Parham 2010
Parham 2010
Parham 2010
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A carbon paste electrode is modified with ZrO2 -nanoparticles and its application for square wave voltam-
Received 12 November 2009 metric (SWV) detection of methyl parathion, MP (organophosphate pesticide) is reported. The nano-ZrO2
Received in revised form 5 January 2010 shows a strong affinity toward the phosphate group on methyl parathion molecules, which provides
Accepted 5 January 2010
sensitivity and selectivity of the modified carbon paste electrode. Instrumental and chemical parameters
Available online 11 January 2010
influencing the voltammetric response are optimized for MP determination. Under optimum experimen-
tal conditions the peak current is linear to MP concentration over the range of 5.0–3000.0 ng mL−1 with
Keywords:
a correlation coefficient of 0.9992. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for MP
Methyl parathion
ZrO2 -nanoparticles
based on three and ten times the standard deviation of the blank (3Sb , 10Sb ) were 2.0 and 5.7 ng mL−1
Modified carbon paste electrode (n = 20) for MP, respectively. The recovery values from quality control (QC) samples of water solutions con-
Square wave voltammetry taining low, middle and high concentrations of MP (50, 100 and 800 ng mL−1 ) were 98.0 ± 2.3%, 92.5 ± 4.9%
and 97.6 ± 2.8%, respectively. The electrode is successfully applied for the determination of MP in different
water samples.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0304-3894/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.031
1078 H. Parham, N. Rahbar / Journal of Hazardous Materials 177 (2010) 1077–1084
(I)
(II)
(III)
In order to test the reproducibility and repeatability of the pro- The sensitive square wave voltammetric (SWV) method is cho-
posed method, the intra-day precision and accuracy were evaluated sen to determine trace quantities of MP in different water samples.
by determining a replicate analysis of QC samples of MP on the same Fig. 3 shows a sharp, symmetric and well-defined SW voltam-
day. The run consisted of a calibration curve and four replicates of mogram peak of MP (3 g mL−1 ) which is obtained between the
each low, middle, and high concentration quality control samples. potential range from +0.30 to −0.30 V in acetate buffer (pH 5.25).
For determining the inter-day accuracy and precision, analyses of The maximum SW peak current of the MP occurs at −0.028 V.
three batches of QC samples were performed on different days. The In order to obtain a well-defined peak with maximum peak
selectivity was evaluated by comparing the peak current intensity current for the determination of trace amounts of MP, different
changes for accumulated MP at the electrode surface in different chemical and instrumental parameters such as electrode com-
batches containing different interfering species. position weight ratios, pH, buffer volume, accumulation time,
1080 H. Parham, N. Rahbar / Journal of Hazardous Materials 177 (2010) 1077–1084
Fig. 4. The effect of the amount of ZrO2 -nanoparticles per 100 g of carbon paste
(C:Paraffin, 70:30, w/w) on the peak current intensity (−0.028 V) of MP voltammo- Fig. 5. The effect of pH of sample solution on the peak current intensity (−0.028 V)
gram. [Conditions: concentration of MP: 0.5 g mL−1 ; pH 5.0; other variables are of MP voltammogram. [Conditions: same as those in Fig. 4, except that the pH of
same as those in Fig. 3.]. sample solution is variable.].
H. Parham, N. Rahbar / Journal of Hazardous Materials 177 (2010) 1077–1084 1081
Fig. 6. The effect of accumulation time on the peak current intensity (−0.028 V) of
MP voltammogram. [Conditions: pH 5.25; other variables are same as those in Fig. 4, Fig. 7. The effect of conditioning potential on the peak current intensity (−0.028 V)
except that accumulation time is variable.]. of MP voltammogram. [Conditions: accumulation time: 3 min; other variables are
same as those in Fig. 4, except that conditioning potential is variable.].
3.5. The effect of equilibration time (ET) and scan increment (SI)
on MP voltammograms nature of MP under this condition. Thus, an accumulation is per-
formed under open-circuit.
Equilibration time (ET), which controls a variable delay dur-
ing the cell performance, was studied. Equilibration times of 0,
5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 s were applied to the electrodes and 3.9. Influence of conditioning potential and conditioning time
the corresponding voltammograms were recorded. The results
showed no measurable increase in peak current at ET values greater In order to prepare the conditions for electrochemical reac-
than 0 s. Thus, a time period of 0 s was selected as optimum ET tion of the analyte (MP) at the electrode surface, a conditioning
value. potential must be applied to the working electrode. This poten-
The effect of scan increment, which determines the amount of tial must be applied to the electrode before potential scanning
potential changes between two data points in the experiment, was and recording the voltammograms for analytical purposes. As it
investigated. Scan increment values in the range of 1–10 mV (with is seen in Section 3.1, the reactant of reaction (II) is the product
1 mV intervals) were applied to the electrodes and the correspond- of reaction (I). The reversible redox pair (reactions (II) and (III))
ing voltammograms were recorded. The resulting peak currents will produce the SW voltammogram and this is due to occurrence
showed that, by increasing the scan increment up to 2 mV values, of reaction (I) at working electrode before any SW potential scan-
the voltammograms’ peak current will also increase steadily; so ning. Reaction (I) occurs by applying a conditioning potential after
2 mV was chosen as the optimum scan increment. accumulation of MP on the modified carbon paste electrode (MCPE)
surface under open-circuit. Different conditioning potentials were
applied in the range between 0.0 and −1.0 V. The results in Fig. 7
3.6. The effect of frequency on MP square wave voltammograms
show that at applied potentials smaller than −0.6 V, no considerable
peak current intensity was observed at −0.028 V (the peak poten-
The effect of frequency changes on the voltammograms peak
tial of methyl parathion (MP) SW voltammogram). The peak current
current (−0.028 V) of MP was studied between the range of
intensity of MP increases with increasing the applied potential to
20–200 Hz and the results showed that frequencies in the range of
−0.8 V and remains almost constant after this potential. The applied
40–80 Hz give the highest peak currents and so, 60 Hz was chosen
potential of −0.8 V was used throughout as the optimum condition-
as optimum frequency value.
ing potential for detection of MP. This potential matches with the
irreversible reduction peak (EPc , −0.80 V) that is observed in Fig. 2b.
3.7. The effect of pulse height
In order to obtain the optimum conditioning time, the conditioning
potential (−0.8 V) was applied in different time periods between 1
The effect of pulse height variation on the peak current of
and 14 s. The peak current intensity of MP increases with increas-
MP voltammograms was studied in the range of 15–125 mV. The
ing the conditioning time up to 10 s and remains almost constant
obtained results showed that increasing the pulse heights up to
after this time. Based on the obtained results, 10 s was chosen as
25 mV will cause an increase in peak current. Pulse heights more
optimum conditioning time.
than 25 mV cause broadening of the MP voltammogram and so
decreasing the peak current intensity of the analyte. So the opti-
mum pulse height value was selected to be 25 mV. 3.10. Effect of interfering ions
3.8. Influence of accumulation time and accumulation potential Prior to the application of proposed method on real samples it
was vital to investigate the effect of some of the interfering ions on
The SW peak current of MP increases with accumulation time the recovery percentage of MP. The SW voltammetric determina-
increasing from 0 to 180 s, as shown in Fig. 6. But when it exceeds tion of MP was tested in the presence of spiked known amounts of
180 s (3 min) the peak current remains almost constant for a interfering ions and molecules. The tolerance limit was defined as
0.5 g mL−1 MP solution, meaning that an accumulation/or extrac- the amount of the foreign substance causing a change of ±5% in the
tion equilibrium is achieved at the electrode/solution interface. peak current intensity reading. The tolerable limits of interfering
The influence of accumulation potential is examined from +0.3 to substance are given in Table 1. The results showed that most of the
−0.5 V. The results showed that the peak current of MP is almost investigated substances do not interfere in the SW voltammetric
independent of accumulation potential. This is due to the neutral determination of MP in water samples.
1082 H. Parham, N. Rahbar / Journal of Hazardous Materials 177 (2010) 1077–1084
Table 1 Table 2
The tolerance limit of interfering substances on SW voltammetric determination Precision and accuracy data for SW voltammetric detection of MP in water sample
of MP (0.50 g mL−1 ) using MCPE. [Conditions: pH 5.25; 2 mL of acetate buffer; using MCPE (intra-day: n = 6; inter-day: n = 6 runs per day, 5 days).
accumulation time: 3 min; conditioning potential: −0.80 V; conditioning time: 10 s;
pulse height: 25 mV; scan increment: 2 mV; frequency: 60 Hz.]. MP concentration (g mL−1 ) RSD (%) Relative error (%)
K+ , Na+ , NH4 + , NO3 − 1500 0.050 0.049 ± 0.007 4.5 8.9 −2.0
SO4 2− , Cl− 1000 0.200 0.215 ± 0.014 3.7 6. 6 +7.5
Ca2+ , Mg2+ 100 0.800 0.781 ± 0.042 3.2 7.8 −2.4
Ni2+ , Co2+ , Fe2+ , Fe3+ 50
Hg2+ , Cr3+ , Pb2+ , Cd2+ 10
Cu2+ 5 Table 3
Nitrophenol, phenol 20 Determination of MP content and recovery test of MP in tap (100 mL) and river
(100 mL) water samples with the proposed method (n = 6). [Conditions: pH 5.25;
2 mL of acetate buffer; accumulation time: 3 min; conditioning potential: −0.80 V;
conditioning time: 10 s; pulse height: 25 mV; scan increment: 2 mV; frequency:
3.11. Analytical performance and method validation 60 Hz.].
Sample Added MP (g mL−1 ) Found MPa (g mL−1 ) Recovery (%)
In order to show the validation of the proposed method, the b d
Tap water – ND –
analytical features of the method such as linear range of the cal-
Tap water 0.050 0.051 ± 0.003 102.0
ibration curve, LOD, LOQ, accuracy and precision were examined. Tap water 0.100 0.097 ± 0.012 97.0
Fig. 8 shows the voltammograms of MP in the concentration range Tap water 0.800 0.789 ± 0.020 98.8
of 5.0–3000.0 ng mL−1 . Under the optimum conditions, the cal- River waterc – 0.051 –
River water 0.050 0.097 ± 0.005 94.0
ibration graph for the determination of MP is obtained with a
River water 0.100 0.146 ± 0.015 96.0
correlation coefficient of 0.9992. The regression equation for the River water 0.800 0.866 ± 0.021 102.0
line was i = 1.3641CMP + 0.6031 (n = 9), where CMP is the concen- a
x ± s (n = 6).
tration of MP in g mL−1 and (i) is the peak current intensity b
Tap water components: Ca2+ = 52; Mg2+ = 29; Na+ = 37; CO3 2− = 61; Cl− = 24;
difference (at the peak potential −0.028 V) between the analyte SO4 2− = 25; NO3 − = 9 g mL−1 ; pH 7.3; EC = 853.
and the blank voltammograms (Fig. 8). The slope of the line c
River water main components: Ca2+ = 82; Mg2+ = 49; Na+ = 68; CO3 2− = 91;
b = 1.3641 ± 0.0437 which shows a R.S.D. = 3.0% and the intercept of Cl− = 44; SO4 2− = 35; NO3 − = 9 g mL−1 ; pH 7.1; TDS = 387; EC = 1340.
d
Not detected.
the line a = 0.6031 ± 0.004 with a R.S.D. = 4.6% were also obtained.
Under optimum experimental conditions, the LOD and LOQ, of the
proposed method based on three and ten times the standard devi- The recovery values from QC samples of water solutions con-
ation of the blank (3Sb , 10Sb ) [40] were 2.0 and 5.7 ng mL−1 for MP taining low, middle and high concentrations of MP (50, 100 and
(n = 9), respectively. 800 ng mL−1 ) were 98.0 ± 2.3%, 92.5 ± 4.9% and 97.6 ± 2.8%, respec-
Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy data (showing tively.
reproducibility and repeatability terms) for SW voltammetric
detection of MP in QC samples are summarized in Table 2. The preci- 3.12. Application on real sample
sion and accuracy of the present method conform to the criteria for
the analysis of water samples according to the guidance of US-FDA In order to test the validity of the method, the proposed pro-
where the RSD determined at each concentration level is required cedure was applied for determination of MP in water samples.
not to exceed 15% (20% for LOQ) and R.E. within ±15% (±20% for Recovery tests were used to examine the reliability and accuracy
LOQ) of the actual value [40]. of the method, different amounts of MP were spiked into the tap
(100 mL) and river (100 mL) water samples and MP content of each
sample was determined at optimum conditions. The MP content
of different samples and recoveries of added analyte were evalu-
ated and the results showed that it is possible to determine the MP
concentration in real sample solutions using the proposed method
outlined in this investigation (Table 3).
4. Conclusion
Table 4
The comparison of the proposed method (SW voltammetric determination of MP by ZrO2 -MCPE) with other reported methods of MP or other pesticides determination.
Detection methoda Detection limit (ng mL−1 ) Analysis time (min) Linear dynamic range (ng mL−1 ) Accuracy (%) Ref.
b b
GC (MP) 1.5 40 NR NR [8]
GC (MP) 0.08 >25 NR ±8 [9]
GC-MS (PS) 0.20 30 NR ±5 [10]
HPLC-FL (PS) 4–12 30 16–700 ±5 [12]
BIOS (PS) 0.0002 >30 NR ±7 [14]
BIOS (PS) 20 >60 NR ±10 [18]
BIOS (PS) 10 >30 1–20 ±20 [20]
V (MP) 100 >15 20–120 (g mL−1 ) NR [23]
V (MP) 4.8 >15 10–120 ±6 [26]
V (MP) 20 >40 20–700 ±10 [28]
V (MP) 100 >25 NR NR [29]
V (MP) 3 >15 20–140 ±5 [31]
V (MP) 1.2 >15 3–100 ±3 [32]
V (MP) 1.0 >25 3–2000 ±5 [33]
V (MP) 2.0 10 5–3000 ±5 Proposed
a
Gas chromatography (GC), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), high-
performance liquid chromatography–mass Fluorimetry (HPLC-FL), biosensor (BIOS), and voltammetric (V).
b
NR, not reported.
the developed method, but these methods suffer from extensive tion I. Modification of carbon surface for immobilization of acetyl-
and expensive pre-treatment steps and lengthy time of analysis. cholinesterase, Biosens. Bioelectron. 20 (2004) 1118–1125.
[14] S. Sotiropoulou, N.A. Chaniotakis, Lowering the detection limit of the acetyl-
The developed method shows good and comparable recovery per- cholinesterase biosensor using a nanoporous carbon matrix, Anal. Chim. Acta
cent values (98.8–102.0) with respect to other reported methods. 530 (2005) 199–204.
[15] S. Sotiropoulou, D. Fournier, N.A. Chaniotakis, Genetically engineered
acetylcholinesterase-based biosensor for attomolar detection of dichlorvos,
Acknowledgement Biosens. Bioelectron. 20 (2005) 2347–2352.
[16] J. Gong, L. Wang, L. Zhang, Electrochemical biosensing of methyl parathion
pesticide based on acetylcholinesterase immobilized onto Au–polypyrrole
The authors wish to thank Shahid Chamran University Research interlaced network-like nanocomposite, Biosens. Bioelectron. 24 (2009)
Council for financial support of this work (grant 1386). 2285–2288.
[17] F. Mazzei, F. Botreı̌, S. Montilla, R. Pilloton, E. Podesta‘, C. Botre‘, Alkaline
phosphatase inhibition based electrochemical sensors for the detection of pes-
References ticides, J. Electroanal. Chem. 574 (2004) 95–100.
[18] C. Karnati, H. Du, H.-F. Ji, X. Xu, Y. Lvov, A. Mulchandani, P. Mulchandani, W.
[1] F. Hernández, R. Serrano, E. Pitarch, F.J. L’opez, Automated sample clean-up Chen, Organophosphorus hydrolase multilayer modified microcantilevers for
procedure for organophosphorus pesticides in several aquatic organisms using organophosphorus detection, Biosens. Bioelectron. 22 (2007) 2636–2642.
normal phase liquid chromatography, Anal. Chim. Acta 374 (1998) 215–229. [19] D. Du, S. Chena, J. Cai, A. Zhang, Electrochemical pesticide sensitivity test using
[2] Q. Zhou, J. Xiao, W. Wang, G. Liu, Q. Shi, J. Wang, Determination of atrazine acetylcholinesterase biosensor based on colloidal gold nanoparticle modified
and simazine in environmental water samples using multiwalled carbon nan- sol–gel interface, Talanta 74 (2008) 766–772.
otubes as the adsorbents for preconcentration prior to high performance liquid [20] F.N. Kok, V. Hasirci, Determination of binary pesticide mixtures by an
chromatography with diode array detector, Talanta 68 (2006) 1309–1315. acetylcholinesterase–choline oxidase biosensor, Biosens. Bioelectron. 19
[3] J. Stenersen, Chemical Pesticides: Mode of Action and Toxicology, CRC Press, (2004) 661–665.
Washington, DC, 2004. [21] M. Shi, J.J. Xu, S. Zhang, B.H. Liu, J.L. Kong, A mediator-free screen-printed
[4] L.H. de Aguiar, G. Moraes, I.M. Avilez, A.E. Altran, C.F. Correˆa, Metabolical amperometric biosensor for screening of organophosphorus pesticides with
effects of Folidol 600 on the neotropical freshwater fish matrinxã, Brycon flow-injection analysis (FIA) system, Talanta 68 (2006) 1089–1095.
cephalus, Environ. Res. 95 (2004) 224. [22] J. Wang, M. Pumera, G. Collins, A. Mulchandani, Y. Lin, K. Olsen, Single-channel
[5] G.M. Rand, S.M. Petrocelli, Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology Methods and microchip for fast screening and detailed identification of nitroaromatic explo-
Applications, McGraw-Hill, 1984. sives or organophosphate nerve agents, Anal. Chem. 74 (2002) 1187–1191.
[6] F. Arduini, F. Ricci, C.S. Tuta, D. Moscone, A. Amine, G. Palleschi, Detection [23] G. Liu, Y. Lin, Electrochemical stripping analysis of organophosphate pesticides
of carbamic and organophosphorous pesticides in water samples using a and nerve agents, Electrochem. Commun. 7 (2005) 339–343.
cholinesterase biosensor based on Prussian Blue-modified screen-printed elec- [24] Z. Li, M. Wang, Amperometry for pesticide residues, Prog. Chem. 19 (2007)
trode, Anal. Chim. Acta 580 (2006) 155–162. 1585.
[7] R.A. Videira, M.C. Madeira, V.I. Lopes, V.M. Madeira, Changes induced by [25] H.C. Oudou, R.M. Alonso, H.C.B. Hansen, Voltammetric behaviour of the syn-
malathion, methylparathion and parathion on membrane lipid physicochemi- thetic pyrethroid lambda-cyhalothrin and its determination in soil and well
cal properties correlate with their toxicity, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1511 (2001) water, Anal. Chim. Acta 523 (2004) 69–74.
360–368. [26] Y.N. Ni, P. Qiu, S. Kokot, Simultaneous determination of three organophospho-
[8] G.A. Silva, F. Augusto, R.J. Poppi, Simultaneous optimization by neuro-genetic rus pesticides by differential pulse stripping voltammetry and chemometrics,
approach of a multiresidue method for determination of pesticides in Passiflora Anal. Chim. Acta 516 (2004) 7–17.
alata infuses using headspace solid phase microextraction and gas chromatog- [27] P. Manisankar, S. Viswanathan, A.M. Pusphalatha, C. Rani, Electrochemical stud-
raphy, J. Chromatogr. A 1138 (2007) 251–261. ies and square wave stripping voltammetry of five common pesticides on poly
[9] G.F. Jia, C.G. Lv, W.T. Zhu, J. Qiu, X.Q. Wang, Z.Q. Zhou, Applicability of cloud point 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene modified wall-jet electrode, Anal. Chim. Acta 528
extraction coupled with microwave-assisted back-extraction to the determina- (2005) 157–163.
tion of organophosphorous pesticides in human urine by gas chromatography [28] P. Manisankar, G. Selvanathan, C. Vedhi, Determination of pesticides using het-
with flame photometry detection, J. Hazard. Mater. 159 (2008) 300–305. eropolyacid montmorillonite clay-modified electrode with surfactant, Talanta
[10] P.S. Chen, S.D. Huang, Determination of ethoprop, diazinon, disulfoton and 68 (2006) 686–692.
fenthion using dynamic hollow fiber-protected liquid-phase microextraction [29] M. Sba¨ı, H. Essis-Tomea, U. Gombert, T. Breton, M. Pontiı̌e, Electrochemical
coupled with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, Talanta 69 (2006) stripping analysis of methyl-parathion (MPT) using carbon fiber microelec-
669–675. trodes (CFME) modified with combinations of poly-NiTSPc and Nafion® films,
[11] C.C. Leandro, P. Hancock, R.J. Fussell, B.J. Keely, Comparison of ultra- Sens. Actuators B 124 (2007) 368–375.
performance liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatog- [30] H.E. Bakouri, J.M. Palacios-Santander, L. Cubillana-Aguilera, A. Ouassini, I.
raphy for the determination of priority pesticides in baby foods by tandem Naranjo-Rodrı̌ıguez, J.L.H.-H. de Cisneros, Electrochemical analysis of endo-
quadrupole mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A 1103 (2006) 94–101. sulfan using a C18-modified carbon-paste electrode, Chemosphere 60 (2005)
[12] T. Perez-Ruiz, C. Martınez-Lozano, V. Tomas, J. Martn, High-performance liquid 1565–1571.
chromatographic assay of phosphate and organophosphorus pesticides using [31] M. Wang, Z. Li, Nano-composite ZrO2 /Au film electrode for voltammetric detec-
a post-column photochemical reaction and fluorimetric detection, Anal. Chim. tion of parathion, Sens. Actuators B 133 (2008) 607–612.
Acta 540 (2005) 383–391. [32] D. Du, X. Ye, J. Zhang, D. Liu, Cathodic electrochemical analysis of methyl
[13] A. Vakurov, C.E. Simpson, C.L. Daly, T.D. Gibson, P.A. Millner, Acetylcho- parathion at bismuth-film-modified glassy carbon electrode, Electrochim. Acta
linesterase-based biosensor electrodes for organophosphate pesticide detec- 53 (2008) 4478–4484.
1084 H. Parham, N. Rahbar / Journal of Hazardous Materials 177 (2010) 1077–1084
[33] D. Du, X. Ye, J. Zhang, Y. Zeng, H. Tu, A. Zhang, D. Liu, Stripping voltammet- [36] Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation, US Department
ric analysis of organophosphate pesticides based on solid-phase extraction at of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center
zirconia nanoparticles modified electrode, Electrochem. Commun. 10 (2008) for Drug Evaluation and Research, Rockville, MD, 2001, Available from:
686–690. http://www.fda.gov/CVM.
[34] S. Fan, F. Xiao, L. Liu, F. Zhao, B. Zeng, Sensitive voltammetric response [37] J. Wang, M. Chatrathi, A. Mulchandani, W. Chen, Capillary electrophoresis
of methyl parathion on single-walled carbon nanotube paste coated microchips for separation and detection of organophosphate nerve agents,
electrodes using ionic liquid as binder, Sens. Actuators B 132 (2008) Anal. Chem. 73 (2001) 1804–1808.
34–39. [38] D.A. Roston, P.T. Kissinger, Series dual-electrode detector for liquid chromatog-
[35] V.A. Pedrosa, J. Caetano, S.A.S. Machado, R.S. Freire, M. Bertotti, Acetyl- raphy/electrochemistry, Anal. Chem. 54 (1982) 429–434.
cholinesterase immobilization on 3-mercaptopropionic acid self assembled [39] B. Kastening, P. Zuman, L. Meites, I.M. Kolthoff (Eds.), Progress in Polarography,
monolayer for determination of pesticides, Electroanalysis 19 (2007) vol. 3, Wiley–Interscience, New York, 1972.
1415–1420. [40] J.C. Miller, J.N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, Ellis Harwood, 1984.