Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Gastrointestinal Absorption—
Biologic Considerations
Drugs are most commonly given orally and the participation of components of the membrane. Ac-
gastrointestinal tract plays a major role in deter- cordingly. the biologic membrane may he viessed
mining the rate and extent of drug absorption. In as a dynamic lipoid sieve, a semipeinteable lipoid
this chapter, the more important biologic factors rrnihrine Containing numerous aqueous pores or
that inl 1 uence dru g absorption are considered. channels. too small to he seen, and a host of carrier
molecules that shuttle hack and forth across the
MEMBRANE PHYSIOLOGY membr anes like ferries.
Lipid-soluble molecules penetrate the harrier di-
The gastrointestinal barrier that separates the rectly through the fat-like portion of the lipoprotein
lumen of the stomach and intestines from the s 5- membrane. The aqueous pores render the epithelial
temic circulation and the sites of drug action is a membranes freely penueahle to us ater. to mono-
complex structure composed of proteins, alent ions, and to li drophil ic solutes of small
hpoprotgin, and pulysaccharidcs. The barrier has molecular size such as urea. By introducing aque-
ire characteristics of a semipeniteable membrane, ous solutions of molecules of graduated size into
permitting the rapid passage of some chemicals the human intestine, and by determining the facility
hile retarding or preventing the passage of others. of absorption, it has been estimated that the. hy-
Amino acids, sugars, fatty acids, and other nutri- pothetical pores in the proximal intestine tjejunum)
ents required for life readily cross the barrier in the have all average radius of 7.5 A (7.5 x l mm)
healthy individual. At the same time the barrier can and those in the distal intestine (ilcum), one of
be highly restrictive. For example, there is virtually
about 3.5 A) The molecular size of most drug
no leakage of plasma protein into the gastrointes-
molecules suggests that pore. transport is of minor
tinal tract its the healthy mammalian adult. Certain
i mpoilance in drug absorption.
toxins, which would produce lethal effects if pres-
The digestive end products of dietary carbohy-
ent ill circulation in minute quantities, are harm-
tlrales and proteins are hexose and amino acid mul-
less if ingested because of their inability to traverse
ecules that are water soluble but usually too large
the harrier. Most drugs used in clinical practice are
to flow easily through the system of pores. The
administered orally and must cross this barrier be-
carriers in the membrane transport these water-sol-
fore reaching the systemic circulation. Thus, the
uble substances through the lipid, perhaps by in-
characteristics of the gastrointestinal barrier are of
considerable importance in biopharmaceutics. teracting with the solute to render it temporarily
Lipid-soluble molecules as well as small, by- fat soluble.
drophilic molecules and ions are readily absorbed Meiitbrane transport of dru s and other che ii-
from the gastrointestinal tract in an apparently pas- cals direct y t truuh the lipid or ilqtieotts chwie1
sive manner. Certain larger polar molecules with
molecular weights up to several hundred are also
absorbed but i n a manner suggesting the active or, in some Cases, mitre transport.'
Gastrointestinal Ab%orplion—lli olagic Considerations 25
Stornh
( p9 1 to 3)
rode- -
(ph 5
AscedvZ
(p ,i 7 to 8
Si/C of aqueous pores from proximal to distal small dose of a drug that is gic cit orally irul coritpletely
intestine and colon. ahst ched i expowd to I lie is ci before reachingg
The small intestine is also the most important the blood.s :ream . Soi-e the liver is the most i in-
region of the gastointestinal tract with respect to port tnt orca n in the bod y for drug mmmctabol is m and
carrier-mediated transport. The proximal small in- irtetahol itc- some drugs J1y there is the pos-
testine is the major area for absorption of dietary stbiltty tha: a large fraction of the dose will never
Constituents including monosaccharides, anilno reach the -\ sternic cirsul;itton bcausc of liepatie
acids, vitamins, and minerals. However, both vi- ttletaholist: during ahsorptton. This phcnotiicnoit
tamin 8 )2 and bile salts appear to have specific is knowns the hepatic fir s t-pass effect and is re-
absorption sites in the ileum. 5 sponsible r the lcss-than-coniplete hioav;iilahility
The large intestine, like the stomach, has a con- of many dJgs given orally. Metabolism of i t drug
siderably less irregular mucosa than that of the during ab. rptton bs en/N toes found in the gut ss all
small intestine. This segment serves its a reserve may also :ditcc bioavailahtlity. A more detailed
area for the absorption of drugs that have escaped discussion o f these aspects of drug metabolism is
absorption proximally because of their physio- presented n Chapter S.
chemical properties or their dosa g e form en-
teric-coated tablets and sustained - release prod- jIointestinai pH
ucts). The large intestine is no an ideal absorption There ma y he as much as a 10 million-fold dif-
site, however, and incomplete absorption may re- ference in ..ydrogen ion concentration between the
sult if a large fraction of the dose of a drug reaches stomach ard the colon. An exceedingly abrupt, 10
the colon. On the other hand, the large intestine thousand-i.id difference in h y drogen ion concen-
may play an important role in the efficacy of orally tration cxis beta ccii the stomach and the duo-
administered drugs, such as sulfasalaiine, that re- denum. Tr .m pH at the absorption site ,is an itripor-
quire metabolism (reduction) by intestinal bacteria taut factor :n dru g ahorptton because many drugs
in t ileum and colon for hioaetivation. are either '. eak or g anic acids or bases. In solution,
organic cletrolvtes exist in a nortioniied (usumtllv
asiroinfes
Z final Blood Flow
lipid-solubm) and an ioniied iusually poorly lipid-
The blood perfusing the g astrointestinal tract soluble) fo:m. The fraction of each species depends
plays an important role in drug absorption by con- on the pH of the solution. Since the gastrointestinal
tinuously maintaining the concentration gradient harrier (as well as many other barriers andoem-
across the epithelial membrane. The dependence branes in the body) is much more permeable to
of intestinal absorption on blood flow rate changes uncharged. lipid-soluble solutes, a drug may be
from blood flow-independent to blood flow limited well absorbed from one segment of the gastroin-
as the absorbability of the substance increases.'' testinal tract, where a favorable p11 exists, but
Polar molecules that are slowly absorbed show no poorly absorbed from another segment, where a
dependence on blood flow; the absorption of lipid less favorable pH is found. The absorption of
soluble molecules and molecules tha t are small weakly basic drugs such as antihistamines and an-
enough to easily penetrate the aqueous pores is tidepressants is favored in the
tFi small intestine where
rapid and highly dependent on the rate of blood such drugs exist lareely in a nonionized form. On
flow. The absorption rate of most drugs probably the other hand. the acidic gastric fluids tend to
shows an intermediate dependence oil tlosv retard the absorption of weak bases but promote
rate; relatively large decreases from normal tiles- the absorption of sscakly acidic drugs such as sul-
enteric blood flow rate are required to produce an fonamides and nonste roidirl atit i-i tiflani mat ones -
important change in absorption rate. In general, the Changes its the p11 of the fluids in a given segment
rate of drug absorption is unaffected by normal of tract may improve or impede the absorption of
variability in mesenteric blood flow. Ordinarily, a drug.
changes in mesenteric blood flow thaE result from The pH of gastric fluid varies considerably. Gas-
disease or drug effects must be substantial and sus- tric secretions have a p1l of less than I. but the pH
tained to significantly influence drug absorplioti. of gastric contents is usually between I and 3 be-
The entire blood supply draining mo s t of the cause of dilution and diet. The p11 of the stomach
gastrointestinal tract returns to the systemic Cir- contents is distinctl y but briefly elevated after a
culation by way of the liver. Therefore, the entire meaL 141 ahites of 5 .,re tot unusual. Fasting tends
29
Gastrointestiflt Absorption—! otngtc Coustderatiolls
0
Impairment of absorption correlated with the se- U
0
absorption. At 2 hr after oral adniinistratiofl mean I-
rd
drug concentration in plasma s;as about 4 p.g/ml
in the absence of an attack but only 1 .8 .sgfml 0.02 0.04
during an attack meats peak concentrations were gastric eniptyiflcj rate constant
found at 2 hr and 4 hr, rcspecftiely. These findings
are probably the result of the delay in gastric emp-
Fig. 3-6. Relations hi p between the apparent absorption
tying that accompanies a migraine attack. Rectal rate constant 1mm 1 ) and the gastric emptying rate constant
nsetoclopraniide accelerates gastric emptying and (min 1) after a single oral dose of acetaminophen in healthy
absorption of oral tolfenamie acid; the combination subjects-who emptied the drug from their stomachs in a
may be useful for the treatment of migraine in monoexponentiat manner. The line of identity is shown.
Under certain conditions the absorption rate of a drug is
certain patients. rate . Iitnited by gastric emptying. (Data from Clements, JA.,
Not only is gastric emptying an important de-
et 3 1 . 2 9)
terminant of the overall absorption rate. in some
cases it may he rate limiting. In other words, the
gastric emptying. Once the drug reached the small
apparent absorption rate conm of a drug deter-
intestine, absorption was rapid (mean absorption
mined from phannacokinetic s,udies may actually
half-life of about 7 mm).
equal the first-order rate eonflt for gastric emp-
There are many examples of the influence of
tying. This hypothesis was recently tested and con-
drugs that affect gastric emptying on the absorption
finned b y simultaneouSly nieSunng gastric crop- rate of other drugs administered concomitantly
tying and the rate of appearance in blood of
(Fig. 3-7). Propantheline has been found to reduce
acetansioophen after oral administration to healthy
the absorption rate of riboflavin, sulfamethoxazole,
subjects)9 The emptying pat-.ern and the plasma
ethanol, and acetaminophen. mon Intramuscular ad-
acetaminophen concerti ration tme profile were
ministration of meperidine or heroin produces a
closely related. For example. sshen the start of
profound delay in the gastric emptying and ab-
gastric emptying was delayed, there was a corre-
sorption of acetaminophen .34 On the other hand,
sponding lag period during which the plasma con-
metoclopramide increases the absorption rate of
centration did not rise or rose slightly. On the other
ethanol," acetaminophen," tetracycline," and pi-
hand, the most rapid increases in plasma aceta-
vampicitlin)' In most of these cases, there is little
minophen concentrations were found when a sub-
effect on the extent or completeness of absorption.
stantial proportion of the dose emptied in an initial
The motility of the small intestine as indicated
squirt. In those cases where gastric empt)ing could
by small bowel transit time also plays a role in drug
be described as a simple monoexponential process,
absorption. The mean transit time of unabsorbed
there was agreement between she apparent absorp-
food residues or insoluble granules through the
tion rate constant (determined from the blood data)
human small intestine is estimated to be about 4
and the gastric emptying rate constant (Fig. 3-6).
hr.?'
These findings confirin that gastric emptying,
Intestinal transit of pharmaceutical dosage
rather than transmucosal transfer from the lumen forms—solutions, small pellets and several unit
of the stiosli intestine, is the (ate-limiting step in
forms such as nondisintegrating capsules and tab-
the absorption of acetaminophen given orally in
lets—ranged from 3 to 4 hr, independent of the
solution. In all cases, the calculated rate constant
dosage form and whether the subjects were fed or
for iransfer of drug from the small intestine to thC
Iastccl° The gastrointestina l transit (i.e., the time
hloothtrcain was greater than the rate constant for
32 IlPipha rniauu I cs and Clinical Ph a rmacnk Intl cs
food and drugs dunuiai atmeut_ith oral which pass intact from the stomach to the small
medication is almost inevitahl. Furthermore, one intestine and do not release drug until reaching the
should not give all drugs Ott an empty stomach; intestine. Less important effects are observed with
some are irritating and should be administered with well-dispersed dosage forms (e.g., solutions, sus-
or after a meal. pensions, and rapidly disintegrating tablets and
There is considerable evidence that food some- capsules), particularly when the drugs in question
times has a niarkSLd but unprdictabiy effect DO the are water soluble. It follows that the effect of food
rate and extent of drug absorption. Food tends to on drug absorption may depend on the dosage form
decrease the rate of stomach etoptying, due to feed- used. For example, food delays the absorption of
back mechanisms from receptors in the proximal enteric-coated aspirin tablets and digoxin tablets
small intestine, and often dela)s the rate of drug but has no effect on the absorption of enteric-coated
absorption. Food_j ds_o increase gastric pH, aspirin granules and digoxin elixir.
which may in or decrease the dissolution or Recent studies have shown that food has little
chemical degradation of some drugs. Food appears effect on the absorption of cnalapril, 53 an angio-
to interact directly with certain drugs either to en- tensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and
hance or to reduce the extent of absorption. Food isosorbide niononitrate. Enal'april is a prodrug,
stimulates gastrointestinal secretions, which may activated by deesterifleation to enalaprilat, the di-
facilitate the dissolution of poorly water soluble acid form of the drug. The time course of serum
drugs. Food also stimulates hepatic blood flow, concentrations and urinary excretion of enalaprilat
which may have implications for the bioavailability after a single 40-mg oral dose of enalapril is vir-
Of drugs subject to first-pass hepatic metabolism. tually identical whether the drug is given to healthy
The potential for food-drug interactions is suf- subjects after fasting or after a standardized heavy
ficiently great that the US Food and Drug Admin- breakfast. The oral administration of isosorbide
istration now requires studies a to the effects of mononitrate after a light breakfast results in a slight
food on drug absorption as pars of the biophar- delay in achieving peak concentrations in plasma
maceutic characterization of almost every new drug and a slight decrease in those concentrations. con-
intended for oral administration. This requirement sistent with the slowin g of gastric emptying, but
is also being applied to new dosage forms of es- causes no important changes in the area under the
tablished drusts. drug-concentration time curve. Similar findings
Welling, 16 a leading authorits in this particular have been reported for isosorbide dinitrate."
area of drug interactions, has reiewed the litera- The lack of effect of food on the abs'rption of
ture on the effects, of food on dru g absorption. In enalapril is in contrast to the substantial effect of
general, the absorption of drugs taken 30 ruin or food on the absorption of captopril. a related drug.
more before a meal is not affected by food. This Singhvi et al.'' have shown that oral administration
guideline, however, does not appl y to drugs given of I'C1captopril after breakfast decreases the re-
in slowly dissolving or prolonged-release dosage covery of total radioactivity in the urine from 76%
forms. The potential for interaction is greatest (fasted state) to 49% of the administered dose.
when drugs are given with a meal or within 30 ruin Comparing the effect of food on the absorption of
after a meal. Food appears to have little effect on enalapril and captopril. Swanson et al." suggested
drug absorpiion when the drug is given 2 hr or that "oral absorption of enalapril may ... be more
more after a meal. In his reviess. Welling" , places complete than captopril because the sulfhydryl
jnrciiqpS 1itooflç9..prcategOrieS: group of (captopril] hinds to other thiol groups in
interactions resulting in unaffected, delayed, re-, food." The absorption of penicillamine, another
duced, and increased drug absoiplion. sulfhydryl-containing drug, is reduced by about
In most of the cases reported to date, food ap- 50 1/ç when given after a meal compared with the
pears to have either little effect on drug absorption rcults observed in fasting subjects."
or, at worst, it decreases the rate but not the extent s1ost of the penicillins and tetracyclines, certain
of drug absorption. Examples include diguxin, erythroinycin preparations, lincojityci rt, and rifarn-
acetaminophen, pentobarbital sodium, various sul - pin fall into the category of significantly reduced
fonarnides, and cephalcxin.4 absorption after a meal. 067 Absorption of almost
The most dramatic delays is drug absorption all tetracyclines is also markedly reduced when
have been observed with entetic-coated tablets, these drugs are taken with milk or milk products.
34
Biopharflla(CUiICS and Clinical l'Irariira&kitIS
presumably because Of an interaction with calcium '['able 3—I. ttfcO f t)oc on 1hC Abo opt ii if
Riboflavin in FactIr2 and Nonfasting Healthy
resulting in a poorly soluble complex.' ,', The influ-
Subjects'
ence of food on the absorption of antimicrobial
I'rrcvni at,sorbr,I
agents is the subject of a comprehensive review." hose
FasTing Nonrasling
The absorption of other drugs may also he se-
riously impaired when given with food. For ex- 48 (r2
ample, administration of the anticholincrgic drug 10 30 63
propantheline immediately after a meal virtually 5 16 St
abolished its effects on salivation, suggesting a
Data from Lc' Y. 0 nJ ILisko. W.j,
substantial decrease in absorption. In contrast, by-
oscyamine suppressed salivation to the same extent
s;hether given after a meal or to fasted subjects. cosc load %% hen it is taken 30,niin before rather
Another example is hydralazine. Shepherd et than with a meal. -- --
Increased absorption of drugs after a meal is
al." studied the effect of food on hydralazine levels
and hemodynamic response in 6 patients with es- usually rajo nalieed in terms of the following rnech-
sential hypertension. A single oral dose of hydral- anisms: ) delayed gastric emptying causing more
azine (1 ingkg) was given in solution after fasting drug to dissolve before reaching the small intestine
or a longer residence time at ispecific absorption
and after a standardized breakfast.
Hydralazine blood levels were reduced almost sites in the small intestine (' increased gastro-
50% when the drug was gisen after a meal com- intestinal secretions (eg., bile) improving drug soP
pared with the fasting state. The higher blood levels ubil itV (4'direct interaction and soluhilization of
of hydralazine observed in fasted subjects produced drug by food (c 2., high-fat meal s ): food-
a greater change in mean arterial pressure (MAP). related increases in hepatic blood flow causing a
Overall, a statistically significant linear correlation decrease in first-pass metabolism. According to
was observed between the percent decrease in MAP \Vclling," -'the increased absorption of riboflavin
and the log of peak hydralazine concentration in and also chlorothiazide in nonfasting subjects is
blood. The authors concluded that the reduction of probably related to nonsaturation of active absorp-
vasodepressor response when hydralazine is taken tion processes or to slow passage of drug past a
gastrointestinal'absorption window'."
after breakfast suggests that patients with hyper-
The absorption of riboflavin is much greater
tension should take the drug at a fixed time in
when it is taken after a standard breakfast.' The
relation to meals.
Food dramatically affects the absorption of iii- data in Table 3—I suggest tlt the effect of the
meal increases with increasing dose of ii vitamin.
fedipine. 7 ° After a single 10-rug dose, peak con-
centration was136 ngfinl when the subjects were The substantial increase in the bioavailability of
fasted, but only 43 ng/ml after a meal. Time to griseofulvin when g iven with a high-fat meal may
peak concentration shifted from about 1 hr to 3.5 be related to soluhilization of the water-insoluble
drug by lipid components of the meal and by stint-
hr. The mean AUC for nifedipine over the first 6
hr was reduced by nearly 50% when the calcium ulated bile secretions.""
channel blocker was given after breakfast. The high A 20% increase in the urinary excretion of hy-
value observed in fasted subjects was asso- drocliloroth i tizide was found after oral adininistra-
ciated with a large drop in blood pressute and tach- lion of the drug with food compared to that ob-
ycardia. Although the effects of nifedipine were served in fasted subjects. 74 The bioavailability of
less intense when taken with a meal, they remained chlorothiazide is doubled when taken immediately
clinically significant. Taking nifedipine after food following a meal compared to that found in fasting
may reduce vasodilator side effects while retaining subjects." Studies i l l suggest that admin-
therapeutic efficacy. istration of erythromycin cthylsucc mate after a
Tolbutamide taken 30 ruin before a meat lowers meal results in a substantial improvement in bio-
blood glucose in patients with diabetes more ef- availability.tm
fectively than when it is taken with a meal.' 1 This Colburn et al" recently reported that food in-
finding is clinically televani and probably reflects creases the hioavailability of isotretinoin (cis . retj-
both better absorption when taken in the fasted state noic acid), a ret inoid with tow aqueous soluhiht
and higher blood levels of tlbutamide at peak gill- indicated for the treatment of severe recalcitrant
Gastrointestinal Absorplion — B iologic Considerations 35
chemotherapy despite relatively high oral doses of pass receiving phenytoin are likely to require much
phenytoin. The investigators related these findings higher oral doses to achieve adequate blood levels
to changes in the intestinal niucosa induced by the of the drug because absorption is only about 30%
cytotoxic drugs, resulting in impaired absorption of normal. In some cases, bioavailability in in-
of phenytoin. Based on serum levels and urinary testinal bypass patients may be improved by giving
excretion data, the authors calculated that the pa- a more rapidly absorbed form of the drug.
22. I Ictiding. R C c al : 'lire dcperrikrrce of parac eta in , l .ib' 46. Welling, P 6.: lnrrrartiiirms affectin g drug ;ihsnrptmsmn. (liii.
Pharurmacokun , 941)4, 1984.
silrpt ii iii illS the rate of gastric emptying. Br. 3. l'hartiiavol
47:415, 1973. 41. White, R 3.. ct uI.: 1lasnma cutsccntr:itiont of digoxin alter
23 Logan, E.P.A cia1.: Effect oIcimctrdifleOn scnttfl gaston oral administration it the lasting and posiprandial state.
and gastric emptying in man. Digestion, 18:220, 1 978. Br. Med. 3., 1:31501, 1971.
48 lalle, J.M.. Cola/ii. J.L , and Barry. Ii.. I:lf.s of ilL
24. Nitntiio, W S and Prescott, LF.: The influence of posture crony components rut gastrointestinal absorption of r,vcta-
on pa-racetamol absorption. Br. J. Cltn l'luarmacol 5:318,
niinophen tablets in tnan. J. Plmarm. Sri.. 60.1646, 1971.
1978 49 Smith. R13.. ctal.: IharinarsikirteticS of penlobarbital after
25. Encnaucr, R.\V . Bass, J.W., and McDonnell. IT.: intravenou.s and oral administration, J. Pharmacokinet.
Esphagcal ulceration associated nib oral thcophy line.
N. Engl. J. Med., 310:261, 1984. Biopharm.. 1.5, 1 973.
50. \lac[)onai'd. It.. ci al: Effect of food on absorption of
26. Channcr, K S., and Roberts, C.J.C.. Effect of dela)ed
csi>jittagcal transit on acetaminophen absorption. Clin. sulfonanti 2cs its nan. Chcmtiiitftcrapy. 12:292. 1 967.
SI. liarvengt. C ct al. Cephradine absorption and excretion
l'hartiiacol. 'I her.. 37:72, 1985.
in fasting and nosfastin g volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol..
27. Volans, (iN.: Absorption of effervescent aspirin during
migraine. lIe. Med. J_ 4:265. 1974. 13:36. 193.
52 Welling. P (3.. Itifluence of food and diet on gastrointestinal
28. Tokola. R.A.. and Neuvoncn, P .1.: Effects of migraine drug abscc'ption: a review. J. Phmamtacokinet. Biopharm..
attack and nretoclirpraniidc on the absorption of tolfenamic
acid. lIr. J. Curt. Pharmacol., 17:67, 1 984. 5:291, 197.
29. Clements. I A., ci al.: Kinetics of acetaminophen absorp- 53. Swanson. RN.. and VLusscss. P II.: Influence of food on
tion and gastric cmpr)ing in man. Clin. Pharnntacol. Ther., the bioasar!ability of enalapril. J. Pliarm. Sci., 73:1655,
1984.
24420. 1978.
54. Laufen. H . and I.eitold, 51.: The effect of food on the
30. Levy, (3., Gibaldi. 51 . and Procknal, J.A.: Effect of an oral ahsoriron of isoxorbide'5-nutouoflttrate. Br. J. Clnns.
atiticholinergic agent on riboflavin absorption in man. I.
Pharmaco!.. 18:967, 1984
Phaiitt. Sri . 61:798, 1972.
55. Taylor. 1.. et al.: Isosorbimle diusitrate phnrmacokrnreticu.
31. Antonioli. EA , ci al.: Effect of gastrectonty and of an Arutieim. Fuusrh .32: 1 'Q- 9 , 1982.
ntrcholinergic drug on the gastrointestinal absorption of
56. Singhvi. S M., et al.: Effect of food on the bioavarlabtlity
culfon;urriide in man. 1st. J. Chin. Phurrnacol .5:212, 1971. of captopnl is healthy subjects. J. Cliii. Pltarnsaeol.
32. (",1r'cons. 1)0.. and Last, A.F.: Effects of intravenous and 22:135, 1;81.
'st.'l pripanthchine and metocloprainide on ethanol imbsitrp'
57. f)sntau. NI .A., ci al : uvduttion in umuiil pemctllamirie ab-
t.mClis. Pltarmacol. The r., /7:578, 1975. sorption hr food, antacid, and ferrous tulfa'ie. Clun. l'hax-
33 Ninritro. I . et al: Pharmacological mirdiftcatton of gastric macuI. Thrr. 33465, 1989,
.:iOptyiflg. Effects of prirpantheline and tnetoclopraitiide on 59. Kirby, W.\l iii,. Roberts. C I-.., and Bardick. RE.: Coin-
paracetarnol absorption. Br. Med. J.. /587. 1973. parson o f 'so sex tetracclines with trtracnclune and dc
.i-1 . Nimmno, W,S., ci al.: Inhibition of gastric emptying and methl lchIc'rtctraccline. Aniimicrob. Agents Chetnoiher..
drug absorption by narcotic analgesics. Br. J. Clin. Phar- 1961.p. 21/6,
marol., 2509, 1975. 59. Klein. JO., and Finland. 51 L : The new penicitlinr. N
35 Nimiuro, J.: The influence ofuutetocloprarnide on drug tb Engl. J. Sled., 269:1019, 1963.
si..rption. Postgrad. Med. J.. 49(Suppl.):25, 28. 1973. 60. Welling, PG.. Ct all.: Bioavamlabnhity of amptcihlin and
36. Gorhoni, Co., et al.: Absorption of antibiotics: lnfluc'ncc of antoxiciltin in fasted and notifasted subjects. J. Pharttr.
rnctocloprarnide and atropine on serum levels of p/sam. Sci., 66.549. 1977.
picillin and tetracycline. Ann. Clin. Rca., 4:228, 1972. 61. Kaplan. K., Chew, \V.H., and Weinstein, L,: Microbio-
37. Eve, I .S.: A review of the physiology of the gastrointestinal logical, pharmacological and cI inical studies of lincontycin.
tract in relation 10 radiation doses of radioactive materials. Ant. 3, Sled. Sci., 250:137, 1965.
Health Phys., 12:131, 1966. 62. Siegler, 0 I , ci at.: Effect of steals on nifampicin absorp-
38. Davis, S.S., Hardy, 3G., and Fara. J.\V.: Transit of phar- tion, Lancer, 2:197. 1974.
maceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut. 63. Welling. PG.. ci al.: Bioavailabiliiy of tetracycline and
27:886, 1986.. donycycline in fasted and nonfasied subjects. Antimicrob.
39. Wilson, C.G., and Hardy, 3G.: Gastrointestinal transit of Agents Chentother.. 11:462. 1977.
an osmotic tablet drug delivery system. 3. Pharm. I'har- 64. Welling, PG., Ct al.: Bioavailability of erythromycin stea-
tttacol., 37:573. 1985. rate: Influence of food and fluid volume. J. Pharrn. Sen.,
40. llccntranrt. B., and Groschinsky-Grtnd. 51.: Enhancement 67:764, 1978,
of the gastrointestinal absorption of hydrochlorothiauidc by 65. Rutland. J., Berend, N., and Marlin, G.E.: The influence
propatitheline. Er.m. J. Cliii. Pharmacol., 13:385, 1978. of food on the bioavarl:ubility of new formulations of eryth-
41. Jaffe, 3M.: Effect of propantheline on nitrofurantoiti ab. runsycin srearatc and base. Br, J. Clin. Phartnacok.8:343,
sorption. I. l'hams. SeE, 64:1729, 1975. 1979.
42. Mannitten, V., et at.: Altered absorption of digoxin in pa- 66. Rosenblatt. i.E., et at.: Comparison of/n vitro activity and
clinical phartivacology of donycycline and other tetracy-
tients given propantheline and i netoclopratiside. Lancet,
clines. Antiutsictob. Agents Chentothe. 1966, p 134.
1:398, 1973-
67, Welling, PG.: The influence of food on the absorption of
43. Osman, NI., and Welling, P.O.: Influence of propantheline antimicrobial agents. J. Anlimicrr'ub. Chemother., 9.7,
and nrctc'clopranide oil the bioavailahiltty of cltlorothia-
ziuie. Cure. Then. Res., 34:404, 1983. 1982.
44 Levy, G., MacGillivray, M.H., and Procknal, l.A.: Ri- 68. Ekcnved, G., ri al.: Influence of food on the effect of
prcmpantheline and I.hyoncyarnsitie on salivation. Scand. J.
boflavin absorption in children with thyroid disorders. Pe-
diatrics, 50.896. 1972, Gastroentetul.. 12:963, 1977.
45 VanHees, PAM.. CI xl.: Influence of intestittal transit tithe 69. Shepard. A.M.M.. Ii-vine, NA.. and Ludden.T.M.: Effect
of food on hli'u..nd hadralacine levels. Cl/n. Phartiutcol,
on azo-reduction irfsalicyarosulphaplridine. Gut, 20:309.
1979. Then, 36:14. 1984.
39
(;astri,inteslinal Absorption- Biologic Consicknauions