Human Global Overpopulation
Human Global Overpopulation
Human Global Overpopulation
James Brown
LL.B. ‘20 University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD1 3DH
Article history:
Received 17 October 2020 This paper is concerned with the serious problem of overpopulation, a challenging
Received in revised form 17 phenomenon that is causing increased stress to the earth and its resources with
February 2021 each passing day. The implications of overpopulation are far-reaching and include,
Accepted 09 April 2021 but are not limited to, environmental degradation and widespread poverty.
Correspondingly, this paper identifies that there is a pressing need to address this
Keywords: problem with a human rights compatible population control policy. To arrive at
this point, this paper will identify the difference between regulationist and
Overpopulation voluntarist approaches to policymaking. Accordingly, the Chinese one-child
Human rights policy introduced in the 1980s will be analysed as a famous and fitting example of
China a regulationist policy which quantitatively restricted the number of children that
One-child policy a couple could have. The analysis of this policy will indicate to what extent
UN regulationist policies introduced to control population can withstand human
Sustainable development goals rights based analysis.
Population control
Policymaking The research will then go further, seeking to offer human rights friendly solutions
Liberties to the need implement some form of population control. This paper will first draw
Indonesia upon the Indonesian population control response seen throughout the 1970s and
80s as an example of a successful voluntarist approach which provides logical
solutions. These solutions are identified as being largely voluntarist, and
promoting free and informed decision making in the area of family planning. More
precisely, this paper will coin the idea of ‘generating contentment’ as a policy
which will delay the desire for children. The idea of generating contentment will
focus on improving living standards in developing countries via the adoption of
the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, as well as the propagation
of widespread family planning services and the implementation of these into
educational curriculums. The implementation of these goals will be a primary
driver into reducing population by achieving outcomes such as broadened and
emphasised career opportunities for women, and challenging customs that supress
sexual education and contraception access.
liberties and human rights. The literature, however, and applies its applicability to possible population
falls short on supplying an analysis of these policies control policies. However, there are a few issues
using real life examples, predominantly due to its with Eisenhauer’s research, leading to gaps in the
age, and thus gives latitude for an expansion on its literature which are remedied here. Firstly, and
arguments that are primarily speculative in the most importantly, the study is not a recent piece of
absence of case studies such as the Chinese policy. research. As such, it does not benefit from discourse
Fittingly, this paper will attempt to pick up where around the highly significant Chinese one-child
the literature has left off, and apply a fresh analysis policy, which came into place a year after the
to population control policies and the extent of their article’s publication. The current study takes
legality within the context of international norms. advantage of this, and provides a nuanced
This paper will then present some possible solutions discussion of this policy to illustrate the inherent
which rest mainly within ‘voluntarist’ policies injustices of government mandated quantitative
including, but not limited to, incentivisation polices population control policies. The age of the paper
and educational and accessible approaches to family also renders it blind to solutions such as the United
planning, with a discussion of any implications they Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
may also present. Many of these possible solutions In fact, Eisenhauer even argues that at the time,
have been influenced by the Indonesian population “The UN position… is not satisfactory for dealing
policy within the 1970s and 80s which will be with the population problem” and calls for “stronger
discussed in further depth. In addition, the United action”. 2 Therefore, this paper updates this
Nations’ seventeen Sustainable Development discourse by focusing on the utility of the new
Goals, adopted in 2015, should be deemed SDGs as a nuanced but effective approach to
instrumental in the enactment of successful policy population control, which Eisenhauer’s paper did
in this area, as they address many of what this paper not have the chance to analyse.
considers the root causes of population growth;
poverty, overconsumption, inequalities, economic A further issue with Eisenhauer’s paper is the
factors and lack of innovation. Western centric view it takes of the discussion,
specifically with respect of the United States. For
example, focusing on solutions which are much
Current literature more accessible in the west, such as the imposition
of education fees. 3 Therefore, it does not
A review of the existing literature on the legality of satisfactorily address the problem where it is most
possible population control policies has identified a prevalent, in developing countries, and this is a
few key works in this area. The 1978 article: ‘Legal missed opportunity which will be appropriately
Implications of Population Control: A Practical covered here.
Reevaluation of Some Human Rights
Considerations’ by Susan Eisenhauer in the Another piece of literature that this author deems
Fordham International Law Journal is an important is a 1971 article appearing in the Harvard
authoritative paper in this field. 1 The paper Law Review which is silent as to the author’s
identifies the problem of overpopulation and the details. The article, ‘Legal Analysis and Population
possibilities available with respect of population Control: The Problem of Coercion’,4 is again very
control policies. Like this paper, it identifies the US centric and suffers from age, but offers a very
international human rights framework of the time interesting discussion of the types of policies
1 S C Eisenhauer, ‘Legal Implications of Population Control: A Practical Reevaluation of Some Human Rights
Considerations’ (1978) 2(1) Fordham Int Law Journal 1.
2 Ibid, 42.
3 Ibid, 31.
4 Unnamed Author, ‘Legal Analysis and Population Control: The Problem of Coercion’ (1971) 84(8) Harvard Law Review
1856.
3
available to deal with overpopulation. The paper possible solutions to overpopulation. This provides
analyses the two possible approaches to population a platform for elaboration on the applicability of the
control, terming them as ‘voluntarist’ and listed human rights principles to population control
‘regulationist’. Using this language allows the policymaking in the future.
current study to analyse possible policies which may
lead to successful population control. For example,
we see that the Chinese one-child policy is a Overpopulation – the extent and implications
regulationist policy, whereas increasing education
and addressing social needs would fall under a Overpopulation presents a pressing crisis which
voluntarist policy, which encourages free decision will target our way of life. The global population is
making yet may be coercive in guiding an individual nearing 8 billion, having almost doubled in just 46
(perhaps unconsciously) to make decisions which years from 1974.7 Scientists around the world have
will reduce their family size. 5 This paper will tried to highlight the severity of this situation. In
expand on this language and by utilising a 1992, over 1700 scientists, of which 104 were Nobel
‘voluntarist’ and ‘regulationist’ analysis to laureates, drafted a warning to humanity. 8 They
differentiate possible policies, identify that urged that “we must accept limits” to the
regulationist approaches are much more likely to “unrestrained population growth” due to the finite
have a pernicious effect on human rights. amount of resources on our planet, highlighting
that even in 1992, when the population was just 5.4
Finally, the 2019 paper, ‘Population Law and billion, one in five people lived in poverty, without
Policy: From Control and Contraception to Equity enough to eat, and one in ten suffered serious
and Equality’ by Victoria Mather is a much more malnutrition.9
recent analysis on population control and human
rights. 6 The paper summarises the positions of The implications stretch far beyond just poverty,
previous population control policies, from the and put together can set off a perpetual chain-
‘regulationist’ Chinese one-child policy to the reaction of negative consequences. In their warning,
sterilisation campaigns in India, to more voluntarist the scientists recognised the damage that
policies such as in Indonesia. Mather then overpopulation could have on six significant
introduces potentially relevant human rights mechanisms of our planet:
considerations, such as the applicability of first,
second, third and fourth generation rights to 1) The atmosphere – With CO2 emissions
population control. In general, the article feels more growing 12 fold during the 20th century, a
descriptive than analytical, and fails to analyse the growing population is a root cause of the
policies that it lists under the lens of human rights. global warming crisis. 10 With an
Furthermore, Mather does not put forward any increasingly mechanised lifestyle, the
demand for fossil fuels can only grow.11 The
5 Ibid, 1882.
6 V Mather, ‘Population Law and Policy: From Control and Contraception to Equity and Equality’ (2019) 50(3) St Mary’s
Law Journal 917.
7 The global population hit 4 billion in 1974, expected to hit 10 billion by 2060 – available at:
https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2017/11/World%20Scientists%27%20Warning%20to%20Humanity%201992
.pdf accessed 4 July 2020.
9 Ibid, P1, col 2.
10 United Nations Population Fund, ‘Population and Environmental Change’ (2001) P5, available at:
19 Ibid.
20 Renee Cho, ‘Why Endangered Species Matter’ Columbia University Earth Institute (26 Mar 2019) available at:
socioeconomic factors such as poverty and reduced This policy was introduced to curb the spiking
access to education. Correspondingly, there is logic population in China, to alleviate many issues such as
in addressing the socioeconomic factors in these scarcity of resources, high unemployment rates and
countries to indirectly influence population growth to encourage economic growth rather than the
rather than focusing on purely regulationist policy. strain it was facing.25 Such a strict policy was not
This will be discussed in further depth throughout without opposition, especially in rural areas.
the paper. Consequently, the CCP published a document
known as ‘Document 7’, which would allow local
Nevertheless, the repercussions of overpopulation governments some flexibilities to make
could be fatal to humankind and thus it is imperative exceptions, 26 but the policy remained largely
that governments act swiftly to curb it. It is compulsory. In fact, in many cases, the latitude
generally accepted that are only two natural given to local governments to enforce this policy led
approaches that can be adopted in population to many more human rights issues, such as
control polices; to directly regulate the ability to involuntary abortions, sterilisations, etc. This will
procreate or to achieve the same result through be explored further in the discussion of the policy’s
more indirect, gentle and coercive means. These are implications. Since 2013, the CCP began to relax the
the ‘regulationist’ or ‘voluntarist’ approaches to policy, culminating in its termination in 2016.27
policy making,23 in keeping with the language of the
Harvard Article. The Chinese one-child policy is the Enforcement and punishment
most famous example of population control and was
a strict regulationist policy. This paper will analyse The enforcement of the policy did not come from
the Chinese policy to highlight the implications of the central government, but instead occurred at a
regulationist policy in regard to population control. provincial level with the enforcement procedures
constructed by the local governments. This allowed
the policies to complement the local conditions. 28
The Chinese one-child policy Due to the flexibilities that local governments were
permitted to make under Document 7, some
Background provinces would allow a second child in limited
circumstances, such as the first being disabled, or
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its then even female. 29 However, because the power of
leader, Deng Xiaoping, introduced the regulationist enforcement was allocated on a provincial level, the
one-child policy in 1979, and formally implemented different mechanisms varied throughout China. The
the policy in 1980 in an open letter from the CCP.24 most common method was a mix of incentives and
Labour 1, 2.
26 CCP Central Committee, ‘CCP Central Committee’s Comments on the Report Regarding Family Control by CCP
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-end-of-chinas-one-child-
policy/#:~:text=Starting%20on%20January%201%2C%202016,for%20the%20last%2035%20years. accessed 8 Feb 2021.
28 B Li & H Zhang, ‘Does population control lead to better child quality? Evidence from China’s one child policy
rewards for compliant parents, and punishments for experience preferential treatment when applying
those who were not, regardless of the intention of for government jobs or even receive a ‘certificate of
the couple. honour’.35
Policies such as this appear draconian, as one would On the other end of the spectrum, the treatment of
naturally expect the implementation of such a policy ‘non-compliant’ couples was not nearly as amicable,
to be rooted in nationwide education and the as many were subjected to punishments. These
provision of contraception. However, whilst this punishments were largely monetary, yet there were
was something the central Chinese government more extreme punishments depending on the
took seriously,30 it did not resonate with the public province. Fines were regularly levied against
opinion. There did not seem to be a positive couples that had more than one child. It is estimated
encouragement for its use on a nationwide level, that by 2012, China had levied, since the adoption of
which was reflected in the general attitude of the one-child policy, around two trillion yuan
Chinese people regarding contraception. By 2004, (£206 billion).36 The fines were usually around 10-
as focus group thought that men should not take on 50% of the annual income of the couple, and even
the greater burden of contraception, and would more if it was a third child.37 Furthermore, there
prefer that women were sterilised.31 In fact, China was a household registration system in China, with
only lifted its ban on the advertisement of condoms households being listed as a worker or a peasant
in 2014. 32 This indicates that the provincial registration, due to the Communist state. Peasants
governments had been content with policies of lived off the land whilst workers would draw money
incentives and punishments, rather than a drive for from the state, being eligible for things such as a
more accessible contraception and improved pension, access to recreational facilities and much
education. more.38 Worker households thus had a lot more to
lose through non-compliance with the one-child
Many incentives were offered in most provinces for policy. They could lose certain benefits attached
compliance with the one-child policy. Common with the registration, or even have it repudiated
types of incentives included free water, tax breaks, entirely,39 as well as losing their job.
special pension benefits and monthly stipends from
the government. 33 Soniak goes on to note that in However, many provinces found themselves under
some instances, the child of a compliant couple was immense pressure to conform with a birth quota set
even awarded bonus points in school entrance
exams. 34 Compliant couples would frequently
30 Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, ‘Family Planning in China’ [1995] White
Paper, Chapter V, available at https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/celt/eng/zt/zfbps/t125241.htm accessed 7 July 2020.
31 K Hardee, Z Xie & B Gu, ‘Family Planning and Women’s Lives in Rural China’ (2004) 30(2) Int Family Planning
34 Ibid.
35 Ibid.
36 The Economist, ‘The one-child policy - The brutal truth’ The Economist (23 Jun 2012) available at:
39 Susan Greenhalgh, ‘The Peasantization of the One-Child Policy in Shaanxi’ in Deborah Davis & Stevan Harrell (eds),
40 Li (n37).
41 W Feng, B Gu & Y Cai, ‘The End of China’s One-Child Policy’ (2016) 47(1) Studies in Family Planning 83, 85.
42 J Liu, Y Englert & W Zhang, ‘Is Induced Abortion a Part of Family Planning in China?’ in Igor Lakhno (ed), Induced
Abortion and Spontaneous Early Pregnancy Loss – Focus on Management (IntechOpen, 2019) available at:
https://www.intechopen.com/books/induced-abortion-and-spontaneous-early-pregnancy-loss-focus-on-management/is-induced-
abortion-a-part-of-family-planning-in-china- accessed 16 July 2020.
43 Verna Yu, ‘ ‘I could hear the baby cry. They killed my baby… yet I couldn’t do a thing’: The countless tragedies of
China’s one-child policy’ South China Morning Post (15 Nov 2015) available at: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-
politics/article/1879116/i-could-hear-baby-cry-they-killed-my-baby-yet-i-couldnt accessed 17 July 2020.
44 Soniak (n29).
45 Bing Jia & Hanibal Goitom, ‘Formulation of the One-Child Policy in China’ Lib of Congress (Nov 19 2013) available at:
parents. The main source of international human Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
rights law is the UN International Covenant on Civil (ICESCR) is an exemplification of this, as suggested
and Political Rights (ICCPR), which China has by Karel Vašák, the jurist behind the generational
signed but not ratified. 47 The preamble for the categorisation of rights.51 Article 10 provides that:
treaty states that all rights are derived from the
“inherent dignity of the human person”. Article “…the widest possible protection
23(1) states that “family is a fundamental group unit and assistance should be accorded
of society and is entitled to protection by society and the family which is the natural and
the state”. This is very similar to the protection fundamental group unit of society,
afforded to private and family life under Article 8 of particularly for its establishment.”
the European Convention on Human Rights. These
rights can be interpreted in both ways; that there is The ICESCR’s protection of the family,
a right to have any type of family as desired “particularly for its establishment”, expressly
(including as many children as an individual may provides second generation protection of the
want) that can be protected/cared for by the family freedom to procreate. This acts as a further
unit, or that there is only protection of the family indication that international human rights law
that already exists and which any prospective family cannot accept strict regulationist approaches which
unit is not yet afforded. In practical application, interfere with the right to procreate freely. This
most states favour the first interpretation, gives more weight to the suggestion that
considering that China, a country that has not voluntarist approaches are the most appropriate
ratified the ICCPR, is the only state that has means of dealing with population control as they do
quantitatively limited family numbers in such a not impose interferences on the actual right itself,
widespread way. Therefore, any future policy to but attempt to guide and gently coerce individuals
limit population should do so in such a way which to engage in effective family planning.
affords the family a choice, based largely on
education and providing incentives, rather than International soft law
punishment.
Soft law is invaluable in aiding the interpretation of
As Mather has contended, the ICCPR is, in many Article 23 of the ICCPR and Article 10 of the
ways, an instrument guaranteeing ‘first generation’ ICESCR by expanding on the intended protections
rights.48 She characterises these rights as “freedom of the family. The UN, the body behind the
from, rather than freedom to”.49 Accordingly, they aforementioned covenants, has expanded upon the
may not be the most appropriate means to provide rights to have a family, and expressly the freedom
a freedom to procreate. Mather, in her discourse, to procreate, under various soft law instruments on
does not explicitly link the compatibility of multiple occasions. Firstly, in the Human Rights Day
generational rights to population control policies, Declaration 1966, “the opportunities to decide the
but her discourse implies that second generation number and spacing of children is a basic human
rights are the most applicable as ‘freedom to’ rights. right”.52 This was expanded upon into a resolution
She identifies that second generation rights which adopted in the International Conference on Human
assure freedoms require positive obligation, or Rights, Tehran in 1968. Resolution XVIII said that
protection, from the state.50 The UN’s International “couples have a basic human right to decide freely
50 Ibid.
51 C Wellman, ‘Solidarity, the Individual and Human Rights’ (2000) 22(3) Human Rights Quarterly 639.
52 United Nations, Human Rights Day Declaration on Population (10 Dec 1966).
9
and responsibly on the number and spacing of their by the existence of a rule of law
children”. 53 Furthermore, in 1984, the UN gave requiring it.”57
further recommendations for the implementation of
the world population plan of action. Correspondingly, opinio juris may be identified in
Recommendation 25 said that “Governments the various reactions to the Chinese one-child
should… make universally available… the means to policy. However, from the research it can be
assist couples and individuals to achieve their observed that significant condemnation of the
desired number of children”. 54 Taken together, policy did not occur,58 which would have been an
there is an indication of a strong mentality within indication of opinio juris. Nevertheless, China, as an
the United Nations that there should be no emerging superpower and an integral component of
restriction on the couple’s right to choose when and world trade was a country that would be foolish to
how to have any children. condemn. President Biden, as a Senator in 1985,
reportedly blocked a motion to condemn China due
International soft law is not only important in to the worries that it would “interfere with the
aiding the interpretations of legally binding normalization of trade relations”.59 In essence, the
instruments such as the ICCPR, but can evolve into lack of condemnation does not necessarily reject the
customary international law. 55 Article 38(1)(b) of constitution of opinio juris.
the Statute of the International Court of Justice
describes customary law as “a general practice Moreover, if one reviews the behaviour of other
accepted as law”. The mentality of the UN and its countries which have experienced population issues,
members leading to the constitutions of the various it becomes clear that they did not behave in the
soft law must be sufficiently cogent to evince opinio manner that China did. For instance, a ‘two-child
juris, to accept the right to self-family planning as norm’ has been utilised by many countries,
customary law. The International Court of Justice including Vietnam 60 and Indonesia. 61 The
in Nicaragua v United States 56 asserted that opinio difference here is that these policies were not
juris will be present if: enforced, and were more suitably equivalent to
governmental objectives that were met via
“States taking such action or other contraception campaigns etc.62 Accordingly, it can
States in a position to react to it, be seen that apart from China, countries struggling
must have behaved so that their with overpopulation have not acted as restrictively
conduct is evidence of a belief that and this may be enough to constitute opinio juris.
this practice is rendered obligatory Whether this soft law can successfully constitute an
53 United Nations, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, Tehran 1968, Resolution XVIII (3).
54 United Nations, Recommendations for the Further Implementation of the World Population Plan of Action 1984,
Recommendation 25.
55 M Olivier, ‘The relevance of ‘soft law’ as a source of international human rights’ (2002) 35(3) The Comparative and
58 There is a seeming lack of news articles and responses from governments etc. which indicate that the Chinese one-child
policy was condemned. It seems that the approach that was mainly taken was surveillance of the situation.
59 US Congress House Hearing, 112 Congress, ‘China’s one-child policy: The Government’s massive crime against
women and unborn babies’ Serial no 112-105 (22 Sept 2011) available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-
112hhrg68446/html/CHRG-112hhrg68446.htm accessed 10 Feb 2021.
60 D Goodkind, ‘Vietnam’s One-or-Two Child Policy in Action’ (1995) 21(1) Population and Development Review 85.
61 D Warwick, ‘The Indonesian Family Planning Program: Government Influence and Client Choice’ (1986) 12(3)
opinio juris or not, it still reflects the mentality and Natural rights
general consensus of the State Parties to the UN.
Olivier has described soft law as having an Under a philosophical approach, the most
important role in “facilitating and mobilising the fundamental human rights are natural rights. John
consent of states”. 63 Furthermore, according to Locke has asserted in his idea of perfect freedom
Druzin, it generates a sense of collective that “all men are naturally in … a state of perfect
responsibility, which makes it “uniquely calibrated” freedom to order their actions… as they see fit…
for adoption and compliance.64 Thus, soft law is of without asking leave, or depending on the will of
weighty value in international matters, an any other man” 66 and no government “ought to
illustration being that resolutions alone must harm another in his life, health, liberty, or
receive a majority vote. possessions”. 67 Locke’s ideology is an established
It is also worth noting that soft law is frequently a part of modern politics - governments have a duty
conscious decision. As Guzman and Meyer identify, to protect and not interfere with the natural rights
soft law is elected for many reasons, especially when of the person, which Locke argues is a criterion for
states are “uncertain about whether the rules they a legitimate Government. 68 According to Locke,
adopt today will be desirable tomorrow”.65 This is ‘liberty’ is a natural right, or a right given by God
known as the delegation theory and gives rise to the that a human possesses naturally before entering
quasi-legal personality of soft law. For example, the into the rules of a political society. Liberty is widely
aforementioned resolutions and declarations interpreted. The Supreme Court of the United
regarding family numbers may, in an era of severe States has interpreted the word ‘liberty’ to include a
overpopulation, be problematic were they binding right to procreate.69 This liberty also includes the
law. Whilst this may weaken the future effectivity fundamental right to an abortion. Justice Anthony
of soft law on population control, it does not Kennedy famously stated in Planned Parenthood v
undermine the fact that the current consensus, and Casey: “At the heart of liberty is the right to define
perhaps even opinio juris is reflected by the soft law, one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the
and they certainly complement the interpretation of universe, and of the mystery of human life”.70
the binding legal instruments.
In summation, the various soft law instruments Consequently, an analysis of natural rights further
indicate at least a general consensus, and at most, reinforces the notion that any population control
an opinio juris that population control policies policy should be aimed at minimising one’s desire to
should focus on voluntarist approaches which have a child, rather than directly interfering with a
attempt to reconcile a diminished ‘desire’ to have natural right whose protection forms the institution
multiple children without directly infringing the of legitimate government.
reproductive choices of couples, which strict
regulationist policies clearly do. Practical implications
63 Olivier (n55).
64 B Druzin, ‘Why does Soft Law Have any Power Anyway?’ (2017) 7(2) Asian Journal Int Law 361.
65 A T Guzman & T L Meyer, ‘International Soft Law’ (2010) 2(1) Journal of Legal Analysis 171.
66 Locke J & Shapiro I (ed), Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (First published 1689, Yale
68 Ruth W Grant, ‘John Locke on Women and the Family’ in supra n66, 297.
70 Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 US 833 (1992) [851] (Kennedy J).
11
similar policies around the world. Mainly, the achieved via pre-natal sex selection (which was later
problems that materialise when a country goes from outlawed) with couples aborting fetuses who were
a large population to a relatively small one. not of their preferred sex. 74 This issue is
compounded by the fact that, fertility rates will drop
a) Aging population – because there are fewer women to carry children
than ever before, making it difficult to rebalance the
The Chinese policy has, foreseeably, led to an aging population.
population in China. This is a huge threat to its
economy. The country will have fewer young people This reflects the misogynistic attitudes that were
to look after the elderly, less people to work in the prevalent in China at the time and presents further
economy, all whilst there are more pensions to pay human rights concerns to the one-child policy. Once
and retirees to support. China will now be ill- the prenatal sex screening was prohibited due to the
prepared to protect the elderly.71 disparity in sex ratio,75 an increase in the prevalence
of female infanticide occurred. 76 This dangerous
b) Labour shortages – consequence of a quantitative policy in a place
This implication is intertwined with the difficulties where such misogynistic views exist threatened the
of having to care for an aging population. The fact lives of many newborn children. The right to life is
that there will not be enough young people to keep enshrined in Article 6 of the ICCPR and the State
up with China’s economic activity is worrying, and Parties have a duty to “respect and ensure to all
is further exacerbated by the need to support the individuals” this right.77 This includes the “duty to
country’s elderly. The decline in the labour force is take positive measures to protect the right to life”.78
already prevalent in the coastal regions of China, In short, a policy which could foreseeably lead to the
rising wages are concomitant with the shortages, to loss of life is a plain infringement of the state’s
attract migrant workers and increase obligations under this provision. It is paramount
productivity.72 that a state considers foreseeable implications such
as this when creating policy.
c) Sex-ratio –
Further evidence that a policy like China’s is not a
The policy has given rise to a disproportionately suitable way of managing the population is
male dominant ratio in China. Studies have found evidenced by the fact that China is now encouraging
that this is related to the enforcement practices. The couples to have a second child, as a baby boom has
provinces where the policy was policed strictly not been forthcoming since lifting the policy. This
appeared to have a bigger disparity in sex-ratio and, is a desperate attempt to restore balance to the
as Ebenstein has identified, this generally indicates Chinese population and economy in light of the
a preference for male children in China.73 This was implications above.79
71 Charlie Campbell, ‘China’s Aging Population is a Major Threat to its Future’ Time (7 Feb 2019) available at:
https://time.com/5523805/china-aging-population-working-age/ accessed 21 July 2020.
72 H Li, L Li, B Wu & Y Xiong, ‘The End of Cheap Chinese Labor’ (2012) 26(4) Journal of Economic Perspectives 57.
73 A Ebenstein, ‘The “Missing Girls” of China and the Unintended Consequences of the One Child Policy’ (2010) 45(1) J
78 United Nations Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 36: Article 6: Right to Life (2019) [21].
79 T Hesketh, Y Wang & X Zhou, ‘The End of the One-Child Policy: Lasting Implications for China’ (2015) 314(24)
84 Mill J S, Utilitarianism (Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer, 1871) Part II.
85 There has been mention that Utilitarianism and the least restrictive alternative approach are compatible – C Lin,
‘Ethical exploration of the least restrictive alternative’ (2003) 54(6) Psychiatric Services 866.
86 Gooding v Wilson, 405 US 518 (1972).
87 Permana IB & Westoff C, The Two-Child Norm in Indonesia (Jakarta, Macro Int 1999) P1, available at:
Western superiority is founded. 89 This can be alternatives are a much more sensible option to
observed in the west with the notion of ‘defeating control population. Of course, contraception access
communism’ and the general incorporation of will always remain an integral part of both
constitutional liberties, which is not the case within voluntarist and regulationist policies. However, an
China, whose culture is based generally upon important aim of voluntarist policies will also be to
authoritarianism, not liberty. Chinese legal culture create a desire to have fewer children, which lies
is centred on the ‘rule-of-men’, which is different to predominantly in generating contentment in having
the rule of law in that those in power derive their a smaller family.
power to govern “from their superior virtue”,90 and
not through the consent of the people. The Western Indonesia: a case of effective voluntarist policy
approach of politics, Ruskola notes, encompasses
democracy, the rule of law and liberty, and “has Indonesia is a great example of a voluntarist policy
ruinous analytic consequences for the study of which was successful by the metrics the state set
Chinese law”,91 via criticism of the incompatibility itself. Indonesia experienced extreme population
of the laws with Western values. Whilst this paper growth and high fertility rates before the 1970s,
ostensibly denunciates the Chinese policy, it must especially in Java and Bali.92 The Indonesian policy
be mentioned parenthetically that the reader should focused on family planning and contraception.
be aware of the many alternative interpretations of Many family planning clinics were opened in the
the Chinese government stance, which may early 1970s, and then women’s ‘Acceptor Clubs’
conclude that their one-child policy was the most sprouted up within the local communities, often
fitting approach available under the system of headed by a locally prominent woman. The acceptor
politics familiar to the Chinese people. clubs liaised between local women and the family
planning clinics “to ensure a steady supply of
Alternative solutions to population control contraceptives at the local level”. 93 Indonesia
recognised “the need for and desirability of family
From the discourse of this article, it can be observed planning to make the small and happy family the
that there are generally two approaches to norm”.94
population control, regulationist and voluntarist.
Regulationist policies (such as the one-child policy) The policy focussed on family planning, including
impose direct state interference and enforcement to visits to communities by mobile family planning
achieve the objective whereas voluntarist policies teams, accessible contraception and contraceptive
share the same objectives but are naturally met via information and integrating family planning
the voluntary will of the people after persuasion and activities with other health-related activities. 95 In
even gentle coercion. plain, the main aim of the Indonesian policy was to
introduce the norm of “a small, happy and
After reviewing the Chinese one-child policy, it is prosperous family”,96 in which Indonesia was very
clear that the consequences (both intended and successful, largely achieving a maximum of two
otherwise) were quite extreme and softer children families by the mid-1990s.97
89 Ibid, 42.
90 Ruskola T, Legal Orientalism (Harvard University Press 2013) 14.
91 Ibid.
94 H Suyono, ‘The strategies, experiences and future challenges of the information component in the Indonesian Family
96 Ibid.
103 Ibid.
104 V I Chacko, ‘Some Considerations of Incentives and Disincentives in the Promotion of Family Planning: India’s
108 S Sinding, ‘Population, poverty and economic development’ (2009) 364(1532) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 3023.
109 Bill Gates, Remarks at US Global Leadership Coalition (2 Feb 2011) available at: http://www.usglc.org/wp-
Mashhad in 2013’ (2015) 20(2) Iran Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 269.
16
111 Dr Susan Newman, The Case for Only Child: Your Essential Guide (Health Comms Inc, 2011).
112 Smith (n22).
113 Mather (n6), 937.
114 M Makenzius et al, ‘Stigma related to contraceptive use and abortion in Kenya: scale development and validation’
116 United Nations, ‘World Population Prospects 2019’ New York (2019)
It is apparent that governments should realise some Membership of the Chinese Communist Youth
form of policy in order to combat overpopulation. League on the Problem of Controlling Population
However, regulationist policies tend to be extreme, Growth in Our Country’ (Sept 25, 1980)
such as China’s one-child policy. Policies such as
European Convention on Human Rights 1953
this give rise to numerous human rights and moral
infringements, as well as practical implications such Information Office of the State Council of the
as an ageing population, labour shortage and a People’s Republic of China, ‘Family Planning in
gender imbalance. In essence, regulationist policies China’ [1995] White Paper,
are not favourable under the lens of human rights, <https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/celt/eng/zt/zfbps
international soft law and various philosophical /t125241.htm> accessed 7 July 2020
approaches such as utilitarianism and natural
Statute of the International Court of Justice 1945
rights. Focus should therefore be given to softer, United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the
more indirect voluntarist policies. Child 1989
Voluntarist policies should aim to strike a natural United Nations, Final Act of the International
balance by focusing not on punishment, but on Conference on Human Rights, Tehran (1968)
empowerment. Empowerment will follow the key
tenets of education, access to contraception and United Nations Human Rights Committee,
family planning; much like the successful policy that General Comment No 36: Article 6: Right to Life
(2019)
was employed in Indonesia in the 1970s and 80s.
Voluntarist approaches that focus on the United Nations, Human Rights Day Declaration
aforementioned tenets allow a more gentle and on Population (10 Dec 1966)
sustainable approach to population control in
regions with more nuanced problems, such as United Nations, International Covenant on Civil
poverty, inequality and cultural barriers. The and Political Rights 1966
human rights instruments from the UN also
suggest that policies to limit population should be United Nations International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1966
based on a voluntarist approach. Their Sustainable
Development Goals offer policies which focus on United Nations, Recommendations for the Further
reducing poverty, inequality and over-consumption, Implementation of the World Population Plan of
and which emphasise the need for innovation, work Action 1984,
opportunities and economic improvement. It has <https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/pop
been identified that these goals will encompass a ulation/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalco
general improvement to the standard of living, mpact/E_CONF.76_19_Recommendations.pdf>
accessed 20 July 2020
which should generate contentment and diminish
the desire for more children, encouraging the norm
of a small but happy family. Cases
B Li & H Zhang, ‘Does population control lead to M Olivier, ‘The relevance of ‘soft law’ as a source
better child quality? Evidence from China’s one of international human rights’ (2002) 35(3) The
child policy enforcement’ (2017) 45(2) Journal of Comparative and International Law Journal of
Comparative Economics 246 Southern Africa 289
C Lin, ‘Ethical exploration of the least restrictive N Golmakani et al, ‘Relationship between gender
alternative’ (2003) 54(6) Psychiatric Services 866 role attitude and fertility in women referring to
C Wellman, ‘Solidarity, the Individual and Human health centres in Mashhad in 2013’ (2015) 20(2)
Rights’ (2000) 22(3) Human Rights Quarterly 639 Iran Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 269
H Li, L Li, B Wu & Y Xiong, ‘The End of Cheap T Hesketh, Y Wang & X Zhou, ‘The End of the
Chinese Labor’ (2012) 26(4) Journal of Economic One-Child Policy: Lasting Implications for China’
Perspectives 57 (2015) 314(24) JAMA 2619
H Suyono, ‘The strategies, experiences and future Unnamed Author, ‘Legal Analysis and Population
challenges of the information component in the Control: The Problem of Coercion’ (1971) 84(8)
Indonesian Family Planning Programme’ (1988) Harvard Law Review 1856
3(4) Asia Pacific Population Journal 33
V I Chacko, ‘Some Considerations of Incentives
I Manisalidis et al, ‘Environmental and Health and Disincentives in the Promotion of Family
Impacts of Air Pollution: A Review’ (2020) 8(14) Planning: India’s Experience’ (1975) 7 Columbia
Front Public Health: doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014 Human Rights Law Review 45
J Caldwell & P Caldwell, ‘The Cultural Context of V Mather, ‘Population Law and Policy: From
High Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa’ (1987) 13(3) Control and Contraception to Equity and Equality’
Population and Development Review 409 (2019) 50(3) St Mary’s Law Journal 917
J Clarke, ‘The Chinese Population Policy: A W Feng, B Gu & Y Cai, ‘The End of China’s One-
Necessary Evil?’ (1987) 20 NYU Journal of Child Policy’ (2016) 47(1) Studies in Family
International Law & Politics 321 Planning 83
J Li, ‘China’s One-Child Policy: How and How W Huang, ‘How does the one child policy impact
Well Has it Worked? A Case Study of Hubei social and economic outcomes?’ (2017) 387(Sept)
19
Betsy Hartmann, Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: Charlie Campbell, ‘China’s Aging Population is a
The Global Politics of Population Control (Chicago, Major Threat to its Future’ Time (7 Feb 2019)
Haymarket Books 2016) <https://time.com/5523805/china-aging-
population-working-age/> accessed 21 July 2020
Dr Susan Newman, The Case for Only Child: Your
Essential Guide (Florida, Health Comms Inc, 2011) ‘Fertility rate, total (births per woman) – China’
Edward Said, Orientalism (London, Penguin 1977) The World Bank
<https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.
Jeremy Bentham, A Fragment on Government TFRT.IN?locations=CN> accessed 11 Feb 2021
(London, 1776)
F Wang, B Gu & Y Cai, ‘The end of China’s one-
J Liu, Y Englert & W Zhang, ‘Is Induced Abortion child policy’ Brookings (2016)
a Part of Family Planning in China?’ in Igor <https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-end-of-
Lakhno (ed), Induced Abortion and Spontaneous Early chinas-one-child-
Pregnancy Loss – Focus on Management policy/#:~:text=Starting%20on%20January%201
(IntechOpen. , 2019) Available from: %2C%202016,for%20the%20last%2035%20years.>
<https://www.intechopen.com/books/induced- accessed 8 Feb 2021
abortion-and-spontaneous-early-pregnancy-loss-
focus-on-management/is-induced-abortion-a-part- Gioietta Kuo, ‘Overpopulation and water scarcity
of-family-planning-in-china-> accessed 16 July leading to world future food crisis’ Stanford MAHB
2020 (12 Jul 2020) <https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-
item/overpopulation-and-water-scarcity-leading-
John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism (London, to-world-future-food-crisis/> accessed 3 Feb 2021
Longman, Green, Reader and Dyer 1871)
Katie Luoma, ‘How does Population Growth
Locke J & Shapiro I (ed), Two Treatises of Impact Ocean Health?’ Population Education Blog
Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (16 Nov 2016)
(First published 1689, Yale University Press 2003) <https://populationeducation.org/how-does-
population-growth-impact-ocean-health/>
Permana IB & Westoff C, The Two-Child Norm in accessed 3 Feb 2021
Indonesia (Jakarta, Macro Int 1999)
<https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FA28/FA28. Katrin Buchenbacher, ‘What type of contraception
pdf> accessed 11 Feb 2021 does China’s younger generation prefer?’ The
Global Times (15 Oct 2017)
Susan Greenhalgh, ‘The Peasantization of the One- <http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1070279.sh
Child Policy in Shaanxi’ in Deborah Davis & tml> accessed 12 July 2020
Stevan Harrell (eds), Chinese Families in the Post-
Mao Era (University California Press, 1993) Larry LeDoux, ‘Does Population Growth Impact
Climate Change?’ Scientific American (29 Jul 2009)
Teemu Ruskola, Legal Orientalism (Harvard <https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pop
University Press 2013) ulation-growth-climate-change/> accessed 3 Feb
2021
Other Resources Matt Soniak, ‘How does China Enforce its One-
20
Baby Policy?’ Mental Floss (5 Jan 2012) ‘China’s one-child policy: The Government’s
<https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/29647/ho massive crime against women and unborn babies’
w-does-china-enforce-its-one-baby-policy> Serial no 112-105 (22 Sept 2011)
accessed 6 July 2020 <https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-
112hhrg68446/html/CHRG-112hhrg68446.htm>
Renee Cho, ‘Why Endangered Species Matter’ accessed 10 Feb 2021
Columbia University Earth Institute (26 Mar 2019)
<https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2019/03/26/enda Verna Yu, ‘ ‘I could hear the baby cry. They killed
ngered-species-matter/> accessed 4 Feb 2021 my baby… yet I couldn’t do a thing’: The
countless tragedies of China’s one-child policy’
Robert Sanders, ‘Scientists uncover evidence of South China Morning Post (15 Nov 2015)
impending tipping point for earth’ Berkeley News (6 <https://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-
Jun 2012) politics/article/1879116/i-could-hear-baby-cry-
<https://news.berkeley.edu/2012/06/06/scientist they-killed-my-baby-yet-i-couldnt> accessed 17
s-uncover-evidence-of-impending-tipping-point- July 2020
for-earth/> accessed 3 Feb 2021
Worldometers, ‘World Population’
The Economist, ‘The one-child policy - The brutal <https://www.worldometers.info/world-
truth’ The Economist (23 Jun 2012) population/> accessed 3 May 2020
<https://www.economist.com/china/2012/06/23
/the-brutal-truth> accessed 14 July 2020
Further reading
‘Total fertility rate in India, from 1880 to 2020’
Statista (2020) Alan Ware & Dave Gardener, ‘Yes,
<https://www.statista.com/statistics/1033844/fe (Over)Population IS a Problem!’ (MAHB, Nov 15,
rtility-rate-india-1880-2020/> accessed 11 Feb 2018) <https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/yes-
2021 overpopulation-problem/> accessed 4 July 2020
Union of Concerned Scientists, ‘World Scientists’ MK Whyte, ‘China’s One Child Policy’ Oxford
Warning to Humanity’ (1992) Bibliographies (26 June 2019)
<https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/atta <https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/martinwhyte/f
ch/2017/11/World%20Scientists%27%20Warnin iles/chinas_one_child_policy.pdf> accessed 20 July
g%20to%20Humanity%201992.pdf> accessed 4 2020 – has many different articles related to
July 2020 China’s one-child policy.
United Nations Population Fund, ‘Population and MK Whyte, W Feng & Y Cai, ‘Challenging myths
Environmental Change’ (2001) about China’s one-child policy’ (2015) 74 The China
<https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub- Journal 144
pdf/swp2001_eng.pdf> accessed 3 Feb 2021
UN Dept of Economic and Social Affairs,
United Nations, ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ ‘Reproductive Rights’
<https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/su <https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/pop
stainable-development-goals/> accessed 1 Oct ulation/theme/rights/index.asp> accessed 20 July
2020 2020