ACYAFAR - (8) Revenue Recognition
ACYAFAR - (8) Revenue Recognition
ACYAFAR - (8) Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition
SYLLABUS
4.0 Revenue Recognition (PFRS 15)
4.1 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
4.1.1 Five-Steps Model Framework
4.1.2 Other Revenue Recognition Issues
4.1.2.1 Right of return
4.1.2.2 Principal-agent relationships
4.1.2.3 Non-refundable upfront fees
4.1.2.4 Licensing / Royalties
4.1.2.5 Repurchase arrangements
4.1.2.6 Gift Cards
4.1.2.7 Consignment arrangements
4.1.2.8 Bill-and-hold arrangements
4.1.2.9 Long – term Construction Contracts
4.1.2.9.1 Percentage of completion method
4.1.2.9.1.1 Input method
4.1.2.9.1.2 Output method
4.1.2.9.2 Contract Asset / Contract Liability
4.1.2.10 Franchise Operations – Franchisor’s point of view
4.1.2.10.1 Journal entries and determination of revenue, cost and gross profit
4.1.2.10.1.1 Initial franchise fee
4.1.2.10.1.2 Continuing franchise fee
4.1.2.11 Accounting for Consignment Sales
4.1.2.11.1 Amount Remitted
4.1.2.11.2 Ending Inventory Valuation
4.1.2.11.3 Determination of Net Income
4.1.3 Financial Statement Presentation
1
IFRS 15: Revenue1 from Contracts2 with Customers3
Core Principle: An entity shall recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers
in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services.
Income Increases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of inflows or
enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that result in an increase in equity, other
than those relating to contributions from equity participants.
Revenue1 Income arising in the course of an entity’s ordinary activities
Contract2 An agreement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations.
Contract asset An entity’s right to consideration in exchange for goods or services that the entity has
transferred to a customer when that right is conditioned on something other than the
passage of time (for example, the entity’s future performance).
Contract liability An entity’s obligation to transfer goods or services to a customer for which the entity has
received consideration (or the amount is due) from the customer.
Customer3 A party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or services that are an output of
the entity’s ordinary activities in exchange for consideration.
Performance A promise in a contract with a customer to transfer to the customer either:
obligation (a) a good or service (or a bundle of goods or services) that is distinct; or
(b) a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and that have the
same pattern of transfer to the customer.
Transaction price The amount of consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for
(for a contract with a transferring promised goods or services to a customer, excluding amounts collected on
customer) behalf of third
parties.
Stand-alone The price at which an entity would sell a promised good or service separately to a
selling customer.
price (of a good or
service)
2
Distinct goods or services (pa. 26)
Depending on the contract, promised goods or services may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) sale of goods produced by an entity (for example, inventory of a manufacturer);
(b) resale of goods purchased by an entity (for example, merchandise of a retailer);
(c) resale of rights to goods or services purchased by an entity (for example, a ticket resold by an entity acting as a
principal, as described in paragraphs B34–B38);
(d) performing a contractually agreed-upon task (or tasks) for a customer;
(e) providing a service of standing ready to provide goods or services (for example, unspecified updates to software
that are provided on a when and-if-available basis) or of making goods or services available for a customer to use
as and when the customer decides;
(f) providing a service of arranging for another party to transfer goods or services to a customer (for example, acting
as an agent of another party, as described in paragraphs B34–B38);
(g) granting rights to goods or services to be provided in the future that a customer can resell or provide to its
customer (for example, an entity selling a product to a retailer promises to transfer an additional good or service to
an individual who purchases the product from the retailer);
(h) constructing, manufacturing or developing an asset on behalf of a customer;
(i) granting licences (see paragraphs B52–B63B); and
(j) granting options to purchase additional goods or services (when those options provide a customer with a material
right, as described in paragraphs B39–B43).
A good or service that is promised to a customer is distinct if both of the following criteria are met:
(a) the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or together with other resources that are
readily available to the customer (ie the good or service is capable of being distinct); and
(b) the entity’s promise to transfer the good or service to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises
in the contract (ie the promise to transfer the good or service is distinct within the context of the contract).
(a) The entity has a present right to payment for the asset—if a customer is presently obliged to pay for an
asset, then that may indicate that the customer has obtained the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially
all of the remaining benefits from, the asset in exchange.
(b) The customer has legal title to the asset—legal title may indicate which party to a contract has the ability to
direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, an asset or to restrict the access of
other entities to those benefits. Therefore, the transfer of legal title of an asset may indicate that the customer has
obtained control of the asset. If an entity retains legal title solely as protection against the customer’s failure to pay,
those rights of the entity would not preclude the customer from obtaining control of an asset.
(c) The entity has transferred physical possession of the asset—the customer’s physical possession of an
asset may indicate that the customer has the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining
benefits from, the asset or to restrict the access of other entities to those benefits. However, physical possession
may not coincide with control of an asset. For example, in some repurchase agreements and in some consignment
arrangements, a customer or consignee may have physical possession of an asset that the entity controls.
Conversely, in some bill-and-hold arrangements, the entity may have physical possession of an asset that the
customer controls. Paragraphs B64–B76, B77–B78 and B79–B82 provide guidance on accounting for repurchase
agreements, consignment arrangements and bill-and-hold arrangements, respectively.
(d) The customer has the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the asset—the transfer of the
significant risks and rewards of ownership of an asset to the customer may indicate that the customer has obtained
3
the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset. However, when
evaluating the risks and rewards of ownership of a promised asset, an entity shall exclude any risks that give rise to
a separate performance obligation in addition to the performance obligation to transfer the asset. For example, an
entity may have transferred control of an asset to a customer but not yet satisfied an additional performance
obligation to provide maintenance services related to the transferred asset.
(e) The customer has accepted the asset—the customer’s acceptance of an asset may indicate that it has
obtained the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset. To
evaluate the effect of a contractual customer acceptance clause on when control of an asset is transferred, an entity
shall consider the guidance in paragraphs B83–B86.
An entity shall apply a single method of measuring progress for each performance obligation satisfied over time and
the entity shall apply that method consistently to similar performance obligations and in similar circumstances. At the
end of each reporting period, an entity shall remeasure its progress towards complete satisfaction of a performance
obligation satisfied over time.
When applying a method for measuring progress, an entity shall exclude from the measure of progress any goods
or services for which the entity does not transfer control to a customer. Conversely, an entity shall include in the
measure of progress any goods or services for which the entity does transfer control to a customer when satisfying
that performance obligation.
As circumstances change over time, an entity shall update its measure of progress to reflect any changes in the
outcome of the performance obligation. Such changes to an entity’s measure of progress shall be accounted for as
a change in accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates
and Errors.
In some circumstances (for example, in the early stages of a contract), an entity may not be able to reasonably
measure the outcome of a performance obligation, but the entity expects to recover the costs incurred in satisfying
the performance obligation. In those circumstances, the entity shall recognize revenue only to the extent of the costs
incurred until such time that it can reasonably measure the outcome of the performance obligation.
The nature, timing and amount of consideration promised by a customer affect the estimate of the transaction price.
When determining the transaction price, an entity shall consider the effects of all of the following:
(a) variable consideration (see paragraphs 50–55 and 59);
(b) constraining estimates of variable consideration (see paragraphs 56–58);
(c) the existence of a significant financing component in the contract (see paragraphs 60–65);
(d) non-cash consideration (see paragraphs 66–69); and
(e) consideration payable to a customer (see paragraphs 70–72).
4
Allocating the transaction price to performance obligations
The objective when allocating the transaction price is for an entity to allocate the transaction price to each
performance obligation (or distinct good or service) in an amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which
the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the promised goods or services to the customer.
To meet the allocation objective, an entity shall allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation
identified in the contract on a relative standalone selling price basis in accordance with paragraphs 76–80, except as
specified in paragraphs 81–83 (for allocating discounts) and paragraphs 84–86 (for allocating consideration that
includes variable amounts).
Paragraphs 76–86 do not apply if a contract has only one performance obligation. However, paragraphs 84–86 may
apply if an entity promises to transfer a series of distinct goods or services identified as a single performance
obligation in accordance with paragraph 22(b) and the promised consideration includes variable amounts.
The stand-alone selling price is the price at which an entity would sell a promised good or service separately to a
customer. The best evidence of a stand-alone selling price is the observable price of a good or service when the
entity sells that good or service separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. A contractually stated
price or a list price for a good or service may be (but shall not be presumed to be) the stand-alone selling price
of that good or service.
If a stand-alone selling price is not directly observable, an entity shall estimate the stand-alone selling price at an
amount that would result in the allocation of the transaction price meeting the allocation objective in paragraph 73.
When estimating a stand-alone selling price, an entity shall consider all information (including market conditions,
entity-specific factors and information about the customer or class of customer) that is reasonably available to the
entity. In doing so, an entity shall maximise the use of observable inputs and apply estimation methods consistently
in similar circumstances.
Suitable methods for estimating the stand-alone selling price of a good or service include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(a) Adjusted market assessment approach—an entity could evaluate the market in which it sells goods or
services and estimate the price that a customer in that market would be willing to pay for those goods or services.
That approach might also include referring to prices from the entity’s competitors for similar goods or services and
adjusting those prices as necessary to reflect the entity’s costs and margins.
(b) Expected cost plus a margin approach—an entity could forecast its expected costs of satisfying a
performance obligation and then add an appropriate margin for that good or service.
(c) Residual approach—an entity may estimate the stand-alone selling price by reference to the total transaction
price less the sum of the observable stand-alone selling prices of other goods or services promised in the contract.
However, an entity may use a residual approach to estimate, in accordance with paragraph 78, the standalone
selling price of a good or service only if one of the following criteria is met:
(i) the entity sells the same good or service to different customers (at or near the same time) for a broad range of
amounts (ie the selling price is highly variable because a representative standalone selling price is not discernible
from past transactions or other observable evidence); or
(ii) the entity has not yet established a price for that good or service and the good or service has not previously been
sold on a stand-alone basis (ie the selling price is uncertain).