Assignment Group 2
Assignment Group 2
Jagannath University,
Dhaka. Economics
Econ 2105 - Agricultural
Topic
Submitted By:
Team B Submitted To:
Kamrul islam Shovon (ID B210401014) Tahmina Ahmed
Onik Chanrda das (ID B210401012) Assistant professor
Sumaiya Sultana (ID B210401008) Department of Economics
Tauhid Hasan (ID B200401019)
Jagannath University ,Dhaka
Farhan Sadik Apurbo (ID B210401015)
NurJahan Jannat (ID B210401012)
Submission Date
Sherajum Munira Mysha (ID B210401010)
Sunday, March 24, 2024
▪ Introduction
❑ Government support
Disadvantages of institutional sources of agricultural credit
❑ Lengthy procedure
❑ Limited accessibility for small farmers
❑ Stringent eligibility criteria
❑ High interest rates
❑ Oftel insufficient loan amounts to meet farmers' needs
▪ EXAMPLE
Bangladesh is predominantly an agricultural country where agriculture sector plays a vital role in
accelerating the economic growth. The majority of population here directly or indirectly related with
“Krishi” (The Bengali term “Krishi” means Agriculture) which contributes a significant portion to GDP
(14.23% according to the Bangladesh Economic Review 2018).
Bangladesh Krishi Bank (BKB) has been established under the Bangladesh Krishi Bank order 1973
(President’s Order No 27 of 1973) in order to boost up our economy by providing financing facilities to our
Agriculture Sector. BKB is being run as a Banking Company under the Banking company Act-1991.
The main objective of BKB is to provide easier and hassle free credit disbursement facilities to the farmers,
people engaged in agricultural activities i.e. Crop production, Fish culture, Animal Husbandry etc &
entrepreneurs involved in development of agro-based industries and cottage industries. Its primary aim was
to bring people out of General High Interest Rate Lending System-over which the bank is working over
than three decades. The Bank is guided in accordance with the policies and principles of the Government
of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. BKB has an authorized capital of Tk. 15,000 Million (Taka Fifteen
thousand Million) only and paid up capital of Tk. 9,000 Million (Taka Nine thousand Million) only which
is fully paid by the Government. The Bank started commercial functioning since 1977 to generate more
loan-able fund from the idle rural and urban savings and invest them for the betterment of our economy.
The Bank operates its function through its 1038 branches (except Rajshahi and Rangpur Division) & all are
Online Branches. It has 16 foreign exchange (Authorized dealer) branches. In the field level the Bank has
9 Divisional, 54 Chief Regional and Regional offices for close supervision of the branch activities.
❖ Vision:
Providing loan facilities for achieving self sufficiency in food production and strengthening rural
economy.
❖ Mission:
Besides reaching banking facilities to the people’s doorsteps, giving agricultural, SME and agro
based industrial loans for achieving self sufficiency in food production and elimination of
poverty.
❑ Noninstitutional functions of rural Money market In LDCs
❑ Social Capital Formation: Money markets in rural areas contribute to the formation of social
capital by fostering trust, reciprocity, and mutual assistance among community members. Informal
savings groups, village-based credit cooperatives, and traditional lending practices often rely on
social ties and shared norms to facilitate financial transactions. These networks not only provide
access to financial resources but also serve as platforms for social interaction, collective problem-
solving, and community solidarity.
❑ Income Generation and Poverty Alleviation: By facilitating access to credit and investment
opportunities, rural money markets contribute to income generation and poverty alleviation in
LDCs. Small-scale entrepreneurs, farmers, and artisans can use microloans to expand their
businesses, increase productivity, and improve their livelihoods. Additionally, savings mechanisms
such as ROSCAs and informal savings groups help households accumulate assets, build resilience,
and smooth consumption during lean periods, thereby reducing vulnerability to poverty.
❑ Informal Insurance Mechanisms: In the absence of formal insurance services, rural money
markets often serve as informal insurance mechanisms to cope with various risks and shocks. For
instance, informal savings groups may pool resources to provide financial assistance to members
in times of illness, death, or other emergencies. Similarly, rotating credit associations and
community-based lending initiatives offer a safety net for vulnerable households facing income
fluctuations or unexpected expenses.
Overall, the noninstitutional functions of rural money markets in LDCs reflect the adaptive strategies and
resilience of rural communities in navigating financial challenges and leveraging local resources to support
economic development and social well-being.
▪ Recommendations
❖ Enhancing Access to Credit: Improving farmers’ access to credit through microfinance institutions
and government programs can help them invest in better resources and technology.
❖ Diversifying Financial Products: Offering a range of financial products tailored to the agricultural
sector, including crop insurance and loans for equipment and irrigation systems, can mitigate risks
and encourage investment
❖ Financial Literacy Programs: Educating farmers about financial management, savings, and
investment can empower them to make informed decisions and improve their economic stability.
❖ Technology Integration: Utilizing digital platforms for loan applications, payments, and
dissemination of information can streamline processes and increase transparency.
❖ Government Support: Continued government support in the form of subsidies, grants, and training
programs is crucial for the sustainability and growth of the agricultural sector.
❖ Public-Private Partnerships: Encouraging collaborations between the government, financial
institutions, and private sector can lead to innovative financing solutions and shared risk
management.
▪ Conclusion
❖ The development of agriculture finance and the increase of agricultural productivity should play a
larger role in closing development gaps in the LDCs in the Asia-Pacific region. However countries
should avoid the trap of focusing only on increasing productivity in agriculture as if there would
be no linkages with the other economic sectors. Similarly, focusing exclusively on increasing
productivity in manufacturing and services and completely neglecting agriculture is an approach
doomed to increase the already large rural-urban inequalities. A better strategy is to consider
agricultural development in an integrated manner that is mindful of agricultural and agro-industries
linkages and the need to promote structural transformation of the economy. Governments in LDCs
should play a developmental role and take ownership of this process with support from
developmental partners.
REFERENCES