What is the difference between

the HACCP and HARPC

The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was signed into law by the United States
Congress in 2011. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is mandated to implement
the FSMA new food safety regulations.The essence of FSMA proposed rules is
prevention; i.e., a shift from a reactive to a protective and preventative approach. With
the globalization of the food supply chain and emerging new food safety risks, it is no
longer “what will you do if” but instead becoming “what will you do when” to
proactively minimize and/or prevent potential for contamination of food and also
.minimize food recalls across our food supply chain

Under the FSMA act, the FDA now has a legislative mandate to require
comprehensive, science-based preventive controls across the food supply chain. This
means that all food facilities that fall under the FSMA act must conduct Hazard
Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls ​(HARPC)​ and shall establish
.science-based preventive control measures to reduce the risk of food contamination

:The primary focus for all food processors now should be twofold

To understand how the risk-based preventive control rules compare to ​HACCP

,principles, and
To establish process controls in order to achieve and maintain compliance with the
.new FSMA law for preventing risk of food contamination
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point ​(HACCP)​ and current Good Manufacturing
Practices (cGMP) are essentially designed to ensure that food is manufactured,
processed, packaged and stored in sanitary conditions to prevent post-process
contamination in order to ensure that the food is safe, wholesome, and without visible
.quality deterioration

The​ HARPC​ plan has a similar concept and goal, but the approach is different from
cGMP and ​HACCP​, as ​HARPC​ enforces preventive controls in order to identify
potential risks or threats to the food supply and to implement appropriate corrective
actions proactively to prevent contamination. The FDA will establish science-based
standards for conducting a hazard analysis, and implementing and documenting
.preventive controls

A “qualified individual “or a “team of qualified individuals” from a facility is required

to understand the significant food safety hazards and put in place preventive controls
to minimize the risk of hazards. Although the proposed ​HARPC​ aligns well with the
HACCP​ plan, it differs in part in that the science or risk-based preventive controls,
rather than critical control points, are required. Therefore, the establishment of critical
limits would not be required under the ​HARPC​. However, the validity of preventive
controls for minimizing the significant food risks should be backed up by the
demonstrated or “tried and true” scientific data or authentic scientific literature. A
HACCP​ plan is not mandatory but the FSMA ​HARPC​ is mandated by law under the
.FSMA act

?What hazards should be identified for ​HARPC

.Biological, chemical, physical and radiological hazards
Natural toxins, pesticides, drug residues, decomposition, parasites, allergens, and
.unapproved food and color additives
.Naturally occurring hazards or unintentionally introduced hazards
.(Intentionally introduced hazards (including acts of terrorism
What examples of types of preventive Controls are listed in FSMA for the ​HARPC
?provision
.Sanitation procedures at food surface contact points
.Sanitation of utensils and equipment
.Staff hygiene training
.(Environmental monitoring program (for pathogen controls
.Food allergen control program
.Recall plan
Current Good Manufacturing Practices(cGM
.Supplier verification activities
?Who is exempt from ​HARPC
:The following categories are exempted from the ​HARPC​ plan requirement

Facilities under USDA jurisdiction handling, processing, and shipping meat, poultry,
.eggs, etc
.Operations under the FDA’s Seafood and Juice ​HACCP​ regulations
Facilities subject to the FDA’s new standards for Produce Safety Authorities. This
exemption applies to farms, cooperatives, growers, harvesters and other companies
.handling raw fresh fruits and vegetables
.Low acid and acidified canned food processors
.Facilities defined as “small” or “very small” businesses
Facilities with a previous 3-year average product value or revenue of less than
.$500,000
Facilities that mainly produce food for animals, store raw agricultural commodities
other than fruits and vegetables intended for further processing, or facilities that store
.packaged food not exposed to the environment for potential cross-contamination
Facilities that are mainly engaged in manufacturing, processing, packing or holding
that are considered to be low risk operations, such as shelling and hulling of almonds
.
.Retail food establishments, restaurants, and farms
?Who needs a ​HARPC​ plan
Any facility that manufactures, processes, packs, distributes, receives, holds or
imports food must develop a ​HARPC​ plan for compliance with the FSMA ​HARPC
.compliance

Except as exempted above, all facilities subjected to the FDA’s Bioterrorism Facility
Establishment registration, both in the United States and abroad, that are producing
food products for distribution in the United States must develop and implement a
HARPC​ plan that identifies risks “known or reasonably foreseeable” for each type of
food subject to the regulation. The preventive controls should be adequate to
“significantly minimize or prevent” identified hazards so that the food is safe. The
facility must provide a ​HARPC​ plan to the FDA upon receiving an oral or written
.request

?When was the ​HARPC​ plan implemented

FSMA ​HARPC​ was made into law on July 4, 2012. However, the FDA issued a
proposed rule implementing the hazard analysis and risk-based preventive control
.provisions of the FSMA act on January 2013

?How frequently does the ​HARPC​ need to be updated and submitted to the FDA
The FDA requires that a facility update its HARPC plan every 3 years or whenever
there is a significant change in the processing facility that may increase a potential
hazard or introduce a new hazard. Additionally, the FDA under the FSMA statute may
require an updated plan based on unintentional or new hazards associated with
biological, chemical, radiological or terrorist threats that may occur at a food facility
.that manufactures, processes, packs or holds food intended for human consumption

What consequences can the FDA impose if no ​HARPC​ plan is in place or the plan is
?inadequate
If a facility mandated to develop a HARPC plan does not create a plan or if the FDA
inspector determines that a ​HARPC​ plan is inadequate to address threats, the FDA
:can

Issue a public warning letter and/or an import alert for a foreign supplier, effectively
banning imports from such a foreign supplier. Food products from a foreign facility or
supplier that is placed on the import alert would be detained at US ports on arrival,
thereby effectively barring it from entering into US commerce until the FDA reviews
.and approves an updated HARPC plan
Criminally charge a corporation or the person in charge of a facility for failing to meet
.HARPC​ compliance
Suspend the facility’s food facility registration, thus preventing the facility from
distributing food in the US until the FDA approves the updated plan and corrective
actions. This would take place if food from a non-compliant facility is found to pose a
.significant food safety risk
In terms of validating process control, will the FDA be flexible in accepting
?tried-and-true operations or will new studies need to be conducted
The FDA may accept tried–and-true operations. For example, process controls such
as an internal temperature of 165°F or a pH level that is less than 4.6 or a water
activity of less than 0.85 have been scientifically proven to eliminate the risk of certain
pathogens associated with a cook process. Trade association data or published data
can also be used to show that the controls for your process have been supported by
.established scientific data and literature
New studies would be required if your process or product is new or novel and there is
no scientific data or literature available to validate the effectiveness of process
.controls at mitigating hazards
Under the proposed act, the FDA will review and evaluate relevant data, at least every
two years, to determine which foodborne contaminants present the greatest food
safety risk and issue relevant guidance documents, regulations and preventive action
.levels
Under the proposed act, the FDA will review and evaluate relevant data, at least every
two years, to determine which foodborne contaminants present the greatest food
safety risk and issue relevant guidance documents, regulations and preventive action
.levels
References
www.FDA.gov/FSMA
(The David Acheson Group – (various documents for their website
(FSMA Friday (Various Webinars

Material presented in this article is summarized from various resources available on

the public domain and references mentioned herein, therefore, these are not the views
or recommendations of this newsletter; and it solely intended for information
purposes only. It is not intended as professional advice and should not be construed
as such

‫؟‬HARPC ‫ و‬HACCP ‫ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ اﻟﻔﺮق ﺑﯿﻦ‬

‫ ﺗﻢ‬.2011 ‫( ﻟﯿﺼﺒﺢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮ ًﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗِﺒﻞ ﻛﻮﻧﻐﺮس اﻟﻮﻻﯾﺎت اﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪة ﻓﻲ ﻋﺎم‬FSMA) ‫ﺗﻢ اﻟﺘﻮﻗﯿﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ﺗﺤﺪﯾﺚ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‬
‫ اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻫﻮ‬FSMA ‫ إن ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ‬.‫ اﻟﺠﺪﯾﺪة ﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‬FSMA ‫( ﺑﺘﻨﻔﯿﺬ ﻟﻮاﺋﺢ‬FDA) ‫ﺗﻜﻠﯿﻒ إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ‬
‫ ﻣﻊ ﻋﻮﻟﻤﺔ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ اﻹﻣﺪاد ﺑﺎﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﻨﺎﺷﺌﺔ اﻟﺠﺪﯾﺪة‬.‫اﻟﻮﻗﺎﯾﺔ ؛ أي اﻟﺘﺤﻮل ﻣﻦ رد اﻟﻔﻌﻞ إﻟﻰ اﻟﻨﻬﺞ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﻲ واﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﻲ‬
‫ أو ﻣﻨﻊ اﺣﺘﻤﺎل ﺗﻠﻮث اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‬/ ‫ ﻟﻢ ﺗﻌﺪ "ﻣﺎذا ﺳﺘﻔﻌﻞ إذا" ﺑﻞ أﺻﺒﺤﺖ "ﻣﺎذا ﺳﺘﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ" ﻟﺘﻘﻠﯿﻞ و‬، ‫اﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺴﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‬
ً
.‫وأﯾﻀﺎ ﻗﻠﻞ ﻣﻦ اﺳﺘﺮﺟﺎع اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ ﻋﺒﺮ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ إﻣﺪادﻧﺎ اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ‬ ‫ﺑﺸﻜﻞ اﺳﺘﺒﺎﻗﻲ‬

‫ اﻵن ﺗﻔﻮﯾﺾ ﺗﺸﺮﯾﻌﻲ ﯾﺘﻄﻠﺐ ﺿﻮاﺑﻂ وﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ إﻟﻰ اﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﺒﺮ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ‬FDA ‫ أﺻﺒﺢ ﻟﺪى‬، FSMA ‫ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن‬
‫ ﯾﺠﺐ أن ﺗﻘﻮم ﺑﺘﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ واﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ‬FSMA ‫ ﻫﺬا ﯾﻌﻨﻲ أن ﺟﻤﯿﻊ اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻘﻊ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن‬.‫اﻹﻣﺪاد اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﻲ‬
.‫(​ وأن ﺗﻀﻊ ﺗﺪاﺑﯿﺮ رﻗﺎﺑﺔ وﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ إﻟﻰ اﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﺤﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﻠﻮث اﻟﻐﺬاء‬HARPC) ‫اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻤﺴﺘﻨﺪة إﻟﻰ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ‬

:‫ﯾﺠﺐ أن ﯾﻜﻮن اﻟﺘﺮﻛﯿﺰ اﻷﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻟﺠﻤﯿﻊ اﻟﻤﻌﺎﻟﺠﺎت اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ اﻵن ذا ﺷﻘﯿﻦ‬

، ‫ﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﯿﻔﯿﺔ ﻣﻘﺎرﻧﺔ ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ اﻟﺮﻗﺎﺑﺔ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺒﺎدئ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ وﻧﻘﺎط اﻟﻤﺮاﻗﺒﺔ اﻟﺤﺮﺟﺔ‬
.‫ اﻟﺠﺪﯾﺪ ﻟﻤﻨﻊ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺗﻠﻮث اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‬FSMA ‫ﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ واﻟﻤﺤﺎﻓﻈﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻻﻣﺘﺜﺎل ﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮن‬
‫ﺗﻢ ﺗﺼﻤﯿﻢ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ وﻧﻘﻄﺔ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ اﻟﺤﺮﺟﺔ ​)‪ (HACCP‬وﻣﻤﺎرﺳﺎت اﻟﺘﺼﻨﯿﻊ اﻟﺠﯿﺪة اﻟﺤﺎﻟﯿﺔ )‪ (cGMP‬ﺑﺸﻜﻞ أﺳﺎﺳﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻀﻤﺎن ﺗﺼﻨﯿﻊ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ وﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﺘﻬﺎ وﺗﻌﺒﺌﺘﻬﺎ وﺗﺨﺰﯾﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻇﺮوف ﺻﺤﯿﺔ ﻟﻤﻨﻊ ﺗﻠﻮث ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ ﻟﻀﻤﺎن ﺳﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺻﺤﯿﺔ‬
‫‪ ،‬ودون ﺗﺪﻫﻮر ﺟﻮدة ﻣﺮﺋﯿﺔ‪.‬‬

‫وﻫﺪﻓﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﯿﻦ ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻦ اﻟﻨﻬﺞ ﯾﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ‪ cGMP‬و ‪ ، HACCP‬ﺣﯿﺚ إن ‪ HARPC‬ﺗﻔﺮض‬ ‫ً‬ ‫ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺎ‬
‫ً‬ ‫ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺧﻄﺔ ‪HARPC‬‬
‫ﺿﻮاﺑﻂ وﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ ﺗﺤﺪﯾﺪ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ أو اﻟﺘﻬﺪﯾﺪات اﻟﻤﺤﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻹﻣﺪادات اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ وﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ اﻹﺟﺮاءات اﻟﺘﺼﺤﯿﺤﯿﺔ اﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ‬
‫اﺳﺘﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻟﻤﻨﻊ اﻟﺘﻠﻮث‪ .‬ﺳﺘﻀﻊ إدارة اﻟﻐﺬاء واﻟﺪواء اﻷﻣﺮﯾﻜﯿﺔ ﻣﻌﺎﯾﯿﺮ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ إﻟﻰ اﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻹﺟﺮاء ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ وﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ وﺗﻮﺛﯿﻖ‬
‫اﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻣﻄﻠﻮب "ﻓﺮد ﻣﺆﻫﻞ" أو "ﻓﺮﯾﻖ ﻣﻦ اﻷﻓﺮاد اﻟﻤﺆﻫﻠﯿﻦ" ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄة ﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻬﺎﻣﺔ ووﺿﻊ ﺿﻮاﺑﻂ وﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ‬
‫ﻟﺘﻘﻠﯿﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻷﺧﻄﺎر‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮاﻓﻖ ‪ HARPC‬اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮح ﺟﯿﺪًا ﻣﻊ ﺧﻄﺔ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ وﻧﻘﻄﺔ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ اﻟﺤﺮﺟﺔ ​)‬
‫‪ ، (HACCP‬إﻻ أﻧﻪ ﯾﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﺰﺋﯿًﺎ ﻋﻦ اﻟﺤﺎﺟﺔ إﻟﻰ اﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻌﻠﻢ ‪ ،‬ﺑﺪ ًﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺎط اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ اﻟﺤﺮﺟﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ‪ ،‬ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮن ﻫﻨﺎك ﺣﺎﺟﺔ إﻟﻰ وﺿﻊ ﺣﺪود ﺣﺮﺟﺔ ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ ‪ .HARPC‬وﻣﻊ ذﻟﻚ ‪ ،‬ﯾﻨﺒﻐﻲ دﻋﻢ ﺻﺤﺔ اﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﻠﯿﻞ إﻟﻰ أدﻧﻰ ﺣﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻬﺎﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﯿﺎﻧﺎت اﻟﻌﻠﻤﯿﺔ اﻟﻤﺜﺒﺘﺔ أو "اﻟﻤﺠﺮﺑﺔ واﻟﺤﻘﯿﻘﯿﺔ" أو اﻟﻤﺆﻟﻔﺎت اﻟﻌﻠﻤﯿﺔ اﻷﺻﻠﯿﺔ‪ .‬ﺧﻄﺔ ‪HACCP‬‬
‫ﻟﯿﺴﺖ إﻟﺰاﻣﯿﺔ وﻟﻜﻦ ‪ FSMA ​HARPC‬ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ اﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮن ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ‪.FSMA‬‬

‫ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﺘﻲ ﯾﺠﺐ ﺗﺤﺪﯾﺪﻫﺎ ﻟـ ‪HARPC‬؟‬

‫اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﺒﯿﻮﻟﻮﺟﯿﺔ واﻟﻜﯿﻤﯿﺎﺋﯿﺔ واﻟﻔﯿﺰﯾﺎﺋﯿﺔ واﻹﺷﻌﺎﻋﯿﺔ‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﺴﻤﻮم اﻟﻄﺒﯿﻌﯿﺔ ‪ ،‬واﻟﻤﺒﯿﺪات اﻟﺤﺸﺮﯾﺔ ‪ ،‬وﺑﻘﺎﯾﺎ اﻟﻤﺨﺪرات ‪ ،‬واﻟﺘﺤﻠﻞ ‪ ،‬واﻟﻄﻔﯿﻠﯿﺎت ‪ ،‬واﻟﻤﻮاد اﻟﻤﺜﯿﺮة ﻟﻠﺤﺴﺎﺳﯿﺔ ‪ ،‬واﻟﻤﻀﺎﻓﺎت‬
‫اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ ﻏﯿﺮ اﻟﻤﻮاﻓﻖ ﻋﻠﯿﻬﺎ واﻟﻠﻮن‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺤﺪث ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻃﺒﯿﻌﻲ أو اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﺘﻲ ﯾﺘﻢ إدﺧﺎﻟﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻏﯿﺮ ﻗﺼﺪ‪.‬‬
‫اﻷﺧﻄﺎر اﻟﻤﺘﻌﻤﺪة ﻋﻤﺪا )ﺑﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ذﻟﻚ أﻋﻤﺎل اﻹرﻫﺎب(‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ أﻣﺜﻠﺔ أﻧﻮاع اﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻤﺪرﺟﺔ ﻓﻲ ‪ FSMA‬ﻟﺘﻮﻓﯿﺮ ‪HARPC‬؟‬
‫إﺟﺮاءات اﻟﺼﺮف اﻟﺼﺤﻲ ﻓﻲ ﻧﻘﺎط اﺗﺼﺎل ﺳﻄﺢ اﻟﻄﻌﺎم‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﺼﺮف اﻟﺼﺤﻲ ﻟﻸواﻧﻲ واﻟﻤﻌﺪات‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﺪرﯾﺐ اﻟﻨﻈﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻇﻔﯿﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ اﻟﺮﺻﺪ اﻟﺒﯿﺌﻲ )ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻮاﻣﻞ اﻟﻤﻤﺮﺿﺔ(‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺞ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺤﺔ اﻟﻤﻮاد اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻤﺜﯿﺮة ﻟﻠﺤﺴﺎﺳﯿﺔ‪.‬‬
‫أذﻛﺮ ﺧﻄﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻤﺎرﺳﺎت اﻟﺘﺼﻨﯿﻊ اﻟﺠﯿﺪة اﻟﺤﺎﻟﯿﺔ )‪.(cGMPs‬‬
‫أﻧﺸﻄﺔ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﻮردﯾﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﻌﻔﻰ ﻣﻦ ‪HARPC‬؟‬
‫اﻟﻔﺌﺎت اﻟﺘﺎﻟﯿﺔ ﻣﻌﻔﺎة ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﻄﻠﺒﺎت ﺧﻄﺔ ‪:HARPC‬‬

‫اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﺨﺎﺿﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﻻﯾﺔ اﻟﻘﻀﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﻟﻮزارة اﻟﺰراﻋﺔ اﻷﻣﺮﯾﻜﯿﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﺔ ‪ ،‬ﺷﺤﻦ ‪ ،‬اﻟﻠﺤﻮم ‪ ،‬اﻟﺪواﺟﻦ ‪ ،‬اﻟﺒﯿﺾ ‪ ،‬إﻟﺦ‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺎت ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ ﻟﻮاﺋﺢ ‪ HACCP‬ﻟﻠﻤﺄﻛﻮﻻت اﻟﺒﺤﺮﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﺼﺎﺋﺮ‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﺨﺎﺿﻌﺔ ﻟﻤﻌﺎﯾﯿﺮ إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ اﻟﺠﺪﯾﺪة ﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎت ﺳﻼﻣﺔ اﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺎت‪ .‬ﯾﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻫﺬا اﻹﻋﻔﺎء ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻤﺰارع واﻟﺘﻌﺎوﻧﯿﺎت‬
‫واﻟﻤﺰارﻋﯿﻦ واﻟﺤﺼﺎدات واﻟﺸﺮﻛﺎت اﻷﺧﺮى اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻊ اﻟﻔﻮاﻛﻪ واﻟﺨﻀﺮوات اﻟﻄﺎزﺟﺔ اﻟﻨﯿﺌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﺎﻣﺾ ﻣﻨﺨﻔﺾ وﺣﺎﻣﺾ ﻟﻸﻃﻌﻤﺔ اﻟﻤﻌﻠﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﻤﻌ ّﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺄﻧﻬﺎ أﻋﻤﺎل "ﺻﻐﯿﺮة" أو "ﺻﻐﯿﺮة ﺟﺪًا"‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﺴﻬﯿﻼت ﻣﻊ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﯿﻤﺔ اﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ اﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ أو إﯾﺮادات أﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 3‬ﺳﻨﻮات أﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 500،000‬دوﻻر‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻨﺘﺞ اﻟﻐﺬاء ﻟﻠﺤﯿﻮاﻧﺎت ﺑﺸﻜﻞ أﺳﺎﺳﻲ ‪ ،‬ﺗﺨﺰن اﻟﺴﻠﻊ اﻟﺰراﻋﯿﺔ اﻟﺨﺎم ﺑﺨﻼف اﻟﻔﻮاﻛﻪ واﻟﺨﻀﺮوات اﻟﻤﻌﺪة ﻟﻤﺰﯾﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫اﻟﻤﻌﺎﻟﺠﺔ ‪ ،‬أو اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺨﺰن اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ اﻟﻤﻌﺒﺄة اﻟﺘﻲ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻌﺮض ﻟﻠﺒﯿﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ أﺟﻞ اﻟﺘﻠﻮث اﻟﻤﺤﺘﻤﻞ اﻟﻤﺤﺘﻤﻞ‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ رﺋﯿﺴﻲ ﻓﻲ اﻟﺘﺼﻨﯿﻊ أو اﻟﺘﺠﻬﯿﺰ أو اﻟﺘﻌﺒﺌﺔ أو اﻟﺤﺠﺰ واﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﯿﺎت ﻣﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ‬
‫اﻟﻘﺼﻒ وﺗﻘﺸﯿﺮ اﻟﻠﻮز‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺎت اﻟﺒﯿﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺠﺰﺋﺔ واﻟﻤﻄﺎﻋﻢ واﻟﻤﺰارع‪.‬‬
 ‫ﻣﻦ ﯾﺤﺘﺎج ﻟﺨﻄﺔ ‪HARPC‬؟‬
‫ﯾﺠﺐ أن ﺗﻀﻊ أي ﻣﻨﺸﺄة ﺗﻘﻮم ﺑﺘﺼﻨﯿﻊ أو ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﺔ أو ﺣﺰم أو ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ أو اﺳﺘﻼم أو ﺣﺠﺰ أو اﺳﺘﯿﺮاد ﻃﻌﺎم ﺧﻄﺔ ‪ HARPC‬ﻟﻼﻣﺘﺜﺎل‬
‫ﻻﻣﺘﺜﺎل ‪.FSMA ​HARPC‬‬

‫ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎء ﻣﺎ ﺗﻢ إﻋﻔﺎؤه أﻋﻼه ‪ ،‬ﯾﺠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻤﯿﻊ اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂت اﻟﺨﺎﺿﻌﺔ ﻟﺘﺴﺠﯿﻞ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﺔ ﻣﺮﻓﻖ اﻹرﻫﺎب اﻟﺒﯿﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ اﻟﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﻹدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‬
‫واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮاء ﻓﻲ اﻟﻮﻻﯾﺎت اﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪة أو ﺧﺎرﺟﻬﺎ ‪ ،‬واﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺎت ﻏﺬاﺋﯿﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻮزﯾﻊ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻮﻻﯾﺎت اﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪة ‪ ،‬وﺿﻊ وﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ ﺧﻄﺔ‬
‫‪ HARPC‬ﺗﺤﺪد اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ "اﻟﻤﻌﺮوﻓﺔ أو اﻟﻤﺘﻮﻗﻌﺔ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻌﻘﻮل "ﻟﻜﻞ ﻧﻮع ﻣﻦ اﻟﻤﻮاد اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﺨﺎﺿﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻨﻈﯿﻢ‪ .‬ﯾﺠﺐ أن ﺗﻜﻮن‬
‫اﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﻛﺎﻓﯿﺔ "ﻟﺘﻘﻠﯿﻞ أو ﻣﻨﻊ" اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ اﻟﻤﺤﺪدة ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ ﺣﺘﻰ ﯾﻜﻮن اﻟﻐﺬاء آﻣﻨًﺎ‪ .‬ﯾﺠﺐ أن ﯾﻘﺪم اﻟﻤﺮﻓﻖ ﺧﻄﺔ‬
‫‪ HARPC‬إﻟﻰ إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﻓﻮر ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺷﻔﻬﻲ أو ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﻣﺘﻰ ﺗﻢ ﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ ﺧﻄﺔ ‪HARPC‬؟‬

‫ﺗﻢ ﺗﺤﻮﯾﻞ ‪ FSMA ​HARPC‬إﻟﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ﻓﻲ ‪ 4‬ﯾﻮﻟﯿﻮ ‪ .2012‬وﻣﻊ ذﻟﻚ ‪ ،‬أﺻﺪرت إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﻗﺎﻋﺪة ﻣﻘﺘﺮﺣﺔ ﻟﺘﻨﻔﯿﺬ‬
‫ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ وأﺣﻜﺎم اﻟﺮﻗﺎﺑﺔ اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ اﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ‪ FSMA‬ﻓﻲ ﯾﻨﺎﯾﺮ ‪.2013‬‬

‫ﻛﻢ ﻣﺮة ﺗﺤﺘﺎج ‪ HARPC‬إﻟﻰ اﻟﺘﺤﺪﯾﺚ وﺗﻘﺪﯾﻤﻬﺎ إﻟﻰ إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ؟‬
‫ﺗﺘﻄﻠﺐ إدارة اﻟﻐﺬاء واﻟﺪواء )‪ (FDA‬أن ﺗﻘﻮم اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄة ﺑﺘﺤﺪﯾﺚ ﺧﻄﺘﻬﺎ ‪ HARPC‬ﻛﻞ ‪ 3‬ﺳﻨﻮات أو ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﯾﻜﻮن ﻫﻨﺎك ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﻣﻨﺸﺄة اﻟﻤﻌﺎﻟﺠﺔ اﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺰﯾﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻣﺤﺘﻤﻞ أو ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﺧﻄﺮا ﺟﺪﯾﺪا‪ .‬ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ إﻟﻰ ذﻟﻚ ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺗﻄﻠﺐ إدارة اﻟﻐﺬاء واﻟﺪواء‬
‫اﻷﻣﺮﯾﻜﯿﺔ )‪ (FDA‬ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن ‪ FSMA‬ﺧﻄﺔ ﻣﺤﺪّﺛﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ إﻟﻰ أﺧﻄﺎر ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﻘﺼﻮدة أو ﺟﺪﯾﺪة ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻬﺪﯾﺪات اﻟﺒﯿﻮﻟﻮﺟﯿﺔ‬
‫أو اﻟﻜﯿﻤﯿﺎﺋﯿﺔ أو اﻹﺷﻌﺎﻋﯿﺔ أو اﻹرﻫﺎﺑﯿﺔ اﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺤﺪث ﻓﻲ ﻣﻨﺸﺄة أﻏﺬﯾﺔ ﺗﻘﻮم ﺑﺘﺼﻨﯿﻊ أو ﺗﺠﻬﯿﺰ أو ﺣﺰم أو ﺣﻔﻆ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ اﻟﻤﺨﺼﺼﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻼﺳﺘﻬﻼك اﻟﺒﺸﺮي‪.‬‬

‫ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ اﻟﻌﻮاﻗﺐ اﻟﺘﻲ ﯾﻤﻜﻦ أن ﺗﻔﺮﺿﻬﺎ ادارة اﻻﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﺪم وﺟﻮد ﺧﻄﺔ ‪ HARPC‬أو ﻋﺪم ﻛﻔﺎﯾﺔ اﻟﺨﻄﺔ؟‬
‫إذا ﻛﺎﻧﺖ اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄة اﻟﻤﻜﻠﻔﺔ ﺑﺘﻄﻮﯾﺮ ﺧﻄﺔ ‪ HARPC‬ﻻ ﺗﻨﺸﺊ ﺧﻄﺔ أو إذا ﻗﺮر ﻣﻔﺘﺶ ‪ FDA‬أن ﺧﻄﺔ ‪ HARPC‬ﻏﯿﺮ ﻛﺎﻓﯿﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻤﻮاﺟﻬﺔ اﻟﺘﻬﺪﯾﺪات ‪ ،‬ﯾﻤﻜﻦ ﻟـ ‪:FDA‬‬

‫إﺻﺪار ﺧﻄﺎب ﺗﺤﺬﯾﺮ ﻋﺎم و ‪ /‬أو ﺗﻨﺒﯿﻪ اﺳﺘﯿﺮاد ﻟﻤﻮرد أﺟﻨﺒﻲ ‪ ،‬ﯾﺤﻈﺮ ﺑﺸﻜﻞ ﻓﻌﺎل اﻟﻮاردات ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬا اﻟﻤﻮرد اﻷﺟﻨﺒﻲ‪ .‬ﺳﯿﺘﻢ‬
‫اﺣﺘﺠﺎز اﻟﻤﻨﺘﺠﺎت اﻟﻐﺬاﺋﯿﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﺄة أو ﻣﻮرد أﺟﻨﺒﻲ ﯾﺘﻢ وﺿﻌﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﺗﺄﻫﺐ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﯿﺮاد ﻓﻲ اﻟﻤﻮاﻧﺊ اﻷﻣﺮﯾﻜﯿﺔ ﻟﺪى وﺻﻮﻟﻪ ‪،‬‬
‫وﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﻤﻨﻌﻪ ﻓﻌﻠﯿًﺎ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺪﺧﻮل ﻓﻲ اﻟﺘﺠﺎرة اﻷﻣﺮﯾﻜﯿﺔ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﻘﻮم إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﺑﻤﺮاﺟﻌﺔ واﻋﺘﻤﺎد ﺧﻄﺔ ‪HARPC‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﺤﺪﺛﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺮض رﺳﻮم ﺟﻨﺎﺋﯿﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺸﺮﻛﺔ أو اﻟﺸﺨﺺ اﻟﻤﺴﺆول ﻋﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﺄة ﻟﻔﺸﻠﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ اﻻﻣﺘﺜﺎل ﻻﻣﺘﺜﺎل ‪.HARPC‬‬
‫ﻗﻢ ﺑﺘﻌﻠﯿﻖ ﺗﺴﺠﯿﻞ ﻣﻨﺸﺄة اﻟﻄﻌﺎم ‪ ،‬وﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻨﻊ اﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄة ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻮﻻﯾﺎت اﻟﻤﺘﺤﺪة ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﻮاﻓﻖ إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺨﻄﺔ اﻟﻤﺤﺪﺛﺔ واﻹﺟﺮاءات اﻟﺘﺼﺤﯿﺤﯿﺔ‪ .‬ﻗﺪ ﯾﺤﺪث ﻫﺬا إذا ﺗﻢ اﻟﻌﺜﻮر ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻄﻌﺎم ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﺄة ﻏﯿﺮ ﻣﺘﻮاﻓﻘﺔ ﻟﺨﻄﺮ ﻛﺒﯿﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺳﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﯿﻤﺎ ﯾﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺤﺔ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻫﻞ ﺳﺘﻜﻮن إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﻣﺮﻧﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻗﺒﻮل اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺎت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺖ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫وﺻﺪﻗﻬﺎ أم ﺳﺘﺤﺘﺎج إﻟﻰ إﺟﺮاء دراﺳﺎت ﺟﺪﯾﺪة؟‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ادارة اﻻﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﯿﺎت ﻣﺠﺮﺑﺔ وﺣﻘﯿﻘﯿﺔ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﯿﻞ اﻟﻤﺜﺎل ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ ﻣﺜﻞ درﺟﺔ ﺣﺮارة داﺧﻠﯿﺔ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ‪ 165‬درﺟﺔ ﻓﻬﺮﻧﻬﺎﯾﺖ أو ﻣﺴﺘﻮى درﺟﺔ اﻟﺤﻤﻮﺿﺔ أﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 4.6‬أو ﻧﺸﺎط ﻣﺎء أﻗﻞ ﻣﻦ ‪ 0.85‬ﻗﺪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﯿًﺎ أﻧﻪ ﯾﺰﯾﻞ ﺧﻄﺮ‬
‫أﯾﻀﺎ اﺳﺘﺨﺪام ﺑﯿﺎﻧﺎت اﻻرﺗﺒﺎط اﻟﺘﺠﺎري أو اﻟﺒﯿﺎﻧﺎت اﻟﻤﻨﺸﻮرة ﻹﻇﻬﺎر أن‬ ‫ﺑﻌﺾ ﻣﺴﺒﺒﺎت اﻷﻣﺮاض اﻟﻤﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﺑﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ اﻟﻄﻬﻲ‪ .‬ﯾﻤﻜﻦ ً‬
‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ اﻟﺨﺎﺻﺔ ﺑﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻢ دﻋﻤﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼل اﻟﺒﯿﺎﻧﺎت اﻟﻌﻠﻤﯿﺔ واﻷدﺑﯿﺎت‪.‬‬
‫ﺳﺘﻜﻮن ﻫﻨﺎك ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻟﺪراﺳﺎت ﺟﺪﯾﺪة إذا ﻛﺎﻧﺖ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ أو اﻟﻤﻨﺘﺞ اﻟﺨﺎص ﺑﻚ ﺟﺪﯾﺪًا أو ﺟﺪﯾﺪًا وﻻ ﺗﺘﻮﻓﺮ ﺑﯿﺎﻧﺎت أو ﻣﺆﻟﻔﺎت ﻋﻠﻤﯿﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿﺔ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ اﻟﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻌﻤﻠﯿﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺨﻔﯿﻒ اﻟﻤﺨﺎﻃﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ اﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮن اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮح ‪ ،‬ﺳﺘﻘﻮم إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﺑﻤﺮاﺟﻌﺔ وﺗﻘﯿﯿﻢ اﻟﺒﯿﺎﻧﺎت ذات اﻟﺼﻠﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﯿﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻷﻗﻞ ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﺤﺪﯾﺪ‬
‫اﻟﻤﻠﻮﺛﺎت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﻬﺎ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺜﻞ أﻛﺒﺮ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ وإﺻﺪار وﺛﺎﺋﻖ وﻟﻮاﺋﺢ اﻟﺘﻮﺟﯿﻪ وﻣﺴﺘﻮﯾﺎت اﻹﺟﺮاءات‬
‫اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ذات اﻟﺼﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﻤﻮﺟﺐ اﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮن اﻟﻤﻘﺘﺮح ‪ ،‬ﺳﺘﻘﻮم إدارة اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﻌﻘﺎﻗﯿﺮ ﺑﻤﺮاﺟﻌﺔ وﺗﻘﯿﯿﻢ اﻟﺒﯿﺎﻧﺎت ذات اﻟﺼﻠﺔ ‪ ،‬ﻛﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﯿﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻷﻗﻞ ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﺤﺪﯾﺪ‬
‫اﻟﻤﻠﻮﺛﺎت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﻬﺎ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ واﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺜﻞ أﻛﺒﺮ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻼﻣﺔ اﻷﻏﺬﯾﺔ وإﺻﺪار وﺛﺎﺋﻖ وﻟﻮاﺋﺢ اﻟﺘﻮﺟﯿﻪ وﻣﺴﺘﻮﯾﺎت اﻹﺟﺮاءات‬
‫اﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﯿﺔ ذات اﻟﺼﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫اﻟﻤﺮاﺟﻊ‬
‫‪www.FDA.gov/FSMA‬‬
‫ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ ‪) - David Acheson‬وﺛﺎﺋﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻟﻤﻮﻗﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻮﯾﺐ(‬
‫‪) FSMA Friday‬ﻧﺪوات إﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﯿﺔ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ(‬

‫ﺗﻢ ﺗﻠﺨﯿﺺ اﻟﻤﻮاد اﻟﻤﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬه اﻟﻤﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ اﻟﻤﻮارد اﻟﻤﺘﺎﺣﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻤﺠﺎل اﻟﻌﺎم واﻟﻤﺮاﺟﻊ اﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮرة ﻫﻨﺎ ‪ ،‬وﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺬه‬
‫ﻟﯿﺴﺖ وﺟﻬﺎت ﻧﻈﺮ أو ﺗﻮﺻﯿﺎت ﻫﺬه اﻟﺮﺳﺎﻟﺔ اﻹﺧﺒﺎرﯾﺔ ؛ وﻫﻮ ﻣﺨﺼﺺ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻷﻏﺮاض اﻟﻤﻌﻠﻮﻣﺎت ﻓﻘﻂ‪ .‬ﻻ ﯾﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﯾﻢ اﻟﻤﺸﻮرة‬
‫اﻟﻤﻬﻨﯿﺔ وﻻ ﯾﺠﺐ ﺗﻔﺴﯿﺮه ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬا اﻟﻨﺤﻮ‪.‬‬

‫‪.‬‬