Vivian Winston Statement

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

I am privileged to serve as one of nine people on the Indiana University Board of Trustees.

The trustees hold ultimate legal authority to govern IU as a trust for the people of Indiana,
and we employ the president and her appointees. I am especially grateful to be one of three
trustees elected by IU’s alumni. I respect all of my trustee colleagues and hold them in high
esteem. When I was elected to the Board, I was thrilled. To have the opportunity to serve
my university at such a high level was the greatest honor of my life.
As part of my orientation, I was told that we on the Board should speak with one voice, and
the Chair should be that voice. This perspective assumes that communications from the
Chair accurately reflects the collective sense of the Board on any given issue. I respect this
perspective and have stayed true to it. However, the events of the past few months and the
Board’s response to those events have led me to this point where I can no longer stay
silent.
Within a few hours of the overwhelming vote of no confidence of April 16, the Chair of the
Board had a statement published to the Board’s website that contained the following:

As a Board, we continue to offer our full support to President Whitten. She is the right leader at the
right time precisely because she has pursued a future for Indiana University that will ensure that it
thrives in its next era. It is our intention that President Whitten's tenure as the leader at IU will
provide the many years necessary to realize the vision we have established for the university.

We, the Board of Trustees, stand united in our confidence in President Whitten and the long-term
success of IU.

This statement implies that every member of the Board participated in its creation. But in
fact, I had not seen that statement before it was posted, did not know of its existence, and
did not agree with it. Therefore, it could not truly capture a representative sense of the
Board’s perspective. The statement ignored the seriousness of the vote and disregarded
faculty concerns.
After April 16, things went from bad to worse with the tragic events in Dunn Meadow and
the unprecedented school by school vote calling for President Whitten’s immediate
resignation or termination. The conduct of IU leadership received national attention in
major news outlets and on multiple social media platforms. The university’s reputation is at
stake.
Future decisions made by the Board and public statements on important matters need to
come as a result of equal input from all members of the Board. The Board should promptly
review concerns regarding the demise of faculty engagement/shared governance, general
lack of transparency particularly related to rising university administration taxes on
academic units, and the culture of fear and toxic work environment.
In closing, it is clear that all Board members care deeply about Indiana University and want
to do what is in its best interest. At the same time, as we move forward, it is important that
Board members remember that President Whitten works for the Board, not the other way
around, and she would benefit from our collective wisdom.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy