Position Paper. Dela Gente
Position Paper. Dela Gente
Position Paper. Dela Gente
BSED-SOCIAL STUDIES/1A
In the present time, humans are using artificial intelligence (AI) for a wider range
of reasons. We now have “Siri”, which can easily take commands and perform tasks just
by a voice command, disease-diagnosing systems, and robots that can nearly replace
doctors. People and particular business industries prefer to use artificial intelligence (AI)
since it outperforms human intellect in terms of performance, is error-free, doesn't need
food or sleep, and has infinite work hours. Due to such innovations, the question of
whether robots or automated programs will someday replace human workers emerges
as more and more areas of life become computerized. The integration of AI
technologies also brings forth a range of negative impacts that can significantly affect
employees, organizations, and the broader societal landscape. Some experts like Brady
(2018) stated that, “AI can replace people in jobs”.
With the unprecedented spread and limitless capacity of Artificial intelligence (AI)
and related technologies, it also has the potential to create new opportunities and
breakthroughs that none has never been thought about or imagined yet in fields such
as data analysis, machine learning, and software development, which will be beneficial
for humans (Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018).
Nevertheless, AI systems are not immune to bias, as they are trained on historical
data that may reflect societal prejudices and inequalities. Thus, this might pave a way
for the occurrence of some conflict in terms of ethical considerations surrounding the
deployment of AI in the workplace are another significant negative impact. AI systems
are not immune to bias, as they are trained on historical data that may reflect societal
prejudices and inequalities. This can result in discriminatory outcomes in areas such as
recruitment, performance evaluation, and decision-making processes. For example, a
study by Buolamwini and Gebru (2018) found that facial recognition systems exhibited
higher error rates for darker-skinned individuals, highlighting the potential for bias in AI
algorithms. Such biases can perpetuate existing inequalities and undermine efforts
towards diversity and inclusion in the workplace.
References:
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). “The race between man and machine:
Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment”. American
Economic Review, 108(6), 1488-1542.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014).” The second machine age: Work, progress, and
prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies”.W. W. Norton & Company.
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018).” Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities
in commercial gender classification”. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness,
Accountability and Transparency.
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). “The future of employment: How susceptible are
jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, 114, 254-280.
Manyika, J., et al., (2017). “A future that works: Automation, employment, and
productivity”. McKinsey Global Institute.