. The selection process involves:

    3.2.1. Invitation. The Client issues an invitation which includes the Terms of Reference (ToR)
    for the project which is based on the Design Brief prepared by another Architect. The
    selection committee established by the Client may consist of representatives from other
    State-regulated professions and/or the construction industry, as well as persons with
    related expertise.

    3.2.2. Pre-qualification. Architects and/or PRC-registered Architectural Firms (AFs) submit


    information regarding their qualification and expertise.

    3.2.3. Interview. The Architect explains his methodology in translating the plan/design
    requirements of the proposed project.

    3.2.4. Verification. The selection committee may visit buildings designed by the Architects and
    check references such as former clients and financial institutions.

    3.2.5. Evaluation & Ranking. The selection committee may adopt its own procedure in
    evaluating the entries and recommending the most capable firm.

    3.2.6. Negotiation. The Architect explains to the Client the Scope of Services and the
    Architect’s Fee as prescribed under the Architect’s Guidelines.

    3.3. An Architectural Design Competition (ADC) is used for civic or monumental projects. The
    competition may either be an idea competition, design or design build competition. Various

    _____________________________________________________________________________
    Annex “A” 2010 Standards of Professional Practice (SPP) 3 of 4

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy