Final Design Bridgeeeee
Final Design Bridgeeeee
1
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Importance of bridges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
. .
1.2 Cable stayed bridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3 Design of deck slab. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Permissible Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5.1 Cross Section of Deck. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5.2 Design of interior slab panels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.5.3 Bending moments (live load):- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.5.4 Bending moment (dead loads) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.5.5 Shear forces(live) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.5.6 Shear force (dead) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.5.7 Total Design moments and shear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.5.8 Design of section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.5.9 Check for shear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6 Design of longitudinal girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.6.1 Determination of Reaction factor: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.6.2 Dead load from slab for girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.6.3 Dead load bending moment and shear forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.6.4 live load Bending moment and the shear forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.6.5 Design Bending moment and shear Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.6.6 Design of sections for maximum B.M and S.F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.7 Design of cross girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.8 Design of pylon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.8.1 Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.8.2 Dead loads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.8.3 Live load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.9 Design of cable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.1.6 Pier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.1.7 Pile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2
2.1 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.1.1 Deck slab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.1.2 Longitudinal gi rder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.1.3 Cross girder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.1.4 Pylon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.1.5 Cables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.3 Conclusion . .. …. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3
1 INTRODUCTION
A bridge is a building that crosses a road, railroad, canal, river, valley, or other similar impediment.
in order to give the planned traffic above the blockage passage. The majority of bridges constructed
in the past were made of wood or stone masonry. Modern bridges are constructed using structural
steel, pre-stressed concrete, reinforced concrete, or a combination of RCC and structural steel.
While RCC is used to build bridges with modest spans, structural steel or pre-stressed concrete are
used to build bridges with very large spans.
Bridges have always played a significant role in our surroundings. They have been prominent
themes in both ancient and contemporary literature and art. Bridges have been the focal point of
village or city life, and battles have been fought over them. In many cases, the acquisition of a
strategic location has had a significant impact on the result of the conflict. The digital computer is
the most potent analytical tool available to structural engineers today; it can do a large volume of
calculations that would have taken years in a matter of minutes.
This type of bridge is considered suitable for spans varying from 200m to 600m. The main
components of the girders are:
• 1. Towers
• 2.A number of high tensile steel cables
• 3. Deck made from concrete or steel spanning across the stiffened girders.
• The below figure shows the Cable stayed bridge
4
In project total length of the bridge is 600 meters
Here the cable to cable length=12m
Our project is limited to design the following components
1.Design of deck slab
2.Design of longitudinal girder
3.Design of cross girder
4.Design of pylon
5.Design of cables
1.4.1 D a t a
Clear width of Roadway = 7.5m Span (Centre t o Centre cable) =12m Thickness of wearing
coat = 80mm Concrete mix =M45
Steel =Fe500
σ cb=11.67N/mm
σst=240N/mm
m=280/3*σcb=280/3x11.67=7.99 8
J=1-h/3=1-0.280/3=0.9
n=1/(1+σst/m*σcb)=0.280
Q=0.5*n*J* σcb=0.5x11.67x2.80x0.9=1.67 m=8 J=0.9 n=0.28 Q=1.47
6
Tee beam and slab bridge deck
7
MB=w(m1+0.15m2) MB=350(0.085+0.15X0.024) =31. 01kn.m
ML=w(0.15m1+m2) ML=350(0.15X0.085+0.024)
ML=12. 862kN.m
8
1.5.5 Shear forces(live)
9
1.5.7 Total Design moments and shear
Longer span:
Effective depth for longspan using 10mm diameter bar
175-8-5=162mm
Ast=400mm
Spacing s=196.04mm
Adopt 10mm diameter bar with spacing 20mmc/c
10
For soli slabs T shall be not be exceed half of the value of Tmax
HENCE SAFE
11
1.6.2 Dead load from slab for girder
Dead load of deck is calculated with reference to figure weight of the parapet railing =
0.700 kN.m
wearing coat = (0.08*1.1*22) = 1.936 kN.m
Depth of the girder is assumed as 1200mm (100mm for every meter of the span) Depth of
rib = 1.0m
Width = 0.3m
Weight of the rib/m=(1*0.3*1*24)=7.2kN.m
Weight of cross girder = 7.2 kN/m
Reaction of the main girder = (7.2*2.5)=18kN Reaction from deck slab on each girder
=21.66kN.m
Total dead load /m on the girder = (21.66+7.2) = 28.86kN.m Maximum B.M at centre
of span is obtained in figure RA+RB=28.86X12+18X2=382.82kN
12
Shear Force Diagram
191.41kN
191.41kN
442.08kN.m
RA=191.41kN RB=191.41KN
Max. BM due to udl = 191.4*6-28.56*6*3= 634. 38kN.M moment max=191.41*6-
18*4=1076.45-634.38= 442.08kN.M Dead load shear at support = 191.41kN
350kN
Bending Force Diagram
966kN.m
13
RA=RB=700kN, RA=350kN, RB=350kN B.M = RA * 6-700*1.8*(1.8/2) = 966kN.m B.M
including impact and reaction factor for
Outer girder = 9.66* 1.1 *0.5536=733.194 kN.m
Interior girder 966* 1.1*0.33 =350.067 kN.m
for estimating the maximum live load shear in the girder ,the IRC class AA loads are placed
is shown in fig
reaction of w2 on girder B =(350*0.45)/2.5=63
14
Mmax= 1175.274kN.m
Vmax=577.56kN
The beams id designed as tee-section assuming an effective depth,d=1250mm Approximate
lever arm = (1250-(200/2))= 1150mm Ast=[1175.2*106 /(200*150)]= 5109.5mm
Provide 16 bars of 32mm diameter HYSD bars in four rows
Provide 32mm diameter bars
Maximize of bars not to exceed 32mm diameters as per IRC :21-1987
Nominal shear stress Tv=(V/bd)=(577.5.56*106 /300*1250)=1.540n/mm Hence safe
Assuming 2 bars of 32mm diameter to be bent up at support section,shear resisted by
the bentup bars is given by
Vs=(σsv.Asv.sinα)=[(200*2*804*1)/(1000*20 .5)]=227kN
Shear resisted by vertical stirrups is computed as balance shear =(557.56-227)=350.56kN
Using 10mm diameter ,4 legged stirrups,spacing
Sv=[ σsv.Ast.d/v]
=[(200*4*79*1250)/350.56*106]
=225mm
Provide 10mm diameter 4 legged stirrups at 150mm centres
15
Figure: position of live load for maximum B.M in cross girder
16
Figure: Reinforcement details of T-beam and deck slab
1.8.1 Data
17
1.8.2 Dead loads
Dead load due to Slab = 25056kN Dead load due to W.C = 7920kN Dead load due to kerb
= 2592kN Dead load due to parapet = 2880kN
Dead load due to cross girder = 6523.2kN
Dead load due to longitudinal girder = 15552kN
Dead load due to cables taking as 1.2 factor for total dead load
Total dead load = 72627kN
18
Figure : Reinforcement details of pylon
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.freyssinet.bg%2FpageA.php%3Furl_page2_id%3D
29%26url_lang%3DA&psig=AOvVaw36xQcB4gm-
zXbIBX6g4gJ8&ust=1708701538169000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=2ahUKEwjQofmyn7-
EAxW9VKQEHSGJBtsQr4kDegQIARA2
Figure: ( R A B T y p e ) cables
Slenderness ratio:
20
ck (
Pu = 0.4 f Ag + 0.67 f y − 0.4 f A
ck sc )
9800x103 x3502
1.05 = 0.4x50x 4 + ( 0.67x500-0.450 ) Asc
Ac = 25 x 103 mm2
( )
11.1 Dc − sp asp f y
p
(
2
D −D
2
f) c ck
Substituting the values the pitch distance comes to 18.67 which is roughly 18 mm
21
1.11 DESIGN OF PILE FOUNDATION
Depth of foundation = 14 m
Length of pile above ground level = 0.6 m Total Length of pile = 14 + 0.6 = 14.6 m Cross
Section of pile = 200 mm diameter
LONGITUDINAL REINFORCEMENT
3 2
2450x10 =0.4x50x0.78x200 + ( 0.67x500-0.4x50 ) Asc
2 Results
22
2.1.1 Deck slab
2.1.4 Pylon
2.1.5 Cables
23
2.2 Technical Drawings
24
Pier Shaft Section
Pile Section
25
2.2.1 Specification
General:
o all dimensions are in millimeters and meters unless otherwise noted.
o all elevations shown on drawings are finished surface levels unless otherwise
noted.
Concrete
unless otherwise noted, concrete shall be classified as follows:
concrete class 28 days (15x30 cm) cylinder strength mpa mini. Cement
reinforced a1 21 approach slab, prefab panels 335kg/cum.
reinforced a2 28 in piers, pilecap,transom, abutment, 375kg/cum.
Barrier , inverted t-girder, wall foundation and slabs
reinforced a3 28 in piles 400kg/cum.
unless otherwise noted, all other structural concrete shall be class a2.
The following minimum concrete cover shall be provided to reinforcing steel unless otherwise
noted in case of beams, prestressed girders &
piles etc,the cover will be measured from the outer edge of stirrups,
ties or spiral.
- deck slabs
top of slabs ............................ 40 mm
- base slab
top ............................................... 50 mm
bottom ....................................... 75 mm
- retaining wall
inner ............................................ 40 mm
outer ........................................... 75 mm
- prestressed girder / reinforced girder
top ............................................... 25 mm
bottom ....................................... 40 mm
stirrups .................................... 40 mm
- barrier
top, bottom & sides .............. 30 mm
- piles ............................................ 75 mm
- approach slab
bottom ...................................... 50 mm
top .............................................. 30 mm
26
2.3 Conclusion
It has been demonstrated that the design of cable stayed bridge generally requires the
contribution of several technical professional, each with their own expert knowledge, in order to
achieve the best possible solutions to the various aspects that the cable stayed bridge should
satisfy. It is of fundamental importance that the project manager for a bridge project always
keeps in mind all aspects of project, their interconnection and any situation where they conflict in
the future. We should be involved in all major decision taken about the global project, which
could influence the conception or design of the cable stayed bridge.
27
28