Honkong
Honkong
Becoming Part of One National Economy: Maintaining Two Systems in The Midst
Student name:
Student id:
Mobile Number:
Reflection
products are traded since they may be done at arm's length and do not need considerable human
interaction. In contrast, service integration is considered deep integration since services are
conducted directly on individuals. Customers must either go to the producer's location directly in
the services industry, or producers must invest directly in another country to offer services there.
The services industry needs a high volume of face-to-face interactions. As a result of Hong
Kong's 1997 return to China, services have become more integrated and need more coordination
between Hong Kong and the rest of China. Not much progress was made in services integration
during the first five years of Hong Kong's return. The ruling elite was wary of the negative
effects of deep integration on Hong Kong's autonomy and international image. Only in January
2003, around five and a half years after Hong Kong's return to British rule, was a tiny but
significant step toward economic integration the 24-hour operation of a single passenger border
crossing between Hong Kong and the Mainland adopted (Sung, 2018).
Indeed, Since China's openness in 1979, the economic interdependence between the
Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong has been extraordinarily fast. Economic integration between
Hong Kong and the Mainland began due to market forces and was initially unplanned. By taking
advantage of reduced salaries and prices (Jones, 1999), Hong Kong's export-oriented
manufacturing businesses shifted over the border in large numbers, quickly building a global
factory in Guangdong that relied on Hong Kong for producer services. Hong Kong's
transformation from a labor-intensive manufacturing base to a global services center has been
remarkable (Sung, 2018). The Mainland and Hong Kong have become the most important
trading and investment partners for each other. Alternatively, the Mainland's early integration
3
with the global economy was confined to foreign investors who used the Mainland as a
In the early years of China's openness, Hong Kong played a significant role since it was
the primary middleman in China's foreign commerce and investment (Jitaru et al., 2017). A
Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Shenzhen, China, was designed expressly with Hong Kong in
mind to take advantage of the SEZ's many economic prospects. From 1997 to 2003, Hong
Kong's economy was in crisis and stagnated, whereas the Mainland's economy was rapidly
developing. To strengthen its economy, Hong Kong has to make changes to its policies in order
to take advantage of possibilities on the Mainland and leverage its relationships there. Economic
integration with the Pearl River Delta (PRD), the natural hinterland of Hong Kong and
Guangdong's primary economic area, was one of Hong Kong's policy goals.
When Hong Kong returned to China's control in 1997, the Basic Law, a mini-constitution
approved in April 1990, detailed the foundation for economic integration between Hong Kong
and the Mainland. International and national economic integration may be found in economic
integration under "One Country, Two Systems." If you look at Hong Kong and China as two
separate economies, the two economies seem to be intertwined rather than separate. Hong Kong
will keep its currency (the Hong Kong dollar) and central bank, allowing it to remain fiscally and
monetarily independent. To facilitate commerce, Hong Kong would remain a free port, a distinct
customs territory, and a World Trade Organization (WTO) member. Hong Kong would preserve
4
the free movement of capital with unfettered convertibility, no exchange restrictions, and its own
Additionally, Hong Kong will have its ship and plane registry. Economic integration
between Hong Kong and the Chinese Mainland is more difficult than among EU members
because of the "Two Systems" institutional framework. EU members share one common external
tariff and negotiate as one in international commerce. The European Union is a united customs
territory, but Hong Kong and the Mainland are independent customs territories with differing
external tariffs. Hong Kong and the Mainland are not part of an EU customs territory. In this
case, Hong Kong has a free port while China has tariffs. Second, EU firms can set up shop in
other EU members and supply services there. Despite the 2003 Mainland-Hong Kong CEPA's
liberalization of services, the movement of goods and services between the two countries
remains restricted. There is no free movement between Hong Kong and the Mainland in the EU.
Three fundamental asymmetries define economic integration between the Mainland and Hong
Kong: variations in economic development level, economic scale, and degree of openness.
Economic integration
'One Country, Two Systems' has advantages and disadvantages for Hong Kong. It is
easier to tap into China's vast pool of human capital, technological know-how, and financial
resources when the country is unified under a single government (Cheung, 2014). The central
government can also provide policy support by utilizing Hong Kong as a global hub for
Renminbi internationalization. Local salaries, social services, and income distribution all suffer
due to immigration. Hong Kong's economy is likewise susceptible to changes in the Mainland.
Numerous advantages may be gained by using two systems at the same time. It means that Hong
5
Kong may continue to run its government and courts and its budget and currency. Customs and
financial matters in Hong Kong are mostly independent of the rest of China. Two systems come
with a price tag. Several systemic disparities between Hong Kong and the Mainland make policy
cooperation challenging. For Hong Kong citizen, working and living on the Mainland is also a
challenge. Another theory is that Beijing prefers the financial centre of Shanghai over Hong
There are numerous areas where Hong Kong and the rest of China may complement each
other, despite the growing rivalry. The political, legal, cultural, and social landscapes of Hong
Kong and the Mainland are very different. According to geopolitics, China's rise to power poses
a danger to its neighbours, whereas Hong Kong is an open, cosmopolitan city welcoming to the
business community (Clark, 1989). For the HKSAR passport, 156 countries/territories have
allowed visa-free entry; just 50 countries/territories have done the same for the Chinese Passport.
Only in Hong Kong are property rights and individual liberties protected by a common law
system. As might be expected, Beijing is well aware of Hong Kong's role as a global arbitration
centre.
PART 2
Following the "one nation, two systems" principle, Hong Kong returned to Chinese
control in 1997. Hong Kong's Basic Law codifies this system and grants territory-wide latitude in
all areas except defence and foreign policy. The Chinese government views it as a strategy to
integrate Hong Kong into the country's overall economy fully (Information Office of the State
Council, 2014). With this agreement, Hong Kong citizens should expect greater control over
their government and judiciary and civil freedoms and progress toward a more democratic
6
society. To persuade Taiwan to join China, "One nation, two systems" was established in 1981,
promising Taiwan a high degree of autonomy and an unaltered economic system if it agreed to
join.
Despite Hong Kong's independence in economic matters, the 'One Country' principle
dictates that Hong Kong's sovereignty in these matters must be subordinated to China's national
interests. For example, Beijing might compel Hong Kong to follow suit if China imposes a trade
embargo on another country due to war or foreign policy issues. Because they are considered
Chinese citizens, Hong Kong Chinese do not need a visa to access the Mainland. Mainland-Hong
Kong economic policy coordination is challenging because of the significant contrasts between
the two systems, yet the two economies are increasingly coordinating their economic policies
and quality before the law, and the right to protest, strike and vote are all included in the
protection of civil freedoms detailed in the Basic Law (Morris, & Vickers, 2015). International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) clauses are also applicable in Hong Kong.
Human rights in Hong Kong have been particularly sensitive since the P.L.A. removed protestors
from Tiananmen Square in 1989. Civil liberties were cited as a major issue in the 2003 national
security law debate. These challenges to Hong Kong civil rights have escalated substantially in
recent years. These may be regarded from the perspective of a tightening of security rules and
freedom of speech on the Mainland. They offer little to promote the ongoing usefulness of "one
Pro-establishment and democratic organizations have long clashed over the lack of a
schedule for drafting Hong Kong's new constitution. It was hoped that two clauses of the Basic
Law, which declared that universal suffrage would be the ultimate goal, would lead to success
for pro-democracy parties, who have garnered up to 60% of votes in Legislative Council
elections but have never been able to win the same number of seats (Ortmann, 2016). The
democrats were shocked and disappointed by these events, which they saw as a breach of the
Basic Law and the promises made under the slogan "one nation, two systems." When young
people were more disillusioned with growing economic inequality, overpriced housing, and
limited chances for social mobility, they turned their anger toward the democratic process and
policies that were more responsive to their concerns. The Umbrella Movement's emphasis on
genuine universal suffrage was legalistic as the Scotts, (1993) points out, in contrast to the false
universal suffrage offered by the governments of China and Hong Kong. The general idea of the
1990s that what was put into law under "one nation, two systems" would come to fruition seems
Legitimating like "one nation two systems", preservation needs to be altered and
maintained in light of changing conditions. It is necessary if they are to be sustained. There may
be no requirement for the Chinese government to conduct a review of a concept that has
successfully served to reassure anxious Hong Kong citizens that their way of life, civil liberties,
and economic and legal systems would be preserved after 1997. This concept has been called the
"one country, two systems" formula. Because China has sovereignty over Hong Kong and
because Hong Kong is a part of China, the only justifications required to speed up the process of
integration are that China has sovereignty over Hong Kong and that Hong Kong is a part of
China. Mainland officials seem increasingly intent on speeding up the process. It is possible that
8
the slogan "one nation, two systems" still has some propagandist value and some bearing on the
However, suppose the steadily increasing number of breaches of its core premises and
assurances are allowed to continue. In that case, it will be nothing more than a shell of what
many people in Hong Kong believed was meant to be the result of these reforms. Fewer than half
of those who took part in the Public Opinion Poll conducted by the University of Hong Kong at
the end of 2016 expressed trust in the "one nation, two systems" formula. Suppose there is no
indication that there will be beneficial improvements to the electoral system, the preservation of
civil freedoms, judicial independence and the rule of law by 2047 when the Basic Law expires.
In that case, confidence is likely to collapse much more. Both rapid incorporation of Hong Kong
into China and a gradual continuation along the current scenario would have very negative
repercussions for Hong Kong. However, the latter will likely have more of an impact. The first
option will most likely result in additional radicalization and an increasing lack of faith in the
notion of "one nation, two systems," whilst the second option will not alleviate the challenges
involved with putting the concept into practice. Every time there is an allegation that "one nation,
two systems" has been broken, another nail is driven into its coffin. Suppose action is not done
quickly on both sides of the border to prove that the notion implies something more than hollow
promises. In that case, its days as a legitimating ideology seem to be numbered, and its days as a
References
Cheung, C. Y. (2014). Hong Kong's Systemic Crisis of Governance and the Revolt of the 'Post-
80s' Youths. New Trends of Political Participation in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: City
Clark, D. (1989). A high degree of autonomy under the Basic Law: An analysis. Hong Kong:
Information Office of the State Council. (2014). The practice of the "One Country, Two
Jayasuriya, K. (2006). Law, capitalism and power in Asia: the rule of law and legal institutions.
Routledge.
Jitaru, Loredana & Popescul Dumitrașciuc, Lorena. (2017). China’s Rise and Its Implications for
Jones, C. (1999). Law as a substitute for politics in Hong Kong and China. Law, Capitalism and
Morris, P., & Vickers, E. (2015). Schooling, politics and the construction of identity in Hong
Kong: The 2012 "Moral and National Education" crisis in historical context. Comparative
Ng, J., Lau, C., Lam, J., & Cheung, T. (2016). Barred Hong Kong localists vow to keep fighting
after the High Court decision. South China Morning Post, 16.
Ortmann, S. (2016). The lack of sovereignty, the Umbrella Movement and democratisation in
Scott, I. (1993). Legitimacy and its discontents: Hong Kong and the reversion to Chinese
Scott, Ian. (2017). "One country, two systems": the end of a legitimating ideology?. Asia Pacific
Sung, Y. W. (2018). Becoming part of one national economy: Maintaining two systems in the
midst of the rise of China 1. In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Hong Kong (pp.
66-85). Routledge.