Sample For Esp Final Assignment-Course Design
Sample For Esp Final Assignment-Course Design
I. Introduction
English for Specific Purposes (ESP) has been acknowledged since the 1960s to be a vital
and innovative activity within the Teaching of English as a Foreign or Second Language
movement (Dudley - Evans & St. John, 1998). A large number of language researchers have
defined ESP variously. According to Hutchinson and Waters (1986, 19), “ESP is an approach to
language teaching in which all decisions as to content and method are based on the learner’s
reason for learning”. In line with Hutchinson and Waters’view, Strevens declared that “ESP is
designed to meet specified needs of learners; related to content, to particular disciplines,
occupations and activities; and centered on the language appropriate to those activities, in syntax,
lexis, discourse, semantics”. Supporting these definitions, Richards and Schmidt (2010) perceived
ESP as “the role of English in a language course or programme of instruction in which the content
and aims of the course are fixed by the specific needs of a particular group of learners.” Thus, it
could be concluded that ESP is regarded as a part of English Language Teaching (ELT), which is
goal-oriented, content-based and learner-centered. To meet the definition above, ESP courses
must be based on six fundamental elements namely needs analysis, approaches, syllabus design,
material design, teaching methodology and assessment. This study aims to focus on the ESP
course design.
A key component in ESP teaching is approach. There are probably several approaches to
ESP course design, however, generally three main types including language-centered, skills-
centered and learning-centered (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987) are identified. Language-centered
approach has provided several important insights into the nature of specific language needs;
however it is viewed as static, inflexible and too logical, which leads to limitation in learners’
skills in doing tests or performing languages . In contrast, skills-centered approach puts more
emphasis on the process of language use but not language learning. Language learners could aim
at several certain skills and utilize strategies underlying language behaviors to produce or
comprehend discourse but they may struggle with a lack of linguistic knowledge such as grammar
mistakes, incorrect structures, etc. . Another approach being usually remained in ESP courses is
learner-centered approach which considers learners to be the major subject at every stage of
teaching. To put thoroughly the approaches into practice, the stage of need analysis should be
done productively. Even though each of these approaches demonstrates its own weakness, a
combination of them would be more effective for students to address their shortcomings and to
boost both language skills and language key features. Teachers desiring to achieve this
requirement should deliver different kinds of tasks and task-base can be an effective tool for
application. Richards, Platt and Weber (1985) referred tasks to “processing and understanding
language” and Nunan (1989) claimed that tasks involved learners in “comprehending,
manipulating, producing or interacting in the target language”. Furthermore, not only do tasks
aim at activities relevant to any kind of the four language skills but also integrate all four skills
and alter from fluency to accuracy. Using task-based approach in language teaching requires
learners to use authentic language through meaningful tasks and encourage meaningful
communication. It offers a great deal of flexibility, potentially making classroom activities far
more motivational and inspirational to students. Therefore, it is a good idea for this approach to
be applied more widely in Vietnam schools.
2. Needs analysis
Needs analysis were conducted through some questionnaires, observations and interviews. The
results of the questionnaires, observations and interviews have provided a basis for the design of
the course.
2.1 Lacks
Students often lack vocabularies and grammatical structures so they get difficulties in making a
full sentences and expressing their ideas in properly ones. They also are not surrounded by English
speaking environment. Thus, they did not have chance to practice speaking English and lost their
confidence in English communication.
2.2 Necessities
Students need to have a solid foundation of communicative English speaking so that they are able
to speak about the daily topics and make daily conversation.
2.3 Wants
According to the questionnaires and interviews’ results, most students want to be able to use
English in communication in daily life, particularly in class at university and at work and express
their ideas in sentences accurately.
3. Materials
• FTF “Face to Face elementary by Chris Redston and Gillie Cunningham”
This is a textbook in the series famous English books for English learners from basic to advanced
levels. This textbook helps the learners learn English to communicate easily, quickly and
efficiently. This is also the main textbook in this communicative course. This book combines the
best English learning from EFL and the best English methods of modern education. One of the
highlight characteristics is numerous exercises to help students train two skills: Speaking and
listening. The interactive exercises help learners understand and speak English in both aspects:
Accuracy and Fluency. It helps learners to practice grammatical structure, sentence pronouns and
develop vocabularies. This also introduce the approach to help learners collect knowledge easily
and efficiently.
• EGI “English Grammar In Use by Raymond Murphy”
This book will help learners to improve their basic grammar comprehension through the
combination grammar and practical exercises in a single book. A grammar is explained on the
left side of each page and the other side is exercises to test the ability to understand the lesson.
These exercises to do in the expanded part of each lesson suggest some practical grammar for the
next lesson. The list of contents and an index detailing headings are easy for users that can be
found easily the needed lessons. The answers key at the end of the book is useful for learners’
assessment.
• TFL “Tactic for listening basic by Jack C Richards”
This is comprehensive books for listening skills. It is the basis for an intensive listening course or
a language laboratory course. There are some complementary texts in a conversation course for
adults and young adult learners of American English. Fun, natural-sounding recordings that
reflect everyday situations and new follow-up listening and speaking activities for in-depth
practice are used. This book has also the expand 'Over to You' sections for extra speaking practice
and student audio CD for practice outside the classroom and photocopy speaking activities for
each unit. The midterm, final, and unit tests with Audio CDs in this book are easy for students’
assessment.
4. Syllabus design
Course description
This course is an introduction to basic English communication. The course covers some key
aspects of English communication including vocabularies about the most common topic in
daily life, basic grammar attached to support learners practice speaking activities and various
situations for students to practice speaking individually, in pair and in a group and a range of
exciting listening exercises.
Class meets three times a week for 2.0 hours per lesson during 10 weeks
Course objectives
At the end of the course, student will be able to
- Build vocabulary at elementary level
- Memorize and apply basic grammar into speaking
- Communicate in English in almost all daily conversation at school and at workplace
- Boost listening skill and be able to understand native accents in English communication
at elementary level
- Gain confidence when speaking English in daily life
Assessment
- Attendance and participation: 20%
- Portfolio: 40%
- Mid-term test: 10%
- Final test: 30%
SYLLABUS
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge
University Press.
Graves, K. (1996). A framework of course development processes. Teachers as course developers, 12-38.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, T., Waters, A., & Breen, M. P. (1979). An English language curriculum for technical students. Practical Papers in English
Language Education, 2, 146-171.
Iwai, T., Kondo, K., Lim, D. S., Ray, G., Shimizu, H., & Brown, J. D. (1999). Japanese language needs analysis, 1998-1999.
Munby, J., (1978). Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge University Press.
Nation, P., & Crabbe, D. (1991). A survival language learning syllabus for foreign travel. System, 19(3), 191-201.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Read and Roe (n.d), Designing the assessment of a university ESOL course, 102-113
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Dictionary of language teaching & applied linguistics (4th ed.). Harlow, Great Britain: Pearson
Education Limited.
Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman.
Scriven, M. S. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, and AERA monograph Series on
Curriculum Evaluation, 1. Chicago: Rand NcNally.
Strevens, P. (1988). The learner and teacher of ESP. ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation, 39-44.