Indian Logic - Notes
Indian Logic - Notes
Indian Logic - Notes
Copyright © 2014-2023 TestBook Edu Solutions Pvt. Ltd.: All rights reserved
Download Testbook App
Prama is valid knowledge. Knowledge can be valid or invalid; valid knowledge is called
prama and non-valid knowledge is known as aprama.
Pramana is valid means of knowledge and its important four means include
perception (pratyaksa),
inference (anumana),
The Orthodox Logic contains the Vedas and can be divided into four classes,
a. Nyaya
b. Samkhya
c. Vaisheshika
d. Mimansa/ Poorva Mimansa and so on.
The Unorthodox Logic contains the Non-Vedas which are divided into,
a. Buddhist
b. Jainism
c. Charvaka or Materialists.
All methods are accepted by Mimamsa; only perception, inference and testimony by Yoga; only
perception and inference by Buddhism and Vaisesika; and only perception by Carvaka.
Orthodox
Schools of Indian Philosophy
Orthodox (astika) schools, originally called sanatana dharma, are collectively referred to as
Hinduism in modern times. The ancient Vedas are their source and scriptural authority.
Samkhya (Kapila): Samkhya is the oldest of the orthodox philosophical systems, and it
postulates that everything in reality stems from purusha (self, soul or mind) and prakriti
(matter, creative agency, energy).
Purush cannot be modified or changed while prakriti brings change in all objects.
Yoga (Patanjali): Yoga literally means the union of two principal entities. Yogic techniques
control body, mind & sense organs, thus considered as a means of achieving freedom or
mukti.
Nyaya (Gautama Muni): Nyaya Philosophy states that nothing is acceptable unless it is in
accordance with reason and experience (scientific approach). Nyaya is considered as a
technique of logical thinking.
Nyaya Sutras say that there are four means of attaining valid knowledge:
perception, inference, comparison, and verbal testimony.
Vaisheshika (Kanada): The basis of the school's philosophy is that all objects in the
physical universe are reducible to a finite number of atoms and Brahman is regarded as
the fundamental force that causes consciousness in these atoms.
The reality according to this philosophy has many bases or categories which are
substance, attribute, action, genus, distinct quality and inherence.
Vaisheshika thinkers believe that all objects of the universe are composed of five
elements–earth, water, air, fire and ether.
They believe that God is the guiding principle. The living beings were rewarded or
punished according to the law of karma, based on actions of merit and demerit.
The Vaisheshika and Nyaya schools eventually merged because of their closely
related metaphysical theories (Vaisheshika only accepted perception and inference
as sources of valid knowledge).
According to Mimamsa philosophy Vedas are eternal and possess all knowledge,
and religion means the fulfilment of duties prescribed by the Vedas.
It says that the essence of the Vedas is dharma. By the execution of dharma one
earns merit which leads one to heaven after death.
Advaita (Adi Shankara): It states that both the individual self (Atman) and Brahman
are the same, and knowing this difference causes liberation.
Dvaitadvaita (Nimbarka): It states that the Brahman is the highest reality, the
controller of all.
Shuddhadvaita (Vallabhacharya): It states that both God and the individual self are
the same, and not different.
Schools that do not accept the authority of Vedas are by definition unorthodox (nastika)
systems. The following schools belong to heterodox schools of Indian Philosophy.
According to Charvaka there is no other world. Hence, death is the end of humans
& pleasure is the ultimate object in life.
Jain philosophy (Mahavira): A basic principle is anekantavada, the idea that reality is
perceived differently from different points of view, and that no single point of view is
completely true.
According to Jainism, only the Kevalins, those who have infinite knowledge, can
know the true answer, and that all others would only know a part of the answer.
Indian logic does not separate Reduction from induction. Inference is a complex process
involving both. Indian logic also rejects the verbalist view of logic. It studies thought as such
and not the forms of thought alone. The formal and the material logic are blended here.
Verbal form forms no integral part of the inference.
A. Two
B. Three
C. Four
D. Five
Answer : B.
Three Solution : Indian Philosophy can be divided into three periods- Vedic Period, Upanishadic
Period, Post-Vedic Period