Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University

Dinajpur−5200, Bangladesh.

A Term Paper on
The Financing Mix and Choices, Dividend Policy

Course Title: CORPORATE FINANCE

Course Code: FIN 501

Submitted Submitted
By To
Md. Mostofa Kamal Sakila Zabin
MBA in Finance Lecturer
Student Id: 1803140 Dept. of Finance and Banking
Faculty of Business Studies Faculty of Business Studies
HSTU, Dinajpur-5200 HSTU, Dinajpur-5200
 The Financing Mix and Choices, Dividend Policy

Introduction and Background

In the dynamic landscape of corporate finance, two critical areas continually engage the attention
of financial managers and investors alike: financing mix and choices, and dividend policy. These
aspects not only shape the financial structure of a firm but also have profound implications for its
performance, valuation, and relationship with shareholders. In this term paper, we will conduct a
comprehensive study about financing mix and choices, alongside dividend policy, exploring their
theoretical underpinnings, empirical evidence, and practical implications for corporate decision-
making. This study seeks to drive theoretical innovation and inform practical application. We
highlight key differences from past surveys, offering valuable new insights for both researchers
and practitioners.

The financial structure of a firm is fundamentally shaped by its choices regarding financing and
the distribution of profits to shareholders. Financing mix refers to the blend of debt and equity a
company employs to fund its operations and investments. It encompasses decisions regarding the
issuance of stocks, bonds, bank loans, and other financial instruments. The choice between debt
and equity financing is influenced by various factors, including the firm's risk profile, cost of
capital, tax considerations, and the prevailing market conditions.

Dividend policy dictates the precise approach a company takes in distributing profits to its
shareholders. This strategic decision determines the allocation of profits – either retained for
reinvestment in the business to fuel future growth or distributed to shareholders as dividends. The
multifaceted nature of dividend decisions necessitates careful consideration of various factors,
including the firm's projected growth trajectory, current cash flow position, shareholder
preferences, and the regulatory environment. The intricate relationship between financing mix and
dividend policy has long captivated the attention of both academics and practitioners in the field
of corporate finance. Understanding how these decisions impact a firm's value, cost of capital, risk
profile, and ultimately, shareholder wealth is crucial. Furthermore, the financing choices a firm
makes can significantly influence its ability to maintain consistent dividend payments over time.

Over the years, various theories and models have emerged to explain and guide financing mix
decisions and dividend policy formulation. These range from the traditional Modigliani-Miller
theorem to more nuanced frameworks like the pecking order theory and signaling hypothesis.
Empirical studies have provided valuable insights into the determinants and consequences of
different financing and dividend strategies across industries and geographies.

In light of the evolving economic and financial landscape, firms continually reassess their
financing mix and dividend policies to adapt to changing market conditions, regulatory
environments, and investor expectations. Consequently, understanding the dynamics of financing
mix and dividend policy is essential for financial managers, investors, policymakers, and
researchers alike. This term paper aims to contribute to this understanding by critically analyzing
the theories, evidence, and implications surrounding these pivotal aspects of corporate finance.

2
Literature Review

Miller, M.H(1989): The Modigliani-Miller Propositions after Thirty Years, provides a critical
reflection on the enduring relevance and limitations of the Modigliani-Miller theorem in the
context of corporate finance. A central theme explored in Miller's paper is the impact of market
imperfections and taxes on capital structure decisions. Unlike the perfect capital market
assumptions underlying the Modigliani-Miller theorem, empirical evidence suggests that taxes and
market frictions, such as asymmetric information and transaction costs, play a significant role in
shaping firms' financing choices. Miller discusses how corporate taxes create incentives for debt
financing due to interest tax shields, challenging the theorem's assertion of capital structure
irrelevance.

Modigliani-Miller (MM) Theorem (1963): This foundational theory posits that a firm's value is
independent of its capital structure (debt-to-equity ratio) under perfect capital markets. However,
the MM theorem has limitations, including assumptions of perfect information, no taxes, and no
transaction costs.

Pecking Order Theory (Myers & Majluf, 1984): This theory suggests firms prioritize internal funds
over external financing, with debt preferred over new equity due to information asymmetry and
signaling effect.

Signaling Hypothesis (Lintner, 1964): This theory proposes that dividend payouts can signal a
firm's future prospects to investors. High and stable dividends may signal strong financial health
and growth potential, while lower dividends may indicate uncertainty or reinvestment
opportunities.

Frank & Weisbach (2002): This study examines the relationship between capital structure and firm
performance, finding a positive association between moderate leverage and profitability. However,
excessive debt can lead to financial distress.

Denis & Drahmane (2003): This study investigates dividend policy and investor preferences,
suggesting that investors generally favor firms with predictable and sustainable dividend payouts.

Bravman et al. (2015): This study analyzes the impact of industry factors on financing mix,
highlighting how industry-specific characteristics can influence a firm's optimal capital structure.

Graham & Harvey (2001): This book provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing capital
structure decisions, outlining factors to consider for optimal leverage levels.

Brealey, Myers, & Allen (2014): This textbook offers a detailed discussion on dividend policy,
including factors influencing dividend decisions and potential trade-offs between repurchases and
dividends.

3
Detailed Overview

Financing Mix and Choices:

Financing mix and choices refer to the decisions made by a firm regarding the blend of debt and
equity it uses to fund its operations and investments. This aspect of corporate finance is crucial as
it directly impacts the firm's capital structure, cost of capital, risk profile, and ultimately, its value
to shareholders. An optimal capital structure is the best mix of debt and equity financing that
maximizing a company’s market value while minimizing its cost of capital minimizing the weight
average cost of capital. Finding the optimal mix of financing the capital structure that result in
maximum value is a key challenge you will have to face in starting and operating your business.
Your financial mix will typically be composed of two components debt and equity. Companies
have various financing options available to them, including issuing stocks, bonds, bank loans, and
other financial instruments. The decision regarding the optimal mix of debt and equity depends on
several factors such as the firm's risk tolerance, growth prospects, cash flow position, tax
considerations, and prevailing market conditions.

Choosing a financing mix:

Choosing the right financing mix, the blend of debt and equity a firm uses to raise capital, is a
crucial decision for financial managers. It directly impacts a firm's capital structure, financial risk
profile, and ultimately, its ability to create shareholder value. Here's a breakdown of key factors to
consider when making this strategic choice.

No change, Gradual change or immediate change:

We are implicitly assumed that firm have debt ratio different their optimal debt ratio. Once made
aware of this gap will want to move to their optimal ratio. Capitalization change refers to a
modification of a company's capital structure — the percentage of debt and equity used to finance
operations and growth. Usually, a company starts out with equity and then, as its prospects
strengthen and it matures, gradually starts adding debt to its balance sheet.

No Change:
This refers to maintaining the current proportion of debt and equity used to finance the firm. It's
essentially keeping the financing mix as-is. your current financing mix is well-balanced and has
been leading to good financial performance. Debt-to-equity ratio is within a healthy range, and the
firm enjoys access to capital at favorable rates. Market conditions are stable, with interest rates
remaining steady and no major economic disruptions on the horizon

 Advantages:
This approach requires minimal disruption and is the easiest to implement. It maintains
stakeholder confidence by demonstrating stability in the capital structure. Additionally, it
avoids incurring transaction costs associated with restructuring your financing mix.

 Disadvantages:
If market conditions or your firm's needs change significantly, staying stagnant with your
financing mix could hinder future growth opportunities. For example, if interest rates drop
significantly, you might miss out on the chance to access cheaper debt financing.

4
Gradual Change:
This involves making incremental adjustments to the financing mix over time. You might slowly
increase or decrease your debt ratio, for example. This allows for a smooth transition and
minimizes disruption. Your current mix might be slightly off-balance. Perhaps your debt-to-equity ratio
has crept up a bit higher than ideal, or there have been minor market shifts (e.g., slight increase in interest
rates). You recognize the need for adjustments, but a drastic overhaul is not required.
 Advantages:
This approach allows for controlled adjustments to your financing mix while minimizing
disruption. It facilitates communication with stakeholders like investors and employees,
allowing them to adjust expectations for the gradual change. This fosters a smoother
transition and maintains confidence.

 Disadvantages:
Gradual change can be a slow process. It might take time to achieve the optimal capital
structure, potentially delaying the full benefits of the adjustments. This could be a
disadvantage if faster action is needed to capitalize on an emerging opportunity.

Immediate Change:
This signifies a significant and swift alteration to the financing mix. This approach is often used
when there's a pressing need to address financial issues or capitalize on opportunities. It can
involve a rapid increase or decrease in debt, or a significant equity issuance. While quicker, it can
be more disruptive. Your current financing mix is significantly out of balance, leading to financial
difficulties or missed opportunities. Perhaps you have a high debt burden that's straining your cash
flow, or limited access to capital hinders your growth plans. A significant correction is needed to
ensure long-term financial viability and capitalize on emerging opportunities.

 Advantages:
This approach can address critical issues quickly and decisively. For example, restructuring
debt or issuing new equity can alleviate financial distress and provide access to needed
capital. It can also unlock growth opportunities by enabling investments in expansion or
acquisitions.

 Disadvantages:
Immediate change can be disruptive and create uncertainty among stakeholders. Investors
might react negatively to a significant restructuring, and employees may worry about job
security. Additionally, immediate change can be expensive. Restructuring debt or issuing
new equity can incur high transaction costs.

Implementing Change in Financing Mix:

Changing your financing mix, the blend of debt and equity used to fund your company, requires
careful planning and execution. Here's a step-by-step approach to guide you through the process:

1. Conduct a Thorough Assessment:

 Current Status: Analyze your current debt-to-equity ratio, cost of capital for debt and
equity, and overall financial health.

5
  Future Needs: Project your future capital requirements based on growth plans, potential
acquisitions, and operational needs.
 Market Research: Investigate current and forecasted interest rates, industry trends, and
potential economic disruptions affecting your financing options.
 Risk Tolerance: Evaluate your comfort level with debt financing and its associated risks.

2. Define Your Strategic Objectives:

 Balance Risk and Return: Aim for a mix that minimizes financing costs while providing
adequate capital for growth.
 Maintain Flexibility: Ensure your capital structure allows for future adaptations and
unforeseen needs.
 Stakeholder Considerations: Understand investor preferences for dividends (often
associated with debt) and potential concerns about financial risk.

3. Choose Your Change Strategy:

 Gradual Adjustments: If slightly off-balance, consider a gradual increase/decrease in
debt over time.
 Targeted Debt Restructuring: For excessive debt, explore options like extending
maturities or renegotiating lower interest rates.
 Equity Issuance: Raise additional capital but be aware of shareholder ownership dilution.
Consider this for long-term growth strategies.

4. Develop and Execute a Transition Plan:

 Define Action Steps: Outline specific actions to achieve your desired mix, like issuing
new debt, negotiating loan terms, or executing an equity offering.
 Communication Strategy: Develop a clear communication plan for stakeholders,
explaining the rationale behind the change and addressing potential concerns.
 Implementation Timeline: Set a realistic timeframe for implementing the plan,
considering market conditions and regulatory approvals.

5. Monitoring and Adaptation:

 Performance Tracking: Continuously monitor your financial performance, debt-to-equity
ratio, and access to capital.
 Market Monitoring: Stay informed about shifting interest rates, economic conditions, and
industry trends potentially affecting your financing mix.
 Adaptability: Be prepared to adjust your financing mix over time as your business needs
and market conditions evolve.

Cost of Capital:
Cost of capital is a calculation of the minimum return that would be necessary in order to justify
undertaking a capital budgeting project, such as building a new factory. The concept of the cost
of capital is key information used to determine a project's hurdle rate. A company embarking on
a major project must know how much money the project will have to generate in order to offset

6
the cost of undertaking it and then continue to generate profits for the company. It is an evaluation
of whether a projected decision can be justified by its cost.
Many companies use a combination of debt and equity to finance business expansion. For such
companies, the overall cost of capital is derived from the weighted average cost of all capital
sources. This is known as the weighted average cost of capital (WACC).
WACC calculates the average price of all of a company’s capital sources, weighted by the
proportion of each type of funding used.

Formula:

WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) = (Weight of Debt * Cost of Debt) + (Weight of
Equity * Cost of Equity) + (Weight of Preferred Stock * Cost of Preferred Stock).

The Effect of Asymmetric Information:

The effect of asymmetric information, where one party in a transaction has more or less
information than the other, can have significant consequences in financing decisions. Here's a
breakdown of the key impacts:

Higher Financing Costs:

Adverse Selection: Imagine a borrower with a high chance of defaulting on a loan (risky
borrower) hides this information from the lender. This attracts more risky borrowers to the market,
making lenders wary. To compensate for the increased risk, lenders might:
 Charge higher interest rates.
 Impose stricter loan terms, like requiring larger down payments or shorter loan durations.

Moral Hazard: Conversely, if the lender has more information about the borrower's risk than the
borrower (e.g., knows the borrower might misuse the loan), they might:
 Be less willing to lend altogether.
 Offer less favorable terms, like smaller loan amounts or shorter repayment periods.

Impact on Investment Decisions:

 Investors: If investors lack information about a company's true value (adverse selection),
they might be more likely to invest in risky ventures or overpay for stocks.
 Companies: Companies with good prospects might struggle to attract investors if they
cannot effectively communicate their potential due to information asymmetry. This can
limit their ability to raise capital for expansion or innovation.

Impact on Market Efficiency:

 Market Distortion: Asymmetric information can distort market efficiency by hindering
the flow of capital to the most deserving borrowers or investors. This can lead to a situation

7
 where good investments are underfunded, while risky ones receive more capital than they
warrant.
 Reduced Market Participation: Uncertainty caused by information asymmetry might
discourage some investors from participating in the market, reducing overall liquidity and
potentially limiting economic growth.

Strategies to Mitigate Asymmetric Information:

 Financial Reporting: Companies can mitigate information asymmetry by providing
transparent and accurate financial statements.
 Credit Rating Agencies: Credit rating agencies play a role by assessing the
creditworthiness of borrowers, providing lenders with more information.
 Collateral Requirements: Lenders may require collateral (assets pledged in case of
default) to mitigate risk associated with information asymmetry.
 Monitoring and Covenants: Loan agreements often include monitoring provisions and
covenants (restrictions on borrower behavior) to help lenders manage risk.

Implication for Agency Cost:

Implication for Agency Cost, refers to the consequences that arise from the inherent conflict of
interests between shareholders (the principals) and managers (the agents) in a company. This
conflict leads to agency costs, which are the expenses incurred due to this misalignment.

Negative Implications:
 Reduced Profitability: Managers might prioritize their own interests over shareholder
value, leading to:
o Excessive spending on perks or compensation for themselves.
o Unnecessary expenses or wasteful projects undertaken for personal gain.
o A lack of focus on maximizing profits and operational efficiency.
 Decreased Shareholder Value: Ultimately, agency costs can eat into a company's
profitability and stock price, harming shareholders financially.
 Increased Risk: Managers pursuing personal agendas might:
o Engage in riskier ventures that could jeopardize the company's financial health.
o Neglect core business functions, leading to potential operational breakdowns.
 Information Asymmetry: Managers often have more information about the company's
internal operations than shareholders. This asymmetry can create situations where
managers:
o Withhold crucial information that could impact investment decisions.
o Manipulate financial statements for personal gain.

Positive Implications (Potential Benefits):

While less common, there can be some potential benefits:
 Motivation and Alignment: Properly structured agency relationships can incentivize
managers to act in the best interests of shareholders through:
o Performance-based compensation plans that tie manager rewards to company
performance (e.g., stock options).

8
 o Clear performance metrics and goals aligned with shareholder value creation. This
motivates managers to make decisions that increase profitability and stock price.
 Risk Management: In some cases, managers might be more risk-averse than shareholders,
leading to:
o More conservative financial decisions that protect the company from excessive
risk-taking favored by some investors seeking high returns.
o A focus on long-term stability, which can be beneficial for the company's overall
health.
Overall Impact:
The impact of agency costs depends on the specific dynamics within a company. Strong corporate
governance practices that promote transparency, accountability, and alignment of interests can
help mitigate the negative implications and leverage the potential positive aspects of agency
relationships.

The design of Debt (An overview of the process):

Debt financing plays a crucial role in funding a company's operations and growth. However, the
design of your debt structure – the mix of different debt instruments you choose – significantly
impacts your financial health and risk profile. Here's a breakdown of the key steps involved in
designing an optimal debt structure:

1.Assessment of Financing Needs:

The first step is for a company to assess its financing requirements. This involves evaluating the
capital needed for various activities such as expansion, research and development, acquisitions, or
working capital.

2.Determination of Debt Capacity:

Once the financing needs are determined, the company evaluates its debt capacity. This involves
analyzing its current financial position, cash flows, assets, and liabilities to determine how much
debt it can reasonably take on without compromising its financial health or risk profile.

3.Selection of Debt Instruments:

After determining the debt capacity, the company selects the appropriate debt instruments to meet
its financing needs. Debt instruments can vary widely in terms of structure, maturity, interest rates,
and collateral requirements. Common debt instruments include bank loans, bonds, convertible
debt, and lines of credit.

4.Negotiation with Lenders/Investors:

The company then negotiates the terms of the debt with potential lenders or investors. This
involves discussions about interest rates, repayment schedules, covenants, collateral requirements,
and other terms and conditions.

9
5.Documentation and Legal Process:
Once the terms are agreed upon, the debt agreement is documented through legal contracts such
as loan agreements or bond indentures. These documents outline the rights and obligations of both
the borrower and the lender, including details of the debt structure, repayment terms, events of
default, and remedies in case of default.

6.Due Diligence and Credit Evaluation:

Before finalizing the debt arrangement, lenders typically conduct due diligence to assess the
creditworthiness of the borrower. This may involve reviewing financial statements, conducting
site visits, and analyzing the company's business operations and industry trends.

7.Issuance and Funding:

After completing the negotiation and documentation process, the debt is issued and funds are
disbursed to the company. In the case of bonds, the debt may be sold to investors through public
offerings or private placements. For bank loans, funds are typically transferred directly to the
company's account.

8.Debt Management and Compliance:

Once the debt is in place, the company must manage its debt obligations effectively. This involves
making timely interest payments, adhering to covenants, maintaining adequate collateral, and
monitoring changes in the company's financial condition that may impact its ability to meet its
debt obligations.

9.Refinancing and Restructuring:

Over time, the company may need to refinance or restructure its debt to adapt to changing market
conditions or financial circumstances. This could involve renegotiating terms with existing
lenders, issuing new debt to replace existing debt, or restructuring existing debt to improve its
terms or reduce financial strain.

The Intuitive Approach:

The intuitive approach to debt design involves using qualitative judgment and industry knowledge
to tailor debt instruments to the specific needs and circumstances of the company. This may
involve considering factors such as the company's risk profile, cash flow dynamics, growth
prospects, and industry trends to determine the most appropriate debt structure, terms, and
conditions. For example, a company with stable cash flows may opt for long-term fixed-rate debt
to provide certainty of interest payments, while a high-growth startup may prefer flexible
convertible debt to align with its future equity value.

A quantitative approach:
The quantitative approach to debt design relies on financial modeling, analysis, and optimization
techniques to quantify the impact of different debt structures on the company's financial
performance and value. This may involve using discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, capital asset
pricing model (CAPM), or other valuation methods to evaluate the cost of capital, debt capacity,
and optimal debt-to-equity ratio. Quantitative models can help assess various scenarios, such as

10
different interest rates, maturities, and repayment schedules, to identify the most value-enhancing
debt strategy.

Value sensitivity:

Value sensitivity refers to how changes in debt structure, terms, or conditions affect the overall
value of the company. By conducting sensitivity analysis, companies can assess the impact of
variations in key parameters, such as interest rates, on their financial performance and valuation
metrics. This helps identify potential risks and opportunities associated with different debt designs
and informs decision-making to optimize shareholder value. For example, sensitivity analysis can
reveal the level of interest rate risk inherent in variable-rate debt or the dilutive effect of convertible
debt on existing shareholders.

Sensitivity to change in interest rates:

Sensitivity to changes in interest rates is a crucial concept in finance, especially when it comes to
fixed-income securities like bonds and loans. It measures how much the price or value of these
investments fluctuate in response to interest rate movements.

Interest rate sensitivity ratio = RSA$/$RSL$.

"RSA" stands for "Rate Sensitive Assets and
"RSL" stands for "Rate Sensitive Liabilities."

Sensitivity to change in Economy:

Sensitivity to changes in the economy refers to how a business or investment is affected by shifts
in economic conditions such as GDP growth, inflation, unemployment, consumer spending, and
interest rates. Companies in different industries may be more or less sensitive to changes in the
economy depending on factors such as the nature of their products or services, customer
demographics, and supply chain dynamics. For example, luxury retailers may be more sensitive to
changes in consumer spending and economic downturns, while essential goods providers may be
more resilient. Changes in the economy can impact a company's revenue and profitability. During
periods of economic expansion, businesses may experience increased demand for their products
or services, leading to higher sales and profits. Conversely, economic downturns can result in
reduced consumer spending, lower sales volumes, and compressed profit margins.

Investments in financial markets are also sensitive to changes in the economy. Stock prices, bond
yields, and commodity prices can all be influenced by shifts in economic indicators such as GDP
growth, inflation expectations, and interest rates. Investors may adjust their portfolios in response
to changing economic conditions to capitalize on opportunities or mitigate risks.

Sensitivity to change in the inflation rates:

Sensitivity to changes in inflation rates refers to how businesses, investments, and financial
instruments are affected by fluctuations in the general level of prices for goods and services in an

11
economy. Inflation can be beneficial for borrowers, especially those with fixed-rate loans (e.g.,
mortgages). As inflation erodes the purchasing power of money over time, the real value of the
loan amount and future repayments decreases.
Conversely, inflation can erode the real return on investments for lenders. If the interest rate on a
loan doesn't keep pace with inflation, the lender's purchasing power from the loan repayments
diminishes. Businesses can be differentially impacted depending on their ability to pass on rising
costs (due to inflation) to consumers through higher prices. Some businesses might struggle with
rising input costs if they can't raise prices effectively, squeezing their profit margins. Inflation
generally leads to an increase in the prices of goods and services. This can reduce consumers'
purchasing power, forcing them to adjust their spending habits. They might prioritize essential
goods and cut back on discretionary spending. Stock prices can be sensitive to inflation.
Companies with pricing power (ability to raise prices to maintain profit margins) might see their
stock prices benefit during inflationary periods. Conversely, companies struggling to raise prices
might see their stock prices decline.
Fixed-income investments like bonds generally perform poorly during inflationary periods. As the
purchasing power of fixed coupon payments diminishes with inflation, the value of these bonds
decreases. Businesses in sectors with volatile input costs or limited ability to raise prices are more
sensitive to inflation. Companies with high debt loads can be more vulnerable to rising interest
rates often implemented by central banks to combat inflation. Investors holding portfolios heavily
weighted towards bonds might experience significant losses during inflationary periods.

Dividend Policy:
Dividend policy refers to the framework or strategy adopted by a company for distributing
profits to its shareholders. This policy dictates whether profits are retained within the company
for reinvestment (retained earnings) or distributed to shareholders in the form of dividends.
Dividend policy decisions are influenced by various factors, including the firm's growth
prospects, cash flow position, profitability, shareholder preferences, and regulatory
considerations.

The primary purpose of dividend policy is to determine how much of the company's earnings
should be retained for reinvestment in the business and how much should be distributed to
shareholders as dividends. The goal is to strike a balance between rewarding shareholders with
dividends and retaining earnings to fund growth opportunities and capital investments.

The Dividend Process:

The dividend process involves several steps that a company must follow to declare, distribute, and
record dividends to its shareholders. Here's an overview of the dividend process:

12
1.Board Declaration:
The dividend process typically begins with the company's board of directors declaring a dividend.
The board reviews the company's financial performance, cash flow position, and future capital
needs to determine the amount and timing of the dividend payment. The decision to declare a
dividend is usually made during a board meeting and is announced to shareholders through a press
release or regulatory filing.

2.Ex-Dividend Date:
Once the dividend is declared, the company establishes an ex-dividend date. The ex-dividend date
is the date on or after which a shareholder is no longer entitled to receive the upcoming dividend
payment. Shareholders who purchase the company's stock before the ex-dividend date are eligible
to receive the dividend, while those who purchase the stock on or after the ex-dividend date are
not.

3.Record Date:
The record date, also known as the date of record, is the date on which the company determines
the shareholders who are entitled to receive the dividend. This date is typically set a few days after
the ex-dividend date to allow time for trades to settle. Shareholders listed as of the record date will
receive the dividend payment.

4.Payment Date:
The payment date, also known as the dividend date or distribution date, is the date on which the
company distributes the dividend payments to eligible shareholders. The payment date is typically
set a few weeks after the record date to allow time for processing and administration. Dividend
payments are usually made in the form of cash or additional shares of stock.

5.Dividend Payment:
On the payment date, the company distributes the dividend payments to eligible shareholders
through various means, such as electronic funds transfer, check, or direct deposit. Shareholders
receive the dividend payment based on their ownership of shares as of the record date.

6.Accounting and Reporting:

After the dividend payment is made, the company's finance and accounting team records the
dividend distribution in the company's financial statements. This includes adjusting the retained
earnings account to reflect the reduction in equity due to the dividend payment. The dividend
payment is also disclosed in the company's financial statements and annual reports.

7.Tax Reporting:
Shareholders who receive dividend payments are required to report them as taxable income on
their tax returns. The company may provide shareholders with a Form 1099-DIV, which
summarizes the dividend payments received during the tax year for reporting purposes.

13
The Measures Dividend policy:
The term "Measures of Dividend Policy" refers to the various metrics and tools used to assess and
analyze a company's dividend payout strategy. These measures help investors and analysts
understand how effectively a company allocates its earnings between shareholder payouts and
reinvestment for future growth.

Here are some of the key measures of dividend policy:

1. Dividend Payout Ratio:

This is the most common and basic measure. It represents the percentage of a company's net
income that is paid out to shareholders as dividends.

Formula: Dividend Payout Ratio = Dividends per Share / Earnings per Share (EPS) x 100

Interpretation: A higher payout ratio indicates a larger portion of profits being distributed as
dividends. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests the company is retaining more earnings for
reinvestment. However, this ratio should be viewed in context of the company's industry, maturity,
and growth prospects.

2. Dividend Yield:
This metric expresses the annual dividend per share as a percentage of the current stock price.

Formula: Dividend Yield = Annual Dividend per Share / Current Stock Price x 100

Interpretation: A higher dividend yield indicates a potentially more attractive income stream for
investors seeking regular dividend payments. However, it doesn't necessarily reflect the company's
growth potential.

3. Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR):

This metric estimates the maximum rate at which a company's earnings can grow without needing
external funding, assuming all profits are retained and reinvested in the business.

Formula (Simplified): SGR = Return on Equity (ROE) x Retention Ratio (1 - Dividend Payout
Ratio)

Interpretation: Companies with high SGR potential might prioritize reinvestment over high
dividend payouts, focusing on long-term growth prospects.

4. Cash Flow Coverage Ratio:

This ratio measures a company's ability to pay dividends using its operating cash flow.

Formula: Cash Flow Coverage Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Dividend Payments

14
Interpretation: A ratio greater than 1 indicates the company's cash flow from operations can
comfortably cover its dividend payouts. A ratio close to 1 or below might suggest potential strain
on cash flow if dividends are maintained at current levels.

5. Dividend Stability:
This qualitative measure assesses the consistency of a company's dividend payouts over time.
Companies with a history of increasing or maintaining stable dividends are generally considered
more reliable for income-oriented investors.

Empirical Evidence on Dividend Policy:

Empirical research on dividend policy has been extensive and has explored various aspects of
dividend decisions, their impact on firm value, and the factors influencing dividend payouts.

Dividends Tend to Follow Earnings:

Dividends tend to follow earnings, the relationship between earnings and dividends may vary
depending on various factors such as company policy, financial performance, growth prospects,
and investor preferences.
Dividends are typically paid out of a company's profits or earnings. When a company generates
higher earnings, it has more cash available to distribute to shareholders in the form of dividends.
Therefore, as earnings increase, companies may choose to increase their dividend payouts to
distribute a portion of their profits to shareholders.
Companies generally aim to maintain stable and predictable dividend payments over time. To
achieve this, they often adjust dividend payouts in line with their earnings performance. When
earnings are growing steadily, companies may increase dividends gradually to reflect the improved
financial performance and provide shareholders with a consistent income stream.
Shareholders often expect dividends to be supported by sustainable earnings. Companies that have
a history of stable earnings growth are more likely to have the financial strength to maintain or
increase dividend payments over the long term. Therefore, companies may align their dividend
policy with their earnings trajectory to meet investor expectations and maintain investor
confidence.
Changes in dividend payouts can serve as signals of a company's financial health and future
prospects. A company that increases dividends may be signaling confidence in its earnings growth
and financial stability, while a decrease in dividends may signal challenges or uncertainty ahead.
Therefore, companies may adjust their dividend policy in response to changes in earnings to
convey information to investors about their financial condition.
Companies must comply with legal and regulatory requirements when paying dividends, including
restrictions on using capital reserves or borrowing to pay dividends. Earnings provide a source of
funds for dividends that is consistent with these requirements, making earnings a natural
determinant of dividend payouts.

15
Dividends Are Sticky:
The term "dividends are sticky" it means that they tend to remain stable or change gradually over
time rather than fluctuating frequently. The tendency of companies to be reluctant to change their
dividend payout policies, even when their earnings fluctuate. This means that companies often try
to maintain a consistent level of dividend payouts, or raise them gradually over time, instead of
making frequent or abrupt changes.
Firms generally do not change their dollar dividends frequently. This reluctance to change
dividends, which results in sticky dividends, is rooted in several factors. One is the firm’s concern
about its capability to maintain higher dividends in future periods. Another is that markets tend to
take a dim view of dividend decreases, and the stock price drops to reflect that.

The MM theory:
The MM theory, or Modigliani-Miller theorem, is a foundational concept in modern corporate
finance developed by economists Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller. The Modigliani-Miller
theorem addresses the relationship between a firm's capital structure (the mix of debt and equity
financing) and its value in a perfect capital market. There are two main propositions within the
Modigliani-Miller theorem:
Proposition I: Capital Structure Irrelevance: Proposition I of the Modigliani-Miller
theorem states that, under certain assumptions, the value of a firm is unaffected by its
capital structure. In other words, the firm's overall value is determined solely by its
underlying business operations and the expected future cash flows it generates. This
proposition holds true in a perfect capital market with no taxes, no transaction costs,
symmetric information, and perfect competition.
Proposition II: Cost of Capital: Proposition II of the Modigliani-Miller theorem expands
on the first proposition by asserting that the cost of equity capital for a leveraged firm is a
linear function of its debt-equity ratio. Specifically, the cost of equity increases with
leverage, reflecting the higher financial risk borne by equity investors in a leveraged firm.
This proposition implies that the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) remains
constant regardless of changes in the firm's capital structure.

Bird in hand Theory:

The "bird in hand theory," also known as the "dividend irrelevance theory," is a concept proposed
by Myron Gordon and John Lintner in the 1960s. This theory challenges the traditional view that
dividend policy affects a firm's value and argues that investors are indifferent between receiving
dividends and capital gains.
This theory says investors prefer dividends from stock investing to potential capital gains because
of the inherent uncertainty associated with capital gains.
Key points of the bird in hand theory include:

16
 Dividends vs. Capital Gains: According to the bird in hand theory, investors prefer to
receive dividends today rather than waiting for uncertain capital gains in the future.
Dividends are considered a "bird in hand" because they provide a tangible and immediate
return on investment, whereas capital gains depend on future market conditions and are
perceived as less certain.
Investor Preferences: The theory suggests that investors value certainty and prefer
investments that offer predictable income streams. Dividend payments provide
shareholders with regular cash flows, which can be reinvested or used to meet immediate
financial needs. In contrast, capital gains are uncertain and may not materialize until shares
are sold.
Dividend Signaling: The bird in hand theory also highlights the signaling effect of
dividends. Companies that pay regular dividends signal financial stability and confidence
in future earnings to investors. Dividend payments are seen as a positive indication of a
company's profitability and ability to generate cash flow.
Reinvestment Risk: Another aspect of the theory is the concept of reinvestment risk.
Investors who receive dividends can reinvest the cash in other investment opportunities or
use it for consumption. By contrast, investors who rely solely on capital gains face the risk
that future investment opportunities may not generate the expected returns.

Value of the firm:

Firm value refers to the measure of a company's success and prosperity, which is closely related
to the price of its shares. It is an unbiased and reliable metric that stakeholders, shareholders,
potential investors, and managers use to assess the performance and operations of an enterprise
Firm value = ∑ t = 1 ∞ FCFF t(1 + WACC )t .
The value of equity is the value of the firm minus the value of the firm's debt:
Equity value = Firm value – Market value of debt. Dividing the total value of equity by the number
of outstanding shares gives the value per share.

Tax treatment of dividend:

e tax treatment of dividends can vary depending on the type of dividend, the investor's tax bracket,
and the country's tax laws. Here's a breakdown of some key points to consider:

Types of Dividends:
 Ordinary Dividends: These are the most common type of dividend, paid out of a
company's current or accumulated earnings. Tax treatment for ordinary dividends can
differ depending on the situation:

17
 o Taxable Account: In most countries, ordinary dividends received in a taxable
account are taxed at income tax rates. However, some countries might have
preferential tax rates for dividends compared to regular income.
o Retirement Account (e.g., IRA, 401(k):) Dividends received within a traditional
retirement account generally grow tax-deferred until withdrawal. In a Roth
account, qualified dividends might be tax-free upon withdrawal if certain holding
period requirements are met.
 Qualified Dividends: These are ordinary dividends that meet specific criteria set by the
tax authorities (e.g., holding period for the stock). They often qualify for lower tax rates
compared to ordinary dividends in a taxable account.
 Capital Gains Distributions: These distributions from mutual funds or ETFs represent
realized capital gains from the sale of underlying assets. Tax treatment can vary depending
on the type of capital gain (short-term or long-term) and the investor's tax bracket.

Dividend Yield:
Dividend yield is a financial ratio that measures the annual dividend income generated by a
company's stock relative to its current market price. It is expressed as a percentage and is calculated
by dividing the annual dividend per share by the current market price per share. The formula for
dividend yield is as follows:
Dividend Yield = (Annual Dividend per Share ÷ Current Market Price per Share) ×100%
Here:
 Annual Dividend per Share: This represents the total dividends paid by the company per
share over a 12-month period. It includes regular dividends, special dividends, and any
other distributions made to shareholders during the year.
 Current Market Price per Share: This is the current trading price of the company's stock
in the financial markets. It represents the price at which investors are willing to buy or sell
shares of the company at any given time.
Dividend yield is a crucial metric for investors evaluating dividend-paying stocks as it provides
insights into the income potential of the investment relative to its market price. A higher dividend
yield indicates that the stock generates a higher level of dividend income relative to its price,
making it potentially more attractive for income-oriented investors. Conversely, a lower dividend
yield may suggest that the stock is relatively expensive compared to the dividends it pays out.

18
Conclusion:
This term paper explored the critical financial decisions companies face regarding their financing
mix and dividend policy. We examined how these choices influence a company's financial health,
attractiveness to investors, and long-term growth prospects.
Financing Mix: A well-balanced financing mix that incorporates debt, equity, and retained
earnings can optimize a company's capital structure, cost of capital, and financial flexibility.
Dividend Policy: Dividend policy involves balancing shareholder rewards through dividends with
the need to retain earnings for reinvestment and future growth.
Financing and dividend decisions impact various stakeholders. Debt financing can increase risk
for shareholders but may also offer tax benefits. Consistent dividend payouts can attract income-
oriented investors, while a focus on reinvestment might benefit long-term growth prospects.
The optimal financing mix and dividend policy will vary depending on the company's industry, life
cycle, profitability, and risk tolerance. Economic conditions and investor sentiment can influence
these decisions. Companies might prioritize debt financing during periods of low-interest rates or
adopt a more conservative dividend policy during economic uncertainty. Financial managers
should consider the company's long-term goals when making financing and dividend
decisions. Striking a balance between current shareholder returns and sustainable growth is crucial.

References:
Miller, M. H. (1989). The Modigliani‐Miller propositions after thirty years. Journal of Applied Corporate
Finance, 2(1), 6-18.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate finance and the theory of investment. American
Economic Review, 53(3), 300-316.
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have
information advantages. Journal of Economic Theory, 34(1), 1-30.
Lintner, J. (1964). The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock markets
and other financial institutions. The Review of Economic Studies, 31(2), 213-228.
Frank, M. M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2002). Optimal capital structure decisions. Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 16(1), 143-164.
Denis, D. J., & Drahmane, C. S. (2003). Dividend policy and agency conflicts: A survey. Journal of
Corporate Finance, 9(2), 183-228.
Bravman, A., Graham, J. R., & Michaely, R. (2015). Financing decisions. Annual Review of Financial
Economics, 7(1), 367-403.
Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). Investment banking: The inside job. John Wiley & Sons.
Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2014). Principles of corporate finance (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill
Education.

19