Scribd
Upload
3K views2 pages

J1 Premoderation Template

J1 forms

Uploaded by

nathicoka4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views2 pages

J1 Premoderation Template

J1 forms

Uploaded by

nathicoka4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Annexure J 1

PRE-ASSESSMENT MODERATION TOOL

NAME OF CENTRE/SCHOOL: ______Mpilisweni SOS____________________


DISTRICT: __Ekurhuleni South__________

Subject Gr 10 EGD June 2024 Name of DH/Subject Specialist Matyatya W.


N.B: This tool must be used by the DH/Subject Specialist to moderate tasks prior to their
administration

1.TECHNICAL CRITERIA
Comment on the quality of each of the following criteria for determining the quality of standards applied on
the task.
Criterion Comments
Cover page: Name of school, subject, time allocation, All information given
grade, task description, mark allocation, examiner,
moderator, number of pages
1.2 Clearly specified and unambiguous instructions Clear
1.3 Correct numbering of questions Correct
1.4 Appropriate font size and type throughout the task Correct font used
1.5 Mark allocations (marks per question / instruction, after Marks allocated correctly
each sub section, marks additions and correct totals)
1.6 The quality of illustrations, graphs, tables, drawings, Clear
pictures etc.

2. CONTENT COVERAGE AND COGNITIVE DEMANDS

2.1 Content coverage of the task as prescribed in the Topics as per ATP
CAPS
2.2 The weighting of the content as prescribed by the Correctly weighed
CAPS
2.3 Appropriate distribution of cognitive levels as Balanced
prescribed by CAPS.
2.4 The task allows for creative responses from students Creativity allowed

2.5 Choice questions: (equal level of difficulty where N/A


relevant)
2.6 Scaffolding of questions from simple to complex Scaffolded, with Question 4 as Level 4

2.7 Correlation between mark allocation, level of difficulty Correlate


and time
3. MARKING GUIDELINE

3.1 Efficiency of marking guideline in terms of sufficient Consistent


alternatives, allowance of consistent marking.
3.2 Correlation of mark allocation on the question paper Same marks on Q.Paper and Memo
and on the marking guideline.

4. LANGUAGE

4.1 The use of correct subject terminology (jargon) Jargon is correct

4.2 Appropriateness of the language to the level of Appropriate


learners
4.3 Evidence of bias in terms of gender issues, race, No gender bias
cultural issues, and provincial and regional bias
Does the task meet all the requirements to declare it fair, YES NO Date of resubmission:
valid and reliable? x

The task is: Approved/conditionally approved/disapproved


(Circle whichever is applicable)

Name of Moderator: Matyatya W

Signature: __W. Matyatya______________

Date: 30/05/2024

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy