4 PB
4 PB
4 PB
Article History Previous studies have found that academic burnout occurred at all
Received : 31/05/2023 levels of education, including universities. Academic burnout is
Revised : 14/11/2023 characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a lack
26/11/2023
of confidence in students' abilities. Various variables can influence it,
28/11/2023
01/12/2023 such as personality, well-being, and demographic factors. This research
Accepted : 04/12/2023 uses a correlational design to examine the relationship between
personality and academic burnout among college students while
exploring the role of psychological well-being as a mediator and
Keywords: demographic factors as a moderator. This design allows for the
Academic Burnout, simultaneous collection of data from many individuals. We recruited
Demographic Factors, 522 undergraduate students to participate in an online survey and used
Personality, the Maslach-Student Burnout Inventory (MSBI), NEO Five-Factor
Psychological Well-Being.
Inventory (FFI), and Psychological Well-being Questionnaire for
measurement. For data analysis, we used SPSS version 25 and IBM
SPSS AMOS version 24 to determine the mediation-moderation effect
Copyright © 2023 IJIEP and tested the factor analysis of the proposed model. This research
found a relationship between personality and academic burnout, with
extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to
This work is licensed under experience associated with low academic burnout. In contrast,
a CC BY-SA 4.0 neuroticism was associated with high academic burnout. Furthermore,
International license.
the level of student psychological well-being was found to mediate the
correlation between personality and academic burnout. Therefore, this
study recommends that students, teachers, and parents pay attention
to the importance of psychological well-being.
Citation:
Wahyuni, S., Agustina, H., & Munthe, R. A. (2023). The relationship between personality and
academic burnout: Exploring the influence of psychological well-being and demographic
factors. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 4(2), 169-189.
https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v4i2.18687
Wahyuni, Agustina, & Munthe| The Relationship between Personality and Academic Burnout:
Exploring the Influence of Psychological Well-Being and Demographic Factors
INTRODUCTION
Studying in college significantly differs from high school due to the increased
academic and social demands, which can lead to stress and fatigue (Lin & Huang,
2014). Academic demands include completing assignments for each course and
preparing for exams. In addition to coursework, students are also expected to
have strong social skills to interact with their peers. They will often work on
group assignments that require collaboration and will be together until they
obtain their bachelor's degree. Furthermore, students who do not live with their
parents in boarding houses or dormitories face additional demands such as
adaptability, social interaction, and autonomy. If students are unable to handle
these demands effectively, regulate their emotions, and solve problems, they may
experience feelings of boredom, psychosomatic issues, and academic burnout
(Cazan & Năstasă, 2015).
Burnout was originally used in the workplace as a psychological syndrome
caused by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased performance
due to emotional and interpersonal stress (Maslach et al., 2001). Emotional
exhaustion is the most prominent aspect of burnout and is closely related to
fatigue. In students, this fatigue significantly impacts their ability to complete
assignments. Burnout leads individuals to emotionally and cognitively distance
themselves from tasks because they feel overwhelmed by the demands.
Depersonalization involves behaving cynically and indifferently towards tasks
when feeling tired and hopeless. Furthermore, the lack of personal
accomplishment at work, caused by prolonged work demands and a lack of
resources or facilities, results in cynicism towards work and ineffective
performance.
Academic burnout refers to the fatigue, cynicism, and feeling of incompetence
experienced by students, which leads to a lack of class participation, reluctance
to contribute to group assignments, difficulty learning new material, and a sense
of meaninglessness (Rahmatpour et al., 2019). According to Liu et al. (2019), the
first symptom of academic burnout is emotional exhaustion, which affects
personal well-being and leads to feeling overwhelmed. The second symptom is
cynicism, where students develop a distant attitude towards academic activities
and peers. At last, low self-efficacy results in a decline in academic achievement.
Numerous studies have shown that academic burnout is prevalent among
university students (Ramadhan et al., 2022). Their research on students at the
Faculty of Psychology found that most respondents experienced academic
burnout, with 45.8% reporting emotional exhaustion, 34.9% experiencing
depersonalization, and 62.7% having a decrease in academic achievement
efficacy. Similarly, Marchella et al. (2023) found that over half of the respondents
experienced academic burnout. Furthermore, working students are more likely
to experience burnout (Orpina & Prahara, 2019). Lee et al. (2018) emphasized that
students are more susceptible to academic burnout when they fail to effectively
cope with academic performance pressure. Among the different aspects of
being and demographic factors. This study investigates the theoretical concept
that student personality, demographic factors, and psychological well-being are
mediators contributing to academic burnout.
Previous studies suggested that burnout primarily affected professionals who
work in helping professions or jobs that involve close interaction with others,
such as healthcare, education, and social work (Maslach et al., 2001). Burnout is
characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, cynicism, and low
personal achievement (low self-efficacy). This research will specifically focus on
academic burnout, a common issue among university students. College students
often face psychological problems related to various stressors in the academic
environment. It has been reported that 80% of student stress stems from academic
fatigue caused by a competitive atmosphere (Collin et al., 2020). Students
experiencing academic burnout tend to suffer from anxiety, depression,
aggression, or anger. This condition is strongly influenced by physical and
psychological exhaustion, leading to frustration, helplessness, and cynicism.
Many studies have been conducted on the relationship between burnout and
personality, specifically focusing on extroversion, openness to experience, and
neuroticism. The consistent findings indicated that extroversion and neuroticism
are related to burnout (Farfán et al., 2020; Pérez-Fuentes et al., 2019). Lee et al.
(2020) conducted a study on academic burnout among college students,
characterized by exhaustion from academic demands, cynicism toward
schoolwork, and a sense of incompetence as students. These individuals tend to
have negative thinking, moods, and coping strategies. Khosravi (2021) found a
negative correlation between personality factors and academic burnout in
students. Curious students who seek new information, can control and direct
themselves, and collaborate well are less likely to experience academic burnout.
On the other hand, students with perfectionistic attitudes toward learning tend
to experience prolonged fatigue and cynicism (Seong et al., 2021).
According to the Big Five personality theory, students with neurotic personalities
are more prone to academic burnout than those with openness to experience,
conscientiousness, and extroverted personalities. However, there is no significant
correlation between agreeableness personality and academic burnout
(Soliemanifar & Shaabani, 2013). Neurotic students are more likely to experience
worry, sadness, loneliness, and depression, which contribute to their
susceptibility to academic burnout (Celik & Oral, 2013). Personality traits such as
extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness are negatively
correlated with emotional exhaustion and cynicism and positively correlated
with self-efficacy (Shofiah et al., 2023). On the other hand, neuroticism is
negatively correlated with self-efficacy and positively correlated with
extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness (David, 2010).
From the explanation above, this research aims to examine the relationship
between personality and academic burnout. Psychological well-being variables
will be considered mediators, and demographic factors will be used as
moderators. This research differs from previous studies in that it focuses on the
role of mediator and moderator variables in influencing the relationship between
personality and academic burnout. In this study, psychological well-being will
mediate the correlation between personality and academic burnout. Students
who possess traits such as openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, and
agreeableness are expected to have a higher level of psychological well-being,
which in turn will reduce their academic burnout.
On the other hand, students with neurotic personality traits are expected to have
lower levels of psychological well-being and experience burnout. Demographic
factors such as gender, length of study, and living arrangements are also expected
to impact the relationship between personality and academic burnout, either
strengthening or weakening it. Therefore, the research hypotheses are as follows:
Hypothesis 1: Personality affects academic burnout reduction.
Decades of research have consistently shown that personality traits significantly
impact how we perceive, approach, and value our lives. The six-dimensional
psychological well-being model, proposed by Ryff (1989), identifies a broader
range of well-being dimensions, including positive relationships, autonomy,
environmental mastery, personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance.
Previous studies have demonstrated strong links between the main dimensions
of personality and psychological well-being, as well as other indicators of human
happiness. Future research will focus on the Big Five personality traits to further
explore the relationship between personality and psychological well-being. Early
research has emphasized the predictive role of neuroticism, extraversion, and
conscientiousness in psychological well-being. Multiple studies have indicated
that the Big Five traits can accurately predict psychological well-being (Anglim
& Grant, 2016). It is worth noting that each of the six psychological well-being
scales shares certain Big Five traits that show a stronger correlation. For instance,
agreeableness and extraversion are closely related to positive relationships,
openness to personal growth, and awareness of purpose in life (Anglim & Grant,
2016; Meléndez et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2017). However, more rigorous analytical
estimates are required to establish a definitive assessment of this cross-
correlation.
Hypothesis 2: Personality has a positive relationship with psychological well-being.
In the meantime, college students are considered adults when they graduate from
high school. However, they often struggle to adapt to the physical, psychological,
and social changes that come with this transition. Students who haven't
established their ego identities are burdened with significant responsibilities. On
the other hand, university life requires actively navigating various situations,
which can lead to increased confusion. This phenomenon suggests that students
may experience burnout during their studies. Ríos-Risquez et al. (2018) found
that academic burnout has remained stable while resilience and psychological
well-being have increased. Emotional exhaustion is the most significant
dimension of academic burnout in predicting psychological well-being. These
theory suggests that individuals with limited resources cannot effectively deal
with threats in the college environment and enter a cycle of loss.
METHODS
The research aims to explore the relationship between personality and academic
burnout and test the role of psychological well-being as a mediator and
demographic factors as a moderator. We conducted a simple open-ended
question with 523 male and female participants who met the requirements to be
part of our study. We chose students as our research population because they are
frequently involved in social and behavioral sciences research and are
encouraged to participate as part of their educational experience. To collect the
data, we used simple random sampling, ensuring that everyone in the target
population has an equal chance of being selected. This method provides an
unbiased representation of the total population.
With a sample size of 523, calculated using the infinite population formula, we
ensured high external validity and representation of the larger population.
However, we had to exclude one questionnaire from the data analysis due to
missing data, resulting in a final sample of 522 questionnaire forms. We used
SPSS version 26 to analyze the data and utilized the mediator and moderator
variables by bootstrapping the PROCESS macro-Hayes (Igartua & Hayes, 2021).
To measure various factors, we used the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student
Survey (MBI-SS; Yavuz & Dogan, 2014), the Revised NEO Personality Inventory
(NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 2008), and the Psychological Well-being
Questionnaire (PWB; Ryff, 1989). The questionnaire was developed based on a
thorough review of the existing literature. Section 1 collected sociodemographic
information such as age, gender, study program, semester, residence, and class.
Section 2 gathered data on academic burnout, personality, and psychological
well-being. All items in the study employed a five-point Likert-type scale,
ranging from 1="Strongly Disagree" to 5="Strongly Agree".
Psychological Well-Being
Demographic Factors
from the independent variable (cause) and pointed toward the dependent
variable (effect) to show a causal relationship. We introduced mediator and
moderator variables in this study, specifically psychological well-being and
demographic factors. These mediator and moderator variables helped explain
how personality can impact academic burnout. Including mediating and
moderating variables helped clarify the relationship between the primary
variables. Figure 1 illustrates the conceptual framework of the studied variables.
The Cronbach Alpha coefficient was used to account for sub-dimensions of the
motivation factor. The value is given in Table 2.
with ß = .733, p > .000, supporting H3. More information about the model fit
indices and the results of the hypotheses can be found in Table 3.
According to Mathieu & Taylor (2007), there are three models of mediation
related to organizational behavior: the indirect impact model, which represents
dependent and independent variables associated with the mediator; the partial
mediator model, which indicates a direct relationship between independent and
dependent variables with effectiveness; and the full mediator model, in which
the direct relationship no longer exists after being inserted into the mediator
model (Memon et al., 2018). Our study's model consists of the direct interaction
between personality as the independent variable, academic burnout as the
dependent variable, and the mediating effect of the psychological well-being
variable. Özhan (2021) and Kolomitro et al. (2020) proposed using the mediation
variable to determine the role of personality and academic burnout. Furthermore,
the model creation considers conditions in which the independent variable
changes.
Table 4. Mediation Analysis Summary
Indirect Confidence Interval P-
Relationship Conclusion
Effect Lower Bound Upper Bound Value
Personality →
Psychological well- Partial
.645 .077 1.448 .030
being → Academic Mediation
burnout
Probing Moderated Moderating
Confidence
Indirect Relationships Effect not
interval
supporting
Low level of
.000 .90
Demographic factors
High level of
.015 .90
Demographic factors
Index of Moderated
.000 .90
Mediation
Hox (2021) found that factor analysis is a technique that assumes the correlations
between a set of observed variables can be modeled by a smaller set of
unobserved or latent variables called factors. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)
assumes that the researcher has a strong theory about the structure of the
investigated concept. CFA serves two purposes: first, to assess how well a specific
model fits the data; second if the model fits well, to estimate the factor loadings,
variances, and covariances of the factors, as well as the residual error variances
of the observed variables. The CFA of the four-factor structure was conducted
using AMOS 24. The fit of the model was evaluated based on fit indices such as
the comparative fit index (CFI), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), normed fit index
(NFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root
mean square residual (SRMR), using the following criteria: CFI > 0.90, GFI > 0.90,
NFI > 0.90, and RMSEA < 0.08. However, the hypothesized four-factor model did
not fit the data well (X² = 4.989, df = 74, p < 0.000, CFI = .449, GFI = .899, NFI =
.411, RMSEA = .087). Additionally, RMSEA will be low (e.g., Brosseau-Liard et
al., 2012), indicating a tight-fitting model.
On the other hand, the three-factor model demonstrated a good fit to the data,
providing evidence of discriminant validity. Furthermore, reliability analysis
revealed that the combined reliability score of the constructs in this study was
above the minimum acceptable threshold (CR > 0.70). All item loadings were
significant (p < 0.05), and the mean variances of extraction scores for personality,
academic burnout, psychological well-being, and demographic factors were
above 0.50, supporting convergent validity.
Lastly, the results of the moderator analysis indicated that demographic variables
did not influence the correlation between personality and academic burnout.
Thus, hypothesis 4 was not accepted.
et al., 2020). Kaya & Erdem (2021) also found that students with high well-being
are likelier to achieve higher results than those with low well-being. Conversely,
students who experience psychological distress, such as depression,
psychosomatic symptoms, and clinical anxiety, are more prone to academic
burnout and lower academic achievement.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the preceding discussion, there is a correlation between personality and
academic burnout. Students who possess extraversion, agreeableness,
conscientiousness, and openness to experience tend to experience lower levels of
academic burnout. In contrast, students who exhibit neuroticism are more prone
to high levels of academic burnout. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the
students' psychological well-being level mediates the relationship between
personality and academic burnout. The psychological well-being experienced by
students can serve to alleviate academic burnout. Therefore, efforts focused on
positive thinking should also be implemented in educational institutions.
However, demographic factors do not exert any influence on this relationship.
The findings of this research imply that students' psychological well-being must
mediate between personality traits and academic burnout. This study has
limitations regarding demographic factors, such as an uneven distribution of
male and female research subjects and an unequal representation of students
residing in boarding houses, parents' homes, or family homes.
Consequently, the absence of demographic factors' influence on academic
burnout is likely a result of these disparities. Based on the results, future
researchers are advised to balance the number of research subjects to investigate
the impact of demographic factors. Other factors that may influence academic
burnout in students should be explored. Furthermore, from a practical
standpoint, university management should develop programs to enhance
students' psychological well-being to mitigate academic burnout.
REFERENCE
Allen, H. K., Barrall, A. L., Vincent, K. B., & Arria, A. M. (2021). Stress and
burnout among graduate students: moderation by sleep duration and
quality. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 21-28.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09867-8
Anglim, J., & Grant, S. (2016). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being
from personality: Incremental prediction from 30 facets over the Big 5.
Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-
9583-7
Baker, S., Gleason, F., Lovasik, B., Sandhu, G., Cortez, A., Hildreth, A., Cooper,
A., Simmons, J., Delman, K. A., & Lindeman, B. (2021). Relationship
Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-
regulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress
and Coping, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
Brady, K. J. S., Ni, P., Sheldrick, R. C., Trockel, M. T., Shanafelt, T. D., Rowe, S.
G., Schneider, J. I., & Kazis, L. E. (2020). Describing the emotional
exhaustion, depersonalization, and low personal accomplishment
symptoms associated with Maslach Burnout Inventory subscale scores in
US physicians: an item response theory analysis. Journal of Patient-Reported
Outcomes, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00204-x
Brosseau-Liard, P. E., Savalei, V., & Li, L. (2012). An investigation of the sample
performance of two nonnormality corrections for RMSEA. Multivariate
Behavioral Research, 47(6), 904–930.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
Celik, G. T., & Oral, E. L. (2013). Burnout levels and personality traits—The case
of Turkish architectural students. Creative Education, 4(2), 124–131.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.42018
Collin, V., O'Selmo, E., & Whitehead, P. (2020). Stress, psychological distress,
burnout and perfectionism in UK dental students. British Dental Journal,
229(9), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2281-4
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised NEO personality inventory
(NEO-PI-R). The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment,
2(2), 179-198. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Peeters, M. C. W., & Breevaart, K. (2021). New
directions in burnout research. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 30(5), 686–691.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1979962
Denning, M., Goh, E. T., Tan, B., Kanneganti, A., Almonte, M., Scott, A., Martin,
G., Clarke, J., Sounderajah, V., Markar, S., Przybylowicz, J., Chan, Y. H., Sia,
C. H., Chua, Y. X., Sim, K., Lim, L., Tan, L., Tan, M., Sharma, V., … Kinross,
J. (2021). Determinants of burnout and other aspects of psychological well-
being in healthcare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: A
multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0238666.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238666
Farfán, J., Peña, M., Fernández-Salinero, S., & Topa, G. (2020). The moderating
role of extroversion and neuroticism in the relationship between autonomy
at work, burnout, and job satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 17(21), 8166.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218166
Gao, W., Ping, S., & Liu, X. (2020). Gender differences in depression, anxiety, and
stress among college students: A longitudinal study from China. Journal of
Affective Disorders, 263, 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.121
Hicks, R., & Mehta, Y. (2018). The big five, type a personality, and psychological
well-being. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 10(1), 49–59.
https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v10n1p49
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation
of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their
consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational
Behavior, 5, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-
104640
Ilic, I., Macuzic, I. Z., Kocic, S., & Ilic, M. (2021). High risk of burnout in medical
students in Serbia, by gender: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 16(8), 1–
15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256446
Karimi, L., & Meyer, D. (2014). Structural equation modeling in psychology: The
history, development, and current challenges. International Journal of
Psychological Studies, 6(4), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v6n4p123
Kaya, M., & Erdem, C. (2021). Students' well-being and academic achievement:
A meta-analysis study. Child Indicators Research, 14(5), 1743–1767.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-021-09821-4
Khosravi, M. (2021). Burnout among Iranian medical students: Prevalence and its
relationship to personality dimensions and physical activity. European
Journal of Translational Myology, 31(1), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2021.9411
Kolomitro, K., Kenny, N., & Sheffield, S. L. M. (2020). A call to action: exploring
and responding to educational developers' workplace burnout and well-
being in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development,
25(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1705303
Kong, L. N., Yang, L., Pan, Y. N., & Chen, S. Z. (2021). Proactive personality,
professional self-efficacy and academic burnout in undergraduate nursing
students in China. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(4), 690–695.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.04.003
Lee, H. F., Chiang, H. Y., & Kuo, H. T. (2018). Relationship between authentic
leadership and nurses' intent to leave: The mediating role of work
environment and burnout. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(1), 52–65.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12648
Lee, J., Puig, A., Lea, E., & Lee, S. M. (2013). Age-related differences in academic
burnout of Korean adolescents. Psychology in The Schools, 50(10), 1015–1031.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pits
Lee, M., Lee, K. J., Lee, S. M., & Cho, S. (2020). From emotional exhaustion to
cynicism in academic burnout among Korean high school students:
Focusing on the mediation effects of hatred of academic work. Stress and
Health, 36(3), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2936
Lee, S. J., Choi, Y. J., & Chae, H. (2017). The effects of personality traits on
academic burnout in Korean medical students. Integrative Medicine Research,
6(2), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2017.03.005
Lewis, E. G., & Cardwell, J. M. (2020). The big five personality traits,
perfectionism and their association with mental health among UK students
on professional degree programmes. BMC Psychology, 8(54), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00423-3
Lin, S. H., & Huang, Y. C. (2014). Life stress and academic burnout. Active
Learning in Higher Education, 15(1), 77–90.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514651
Liu, X., Ping, S., & Gao, W. (2019). Changes in undergraduate students'
psychological well-being as they experience university life. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(16), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162864
Marchella, F., Matulessy, A., & Pratitis, N. (2023). Academic burnout pada
mahasiswa tingkat akhir: Bagaimana peranan prokrastinasi akademik dan
academic burnout?. INNER: Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 28-37.
Retrieved from https://aksiologi.org/index.php/inner/article/view/827
Marôco, J., Assunção, H., Harju-Luukkainen, H., Lin, S. W., Sit, P. S., Cheung, K.
C., Maloa, B., Ilic, I. S., Smith, T. J., & Campos, J. A. D. B. (2020). Predictors
of academic efficacy and dropout intention in university students: Can
engagement suppress burnout?. PLoS ONE, 15(10), 1–26.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239816
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual review of
psychology, 52(1), 397-422.
Meléndez, J. C., Satorres, E., Cujiño, M. A., & Reyes, M. F. (2019). Big five and
psychological and subjective well-being in Colombian older adults. Archives
of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 82, 88–93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.01.016
Memon, M. A., Cheah, J.-H., Ramayah, T., Ting, H., & Chuah, F. (2018). Mediation
analysis issues and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation
Modeling, 2(1), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.2(1)01
Orpina, S., & Prahara, S. A. (2019). Self-efficacy dan burnout akademik pada
mahasiswa yang bekerja. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 3(2),
119–130. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201932.93
Pérez-Fuentes, M. del C., Jurado, M. del M. M., Martínez, Á. M., & Linares, J. J.
G. (2019). Burnout and engagement: Personality profiles in nursing
professionals. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(3), 286.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030286
Prowse, R., Sherratt, F., Abizaid, A., Gabrys, R. L., Hellemans, K. G., Patterson,
Z. R., & McQuaid, R. J. (2021). Coping with the COVID-19 pandemic:
examining gender differences in stress and mental health among university
students. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 650759.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650759
Ramadhan, M. R., Rizal, G. L., & Fikry, Z. (2022). Tingkat burnout akademik pada
mahasiswa jurusan psikologi universitas Negeri Padang. Attadib: Journal of
Elementary Education, 6(2), 255–264.
https://doi.org/10.32507/attadib.v6i2.1258
Robins, T. G., Roberts, R. M., & Sarris, A. (2017). The role of student burnout in
predicting future burnout: exploring the transition from university to the
workplace. Higher Education Research and Development, 37(1), 115–130.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344827
Seong, H., Lee, S., & Chang, E. (2021). Perfectionism and academic burnout:
Longitudinal extension of the bifactor model of perfectionism. Personality
and Individual Differences, 172(172), 1–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110589
Shofiah, V., Taruna, R., & Asra, Y. K. (2023). Academic self-efficacy as a mediator
on the relationship between academic motivation and academic
achievement of college students during the online learning period.
International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 4(1), 154–168.
https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v4i1.18247
Sobowale, K., Ham, S. A., Curlin, F. A., & Yoon, J. D. (2017). Personality traits are
associated with academic achievement in medical school: A Nationally
Representative Study. Academic Psychiatry, 42(3), 338–345.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0766-5
Sun, J., Kaufman, S. B., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Unique associations between big
five personality aspects and multiple dimensions of well-being. Journal of
Personality, 86(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12301
Suud, F. M., & Na’imah, T. (2023). Unleashing the positive Mind: Strategi
mengatasi stres akademik. The Journal Publishing, 4(6).
https://thejournalish.com/ojs/index.php/books/article/view/494
Teuber, Z., Nussbeck, F. W., & Wild, E. (2021). The bright side of grit in burnout-
prevention: Exploring grit in the context of demands-resources model
among chinese high school students. Child Psychiatry and Human
Development, 52(3), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-020-01031-3
Vinter, K., Aus, K., & Arro, G. (2021). Adolescent girls' and boys' academic
burnout and its associations with cognitive emotion regulation strategies.
Educational Psychology, 41(8), 1061–1077.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1855631
Vizoso, C., Arias-Gundín, O., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Exploring coping and
optimism as predictors of academic burnout and performance among
Wang, J., Bu, L., Li, Y., Song, J., & Li, N. (2021). The mediating effect of academic
engagement between psychological capital and academic burnout among
nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional
study. Nurse Education Today, 102, 104938.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104938
Yavuz, G., & Dogan, N. (2014). Maslach burnout inventory-student survey (MBI-
SS): A validity study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2453–2457.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.590
Zabuska, A., Ginsborg, J., & Wasley, D. (2018). A preliminary comparison study
of burnout and engagement in performance students in Australia, Poland,
and the UK. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761417751242