Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/22
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/22
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Sociology 9699/22
SOCIOLOGY 9699/22
Paper 2 The Family February/March 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report f or
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes f or the February/March 2024 series f or most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list -type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self -contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted)
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
• The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
• If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is s hown.
• Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
• Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary an d any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
• For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
• For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
• Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
Some of the questions are marked holistically using levels of response mark schemes. When marking
holistically, the marks awarded for an answer are usually based on a judgement of the overall quality
of the response.
For holistic marking, inevitably, the mark scheme cannot cover all responses that candidates may
make for all of the questions. In some cases, candidates may make some responses which the mark
scheme has not predicted. These answers should nevertheless be credited according to their quality.
Annotations
Annotation Meaning
Benefit of the doubt given / the point is just about worthy of credit
E2
Explanation of why it is a strength/ limitation
Evaluation point
Developed point
Juxtaposition of point
Repetition
Too vague
Incorrect response
Irrelevant material
On page comment
Annotation Meaning
Identification of a point
Indicative content
Reward a maximum of two ways. For each way, up to 2 marks are available:
(2 2 marks)
2(a) Explain two reasons for the increase in cohabitation in some societies. 8
Indicative content
1 mark for making a point / giving a reason (e.g. changing social attitudes).
1 mark for explaining that point (e.g. societies are increasingly becoming more
accepting of relationships outside of the traditional marriage).
1 mark for explaining how the material supports the point (e.g. as people
become less influenced by religious traditions, social attitudes towards living
together unmarried is less likely considered sinful).
(2 4 marks)
Indicative content
Limitations:
• Over-estimates the amount of people abandoning marriage.
• Exaggerates the extent of family diversity – the basic features of family
life are still modelled on the nuclear family.
• By focusing too much on individualism, it underestimates the importance
common norms & values have in family life.
• Exaggerates the role of choice in family diversity – some societies
actively prevent diversity through laws and religion/many types of
diversity may not have been a choice e.g. divorce, death of a partner,
migration.
• Fails to recognise the persistence of patriarchy/female oppression in
families (radical feminism criticism).
• Does not consider social structures e.g. social class, gender etc. in
shaping family form.
• Choice is often limited to affluent, more liberal western societies.
• Any other appropriate limitation.
1 mark for explaining why postmodernism has this limitation (e.g. assumes
people are no longer bound by traditional values and expectations).
1 mark for explaining why it is a limitation (e.g. Sommerville argues that only
5% of people will never marry in their lives).
• (2 3 marks)
3(a) 'Women continue to perform the majority of tasks in the family.' Explain 10
this view.
Indicative content
Levels of response
Level 0: 0 marks
• No response worthy of credit.
3(b) 'Women continue to perform the majority of tasks in the family.' Using 6
sociological material, give one argument against this view.
Indicative content
Levels of response
Level 0: 0 marks
• No response worthy of credit.
4 Evaluate the view that cultural factors are the main influence on family 26
structure.
Indicative content
4
In support of the view Against the view
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question
should be rewarded appropriately.
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
• Good knowledge and understanding of the view that cultural factors are
the main influence on family structure.
4 7–8
• The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
• Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that cultural factors are
the main influence on family structure.
2 • The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and 3–4
may include basic references to concepts or theories or research
evidence.
• Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that cultural factors are
the main influence on family structure.
1 1–2
• The response contains only assertive points or common-sense
observations.
• The material selected will be accurate and relevant but lacks either some
3 5–6
development or clear application to the question.
• There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this lacks focus
1 1–2
on or relevance to the specific question.
• Very good analysis/evaluation of the view that cultural factors are the
5 main influence on family structure. 9–10
• The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
• Some analysis/evaluation of the view that cultural factors are the main
influence on family structure.
3 • There is a juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are not 5–6
clearly focused on the question or a few simple points against that
cultural factors are the main influence on family structure
• Basic analysis/evaluation of the view that cultural factors are the main
influence on family structure.
2 • There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or one 3–4
simple point against that cultural factors are the main influence on family
structure.
5 Evaluate the view that the main role of the family is to serve ruling class 26
interests.
Indicative content
5
In support of the view Against the view
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question
should be rewarded appropriately.
Examiners should award up to 8 marks for AO1, up to 8 marks for AO2, and up to 10 marks for AO3.
4 • Good knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role of the 7–8
family is to serve ruling class interests.
• The response contains a range of detailed points with good use of
concepts and theory/research evidence.
3 • Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role 5–6
of the family is to serve ruling class interests.
• The response contains a narrow range of detailed points or a wider range
of underdeveloped points, with some use of concepts or theory or
research evidence.
2 • Basic knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role of the 3–4
family is to serve ruling class interests.
• The response contains a narrow range of underdeveloped points and
may include basic references to concepts or theories or research
evidence.
1 • Limited knowledge and understanding of the view that the main role of 1–2
the family is to serve ruling class interests.
• The response contains only assertive points or common-sense
observations.
4 • The material selected will be accurately interpreted, well developed and 7–8
consistently applied to answering the question
3 • The material selected will be accurate and relevant but lacks either some 5–6
development or clear application to the question.
2 • The material selected is relevant to the question but is not applied 3–4
accurately or has limited development.
1 • There is some attempt to apply sociological material but this lacks focus 1–2
on or relevance to the specific question.
5 • Very good analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family 9–10
is to serve ruling class interests.
• The evaluation is clear, explicit and sustained.
4 • Good analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family is to 7–8
serve ruling class interests.
• The evaluation is explicit and direct but not sustained or a more
descriptive account of evidence and arguments suggesting that the main
role of the family is not necessarily to serve ruling class interests.
3 • Some analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family is to 5–6
serve ruling class interests.
• There is a juxtaposition of different arguments and theories which are not
clearly focused on the question or a few simple points suggesting that the
main role of the family is not necessarily to serve ruling class interests.
2 • Basic analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family is to 3–4
serve ruling class interests.
• There is an attempt to consider more than one side of the debate or one
simple point suggesting that the main role of the family is not necessarily
to serve ruling class interests.
1 • Limited analysis/evaluation of the view that the main role of the family is 1–2
to serve ruling class interests.
• Any analysis or evaluation is incidental, confused or simply assertive.