1

CPC is an Adjective Law

The statement "CPC is an adjective law" refers to the nature and

function of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) in the legal system.
To understand and discuss this, it is essential to delve into the
distinction between substantive law and adjective (or procedural)
law, the purpose of the CPC, and its role in the administration of
justice.

Substantive Law vs. Adjective Law

 Substantive Law: Substantive law defines the rights and

duties of individuals and collective bodies. It is the body of
law that creates, defines, and regulates rights, such as
property laws, contract laws, and criminal laws. Substantive
law is concerned with the substance of the matter – what
the law is.
 Adjective (Procedural) Law: Adjective law, also known as
procedural law, provides the mechanisms and procedures
for enforcing the rights and duties defined by substantive
law. It is concerned with the process – how the law is
applied. Procedural law includes rules of evidence,
jurisdiction, pleading, practice, and procedure.

The Nature of the CPC

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, is fundamentally an adjective

law. Its primary function is to provide a structured process for
enforcing the rights and obligations established by substantive
civil laws. The CPC lays down the rules for the functioning of civil
courts and the procedures to be followed in civil litigation. Here’s
a closer examination of its purpose and scope:

1. Procedural Framework: The CPC provides a comprehensive

procedural framework for the conduct of civil litigation. It
outlines the steps to be followed from the initiation of a
lawsuit to its resolution, including filing of suits, issuance of
summons, appearance of parties, trial procedures, and
execution of judgments.
2. Ensuring Fairness and Order: The procedural rules in the
CPC are designed to ensure fairness and order in the
 2

judicial process. They aim to provide a fair opportunity for

both parties to present their case, ensure timely and
efficient resolution of disputes, and prevent abuse of the
judicial process.
3. Jurisdiction and Powers of Courts: The CPC defines the
jurisdiction and powers of civil courts. It establishes the
hierarchy of courts, their jurisdictional limits, and their
powers in various stages of litigation. This helps in the
systematic administration of justice and prevents
jurisdictional conflicts.
4. Modes of Execution: The CPC details the procedures for
the execution of decrees and orders. Execution is the
process of enforcing or giving effect to the judgment of the
court. The provisions in the CPC ensure that the rights
granted by the court are effectively realized by the
successful party.
5. Interim Measures and Reliefs: The CPC includes
provisions for interim measures and reliefs, such as
temporary injunctions, attachment before judgment, and
appointment of receivers. These measures are essential for
protecting the interests of parties during the pendency of
litigation.
6. Amendments and Adaptability: The CPC has been
amended several times to address emerging needs and
challenges in the judicial process. These amendments
reflect the adaptability of procedural law to changing
circumstances and the evolving needs of society.

The Role of CPC in the Legal System

The CPC plays a crucial role in the administration of justice by

providing a standardized and predictable process for resolving
civil disputes. It helps in:

 Ensuring Legal Certainty: The detailed procedural rules in

the CPC provide legal certainty and predictability. Parties to
a dispute know the procedures to be followed and can plan
their legal strategies accordingly.
 Facilitating Access to Justice: By providing a clear and
structured procedural framework, the CPC facilitates access
to justice. It ensures that parties can effectively present
their case and seek redressal for their grievances.
 3

 Promoting Judicial Efficiency: The procedural rules in the

CPC are designed to promote judicial efficiency. They aim to
streamline the litigation process, reduce delays, and ensure
timely resolution of disputes.
 Upholding the Rule of Law: The CPC upholds the rule of
law by ensuring that civil disputes are resolved according to
established legal principles and procedures. It prevents
arbitrary decision-making and ensures that justice is
administered impartially.

The Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) is an adjective law that

provides the procedural framework for the enforcement of rights
and obligations defined by substantive law. Its primary purpose
is to ensure fairness, order, and efficiency in the administration
of civil justice. By laying down detailed rules and procedures for
the conduct of civil litigation, the CPC plays a vital role in
upholding the rule of law and facilitating access to justice.

Difference between adversarial and inquisitorial

system.

Adversarial & Inquisitorial system.

An adversarial system is that where the court act as a referee

between the prosecution and the defence. The whole process is a
contest between two parties. As regard crime these two parties
are the state & the person accused .In this process court takes a
non partisan role.

An inquisitorial system is a legal system where the court is

actively involved in proof of facts by taking investigating of the
case. This system resolving disputes and achieving justice for
individuals and society.

Distinction between adversarial and inquisitorial system.

 4

The following table outline contains the fundamental differences

between typical adversarial and inquisitorial systems-
Adversarial Inquisitorial
System System

The adversarial system aims The inquisitorial system is

to get the truth through the generally aims to get the truth
open competition between the of the matter through extensive
prosecution and the defence. investigation and examination
of all evidence.

In an adversarial system all In an inquisitorial system the

parties determine what conduct of the trial is in the
witnesses they call and the hands of the court. The trial
nature of the evidence they judge determines what
give. The court overseeing the witnesses to call & order in
process by which evidence is which they are to be heard.
given.

In adversarial systems There is little use of judicial

previous decisions by higher precedent in
courts are binding on lower inquisitorial systems. This
courts. means Judges are free to
decide each case independently
of previous decisions by
applying the relevant statutes.

In an adversarial system the In an inquisitorial system the

rule of lawyers is active. rule of lawyers is passive.

The judges pronounce The judge plays an active rule

judgment depending on the for questioing & hearing the
hearing, evidence or on the parties directly.
basis of examination & cross-
examination.

In an adversarial system the In an inquisitorial system the

rule of the judges are merely rule of the judges is very active.
 5

passive in nature.

The case management does The case management depends

not depends upon the judges upon the judges so the judges
so the judges contribution is contribution is very high for
very low for the disposal of any the disposal of any case.
case.

In an adversarial system all In an inquisitorial system

references are presented by references also presented by
the respective lawyers of both the judge & they play’s an
the parties. active rule.

The case management The case management depends

depends upon the lawyer’s of upon the judges and the
both the parties & they get judges fixes the term for the
unfattered opportunity for the disposal of any case.
case management upon there
own wishes.

In an adversarial system the In an inquisitorial system

hearing, evidence or documents and information
examination & cross- about the real facts get
examination done by the priority.
lawyer get priority.

Case management is not Case management is effective

effective under this system under this system & the judges
because the judges can not sits with the parties and can
exchange views with the exchange views for taking any
parties for taking any decision. decision for speedy disposal of
So no initiative can be taken any case.
for speedy disposal of any
case.

In an adversarial system In an inquisitorial system

judges has discretionary judges have wide discretionary
power but that is not wide by power.
the evidence.

Repeated time petition The main object of this system

 6

(common practice) is permitted is to reduce the time for

at the time of continuance of disposing a case and to ensure
the case & the lawyer’s take speedy justice. Judge plays an
the opportunity of making active role in deciding time
time petition. So delay occurs petition & may honored or
in disposal of any cases. reject time petition.

Appeal is a creation of statute – Discuss

The Legislative Foundation of Appeals

In legal systems worldwide, the right to appeal is not an inherent

feature of common law but rather a construct of legislative
statutes. This fundamental principle underscores the role of
legislative bodies in establishing the procedural framework
through which parties can seek review of lower court decisions in
higher courts.

Understanding Appeals as Statutory Constructs

1. Statutory Enactments: Appeals are meticulously defined

and regulated by statutes enacted by legislatures. These
laws outline the grounds for appeal, the procedures to be
followed, and the powers vested in appellate courts. By
codifying these provisions, statutes provide a structured
mechanism for parties dissatisfied with judicial decisions to
seek reconsideration.
2. Prescribed Procedures: Statutes prescribe the specific
steps and timelines involved in filing and pursuing appeals.
They establish the jurisdictional boundaries of appellate
courts, delineate the standards of review, and set forth the
legal principles under which appeals are adjudicated. This
statutory framework ensures consistency and predictability
in the appellate process.
3. Purpose of Legislative Intervention: The legislative
creation of appeals serves several crucial purposes within
the legal system:
 7

o Ensuring Judicial Oversight: By allowing higher

courts to review lower court decisions, statutes
promote judicial oversight and accountability. This
mechanism helps prevent errors, ensure adherence to
legal standards, and uphold the integrity of judicial
rulings.
o Protecting Rights and Remedies: Appeals provide a
safeguard against miscarriages of justice by offering
parties the opportunity to challenge erroneous or
unjust lower court decisions. This protects individual
rights and promotes fair and equitable outcomes.
o Promoting Legal Certainty: The statutory framework
surrounding appeals fosters legal certainty by
clarifying the procedural rules and criteria for
appellate review. Parties involved in litigation can rely
on these established guidelines to navigate the
appellate process effectively.

Significance in Legal Practice

The statutory creation of appeals holds significant implications

for legal practice and the administration of justice:

 Facilitating Access to Justice: Appeals ensure that

individuals have access to a fair and impartial review of
their cases, thereby enhancing access to justice and
preserving due process rights.
 Contributing to Legal Development: Appellate decisions
contribute to the development of legal principles and
precedents. They clarify ambiguous areas of law, establish
authoritative interpretations, and shape the evolution of
jurisprudence.
 Maintaining Judicial Integrity: By providing a mechanism
for reviewing and correcting lower court decisions, appeals
contribute to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the
judicial system.

The assertion that "Appeal is a creation of statute" underscores

the foundational role of legislative enactments in shaping the
procedural landscape of appeals within legal systems. By defining
the rights of parties to seek review, establishing the parameters
for appellate review, and promoting judicial oversight, statutes
 8

ensure that the appellate process operates effectively as a

mechanism for upholding justice, protecting rights, and
maintaining the rule of law.