EMEA - Plasma - 672
EMEA - Plasma - 672
EMEA - Plasma - 672
• This document provides guidance on the structure and requirements for presentation of data on starting
material in a Plasma Master File (PMF). This guidance shall also apply when the PMF certification
scheme is not followed.
• The PMF structure follows Part III of Annex I of Commission Directive 2001/83/EC1 as amended. This
Guideline supersedes EC III/5272/94 “Contribution to Part II of the Structure of the Dossier for
Applications for Marketing Authorisation - Control of Starting Materials for the Production of Blood
Derivatives” and takes into account the consultation on the draft document released for consultation in July
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 2/16
GUIDELINE ON THE SCIENTIFIC DATA REQUIREMENTS FOR A PLASMA MASTER
FILE (PMF)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................... 12
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 15
ANNEXES - Doc. Ref: EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1 - Annexes (Published seperately)
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 3/16
INTRODUCTION AND PRINCIPLE OF A PMF
All starting materials for medicinal products should comply with the requirements as laid down in
Directive 2001/83/EC. This includes compliance with Ph. Eur. and GMP.
Annex I of Directive 2001/83/EC, amended by Directive 2003/63/EC7, lays down specific
requirements for the starting material of plasma-derived medicinal products. The concept of Plasma
Master File has been introduced and the principles, content, evaluation and certification are described.
Every blood establishment has to be approved by a Competent authority according to the Directive
2002/98/EC. Inspection and approval according to GMP is, in addition, required for processing,
storage and transport of blood and blood components, including plasma, to be used for manufacture of
medicinal products.
The PMF contains common information on plasma, from collection to plasma pool, relevant to the
manufacture of all intermediate fractions including cryoprecipitate, all constituents of the excipient
and all active substance(s), which are part of medicinal products or medical devices, for which this
PMF is applicable.
Cryoprecipitate or any other intermediates are not covered by the PMF certification procedure. The
manufacturing process starting from the pooled plasma is not part of the PMF dossier, this should be
described in the relevant sections of the dossier for each individual medicinal product, medical device
or investigational medicinal product.
The PMF should contain complete information in accordance with this guideline. There should be no
cross-reference to data held in other PMFs.
This Guideline describes the structure and scientific data required on plasma, from collection to
plasma pool, to be submitted in a PMF or included in the marketing authorisation dossier whenever
the PMF certification scheme is not followeda.
Applicants or MAHs using the PMF certification system need to clearly identify and make reference
to the PMF(s) in the dossier of each medicinal product. Reference to more than one PMF is possible
but this must be clearly indicated. Where information is specific to a particular product (e.g.
immunisation scheme used for specific immunoglobulins) this should be included in section 2. 3 S of
the dossier for the relevant product and not in the PMF, unless otherwise stated in this guideline.
The procedure for the submission, evaluation and certification is described in the Guideline on
Requirements for Plasma Master File (PMF) certification, EMEA/CPMP/BWP/4663/038.
Annual update
The PMF information shall be updated and re-submitted for approval on an annual basis. The
scientific documentation for the annual update should include the following:
• Summary of all changes and updates applied for with the annual update
• Annex I “check list on annual update”, including all the changes already approved during the
year, on-going variations and changes applied for with the annual update. Precise cross reference
(i.e. page/vol.) to the actual updated PMF dossier should be made.
• All outstanding commitments (follow up measures) and related data concerning previous
evaluations.
a
The term ‘PMF’ is now defined in legislation as stand alone documentation. Therefore, this term should no longer be used
when documentation is provided within a product dossier.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 4/16
• An integrated PMF dossier. This annual update should include all changes and updated
information since the last certification (initial or annual). (Note: changes to all lists and annexes
should be submitted with track changes.)
Ð Updated epidemiological data i.e. newly available data together with its scientific
evaluation.
Ð Updated sections 1.1b, 2.1.3 and 2.3c. In section 1.3, updated flow chart when applicable.
In addition, when relevant, update on deletions of country(ies) and/or
centres(s)/establishment(s) used for blood/plasma collection, or in which testing of
donation and plasma pools is carried out, and deletion of blood bag(s) may be submitted
at the annual update. The reason for the deletion should be specified.
Ð Update of inspection/audit status of blood establishments (see Annexes II, III, IV and V).
Ð Update on the participation in proficiency studies for plasma pool testing (viral marker
and NAT testing, see section 2.2.2).
• List including:
• Cases, over the previous year, for which it was retrospectively found there were
indications that a donation contributing to a plasma pool was infected with HIV or
hepatitis A, B or Cd.
• The number of positive donations that have been identified per viral marker by NAT
(Nucleic Acid Amplification Technique) testing at the fractionator level including
minipool testing. If NAT testing of minipools is performed by the PMF holder, results of
the NAT testing should be provided, including the number of minipools tested and
positive donations identified.
Specify historic information where this is still relevant for batches that may be on the market e.g.
information on the period when an establishment or centre was actively supplying plasma.
The Plasma Master File shall provide a list of the medicinal products for which the Plasma Master File
is valid, whether the medicinal products have been granted a marketing authorisation or are in the
process of being granted such an authorisation, with the relevant Competent Authority(ies) for each
plasma-derived product. This list should also include medical devices incorporating stable derivatives
of human blood or human plasma (Council Directive 93/42/EEC9 as amended) and investigational
medicinal products referred to in Article 2 of Directive 2001/20/EC10.
Separate listings for these different categories of products should be submitted.
A list of cryoprecipitates and intermediates in relation to this PMF should also be available stating
their destination.
In addition, a list of medicinal products incorporating stable derivatives of human blood or human
plasma (e.g. active substances, excipients, stabilisers) should be also submitted whenever contracts
and/or agreements exist between the PMF holder and third companies. When the final product is not
known to the PMF holder, because intermediates are sold to other companies, a list of these
cryoprecipitates and intermediates should be submitted.
b
This product-list is also part of the PMF application form and valid PMF certificate. This list should be kept up-to-date to
allow a link between finished products and the plasma source. The updates to this list are not considered variations.
Independently, all MAHs incorporating a new plasma source, with consequent changes to the manufacturing process starting
from the pooled plasma, will need to apply for a variation to the Marketing Authorisation in accordance with the Commission
Regulation (EC) No 1085/2003.20 In other cases where a new plasma source is incorporated, the need for a variation to the
MA will depend on the impact on the finished product.
c
Changes to these sections are not considered variations but updated information to the previous PMF (initial/annual update).
d
This is in addition to the requirement that Marketing Authorisation Holders inform relevant Medicines Competent
Authority(ies) without delay of any cases where there are indications that a donation contributing to a plasma pool was
infected with HIV or hepatitis in accordance with the Note for Guidance on Plasma-derived medicinal products,
EMEA/CPMP/BWP/269/95 (current version, section 2.3).
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 5/16
1.2 Overall safety strategy
A critical evaluation of the contribution of each of the significant steps, from collection of
blood/plasma to preparation of the plasma pool, to the overall safety of the plasma pool should be
provided. It should demonstrate how different aspects of the PMF interrelate and contribute to the
overall safety of the plasma. This critical evaluation should incorporate all aspects of the PMF and
draw together the following information: the epidemiological data on blood transmissible infections
known for the donor population, criteria for the use of donations from first time donors (when
applicable), the system of donor selection criteria including measures that reduce the risk of (v)CJD,
screening of donations, minipool strategy if relevant, the testing of the plasma pools, viral load limits
for plasma pools and normal size of plasma pool, inventory hold and “look-back” procedures. The
critical evaluation should be supported by diagrams, e.g. to describe the plasma donation test system
and strategy of (mini/plasma) pool testing. The aim should be to demonstrate how the company’s
strategy integrates to robustly ensure that all measures taken throughout the collection, processing,
testing, storage and transport of the plasma work together to provide a safe plasma pool.
The estimated residual risk of missing viraemic donations that may enter the production pool should
be described11.
A flow-chart, describing the complete supply-chain for plasma from collection to the manufacture of
the plasma pool, should be provided. This should include all relevant establishments involved in the
collection, testing, processing, storage and transport of blood or plasma and the relation between them.
The flow chart should describe the complete transport chain including details of international transport
and customs. If applicable indicate the country of import into the EU.
The quality and safety of products derived from human plasma rely both on the source plasma material
and the further manufacturing processes. Therefore, the collection, testing, processing, storage and
transport of human plasma are major factors in the quality assurance of the manufacture of plasma-
derived products. Blood establishments and centres should fulfil the requirements and be inspected
and approved in accordance with the Blood Directive (2002/98/EC) and corresponding Commission
directives (2004/33/EC, 2005/61/EC and 2005/62/EC) for collection and testing and in accordance
with GMP Directive 2003/94/EC12, Annex 14 of the EU Guide to GMP, and Ph. Eur. for all other
activities.
If a blood establishment uses mobile or temporary equipped centres to collect blood or plasma, these
centres should operate under the same quality system as the establishment they are connected to.
An exhaustive list of names and addresses of blood establishments and centrese in which collection
and/or testing, storage and transport of donations and testing of plasma pools is carried out, including
any sub contractors should be provided using the tabular format given in the annexes II, III, IV and V.
e
Centres which include permanent and full equipment.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 6/16
An exhaustive list of names and addresses of blood establishments and centres, from which plasma is
still available, should be provided using the tabular format given in annex II.
If mobile or temporary equipped centres are used, the relationship with their respective blood
establishments should be briefly described in the PMF. A statement should be provided that these
mobile and temporary centres operate under the same quality system as the blood establishment they
are related to.
The suppliers of plasma, for which special criteriaf are applicable (such as anti-D), should also be
identified.
The collection and processing operations of the blood establishments and centres should be described
and summarised in this section.
To show that plasma is sourced from establishments approved in accordance with the previously
mentioned legislation, indicate date and final outcome of last inspection.
If establishments or centres are no longer used, or are temporarily not used, they should be listed in a
stand-alone table indicating the date when use of the centre or establishment has ceased and the reasong.
The information should be kept in the list as long as the plasma is in stock.
If there is a separate look back department, the address, duties, and approval status by EU competent
authorities should be mentioned.
b. Characteristics of donations
For any establishment responsible for collection it should be specified whether the donors are non-
remunerated or remunerated. The nature of any compensation for donation should be described if
applicable. “A donation is considered voluntary and non-remunerated if the person gives blood,
plasma or cellular components of his/her own free will and receives no payment of it, either in the
form of cash or in kind which could be considered a substitute for money. This would include time off
work other than that reasonably needed for the donation and travel. Small tokens, refreshments and
reimbursements of direct travel costs are compatible with voluntary, non-remunerated donations.”
2.1.2 Information on centres or establishments in which testing of donations and plasma pools is
carried out, including inspection and approval status.
Confirm for each establishment or centre the compliance with the selection/exclusion criteria for
blood/plasma donors in Directive 2001/83/EC, Directive 2002/98/EC, Directive 2004/33/EC and the
requirements of the European Pharmacopoeia Monographs. Where appropriate, indicate compliance
with CHMP guidance documents, WHO and Council of Europe recommendations. With regard to
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, the exclusion criteria should be stated explicitly in compliance with CHMP
position statement on Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and plasma-derived and urine-derived medicinal
f
The immunisation of donors should be described in the specific dossier of the product.
g
It is sufficient to indicate that the closure was for commercial reasons. However, if the closure was for safety reasons, then
details are required.
h
It is sufficient to indicate that the closure was for commercial reasons. However, if the closure was for safety reasons, then
details are required.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 7/16
product (EMEA/CPMP/BWP/2879/02)13. In addition, specify any requirements versus emerging
infectious agents in a specific country of collection and confirm that selection/exclusion criteria for
blood/plasma donors are in compliance with such requirements.
2.1.4 System in place which enables the path taken by each donation to be traced from the
blood/plasma collection establishment through to finished products and vice versa.
Summarize the system in place, which enables the path taken by each donation to be traced from the
blood/plasma collection establishment through to finished products, including testing facility and vice
versa. Confirm compliance with Directives 2002/98/EC, 2005/61/EC, 2005/62/EC and GMP Directive
2003/94/EC and Annex 14 of the EU Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice14 especially concerning
traceability including the identification procedures, labelling and record keeping. If several
establishments/countries are involved, the information is given for each system. Include information
on how traceability is maintained for closed collection establishments or centres, and/or
establishments or centres that are temporarily closed and/or have stopped delivering plasma.
Traceability, in accordance with the Blood Directive and corresponding Commission Directives,
should be guaranteed in all cases. Indicate, for closed blood establishments, who is the holder of
records.
Give information on steps that would be taken if it was found retrospectively that donation(s) should
have been excluded from processing (“look-back procedure”, any system in place to retain samples)
and justify the system in accordance with section 2.3.6 of the Guideline on Plasma-derived medicinal
products, EMEA/CPMP/BWP/269/9515 (current version).
Confirm compliance with the Ph. Eur. Monograph for Human Plasma for Fractionation and with any
requirements for particular products for which Ph. Eur. Monographs exist.
Describe the conditions for processing including freezing, and for storage of plasma for every
establishment or centre responsible for collecting blood/plasma. Compliance with the Ph. Eur.
requirements for freezing and storage should be included in Annex II, with an indication of whether
requirements for recovery of proteins that are labile or not labile in plasma are met.
Confirm validation of the freezing conditions.
2.2.2 Testing of blood/plasma donations and pools for infectious agents, including information
on test methods and, in the case of plasma pools, validation data on the tests used.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 8/16
When minipools of donations are tested, the rationale and full details of this testing should be
provided, including the size of the minipools.
It should be clarified whether all minipools/pools are tested in the same way (e.g. size of minipool,
types of viruses). If this is not the case, the different strategies should be described.
Criteria for acceptance or rejection of donation/pool and re-testing policy should be described (see also
Council Recommendation 98/463/EC16 annex V).
List of kits used for each test, including NAT testing.
Parameter Test Brand Manufacturer CE Used for Testing
method name of mark site
Individual Minipool
the kit (yes/no)
donations /Plasma
pool
HBsAg
HIV 1 and 2
Antibody
HCV
Antibody
NAT for
HCV RNA
B19 DNA
Other tests
a. Testing of donations
Confirm that tests on single donations are carried out in accordance with the manufacturers’ directions
for use. Copies of the instructions for use of commercial kits are not needed.
For CE-marked test kits submission of validation data is not required.
For non-CE-marked test kits, the applicant should demonstrate that they comply with equivalent
standards and can be considered “state of the art” according to the Common Technical Specifications
for in vitro-diagnostic medical devices, 2002/364/EC17, with particular attention to evidence for
seroconversion sensitivity and sub-type sensitivity in comparison with a CE-marked test kit.
a.2 NAT
In case of mini pool testing by NAT as part of the screening of individual donations, a brief
description of the analytical procedures for NAT methods should be provided if non-CE-marked tests
are used (in-house methods or commercial kits). A summary of the validation reports should also be
provided and should include specificity, detection limit and robustness. The description of the
analytical procedures and the summary of the validation are not required for mini pools testing by
NAT if the test is CE marked for this purpose. However, information on the detection limit, as related
to the single donation, should be provided.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 9/16
b. Viral marker testing of the plasma pool(s)
For every laboratory that carries out plasma pool testing for viral markers, provide a description of
each test method and the respective validation report according to the following guidelines:
Information on the sensitivity of the test for each marker as a function of pool size should also be
included.
All NAT methods used for plasma pool testing should comply with the requirements in Ph Eur
General Methods 2.6.21 Nucleic acid amplification techniques. For every laboratory that carries out
plasma pool testing by NAT, provide a description of each NAT test method and the respective
validation report.
NAT for HCV RNA is required by the Ph. Eur. Monograph “Human Plasma for Fractionation”.
Validation is carried out according to the Ph. Eur. Guidelines for validation of NAT for the detection
of HCV RNA in plasma pools (PA/PH/OMCL (98) 22, DEF). As recommended in this guideline, the
ability of the analytical procedure to detect all HCV genotypes is demonstrated.
If the list of plasma-derived products for which the PMF is valid includes anti-D immunoglobulin for
intravenous and/or intramuscular administration and/or human plasma (pooled and treated for virus
inactivation), NAT for B19 DNA is also carried out as required by the respective Ph. Eur.
Monographs. The maximum B19 virus burden should be in accordance with the current version of the
Ph. Eur. monograph. Validation is performed according to the guideline for validation of NAT for
quantitation of B19 virus DNA in plasma pools (PA/PH/OMCL (03) 38, DEF). Included in this
guideline is the recommendation that for the design of primers and probes the existence of the B19
variants A6 and V9 is taken into account. The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses
(ICTV) classifies these variants under B19 virus (Eighth report of the ICTV, Eds.: C.M. Fauquet,
M.A. Mayo et al., Elsevier, page 361).
In case that the applicant performs NAT testing for viruses other than HCV and B19 the validation
studies are carried out according to the following guidelines:
¾ ICH Topic Q2A Note for guidance on validation of analytical methods: definitions and
terminology (CPMP/ICH/381/95)20
¾ Ph. Eur. General method 2.6.21 “Nucleic acid amplification techniques”.
For practical purposes, in the case of NAT qualitative methods, validation is carried out taking into
consideration the above mentioned guideline Validation of NAT for the Detection of HCV RNA in
Plasma Pools. (PA/PH/OMCL (98) 22, DEF).
Provide information on specificity, including the ability of the assays to detect different genotypes, on
sensitivity and robustness.
Proficiency Studies
Participation in proficiency studies is strongly encouraged and should be reported (i.e. date, viral
markers).
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 10/16
2.2.3 Technical characteristics of bags for blood and plasma collection, including information
on anticoagulant solutions used.
The sterile blood bag systems used for the collection of blood and blood components and their
processing shall be CE-marked or be demonstrated to comply with equivalent standards.
Information about the non-CE marked bag system should include comprehensive data on the
following:
• identity and quality of plastic material involved,
• any leachables like plasticisers and adhesives, demonstrating that they do not pose any undue
risk,
• sterilization procedure and its validation. Proof of absence of residual toxic substances.
• composition, quality and Ph. Eur. compliance of the anticoagulant solution and
• results of a real time storage stability study of plasma in the container concerned.
For establishments listed in Annex II, compliance with the Ph. Eur. requirements for freezing and
storage should be included in Annex II, with an indication of whether requirements for recovery of
proteins that are labile or not labile in plasma are met. See also Section 2.2.1.
Describe the conditions for storage of plasma for every establishment responsible for storage of
plasma that is not listed in annex II, including the following:
• Confirm compliance with Ph. Eur. with respect to storage.
• Give a list of establishments/centres which are involved in this storage and indicate the date of
last inspection by a Competent Authority (annex IV)
• Describe conditions of storage (temperature and maximum time)
Provide details of any inventory hold and quarantine procedure for plasma and provide the
justification for the chosen period. Specify whether the procedure applies to all plasma or specify for
which plasma it is applicable.
i
Indicate nature and composition
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 11/16
2.2.6 Characterisation of the plasma pool.
Give a short description of all the relevant procedures in preparation of the plasma pool: thawing
process, visual inspection of individual bags or bottles before pooling, opening and pooling.
Indicate the size of the plasma pool, in number of donations and in litres.
Clarify whether or not the plasma pool is the same for all products (e.g. anti-D Ig).
Define the plasma pool (e.g. cryosupernatant or complete plasma pool) from which the samples for the
viral marker testing are obtained.
Describe the sampling procedure, any manipulation (rapid freezing, special precautions, …) of
samples and the storage conditions of the pool samples.
Testing of the plasma pools for all sites should be performed in accordance with the details provided
in this plasma master file.
2.3 System in place between the plasma-derived medicinal product manufacturer and/or
plasma fractionator/processor on the one hand, and blood establishments on the other
hand, which defines the conditions of their interaction and their agreed specifications.
Confirm that a contract exists between the blood establishments on one hand and the manufacturer
and/or the PMF holder on the other hand to ensure the interaction between them and the fulfilment of
the GMP/Good Practice requirements in accordance with GMP Directive 2003/94/EC (including
Annex 14 of the EU Guide to GMP) and Commission Directive 2005/62/EC. Such a contract should
also exist for intermediates and plasma-derived products supplied to third parties (e.g. albumin
supplied for use as an excipient).
Concerning systems for notification, confirm compliance with Directive 2002/98/EC, amending
Directive 2001/83/EC and Commission Directive 2005/61/EC.
In the event of a serious failure of a centre being discovered, the manufacturer will be immediately
informed.
It should be declared that all blood establishments have signed the contracts mentioned above.
DEFINITIONS
Audit (Council of Europe Recommendation No R (95) 15): systematic, independent and documented
process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which
audit criteria are fulfilled (ISO). This is a tool for checking that work is actually carried out according
to the policies, protocols and procedures required (GMP).
Audit programme (Council of Europe Recommendation No R (95) 15): a systematic and independent
examination to determine whether quality activities and related results comply with planned
arrangements and whether these arrangements are implemented effectively and are suitable to achieve
objectives.
Blood establishment (Directive 2002/98/EC): shall mean any structure or body that is responsible for
any aspect of the collection and testing of human blood or blood components, whatever their intended
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 12/16
purpose, and their processing, storage, and distribution when intended for transfusion. This does not
include hospital blood banks.
Centre: collection site or premise where blood or plasma is collected (and may also be processed and
stored). Centre is also applicable to testing site.
Inspection: (by EU/EEA competent authority) (Directive 2002/98/EC): shall mean formal and
objective control according to adopted standards to assess compliance with this Directive and other
relevant legislation and to identify problems. The interval between two inspections and control
measures shall not exceed two years.
Inventory hold: specified period of time (to be justified by the applicant), during which plasma units
are held in storage allowing for the retrieval of any suspect donations before they are considered for
use in plasma pools.
Look back: (EMEA/CPMP/BWP/269/95 Section 2.3.6) In the event that a plasma unit fails release due
to any of the reasons listed below, a look-back should consist of tracing back and further testing of
previous donations for at least six months prior to the last negative donation. The procedures to be
followed should be documented in a standard operating procedure.
• it is found that the donor did not meet the relevant donor health criteria;
• a subsequent donation from a donor previously found negative for viral markers is found
positive for any of the viral markers;
• it is discovered that testing for viral markers has not been carried out according to agreed
procedures;
• the donor has developed an infectious disease caused by an agent potentially transmissible by
plasma-derived products (HBV, HCV, HAV and other non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis viruses,
HIV 1 and 2 and other agents in the light of current knowledge);
• the donor develops Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD or vCJD);
• the recipient of blood or a blood component develops post-transfusion/infusion infection which
implicates or can be traced back to the donor.
Mobile site (Directive 2005/62/EC): means a temporary or movable place used for the collection of
blood and blood components which is in a location outside of but under control of the blood
establishment.
Plasma (Directive 2004/33/EC): the liquid portion of the blood in which the cells are suspended.
Plasma for fractionation (Ph. Eur. 0853): human plasma for fractionation is the liquid part of human
blood remaining after separation of the cellular elements from blood collected in a receptacle
containing anticoagulant, or separated by continuous filtration or centrifugation; it is intended for the
manufacture of plasma-derived products.
Plasma pool (Ph. Eur. 0853): first homogeneous pool of plasma (for example after removal of
cryoprecipitate) tested for viral markers.
Post collection measures (Council of Europe Recommendation No R (95) 15): systems must be in
place which allow the blood/plasma collection establishment and the manufacturing/fractionating
establishments to communicate relevant post donation information.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 13/16
Premises (Directive 2005/62/EC): including mobile sites shall be adapted and maintained to suit the
activities to be carried out. They shall enable the work to proceed in a logical sequence so as to
minimize the risk of errors, and shall allow for effective cleaning and maintenance in order to
minimize the risk of contamination.
Proficiency testing (Council of Europe Recommendation No R (95) 15): a specific tool for monitoring
the competency (performance) of laboratory personnel in carrying out their allocated tasks. This
generally takes the form of analysis of blinded samples distributed by external source.
Quarantine (Directive 2005/62/EC): means the physical isolation of blood components or incoming
materials/reagents over a variable period of time while awaiting acceptance, issuance or rejection of
the blood components or incoming material/reagents.
Traceability (Directive 2005/61/EC): means the ability to trace individual unit of blood or blood
components derived thereof from the donor to its final destination, whether this is a recipients, a
manufacturer of medicinal products or disposal, and vice versa.
Validation (directive 2004/33/EC and 2005/62/EC): means the establishment of documented and
objective evidence that the particular requirements for a specific intended use can be consistently
fulfilled.
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 14/16
REFERENCES
1
Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the community
code relating to medicinal products for human use.
http://pharmacos.eudra.org/F2/eudralex/vol-1/CONSOL_2004/Human%20Code.pdf
2
Contribution to Part II of the Structure of the Dossier for Applications for Marketing Authorisation - Control of
Starting Materials for the Production of Blood Derivatives” and takes into account the consultation on the draft
document released for consultation in July 2001 Ref. CPMP/BWP/2053/01 draft (III/5272/94 rev 1). Superseded
by this guideline.
3
Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 setting standards of
quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood
components.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_033/l_03320030208en00300040.pdf
4
Commission Directive 2004/33/EC of 22 March 2004 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for blood and blood components
(applicable since 8 February 2005).
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2004/l_091/l_09120040330en00250039.pdf
5
Commission Directive 2005/61/EC of 30 September 2005 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council as regards traceability requirements and notification of serious adverse reactions
and events.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2005/l_256/l_25620051001en00320040.pdf
6
Commission Directive 2005/62/EC of 30 September 2005 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council as regards Community standards and specifications relating to a quality system for
blood establishments.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2005/l_256/l_25620051001en00410048.pdf
7
Commission Directive 2003/63/EC of 25 June 2003 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use.
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2003_63/dir_2003_63_en.pdf
8
Guideline on Requirements for Plasma Master File (PMF) Certification
http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/bwp/466303en.pdf
9
Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14
June 1993 concerning medical devices.
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/c_014/c_01420060119en00040011.pdf
10
Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of
the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good
clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.
http://eudract.emea.eu.int/docs/Dir2001-20_en.pdf
11
EMEA/CPMP/BWP/125/04 Guideline on Epidemiological Data on Blood Transmissible Infections
http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/bwp/012504en.pdf
12
Commission Directive 2003/94/EC of 8 October 2003 laying down the principles and guidelines of good
manufacturing practice in respect of medicinal products for human use and investigational medicinal products
for human use.
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2003_94/dir_2003_94_en.pdf
13
CHMP Position statement on Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease and plasma-derived and urine-derived medicinal
products - EMEA/CPMP/BWP/2879/02
http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/press/pos/287902rev1.pdf
14
Manufacture of medicinal products derived from human blood or plasma: Annex 14 to the EU Guide to Good
Manufacturing Practice
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol-4/pdfs-en/gmpan14_en.pdf
15
Note for Guidance on Plasma-derived medicinal products - EMEA/CPMP/BWP/269/95 (Current version, Section 2.3)
http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/bwp/026995en.pdf
16
Council of Europe Recommendation No R (95) 15: “Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of
blood components” The Council of Europe definition of voluntary and non-remunerated donations is also
included in Council Recommendation of 29 June 1998 on the suitability of blood and plasma donors and the
screening of donated blood in the European Community (98/463/EC).
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/1998/l_203/l_20319980721en00140026.pdf
17
2002/364/EC - Commission Decision of 7 May 2002 on common technical specifications for in vitro-
diagnostic medical devices
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/l_131/l_13120020516en00170030.pdf
18
Guideline on Validation of Immunoassay for the Detection of Antibody to human Immunodeficiency Virus
(Anti-HIV) in Plasma Pools
http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/bwp/29838805en.pdf
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 15/16
19
Guideline on Validation of Immunoassay for the Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) in
Plasma Pools
http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/bwp/29839005en.pdf
20
ICH Topic Q2A Note for guidance on validation of analytical methods: definitions and terminology
http://www.emea.eu.int/pdfs/human/ich/038195en.pdf
21
Commission Regulation (EC) N. 1085/2003 of 3 June 2003 concerning the examination of variations to the
terms of a marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products
falling within the scope of Council Regulation (EEC) N. 2309/93
22
EMEA/INS/GMP/313513/2006 Compilation Of Community Procedures On Inspections And Exchange Of
Information
http://www.emea.europa.eu/Inspections/docs/CoCP/CoCP_InspConduct.pdf
EMEA/CHMP/BWP/3794/03 Rev. 1
©EMEA 2006 Page 16/16